Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-3279282-20160423171719/@comment-3279282-20160428202718

And yet, kudos show agreement (among other things). Would be nice if those nine users could voice their opinion in the thread, though (if not already done).

As it is, we have no "way" things are done with Japanese:
 * Nicknames and other terms are randomly added to intros, sometimes all are added, sometimes only a few => On what basis are they added? And why doesn't it suffice having them in the infobox (at the same height) and later in the text again? It would make the intros certainly more readable.
 * Sometimes, words get their Japanese originals and translations added, sometimes they don't. Best example being words like "natural energy". On what basis is this done and on what basis are the terms chosen?
 * As explained above, the third proposal was pretty much unnecessary and I'll probably just remove pointless translations when I find them, simply because they're pointless. I really don't think anyone would oppose this and even if, on what grounds?