User talk:WindStar7125

Re: Naruto and COAT
He used YYR, not Coat, according to Suzaku's translation. • Seelentau 愛 議 17:47, February 21, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Deletions
I figured that having a "X (disambiguation)" redirect wouldn't be as effective as just a "X" redirect. I was going to redirect "Team Ten" to that disambiguation page, but it already redirects to "Team Asuma". Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:26, February 22, 2015 (UTC)

re: filter
I'll poke UltimateSupreme to update the filter to exclude rollbacks. :) --Sajuuk talk 09:02, February 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * The filter has been updated :)
 * Regarding the colours, it's like that for everyone. We are part of some private test for feedback purposes.
 * I agree that it is very annoying, so please leave feedback about it here (I see you left a bit of feedback). --Sajuuk talk 21:01, February 24, 2015 (UTC)

U. Gi. O.
Basically, what happened is that notification rules were violated, but, others made excuses to list it like that from now on. I was contacted by the head of the wiki for reverting the edits and I said that making an excuse for a one-time thing is not worth it, he didn't like what I had to say about it and threatened to ban me if I don't stop reverting the unneeded edit. I noted him that threats about banning for no reason aren't scary to me and he banned me for harassing him, which I clearly did not do. After a month I dared him to ban me again (yes, it was ballzy of me) and he did it indefinitely. Sorry if this message is long, If you were interested you could've just asked sooner.. I promise this won't in any way interfere with my edits here.--Omojuze (talk) 11:09, February 25, 2015 (UTC)

lol
lol. That made me laugh ;) --Sajuuk talk 15:25, February 25, 2015 (UTC)

part 1 filler ?
Can I ask what the source is for changing every one of the filler arcs in part 1? --Sajuuk talk 10:48, February 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * He gives no source for where he found that data. And I don't think he was inviting any user to go and actually change it either. Especially as you can see that the link was pointing to the wiki's title, with different display text. For all we know, that might not even be the official names, since some of them don't make sense at all. --Sajuuk talk 18:30, February 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't even remember the source he gave. I know you want to be consistent, even I want consistency, but... yeah. :P --Sajuuk talk 18:46, February 26, 2015 (UTC)

Not to my knowledge. ~SnapperTo 18:00, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Six Paths Chakra
You're awesome...was following you simultaneously :D...thanx for your immediate response...really appreciate your sense of responsibility star :] --DARK ZERO--talk 22:58, February 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * at least U bothered to consider our discussion...not just put it behind your head...I'm grateful for it. --DARK ZERO--talk 23:11, February 26, 2015 (UTC)


 * Howdy coboy...sry, had 2 other questions regarding the databook...


 * 1. Is will materialization classified as a yin-yang release...or a rinnegan KG...or nuthin at all...


 * 2. Is 6 paths sage tech classified as senjutsu & fuinjutsu... --DARK ZERO--talk 12:36, February 28, 2015 (UTC)


 * bump... --DARK ZERO--talk 11:18, March 1, 2015 (UTC)


 * then I'll try suzaku...thanx for replying mate ;] --DARK ZERO--talk 07:01, March 2, 2015 (UTC)

Threads
why the hell should i listen to you and not block pages...?? i am as much a chat moderator as you are... Sage Minato (talk) 15:10, March 2, 2015 (UTC)

re: Daniel Bailey
I know he is. But none of the sysops seem to care for indefinitely blocking him. I advised they did so before and it was not done. --Sajuuk talk 08:56, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Eight Gates
The eight gates are eight gates. They are not a technique or anything, they're just stuff in the body, like the tenketsu or the heart. The Eight Gates Release Formation is this. • Seelentau 愛 議 12:23, March 3, 2015 (UTC)
 * mmh, basically, yes. The state of having the 8th gate opened is that technique. The eight gates in itself are not a technique, if you wondered why I removed the Kinjutsu label. • Seelentau 愛 議 00:23, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * That's not what I said. • Seelentau 愛 議 00:57, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * Not at the same time, but in order. After you reached and opened the eighth gate, you're in that state. I wonder if you could open only the eighth gate, though... • Seelentau 愛 議 01:09, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Asura and YYR
Weren't the powers he gave his sons just the body/eyes stuff? YYR was never mentioned. • Seelentau 愛 議 01:39, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * On the last page, you mean? By that logic, Ashura must've had all the feats Naruto and Sasuke gained, meaning Rinnegan, TSB, YYR, Six Paths Senjutsu mode. Which is not the case. Hagoromo is really just talking about power: First it was only Ashura who had power (as the head of Ninshu), and now it's Naruto and Sasuke who have power. • Seelentau 愛 議 01:53, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * No idea why that, either. I mean, it makes sense, seeing how they basically represent Yin and Yang, but since it's not confirmed... • Seelentau 愛 議 02:01, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * It isn't, but we can't say it for certain, either. It's a shame that the databook didn't elaborate on this. :/ • Seelentau 愛 議 02:33, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Proving a point
First and foremost, no disruptive behavior was happening, I did not create an article and nominated it for deletion, I politely voiced my opinion on this matter in the talk page. Needless to say, it's only my opinion and the article needs to exist, at least for now, like it's predecessors that I've listed in the talk page. And also, to put it all shortly, taking it to the respective talk page is a better way to make people notice the (issue?) than in the forums.--Omojuze (talk) 05:41, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are suggesting the whole deletion of the Shrinking Technique page, there was a talk page post in there, but nowadays, it is somehow really hard to get a rational response. An editor suggested deleting it, I agreed. Nobody put in any of their thoughts in the talk page, and there was time to do so, so that's why i nominated it for deletion.--Omojuze (talk) 13:41, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * Whether I asked or not, the article should've still been created, following the other examples, and I did just that. Guess asking a question/raising a topic for others to see in the talk page is a crime now. Good to know.--Omojuze (talk) 14:03, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * And I do understand what you're trying to say. Yet it's not like I created an empty article and then got raged in the talk page about its creation.--Omojuze (talk) 14:04, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not like I tagged all unnamed genjutsu for deletion. I politely took it to the talk page to discuss this. If nobody will agree with me, I won't throw a tantrum or anything. I did nor will I do something of the sort and I don't really feel like I did anything of an issue here. I read what you've sent me and if I hadn't included the words "created in the purpose of proving a point", everything would've been fine. But, the article, as of the things we currently do, is not for debate for deletion. Pal, you just blew this out of proportion, but It's ok, I think I need to be more careful about what I say because I can be misunderstood.--Omojuze (talk) 14:35, March 4, 2015 (UTC)