Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-36019309-20190114073523/@comment-35409024-20190214080334

Jason wrote: There you just confirmed that i'm correct. Your previous argument has that the cast of tsukuyomi is done instantly (0 seconds), from your statement above that doesn't seem to be the case, which makes it clear that Kakashi in shippuden wasn't talking about the cast speed of tsukuyomi as you had suggested ''' Actually, it proves you wrong. There is no intervening time or space that transpires according to what I said. "The second the adversary is exposed to Mangekyou Sharingan, a strange realm-" Not after the second. Not before the second. THE SECOND. What time transpires if it happens on the second? Or the minute? Or the millisecond? Or anything else? Nada because the illusion happens on the second, or minute, or millisecond, or whatever you want to call a moment. There is no time that takes place between looking into Itachi's eyes and the illusion taking place. It doesn't say The second the adversary is exposed to mangekyo sharingan then a another second happens and the illusion takes place. Lol, GG. Now with that down, what else would shippuden Kakashi be talking about if it wasn't about Tsukuyomi's cast speed? ohh it's the speed the just lasts at. More spouting without proof. No need to even comment on fan theories since you already proved yourself wrong since your evidence from earlier shows time happens in between the start of the illusion and the end of the illusion. Like i said, you lose until your headcanon stuff becomes real. You're playing a wise guy by saying that you're not claiming that BEE can break genjutsu on his own, but take a good look at your comments.
 * reminder of our argument
 * your statement on the word MOMENT

I am claiming that Bee can't break genjutsu on his owm but since you're not agreeing and saying otherwise then that obviously means that you're claiming the opposite.The very fact that you're arguing with me right now on the opposite of what my argument has, means that you're making a claim. Now i ask of you to prove your claim, you would obviously fail to do so, because of lack of information..i mean, because of NO information. Because your claim is headcanon material. Orrr if i'm wrong you can always drown me with proof, facts. I'm still laughing cause you want to argue over me not saying Bee is exactly the same as he was over ten years prior. People these days. Anyways, except for one little thing. I never made the claim he can. If I have, prove it by quoting me. All I've said is you have no proof he hasn't improved. And so far, you have given none. So I win and you actually lose since you have no proof and my claim was that you don't have proof of Bee being the same as he was, which you have proven by not giving proof. You're the only one with an actual claim that so far hasn't been proven. So GG. Oh btw, telling someone to prove their claims when you can't do the same, is hypocritical. Try giving evidence before using that tactic and it might just be viable.