User talk:Zetsu-senpai

Hello Zetsu-senpai, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Infobox:Danzō Shimura page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Jacce (Talk) 11:55, June 16, 2010

Edits
Inserting false info can get you blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:57, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

I told you. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:48, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Rasengan nature type
No, the original Rasengan is pure shape manipulation. However, Naruo manged to add his wind nature to it, thus creating the Wind Release: Rasengan. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 09:53, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Jiraiya's infobox
I didn't notice anything wrong. What was it you noticed. Also, please sign your comments with ~. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 14:53, June 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re: sealing technique:illusionary dragon nine consuming seal
From what I know, it was right from the beginning, (some Japanese words are written as one word in some cases), but if you want to be sure you should ask User:ShounenSuki. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 08:20, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re: hanzo's pitcure
Normally we uses anime pictures, unless there is colored manga pictures available. However, in Hanzo's case the anime makers made a mistake with his eyes, thus making them different in the anime compeered to the manga. And since the manga is the most accurate version of Naruto (since it has been done by Masashi Kishimoto himself) we use a manga picture for Hanzo's infobox and a small anime picture in the trivia section, pointing out the mistake. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 16:13, November 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Mifune
If you know it was me who undid that edit, then you should have read the edit summary as well. S im A nt 22:35, February 2, 2011 (UTC)