Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-1732320-20160111174438/@comment-1207741-20160206183251

Munchvtec wrote: What you're doing makes things difficult to find. Users should be able to type something in and in return, get something. No offense to you but it would appear as though you have no regard for what others want. :/ like, what if I wanted to find lists of all those academy students listed in the recent might guy episodes? I can't, the only place I believe them to be are in a long dead thread. You're hitting on the problem, though. These unnamed topics, by virtue of being unnamed, can only be found with difficulty. There's nothing simple that can be searched for like a name, so if you wish to find information on these topics you will need to turn to one of these other articles anyway. Unnamed jutsu? Look up the character who used it. Unnamed character? Look up chapter/episode they appeared in or some other character they interacted with. And if these articles that readers are needing to look up anyway are just as informative as the dedicated article on the unnamed topic, then the dedicated article ceases to be useful.

Munchvtec wrote: You say the info can be placed elsewhere. It absolutely could yet this is true for literally every single article. Everything can be combined with other pages. But not every article is a sentence long. You're equating topics like Naruto Uzumaki with Akane's Father, which is nonsense.

Sarutobii2 wrote: Those Anbu are being listed as being the same character not just because of the same mask, there listed as the same characters because of multiple factors, namely same hairstyle and being partners. That pretty much confirms there 1 and the same. And their deaths are explained as...?

Sarutobii2 wrote: In each of these examples, you are holding the wiki and its content to some basic standard: quality of imagery; correctness of content; limitation of triviacruft. Yet when it comes to the actual articles, you and/or other users advocate either no limitations or subjectiveness based on whether or not that topic is related to a main character. The wiki should have standards in all sectors, not just some. Which is what I and other users are attempting to do.
 * Changing a image to higher quality isn't an issue, its an improvement.
 * A character being incorrectly depicted is an issue, hence my intervention.
 * A user being disruptive is an issue, if it wasn't users wouldn't be sending him messages.

Sarutobii2 wrote: And my argument is deleting these unnamed articles isn't beneficial to the wiki, as opposed to them staying as is, which is more beneficial for the sake of recording the series. Not every piece of information warrants its own article. I think some of the ninja seen in File:Chapter 489.jpg have interesting designs (Swamp Thing-like, Himura Kenshin-like, Oompa Loompa-like), yet I'm aware there's nothing to really say about any of them. And so while the wiki would certainly not be harmed by these ninja having their own articles, it would not benefit either.

Can you honestly say that all of these articles on unnamed topics benefit the wiki? Or that mentioning them in another article would be harmful?