User talk:Omnibender

Thank You Omnibender. I'll check back through those episodes. Rayfire 15:10, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Re Tsunade
Don't worry about it.--TheUltimate3 01:06, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Ack
Erm, Omnibender... I merged your userpage which was being used like a talkpage, with your talkpage... Cept... A bug is stopping me from undeleting the old stuff to actually merge it. ^_^ heh, sorry, I'll poke the techs... ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion Aug 25, 2008 @ 01:32 (UTC)

Rollback
Thanks. Jacce 04:58, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Hi Omni. I didn't know you come here too. Zero 18:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

I dont do much editting here too. Its a recent thing. Besides, My signature is incompatable here so I have to manually write my talk page link and then use five tildes to put a signature. Bummer, huh? But I do love watching Naruto. Zero 18:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Block
Done. Thanks for the information. Jacce 20:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

You are always welcome. Jacce 20:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 06:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

The idea has crossed my mind, but so far I missed people like "Billyisbored" and unnamed vandals. Blocking pages will happend when there is major revert war or vandalism. Jacce 17:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 20:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Taken care of. Jacce 06:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks. Jacce 07:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Dantman took care of it. Jacce 04:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 19:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 21:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Taken care of. Jacce 20:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 05:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 05:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Taken care of. Jacce 14:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 06:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 18:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Fixed. Jacce 16:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Jacce 06:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 18:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 05:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 17:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Jacce 05:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 17:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Jacce 05:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Many this time. Jacce 05:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Everything taken care of. Jacce 05:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 18:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Jacce 06:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 20:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Jacce 05:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce 19:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 16:55, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 04:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 04:40, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

TheUltimate3 fixed it. Jacce | Talk 06:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Snapper2 fixed it. Jacce | Talk 05:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 03:54, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 05:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 18:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 05:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 03:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 05:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 12:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 17:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 12:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked and protected. Jacce | Talk 05:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:46, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 17:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 17:27, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 07:41, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 17:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 15:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 04:46, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:45, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 18:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:53, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 18:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked and protected. Jacce | Talk 07:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:59, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 04:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 04:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 04:58, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

ShounenSuki fixed it. Jacce | Talk 04:54, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 04:10, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 05:40, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:12, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

Charitwo fixed it. Jacce | Talk 04:37, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

I'm used to it. Blocked. Jacce | Talk 02:56, October 21, 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 15:21, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 12:48, October 25, 2009 (UTC)

I tried with a warning, if it doesn't help, it will be blocking. Jacce | Talk 18:43, October 25, 2009 (UTC)

Re: protection
Naruto is protected so only users can edit it, I hope that will be enough. The other two are protected for a few days. Jacce 05:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Opinion
Yes, and I left my opinion on Talk:Madara Uchiha. Sorry for not telling you on your talk page, I was in a bit of a hurry. Jacce 14:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Telicons
How do you make a telicon, because the Hyuga one is wrong. If anything it should be the Yin Yang symbol since it's everywhere in their clan, even their jutsus.

Also, I trying to create a "Sacred Items" page where the Three Treasures, First Hokage's Necklace, the Totsuki sword will be etc. Is that okay? Or would "Legendary Items" fit better?

Nature Transformation Page

 * You do realis that  |  is used when u want to add a different name than the link..eg.. Sasuke Uchiha, u just want it to show Sasuke then = Sasuke ...In the nature transformation page  |  is unnecessary..AlienGamer | Talk 21:57, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh...allrite then..AlienGamer | Talk 22:04, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm also.. sorr...y. Simant (talk) 22:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

No problem, not many people use it to change the sortname in categories, so not many people know about it. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Naruto Shippuden Movie 3
Where did you see naruto shippuden movie 3 (even if it isn't eng sub)? Cooltamerboy (talk) 20:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC).

So you didn't watch it? And where did you ever know about the chirema technique? Cooltamerboy (talk) 21:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC).

Re: SVG program
I use a programme called Inkscape. But wouldn't it be easier to make a table or something? Unless you have something special in mind, of course. --ShounenSuki (talk 20:03, October 3, 2009 (UTC)


 * you mean something like this?:

Elemental recomposition table
 * Feel free to use this template as you see fit. If not, then I advise you to get Inkscape and use that. It's free and quite simple to use. If you need any help with it, feel free to ask. --ShounenSuki (talk 21:11, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * I say it looks just fine. It'll look better with more natures incorporated, but I have no doubt that'll happen in due time. --ShounenSuki (talk 21:55, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * With a bit of luck, it won't be too long before the table can be completed ^^ --ShounenSuki (talk 22:32, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you still planning to add the table to the Nature Transformation article? Right now, people are messing around with images and such, but I feel a simple table that can be easily modified is much better. --ShounenSuki (talk 23:29, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * Would it really be necessary to turn it into a template? --ShounenSuki (talk 23:36, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

It looks perfectly fine to me. I'd say add it. --ShounenSuki (talk 17:03, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Warning
Thank you for notifying me. --ShounenSuki (talk 19:39, October 5, 2009 (UTC)


 * My god... How popular can vandalism be? --ShounenSuki (talk 20:06, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Kiba
Why you erased what i've just wrote? The manga is already online!!!!! You can check it in www.narutobase.com So please, check first, then you can erase whatever you want --Kiba91 (talk) 00:10, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * why is that an spoiler? :S the manga just was release one day earlier... the manga is in an official site --Kiba91 (talk) 00:30, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * kind of nonsense but well, tomorrow i'll rewrite what i've just done --Kiba91 (talk) 00:40, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Spoilerblocks
Actually I knew the contents of this chapter as early as Monday. Like I tokd Hakinu, I make the effort to knew what is gonna happen at all times. The Friday thing is to ensure that everyone who can know WILL know, as most people don't go to the various translator websites.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 01:23, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

Senju
All right.All right.it's just a thought.No need to hack me up24.161.126.148 (talk) 01:07, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

King of Hell
Why isn't the King of Hell not a sealing technique?

Fūinjutsu (封印術, Sealing Techniques) are a type of jutsu that seal objects, living beings, chakra, along with a wide variety of other things within another object.

That's what it's doing, taking Life Force energy from its victims and storing it within itself. It can even release Life Force energy that it has within itself to those recently killed.

It's the same as the Dead Demon Consuming Seal, minus taking the victim's soul.

The King of Hell isn't taking the victim's soul, it's taking their Life Force energy (essential chakra), which everyone alive has. That's why Chiyo was able to bring Gaara back to life by transferring her Life Force energy into him, allowing his soul to return to his body. So when Nagato used the Outer Path: Samsara of Heavenly Life Technique, the King of Hell was restoring Life Force energy to the recently deceased bodies, rejuvenating them.

We know what a soul looks like Soul Removal, so the King of Hell is surely not taking their souls. He's taking their Life Force energy and sealing it within itself, similar to how the Death God seals souls within itself.

What I meant be rejuvenating was that the restored Life Force energy heals the body as well, repairing the injuries that prevented the body from functioning.

When the King of Hell takes the Life Force energy of the victim, it eats it, indicating that it's storing it within itself. But I'll give you that it's not said anywhere that the King of Hell is sealing the energy, and that there's no Sealing Mark left behind (that we can see). So I'll let this drop.

However, let me say this one thing. The King of Hell is terrible at interrogating, since it kills the victim that has the info. The Human Path is much better at interrogations since it just takes the info from the victim's mind. That's why I say the King of Hell's main function isn't interrogation, but "removing" the Life Force energy of beings that have done negative actions/karma (e.g. lying). Again, as an interrogation method, it's not that useful. But if its able to remove impure Life Forces, such as demons or truly evil individuals, it can be quite useful, especially in the days of the Sage of the Six Paths.

For a lack of a better word, the Life Force energy the King of Hell is restoring is "generic". Since it's pretty much energy that is essential for life, it can be transferred to any deceased body. Similar to how Chiyo can transfer her Life Force to Gaara. The Life Force didn't belong to Gaara, but even so he could still use it. So the Life Force energy that was restored to Kakashi and Fukasaku was not the energy they "originally" had, but the Life Force energy of other individuals that have been collected by the King of Hell deity, which has been around before Nagato, perhaps even before the Sage.

But again it's never said if Nagto had the King of Hell release the Life Force energy that was stored within itself, or if it was simply acting as a medium for Nagato. So I'll let it drop. Hopefully the next Databook will give some more info on the summon/deity.

Re: Ideas
I'm not sure what good I can do. Personally, I don't think we even need that large list. What we have works and is easy to read. Making it complicated and confusing is unnecessary and I believe should be avoided.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 23:51, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry bout that
Don't know what caused that problem, since I didn't modify the form before it happened. Simant (talk) 19:01, October 23, 2009 (UTC)