User talk:SeaTerror

Hello SeaTerror, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Raiga Kurosuki page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Snapper2 (Talk) 19:38, April 2, 2010

Raiga
Please stop changing his page, if you have a problem ask an admin.--Deva 27 (talk) 21:16, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Revert wars are not helping the wiki. Since the filler arc based the character on a manga character, and we cover all the Naruto world, it can stay. Jacce | Talk 08:10, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Just because they are not canon, doesn't mean the creators of the anime take inspiration from the manga. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:58, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

So... should we delete everything that just happens in the anime? Jacce | Talk | Contributions 09:33, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

We don't say that they are canon. Only that an anime filler character was based on a manga character. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 18:55, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

The infobox says that he was an anime only character. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:41, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Just to show that the filler character shared some traits with the canon character, since both was a part of the same group (according to the anime). Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:08, May 8, 2010 (UTC)

Since we have an article about him, we have to add info about him, and since the anime decided to add a member of the seven swords that hasn't been seen in the manga, we still have to write that he was a member. And to write that he shared some traits was a manga member just shows how the anime director created him. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:17, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Then why did they share some traits. Besides, they are listed under the trivia section, just some fun/interesting notice. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:21, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

He exists in the anime. Whether he shares some traits with a manga character or not doesn't change that. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:18, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

What difference does it make? Jacce | Talk | Contributions 16:48, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

twin lion fist edit
your edit made no sensible grammatical contribution whatsoever. Instead of the information flowing you chopped it up. It's one description --Cerez365 (talk) 19:53, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Canon Information
Once again...the wiki covers both canon and non canon information. Removing the anime information from the Ko's article means you'd have to do the same for all the articles which is ridiculous. This is why the distinction of it being anime only information was made. So please stop causing unnecessary work for us. --Cerez365 (talk) 18:39, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

You are stating it MIGHT be canon by stating that he MIGHT be from the main branch because of having no curse seal. If something is shown in the anime then that means it is not canon unless the manga or a databook says otherwise. SeaTerror (talk) 18:42, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have a perfect understanding of what the word 'canon' means as it pertains to information. You however fail to understand what the inclusion of both anime and manga information is. If you can find a better way to rephrase the statement then be my guest however, it's not going to be removed.--Cerez365 (talk) 18:48, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Canon never refers to false information.

Official dictionary definition: "The works of an author that have been accepted as authentic: There are 37 plays in the Shakespeare canon. Compare apocrypha ( def. 3 )"

Urbandictionary: "A piece of work -usually in reference to literature- that was written by the original author. Spin-offs, fan fiction, and any work not written by the original author of that fictional universe is considered non-canon. I got sad at the end of Rurouni Kenshin: Seisouhen. Good thing it took out a lot of chunks from the original plot and wasn't written by Nobuhiro Watsuki, or else it would have been considered canon. :D 19:00, December 21, 2010 (UTC)SeaTerror (talk) Oh my GOD that Naruto fan fiction SUCKED! Thank God it wasn't canon."

Also I had the perfect solution for that and was about to edit the page to reflect it before it was locked. If it won't be removed completely then "In the anime where his back story is expanded, he is shown without a curse mark."

That is the best solution to make it neutral. SeaTerror (talk) 19:00, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Once again, "I have a perfect understanding of what the word 'canon' means" You however, need to understand that we deal with canon and non-canon information. If you'd thought of a compromise before instead of vandalizing the page it wouldn't have been locked.--Cerez365 (talk) 19:06, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

I forgot to comment before but you obviously don't know what vandalism is. SeaTerror (talk) 16:57, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Seven Swordsmen Infobox
Most of our infoboxes are set to have info automatically added to them by collecting data from other infoboxes. For example, Rasengan is a move used by five people: Minato, Jiraiya, Kakashi, Naruto and Konohamaru. By filling them in the Rasengan infobox, the five character infoboxes will add the technique to their jutsu lists. Same happens with teams, the only one actually requiring to be added to the infobox is the team leader, when there is one. I understand your concern for putting anime-only tags, but due to the nature of the templates, I don't know how to do that, or if it is possible, considering their current coding. Ask Simant, he's the one who maintains our infobox codes. Something similar to what you want is already done for anime-only jutsu, so porting that feature to another infobox maybe possible. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 17:53, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * It has been done for a few days. S im A nt 00:07, January 11, 2011 (UTC)