Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4522253-20181001230600/@comment-4271790-20181016190310

FishTank wrote: It's been a couple weeks, and I feel like there's an agreement in principle that I can continue putting up some more drafts for testing, so long as they're feature-complete. In that respect, have you found any SMW issues with the Drafts, WindStar? Yes, I have. The proposed draft infobox for Tools removes the slideshow in the infobox. Ideally we'd like to keep those in the infoboxes that use slideshows along with maintaining tabbers in infoboxes that use them (such as character infoboxes). Not to mention in the draft, the "Name" sub-infobox listing the different names of the subject looks different from the current infoboxes, particularly the lack of appearance of the words "Kanji", "Rōmaji" and "Alternative names" in their respective parameters. I would think we'd like those to be formatted the same way you format the "Literal English" and "English anime" parameters in your draft for Tools. FishTank wrote: Also, I'm reluctant to wait on UltimateSupreme to move forward (even if moving forward is in baby steps). His editing is fairly sporadic for the last year, and so I'd like to see other opinions as well. Perhaps this sort of change can help simplify things for the less technically-oriented. I was aware that UltimateSupreme is busy and may not give a timely response, so my contingency plan for that from the beginning was to contact Dantman by email. Though UltimateSupreme did test the draft on a page here so I presumed he'd have responded by now. So I'll get Dantman, as he usually appears when he's contacted by email. Both of them have a more in-depth understanding of the infoboxes than I do. Even if I agree to them being implemented here given everything goes smoothly, either one of them can ensure that everything works more proficiently than I.