User talk:Rachin123

re: infobox
The fourth databook says they're 12, so they're 12. ~SnapperTo 17:59, January 20, 2016 (UTC)

re: delete
Unless it's a jpg being replaced with a png, I usually let old images sit around Special:Unusedimages for a while in case somebody likes the old image better for whatever reason. If another sysop doesn't do it before then, I'll probably delete them next week. ~SnapperTo 17:51, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

Hello Rachin, how are you? I have a question for you MadaraUciha12 (talk) 13:05, January 25, 2016 (UTC)

MlGshinobi
and a few others, need to be watched they are starting to belittle and mock other users on the vs forums. QuakingStar (talk) 18:43, February 2, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Image Uploads
If your using Youtube, I simply just change the quality to HD.-- 4th Six Paths (talk) 05:15, February 4, 2016 (UTC)


 * Even if the image is okay, there might be another image that has higher quality and that's what I found. If you look closely at the quality of both images than you can see.--Rinnegan.svg 4th Six Paths (talk) 02:19, February 9, 2016 (UTC)


 * Some of mine are 1080p and show clear vision.--Rinnegan.svg 4th Six Paths (talk) 02:25, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Hey I see that you are replacing images with ones that are nearly identical with little or no change to them. Please refer to the Narutopedia:Image policy. If you are going to replace images then please don't replace them with ones that actually show some difference otherwise you will just be re-uploading ones that are identical.--Tuxedo12 (talk) 02:32, March 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * You're enhancing images? That would still go against the image policy. "Images that have been edited (other than for simple resizing or cropping), will all be deleted unconditionally." --Sarutobii2 (talk) 08:02, March 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * I get what you mean. But back to what tux said, your versions are identical to the naked eye, as i spent 5 minutes trying to look for a difference in the new versions of this and this, and it looks exactly the same. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 16:34, March 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand that the file is different, but if you need to zoom in or use a magnifying glass to notice a difference, it's not really needed. But do what you must. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 17:39, March 23, 2016 (UTC)

SuperSaiyaMan
He keeps edit warring, I tried adding the feat of blocking Kirin to Itachi's page and he keeps undoing it and saying all I do is exaggerate when Black Zetsu clearly said that natural lightning strikes at 1/1000th of a second, it even says it on Kirin's page. LSSJ and SuperSaiyaMan hate Itachi and its very clear from the threads they are commenting on and from the edit warring from SuperSaiyaMan, he is acting like he is a moderator when all he is is a rollback... can you step in please?? QuakingStar (talk) 20:44, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

re: highlight
I can't any longer (not a forum op anymore). You can either ask NeedleJizo or a sysop. 03:17, February 17, 2016 (UTC)

~Momo
Yo, Momo, do you ever check the messages you receive from other wikis? :P--Ghostrick142 (talk) 19:55, February 17, 2016 (UTC)

RE: Thankyou
No prob :) --Sarutobii2 (talk) 03:15, February 19, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Wait a minute
Unfortunately yes, yes it is. I heard they might've used their budget on the Itachi arc, but that is hardly an excuse for a desaster on this scale. Norleon (talk) 05:00, February 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that writing couldn't be safed by animations even on par with those of the fight Kakashi vs Obito, or better. Let's just hope Itachi's arc will make up for it. :/ Norleon (talk) 05:13, February 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yup, I can enjoy filler when they are well written and produced, like the Kakashi Anbu arc. This, however, is the worst. I can't even say that it had potential, it could've told a good what-if story with Minato and the Uchiha still alive, but they fucked it up completely, eliminating every potential from the very beginning. Just horrible. Norleon (talk) 05:29, February 19, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Favor
Uh, what exactly do you want me to do? You skipped the verb. I'm assuming you want it deleted? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:09, February 20, 2016 (UTC)

UN
Obvi. Otherwise i wouldn't have added it. lol. Orochimaru, Gaara, Tsunade, and Jiraiya all summon their summons/Shukaku for a short time that you play as.--AskinNakkLeVaar (talk) 05:40, February 20, 2016 (UTC)

That fellow
The ghosttrick user is Omojuze. Munchvtec (talk) 10:04, February 21, 2016 (UTC)

Hello, how are you? xD I have a request to make me glad :) MadaraUciha12 (talk) 16:12, February 29, 2016 (UTC)

Boruto
At what point in the movie? I'd like it to be true but I've seen the movie and never remember him pushing out chakra. The only example anyone has brought up was his missed strike against Skidai, but no chakra was released. --JavelinR (talk) 11:52, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

RE: Thanks
Well we need more rollbacks since some are not as active as they use to be since the series ended, and it doesn't help that half the sysops are inactive/busy to deal with vandalism. Just remember to read this and welcome to the club :) --Sarutobii2 (talk) 19:33, March 4, 2016 (UTC)

Forum
Gotcha. QuakingStar (talk) 02:38, March 10, 2016 (UTC)

Those people called me biased in the past and you didn't do anything.--Minato 87 (talk) 22:29, March 10, 2016 (UTC)

Forum Warnings
Yo. I just wanted to let you know that there's a template which forum mods can use to give warnings to users. You can see the template here:. The usage instructions are available there. This simplifies the giving of warnings (and also makes it easier to see how close a user will be to a block). Hope this helps! :D --SuperSajuuk (talk) 12:23, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * The "reasons" are given through the policy parameter. And the template auto-includes your signature when used on a page, so don't worry about signing it. :P --SuperSajuuk (talk) 07:18, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * Minor note: when using the template, make sure to use SUBST: at the front, eg:
 * Subst'ing is required to include the signature when it's used (which means you don't need to manually sign, as it is included in the template). --Sajuuk 14:52, April 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Subst'ing is required to include the signature when it's used (which means you don't need to manually sign, as it is included in the template). --Sajuuk 14:52, April 2, 2016 (UTC)

Ages
I don't know why you added wrong ages to (as I suppose) multiple character infoboxes, but I can count on you to revert them to the ages given only by the databooks, yeah? :) • Seelentau 愛 議 21:08, March 26, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yay or nay? • Seelentau 愛 議 19:10, March 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm saying that it's not our job to correct the manga. We display the information as provided by the official sources, even if it's wrong. We collect information, we do not tamper with it. So please correct the ages so that only the databook ages are left. • Seelentau 愛 議 19:45, March 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * I know, but ages are an entirely different thing. If the databook says "All genjutsu are Yin Release" and a genjutsu user isn't listed as using Yin Release, it's clearly a mistake. When it comes to dates and ages, however, it's not that clear, mostly because there's no established timeline. We have no grounds for correcting those mistakes. Otherwise, I would've converted my timeline into an official article years ago. • Seelentau 愛 議 19:54, March 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * "There's no way" is not the strongest argument. Even the databooks themselves don't follow a real timeline, they just add a year (or two in case of the timeskip) each time, or sometimes they don't change the age at all (something I only discovered yesterday ._.). Again, we have no grounds to calculate the ages, looking at stuff like the Kakashi problem or Hiruzen randomly being one year older during part 1, even though his birthday doesn't fit. So please correct the ages and remove fan calculations. • Seelentau 愛 議 20:13, March 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * Don't know, I'm on vacation until Tuesday, can't access my databooks^^ Will look into this later, maybe translating some of the minor characters from db4... or maybe not, knowing me^^ Anyways, thank you for your understanding :) • Seelentau 愛 議 22:07, March 27, 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, most of the db4 translations were posted on NF. But it's so weird, I noticed the wrong ages when I randomly checked a minor character's age in the db4 and noticed how it didn't change from db3. So I'll probably go over all minor character ages again, to see what's going on there... hopefully, we didn't simply add +1 to every character's age... and what about 10th October? The problem is that the earlier databooks weren't that specific with when exactly they end, they just state the volume. Therefore, we can't calculate the ages and everything :/ • Seelentau 愛 議 17:40, March 29, 2016 (UTC)

Hi
Hello Rai! xD MadaraUciha12 (talk) 15:30, March 28, 2016 (UTC)

8Gates is flaming in the forums
http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:198747#230 And what's more, I think he's duping for QuakingStar, his posting style is just too similar.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 21:38, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * He flamed again in the Sasuke vs Obito topic.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 22:19, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks like he's disregarding your warning and is getting a bit more aggressive again.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 23:15, April 3, 2016 (UTC)

Infobox redirects
Why exactly would you need to search for an infobox when on mobile? You can just go to the article and click the edit button (and it's there on the Wikia Mobile skin), which will take you directly to the infobox. Creating redirects in non-mainspace namespaces is pointless, they will never get linked anywhere and will invariably be deleted by someone as an unused redirect. --Sajuuk 20:51, April 3, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Askin
Looking at the file, it doesn't really look poor quality to me, even more so if it really is from an artbook. What I do think is better about using that image, it's that's a full body image, non-Edo Tensei, non-dojutsu reflecting Six Paths of Pain. The ideal image in my opinion would be one of those character artworks from the games. About four of them were uploaded yesterday. Deidara, Sasori, Pain, and Hanzo. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 05:44, April 20, 2016 (UTC)

Just letting you know.
XShadyShadow is going to be a problem, in fact he already is. Please advise him to watch his tone, he won't get insulted if he doesn't insult :) QuakingStar (talk) 20:10, April 20, 2016 (UTC)

Debunking how strong Itachi is.
Excuse me Mr, Raichin but I, Tengen Toppa Ita-Sasuke have come here because I have a question for you. Today, on the now-deleted called "Debunking how strong Itachi is.," you reprimanded ShadyShadow and QuakingStar for their uncalled-for words. However, I am curious about something, as such, my question is as follows: Why didn't you chew me out for what I said? My exact words are in the photo that is below this line?

I know it was not exactly a relevant question, but just thought that I would ask since I was curious. Tengen Toppa Ita-Sasuke (talk) 23:55, April 20, 2016 (UTC)

Re: lol
Thank you for your concern, I will keep it in mind. :) • Seelentau 愛 議 20:15, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * By the way, your opinion on this topic would be appreciated. • Seelentau 愛 議 09:04, April 28, 2016 (UTC)

re: jpg
I don't recall ever linking you to jpg images. Are you talking about this? Because you have like, 616 to replace. 04:13, May 3, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Sources
Yo. No sources were provided for the Japanese names, hence "unsourced". We record the manga, not an english adaptation of it.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 20:59, May 6, 2016 (UTC)

Naruto Chapter
Rather than filling up the wiki activity feed, i think it would be better leaving a bot to rename the refs to Naruto Chapter imo. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 09:05, May 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't see any purpose in this. True a Boruto manga exists, but rather than going and updating thousands of chapter references across the wiki, why not just name all Boruto manga chapter references? People are going to know that any reference that just says Chapter X are references for the main Naruto manga. --Sajuuk 09:29, May 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * When was this "agreed"? The only thread I recall is a thread discussing to remove the word "Naruto" from references, because it was unnecessary to be mentioned. --Sajuuk 09:53, May 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * You cannot compare infoboxes to references. Infoboxes need a separation, because it would mess with SMW data, causing all sorts of silly output. References are just references and there is no need to specify "Naruto" in references referring to the Naruto manga, because this wiki started out covering Naruto, therefore it's got the priority over newer manga. --Sajuuk 10:38, May 7, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Talkpage Input
Done. ^_^ Munchvtec (talk) 06:44, May 29, 2016 (UTC)
 * Would you mind taking a look here? Munchvtec (talk) 06:47, May 29, 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks mate. Munchvtec (talk) 06:55, May 29, 2016 (UTC)
 * Of course. May I ask, in return, for you to give input for this? I've bumped it a few times, and getting it going seems rare. I'd appreciate it, thanks. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 06:51, May 29, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Excuse me
I know very well how he acts, but telling him to seek medical assistance is just too much. I didn't plan to make you out to be the bad guy, I just wanted to make sure you get your calm again, because I know you're above such statements. Norleon (talk) 00:06, June 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I indeed think it's over the top to wish someone therapy because of what they write in an internet forum. Does that mean I agree with his antics? No I don't, if it would go as I wish, he would've been blocked for a long time already, he got told often enough to restrain himself after all. Thing is just, he isn't blocked yet, for whatever reasons. So how do we handle him? Getting personal, just as he does so often? I don't think that contributes to anything. Norleon (talk) 07:10, June 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * And I am very dissapointed to see you going that way, regardless of being moderator or not. But if that's how you think things work the best for you, then fine. Norleon (talk) 07:22, June 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh no, I would never demand that. Glad to see it came to this, and don't worry, no offence was ever taken. :)
 * Have a nice day! Norleon (talk) 08:29, June 4, 2016 (UTC)