Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-5407586-20141206094948/@comment-25227224-20141207182631

So how will this be resolved? Should we change it or not? The arguments made against the idea; are subjective statements of preferences.

It's typically based on empirical consensus of the author. Not the viewers. If it was wrong, we change it. These arc names were placeholders. If not, we should at least do a vote so we can speed the process. Instead of talking in a circle. If people read it earlier maybe this would've been a mute issue.

@Sajuuk : We never named a single article named after whatever the databooks stated in the past? Didn't we name a bunch of new pages based on the Databook?

To avoid the demagoguery, we must conform to what is factual, not pick and choose - just because it doesn't fit the narrative or our subjective thoughts on it. I don't like the names at all. It doesn't mean that I have to like it. The statement is absurd. To no offense, nor personal attack that you might assume.