User talk:Munchvtec

Userpage
Look, mate. Being rude about it isn't going to get you anywhere. It's stated quite clearly in the policy what you're not supposed to have on your user page. It's not supposed to be a profile of you as a fan. That's something you can direct to the Naruto Fanon page instead. I'm not agreeing entirely with the policy, but it's the way things are. Calling people asshole isn't going to change it. Debating it using actual arguments might. ~Hakinu (talk 13:21, October 1, 2014 (UTC)

you're right
and thanks, hopefully he does get i.p. blocked for good. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 14:00, October 3, 2014 (UTC)

Surprisingly he hasn't been that rude to me lately, and he actually had a good point on the rinnegan topic. Maybe his first warning/block changed his demeanor on this site. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 21:30, October 3, 2014 (UTC)

Rewording
O cool. Thanks man. Sorry for being a smartass haha. I really couldn't tell at first though.  Banan 14  kab  12:20, October 8, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Hey whats up
No worries. It really seemed like you were going to, so I had to make sure there was no edit war. Nothing personal. :P • WindStar7125     18:07, October 8, 2014 (UTC)

Re:New idea
I will look at it tomorrow, okay? Norleon (talk) 23:01, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * I will be happy to! Can you please provide a link? I was searching all over for it, but I could not find it- thanks! --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 01:41, October 10, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Picture request
Hi, I think I uploaded the picture you requested, though I don't know if it's the exact picture you meant.. Still I hope it helps ^_^. Chieko ^_^ (talk) 16:58, October 12, 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I uploaded the image with the Kaguya Clan Patriarch wielding a bone sword :) If there is anything else I can help with please let me know =D! Chieko ^_^ (talk) 11:02, October 14, 2014 (UTC)

Re life force
thanx :]
 * wish someone could teach me how to edit...I mean everything there is to it...I'm too lazy to figure it out myself :D --DARK ZER06 (talk) 12:03, October 13, 2014 (UTC)

thanx again buddy :]

so first of all...what are the MOST important mistakes that I need to avoid in editing an article...what style should I write in... --DARK ZER06 (talk) 15:05, October 13, 2014 (UTC)

ok...in what situations would I get a warning for editing...& also why only Uk, us is invalid? --DARK ZER06 (talk) 15:12, October 13, 2014 (UTC)

appreciate the advices...will come to U if had anything else in mind...thanx again --DARK ZER06 (talk) 15:23, October 13, 2014 (UTC)

yo...how should I sign my edit when editing an article... --DARK ZER06 (talk) 14:03, October 14, 2014 (UTC)

nah I meant the article edits...but then I figured out that I don't need to sign it... --DARK ZER06 (talk) 12:51, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Request
Then give me your reasons. • WindStar7125     18:24, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * I have nothing personal against you, please understand that, but I don't just hand out the rollback flag to anyone that requests it. Have you contributed to the wiki a lot? Yes. You claim that you undo and revert vandalism. I look carefully at your contributions and I don't see too much of that. In fact, I haven't seen you revert vandalism as long as I have been here. You've done a couple of reverts, but only sparingly. Do you give out warning templates to those who violate policies? I haven't seen those actions. Just recently, user ScottUchiha went and removed all content from his page, which is a violation of the talkpage policy. If you claim to know all the rules, why didn't you hand out a warning template to him? Instead of doing so, you commented on his page. And if you claim to know all the rules, how did you not know that your profile page must talk about you as an editor, and how come you got into it with Spey when he requested to delete your page? And also, this is not the first time you have requested rollback status. Like Spey said in that last link, I don't see much reverting of vandalism from you. From your history of contributions, you claim that the edits you revert are vandalism, but they really are not. I don't mean to sound discriminating and to be bringing up your past errors, for we have all made mistakes on this wiki, but you put yourself on the spot when you claimed to "know all the rules." Knowing all the rules is not necessarily a prerequisite to becoming a rollback. If I'm correct, historically, rollbacks have only given rollback status to users that they think are deserving but haven't requested to them. To properly request status, you request a sysop for that, not me. Do I have the ability to give rollback status? Yes. Have I done so before? Yes. But that user (who was FF-Suzaku), didn't request to do so, is a translator and was a candidate to be a sysop, before he claimed he had no interest. Also, it is poor reasoning to ask for a flag "because [you] personally believe [you] deserve some type of promotion." Koto Senju humbly asked Ten-Tailed Fox in the last link I just gave, and didn't boldly proclaim he felt he deserved it. He also brought up an example of a user that has vandalized and he had dealt with, rather than merely claiming he reverted vandalism. Again, nothing personal against you, but I don't hand out the flag willy-nilly from requests. You must request a sysop. I never requested to be a rollback, but I did the edits necessary and it happened for me. I don't mean to be your harshest critic, and I understand there are users who are questionably rollbacks, but I can't give the flag out like free cheese. Does this mean you are an unworthy contributor? No. Not at all. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 02:38, October 14, 2014 (UTC)