User talk:Wiserline Mare-Silverus

Hello Wiserline Mare-Silverus, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the User:Wiserline Mare-Silverus page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- TheUltimate3 (Talk) 20:44, 20 June 2009


 * Dont think thats gonna stop....y dont u provide a source....to prove it..it looks like u'r guessing, or adding u'r own conclusion...a collabaration jutsu is done between two or more ninjutsu users, Naruto using the shadow clone still make it 1 person, anyway, The Ultimate3 asked Shounsuki to check it out, till then, stop adding it..AlienGamer | Talk 20:49, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Collaboration jutsu
I'm not denying that it showed up in the filler arc. I'm arguing that a lot on that page either has little to do with it, or are just grasping at straws. Things like the Sound Four's jutsu can't be known to be a collaboration jutsu just because it has four people doing it. It is completely possible that it only needs one to make it work, we don't know.

TL;DR: A lot on that page simply looks like "Ok there is a new concept, now let me apply it to everything.". It doesn't work like that.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 13:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries
I realize that many your edits have the unfortunate habit of being reverted, but please start using edit summaries and/or talk pages. Repeatedly making the same edit without an explanation does not encourage people to agree with you. ~SnapperTo 17:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

If you please
If you want to bring up a discussion about the Abilities section in Naruto's page, do so in the Talk Page Edit Warring solves nothing.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 17:50, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Seriously I just want to know now
In most of your edits, most of which I don't have to remind you get reverted, you add a large amount of information. A large amount, the 1k increase in the Shinobi page is an example of this. So I want to ask you now, where are you getting this information? Is it written down, is it in a databook somewhere, are you finding it online or are you just coming up with it off the top of your head.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 15:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

It was something I first noiced during the Eight-Tails arc, Killerbee discribed Karin as a 'Sensor' type. Later during the Fire Temple arc, Asuma discribed Naruto and Sora as 'Power' types. He also described Tamari as a strategist just like Shikamaru. During the on-going Five Kage Summit arc the main characters are asked about Sasuke's techniques and his fighting style. Throughout the series, you see ninja that fall under certin catagories of fighting styles, thats what I'm referring to by discribing these 'Ninja Types'.

--Wiserline Mare-Silverus 16:22, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I see, I see. The problem is however, that "ninja types" as far as I can gather isn't a real type. Just a ninja specializing in one field over an other, which we've known forever. Until something comes up that specifically states that there are ninja types then it shouldn't be added.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 15:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkpages

 * Do u evr read edit summaries, or bother to take up an issue in a talkpage and get the general conceous of the rest of the community....Just letting u know, editors will keep revertin it, unless u start to use a talkpage, or at the very least gave an edit summary...--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 15:34, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Please read edit summaries... and stop repeating the same edit without taking it to a talkpage. Simant (talk) 18:32, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Kenjutsu
Uh, what is this kenjutsu you are refering to on zabuza's page. Simant (talk) 16:49, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

Naruto Databook
Could you please stop adding/changing info in the sections According to the naruto databook, stuff that happens in the anime, is not according to the databook. You should note that commas, periods, colons, semicolons, colons, and exclamation marks all require that the quotation marks to be closed to the right. Simant (talk) 19:59, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

Ages
Could you please stop adding who is the oldest, youngest, or whatever of certain teams? Unless you have a way to prove it, it is baseless speculation. --ShounenSuki (talk 21:59, November 15, 2009 (UTC)


 * Do you know what year they were born in? Because if you do not, it is impossible to tell who is older and who is younger --ShounenSuki (talk 18:33, November 16, 2009 (UTC)


 * Maybe I should explain myself. I feel I was a little curt.
 * I'll show you why your reasoning isn't necessarily correct, using an example. Let's take everyone who is the same age as Naruto, listed in order of birthday:
 * Gaara (19th January)
 * Shino (23rd January)
 * Suigetsu (18th February)
 * Sakura (28th March)
 * Chōji (1st May)
 * Karin (20th June)
 * Kiba (7th July)
 * Sasuke (23rd July)
 * Shikamaru (22nd September)
 * Ino (23rd September)
 * Naruto (10th October)
 * Hinata (27th December)
 * If you take this list as it is, you would assume Gaara is the oldest and Hinata the youngest. However, this isn't necessarily the case.
 * All these characters were twelve at the time of first databook. This databook was up-to-date to the third chūnin exam, which was about a month after the first chūnin exam, which was on 1st July. So let's assume the first databook is accurate to 10th August. To have all the characters 12 at this date, Shikamaru, Ino, Naruto, and Hinata have to be born in the year before the rest. This would make Shikamaru the oldest and Sasuke the youngest. Ergo, your assumption isn't necessarily correct.
 * All this is assuming they were actually 12 at the time of the databook. If those ages were merely a generalisation, it could change the order even more.
 * In this case, we could estimate their relative ages by taking the beginning of the school year in Japan, which is in the beginning of April. Assuming a beginning of 1st April, Chōji would become the oldest and Sakura the youngest. Again, I have proven my point. --ShounenSuki (talk 21:29, November 16, 2009 (UTC)