Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-1732320-20160111174438/@comment-1207741-20160131072650

Sarutobii2 wrote: If a article says their dead, then correct it because the two are proven to be alive. There was nothing necessarily wrong because they aren't necessarily alive. One of the great benefits of wardrobe items is that there are multiple copies!

Sarutobii2 wrote: And a few unnamed Anbu having their own article is as much as an issue as unnamed techniques having their own article (which isn't an issue). You know what else technically isn't an issue? 4:3 images. Hair color. Inter-series observations. Yet despite the fact that these things are non-issues, something was done about them because the editor felt the wiki was marginally worse otherwise.

Sarutobii2 wrote: The wiki doesn't need to be trimmed of all information as you've been doing to countless articles and counting. You've demonstrated a couple of things with this sentence:
 * You're not actually looking at any of these edits of mine; you're seeing -17,528 in Special:RecentChanges and concluding that nothing good is happening. And your conclusion is wrong. There are at minimum two things in this diff which I trust you'd approve of:
 * rather than mention Tsunade lifting Gambunta's sword three times in her Abilities section, I "trimmed" it to being mentioned once
 * I "trimmed" her Search for Tsunade section from approximately 600 words to approximately 1100 words, which might actually satisfy the definition of "expansion"


 * You are evidently opposed to the whole idea of editing a wiki. If something was good enough in 2011, there's absolutely no reason for it to ever be changed for any reason in history of the universe. This, basically, is what you're saying.
 * You don't actually have an argument and are merely picking whichever side your subjectively-favored articles happen to fall on. And that's alright. You're allowed to have articles you like. But you should try harder to be cognizant of when you're doing that.