Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20150527125159/@comment-1251315-20150527150003

Seelentau wrote: Sure, removing a shitload of work done by a single user because another single user (= you) seemingly deems the work unnecessary is totally the spirit of the wiki. Seelentau wrote: See? Go ahead and do that. Removing the results of hard work is never an option, as long as those resutls are valid. Don't take me out of context again. That was one of the proposals to solve the issue, that wasn't the "only solution" being presented. It's up to the community to decide how to proceed with this issue that I have identified.

Once again again, I will say it: editors contribute here on the notion that anyone can remove it for any or no reason. Shakhmoot's edits do not get immunity from this policy, and I expect you -- a sysop -- to uphold that policy in future, instead of determining that user contributions can simply be given immunity from a well established wiki ideaology.

You will not change that in this thread: or are you now suggesting that any contributions can stay and get immunity (including vandalism)?

If Shakhmoot does not want his edits touched, he should not contribute them here. Every other editor accepts this, except you. Stop acting like Shakhmoot gets a free pass from an established policy.