Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-26320097-20150423120614/@comment-24357950-20150627203210

KaizerBlazeX wrote: It's not cancelling each other out. It's just a matter of perspective. The daughter starts doubting her mother, then she finds out that she wasn't her real mother. Then learns that love is what's important. After that she will find out that it was a mistake but learned something great due to that mistake and gains confidence in herself and strengthen their family relationship through that lesson, which is "love is what's important" like what Naruto said, now even if Sasuke or Sakura is away, she would not doubt the bonds of her family. You should have been used to it by now since there were a lot of plot twists at the first one and on shippuuden. Not to mention it was pretty dramatic. Naruto experienced something more emotional so this time, I don't get the feels like I did from the previous one. How is that not a cancelled out twist? It's like coming to terms with someone's death and that person ends up being revived. It ruins the point and the message, and I don't see why Kishimoto would even consider doing this. That would be beyond awful writing. I don't know a single author who ruins his own message like that. In the end they'll be exactly where they were in the beginning and the story will be pointless. They'd be richer in experiences, but a story is about moving on. There were a lot of plot twists yes, but Karin being the mother was the plot twist. There can't be a twist to a twist. "Sakura is the biological mother. No she isn't. Nevermind she is". That is not a twist. And Kishimoto never used any stylistic method like. No author I know of did. "Sakura is the mother. No it's Karin. No it's Temari" would be a twist. But going back to how it was right after accepting how it is? How can this sound plausible to anyone?