User talk:Kagutsuchi100

Edits
Please refrain from editing pages without stating accurate sources. Hypothetical information is not to be added to the wiki.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 06:05, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Sound Four
You are unnecessarily trying to find reasons why one group is stronger than another. One group is dead, the other is not. That's all that matters. Your reasoning is also flawed; the Sound Four needed the cursed seals to counteract the Retrieval Team's help, but the Retrieval Team didn't need help until after the Sound Four activated their cursed seals. ~SnapperTo 22:54, March 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * That depends on your definition of "help", which we've already discussed. ~SnapperTo 23:07, March 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * But, again, you aren't being consistent. Who needed what help?
 * Choji - pills
 * Jirobo - cursed seal
 * Without "help", Choji would have lost. With "help", Choji won by himself.
 * Neji - none
 * Kidomaru - cursed seal
 * Nothing to argue here.
 * Kiba and Akamaru - Kankuro
 * Sakon and Ukon - cursed seal
 * Could Sakon and Ukon have won by themselves? Maybe, but their use of the cursed seal turns this into a case of what-ifs.
 * Shikamaru - Temari
 * Tayuya - cursed seal
 * Without "help", Shikamaru would have won. Without external "help", Shikamaru would have lost.
 * Kimimaro and Lee weren't technically part of their respective teams, so I'm ignoring them. Either the only illegitimate kind of help is external help, meaning only Choji and Neji would have won, or all help is illegitimate, meaning Shikamaru and Neji and possibly Kiba would have won. With both options the Retrieval Team has at least a 50% success rate, so your claim doesn't work. ~SnapperTo 23:27, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Sasuke Uchiha
First Please create new sections when commenting on my talkpage for something you wish to talk to me about, second please sign you comments when leaving a comment on any talkpage; and lastly i removed your contribution from Sasuke's page because it was poorly written in that it appeared more as thoughts and opinions then what should be on an article. If you wish to add something to the article and are unsure about anything you are adding i recommend adding it to the talkpage first and have others look over it first to improve it's quality before placing it in a article.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 23:53, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Block: SuperN
Seams like he has explained his actions. Now you two can solve your problem by yourself. Jacce | Talk 04:59, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Orochimaru & Akatsuki
Kagustsuchi please sign you comments.

Orochimaru joined Akatsuki soon aftre his defection from Konoha, as stated by Jiraiya. This happened prior to Itachi massacring his clan and therefore leaving the village. With this information it is impossible to say Orochimaru joined to steal Itachi's body as Itachi wasn't in the organization yet.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 04:12, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not disputing why he left, I'm not disputing the fact that they were both in Akatsuki at the same time. I'm telling you Itachi wasn't in Akatsuki when Orochimaru joined thus he couldn't have joined to steal Itachi's body.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 04:19, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Orochimaru defected from Konoha 10+ years before the start of the series, Itachi defected from Konoha ~6 years before the start of the series. It is unlikely that they joined Akatsuki at the same time, and even more unlikely that Orochimaru joined after Itachi. ~SnapperTo 04:33, March 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * And don't think I agree with you. The trivia was stupid regardless of who was "right". ~SnapperTo 04:36, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

SuperN
Just to make one thing clear, has Snapper2 solved this problem? Jacce | Talk 05:58, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * You mentioned that SuperN has constantly been undoing other people's edits. Could you possibly give an example of him undoing an edit that was legitimate and did not need to be undone? This is quite a serious matter in my opinion, since I know SuperN as a reliable editor. --ShounenSuki (talk 21:54, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I checked the Akatsuki page and could only find legitimate edits made by SuperN. Please link me to what you consider to be a wrongful edit. You can find the urls for specific edit versions in the articles' revision histories, for example this one. --ShounenSuki (talk 22:38, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Then show me where he undoes a legitimate edit. --ShounenSuki (talk 22:50, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Those specific versions are the proof. Link to one in which SuperN undid a legitimate edit. --ShounenSuki (talk 22:57, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Kirin
Look at Kirin's Talkpage on the subject of Kirin vs Limelight.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 22:35, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I corrected the link.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 22:40, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I linked it in my first message. It's here --> Kirin's Talkpage <---. Just click the highlighted blue text between the arrows.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 22:47, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, it's a debate that can't come to a definitive answer due to the nature of both techniques and the locations of their use. This is most likely why neither page was changed.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 22:53, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * How would you change it? Post it in the talk page of Kirin though.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 22:57, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 23:11, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Yes
I have checked some of the pages you suggested ShounenSuki to look at, and came to his conclusion. If you want to bring up old edits and older versions of a page, just go to the page "history" and choose an instant. The button is placed right next to the "edit" button. Jacce | Talk 06:16, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Block
Blocked. Jacce | Talk 04:59, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Jacce | Talk 05:08, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 08:18, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Rasengan
The Old Monk's Prayer There you go.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 06:44, April 5, 2010 (UTC)