User talk:BerserkerPhantom

Welcome
Hello, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Hypothetical Battle: Nagato vs Itachi page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.


 * Here are several other pages that can help you with where to begin-


 * Wiki Activity – A great first stop, because you can see what pages other people have been editing, and where you can help out.


 * Help Pages - If you're new to editing or having trouble getting something to work, the help pages are a great place to start.


 * Forums - The forums are used for a number of things, from proposing policy changes to general wiki discussions. Please use Naruto Answers for asking general questions.


 * Administrators - A list of 's administrators. If you need additional assistance or are having troubles, feel free to contact an administrator with the details.


 * Special:Upload - A page that provides you a form for uploading images easily.

Always sign in before you edit – This is so that we can recognize you!

Always sign your posts - When leaving a message on someone's talk page, remember to sign it by clicking either the 'signature' button or by typing four tildes ( ). This is so the person knows who to reply to.

There's a lot to do around here, so we hope you'll stay with us and make many more contributions. And again, welcome to. Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Omnibender (talk) 17:36, March 26, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Yello
Yo. The thing is that if said edit doesn't add anything to article, than it IS unnecessary. Simple as that. --JouXIII (talk) 14:16, March 27, 2016 (UTC)

RE:The Program
Don't sweat it. I've been busy myself.Cloudtheavenger (talk) 06:21, March 28, 2016 (UTC)

Some advice <...>
well, does this mean one of us have to remove the literal meaning on the infobox that doesn't shown entirely? Kunoichi101 (talk) 21:19, April 30, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Storm 4 Q&A
There have been very few sources for Storm 4 combo names. There are a few, one of them is Kurama Arm Attack, but you'd have to check how it is in the game, and then compare to what he did in the game. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:28, April 30, 2016 (UTC)

flash-forward
Ackchyually, the opening scene is the current time and the young Boruto stuff is a flashback. • Seelentau 愛 議 18:22, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, technically, we should display Boruto's looks from the intro and not from the flashback... • Seelentau 愛 議 20:14, May 4, 2016 (UTC)

Re: TCG?
It's the least reliable official source, but it's an official source, yes. It goes like this: Manga > databook > canon movie > anime > anime filler, movies & video games > TCG. Basically, I would really only use TCG names if there's nothing else available but the technique is distinctive enough to warrant its own article. I did that for Coercion Sharingan, for example. • Seelentau 愛 議 16:14, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Since the databooks give him no rank, that information is obviously wrong.
 * The question is, where do we stop? We have no set rules as to when a technique warrants its own article and when not. Technically, all of Sai's techniques could simply link to the Choju Giga article. We give them each their own article so that the "mother" article isn't overflowing with information, to make the information more accessible and attractive to the visitors. If, however, a new article only consists of one sentence and no additional information like rank or Kanji or so, there's no need for it.
 * So basically, the more unique information there is, the more viable is a unique article. • Seelentau 愛 議 16:28, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Technically, there are no real rules as to when a technique gets its own article and when it doesn't, as I said. And I'm really not sure a TCG name is enough to warrant an article... but you'll be met with heavy opposition if you merge them^^ • Seelentau 愛 議 21:11, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would be a valid argument. But nevertheless, we really need a consensus for when an article is viable and when it's better left in its mother article. • Seelentau 愛 議 21:16, May 6, 2016 (UTC)

Edit Warring
Stop acting like a new user and discuss the matter on the talk page before acting. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 17:06, May 6, 2016 (UTC)

Deletion tags
The pages you marked for deletion were named via Naruto Collectible Card Game. --Rai 水 (talk) 18:02, May 6, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Chapter References
"I suggest you go elsewhere, like...you know: How you said you'd leave, left an entire sh@tstorm on the forums then played it off like nothing had happened..."

Yes. --Jizo 悟 (talk) 02:13, May 8, 2016 (UTC)

Forum Warning #1
BerserkerPhantom, personal attacks will not be tolerated. That warning would have come directly from me if Sarutobii2 hadn't already done it. Please re-read the forum and talkpage policies and refrain from personally insulting other users within discussions.


 * Personal attacks are explicitly prohibited in the forum policy: "Do not troll or flame other users. If your message is intended to instigate a reaction from the opposing user or is clearly intended to insult someone else, it will be removed and may result in an immediate revocation of your right to post in the forums or edit the wiki."
 * We even have a note on moderators: "Respect the decisions of forum moderators and sysops. Responding with sarcasm or ridicule if they tell you to not do something may lead to you receiving warnings or having your ability to use the forums or wiki revoked. | If you have a problem with a forum moderator or sysop's decision, politely discuss it with them and get other forum moderators and sysops involved if necessary."
 * Warnings given by moderators are **not** spam by any definition. Only real spam (bot spam, etc...) and overt harassment is allowed to be removed from talkpages. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 14:25, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Sarutobii2 has falsely accused me of doing so, tho. If you backtracked the thread and checked out the comment, you'd know. Telling someone that they weren't able to read the message even when it was repeated 5 times in the actual thread is not in any way rude behaviour or a violation of the policies.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 14:27, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * "#ReadingIsHardForSaru" is a personal attack. You are not calling out an issue with communication, you are directly insinuating that another person on the wiki has reading difficulties, using that as an insult rather than trying to assist communication with them, and formatting it as a hashtag to further increase its weight as an insult. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 14:34, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * That is completely wrong and biased. I pointed out that he didn't bother reading the messages and kept calling me a liar, despite me pointing out exactly what needed to be pointed out ~5 times, and he chose to ignore it and blatantly state what was not the case, hence "it's clearly difficult for him to read the messages accordingly". Hashtags don't work on the wiki regardless.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 14:38, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * He did not personally call you a "liar". He stated an opinion that you were "lying" in direct combination with references to what he believed to be falsehoods. You elevated this to a direct personal attack by tacking on an insult in a place it was completely unnecessary. The fact that this wiki has no hashtag functionality is not an excuse; you formatted in the way that is culturally known as a hashtag, in a place where it doesn't even have a functional purpose as one. This separates it from the actual sentence of conversation and makes the insult one tacked on at the end; where if you had been civil, you could have trivially chosen to omit. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 14:54, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * In no shape of form was that an opinion, and if it was - then this is even more of an opinion that his is(?). He repeated it twice as well, even after I cleared it up the first time, hence - clearly trying to force an argument. And, as I've said already, it's not a personal attack, it's a jab at the point that he completely ignored comments that prove his accusations as completely false and absent minded, per "it's clearly difficult for him to read the messages accordingly"... If anything, he showed complete disrespect towards a fellow user by ignoring words and blatantly complaining and accusing about stuff he should've not complained or accused about in the first place. As pointed out by a different user as a "round-in-circles discussion" - that's because Sarutobii2 refused to read the responses to questions he initiated, leading the thread completely nowhere and completely off-topic.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 14:59, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * Jabbing at another person that way is a personal attack. What you personally consider it as is irrelevant, it is a personal attack. And even if you had been personally attacked it does not permit you to respond with a personal attack; incivility is dealt with by contacting a mod or sysop, not by responding with incivility.
 * This point is closed, politely refrain from further personal attacks in the forums or you will not be permitted use of the wiki. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 15:13, May 8, 2016 (UTC)

Boruto
No speculation. Nowhere it was told that Byakugan, more it isn't active.--Sharingan91 (talk) 20:11, May 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Check 'ur talk page :p--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 20:12, May 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * I have read.--Sharingan91 (talk) 20:13, May 19, 2016 (UTC)

re:???
Sort of... I was testing something and was about to undo it, but you got ahead of me. --JouXIII (talk) 19:40, June 16, 2016 (UTC)

Talkpage Input 2
If you could add your input into this talkpage and this talkpage? I'll be much appreciated. Thank you. --Rai 水 (talk) 03:47, June 19, 2016 (UTC)

Takigakure novel
I have just been thinking about it recently since there seems to be no end to the @Paladin sock-puppets. Were you ever able to get your hands on that novel? If so, is there any merit held within @Paladins words? Munchvtec (talk) 06:51, June 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * Whichever is easier for you. If you really are willing to screencap the entire thing then that'd be awesome. I wouldn't post it here though. A link to wherever you put it is fine. Or a link in a thread or what not :/ Munchvtec (talk) 12:47, June 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * Whenever is fine. Thanks a ton! Munchvtec (talk) 16:18, June 30, 2016 (UTC)
 * I picked it up myself. Thanks anyway. Munchvtec (talk) 11:09, May 21, 2017 (UTC)

Reverting
Stop jumping at any chance to revert my edits. While you're at it, stop inserting false claims of an issue in summaries & using rational that for some reason applies to me but not yourself. Trolls who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 11:01, September 22, 2016 (UTC)

I don't really remember the sexy jutsu being referenced in the Boruto Movie's novel. But if Konohamaru did mention it, it was probably him using it.

The novel has been out for a few years so I think someone would of noticed it by now anyway. But regardless, how exactly do we remove it from the jutsu selection @ Boruto's profile? GodlyHades (talk) 10:52, April 26, 2017 (UTC)

Boruto Question
BerserkerPhantom are you going to upload a full body image of Hanabi Hyuga as an adult from the boruto series with a plain background like you did for Shikamaru? --Blondie77 (talk) 20:08, May 30, 2017 (UTC)

Premature edits
Could you please not edit things that are currently being discussed? Thanks! :) • Seelentau 愛 議 13:13, June 6, 2017 (UTC)
 * You presented it like it was factual (as in, I thought that it was from the 4thDB), so I figured it was legit. Sorry, it appears I was mistaken :p.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 13:16, June 6, 2017 (UTC)
 * Doesn't matter what I do, as long as the discussion is still ongoing.^^ • Seelentau 愛 議 13:19, June 6, 2017 (UTC)

Byakugan edits
Hello. Please understand that I am not interested in an editing war. Keep in mind that there are many anime-only abilities listed on the actual abilities section such as infra-red, mind-reading, and so on. I agree that determining nature affinity is a non-canon movie effect and will concede that should remain in the trivia section, but determining chakra development in general is a canon anime ability.--Steveo920 (talk) 12:48, June 8, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Listin' Ougis
As much as I'd like adding information about every named video game jutsu and combo I can find and translate, I just don't quite see it going forward. There was a time I tried putting forward an idea for separate lists for game stuff, though in a per character basis, and the interest even in the discussion was minuscule. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 23:11, June 13, 2017 (UTC)

Eight Gates
Where is the talk page that you're speaking of? It doesn't make sense and I wanna see for myself whose idea it was. ExyleCage (talk) 13:56, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

Nevermind. I found it. ExyleCage (talk) 14:04, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

RE: Search by property changes
Everything should be working now that is if wikia doesn't screw things up again... Null edit should fix the pages that might be cached.--~Ultimate Supreme  17:42, July 1, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Chakra Flow
It seemed I was confusing chakra flow with chakra control, but I was not even the one who put that in the first place, so for you to try and say I'm making up things as I'm going along is quite unnecessary. --Rai 水 (talk) 08:53, July 31, 2017 (UTC)
 * I just sat here and said I confused the two, but your comment was unnecessary because I'm not just making things up as I go along so yes you are being an asshole, and if that's the route you want to go, then let me know cuz I have no problem being one too. --Rai 水 (talk) 08:58, July 31, 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes but when have you've known me to make stuff up as I go along? If anything you could have said inserting false information or misconstruing things. But, I owned up to it and stopped and even told you that I made a mistake but you carried on to be an asshole about it as if I did something to you personally. You say you've reverted things in the past and made a mistake but tries to come for me. I just don't get it. --Rai 水 (talk) 09:41, July 31, 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not mad that you corrected me, it was you trying to act as if I'm some kind of troll or something. It was your poor choice of words. I don't need to think anything through. You know where I stand, and as long as you can respect me, we are good. --Rai 水 (talk) 09:51, July 31, 2017 (UTC)

RE: chem
I'm not denying it's an OVA. I pointed out that The Day Naruto Became Hokage (OVA) is part of the Naruto series, not Boruto OVA #1. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 02:53, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
 * The OVA was released with Naruto merchandise and came out before the Boruto anime was announced, making it in no way a Boruto OVA. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 10:25, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
 * The wiki doesn't work like that. If it did, Chapter 700 would be classified as a Boruto chapter. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 10:38, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
 * It's time like this that i remember the last words Cloudtheavenger said to you - "It's just arguing back and forth. The nobody else will like you should be my line. You're the only person I've ever had a heat with here. You on the other hand, I count at least three, including myself and TTF. Get over yourself buddy. Have a nice day. I also know you like to have the last word, so go for it, I won't reply to it." --Sarutobii2 (talk) 11:08, August 10, 2017 (UTC)

Well excuse me for trying to prevent a revert war and trying to nicely correct your misconception. What a devil am I...--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 11:28, August 10, 2017 (UTC)


 * Just like how other wikis operate and previously how Snapper ran the place, discussions aren't required when it's clear as day an image or article isn't needed. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 22:17, August 18, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Flying Swallow
Oh it looks like I missed that scene. --Rai 水 (talk) 17:25, August 14, 2017 (UTC)

Apology
I never got a chance to apologize for the trouble I caused you back when we were arguing over the Eight Gates thing, so I wanted to let you know I'm sorry. I should've been paying attention to previous threads made by other people before making unwarranted edits and then getting angry over something so stupid. I actually went through the same thing today, and that's actually what reminded me of that whole ordeal. So I just wanted to make amends with you. ExyleCage (talk) 03:10, October 6, 2017 (UTC)

Hand Signs
Look, I am not trying to start an edit war or question your own views, but clearly if handsigns are used for a technique, they can used by the person independently of any tools.--Steveo920 (talk) 13:12, October 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, but the Sharingan cannot copy techniques without being physically built for it. Ergo, Sarada couldn't copy the technique if it was a Kiba-exclusive technique.--Steveo920 (talk) 13:16, October 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * Kakashi said it himself.--Steveo920 (talk) 13:19, October 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * In Raiga's final technique to bury himself, he performed his Lightning Burial without hand signs.--Steveo920 (talk) 13:23, October 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * Flying Revolving Sword, and Fang Passing Fang are physical skills that halve nothing to do with kekkei genkais or body altering like the Aburama clan's hive body. Kakashi showed himself strong enough to wield Zabuza's blade in prolonged battle. Fang Passing Fang is a hiden technique but not necessarily physical attribute exclusive to the Inuzuka Clan.--Steveo920 (talk) 13:33, October 25, 2017 (UTC)