Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-45510280-20200416210937/@comment-26636534-20200419220012

LegionZero wrote: Like i said, you are using wiki policy as an excuse to disregard statements. Like I said before, I explained my reasoning, yet you don't acknowledge/address that or any of the specific points I made. Nice dodge.

LegionZero wrote:

You are using your personal preference and wiki policy to justify telling another fan to disregard canon.

Sad part is, even by your own metric, the novel statement shouldnt be ignored because nothing contradicts it. That was my point as well, as the novel statement from Akatsuki:Hiden is not in conflict, but the Tsukuyomi usage on Izumi is in conflict with the anime. No, the sad part is that a wiki policy bothers you. And when I say my take on it, it bothers you even more.

LegionZero wrote:

Dont know, dont care. I dont know enough about the novels to start adding stuff to articles left and right and its not my job to do so. Nor is it anyone elses responsibility. You didnt get one im presumably because all of us thought the answer was self evident and because it was a pointless question Well, so much for your concern of the "novels being canon". Guess that stance fell just as quickly as your decorum.

LegionZero wrote:

Quit acting like your time is so valuable. You are just a nerd on a forum like the rest of us

In summary, neither you nor this wiki has the authority to tell someone that content deemed canon by the company is non-canon But I can tell them my opinion and what the wiki says. And you can say otherwise, but who cares anyway? lol.

In summary, I tried to engage with you, that didn't work out. Although, I do wonder if you actually could understand my points or not. Anyways, peace out.