User talk:SuperSajuuk

Notice: This talkpage may be archived without warning.

Re: Scissor Pincers
I have restored your message and my own, on the relevant talk page. You should have thought about the message you were leaving before leaving it: no takebacksies mate ^_^ --Cerez 365 ™(talk) 23:15, November 17, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Kudos!
No problem, it is actually more fun to take part in the wiki instead of just reading the pages! ;) Norleon (talk) 19:22, November 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * okay, I will look through it!Norleon (talk) 12:55, November 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't really understand, the picture I uploaded has a better quality, that's the reason I uploaded it to begin with. ;) And if I upload every single picture again, we would have to delete the old ones, isn't that much more complicated than just reupload them via "Upload a new version of this file"?Norleon (talk) 12:57, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * ah, do you mean the comaprison between this one and that here?Norleon (talk) 13:09, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * aaaallright, no problem, I will keep it in mind. And first I thought it was wrong to upload the same picture in better quality! xDNorleon (talk) 13:20, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

Re: ...
Let these things be mentioned several times in the series, then they're welcome to be added there. --X29 00:51, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

Re: ...
I just arrived home, I had no idea he had been blocked until you told me. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:23, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * What the hell? Looking at the logs, something happened when I blocked an IP that added non-sense to the Hokage article about 15 minutes ago, and Cerez got blocked instead. I probably hit his username instead, since he's the one who reverted the change, and I hit block from the RC page. Mistake unmade. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:33, December 12, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your vigilance.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 05:35, December 14, 2012 (UTC)

Why ?
why do you keep taking down my topic. --Qtin Davis (talk) 13:03, December 27, 2012 (UTC)qtin

its about understanding the jutsu, which would further improve its description. same as everyone elses questions. Qtin Davis (talk) 13:05, December 27, 2012 (UTC)qtin

do you know how to edit the color in the infobox templates background? http://theforsakenseries.wikia.com/wiki/Templates Qtin Davis (talk) 02:32, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

Proxy vandal
Here are examples of the proxy vandal I mentioned in TU3's talk page:. And these are vandals which I'm not entirely convinced are the same as the above, but whose vandalism somewhat matches the above, but instead substitutes the page's content with random texts in other languages:. If you dig through block logs, you'll find other IPs who were blocked due to similar edits. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:07, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

Re: o.O
It's rare, but not unheard of. I don't download episodes, but I discovered that VLC media player can be used to stream online videos. I streamed the UNS3 video which featured the jinchūriki, there are scenes of Kinkaku using the technique near the end. All I had to do was pause at the right moment and use VLC's built-in screencap feature. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:04, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

COnfusion
You left a message on my page i am not entirely sure what you are talking about.--J spencer93 (talk) 01:15, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Re: File:Haido Front.jpg
Sorry, it's been too long since I posted that. I can't possibly remember that. ~Hakinu (talk 22:36, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Images
I don't see any problems with the images...and I also don't have a problem naming the images like this. In fact, I always think that giving them the original japanese names is way better than the english translation. I mean just look at this. It's horrible! xDNorleon (talk) 18:32, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Warning templates
Hey, you were gonna create a template for third warning, right? Is it ready?~ Ultimate  Supreme  11:06, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Nice ^_^~ Ultimate  Supreme  13:55, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps a little more styling would make them stand out from the rest of the messages ensuring that people don't miss them.~ Ultimate  Supreme  08:43, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

Done. Though I am not sure if the sigs should be inside the box or outside... What do you think?~ Ultimate  Supreme  13:10, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

image

 * I accept that Norleon images are better than my and it was stupid to post that argument, but you didn't have to go that far to block me out of the wiki. If you block me out, the wiki will be losing all my support and what I bring to ths wiki like: images, information, and ideas. I've learned from my mistakes in the past and I'll learn from this one too and I'll try to stop my reverting war habits but you went too far. I'm tired of you, your annoying, I don't want to hear from you again. If you were a real friend you or help to this wiki you would list out for me what I'm doing wrong and I'll stop it.--Droidkaju (talk) 14:41, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

Filenames
There is nothing wrong with the filenames that the user has chosen for the images or the fact that they copped the images (i'm assuming). If it's a case where you don't like the name the user has chosen as you oh so very often do not, feel free to put in a request to have them renamed. Poor filename would be PTNDGMNDKMDLTJ30559050.png, not actual descriptive names.--Cerez 365 ™(talk)14:56, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Move
I can't change the extensions, so you have to do a new upload of this and this. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 16:55, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

sig
done :)--DevaMK (talk) 16:20, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

Explain how I violated the image policy
You seem pretty adamant about keeping an inferior version of the Itachi and Nagato image, even though the panel at the bottom of this page was used for the article before that new image was ever uploaded [No links]. Can I ask how exactly uploading an image that better translates to that single panel is breaching the Image Policy? --M4ND0N (talk) 19:00, February 1, 2013 (UTC)


 * That would've been a better explanation up front instead of just "No." Thanks for clearing that up, even though a lot of time could have been saved if you said so from the start. I'll brush up on the policies next time, that was my bad. --M4ND0N (talk) 19:07, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

I was warned twice about the fair use rationale, so I'll admit to being lazy and not reading the entire image policy thoroughly enough. What else can I say? I didn't understand the rules, and now I do. I'll make sure to read the policy, but all in all I don't need justify myself any further than a simple "Sorry, I messed up, and I'll read it next time before I make radical changes to an article." So I'm not obligated to continue talking about this, even though I appreciate the money you spend putting up high res images. "I do this for a reason so I don't have all my good work and money wasted for people to destroy my images. " Now I understand that it's a sensitive issue for you, but I think you've made your point. --M4ND0N (talk) 19:21, February 1, 2013 (UTC)