User talk:Cerez365

New Images
The past 3 or 4 images I've uploaded appear as the old version even though under the image summary you can see that I've uploaded a new one. Do you think it's a cache problem, because I've went on three different browsers and the same things happen. ~ Fmakck → Talk → Contributions 00:34, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh ok, and one more thing, can you teach me how to make an archive, it's almost about time for me to make one. ~ Fmakck → Talk → Contributions 00:45, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Block
Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:26, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 08:43, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 21:48, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:16, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 12:05, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:03, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:33, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

I warned him. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 12:15, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 14:15, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:34, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:50, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:14, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:39, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:10, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:57, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:25, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:10, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:31, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:56, April 7, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:26, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:42, April 11, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:36, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:52, April 13, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:30, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Pakura
Why are you editing Pakura page? Stop it. --Faust-RSI (talk) 13:14, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't get your point. In English, please. Sorry, if you're not a native-speaker.
 * Common, another dude was deleting changes only because there was no proof of the resemblance (as in Shippuuden movie case). And now you are telling me the pictures are not necessary? This web-page is sure messy.
 * you're calling me noob, yet you haven't add that link to unknown Iwa kunoichi page *facepalm* I don't care about your stupid rules or "methodology", because those are not helping people to see some interesting facts, as simple pictures do. I can't care about you less, but I care about people that reading this wiki and 98% of them don't give a shit about your "methodology". Stop being a little bitch and improve you English - it sucks, really.

Vacuum Wave
I can quite easily cope with you reverting and referring to my edits as fluff, if the information can appear and be justified as unnecessary but on this occassion, would you please mind explaining what you find so unnecessary about mentioning an evident weakness in the technique in question that was even exploited by Sasuke in chapter 477. Blackstar1 (talk) 00:43, February 15, 2011 (UTC)


 * Firstly let me say thank you and to also apologize, as it appears you have misinterpreted what I have said, I was instead referring to the article Wind Release: Vacuum Wave, where I wrote about how the technique could be avoided. I have no issue with the reverts on other pages and had assumed that you had done so for the reasons you stated anyway, however, could you please refrain from remarking "fluff" when correcting or simplifying most of my edits, at least not in every circumstance. I understand your reasons for doing so and on most occasions I'd be the first to admit that it's justified, but I am attempting to temper my writing so it is more available yet you must be able to understand that the term can be used negatively and seeing it repeatedly attached to your edits can quickly become annoying, even if it is intended constructively. Hopefully, I don't give you the wrong impression of myself, I really don't mind criticism but I felt that this needed to be said before a larger misunderstanding occurs. Blackstar1 (talk) 01:18, February 15, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Blackstar1 (talk) 01:33, February 15, 2011 (UTC)

Um...
You may remove this if wish, but I wanted to clarify something. Regarding the edit on the Chibi page, it was an accident. I was trying to undo a previous edit by someone else and forgot to erase what they did before I published. I'm also fairly new to wiki editing so don't think of me as a vandal or something. I probably shouldn't feel this way, but I am easily intimidated by people on sites like this so I was kinda afraid to even send this.--Kohaku-chan (talk) 13:00, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

Prajñā Group Image
As for, I uploaded the image only to see that you had already done so, so I reverted mine because I guess my cache was acting up and I saw that both of the images were the same.  ~ Fmakck© → Talk → Contributions ~ 21:26, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

About Naruto's Jinchuuriki forms
Could you please explain why Naruto's Jinchuuriki forms isn't separated as Version 1 and Version 2?? If you don't mind, please link the reasons or the talk page related to it. --N 21 (talk) 11:45, February 18, 2011 (UTC)

That doesn't really make sense to me. Both Naruto and Bee's forms are no different IMO. You say Version 2 is a humanoid Bijuu form. That's the same as 4-tails up. Even Yamato states so. I think I sort of get what you mean about him not having Version 2. It's because of the new cloak and the fact that Kyuubi's unwilling to cooperate with him so therefore he can't reach Version 2. But still, I think it should still be classified since we're looking at it's characteristics. Not the amount of control Naruto has over his forms.

Image
Why did you switch back the Akatsuchi pictures. There isn't a difference between the anime and manga. Fishboy144 (talk) 19:30, February 19, 2011 (UTC)

Tsukuyomi
Why did you delete Madara from users? The things that were said needed to be added says to add him as a user because Madara talks about his Moon Eye Plan. And it involves Tsukuomi.

Ok sorry about that and I did add him back so I just deleted him and if you need help editing pages just let me know. Brian Waldbart (talk) 04:14, February 20, 2011 (UTC) Brian Waldbart

Amaterasu
Why did you delete the picture of Itachi's bleeding eyes? Brian Waldbart (talk) 06:03, February 20, 2011 (UTC)Brian Waldbart

Eps
Where do you watch the new episodes when they first debut? I always use Narutobase, but that quality is not so good and is why I never upload images when the episodes first comes out.  ~ Fmakck© → Talk → Contributions ~ 13:14, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * But sadly I fall in the category of people who have to wait 7 days before watching the new ep. on Crunchyroll.  ~ Fmakck© → Talk → Contributions ~ 13:34, February 24, 2011 (UTC)

Unnamed yotsuki clan member
Do you need any pictures of him? LIGHTNING HAWK (talk) 19:24, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Yotsuki Image
This time you beat me by 3 seconds...  ~ Fmakck© → Talk → Contributions ~ 19:25, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Haha, I didn't mean it as a competition, just sayin' this has happened like 2 or 3 times.  ~ Fmakck© → Talk → Contributions ~ 19:31, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Flying Thunder God Technique
http://boxmamga.com/online_manga/image_1001-505.html?t=499&n=13 Yamato Announces to Killer Bee that he wasn't quite at the Forth's Level

Re: messages
Tomoegozen, sorry. --Hazel-rah (talk) 19:32, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Cleaver Sword Image
Hi i want to ask you a question? why did you delete the cleaver sword anime pic?? plz reply

Re: Images
I see you added the fair use rationale and license for the images already. Thanks, and I'll make sure I add them next time. Gentle Moonlight (talk) 19:57, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

darui
Ok... I'm sorry LIGHTNING HAWK (talk) 11:37, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Don't you think that Darui should have a videogame section? LIGHTNING HAWK (talk) 11:41, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Uchiwa
Madara calls it the. —ShounenSuki (talk 12:48, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Translations....
Hi I'm Morgan silve. I just need to know how to say "light release" and "prism release" in japanese.Luis Gabriel Lamborgini  21:58, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

I'm so sorry, I really didn't know!! :P. Eitherway, I'm terribly sorry for wasting your time. Thank-you for letting me know who was in charge of translations.Luis Gabriel Lamborgini  01:35, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Oh it's ok, it's just that I want to make good friends with everyone in this Wikia. Is it ok if I show you my own Wikia? Hopefully it wouldn't be advertizing..Luis Gabriel Lamborgini  01:48, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

My site is www.doradies.wikia.com. again you let me tell you it, so hopefully it wouldn't be considered vandalization!! =) Luis Gabriel Lamborgini  02:58, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

I hope it was funny, haha! Well thank-you for your help. Luis Gabriel Lamborgini  20:18, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Fix it
Thanks :D Thatll be great!

Shippuuden 204 IMages
It feel like we are having an upload race today :D --Gojita (talk) 12:41, March 24, 2011 (UTC)Gojita

Re: 530 revisited
Shikaku says —ShounenSuki (talk 19:52, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Height & Weight
Ok, but out of fairness, if a character had HIV/AIDS, I do think that would constitute at least one sentence...

Re: 10 Tails image
I didn't upload it. Also how come we aren't using the two images from the anime in the article? Why should we only have the icon there that someone made instead of something actually from the series? It's kind of weird. And why is the infobox locked? --_-- It's like no one wants to improve the article at all. Banan 14kab  00:34, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

LRBF
That would be my fault. I saw that despite being deleted, it was still being listed in semantic lists, and I was told that recreating the article with no semantic content can be used to overwrite this. Apparently, it worked before in the Yu-Gi-Oh wiki. If this works, we can finally get rid of those red links that show up in semantic lists. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:09, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Tensei
I noticed that too. The additional filters show up under the new terms, but the jutsu themselves show up under the old terms. I was going to ask Simant if they didn't fix themselves after a week. ~SnapperTo 22:20, April 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't think I can actually fix it. I'm not even certain Simant could fix it. It's one of the many semantic peculiarities that has no apparent cause. ~SnapperTo 22:48, April 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * It's a problem for barriers too.
 * Yes, that is a solution. It won't allow the results to be filtered further but it will at least make those list-links usable. ~SnapperTo 00:07, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Ao's article
How come we aren't using the other Byakugan image for Ao's article? Banan 14kab  05:28, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Nobles
The other three are the Aburame clan, the Hyūga clan, and the Uchiha clan. —ShounenSuki (talk 21:20, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * First databook, page 215. —ShounenSuki (talk 21:50, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * This should probably be added to the Konohagakure article. S im A nt 22:11, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Possible issue
I'm not sure what you are seeing... S im A nt 22:11, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Whether or not there's a space doesn't make a difference. This happens every once in a while with Mangekyō Sharingan. To fix it, you just change something about the article. I usually add a link, change a word, move something, etc. ~SnapperTo 01:44, April 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * It may be related to some wiki image feature. The Mangekyō article was previously the only one to have this sort of problem and it's had an image gallery for a long time. And now the same problem is appearing in pages that are taking advantage of the slideshow feature. It's suspicious. ~SnapperTo 03:34, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Images
maybe I should have been careful in editing images.I now edit in proper way. -- 13:50, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Reporting
It is probably best. They probably won't get blocked, but I can keep an eye on them. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:53, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks.
Thanks Cerez. That was a great edit. Much more clearer then the previous wording (: