Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1018594-20150708054235/@comment-28861328-20150711000957

But then there are those who like to claim that having their posts deleted/redacted/what-have-you is part of this "power abuse". So I'm just wondering, where do we draw the line?
 * You don't want drama, but these threads are going to be drama-magnets.
 * You want accountability, but we already have that and we know that it works. (refer to the case with Sajuuk).

So, basically, what I'm trying to get across here is that everything you mention the threads as being able to 'solve', can also be said to make them worse. There is already a system in place that has been proven to work, so why introduce an entirely new one, which will bring about even more problems in the long-run?

I'm not afraid of accountability. I use me as an example, because I'm the only one I can speak for. If I am genuinely harming users with my sysop rights, firstly I apologize (That never has nor ever will be my intention), and secondly steps should be taken to ensure I'm held accountable. Other sysops need to be notified and then, if they don't help you, Dantman will swoop in as he did now.

Starting 'accountability threads' is nice on paper, but in application it can go to hell in a hand-basket very quickly which is counterproductive when you consider the goal here is to reduce the instances of such situations.