Board Thread:Boruto Discussions/@comment-43689784-20200520151938/@comment-44914736-20200601021123

Babyfriend1 wrote: This is really just a semantic thing. You both agree about what the sharingan can do. It's just that one of you calls it copying and the other calls it learning with the advantage of knowing how it works so why is this even being argued?

Not really Babyfriend. The Sharingan is like a copy machine. A page from a anatomy book gets scanned and you can make a copy in seconds. You don't have to read what's on the paper your copying or even watch the machine as it makes the copies. Now lets say you don't have access to a copy machine so instead you have to get information from the book for yourself. You have to get a pen and write out each word and sentence on the paper by hand. Now you have to look at the words and sentences on the paper and you have to put in the time to finish writing everything you want on your paper. Big difference vs copy and doing something yourself.

But I'm moving past this discussion. I feel like I'm arguing with children who failed elementary school. Don't understand what the word facts mean or even if the facts prove them right or wrong they just want to be right about everything.

I mentioned above that manga can have wrong translations and with the context of the conversation its not clear so it doesn't proof me or him right. No doubt after this he will post something else about how his "proof" verifies what he is saying. I have no problem whatsoever admitting I'm wrong but I need verified facts not speculative word play and conversations from unverified translated material.

I'm looking more for stimulating conversations on Naruto subjects and like minded people who can admit they are wrong when shown proof and vice versa. When that is over move on to the next subject of interest. Not interested in talking with a wall(Squinty97). I got lots of walls in my home so I can do that anytime if I wanted. I want Naruto wiki to be awesome but it seems like a bunch of children are running things and determine whats "true" and what's "false" More than that is it seems verified material on this wiki is thrown out the window in the event of moderators wanting to win an argument. No guidelines on determining fact or using dictionary correctly or when its obvious using common sense in situations where answers were not provided by Kishimoto but by reality.

If anyone wants to have serious legitimate factual conversations and arguments hit me up anytime. No kiddy arguments or conversations. Also if your preschooler find another hobby and stay off wikis.