User talk:SuperSajuuk

Notice: This talkpage may be archived without warning.

WARNING: If you post on this talkpage with intimidating behaviour or harassment, you will be blocked by a sysop on sight!

Where have you been...
...because no one has followed that rule since it was posted. Not even the mods, which was about a year ago. Is this seriously something you just added without conversing with the mods because I don't see anything that approves of that rule. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 09:12, September 4, 2014 (UTC)


 * Unless you can provide proof in recent days that this rule is something that should be followed for now on within recent days, I'm reverting your edit. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 09:22, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * People making it later doesn't prove anything and you know that wasn't what I was asking. I need proof of you discussing with a mod of this rule being established from now on recently.--OmegaRasengan (talk) 09:28, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * I am saying that you did because you were the one that added that rule there from the page's edit history. Do not whine to me when I've been asking you to explain yourself thoroughly. And do not go making accusations that I'm "lying" to get you in trouble. I'm trying to have this situation dealt with, not getting you into trouble which you keep on insisting on to get me into trouble.--OmegaRasengan (talk) 09:35, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * You say that, and then I see this. The rule to delete pages before 3am was added by you according to the edit history. And regardless of the policy existing before that addition, nobody has correctly followed it. I leave Ultimate3 or whatever mod to settle this.--OmegaRasengan (talk) 09:49, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

Do we have a partnership with Crunchyroll that I'm unaware of? I'm not agreeing with this rule at all. ~Hakinu (talk 12:50, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

Uploading
Thanks for the tip on uploading images! :)
 * Sorry about the lack of signature! Hrathgrath (talk) 13:45, September 5, 2014 (UTC

re: kudos
It's stupid that it can be done in the first place, so why not?--Elveonora (talk) 12:42, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

Deadlock
I created this but had no idea about this page. Can you help me out? And also, which is more suitable to you? Thanks. -- WindStar7125   05:06, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * Seems like Snapper2 did the work. Never mind.-- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 02:36, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Images
Hello SuperSajuuk! Thank you for informing me that he was violating one of the rules of uploading, this does not repitirá! I'm new in narutopédia and with some difficulty in editing this.

...
...Um... are shipping discussions not allowed here or heavily frowned upon? I thought shippers and stuff weren't allowed here... I'm confused... -- WindStar7125   21:49, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Of course. Right here. I am very tired of seeing such unnecessary discussions on the wiki activity page.-- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:53, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes. Thank you. And if it were on a talk page, I could delete it? I'm not a rollback, wouldn't I get in trouble for deleting any talk page discussions? -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:58, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the head's up. I can already guess why such stupid (and somewhat uncomfortable) discussions are not permitted on this wiki, but I still want a full explanation why, please. Better I know things rather than make a hypothesis and guess why. :) -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 22:05, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh I know they can't be on the wiki, but I was talking about specifically why they can't be on the forums. A lot of fanon goes on in the forums, but what makes pairings/shippings different from other fanon on the forums?-- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 22:10, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. An unspoken rule. I get that. Anyway thanks. Also, can you show me where the agreement was to ban such unwarranted consultations? I'd like to see others' opinions on the matter please to get a better sense of the rules around here. If you can't, thanks anyway. :)-- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 22:24, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, thank you very much! I'll read this thing. Anyway, I apologize for not reporting this to you on an earlier date. I noticed the discussion when it was first created and I was like "Dafuq? That's not allowed here, right? Well, some sysop is going to lay down his authority, so I'll back off from this one and not get involved." Then I kept seeing the thread, much to my irritation, and then when I saw the discussion get close to 100 messages, I was like "Oh hell no. I have got to stop this idiocy from expanding and soiling this well-oiled wiki..." and that's how we got here. Again, I apologize for not noting this earlier. After reading the discussion you linked to me, I'll do my best to make sure this wiki doesn't become polluted with such ludicrousness and stupidity (yes, I used that word, for I am very against pairing discussions). So thanks again! :)-- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 22:43, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

... (again)
This qualifies as a what-if scenario, which isn't allowed, right?-- WindStar7125   23:50, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

Re: so...
I usually have been editing instead of double posting and you told me to tell @kind hearted on there talk page so i did. Yeah i'll use the preview from now on so you don't have to worry. even though there's nothing to worry about anyways. Your the only one that says my edits are useless and not needed while others say i am helpful like snapper22. Munchvtec (talk) 17:35, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

You have said on multiple occasions that my edits are useless and do nothing to help the wiki. I don't want a response to this message, just reminding you. Munchvtec (talk) 17:43, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

Re: MessageWallUserTags
A discussion first would be nice~Ultimate Supreme  02:07, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

I just had a look at the script and it assumes that you have walls enabled (even to work just on forums). So maybe you could ask on the script's talkpage about it or we could just do it like we do on Naruto Answers in article comments?--~Ultimate Supreme  14:46, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Opinion please
Last week I made a section on Kirisame's page about what he did in the OVA. I would like you to check if it's okay. Im asking because if it's bad I don't want to make anymore. Munchvtec (talk) 12:30, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Re: For the first time here, I'm gonna be real serious
You're input helps a lot. To be quite honest, I am not a fan of forums to begin with, and I'm tired of seeing them. Yes, they create arguments, and a lot of fanon takes place there. It really doesn't help the wiki, it just adds to a user's editcount. -- WindStar7125   12:15, September 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Then I think we should enforce it. For the time being, I've decided to take a break from forums unless I have to participate (such as reaching a consensus or executive decisions). Before, I couldn't help but respond to and correct the fanon that many users put on those forums (Example: "Naruto will get the Rinnegan"). But that leads to arguments worse than what we have on article talkpages. I thought forums were a way to end annoying edit conflicts, and other reasons attached to it. I also thought it was a way to talk about other Naruto-related things happening in the real world (such as updates on the Naruto: The Last movie). We've laid down the law on many things on this wiki, so why not Snapper2's thread? Don't get me wrong though. I'm not suggesting that we get rid of forums altogether or that I have an obscene hatred towards them or anything, but they've gotten out of hand. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:43, September 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Eh, you don't have to be sorry. I cause enough trouble there by fighting with other users. I decided to take a break because of one: myself, two: the fanon there, and three: the endless arguments. It's better for the wiki if I'm not there for the time being. I don't need to make things get off topic and heated because of remarks others make about me. Again, not trying to play the victim, I'm just as much a bully on these forums. It's one thing to have a relevant argument over the subject (like how it happens on article talkpages). It's another thing altogether when users (like myself and others) take things personally and argue about things that deviate from the topic at hand. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:57, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Kakashi introduction arc
Hey SuperSajuuk about the information on kakashi's page i deleted. Why is that information in Kakashi's introduction arc. I know its anime only content but it could of taken place anywhere from the start of the Land of Waves Arc to the Chūnin Exam Arc. Without knowing the precise time of those events inst a reason to put it in the introduction arc. --Kris.gilson.12 (talk) 11:12, September 23, 2014 (UTC)

Hey whats up
I don't even know if this the right place to ask this but I'll give it a try. I remember you saying that you are not able to make lets plays for the newer naruto games. im just curious as to why since others have made them. Munchvtec (talk) 14:02, September 24, 2014 (UTC)

re: moderator
Thanks for the privilege.--Elveonora (talk) 13:33, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * Hm, may you assist me with it a little? So:
 * First, I use this http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Special:MyPage/Sig right? What should I write there tho?
 * Second, once it's done, I use the name of the signature in special preferences and add mod next to it, right?
 * --Elveonora (talk) 13:55, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, works I guess--Elve Talk Page 14:30, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nah, thanks for the offer, but red is fine. Unless it's mandatory or something :P--Elve Talk Page 14:34, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

Sasuke page
what is thread sasuke page ? --Twelvethrower24 (talk) 16:58, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

Re: pairing threads
Noted, will do. Thank you.--Reliops (talk) 20:59, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * @Sajuuk, If I'm correct, I'd say @Reliops and others in the Chapter 693 thread are planning on trying to allow pairing discussions here. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:05, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * It seems that I'll have to make an exception on not participating in forum talk. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:08, September 25, 2014 (UTC)