Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-1251315-20141209223032/@comment-26112212-20141210074127

Because If the new information has come we can update it, and create new page (arcs) based on the information of this databook. It will be like online version of this databook and create redirects, if the reader feels the continuation of story isn't like this whosoever may be will click this (in character article page because not every character is going to be present in some arcs) this is just my suggestion, there are already existing volumes/chapters for story we have documented so we can redirect there. I also oppose changing the name because the names are just for reference purpose and title about the timeline about some incidents (the new arcs name do not differ in meaning as our arcs are already only good but differ slightly from name) and we must worry about the validity of our information because that's important we are providing information to readers, as I said above the names are just for highlighting the incidents and the meaning in content is important, one might question the validity of our data, so we have the story and info well documented, but there is no need to present it in format like the author in character articles/other pages, we are presenting official information and it is reliable.

Edit 2-I'm again this is last, Ignore my above message, I know now there is a page "Plot of Naruto" and after changing that first it's not a big deal to change lead article pages. The work will be dividing Itachi pursuit arc into 3, Confining the Jinchuriki Arc into 2, and Fourth Shinobi world war arc into 2 by using the volumes as references and the rest is changing the title name. Though I really feel keeping both names, now our names are convenient.