Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-5407586-20141206094948/@comment-17623-20141209120425

Basically what this comes down to are two things. And yes this will sound biased.

Follow what Kishimoto put in the Databook just because it is in the databook with no questions or concerned asks and goddamn the organizational mess it will cause.

or

Follow what we have been doing, ignoring what Kishimoto put in the databook because it is felt ignoring the Databook would be more beneficial to the wikia as a whole.

So let me ask you this Ten Tailed Fox, as you seem to be more concerned with us stamping on Kishimoto than the organization of the wikia (Which is quite frankly my only concern. Kishimoto don't write us no checks.). You say this makes us seem arrogant, and good. Let us seem arrogant. Our goal was never to be the "Online Databook", it was to be a fan made encyclopedia for information. We present the information as we have it, in a way that makes it functional for us.

If Kishimoto decides he wants the Itachi Pursuit Mission to be three separate story events, then fan-diddly-tastic. However, if we, as people who again are not 1) getting paid by Kishimoto, and 2) fan editors of a fan wiki in no way offiically associated with Kishimoto, Shueisha, Viz, or Studio Pierrot find that the Itachi Pursuit Mission, in terms of organization functions better when it literally starts and ends with Itachi then it is within our right to present it as such.

If "not paying Kishimoto his dues" are the issue, then we can do what we've always done and note the discrepancy in the opening paragraphs as we have been doing. But I'll be goddamned if we are just going say "Fuck organization, Kishimoto's way or the highway!"