User talk:Simant

Re: Team Infobox
If you can do it in a way that doesn't cause existing queries to become a complex mess (or at least not any messier). Otherwise it's better to use another property. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Feb 12, 2010 @ 08:05 (UTC)


 * I was wondering, is it possible to somehow make a distinction between ad hoc, single-mission teams like the Sasuke Retrieval Team and more established teams like the genin teams? --ShounenSuki (talk 17:40, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I was thinking of a separate property row called team type, or something. --ShounenSuki (talk 18:18, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's a bit of a problem, actually. the team status property shouldn't be there. It's the same as using current or former, which we've been trying to get rid off as well. --ShounenSuki (talk 21:59, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * It might be a bit superfluous in terms of information, but I would personally like to be able to sort the teams on team type. --ShounenSuki (talk 22:13, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I haven't really thought about the exact terms yet. It will really depend on what exactly is considered a team, as opposed to a partnership or an organisation.
 * I could see values for genin team (e.g. Team Kakashi) and ad hoc teams (e.g. the Sasuke Retrieval Team), perhaps criminal gangs (e.g. the Magaki group) and specialised teams (e.g. Twelve Guardian Ninja and the various teams of the Nijū Shōtai). --ShounenSuki (talk 22:20, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

2 Things

 * 1) Might want to think about another archive. This is starting to get long.
 * 2) Color for the infoboxes. /shrug think they are stable enough to handle it? I dunno they are all grey and it seems kinda boring >.>. Like Green for Konoha, Beige for Suna, Purple for Oto, ect, ect.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 17:40, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I would say they people like him would have the color of their most recent affiliation. For example, Orochimaru would be purple, for Sound, while Sasuke would be...well...I think he would be gray for straight missing-nin...All members of Akatsuki would have Red...ect...ect...--TheUltimate3 (talk) 01:56, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I think it would be more logical to use their main affiliation; the village of which they have the symbol in their databook profile. Otogakure for Orochimaru, Konohagakure for Madara and Sasuke, Kirigakure for Suigetsu, etcetera. --ShounenSuki (talk 13:46, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * That make sense...But for some reason seeing Sasuke's affiliation be green for Konoha just seems...stupid. For some reason I have less of an issue with Madara's (though I still would like some sort of red or red/black for Akatsuki) being green...--TheUltimate3 (talk) 14:07, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * Affiliation is really that village that a character is most put into connection with. Sasuke is still thought off as a Konoha-nin, just like Madara is. I wouldn't find it odd at all to see him with a Konoha infobox. --ShounenSuki (talk 18:24, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * @Simant Understood. Don't worry about it if it's a problem. I'll figure something out once everything is stable and what not.
 * @ShounenSuki: It's more or less my strong anti-Sasuke sentiment. The fact that I can see the series true villain with the Konoha symbol, but not Sasuke is really because I see him as an asshat. >.>--TheUltimate3 (talk) 18:35, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Kanji Question
The Japanese equivalent of the comma is 、. If the normal commas don't work well and you dislike the Japanese commas, you could always just use a semicolon instead. --ShounenSuki (talk 13:53, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Possible bug
Not sure if this is a bug in the jutsu infobox or in the character infobox, but in Han's infobox, his only technique (Steam-based Ninjutsu) is listed three times. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:06, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps a problem at Steam-based Ninjutsu? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:40, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Rinnegan
Honestly the guys an idiot. Been gone so long I'm acting childish. *sigh*  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 03:06, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah I saw that but I didn't want to get rid of eerything so I had to do it the hard way.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 04:07, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Please stop making me feel bad about things I miss. Last time I tried to archive my talk page I blanked it and had to rollback everything. This was all back before that easy button. D: I waas putting it off until today hoping to get it right; which I did :D  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 04:12, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I know. Me and you still good right?  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 04:18, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Protect
Fixed. Jacce | Talk 06:30, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Episode - video links
Screw Crunchyroll >.> (Horribly biased. Used to be a user of Crunchyroll before they dumped all the anime and made ya have to pay.) All the episodes (official translations mind you) should be on Hulu. Though that may also cause problems (I think Dantman said something about it being regional or something) but I do know its free.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 19:30, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Delete
I tried. Jacce | Talk 05:46, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Stats infobox
Is it ok to protect the new infoboxes or is there something you want to fix on them? Jacce | Talk 19:51, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Protected. Jacce | Talk 06:52, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

just so ya know.
you edited my post, but just so ya know.... IT WASNT ME!!! i only edited the lower part, i think supersaiyaman did the part you fixed.--Shelldone (talk) 22:56, March 3, 2010 (UTC) sorry, upon further inspection. actually its not supersaiyaman.Shelldone (talk) 23:34, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me......
1. This is a Wikipedia page - hardly creditable or highly recognised. 2. What AN extremely... - If you’re going to offend and criticise a WIKIPEDIA contribution, do so with correct grammar. The irony there is unbearable. 3. "The fate of the two is currently unknown" - A simplistic sentence, yes, that illustrates how far the storyline has been extended. The initial cliff hanger and the last scene in which the reader is left with.

I don't care much for your tone in your description, finding you unbearably rude and ignorant. I repeat. If you’re going to insult someone, do it in the right manner - and subtly. Sanders-sama (talk) 23:11, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

P.S. "There aren't that many moments between being grabbed and being stabbed. I haven't read it and i can still see flaws... what a bad writer" --- Contribution not made by myself. F.Y.I


 * Sanders-sama, By you saying "the fate of the two is currently unknown" is suggesting they might be dead, Which isnt correct.  And i read simant's post, even though you deleted it and it wasnt rude or ignorant, he was correct and said it "subtle". Too much play by play is overkill. it just doesnt look nice when you state every single move.
 * And your spelling, if youre unsure of a how a word is spelled you could research it, you had so many mistakes.
 * and when youre editing multiple character pages, it would look better if you didnt copy and paste the same thing and add a few more details. try to make different structures.
 * And thats also why you mis-spelled alot, because you mis-spelled it the first time, then copied it, example you spelled "sasuke", "saskue" so many times.
 * And im saying this on Simants page because no-one will see it on yours, and you will probably delete it...--Shelldone (talk) 23:47, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Well I wasn't talking about what he wrote there - that is not the descirption box. The diction and language he used were far from passive. I did realise that I had spelt it wrong and agree that I talked too much in detail. (Oh and spelt not spelled.I'm a fan of irony) And your comment is directed at me, so why does everyone else need to see it? I deleted the content from my page as I don't like it untidy. But I fail to see how something directed at me has anything to do with anyone else. Also, we don't know what has happened between Sasuke and Naruto. "suggesting they might be dead. Which isnt correct" Isn't it? An explosion occured and it was left there. They MIGHT very well be dead or injured. The explosion could SUGGEST injury of some kind. - I never said death. Sanders-sama (talk) 23:59, March 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * First of all, youre using the word "spelt" in improper context... spelt is a species of wheat.... "spelled" is the correct word but for some weird reason people pronounce it with a "t" at the end. so before you try to correct me, make sure youre right.
 * You deleted it from your page because youre insecure about your mistakes and dont like being corrected, i assume, from what you are showing.
 * Maybe you were using the wrong word for what you were trying to say. Fate, basically means destiny or doom in the future, or an event. And also why would they be harmed? nothing happened yet, the cliffhanger is about naruto's decision and what he does next, The last scene is just the impact of the rasengan and chidori clashing, it doesnt necessarily mean they are hurt, big collisions always happen like this in naruto.


 * Well "spelt" is British English, you know the origins. "spelled" is American-English which isn't even a language just altered words of the real thing., like "Mom" instead of "Mum" or "color" instead of "colour"

Your some sort of shrink? How can you tell me what I feel. If I felt insecure why would I delete the top message too? Get your facts right, you don't even know me. And you might want to read 485 as it never showed Chidori or Rasengan in the last bit and Naruto has no shadow clone and not in Sage Mode. Do you know what has happened or what will? No. So it's UNKOWN. Sanders-sama (talk) 07:46, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

didnt know you were british, and im not, so youre still invalid for trying to correct me if you knew the differences. and i said " i assume, from what you are showing." And yes, he did have rasengan, it did show it. When kakashi was telling him to stay back, and he went anyways, you could see 2 clones. one held back kakashi, and one made tne rasengan with him. page 11. you could clearly see the rasengan on page 12. and on 13, it even says it. I'm right, youre wrong. thank you--Shelldone (talk) 08:02, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Your still wrong. No-one here says "you spelled that wrong." Its grammatically incorrect. It's spelt - deal with it. The first time, yes they both used their attacks. I'm talking of Page 17. The last page, where the cliff hanger is. You have even said it yourself. Sanders-sama (talk) 15:31, March 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * no im right, youre like really stupid. its "spelled" and "spelt" you even said it, spelled is usa, and spelt is uk. I dont have to conform to saying spelt if some people here are from uk. So idc if "no-one here says you spelled that wrong", i do, and im sure everyone from usa says spelled.  im not from uk so i really dont give a shit how you spell it. so how would i know that?
 * and the rasengan and chidori lasted that long, on the last page it shows their hands without rasengan and the chidori and then the impact.... do you know why? because thats where it ended. Its really stupid for you to think its something else. Do you even know what youre arguing about? I've already proved you wrong, so many times. Now just shut up.Shelldone (talk) 23:11, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Well guess what I don't care for what you have to say. you've made a simple situation - which had noting to do with you in the first place- into something biger than it should be. And you should give a shit - it's called respect for other people and the fact your speaking the English language. What you are saying doens'y make sense and it's people like you that create bad situatiosn, unconfortable for everyone. Obviously you have nothing better to do with yourself than to edit Wikipedia pages, so I'll leave you to that. Have a good life. Sanders-sama (talk) 17:50, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Actually i corrected you at first, then your stupidity got me mad. thats just how i am, i get mad at stupid people. I'll refrain myself from commenting on the other stupid remarks you just said. --Shelldone (talk) 06:32, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

'''Could we stop? please?''' Simant (talk) 06:34, March 6, 2010 (UTC) Hey,I ended it at "Have a good life." Sanders-sama (talk) 17:39, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Manga Debuts
Would it be possible to enter databooks, fanbooks, and artbooks as manga debuts? There are quite a few characters and jutsu that could use this. --ShounenSuki (talk 10:59, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think page numbers are necessary, as we don't use them with manga chapters either. Just First Databook or Hiden: Sha no Sho, whichever you prefer. --ShounenSuki (talk 21:27, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, Sha no Sho is the third databook ^^ Your solution is perfectly fine, though. --ShounenSuki (talk 13:32, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Inuzuka
What's wrong with Inuzuka clan? The species filter is only working with Kiba and Akamaru. ~SnapperTo 19:36, March 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * That sounded easier than should be allowed. ~SnapperTo 20:02, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

The Viz Translation
You need to seriously start reading shonen jump. Its in this months issue.If you still say no then other pages that have it listed as vizs translation such as inferno style and gale release should be removed as well.Saimaroimaru (talk) 05:15, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Saw the problem, nvm.Saimaroimaru (talk) 05:20, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Directly Derived Jutsu
I know I'm getting a bit annoying, but I have yet another suggestion for the infoboxes ^^;

Would it be possible for the directly derived jutsu list in the jutsu infobox to also list jutsu that are derived from the directly derived jutsu? For example:

Rasengan's directly derived jutsu:
 * Wind Release: Rasengan
 * Wind Release: Rasenshuriken
 * Typhoon Water Vortex Technique
 * Great Ball Rasengan
 * Super Great Ball Rasengan
 * Sage Art: Great Ball Rasengan
 * Sage Technique: Rasenrengan
 * Etcetera

--ShounenSuki (talk 15:39, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks perfect. I doubt there are many techniques with more than two or three generations of derived jutsu and loops should logically not exist. One can't derive a technique from a technique it was derived from, even if there are generations in-between.
 * Now that we're on the topic of jutsu lists, should the jutsu infobox really list movie-only and game-only techniques as well? --ShounenSuki (talk 18:40, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * How on earth do those image categories get in that list?
 * As for the Rasengan list, it should look a bit like the example list I made above. I believe I put in all canon Rasengan variants... It should be a lot smaller than the list with the movie and game variants included. --ShounenSuki (talk 19:26, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * That explains it. So all that has to be done is to put them in a parent category? --ShounenSuki (talk 20:34, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * That would seem like a good plan. --ShounenSuki (talk 08:04, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a fine plan. It would really clean up the infoboxes, I think. --ShounenSuki (talk 22:57, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

It looks perfect ^^ --ShounenSuki (talk 00:22, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Stats
I meant databook stats(favorite food and etc...) Lidor 18:41, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Block
Fixed. Jacce | Talk 06:26, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Spanish
Well, There are two doubling, one made only for Spain and the other made in Mexico for Latin America Pein88

Re:Hinata Hyuga
What I was trying to say is that she could have activated it later, plus there's a mark idicating movement for her right eye but not her left.--Deva 27 (talk) 05:04, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Astrological Signs
I'd say steal away ^^ make sure you attribute them properly, though. --ShounenSuki (talk 19:32, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good to me ^^ --ShounenSuki (talk 20:39, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Simant, I noticed on Naruto's page that his sign and gender symbol wasn't appearing while other pages are. Is there any reason for this or is it just a code error?  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 03:15, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Re: MoS
That assumes they want to make an article about a character. ~SnapperTo 22:22, March 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * The few examples of new, and subsequently deleted, articles that I've seen don't inspire much confidence that people can remove things they don't need. The default setup is easy to ignore for people who know what they're doing and easy to cleanup after for those who don't. ~SnapperTo 22:32, March 16, 2010 (UTC)