Board Thread:Boruto Discussions/@comment-10336-20170908030945/@comment-10336-20170908050225

Thanks guys, that makes sense now. I thought the cord was tested for both sets of DNA. If it was tested only for one, and the other was assumed based on location it was found, this means there is no proof. Still, for argument's sake, it is worth nothing there is with no DNA test for the parent's DNA there is no conclusive proof either way :P