Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-3279282-20171016184901/@comment-2112031-20171020202456

Seelentau wrote: You're arguing that because Raiga's alleged appearance in the manga doesn't contradict anything, it's canon. Or not? If not, why bring it up in the last paragraph? I brought it up because you argued that Raiga's (unnamed) appearance in the Manga could hypothetically mean that it was not actually him. I replied that the reason Pakura was not in The Will of Fire was because her established backstory contradicts what happens to the kunoichi in the movie.

My only remark regarding canonicity was a rather general statement that anime-canon basically amounts to "as canon as any given fan wants it to be". That's all I've said on the subject.

I apologize for causing any confusion.