Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-36019309-20190114073523/@comment-26636534-20190205063028

Jason of the Mangekyou wrote:

War's theory of the use of the word 'concurrently' in the DB is kinda acceptable, but still not fully convincible. So yeah he kinda proved that part, but what he's failing to prove is how they'll break it, and well who can break it. SO yeah let's accept that his theory makes sense when he said that the DB statement is only limited to a specific point in the series (but then again there was never another tsukuyomi entry in the DB to deny anything that was stateed in the 2nd DB) and instead lets watch his argument on how non uchihas can break it. It's amazing how you can say this to someone else, but can't confirm it to me. Instead you direct something pointless to me, smh.

For your post directed to me, let's use an analogy: "You build a house on sure foundation", Likewise, you build a discussion on understanding. From your posts in response to mine, that understanding is not there, so we don't have a discussion.

Now, is it not the opposition's stance that the databook is correct? So how can my statements be not "fully convincible" when it is taken literally from the databook??

As for your other questions on who can break it and how? It's obvious from my question, that the point I was trying to make was Itachi doesn't have the authority to limit all shinobi. That doesn't mean I must know who can break Tsukuyomi and how, only that it's possible.

I'm not avoiding your question or losing this, because we haven't been debating. You have not understood my first point so we can't move on.