Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-1514283-20140829001753/@comment-1512913-20140830114841

I will just for a moment return to the part about amount of editors. After thoroughly thinking about it, less editors is actually better:
 * Less unwanted edits, like vandalism
 * Thus easier to monitor and correct/revert edits

And we don't need high quantity of edits, we need quality edits. But for quality edits, quality editors are needed. I'm not one, that's why I don't bother to edit articles much in the first place, because I know there are those who can do it better, like Cerez. But just because I don't edit articles often doesn't mean I don't monitor them. My way of contribution to this wiki is through discussions on talkpages and forums and I want to make sure that X makes its way into the articles while Y doesn't and Z is removed. But another reason why I'm hesitant to edit article isn't just because I'm leaving that to people with better grammar and fancy vocabulary, but because there are too many articles. It's too hard to keep track of them all and if it were on me, I'd trim down the amount.

Fist, I don't think we need articles for videogame techniques, like at all. But it's too late deleting them now I guess, because that would disrespect those who put so much work into them, like Omni (even though I don't think he would care at this point).

Then, lots of articles could me merged. I don't know about you guys, but I'd rather have 2500 quality articles than 5500 half-assed and unnecessary ones.