Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-3279282-20150305160501/@comment-1207741-20150305181427

I think an article for any unnamed topic, whether character or ability or other, should meet two standards:
 * 1) Be of sufficient length. Length, in theory, is a sign of complexity and by extension value to a reader.
 * 2) Be linked to from multiple other articles. Links are a good indicator of both in-universe and out-of-universe significance.

SuperSajuuk wrote: They should not be forced to search through Karin's article to find a single line saying "she can allow allies to bite her to heal themselves", they should be able to find it clearly on a separate article, especially as in the case of Heal Bite, it's clearly notable and Karin has used it repeatedly in the past. Un-named or not, it gets a place on the wiki. But this illustrates recurring problems with unnamed topics. In the absence of a name, the only reliable way to find an article (assuming it exists) is to look through articles of related topics; a reader will need to look through Karin's article regardless of the article's existence. And - although this isn't the necessarily case of heal bite - if a reader is already looking at a character's article, then there's a good chance the character's article will be just as informative as the jutsu article.