User talk:Iloveinoxxx

ACTIVE USERS
there are plenty of active users and im back now so dont worry Munchvtec (talk) 10:28, January 5, 2014 (UTC)munchvtec

Your Place In This Community/Understanding the Community
Hello Iloveinoxxx,

I am writing this message to you because I understand your feelings, but like I did myself, you need to learn your place in this community. I read your argument with TheUltimate3, and I understand your frustration with some of the higher-ups of the community. I used to have the same feelings towards the attitudes they displayed, but after some consideration, I realize that it must be very difficult to maintain a website, as well as manage their daily lives. Also, no matter how "rude" they may seem at times, they mean no hard feelings towards you or anyone else, and most of their comments are to encourage us "newcomers" and their decisions are made mostly for the good of the wiki. Finally, I want you to realize that the decisions you make can be judged by the community. You need to understand that your edits can be reverted or changed and you need to accept that. You also need to accept that those who have more experience or have been here longer have a more prominent opinion over you. For example, you and I engaged in an argument over a picture I posted in Sasuke's article. It was not your place to decide whether or not it should appear in the article, which is why I kept changing it. Once one of the higher-ups (Omnibender I believe) decided it was not necessary, that was the end of the discussion. Whenever you want to make a questionable edit, I suggest you ask whether or not it would benefit the wiki on the article's talk page, as I have been doing more often now a days. I hope you were not offended at all by this post, but I am just trying to help you so others won't ostracize you. I hope you take what I said into consideration, and I hope you respond with your feelings on my talk page. Thanks for reading!

Regards, --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 21:24, January 5, 2014 (UTC)

I guess he just summed it all up for you iloveinoxxx. Munchvtec (talk) 14:01, January 7, 2014 (UTC)munchvtec

Have you given any thought to what I said? --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 20:16, January 26, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Sasuke
I only just saw the article (I don't read the manga) and because I don't visit this wiki much, I just assumed it to be vandalism. However, I think it would be better to wait until next chapter before just making a random assumption like that: plenty of times a chapter or episode has ended with someone being stabbed, only for the next one to show the person survived. --Speysider Talk Page 15:23, January 15, 2014 (UTC)

Chat box
We could all see you, but for some reason you couldn't see us. Speysider suggests you wait til your connection is better. I'll let you know if we come up with anything else --Hawkeye2701 (talk) 18:51, March 15, 2014 (UTC)

Re: hey!!
A weapon isn't just something that damages your opponent, it's a tool that is used in battle. For example, Deidara may not throw his eye scope at this opponent to damage them, but that doesn't make it less of a weapon, he uses it to aim at long distance targets. The ones I reverted were a book (the paw print one, which much like the books written by Jiraiya, are not used to fight with) and an article of clothing that was a paper-thin disguise. It's kinda like jutsu classifications. Even if it's defensive or supplementary, it's still a jutsu. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 23:23, March 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if infiltration counts as combat for purposes of user listing. The general discussion where this was decided was a couple years ago, so I don't have that readily available to direct you to. Look through list of tools talk page maybe. Most times a new tool comes along, it is a weapon so they get listed. You can look through Category:Tools to look up what we to list users for and not, but that'll probably be time consuming. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 23:39, March 24, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Posts
"what the hell where did my post go????" In future, please don't make a post asking where your post was deleted. Moving on: your posts are being deleted because they do not contribute whatsoever to the discussion at hand. Several posts you have made did nothing to contribute or were simply spam and didn't need to be posted. If your post is removed, check the history of the thread (hover over the top post, click More and select History: the user who removed your post will have left a reason as to why), instead of making another spam post asking why the post was removed. If you persist in making uncontributive posts, your access to the forums may be revoked. Just a warning. --Speysider Talk Page 13:37, April 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * If you Kudos a post, you do NOT then need to make a post just saying the exact same thing a Kudos is meant to do. It does nothing except increase your edit count needlessly. --Speysider Talk Page 15:02, April 13, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Chōmei
No, you listen. Both SuperSajuuk and I said "Stop making pointless edits" because that's what other users have been doing to the page for the past week or so. The page is about to be locked from editing, so don't try to pick a fight with me. WindStar7125  (Talk) (Contributions) 20:37, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Plus, the text you are editing does not even appear on the page, it is a comment designed to desist bad editing from users. It does not matter that Chomei's name is missing a macron: what does matter is you making pointless edits to the page that don't even change the appearance of the article when you click Publish, you are simply just padding your edit count and adding pointless revisions for people to see in the edit history. Please stop. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 20:39, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Then go complain to SuperSajuuk, I'm not gonna waste my time trying to persuade you. WindStar7125  WindStar7125 Task.svg (Talk) (Contributions) 20:43, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * When someone reverts an edit telling you to stop doing something, it is not an invitation to simply revert the edit just because you think you are right. The text you were editing was a comment, editors are not concerned about macron use in comments as they do not display on the article. If someone is also telling you not to make pointless edits, it means that your edits are not constructive and are not helping the wiki. Making a big issue out of things simply causes drama and doesn't help the wiki in any way. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 20:57, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * It's actually funny. What you were editing did not appear on the page, it was something called an HTML comment. The comment was only for editors who edited the article, it did not change the page's appearance and was put there as a last resort to stop vandalism edits. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 21:13, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * The reason why Sajuuk won't stop despite your reasoning because it is his job to manage and clean the wiki. Trust me, there are a lot of things I find inconsistent on the wiki as well, but let's not make a big deal out of it. The text you edited does not show up on the page. It does not matter what one person sees in his/her eyes, it is about the benefit of the wiki. I've seen you even argue with guys like TU3 (who by the way, could have you blocked in an instant). All I'm saying is that it is their job to manage the website. Editors like us, who aren't admins, shouldn't make it any harder on them. I and others may come off as rude, but it is for the benefit of the wiki. The text you edited doesn't show up, so let us (myself included) not try to make drama out of little things, like Sajuuk said. Have a nice day. WindStar7125  WindStar7125 Task.svg (Talk) (Contributions) 21:25, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Believe me, I understand, but we cannot correct every wrong thing on the wiki. And I didn't say only you make it harder on anyone. And no, it is Sajuuk's job to clean up things, he's a rollback, he can do things we cannot. And the text didn't show up and didn't affect the article in any matter, so @iloveinoxx, was the issue so big and bad for you to get mad at Sajuuk and I, then take it to our talkpages? We only came off as rude because we were both annoyed with the constant editing over the same article. I know not one person or elite can edit the wiki alone, but one editor or a group of editors can't keep insisting on what they feel is right all the time. People have different viewpoints, so the purpose of the elite is to have them settle on one viewpoint. And if they have to "smash every newcomer" then so be it, because a lot of new editors recently have made stupid edits that have nothing to do with Naruto. I'm not going to defend everything sysops and rollbacks do, but then again, they are trusted to be sysops and rollbacks for a reason. WindStar7125  WindStar7125 Task.svg (Talk) (Contributions) 21:40, August 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * In case it matters, SuperSajuuk and WindStar should not have reverted your edit.
 * Is it necessary for a hidden comment to be 100% accurate? No. But that's no excuse to revert changes that make it accurate.
 * So I apologize for their besmirching your actions. ~SnapperTo 22:48, August 16, 2014 (UTC)