Talk:Super Beasts Imitation Picture: Benevolent Kings

Name
I don't recall the attack ever being officially named. Yatanogarasu 09:41, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * It wasn't.--Cerez365 (talk) 11:56, January 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Does this really need its own page? None of the other things Sai created with his Chōjū Giga ever had their own pages. —ShounenSuki (talk 14:29, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's either we give them all articles or we do what we've always been doing and just add it to the Super Beast imitation Technique. I'm more in favour of the latter--Cerez365 (talk) 14:39, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree, its the same jutsu, just a different drawing.--Deva 27 (talk) 15:30, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * While I can see having its own entry in the next databook, this is a case that I think should not have its own jutsu article until given a databook entry. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:06, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hm, still, some of his moves have pretty distinct usages and regular forms. It strikes me as a bit odd to lump 'em all together. ZeroSD (talk) 13:55, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's why they were given annotations. --Cerez365 (talk) 14:24, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thinking about it, I say we should probably flesh out the descriptors in the main Ink article more, but we don't really need this one. ZeroSD (talk) 12:17, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

I think this Benevolent Kings is distinctive enough to be it's own jutsu. He isn't making human-sized animals, he's making two very large giants with great physical strength and seem to be fairly quick. To me it's as different from the normal Super Beat Imitation as Chidori Sword is from Chidori. UltimateDeadpool (talk) 00:32, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * How is it distinctive? It just shows off Sai's artistic ninjutsu skills. If the other pieces aren't getting their own article the only way this would've warranted one was if it had been named in the manga when Sai used it.--Cerez365 (talk) 00:43, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Which is why I think this should redirect to Super Beasts Imitation Picture. I can see this technique getting an entry in the next databook, but until then it's better not to have an article about it. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:47, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with you. Its a real big possibility that it' going to get its own article but for now...--Cerez365 (talk) 00:58, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

So, is this going to be deleted/redirected or what? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:50, January 26, 2011 (UTC)