Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-36019309-20190114073523/@comment-34656247-20190205070653

JamesSenpai wrote: "She was sitting without any intervening time or space behind me" makes just as much sense as "she was sitting 0.0 seconds behind me" so your argument fails. Zero is just the term i am using for the fact there is no time that transpires when immediately and instantly takes place. No intervening time. There is no time that intervenes with immediately or instantly. So when something happens instantly, it happens with no intervening time. You can whine all you want, but the illusion of Tsukiyomi has time based off your example from the novel and nothing you can twist or do can change that. Your argument is invalid. So the girl in that example is superhuman: confirmed. You'll have to do better than that. You still can't change the fact that KAKASHI made his statement.

Still doesn't prove it happens instantly. But proves that it happens less than seconds,which a bunch of people with common sense would see as a moment/immediate/something that happened at once.i guess these people don't know what they're saying look at the third one, there is another superhuman who can move in no time .Lemme ask you this, what word would you use to describe tsukuyomi's speed then, if it's not instant?

I don't need visual proof because it states no intervening time. Let me change it up for a moment and speak on your level since you seemingly can't comprehend common sense. The only misunderstanding here is you not knowing what that means. Lol. If there is no time, then there is no time. The Illusion has time therefore cannot be what Kakashi was referring too. "which by the way means that Kakashi was saying that 'Itachi has you in his genjutsu in 0.0 seconds'?" Debunked? That's exactly right. There isn't a single second that takes place before you are put in Tsukuyomi after looking into Itachi's eyes. But if not, please prove me wrong. Show me where Itachi has never put someone instantly inside Tsukuyomi after making eye contact? Show me where Tsukuyomi isn't cast in 0.0 seconds. So you're willing to accept that Itachi can inject his chakra into someone in no time in 0.0 seconds....but you can't accept that a jutsu can be as fast? you call that common sense?...i can't prove it because it doesn't exist, why don't you prove that itachi places someone in his genjutsu in NO TIME!!!!!! and show your proof of it being 0.00000000 seconds. I'll watch you fail.

"I dare you to say Bee can't break tsukuyomi, i don't think you can because you believe that he can break it." This made me laugh. Grade school logic. Sounds like it came from a five year old. That same argument can be applied to the other side. "I dare you to say Bee can break tsukuyomi, i don't think you can because you believe that he can't break it." Pure crap. I won't say either. Why? Cause there's no proof for either side. Your "proof" is just a page. If you going to post a page i suggest you point at the "proof" or quote it. If not, it's irrelevant. I'm not going to waste my time to find your "proof" for you. Lol. Read it, didn't see any proof. Moving on. Hey look that ex thief robbed bank x in the next ten years arrest him!!!....no they can't because there is no proof that he robbed the bank the incident hasn't occurred yet so he's innocent until proven guilty and the ex thief being proven guilty is beyond the realm of proof at the moment...so he's free and can't be arrested. Grade school logic. Apply the same logic to killerbee. At this point i feel like you're trolling man.

There is no proof for either side? you mean there is no proof for the side you're obviously leaning on. You think i'll post the wiki page without checking? i did check it's just all in your head and my proof is just not the wiki page, it's the manga and anime so far..he made no improvement, there is no sign of it, no proof. And where is your proof that Gaara can't use ultra instincts? i feel like you're not arguing with truths but is just arguing for the sake of being victorious.

Ninja Of War wrote: It's amazing how you can say this to someone else, but can't confirm it to me. Instead you direct something pointless to me, smh. It's what i've been doing all along

Now, is it not the opposition's stance that the databook is correct? So how can my statements be not "fully convincible" when it is taken literally from the databook?? Because it's just your way of interpreting it, it can still be seen and understood on both ways. Which is the way i presented, and the way you presented in our argument on the subject. Which is why i said it's not fully convincible. As for your other questions on who can break it and how? It's obvious from my question, that the point I was trying to make was Itachi doesn't have the authority to limit all shinobi. That doesn't mean I must know who can break Tsukuyomi and how, only that it's possible. So it likes a lawyer going to fight a case but has no evidence. I get your question, i understood it, but it is you who misunderstood what i was doing....and what i was doing is simply asking a question and what you were doing is simply failing to respond to it.But finally i got the response. AND also i believe i made a statement on this, with Itachi statement about only sharingan users can break it, the series in no way contradicted it. And a i've said a thousand times, top tier non uchihas got stomped with basic genjutsu....how is it possible for them to break tsukuyomi? so your statement has no juice until you can add some to it by proving the how and who.