Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-34115-20150626061048/@comment-25227224-20150627054605

@Dantman : Although, we’ve had our petty squabble in the past — I’ll state that there is no biases that will be shifting my position. The solution is that his actions call for the removal of his moderator role. On one hand we cannot deteriorate the accomplishment and contributions that he’s given to the wiki. But more importantly — we cannot underplay the blatant irresponsibility he’s shown with the privileges of having power above others in the community. Especially when it comes to having a responsibility of constructing order — whilst causing more strife with his conflicts, instigating with what would be deemed as ‘flame-wars’ ‘trolling’ on other normal users.

There is a sense of non-accountability in the community. Having a position such as moderator with the given tools calls for such moderator to be more of a pacifist; which require that the moderator to not toss personal attacks, epithets that clearly antagonize or demean the community’s users — prolonging the instigation of petty arguments. The moderator also is supposed to be a peace officer to some regards where persons must leave their ego that leads to grandiose abuse of power. The issue, isn’t the ‘solution’ rather it’s — the repercussion.

Lastly; the issue comes down to whether he should hold the role as moderator based on his actions, and if he’s ‘fit’ to which with what I stated I would say he is unqualified and unprincipled for the role as moderator — NWG