Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-7292165-20141211192509/@comment-28861328-20141216231157

Sarutobii2 wrote: Its not like we're ignoring the official arc names. The lead paragraph to those arcs already mention them.

I'll keep that in mind the next time an unnamed technique is given a name. I genuinely like some of ours better, so we'll just keep them, make up our own Kanji for them, and then "mention" the official name.

Rachin wrote: @TTF you should be the last one talking about being sarcastic and volatile. And I can be yes. And I know a majority voted for official but last time I checked was "filler arcs" anywhere in there? Nope. So don't majority me. I could care leas if Supreme and Snapper, no offense said so. And stop making it seem like the supporting had us beat by 100s of votes. Your number was just basically doubled ours. The support did blow us out the window.

@Duel No no. Because it's not canon it shouldn't be allowed. No Non-Canon material on this site because its a wannabe official site and everything has to be perfect.

While we are at it take away all the theories we made despite some evidence because it wasn't said nor printed by officials. Come on guys lets do this.

...now that's sarcasm.

I'm going to dumb this down for you as low as I possibly can:

We're changing them to the official names. Got it? Good. And if, at some point, you'd like to jump in and help, you can, or you can just sit right there and watch our taillights fade away into the distance. How's that for clear?