Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-5407586-20141206094948/@comment-25227224-20141207035322

I the change to the official names because as an encyclopedia, we must conform to what is factual, based on empirical consensus of the author. The fallible position of argumentum ad antiquitatem; used to defend the customs & traditions is a counter-productive process.

I understand that changing multifarious amount of pages is a undertaking task. But we have to follow the information that we have now. The position of "Well no one complained before" is a very mute point. Taking into consideration that the community has changed since then. Whether it be in growth and the available information we have now. As everyone should know those names were just placeholders. Now that we have this information. We should correct it.

If not, we should at least do a vote so we can speed the process. Instead of talking in a circle.