User talk:Light-Revan

Hello Light-Revan, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Naruto: The Cross Roads page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- ShounenSuki (Talk) 10:42, 13 October 2011

Re: Itachi Uchiha
Understood.—Cerez365™ 14:13, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Sword of Totsuka
I never said it shouldn't. It's already in the Susanoo article. As far as it being the Sword of Totsuka...it was shown as a gourd nothing more, nothing less. Adding it to the Sword of Totsuka article will only lead to you having to add something like: "However, the sword would probably be just a regular Susanoo Sword instead of the Sword of Totsuka seeming unique to Itachi's Susanoo"

which is lending itself to unnecessary speculation. Once again Sasuke's is not an "adaptation" it was (hopefully) just an error/oversight.--Cerez365™ 17:09, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

And like I said, but apparently it didn't register to you, it's already mentioned in the Susanoo article in order to limit speculation. In order to avoid conflict i'll just edit your revision to reflect such.--Cerez365™ 17:52, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

That's what 'limit speculation' means though friend. Now I'm not even sure you understand any at all. Simply saying that Sasuke's Susanoo was shown with a gourd should be enough without saying "similar to the gourd of the Sword of Totsuka" The note wouldn't be in the article if there weren't similarities.--Cerez365™ 18:25, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

Cerez from Denmark?
Ingen. All of that's just a happy coincidence.--Cerez365™ 20:06, March 1, 2012 (UTC)


 * Have a good one yourself fren.--Cerez365™Hyūga Symbol.svg 20:53, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Time Regression
Since your message pertains more to that topic than anything directed at me, I'll reply to it at length at the talk page. I only deleted the actual page, not the talk page where the discussion is going on. I deleted it less due to me not thinking that is in fact a time regression (but also because of that), but because as this is a very delicate thing to list, since it was decided to list things from that scene as anime. Saying "this is time regression" out of nowhere from the video game will only confuse those who know nothing about it, and will certainly attract people who will create revert wars, as this is a very polarising topic in forums. Simply refraining from mentioning it both gives time for the matter to be discussed, and for more information to be revealed (though I don't think new information will come in this case). I would have been less against this if this had been kept as game only content. My replies to your arguments will be at Talk:Time Regression. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 02:13, March 3, 2012 (UTC)