Talk:Lava Release: Flaming Bullets

ugh
This strikes me as a "we don't need unnamed articles to represent nature types" kind of thing. ~SnapperTo 22:16, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * Though I do see where you come from and am sad with the amount of unnamed techniques, I've asked a few people who were in the chat about this and all agreed that, albeit unnamed, they're specific enough to be created. We can always go to the forums and ask a wider community about this though--Omojuze (talk) 22:18, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * It's just that it has the same issue that most unnamed techniques have where it is no more informative than Etoro Konjiki. ~SnapperTo 22:29, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * I can always shorten the section. Anyways, I'm bias on this. Yes, it's really frustrating to deal with this many unnamed techniques, especially with us not having a visual, but with the novel being specific as such, I really hit the wall.--Omojuze (talk) 22:33, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * The other article(s) being too informative isn't the problem. It's that this article doesn't expand on the topic at all. If a link to an article says as much as the article itself, the article's existence should be reconsidered, I think. ~SnapperTo 22:49, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * Weell... There is this, which is basically the same as this technique, but using sand instead of lava. The only difference is that the sand one was named, this one wasn't.--Omojuze (talk) 22:54, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * Right, and that has a hodgepodge of name info and possibly some other bologna courtesy of the databook. Its additional info is slight, but it's there. This one, again, has no additional info that links to it will not have already given. ~SnapperTo 23:10, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, there's also this. >.> Dunno, If you want it deleted, very well, I'm completely fine either way.--Omojuze (talk) 11:02, June 25, 2015 (UTC)

I disagree with removing it, theres many many unnamed techniques but I dont see those being removed. The only difference is those have pictures and this doesnt. But thats not enough to say this jutsu should be removed when those arent.KuroiToketsuHoshi (talk) 15:21, July 21, 2015 (UTC)