Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-32617252-20180617235347/@comment-27924662-20180621060616

@Seelentau Firstly coming to this whole issue of moderating the Forums, Most of the racket we all are talking about here is usually done by the new users. It's quite understandable and nostalgic when one reads their posts. But for most of the part I feel such threads die down within few weeks once they adjust to wiki. Few of the number which remains are usually dial down By mods or senior user.(or that's how system is supposed to work) As to whole argument for lack of "staff members" to limit such activities, I am quite sure there are few users capable of moderating especially from a sect who are regularly involved in forum. If you want we can nominate a few. Finally the Versus Debate. I feel that Narutopedia's Versus Debate is lot more "better" than any of the sites you mentioned. The Very number indicates how many trash threads, repetition and spams are there on the site. There are about 60-70 characters worth discussing in debates so number should be probably small. You don't see users here incessantly writing stuff like Iruka > Any other characters or trolls like that or someone writing some cheesy lines of which you can't figure head or tail for life of it. Some of them even go around comparing characters from other universes and bang there you go. It's just utter chaos out there. Even the numbers for these reasons are not only inflated they don't have relevant content. Also I feel that we often get the chance to correct plot related article and several jutsu usage thanks to Versus Debate Board. These details would never come up if you kept around doing the usual editing business. I for one feel that It's worth it despite the difficulties. @Lorenzo I think so your approach might be effective in curbing such activities. This will also bring more Transparency to system since everyone can see the exchange between user and action taken by the Mods. Probably its win-win for every party involved.