Talk:Logistical Support and Medical Division

We shouldn't describe events in this article
I think we need to remove parts of the article that describe events. This article is meant to describe the organization and how it is setup not what happened plot-wise. If we leave it as it is, it will become cluttered and repetitive, since this information is described elsewhere. I will remove the event descriptions in this article after 24 hours of this posting unless I get a response.--Alastar 89 (talk) 18:16, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * This would also mean removing events from the other Allied Forces divisions. We need to have some description on what they did, their impact as in what they do affects are much more grand scale than regular teams. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:58, May 20, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't see why we need to reiterate the events that have taken place in the when the even/plot is being explained elsewhere, it just seems repetitive and unnecessary. This is supposed to be a reference, not a description of everything they have done. I would like to have this article be more like the Hokage article in that it explains the 'office' or position of Hokage without giving an account for every action a Hokage has done in office. This is supposed to give the reader a idea of what this department/division is supposed to do and the composition of the organization/division. A reader is supposed to be directed to this article if they don't understand what the division is, not for the purpose of a chronology. Also omitting this event information will lessen the chance of spoiling the story for people when they are looking for the description of the organization. I would like to edit this article within 24 hours, if you want to add something to the discussion then I will hold off until the discrepancy of how to present this article is dealt with.--Alastar 89 (talk) 01:26, May 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * The main reason I'm against it is because that would mean removing the events listing in the other division articles, which in some cases is a lot of information. I wouldn't oppose making the article shorter by making the description of the events shorter themselves, through removal of excessive detailing of events. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:48, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't agree with your suggestion. The word "Hokage" is just a term. That page and a page like this serves entirely different purposes. I don't see anything wrong with chronicling the major even surrounding any of the event in the same way we do for other teams. It also makes more sense that people can come to one article and see what the Medical division for example contributed instead of running to Shizune, Sakura's and 10 other people's pages to piece the events together. Additionally, if someone doesn't want the story to be spoiled for them, they really have no business on a wiki at all.--Cerez365™ Hyūga Symbol.svg 01:49, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * There's only one Hokage at a time, so it wouldn't make sense to discuss the position at it relates to the plot. There's also the fact that what the division does may have nothing to do with any one character, in which case, if the events were not covered here, they wouldn't be covered at all.
 * The structure and content of this article is the same as it is for the other divisions, which matches what all of the team articles have been doing for years.
 * And people shouldn't be using the wiki if they're worried about spoilers. ~SnapperTo 01:53, May 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Every team has its own "History" section, so why not this one? Yatanogarasu 01:58, May 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * To give you guys a better understanding of what I am driving at I should of used the Ninja Academy as an example. This 'division'/department is tasked with creating Ninjas which serve the Konohagakure. This concept of part of the whole is similar to what the Logistical support and medical division is to the Allied Shinobi Alliance, serving to heal its members and provide materials. The 'Allied Shinobi Alliance' *should* have the history and events described on its article page, the Alliance is an organization like the Ninja village Konohagakure. The article would mention the 'Logistical Support and Medical Division'(link to said divisions article), the article would be structured similar to the 'Ninja Academy' article ; it would describe the functions and processes of the division/department. If you are going to include a history it should state who leads/lead the said division, which would link to that persons article. The department 'history', if you can call it that, is actually the mission statement (what they do for the whole of the organization). The reason I made this an issue is because I believe the following statement within the 'Logistical Support and Medical Division' article isn't necessary to describing what the division is and its composition:

"Sakura Haruno joins the medics from her division. As the night drags on, three jōnin-level medics (Toyosa, Takemaru and Hino) are murdered. Suspecting that Akatsuki has managed to take control of someone, Neji Hyūga, having come to rest from overuse of his Byakugan, as well as to treat his injuries, volunteers to find the culprit. During his investigation, Neji kills two medics before proceeding to Sakura's location."

Why is this worth mentioning in this article, this could be mentioned in the Allied Shinobi Alliance under the 'Fourth Shinobi world war' article, where it can be explained in full. The team (Team Kakashi) article argument is an exception. I am just advocating for the proper categorization of information. Please respond if I miss something or I didn't make something clear, I would like to remove the above quote from the article; I believe it isn't necessary to the article. I understand what I am proposing here will be a pain to execute in relation to other articles but I think it would be the proper way in presenting the information.--Alastar 89 (talk) 03:16, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll agree that it isn't necessary to say Sakura specifically as all medical ninjas went to the compound but the rest of that is relevant to the division. If someone comes here and just wants to read up on a specific division say the medics then they can read this article and get the general idea of what the medics contributed instead of wading through the general article on the entire alliance to just find one bit of information. And just so you understand the Ninja Academy is a building not a team/unit. It works in my opinion.--Cerez365™ Hyūga Symbol.svg 03:25, May 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'll have to disagree with your position that the rest of the information after the mention of Sakura is necessary to convey their contribution. My reasoning behind this is you can state their contribution without re-stating the story or the introduction of details, it can be expressed as follows: 'The Logistical support and medical division helped provide materials and medical support to each of the fighting divisions to allow them to continue to fight. They also had to defend from sabotage from hostile forces.' This shows their contribution without the need of re-stating the story/plot. You can always mention they participated in the 'Fourth shinobi world war' which would give the who story.--Alastar 89 (talk) 03:38, May 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Cerez365, I understand the Ninja Academy is a building but it fulfills a role in the Leaf Village. They teach and train Ninjas, they are providing a service to the organization which is the Leaf Village. Much like what the Logistic/medical division is doing for the Allied Shinobi Alliance.--Alastar 89 (talk) 03:47, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

After thinking it over for 24 hours, I realized that the amount of work to fulfill what I propose would be a tremendous amount of work. Also the fact the community is lacking enthusiasm to restructure how the information is presented, I guess I have no choice but to lay to yeild the idea for now. I just get frustrated seeing articles on this website, whose length feels equivalent to the distance between the Earth and the moon; The countless articles repeating the story over an over instead of breaking down the information into smaller pieces that reference the main article.--Alastar 89 (talk) 06:26, May 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Articles should be self-contained to some extent. Needing to read three different articles just to find out about one topic is inconvenient. ~SnapperTo 07:08, May 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * I understand that but I was proposing a more definition or glossary-like article structure. Where the relevant events would all be explained in the "Fourth Shinobi world war" article but when they mention logistics/medic division; the reader would click the linked word which would describe what the division does and how they are made up/lead. Then they would go back and continue reading from that "main" article, much like a star graph. The surrounding articles would give definitions to the 'central' article when needed. --Alastar 89 (talk) 08:12, May 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * You're assuming people are only coming to this article from the Fourth War article, when in fact there are thirteen other articles that link here. So, if your hierarchy were used and I were to be directed here from Akimichi Clan, I would a) not find out all there is to know about the division - which is what I thought I'd get when I clicked the link - b) need to guess which link to use to get what I'm looking for (Fourth Great Shinobi War? Allied Shinobi Forces? Shizune?), and c) once I find the correct article, read through the entire thing just to get what is at most a paragraph of information. The current format may have redundancies spread across several articles, but it's only the editors, not the readers, who care about about redundancies. ~SnapperTo 18:03, May 23, 2011 (UTC)