User talk:GokūBlack10

Re: Wood Release?
I was quite content to ignore it, but I'll skin over the discussion and give my two cents.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 11:43, August 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * That's fine. I can wait a day. On the issue on the Wood Release topic, my point can stand.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 12:38, August 21, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Wood Release
Done~ --Cerez 365 ™(talk) 06:19, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

If you could
Because youre one of the main editors on the issue, would you mind taking a look at the forum page i created: Origin of the Chakra Receivers. Thank You. KotoSenju (OldUser:JaZZBaND)-Talk-Contributions 19:36, August 24, 2013 (UTC)

I'm kinda right on the scale of the combined Bijudama from Naruto and Bee.
Its not wrong at all.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 03:51, August 26, 2013 (UTC)

stupid **** or what is his/her name
You are okay with that person inserting false information into articles?--Elveonora (talk) 22:21, August 29, 2013 (UTC)

The current edit is okay. The intent behind it wasn't and the other edit wasn't wrong just more specific on which he/she disagrees/ed with--Elveonora (talk) 22:45, August 29, 2013 (UTC)

Elveonora insulted me on my talkpage.
During our debate, he/she called me 'stupid and ignorant' as well as a 'dumb ass'.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 22:32, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Apparently he insulted me on Cerez's talk page too.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 22:39, August 29, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Translation Request
He thinks "These stakes bind what they directly touch. A binding that is by far stronger than the power of Pain Nagato's Outer Path.". Seelentau 愛議 22:49, August 30, 2013 (UTC)

Fuen's Barrier Technique
The hand sign list is technically wrong because several hand signs are used out of camera so the hand signs list on the technique page doesn't show the full list of signs used. --Speysider Talk Page 00:09, August 31, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Copied Content
If a wiki is copying our content without any attribution linking back to us, we leave them a warning. If that does nothing after 24-48 hours, we just notify Wikia Staff who'll close the duplicate wiki. It isn't the first time that this wiki has been copied word for word ;) --Speysider Talk Page 09:30, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

Fan Levation
Why did you delete this? I couldn't find a reason in the deletion log. (Evilpuppy (talk) 21:05, September 1, 2013 (UTC))

Stolen Content
Hello. I would like to report some plagiarism I've seen of a person from a Bleach Fanfiction site. This is the character: http://thebleachfanon.wikia.com/wiki/Van_Satonaka

In particular, the stolen content is all in the Powers & Abilities Section and I've taken the liberty of noting below all infractions I could locate myself.


 * Kizuimōka - Stolen from Sasuke's Amaterasu Blaze Release shield.
 * Byakko no Gōon - Stolen from Might Guy's Daytime Tiger.
 * Suzaku Hayate - Again, from Might Guy. But the Morning Peacock technique.
 * Kakumei Nukite - Stolen from Narutopedia's article about the Third Raikage's "Invincible Spear" Nukite technique.
 * Seisenren - Stolen completely from the Second Mizukage's Steaming Murder technique, totally word-for-word plagiarism.

Thank you for paying heed to this situation, I appreciate it. --Kōetsuji Akisame Shishō (talk) 01:45, September 2, 2013 (UTC)

We did see that.
The previous chapter Obito wiped out everything in the barrier. Including Madara and Hashirama. But since an Edo Tensei's body rapidly regenerates after being obliterated, they regenerated quickly. Unless you believe both of them could survive four Ten-Tails Bijudama going off at once?--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 01:38, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Except I'm trying to prevent people from not hyping it up, Ten-Tailed Fox.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 01:55, September 5, 2013 (UTC)

Check page
Check page 08 of chapter 645, the Kurama Avatar Naruto sports now has rings around its eyes after he entered Sage Mode. Depending on where you read, you'll have to skip 'pages' 1 and 2 or 3 and 4 due to them being fanart.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 21:59, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

Checked it myself, its definitely there. MangekyoSasuke (talk) 00:34, September 9, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, suddenly...
The Ten-Tails isn't a tailed beast, while I brought this many times in the past, I was told to **** off. I just wonder how this works, not nice... feels great getting ignored for sure--Elveonora (talk) 22:09, September 11, 2013 (UTC)

Except its skin has had woodish texture since day one of brown color and flowers grew on it down the line. It wasn't even that much about what it is but more of what it wasn't, by definition it couldn't be a tailed beast, yet you see, it stayed that way until recently despite more or less nothing new having been revealed. Same for its godhood, Kurama told us it's a god and you needed it to be stated twice in order to be true. Still, this wouldn't be the first time that this happened. I say something and it ether meets disagreement or gets completely ignored, then later another person comes with the same thing and suddenly it's true. But peace :-I--Elveonora (talk) 11:58, September 12, 2013 (UTC)

Images
I really don't know why people keep swapping out 1080p images which are anime renditions of the original manga depiction. It's getting rather irritating tbh. --Speysider Talk Page 21:14, September 12, 2013 (UTC)


 * I know right ? It's stupid. OVA < Anime < Manga. OVA have never taken precedence over the manga at all, neither have they taken precedence over anime depictions of manga events. I posted about this on the image policy talkpage if you want to chime in: clicky here --Speysider Talk Page 21:36, September 12, 2013 (UTC)


 * What's your thoughts on using images from episode previews ? Unless I'm much mistaken, Narutopedia has always deleted such images and not permitted their use. --Speysider Talk Page 11:30, September 14, 2013 (UTC)


 * Relevant.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 11:44, September 14, 2013 (UTC)

Tailed Beast Intelligence
Regarding the thing with Deidara and the Tailed Beast, what do we do then concerning the Tailed Beast article where it is stated that it is proven false that the tailed beasts are not intelligent enough by themselves to use their powers effectively? The Shinju article and the Tailed Beast article are thus in conflict with each other. The Shinju article is stating the tailed beast intelligence issue as a fact, while the tailed beast article states it as a belief that is false, as the tailed beasts show to have intelligence outside of their hosts. I would suggest changing the sentence in the Shinju article to reflect the tailed beast article in that sense, or just not mention it at all. --Popopoyotl (talk) 02:51, September 17, 2013 (UTC)