Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20150609103822/@comment-1251315-20150609192535

KirinNOTKarin98 wrote: It's all about respect. Though it's not like many people care about that here. There are only a handful of users who are pleasant, and even few who can be considered kind. So you think that a user who stayed around to make 4 edits after they created the wiki, then left it after having made zero contributions in the way of templates, policies or actually making pages, is being disrespectful? Yeah no. TranClan doesn't give a damn for this wiki, that was evident many years ago and this CT is simply to make something happen that should have long since happened.

Pretty much. He's one of the founders, regardless of how little time he has actually spent on the wiki. He deserves the recognition. Founder means absolutely nothing, it's just a tag Wikia made to denote the person who used the CreateWiki form. And him losing user rights does not remove the Founder tag. Frankly, the mere fact he did nothing for this wiki, other than "create it" and that Dantman has done far more to bring the wiki to where it is today, makes me want to call Dantman the founder and not TranClan. Creating a wiki and then doing nothing with it does not make you a founder. Clearly common sense is out of the window if people believe such things.

I find it very hilarious how all the oppose reasons in this thread are along the lines of "this is ridiculous", "I don't like sajuuk" or "this is out of hand". I hope none of these are taken seriously or even considered.