Forum:Part I and II pics in infobox?

What about this? Putting a character's Part I appearance (if they were in the first part first) and Part II appearance in the infobox? Now bring on a stupid reason why this isn't possible. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 04:47, June 14, 2012 (UTC)


 * hmmm... back then Star Blazer 5 caused this incident by using images which cause by breaking the image policy. i believe this is the reason. Kunoichi101 (talk) 04:49, June 14, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101

What about this? --OmegaRasengan (talk) 04:53, June 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * this is anime-only summoning beast. Kunoichi101 (talk) 05:17, June 14, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101

and somehow of course, this may be not like OnePiece wiki and Bleack wiki. according to the Star Blazer 5 user talk page from the edits section. Kunoichi101 (talk) 05:21, June 14, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101
 * Looking at the character's pages at One Piece Wiki and Bleach Wiki it does seem possible. It would be helpful to have that here though. - White Flash - (Talk) - 05:34, June 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * yes, true, but will the admins. agree with that? Kunoichi101 (talk) 00:54, June 15, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101
 * TheUltimate3 prefers just their original images. Keeps everything...simple. Especially because we have that little habit of having manga images when there is a discrepancy between manga and anime portrayals. This would just get stupid if we then decided to add Part II images as well.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 01:13, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Same as former.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 01:29, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

and there you have it. This discussion is concluded. 02:37, June 15, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101

TheUltimate3 is right — ¤ U LTIMATE S UPREME ¤ (T@lk) 05:31, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

Wait, can I voice out my opinion? This is a good idea, but the problem is the infoboxes with 'anime' and 'manga' images. ~IndxcvNovelist (talk 08:36, June 15, 2012 (UTC)