Board Thread:Narutopedia Collaboration/@comment-17623-20140206165340/@comment-28861328-20140606231435

Seelentau wrote: What if we're interpreting those clues in the wrong way? Drawing a conclusion that's logical to us doesn't make it logical to the rest of the visitors.

Interpretation and logic are contradictory words.

Logic implies that there is a series of credible clues, which, I might add, all literature have in them as context clues are kinda a big thing if you're going to write anything substantial, thus leading to a reasonable conclusion.

I'm fine with adding those to articles, because that is what normal, alert, and reasonable readers do.

Interpretation, on the other hand, is one user's idea of what something might mean. There are usually little to no clues involved and the conclusion that results is sketchy at best. For example, using what Ultimate said, the theory that "somehow" Son Goku and Roshi have the exact same kekkei genkai, but Roshi's isn't at all tied to Son Goku (because that totally makes logical sense), but Naruto preforming the exact same feat is obviously entirely different and therefore Roshi should be listed and Naruto shouldn't.

Now, anyone with two brain cells and a thought would look at that theory and immediately laugh it off as ludicrous fanfiction.

However, on the other hand, Kaguya's third eye is never called a Rinnegan. In fact, quite to the contrary, it was called a Sharingan (Yes, "power of the Sharingan" means Sharingan and if you don't agree with that, then I have no words for you). On the other hand, Madara's Infinite Tsukuyomi was said to be cast with a Rinnegan, and we know he did so with this third eye. Therefore, logically, the third eye is a Rinnegan. Kaguya had it. She cast Infinite Tsukuyomi. So, logically, we can come to the sound conclusion that she also possesses the Rinnegan.

See how that works?