Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-45510280-20200416210937/@comment-6769189-20200419235151

Ninja Of War wrote:

Like I said before, I explained my reasoning, yet you don't acknowledge/address that or any of the specific points I made. Nice dodge. I didnt dodge anything. You have a belief about canonicity and the wiki agrees with you so you tell others what metrics to judge information by

Ninja Of War wrote:

That was my point as well, as the novel statement from Akatsuki:Hiden is not in conflict, but the Tsukuyomi usage on Izumi is in conflict with the anime. No, the sad part is that a wiki policy bothers you. And when I say my take on it, it bothers you even more. The novel is the source material. Hasnt the source material always been considered the canon?

Ninja Of War wrote:

Well, so much for your concern of the "novels being canon". Guess that stance fell just as quickly as your decorum. Because i dont add information to the wiki my stance on what is canon is invalid?? Horrible fallacy

Ninja Of War wrote:

In summary, I tried to engage with you, that didn't work out. Although, I do wonder if you actually could understand my points or not. Anyways, peace out. I wonder if you understand your hypocrisy