Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-38812954-20190831032416/@comment-9782468-20190919142540

You claim he won't have time. You have nothing to go off of. Naruto is a sensor of the highest degree, and Sasuke needs to actually build his chakra to make any attack like that work. And Naruto would sense and react accordingly.

It burned him because he let it, so it's not really a feat. If Danzo was jogging, you realize he's not moving at the full speed of Ninja right? That means Amaterasu still burns slow compared to Shinobi.

It didn't burn very fast at all. Nagato was mindless and crippled, yet the flames didn't actually burn him all the way through. Pretty slow tbh.

No, your experience has no weight in a debate, facts do. Empathy has no reason to be here either.

For example, it could be my experience that I never got the flu even with no shot. That doesn't mean shots are ineffective or that they're placebo. To actually have certainty in something, you need a repeatable experiment.

Empathy is the ability to understand someone else's feelings. Your feelings don't hold weight in a debate.

Factual thinkers are short sighted? Lol alright, if you say so.

And now I'm selfish too. Hm, it seems like this paragraph was made to insult me, but it's okay. I'm not so emotional that it'll hurt me.

Facts are not surface level, so they're not superficial. Facts just are. Facts are what's true, whether it be a deep truth or a shallow truth. Imagination is very important; I'm an artist and it's very valuable. But your original point of the discussion, attempting to call out a plot hole, is not something rooted in just imagination. It's you thinking that something else should have happened there based on the series. So of course, when the facts are against you, people will tell you.

Factual thinkers lack depth and understanding? That's like saying a doctor lacks depth and understanding in the medical field because they only have think of the facts.

Empathy doesn't mean "deep thinker" or "less opinionated." You realize empathy is actually more base in opinion? It's right-brained, it's subjective. Subjectivity, opinion, and empathy all fall under the same right-brained style of thinking. That's not to say the right-brain isn't important or less important than any others; I actually use more of my right brain than left (based on tests I had to do for class and job interviews). But opinions will always hold less value than facts in a debate.

I'm superficial in terms of Amaterasu? Bold claim. But you're giving it abilities (Sasuke, rather) that it doesn't have. Seems kinda surface-level to me.

You claim Naruto won't have time to buff his defense but again, you have nothing to go off of. No evidence that the best sensor in the world won't notice Sasuke is coalescing the majority of his chakra into a massive technique.

Even if Sasuke used all his chakra to try to burn through Naruto's, Naruto would be the one with chakra left to spare.

My only evidence?

Madara and his armour.

Samurai and their armour.

Obito with Kamui.

Cripple Nagato with Deva Path.

Sasuke with his substitution.

Naruto with his V1 cloak.

Ten Tails with its shedding ability (this one being empowered with a very high calibre Wind Release).

"Only evidence" indeed.

How sure are you that Sasuke can summon the Gedo satue? Currently the Gedo statue is in an alternate dimension sealed up with Kaguya. Even transferring the Kage through to one of Kaguya's dimensions is taxing for Sasuke. How certain are you that he can summon such a massive force through dimensions?