Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-30323490-20181122205633/@comment-35409024-20181129074256

LaughingLyon wrote:

Rasengan > Chidori this is literally spoonfed to us by Kishimoto you trying to lol your way out of this shows how dishonest you’re trying to be but even if we take Rasengan off the table Boruto can use Shinden and that’s confirmed better than Raikiri so either way you lose.

Like I said in the beginning, comparing a Rasengan to Chidori is like comparing a bullet to a grenade. Even though a Grenade does far more damage than a bullet, it's been shown on myth busters that you can survive a grenade even behind a wooden table. Can't say the same for a bullet. You need to learn the difference between piercing and explosive and other damages. Just because a piercing attack can pierce through doesn't mean an explosive one can explode through. I shouldn't have to explain this to anyone, it should be common sense and there's nothing dishonest about that kiddo.

LaughingLyon wrote:

Gaara was oneshot by a inferior attack to what Boruto can hit him with so if Boruto lands it he wins.

?

LaughingLyon wrote:

Prove that Gaara’s sand will react to something both a. Rinnegan and Byakugan couldn’t even perceive

So basically you are saying the sand has eyes, why else would you compare it to an eye technique? Someone is clearly living in fairytale land. It's said that the sand will protect Gaara from all dangers. So what do I need to prove when i'm not the one making the claim the Vanishing Rasengan will bypass a sand said to protect against all dangers and by it's own accord? To the sand, it's just another technique. Going invisible does nothing for something that doesn't have eyes, that's a pretty ignorant rebuttal. The sand couldn't see to begin with, so what changes that allows it to go through?