Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1018594-20150708054235/@comment-25043344-20150711154221

TheUltimate3 wrote: Well I kept my silence long enough. In the hopes of not sounding bias, I go with, but mainly because I don't believe this will really solve much.

Weekly or monthly evaluations will roll around, everyone will either lay on the sysop or bow before his/her magnificent light. The idea that sysops should be treated like the US Presidency if faulty because seriously. I feel a lot of this has to do with the entire SuperSajuuk Situation and quite frankly, a monthly or bi-monthly evaluation of sysops would not have changed the outcome of that situation for the better, if anything it had the potential of just making things worse.

I would rather the sysops be dealt with in a timelessly fashion at the time of the incident and not wait for a monthly or bi-monthly quote-unquote "This sysop did this!" thread. We clearly saw how that can turn out. Your argument makes sense. I wonder if it would be possible to change my vote...