User talk:Cerez365

Re: Block
Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:47, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:05, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Archive
From what I can see, there are now two archives which have pretty much the same content, four and five. I'll try making sure that four is properly set up, and then delete five. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:04, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * When you used the archive tool, you selected everything in your talk page. Was that you, or was it a bug? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:06, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

Dance of the Seedling Fern
Some jackass keeps editing it and has now deleted everything but the trivia and left something in spanish which I think they're insulting people ith, also the infobox is filled with spanish crap about a guy named Tom or something, I can't read it. Anyway, figured I'd bring it to your attention and ask if the article can be locked? --Hawkeye2701 (talk) 00:53, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

How do you revert a page? I don't know how. Is there a button or something? --Hawkeye2701 (talk) 01:36, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

yo
hey did you ever try naruto fanon before--✖☯Arctic-Fox☯✖ 12:28, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

really i read them to what's your fav and you should try naruto fanon it's good--✖☯Arctic-Fox☯✖ 13:36, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

i think i read that one you should read mine people say their pretty good.--✖☯Arctic-Fox☯✖ 13:46, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Movements
The image looks good. Almost too good actually. Is that really from the episode? I've seen plenty of fanart which looks even better than the anime, and this colouring reminds me of it. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:26, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

Second Mizukage - References
I think we're both aware that it is pointless and impractical to continue our discussion in such a manner, so I'll instead carry it on here. Firstly, why I find citing over dependency or reliance as a sufficient reason to delete already present and accurate references ridiculous, is simply due to the fact that having to trawl through countless chapters shouldn't impact at all upon the respect a user receives for their edit, a correct edit still remains correct regardless of the method used to achieve it. Whether this involves the use of references to make this process easier, information still remains valid if it appears in an official source, it is on this accuracy alone that the worth of most edits is judged not on the effort put into gaining it.

However, if I am mistaken and you are instead under the impression that references make users lazy because they can find information more easily and thus, are less likely to add it, then I would really have to refute this. Anyway, before I continue on with this point at great length and end up making claims which you never meant to imply, which I believe would be really unfair to you as you're typically rather civil, could you please explain more clearly why you find references so deplorable. Blackstar1 (talk) 21:21, July 20, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification but I never disputed the fact that the previous system worked, I just believe that the addition of references could be an improvement to it, making it not only easier for the majority of users to locate when events were occurring but also for editors like you and myself, when it came to corrections and confirmations. Just because such a system isn't employed throughout the entirety of the wiki, doesn't mean that its implementation elsewhere isn't worthwhile, especially in circumstances such as these where a character's appearances are so fragmented and sporadic (with a gap of over 20 chapters in one place, while still within a single arc). I think what I found hardest to believe though, was that you favoured the deletion of already existing references in spite of being aware that this would make it more difficult for others in the long run, when in this case you knew that the article was unlikely to become overcrowded with references because as you put it "he appears in one arc and will probably never be seen outside of it", something I whole heartedly agree with. I guess that we really need to come up with a more defined an acceptable policy for the use of references, as I can't promise that I won't add them in a similar manner in the future, due to my experience in how much time they can save when it comes to edits, which can then be employed better elsewhere.


 * Also, I never add references per paragraph, I've always added just one per chapter as long as that character makes a significant appearance within it. Even I know that it can sometimes become overkill, if they're added at every instance. Blackstar1 (talk) 22:39, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

Konohamaru's english girl on girl jutsu
That's just what he said in the english episode. Please change it back.

Coil of Fire
Wasn't it used specifically to make him say the word after they took a look at what the word was? If not, my mistake. --GoDai (talk) 02:25, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

Kisame knowledge about Naruto
What I have written in the Kisame's page was right: according to this page http://view.thespectrum.net/series/naruto-chapter-545.html the Madara's plan to use ifiltrated Zetsu to sow death and distrust among the ranks of the alliance was bound to bring out in the open battlefield Naruto anticipating the move of Shukaku (even if in the end wasn't necessary because Naruto had already taken such a decision even before the order). Madara already knew the skill of the kyuubi's jinchuuruki to feel the malice, but had the confirmation that Naruto had reached this ability only with the info from Kisame. --JK88 (talk) 15:44, July 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * RE: Ok, sorry for the misunderstanding and thanks for your attention :)--JK88 (talk) 10:17, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Orochimaru's epithet
has never been used to describe Orochimaru, as far as I'm aware. —ShounenSuki (talk 12:41, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Re:File names
I just named it randomly without thinking anything...! :P akz! (talk) 16:10, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Killer B and control
The other jinchuriki, although resurrected, don't have their tailed beasts anymore, therefore they can't have any kind of control over them. I am not assuming and I said B is the only living jinchuriki that does as we know Naruto doesn't. The Fox King(tylerbryant547@gmail.com (talk) 01:59, July 29, 2011 (UTC))

No, thats not what meant. Looking at the facts, Gaara, the first revived jinchuriki, could not use Shukaku's arms anymore after having him removed and it makes sense that if he could, he probably would have against Sasuke for a stronger weapon. The only thing he has shown is his sand control abilities. He hasn't been shown using Shukaku or any of the jutsu with his traits since he was removed, therefore it stands to reason that he can't. The other jinchuriki probably can't either. The Fox King(tylerbryant547@gmail.com (talk) 03:04, July 29, 2011 (UTC))

Re: Wall Post
"Uhm so because something is taken from you by death means you never had it? Danzō stated that he was one of the few people to have done so. Furthermore you don't know anything about the previous jinchūriki like Mito and Kushina and so forth. In any case I've reworded it, hopefully you're satisfied with the end result."" --- Why did you post it on my talk page?! akz! (talk) 02:26, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

okk ;) :P

Re: Aburame enquiry
Shino answers his own questions? I never noticed that… He uses a lot, though, which could be read as 'if you wonder why, it's because…'. It's still not really answering his own questions. He's just being pedantic about explaining himself. Scanning through his manga scenes, I cannot find any place where he answers his own questions.

I cannot find anything strange about the way Shibi, Muta, and Torune talk. —ShounenSuki (talk 13:05, July 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * You want examples? I'll give you examples ^^
 * From chapter 126, page 5:
 * Kankurō:
 * Shino:
 * From chapter 238, pages 6 and 7:
 * Shino:
 * Kiba:
 * Shino:
 * From chapter 394, page 16:
 * Kiba:
 * Shino:
 * From chapter 538, page 7:
 * Kiba:
 * Shino:
 * Kiba:
 * From chapter 538, page 13:
 * Kiba:
 * Shino:
 * Kiba:
 * —ShounenSuki (talk 16:28, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

Yagura edit
Actually we do know Yagura died that way because the Three- Tails was said to have been extracted from him. To extract a tailed beast from it jinchuriki will cause their death. The Fox King(tylerbryant547@gmail.com (talk) 14:09, July 29, 2011 (UTC))

First of all, Kushina's clan had great vitallity and that was the only reason she survivved the extraction process. Read about it on her article. All the other jinchuriki died after the extraction procees was done. Secondly, if you read the Three-Tails' article, it will say that it was extracted for unknown reasons. Therefore, whether Akatsuki extracted it or not, Yagura died when it was. That was hinted also by Chiyo when she said the two previous jinchuriki of the One-Tail died when they extracted it from them while she and team 7 were after Gaara.--

Noone really, I was just showing a little confidence is all. I just recently found out that what it says on the Three Tails' article was just a guess made at the time Yagura was introduced. However, whether or not that was the case of Yagura's death, it is still not known that he died in another way. We also know all other jinchuriki beside Kushina did die from rhe process, so Yagura's death could have been either way. I will reedit Yagura's page as a possibility rather than a fact since it is not known until we do know for sure. The Fox King(tylerbryant547@gmail.com (talk) 17:18, July 29, 2011 (UTC))

I did not assume on that last Yagura edit, I simply put as a possibility and it is a possibility. The Fox King(tylerbryant547@gmail.com (talk) 17:30, July 29, 2011 (UTC))

Understood then. I'll leave the page be until we know for as facts.--