Talk:Lava Release

Mei's Lava Release (yes, again)
The fourth databook states that 溶遁 is something only Mei can use. • Seelentau 愛 議 15:16, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Well then, what're we gonna do about it? Change Mei's version to "Dissolution Release" or what?--JOA2015:46, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's still called Lava Release though :/ A trivia note should suffice. It could be an advanced version of Lava Release. You should have no issues with this statement considering what you did to Typhoon Release. Munchvtec (talk) 15:47, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not Lava Release, it's Corrosion Release. Typhoon Release is some novel bullshit. • Seelentau 愛 議 15:52, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Corrosion is the viz name, no? They called Roshi's Lava Release Corrosion Style. Munchvtec (talk) 15:53, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * No, it's the literal translation. ShounenSuki explained it ages ago. Anyway, if it's something only Mei can use, it obviously can't be the same as the Lava Release the others use. • Seelentau 愛 議 15:56, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * It would still be under the Lava release name regardless. According to your idea, combining two chakra natures CAN create more than one advanced nature. Munchvtec (talk) 15:57, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * We go with what it's literally called. Lave Release. Corrosion is an alternate translation as far as i know. Make a trivia note. That's all. If this changes we may as well change everything we know about chakra natures. Magnet release would be screwed as well as Explosion and such. Munchvtec (talk) 16:05, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not my idea, it's the databook's idea. Also, you have literally zero knowledge in Japanese, so why do you think you can tell me what's the right thing to do? • Seelentau 愛 議 16:31, July 2, 2016 (UTC)

You're able to tell me what i know, how?? I'm so terribly sorry if i don't happen to know as much as you. Why even bother with talk pages when you're going to do whatever you want anyways? If this gets changed then we will have to change tons of stuff. Munchvtec (talk) 16:55, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Personally, I'd also rather keep it as trivia than making it a separate thing from Lava Release...--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 18:08, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Basically that ^ and according to the canon policy and how we've treated everything else on the wiki that was retconned, Mei's kekkie genkai/technique was retconned to be Lava in the Last Natuto the movie.  --Sarutobii2 (talk) 18:25, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * There was another user of 溶遁 in The Last? • Seelentau 愛 議 18:33, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * I think he is referring to the visual effect, where in the last it looked like lava instead of rubber, just like earlier in anime during summit.--Elve Talk Page 20:46, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * So it's just an animation mistake then? • Seelentau 愛 議 20:56, July 2, 2016 (UTC)

I would say so, yes. The animators during the summit and in the last simply decided to make her lava look like Roshi's instead of the syrup appearance.--Elve Talk Page 23:23, July 2, 2016 (UTC)


 * Also, if we were to decide on making "Corrosion Release" an actual, separate thing from Lava Release, it would debunk the general idea of "1 KK per two natures" (which we have been following so far). Because of that, unnecessary drama would stir up again, regarding Magnet & Explosion Release, which is something I'd love to avoid... So... Yeah, not to repeat myself, but I'd rather keep it as trivia..--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 23:28, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Exactly what i said @Berserker. Munchvtec (talk) 23:46, July 2, 2016 (UTC)


 * This seems to me to be more of a trivia note than anything. Official sources have gone back and forth with Corrosive and Lava, which leads me to believe, despite appearances, they are supposed to related in some way.--TheUltimate3 Akimichi Symbol.svg (talk) 00:00, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * Agreed with the above, just a trivia note. The fact that it is called "Corrosion Style" and "Lava Style" in different places to refer to the same thing supports the theory that they're probably related in some way, but was never really explained. --Sajuuk 00:02, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * I completely understand that but I think we somehow should make the difference more clear... I mean, the sentence doesn't imply that 溶遁 is an entirely different nature. But it does imply that there's more difference than just the Kanji. • Seelentau 愛 議 00:09, July 3, 2016 (UTC)

I was under the impression that that paragraph with the differences in kanji (fire vs water) was implying the difference with the different kanji, and the functional differences (Mei's Lava Release being rubber, everyone else's being molten rock) was mentioned in the article. (In fact I just checked. It does note the difference).--TheUltimate3 (talk) 00:33, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * Umm, Dodai is one with vulcanised rubber-like Lava Release, and that one uses fire-radical kanji, 熔. Mei's Lava Release is strong acidic mud. --JouXIII (talk) 00:56, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, it's just not enough, in my opinion. I mean, do you understand my point? The databook says that Mei's Corrosion Release is unique to her and it looks and works differently. It doesn't even have to do with lava, unlike rubber, for example. Also, the kanji is consequently different. The only time Lava Release was written as 溶遁 was in the book of Sha, at a time Mei didn't even exist. • Seelentau 愛 議 00:56, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * So going by the trivia, the only places that the water radical was used to refer to Rōshi's version were Sha no Sho and Kai no Sho, correct? Or is the mention of a "fanbook" in the trivia a mistake, seeing as it was released after Mei's introduction? The trivia could definitely be a lot clearer, especially with how it says the kanji are used interchangeably "nowadays" without establishing whether it is referring to in-universe or the real world.--BeyondRed (talk) 02:33, July 3, 2016 (UTC)

@Seel, can you please write what the databook actually says about it?--Elve Talk Page 07:54, July 3, 2016 (UTC)