Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-7292165-20141222035905

Some of the ages in the infobox pertaining to Shippūden have been irking me. Some of them aren't accurate. We know when Naruto left for his training with Jiraiya for two and a half years it was in January between 1-18 as any further in the month would up the age of Gaara being 14 but he was 13 when Naruto left along with the other Konoha 11 and Sasuke. Now two and half years later, meaning Naruto returned in July between 1-18. Almost two years later Naruto turns 17 on October 10th. Assuming that everything was wrapped up in the next day after the war the last date would be October 11th when the series ended.

People from January 19 through all of June of the year Naruto returned would have already been three years older from Part I. Sakura for example would be 16 not 15 when Naruto returned. Databook was wrong. July-December of the year that Naruto returned people from Part I would be three years older who follow in this time. The year after, January-October 11th people would be 4 years older from Part I.

People who try and put all their faith into the databooks would only see that it leads to too many flaws. Now its reliable but not highly, not as much as it contradicted the manga.

People who's ages need to be changed:

- Part II: 15-17 (Current) – Part II: 16-17 (Updated) - Part II: 16-18 (Current) – Part II: 17-18 (Updated) - Part II: 15-17 (Current) – Part II: 16-17 (Updated) - Part II: 27-28 (Current) – Part II: 27-29 (Updated) - Part II: 30-32 (Current) – Part II: 31-32 (Updated) - Part II: 31-33 (Current) – Part II: 32-33 (Updated)
 * 03/28 – Sakura Haruno
 * 03/09 – Tenten
 * 01/19 – Gaara
 * 06/21 – Kotetsu Hagane
 * 03/20 – Ibiki Morino
 * 01/06 – Ebisu

There are a few others. We are all about trying to keep the flow and accuracy. However the databook contradicted the timeline. This needs to be addressed. 