Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1018594-20150721025435/@comment-4271790-20150721031212

NeedleJizo wrote: A rule such as that should be able to perfectly nullify some (well, at least one) pro-databook user(s) in the forums and prevent user(s) from trying to shove little-known databook stats down others' throats.
 * No databook stats. Actual feats or substantiated speculation (be able to back up any claims) only.

As long as it gets the flame wars down, I'm okay (though, this doesn't necessarily mean I support or oppose, btw).