User talk:Sarutobii2

Hiya
Congrats, if you haven't seen, you're a new sysop as a result of this thread.

I do have a block request. Quakingstar. He's been flaming in the forums for far too long. The last warning I gave him was #4, which there's not even a proper template for because usually the third is the last. And that's only official warnings, he's been unofficially warned several times too.

But yeah, congrats. Needle and I nominated you if it was decided that there would be new sysops, and then Dantman just made you and Needle sysops. You deserve it! ^-^ AsianReaper (talk) 04:02, July 11, 2016 (UTC)


 * As @Reaper commented, congrats. Aside from QualingStar, Dizmiz01 has also been breaking the rules, trolling in the threads, and created two threads about a character he bashes on just to intentionally cause problems. I gave him warnings in the thread and on his page. It is clear he needs to take a timeout. --Rai 水 (talk) 05:29, July 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * Well that was a surprise lmao, thanks :) As for the 2 disruptive users, i blocked them in accordance with the blocking policy. Feel free to make requests anytime. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 12:02, July 11, 2016 (UTC)

Chat Request?
Let me know whenever you're available to chat. There's nothing serious/urgent, but I just wanna discuss our promotion to Sysop and shoot the shit on some things. --Jizo 悟 (talk) 17:34, July 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * The site was acting up and I couldn't sign in, apologies on my part. I'm available now if you are.--Jizo 悟 (talk) 19:51, July 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry man, I was at work. This different time zone shit has me nettled. --Jizo 悟 (talk) 22:17, July 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * Guuuuuurl you know we all gotta be in this together.--Jizo 悟 (talk) 19:45, July 25, 2016 (UTC)

Concern
I am concerned that Sirspamsalot24 is a sock puppet account for Dizmiz01 who you blocked yesterday. I mean not only does the user agree to the same things as Dizmiz, he posts on the same threads he did, the first of which was the very thread we had our disagreement. The new user also created a Tsunade thread (what are the odds?), which Dizmiz was known for doing to make Tsunade look bad, though in the new thread, the Tsunade vs Konan thread, he states he believes Tsunade would win, though this could be to deceive us. I feel the user should be blocked, and you could leave a message on their talk page and ask them to respond, or to dig deeper, ask the user what they think of Tsunade? Like is she strong? Does she really deserve to be labelled a kage? I would ask but if it's the same user, then they'll probably lie. --Rai 水 (talk) 22:38, July 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * Well since you didn't seem to care when I told you about Sirspamsalot24 being a sock puppet of Dizmiz01 with what I told you, how about looking at this. This should be the icing on the cake now for you to block him for sockpuppeting. As I told you like Dizmiz he holds a grudge towards Tsunade and in all caps writes how horrible she is. --Rai 水 (talk) 05:42, July 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Dude are you blind or something? About an hour after you blocked Dizmiz, this new user popped up, posting on the same threads with the same views, creating a Tsunade thread just like Dimiz did, and holds a strong disdain for Tsunade like Dizmiz, as evidenced by his post I linked to you. --Rai 水 (talk) 16:03, July 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * And the user I just told you about just admitted to being Dizmiz01. I said he was Dimiz01 and the guy brought up him not being blocked anymore, when I said nothing about it. If you can't see that the account it a sock puppet then maybe you being a sysop was a mistake. --Rai 水 (talk) 18:39, July 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * As I just brought up in the thread, the user account you are talking about is not blocked any longer, neither do I see anything that suggest he is admitting to anything, other than stating a blatant fact.
 * If you actually bothered to look at Dizmiz01's profile page, there is no block notice there (a user with no userpage on the wiki displays the block notice that is always present on Special:Contributions), nor is the "BLOCKED" tag present in the masthead, ergo the user account isn't blocked. You don't have to be a moderator to work that out.
 * Any reasonable person could consider your comments to be harassment and deliberately intended to instigate negative reactions. Additionally, Saru will not go to Wikia, nor will Wikia give up CheckUser results to him for such a simple thing: they would just ask Saru to make his own judgement call. CheckUser is only asked for in cases of extreme vandalism/disruptive behaviour, not just checking to see whether you think someone is socking a block to post in some threads with opinions you think are just similar to another.
 * If you really think the user you mentioned is a sockpuppet, then make a request on the sysop requests page and present your evidence to them and they can pass their own judgement.
 * Would you start accusing me of being a sockpuppet if I started parrotting similar opinions in the forums? --Sajuuk 18:45, July 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh really. You are the very one that told me to go to Saru and ask to block the user from what I told you. I don't do well with people being fake. And fine, the user I claimed him to be checked once to find who he is and sees e found he was blocked. But checks the account again to see he wasn't blocked. I have been watching the new user like a hawk. The user has the same exact views as Dizmiz01 and speaks like him. What don't you get? But believe it is just a coincidence. --Rai 水 (talk) 18:58, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

Interview
What's wrong with it? • Seelentau 愛 議 20:20, July 17, 2016 (UTC)
 * eeeh...
 * Mari Morimoto (translator): So I brought up the fact that in the Seventh Hokage and the Scarlet Spring sequel story, there's that one line when Naruto complains about how Sasuke's so analog, and Shikamaru's says, "Oh, but he goes to areas where you can't charge anything."


 * I asked Kishimoto-sensei about that and he said, 'Well, you know, I wanted to show that time had passed. So some things may have developed in the intervening time between the last chapter of Naruto and fifteen years later when the Seventh Hokage story happens. Also, there's the fact that the story is set during a time of peace, so there's now more money available, because the funds that were being pushed into the war can now be used for things like developing technology.
 * • Seelentau 愛 議 20:38, July 17, 2016 (UTC)

Forum image
A user uploaded an image for use in the forums, and I can't delete it. Could you?

http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/File:Femalekanna.png AsianReaper (talk) 00:45, July 19, 2016 (UTC)

re: ???
(Aya, two weeks off really did good things for me...) The best case scenario would be 1200 chapters to me, honestly. Excited as hell for the Sanji retrieval arc, and the battle with Big Mom. Crazy stuff indeed. Got Pirate Warriors 3 some weeks ago, and I've been TRYING to get Burning Blood just so I can mess with Gear Fourth Luffy. EDIT: btw, saw that Star Wars trailer long before you did :D :D :D 03:47, July 20, 2016 (UTC)

Revert War
Hello Sarutobii2, I fear there might be a reverted war on the Indra Ōtsutsuki.png so can you help me get this over with?-- 4th Six Paths (talk) 23:06, July 24, 2016 (UTC)

Re: PKM
I love Pokémon. Unfortunately, I have not played Pokémon Go yet, but I plan to. It looks fun. Have you played it? --Rai 水 (talk) 15:43, July 25, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Manga Only
They were provided in the manga. Unless there's something I'm missing, this is much like getting stuff from databooks. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 04:00, August 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * Consider the following. For example, we know of two of Boruto's nature transformation jutsu, his Wind Release and his Lightning Release. His LR is a jutsu that was introduced in a novel. Just adding Boruto as a user in that article without changing anything else makes the article read as if the jutsu still exists only within the novels, which would mean Boruto used it as well, in a novel. To fix that, it necessitated the jutsu to be marked as appearing in the manga as well, and marking Boruto as a manga-only user. His WR appeared in manga and anime. Just adding Boruto to the article without the manga-only tag would also make the article read as if Boruto had used the jutsu both in the manga and anime, which isn't the case, as his only appearance in anime, the OVA, involves no jutsu use on his part at all. A better example is Mitsuki and the Snake Clone Technique. Other than a mention in his profile, the jutsu only exists in the anime, and Mitsuki, unlike Boruto, has not appeared in anime, only the canon movie, novel and manga. There has to be an intersection between the media the character used a certain jutsu, and the media those characters exist in. Kaguya and Shisui on the other hand, those intersections exist for those characters. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:28, August 8, 2016 (UTC)

Madara Susanoo image
Appreciate the hi-def image you uploaded for Madara's Susanoo ribcage, but there's a random character in the background. Could you crop that out or nah? 04:45, August 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah.. ok. 04:58, August 8, 2016 (UTC)

Ay
Yo. Possible we could chat? If not, can we do so one of these days after you're off the holidays? Wanna catch up on some things if you're alright with it. 04:00, August 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yessir. 15:24, August 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Can we chat later tonight? 22:27, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, it's cool. We'll just keep trying! lol 03:32, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

RE: Family Members
You could try and change it to Uchiha in Sarada's infobox (The preview would probably be wrong in this case).--~Ultimate Supreme  09:02, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

No--~Ultimate Supreme  21:08, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Blogs
Hi there. How does one go about creating blogs on this wiki? ღ••ThunderSnidget••ღ 20:28, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * I got this one. --Sajuuk 20:29, August 23, 2016 (UTC)

Hey man, uploaded an updated version of Kakashi's Anime Susanoo screenshot. It's basically the manga panel and i think it looks better, just saiyan. --ShenLong Kazama (talk) 17:15, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

Hmm
These users' names and deleted user contributions are pretty much the same. Block one for sock-puppetry or nah? 13:58, August 29, 2016 (UTC)