Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-34700383-20180829185752/@comment-34700383-20180925172832

Quote exactly where I’ve misconstrued canon. What I have debunked is the I illogical ‘included on the page’ claim. A claim that’s both wrong factually wrong and works against you. What I have proven is that the juubi power is necessary for rikudo sagehood.

I’ve thoroughly rebutted all your counters to the point where you chose to move on to the next arguing point. That means there was a concession on your end, as you couldn’t prove your claims. But rupiah think that bring something up 30 or 100 comments later somehow changes what was previously said.

There’s nothing on this thread that I’ve presented that’s been warped or taken out of its original context, whereas every person subscribing to the very consensus you defend, is guilty that themselves. That’s because of the agreed notion that the databook image’ meaning is other what what the page states it to be. This is wrong people. Wake up and realize how bad that logic is. If a newspaper said a tragedy happened and showed an image of a person or group people, are they the perpetrators or victim? It’s impossible to know with the necessary context. That’s is your preconceived notion and that is why your consensus is wrong.

There is more evidence that exists today than when rsm was first shown. I get that you based your conclusions on what information was available then, why can’t that be done again now?

I’ve said more than once that I used to believe your viewpoint to be true. So claiming I don’t understand you isn’t true. I’m here to present information. Taking an objective look at that information, that’s the reason why we’re here.

Do you understand why the consensus is wrong? In criminal investigations the information known the clearly things get. Take the same approach here. Look at all that we know TODAY. Feel free to apply that information to the consensus, but it will start poking holes.