Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20160407135539/@comment-25141191-20160410192638

SS: Didn't say that, have a nice day, pal. If translators disagree they argue and i'm better knowing that people would argue over (x) topic. But this is not the point. Based on translators I know for the most part translators won't disagree as much as hyperbolically as you convey, notice that when people learn a language they develop a skill where "I don't know" to communicate? Nothing based on your own confirmation bias, what I find so laughable is that you consider those statements(FYI: that will be posted beneath, because that's what they are "beneath me")-palpably weak statements of being even worthy of being mentioned on such topic, I feel ashamed that you even bothered to bring up falsehoods that figuratively miss the entire point, especially taking into consideration that in your quote that you attempted dig, knowing that I never once conceded to anything you attempted to accuse me of purposely arguing in bad faith.

I will tell you what you cut out "If Viz is wrong, they're wrong". And if you can prove they're right on the translations (doubt that)-then prove it, instead of attempting to appeal to authority because of your own preconceived biases. Especially when you yourself doesn't even speak, read or decipher the language. That's the point of a translator. And if you don't want to address that, I don't owe you a single reply more.. Have a nice day. Because again, you have absolutely no point.

List of non-sequiturs/straw-men I don't recall Seelentau being paid to translate for this wiki, nor do I recall him being paid to translate the entire series. No translator has the final authority or word on any subject on a wiki, these are not personal projects where one user gets to control every aspect of the site and dictate how things are formatted,they're community projects and one person's opinion does not overrule the entire wiki.