Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-36006024-20180926134241/@comment-26636534-20181025163526

BlazeRelease wrote:

And it's interesting that you're actually being immature here and falsely calling me on it. I've stated every point you guys brought, it is you all that are avoiding it for obvious reasons. So here's what I'll say for you, I accept your concession. You are using simple nos and insults instead of actually trying counter my points. And have so far failed entirely in this debate and is using immature acts in desperate hopes of 'debating', no offence. But this isn't how you should be in a debate. Atleast try to give a counter, I regard @Combat for doing so atleast, even how long the post would be.

Lol, I call you out on being immature, and low and behold you say I'm immature. Congratulations, you played yourself.

You argument on Bee having "killing intent" fails because Bee tried to leave the fight before Sasuke used Amaterasu. Taka actually had some info on Bee, they knew he was a jinchuriki and they knew he was from kumo. That's at least some intel, I'm not sure Bee even knew about the sharingan. So your "lack of intel" argument also fails.

Finally your, "tentacle substitution" argument fails, because Bee can perform it by himself, when you stated he could not.

Now, in your last post you are confusing things that @Combat stated, from what I have stated. Stop doing that to try and seem like you have any semblance of an argument. I have address your points to me in full, yet you say I didn't "counter" them. It's funny because my "counters" are actually manga feats, where yours are " If Taka knew this then this would happen", in other words speculation and assumptions.

Feats > assumptions.

Note: I could pick holes in your previous post(s), since there are many, but I think it would be better to reduce this "debate" back to these three root issues. If these can be resolved then there would be no reason to go on tangents and exaggerations, as this is way off topic. If you can state your points clearly, short and without any of these false accusations, then I would gladly take you seriously.

Let's not continue in this fashion, since I could not understand you from the first post of yours that I responded to.