Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20150609103822/@comment-25626003-20150609191525

Most of the people who are opposing like mad people haven't given one legitimate reason. Responses like the above "this is ridicuous", "this is getting out of hand" or "it hasn't hurt anyone so who cares" aren't legitimate and quite frankly shouldn't be considered at all. Anyway, my opinion (don't shoot!), if you're inactive and haven't shown any signs of coming back, why should he/she still those rights? Especially if the additions are made based on need? I just don't get it. If Dan could explain that one to me, I'd appreciate it.

EDIT: Not sure if what Snapper said above is really true or not either. Interesting if true though.