Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-142748-20141231093731/@comment-142748-20150102005437

1. Then why did no one collaborate on Obito's account? Heck why did Kakashi even want to investigate to see if it was true to confirm Obito's account? When the author purposely doesn't go into one claim...what does that say about it?

2. Itachi's flashbacks were of him in the ANBU, not five years old. He would have seen and experienced any discrimination or segregation, wouldn't he? Yet the manga put the blame for what happened to the Uchiha...solely on the Uchiha. Shisui and Itachi never, ever mentioned 'And now the Uchiha have a curfew' or 'Despite loving the village, our own clan is suffering'. Not even a handwave. And Sasuke, at 7, would still have seen his Clan being treated differently wouldn't they Snapper?

3. Since a villain said it. One which lied straight to Sasuke's face about not being involved with the Kurama attack on Konoha. If say Hiruzen said it, it wouldn't be in question. But Obito, who lied to Sasuke's face...why wouldn't he lie to Sasuke to get him on his side about the Uchiha's motives?

4. People who are forcibly relocated aren't usually given already built buildings. They are forced to live on new ground. The Uchiha had no evidence of that.

5. So...ignoring that Obito did outright lie to Sasuke about not being involved in the Kurama attack? If he lied about that, why wouldn't he lie about the Uchiha's treatment? Heck, when Sasuke turned to his side...he got a VERY happy smirk. From Obito's reactions, the fact he did in fact lie to Sasuke, and the lack of collaboration, its apparent Obito lied about the discrimination and segregation.

6. Since an author's job is 'Show, don't Tell'. If Kishimoto never showed it, it should be taken with a grain of salt.

7. But the lack of collaboration from a villain's account points to it not being true, and the fact Obito lied to Sasuke on why Kurama attacked Konoha shows we shouldn't trust his account.