User talk:Jacce

Kakashi
When Kakashi Used the technique Eight Gates? Lidor

Naruto Shippuden movie 2: Bonds
When the movie is gonna come out? Lidor

Chapter 440
In page 8(If I'm not mistaken), Minato said that he sealed HALF of the Nine Tailed-Fox chakra in Naruto. So where is the other half? Lidor

Shikamaru
Shikamaru is smoking? Lidor

Kakashi Hatake
Does Kakashi REALLY know 1000 teqniques? Lidor

Kakashi
When Kakashi Used the technique Eight Gates? Lidor

Naruto Shippuden movie 2: Bonds
When the movie is gonna come out? Lidor

Chapter 440
In page 8(If I'm not mistaken), Minato said that he sealed HALF of the Nine Tailed-Fox chakra in Naruto. So where is the other half? Lidor

Shikamaru
Shikamaru is smoking? Lidor

Kakashi Hatake
Does Kakashi REALLY know 1000 teqniques? Lidor

RE: Kakashi
Kakashi used Eight Gates ( he only opened one of them), during his rock climbing after the Chunin exams, I don't really know the episode but I saw him do it.

Last qustion
One last quick thing, why are the mangas on the site u showed me three digits long like 440 441 442 in the US when the manga co We out it's two digits like volume 44 or vol 41 vol 32 what's the extra number reffer to? Like chapters with the volume? Thanks 137.151.175.72 04:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Manof100fires

Editing Question
I recently edited Obito Uchiha's list of jutsu to include Sharingan, which he obviously had. When I noticed you had edited it recently, I checked back and found that you had removed it. Could you juset tell me why, I have no wish to start an editing war. Leave a message on my talk page. Dozla 15:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Naruto and Minato
When Minato fix the seal he said that it's the last time he meet Naruto, So if Naruto has eight tails again Minato won't be able to stop him? Lidor

Fire Release: Toad Oil Flame Bullet
When Naruto used that technique? Lidor

Naruto
When Naruto in his normal form, Does he still a S-class ninja? Lidor

Sharingan
What are the three techniques of the Sharingan? Lidor

Marking profiles for deletion?
Am I supposed to mark a user profile for deletion if I find it violating the rules set up for them, or is the marking only for pages with Naruto content? Hakinu 20:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Block
75.6.225.254 - Removed all info frm Itachi's pg, and replaced wit "he's gay wit kisame" AlienGamer


 * 71.203.73.99 - Changed Background info to "blah blah blah"AlienGamer


 * 68.98.248.137 - U need to c for u'r self wat he did to Madara Uchiha'a Page...Utter bullshit...check it out, anyway..its so stupid its funny AlienGamer


 * 88.238.61.147‏ - Completely Vandalised Sakura's Page AlienGamer
 * U might want to think about a permenant ban for the above....after he got a 3 day ban frm Dantman He Erased all contents frm Kakashi's page plus Minato's page....and i'm curious...i thought blockin stopped these users frm editin...after dantman blocked him, how did he manage to edit kakashi's and minato's pg??? AlienGamer
 * I answered my own question...he changed his IP....if it mite help, there's a software called HotSpot Shoeld, that changes u'r IP....anyway...he now uses 88.238.73.55AlienGamer
 * 12.208.75.235 - Rinnegan PageAlienGamer


 * 69.118.56.188 for Vandalism on Rasengan and Sharingan among others, just revert everything he's done.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 23:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 74.232.51.209, look at my talkpage history for why.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 01:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 24.2.120.227, wiping Sasuke's page.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 20:54, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Nevermind the last one. ShounenSuki got him.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 21:15, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Please block Miyuki uchiha for repeat vandalisum.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 21:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Please block 97neji for repeat vandalisum.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 01:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Momoy123 - Removed all contents frm the sasuke Uchihia page AlienGamer Talk

naruto Jutsu Wiki
Hi Jacce. I am starting a new site, called Naruto Jutsu Wiki (www.narutojutsu.wikia.com). Could you please help me with editing. I trust you enough for your help, so i will make you a admin (if i figure out how). Thank you!--NejiByakugan360 17:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC) Please respond n my user talk page on Naruto Jutsu Wiki.

Hey!!
Hey Jacce ^^!

Well, i want to tell you that i have a big problem with other user and i just wanna know if we can discuss about it because it's startings to bothering me!

Hope we can talk about it! :)

--Kiba91 01:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, i have the problem that the user Snapper2 or smth like that is always changing what i did and others users did with Kiba's page; and i think that it was great, that the information was right and it was useful, but because i don't know why he keeps change it! Because he thinks it is better in that way and bla bla! And know, a user called Dantman changed it again the way Snapper want and it also blocked it!

And i would now if we can discuss about what it's important in Kiba's page and stuff like that because Snapper and Dantman leave only almost one line in each section! Also about they blocked is not fair because they get tired of changed because i think of the way they want!

Hope you understand and sorry for bothering you ^^'

--Kiba91 01:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * You can ignore this one Jacce, Kiba91 sidestepped any proper community discussion and jumped to the admin who hasn't looked over his improper communication. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 2, 2009 @ 02:44 (UTC)

Plot: Naruto Shippuuden
Why? If you ask me, the content I added was helpful to those who did not wish to go through the whole page in order to know the unresolved plot threads so far. Plus I was planning to link the content to the respective page sections, reference the data and add a section on the people who have died in Chranological Order. All relevent to the plot. More people have died in the Shippuuden era than during Part 1. Everything I wrote is relevent to the plot.

Why did you immediately shoot down my idea? If you think it was redundancy then it isn't. People would like it if they could access info without going through multiple topics. You didn't even bother to discuss it. I can make sure that no incorrect info is added. I regularly visit so I can delete incorrect data. Please restore my work so I can improve on it. I'm requesting you to do it instead of doing it myself because I have no desire to usurp your authority and have no wish to get into an argument. Please restore my work before someone else edits the page and I have to do everything all over again. At the very least restore it untill a discussion can take place. Thank You. - Zero - Talk 06:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Specualation is defined as making guesses based on revealed data. What I wrote was simply a statement of the plot threads that had not been resolved as of yet. It was completely, 100% true and not speculation. You can ask Dantman if you wish but please restore the facts I wrote or give me permission to do so. I shall take full responsibility if Dantman objects. - Zero - Talk 06:57, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

That's why I named the topics as Unresolved Plot Threads (so far). It means that untill now these plot threads have not been completed. Plus I phrased each point as a question. How exactly is that guessing? It's a basic statement of the facts that these plot threads haven't been completed as of yet. Even if they remain unresolbved untill the end. They will be unresolved and thus belong in that section. It will be a fact that those plot threads were unresolved untill the end. That is not speculation. Read my edits carefully. Yoiu'll see for yourself what I'm talking about. Please restore my work or allow me to do so. I know what I am doing. - Zero - Talk 07:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

That's precisely my point. Everything is written but it is so mixed up with everything else that it can pass unnoticed. Creating a seperate section for things like this ensures that data can be accessed easily and quickly. This way everyone can know that the metioned plot threads are still to be resolved or havn't been resolved as of yet. It's the basic rule of information presentation. Mention imporatant points seperately even if it is repitition. And you have to admit that Unresolved Plot Threads are important. So can I restore it please, or will you do the honors? Come on. Trust me on this. I mean look at the character pages. You could say that the data on jutsu/techniques are present in it's plot section but the data is still written seperately in another section as well. So why not in the Naruto Shippuuden Plot as well? You have to admit that it is the logical step to take.

Also, I'm also going to add a list of names of the characters who have died, sorted chronologicallyby death course. There is a lot of data that has to be added. Plus haven't you noticed that m ost of the pages in this wiki have little to no pics. Especially the Plot pages. There's lots to do and if you keep deleteing things like this then noone will get the resolve needed to add things at all. So what do you say? Can I? - Zero - Talk 08:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * : I wouldn't say it's speculation, nor would I say it's something we normally put on the wiki. It doesn't actually make any unconfirmed statements or guesses, but rather presents the guesses in a list. Then again, there are a few notes that aren't neutral enough, and other notes:


 * "(Depending on what happens to him, Though there is a very low chance of it being the latter)" would be speculation
 * Danzou (bad romanization)
 * "Unresolved Plot Threads (so far)" What happened to never using "current", something that is "so far" kind of falls under the scope of "current" that we want to avoid.
 * Best thing to do would be to make a few neutral statements on the talkpage and see what other community members's opinions on if we should be putting an unresloved plot pieces list into the article. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 1, 2009 @ 18:11 (UTC)

Very well. We shall move this discussion to it's respective talk page. - Zero - Talk 04:02, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

huh?
Why did you blocked my IP adress? Lidor

...
217.132.80.8 Lidor

...
I didn't see any edit wars and what false information exectly? all the informatin was true!!!! Lidor

Signature
Umm... Jacce. Do you mind customizing your signature to include a direct link to your talk page? - Zero - Talk 04:22, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Madara Uchiha
In Madara's page Snapper2 deleted the subjects in the abilities, Why? Lidor

Naruto 442
Where I can read Naruto 442? Lidor

Frog Katas
It is possible that the Nature Manipulation of Frog Katas is Wind? Lidor

Hashirama Senju
How old Hashirama Senju was when he become hokage? LIdor

User Page
Jacce, should 7th Body have a user page? All he's contributed to the wiki is through Talk pages.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 19:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Page
Why did you delete my User Page? --7th Body (talk) 20:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)7th Body--7th Body (talk) 20:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Re Page
Oh okay thanks.

Shadow Clone Jutsu
Why the heck did you put the protection on that page? Naruto DIDN'T use the fox's chakra when making those almost 2,000 clones, that was all him. He used the fox's chakra once he summoned the Boss Toad, yet you won't listen to me. Ask someone else, they will tell you the same thing. Please change the page back. - Juubi no Ryuu

Yes I know Naruto had ACCESS to the fox's chakra the whole time, he just never USED the chakra for the clones, only for summoning the Boss Toad and for escaping from Gaara's sand. It is like how Sasuke during the fight with Gaara didn't use the Curse Seal until almost the end with his Chidori, or during his fight with Naruto, did he use the Curse Seal to make the Fireball on top of the hospital? Please get your facts right, Naruto could have used the fox's chakra but he didn't, he used his own chakra to make the clones even though he could have used the demon fox's. - Juubi no Ryuu

The Contract
Who are the two people that sign the contrect with the toads? LIdor

Byyyyy the way.
Do you mind checking if my user page's content is ok? Thank you~ Hakinu (talk) 16:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)