Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-1251315-20141013163005/@comment-25155476-20141017023401

SuperSajuuk wrote: Blaezej wrote: I thin that what's happening here is that people are forgetting to be unbiased in their opinions and that once they decide they want someone else as a Sysop (Seelentau), they come here and say that Sajuuk isn't "quite ready yet".

Honestly, you're defending points that others make instead of taking constructive criticism. Even as me not being part of this wiki, I heavily believe that you should let the election run its course. Why not focus on why he isn't ready and how you came to this conclusion, instead of supporting one and giving no other reasons as to why he shouldn't be made Sysop yet. This is something people need to keep in mind and I've seen quite a few opposers in this thread doing exactly this or are basing their vote based on just what "other people" have said and singular interactions, which don't prove anything.

You all need to make unbiased votes, instead of just voting based on what other people are claiming, because everyone has different interactions with users: those people who've opposed are due to "past" events or due to "previous communications", which aren't exactly being "unbiased" in any way...

At least Dantman will have some sense not to read biased votes or posts with little reasoning or rationale behind them. :/