Talk:Naruto Uzumaki

Jinchūriki Status Revisited
Okay. Considering the recent chapters, such as 695 and 696, where Naruto summons a Kurama avatar and is only communicating with Yin-Kurama and no other tailed beasts, is it safe to say Naruto is the jinchūriki of only Yin-Kurama and the pseudo-jinchūriki of the other tailed beasts? Considering he has Kurama the tailed beast within him and just the chakras of the other tailed beasts? • WindStar7125     16:31, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * There is no such thing as "pseudo-jinchuriki", it is a fanmade term. He was called Jinchuriki of all TB by Sasuke. • Seelentau 愛 議 16:38, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * That was a fanmade term? I thought that was a term used in the anime (considering the whole Sora situation). • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 16:41, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * Naruto: Shippūden episode 68 uses the term "人柱力もどき" (jinchūrikimodoki), which is translated as "simulated jinchūriki" in the English TV. It was something introduced in the anime with Sora, but was more-or-less canonized when Kinkaku and Ginkaku were shown to have absorbed Kurama's chakra without being jinchūriki themselves. Also, with Naruto, while only Kurama is sealed inside him the others can manifest in his mental world. Arawn 999 (talk) 16:56, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * Tau, what chapter did Sasuke confirm Naruto was in fact the jinchūriki of all tailed beasts? Help me out, I don't remember. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 17:01, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * The Kingin Brothers are called Jinchuriki in the manga. WindStar, it was shortly before the two went off to fight. • Seelentau 愛 議 17:06, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * @Windy, first page of chapter 693. Seel 's right. --Mangekyō Sharingan Izuna.svg JOA20 17:17, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

Naruto's Powers and Abilities section header: Sasuke
I hate to be that guy (you probably expected this would happen), but I have to point out that Naruto technically fought Sasuke to a draw. Sasuke did admit defeat, but this was clearly more of an ideological defeat - Naruto managed to thwart Sasuke's plans and change his way of thinking - "bring him back" as he had always said he would. So this was more of a victory of will than a victory of power - as you have definitely seen, both Naruto and Sasuke were left in a practically identical state, so I suggest a slight change of wording to something like "Naruto managed to fight Sasuke to a tie with the latter admitting defeat" or something. This was definitely not like say, Hashirama vs Madara where the victor was clear and apparent. Xfing (talk) 21:33, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * So do you want one of us to remove "Naruto defeated Sasuke" and say something like "Naruto finally convinced and redeemed Sasuke?" or something from Sasuke's article as well? •  WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:40, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * If it was truly a draw, Naruto would have been unconscious at the same time as Sasuke. Instead, he was fully conscious and was waiting for Sasuke to wake up after the clash. Sasuke and the manga flat out says Naruto won the battle period, there was no draw.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 02:36, October 30, 2014 (UTC)

The fact Naruto refuses to believe there are winners and losers in a fight between friends like they had doesn't change the fact he stayed conscious whilst Sasuke took a nice long nap. He won that fight.--Reliops (talk) 22:56, October 31, 2014 (UTC)

New Part II image?
The one we currently have is just flat out terrible. Surely there is a better alternative?--Reliops (talk) 22:57, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * How so? • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 22:58, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree with Reliops(His eyes are drawn wrong way) and must add that first part image too need to be replaced(Naruto's hair drawn incorrectly) Rage gtx (talk) 23:04, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * Part I image is fine. No need to remove it. This is a discussion about the Part II image. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 23:06, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * As much as i like the image, the angle of his face is slightly off. So surely we could find a suitable replacement, presumably of him during the Kazekage Rescue Arc. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 23:39, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * I saw this image right here. The issue with it is, there's no information signifying the episode where this image came from. Unless someone can figure out the episode number, it'll be deleted. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 23:43, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * i found this image which shows his entire head. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 23:49, October 31, 2014 (UTC)

I'd argue both those pictures are terrible (The first one gives off a weird douche bag feel. Don't know why. The second one has a very very stupid glow to it.) and I question what exactly is wrong with current image. But that's all just ol' TheUltimate3 gibberish.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 00:12, November 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm not really feeling the new image because other than the picture glow, Naruto's not giving much a smile and seeing as how he's in a cheerful mood (most of the time), that image doesn't seem to sit too well.--SSJ2AJB 00:36, November 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * Then nothing changes? Fine with me. Didn't need to be. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 01:17, November 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the current one is as good as we're going to get. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 01:20, November 1, 2014 (UTC)

The Last: Naruto the Movie
Since this will be a canon movie, maybe add to the canon part of this page? Justin Holland (talk) 00:36, November 2, 2014 (UTC)

Kekkei Mora subtype to Naruto's infobox?
Since he was using Truth-Seeking Ball, it should be added. Come to think of it, we need an icon now for that!--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 03:19, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * No. According to Seelentau, from the databook, Naruto's TSB is not a Kekkei Mōra. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 03:21, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Its not? What sense does that make?--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 03:27, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Doesn't matter if it makes sense or not, that's what Tau got from the databook. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 03:35, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Has the Truth-seeking Ball page been released then? Linkage?--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 03:35, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll explain it like this: Roshi and Son Goku can use Lava Release. Son Goku can use the Kekkei Genkai LR, because the advanced nature comes from his "blood," meaning it originates from him. But LR is not a KG for the jinchūriki Roshi because Lava Release doesn't originate from his blood, but from Son Goku's. The tailed beast has the KG, the jinchūriki does not. Same with Kaguya. Kaguya is the Ten-Tails, a tailed beast. The TSB originates from her blood. Naruto is a jinchūriki. The TSB doesn't come from his blood.


 * Edit: Okay, we'll take this to the forums. Read this comment • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 03:58, November 3, 2014 (UTC)

So who is the one standing and laughing in the end, eh, Narutards? ^_--Elve Talk Page 14:31, November 3, 2014 (UTC)

Just to explain this once again (you can link this to everyone then):

In the new databook, the characters have little icons in their profiles, showing different attributes they have (Jinchuriki, Senjutsu, Kuchiyose, Kekkei Genkai etc.). Among these icons is one for Kekkei Mora. Naruto, who has the icons "Jinchuriki", "Senjutsu" and "Kuchiyose", does not have the Kekkei Mora icon. Unless the TSB article explains it in another way, it means that Naruto doesn't use Kekkei Mora and his TSB is no Kekkei Mora. • Seelentau 愛 議 14:47, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yup, because it's Wind Release _^--Elve Talk Page 15:03, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Who knows. • Seelentau 愛 議 15:06, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Tau's correct. His elements are still up in the air. Hopefully the databook addresses that. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 15:16, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * I thought it already did and he has just Wind listed?--Elve Talk Page 15:27, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, but he also has the TB's natures. He could use them in the TSB. • Seelentau 愛 議 15:29, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^^^That much I agree with. And FF-Suzaku confirmed Naruto has Yin-Yang Release from Hagoromo's power. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 15:37, November 3, 2014 (UTC)

Maybe he doesn't anymore. He used the palm tattoo to do his Jesus wonders, but he no longer has it.--Elve Talk Page 15:42, November 3, 2014 (UTC)

This data book doesn't seem to make much sense based on initial translations. It's probably best to wait for it to be out in its entirety.--Reliops (talk) 19:01, November 3, 2014 (UTC)

Boil release
Forgive me ignorance, but I've got no clue where Naruto got Boil release. Did he use it in a rasenshuriken? I thought he only used Magnet and Lava in the rasenshuriken... Derigar2 (talk) 08:17, November 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * He got it from Kokuō and used it to escape from the ice when fighting Kaguya. He also used nine different types of rasenshuriken against Kaguya at the same time, all which had different compositions.--Soul reaper (talk) 08:33, November 5, 2014 (UTC)


 * The latest Databook reveals that Kokuō (Five-Tails) has Boil Release. When Naruto used Sage Art: Super Tailed Beast Ball Rasenshuriken, one of his Rasenshuriken was Boil Release.--Questionaredude (talk) 08:37, November 5, 2014 (UTC)

Why doesn't that technique say it uses Boil release then? Derigar2 (talk) 10:49, November 5, 2014 (UTC)

Kekkei Genkai
Ok now it's confirmed by new data book that Naruto is both "Jinchuuriki", "Kekkei Genkai" user and having all basic natures in his box. As well as instead of "tailed beast skill" Bijuu use simple ninjutsu. I think Naruto must have Kekkei Genkai field in his infobox./ Rage gtx (talk) 10:44, November 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Why don't other jinchuuriki have it tho?--Elve Talk Page 12:45, November 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Other jinchuuriki not have been listed at all(in way as Naruto) exept Gaara, while their jutsu listed as KKG(Roshi's Lava Release is listed as a Kekkei Genkai. "It's a technique of Four Tails' original Jinchuriki, Roshi." = 四尾の元人柱力・老紫の術だ. - FF-Suzaku)./ Rage gtx (talk) 12:56, November 5, 2014 (UTC)

Mokuton
Prosthetic forearm made from Hashirama DNA do we list him??(Kuroiraikou (talk) 13:40, November 6, 2014 (UTC))


 * Not until he starts throwing out Wood Release.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 13:48, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Orochimaru didn't either, just saying.--Elve Talk Page 13:50, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Good point. Think for Orochimaru it had more to do with how his Reincarnation crap worked.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 13:54, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Unconfirmed prosthetic forearm, or did I miss something? • Seelentau 愛 議 14:00, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * So you suppose that Naruto's got back his arm in a different way and Sasuke was offered a Hash arm alternative for teh lulz?--Elve Talk Page 14:08, November 6, 2014 (UTC)

Unconfirmed yes but lets try and not be silly with this. Tsunade wouldn't just offer a fully developed arm to Sasuke and then look at Naruto and say the best of luck. Implications are there that Tsunade is making new arms for both of them.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 14:11, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Jesus fuck Elve, how often do I have to explain to you that I never, ever, EVER suppose anything? If you guys are saying X, then I'm not saying that X is definitely wrong and Y is true, but only that X is not confirmed. I am not the opposite of you guys, I am the middle of every possibility, as long as nothing is confirmed. -.- • Seelentau 愛 議 14:14, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it's safe to say that Naruto's got Hash arm. If Naruto's arm had been restored some other way, then Sasuke would have been offered the same procedure as him, rather than an alternative--Elve Talk Page 14:31, November 6, 2014 (UTC)

Impact
Maybe we should add how he has affected the world? Justin Holland (talk) 18:36, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * no. Munchvtec (talk) 18:38, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Something like a legacy section, except it's while he's alive? Justin Holland (talk) 18:42, November 6, 2014 (UTC)