User talk:NinjaSheik

Re: Thanks
Always a pleasure. ^_^ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:17, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Also a pleasure. ~_^ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:45, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

As always ^. ^_~ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:05, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Sure is. But I'm here to help. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:10, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Suggest
Hi! Can I suggest to archive your talk page? It's getting kinda long. ^__^ --Ilnarutoanime 19:24, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oops... my bad. What I mean is you want to archive your talk page, I just typed it wrong, I think. --Ilnarutoanime 19:32, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * This might help. Help:Archiving. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:37, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * You know archiving is very easy. --Ilnarutoanime 19:39, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, yes. I know, but wikis differ from each other. I know how to archive and create a page for it, but I'm pretty sure the Narutopedia's way is different from the KH-Wiki's way.-- Ninja Sheik  19:43, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you need a hand? Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:52, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * YES, PLEASE! I don't know what the heck I'm doing! Believe it!-- Ninja Sheik  19:54, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * When you click the something button at the right of the "leave message" button, click the archive. --Ilnarutoanime 19:55, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * ...Huh? This is confusing, I wish this could be as simple back on the KH-Wiki....-- Ninja Sheik  19:57, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * What I mean is this. --Ilnarutoanime 20:02, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oooh... That looks like the format for the new wiki skin, I'm using the Monobook skin.-- Ninja Sheik  20:03, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oops... wait, This is it.. --Ilnarutoanime 20:10, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Then it's top right you'll see "archive" hit that and then click "select all" "save archive" and you're good.--Cerez365™ Hyūga Symbol.svg 20:12, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I used that skin when I went back to my country. But the new skin is more accurate to use.--Ilnarutoanime 20:15, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ooh... I see! Okay, thanks, Ilnarutoanime-san, Cerez-senpai!-- Ninja Sheik  20:16, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * @Cerez365: At least until you reach number 10. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:17, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, NinjaSheik! Since we are the only girls here, lol! I'm glad to help. --Ilnarutoanime 20:19, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * ^__^-- Ninja Sheik  20:27, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Big problem !
You mixed the first and second kazekage up, they need to be fixed.

Read. The. Trivia. Down at the bottom.-- Ninja Sheik  23:06, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Shippuden Home
Hey, Helen. You don't to know me or become a friend, I just wanna say that I created a site for Naruto. I would like Naruto Fans to join it so that's why I sent you this messege. The address of the site is: http://shippudenhome.webs.com.

All right, but no thanks. I'm not interested in joining any website.-- Ninja Sheik  18:02, June 27, 2011 (UTC) <!--Yo.. O:< Why are you reverting my edits on the Madara Uchiha article? PitfulRevenge (talk) 16:18, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

It's not supposed to be there. You're not even putting in a good place! You're putting in the translation and that's not right.-- Ninja Sheik  16:20, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

Don't be stupid, okay? Instead of reverting, solve it with discussion and working things out even before reverting people's edits. If there's any disagreements, is it better for everyone to meet and work things out, is that also part of the community or is that an admin's decision? PitfulRevenge (talk) 16:27, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

I'm stupid? You're the idiot, Madara is the not the MAIN villain in Naruto. He's only ONE of them.-- Ninja Sheik  16:29, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, shut the fuck up. Yes he is the main anatagonist, he is responsible for the Nine Tail's attack on the Hidden Leaf Village, also responsible for why the Akatsuki took a more active role in Part II. I know he is one of the villians, but he is the MAIN antagonist. So grow the fuck up, you bastard. PitfulRevenge (talk) 16:33, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

You little brat! You're such a jerk! Don't get angry because everyone, not just me, reverted your edit and you don't like it! You're acting like a spoiled brat! So maybe it's YOU who needs to grow up!-- Ninja Sheik  16:36, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

You lousy bastard, read my previous edits and understand my theories and intentions. I'm not little, I'm 14-15 years old, so you need to shut the fuck up, this is reality, not your own fantasy world. Your the little brat...don't start shit with me.PitfulRevenge (talk) 16:41, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

I'm 16, you ding-dong! And here, let me give you a little piece of advice: NARUTOPEDIA DOESN'T ALLOW SPECULATION~! Such things as "theories" are not actual proof, they're not factual! And you're the one in the fantasy world! I know that other users told you the same thing I did, but you're freakin' stubborn you won't listen to anyone but yourself!-- Ninja Sheik  16:43, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

Then why the fuck didn't you say that earlier than? That means your the DING-DONG! Is your dick on fire or what? Even if you did reverted my edits, I did say to give reasons of my edits on the Madara Uchiha article were false, but you had to reverted them and didn't say shit, right? So quiet your damn mouth. PitfulRevenge (talk) 21:05, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

First of all, I'M A GIRL! Secondly, you are such a freakin' BASTARD! You're so arrogant and stubborn, you're such a spoiled brat! Everyone gave their reasons to you, I know they did! I saw your talkpage, even then you refused to listen! How about you quit running you damn mouth instead!?!-- Ninja Sheik  21:43, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

Just wanted to say, I don't generally throw insults, but that guy was an asshole -.- ZPRN (talk) 20:26, July 7, 2011 (UTC)

Indeed! You don't know the half of it!-- Ninja Sheik  20:30, July 7, 2011 (UTC)-->

Re: PitifulRevenge
You should talk to these users. They can block him on all wikis. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:42, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, but he'll target me and this wiki when he comes back. Have you consider blocking him for good?-- Ninja Sheik  03:44, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

If they don't do it, and he causes more problem here, I will stop him for good. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:47, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, but we won't stop chasing me. He told me that on my old KH Wiki account before I asked a friend to block him. He thinks he can get to me, but I have connections everywhere.-- Ninja Sheik  03:52, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Which is why you should talk to the Spam taskforce, a few clicks and he will never edit another wiki again. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:55, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, but I'm worried he may get to me elsewhere besides wiki. Anyway, thanks, Jacce-senpai-- Ninja Sheik  03:57, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

I don't mean to eavesdrop, but if you're concerned about him annoying you elsewhere, it might be an idea to remove the link to you Fanfiction.net page and other prsonal info from your profile. --Hawkeye2701 (talk) 04:18, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

I know, Hwakeye-san. I'm not worried. I can ban user from my Fanfiction account, so I'm not worried. But speaking of that brat, he's still spying on me. Look at this. Way at the bottom. He does realize I don't care about the account I have on the Danny Phantom wiki, right? That place is a totally dump, practically abandon. He could leave messages there all he want, but I wouldn't care.-- Ninja Sheik  15:57, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Conflicts
When a user begins acting uncivil and cursing, don't respond, instead take it to an admin. :) S im A nt 20:38, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, sir. Sorry for the trouble.-- Ninja Sheik  21:07, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Shikamaru article
That's a shame, I liked my small contribution to Shikamaru's profile.--

Sorry, but it seems kinda...redundant.-- Ninja Sheik  22:08, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

How very far-sighted of you.--Jiraiya21

Is that an insult? I'm just saying, how Shikamaru dealt with Hidan was impressive, but it doesn't really need to be mention under his Abilities, does it? We all know he's a genius.-- Ninja Sheik  22:15, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Thanks
No problem (^_~)V I don't know what his problem is.Cerez365™ 03:23, July 11, 2011 (UTC)

I know, right? All because I reverted his edit on Madara's page, he acts like I was the only we did it. Just a spoiled, foul-mouthed brat that whines because he didn't get his way.-- Ninja Sheik  03:25, July 11, 2011 (UTC)

Kumo flak jacket
Why did you erase the flak jacket idea I had it seemed fine to me and it would help people find information a lot easier. I understand the scorch incident but don't understand this--Black-Light (talk) 19:58, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

We have a page for it already on the wiki. Plus, I also reverted because you took out the Category: Villages.-- Ninja Sheik  21:12, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

Hello Again!
Hi, Ninja! How are you? I have a question about Naruto Shippūden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Generations. Since I believe the director of the game said all characters will be playable in it, can we use the other Jinchūriki and the Sound Five? I really have become a big fan of Naruto again so I'd love to know! I heard even Obito is playable which I found interesting. 01:24, August 8, 2011 (UTC)

I wouldn't know. I don't play the games.-- Ninja Sheik  01:25, August 8, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, okay. Oh sorry I just realised my signature is off, because I didn't put one up on here. Thanks for at least answering, I appreciate it! Marexl

It's okay. And no problem.-- Ninja Sheik  01:32, August 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Block
Has the problem been solved? Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:49, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, it's been resolved. Thanks, Jacce-senapi!-- Ninja Sheik  16:24, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

WTH is your problem? Just leave it as it is!--

No! It's already stated on his article!-- Ninja Sheik  02:06, August 20, 2011 (UTC)

Zetsu
I know someway somehow I'm probably wrong, but tell me, why did you put "clone"?--Daren968615177 (talk) 20:55, September 3, 2011 (UTC)Daren968615177

Because it is a clone.-- Ninja Sheik  20:55, September 3, 2011 (UTC) Well then, you're contradicting yourself. It says, "The original Zetsu was left at the headquarters to keep an eye on Sasuke while he's recovering in order to prevent Kabuto from capturing him during the war." But then it says Sasuke impales a "clone". It wouldn't make sense for there to be both the original and a clone guarding Sasuke. Besides, didn't you see the way he reacted? That's not the reaction of a clone. That's the reaction of the original White Zetsu surprised by Sasuke's betrayal. Unless of course, I'm missing something.--Daren968615177 (talk) 21:02, September 3, 2011 (UTC)Daren968615177

Yes, you are missing something. If that was the real White Zetsu, where is his Venus flytrap, then?-- Ninja Sheik  21:19, September 3, 2011 (UTC)

His venus flytrap is not visible, whereas his reaction is legitimate. As I said before, it'd be pretty stupid for Madara to have a clone watch Sasuke and for that clone to react in such a manner. That is, unless Kishimoto has an ulterior motive. Very well, time will tell whether or not it's the real one.--Daren968615177 (talk) 00:50, September 4, 2011 (UTC)Daren968615177

If you looked at the discussion before coming to me, you will see it isn't a clone.-- Ninja Sheik  00:53, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

If you're referring to the discussion between Sasuke and Zetsu, I have looked at it. As a matter of fact, one of the reasons I took so long to answer back was because I was looking for the discussion. Look, either it's a clone or it's not. End of story.--Daren968615177 (talk)

I meant the discussion page on Zetsu's page, way at the bottom. It's a clone.-- Ninja Sheik  01:42, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

The "original Zetsu" was not the real Zetsu as the person who posted the pictures on the discussion page implies. As we later saw, Zetsu had used the spore technique to trick everyone into believing the Raikage killed him. Zetsu has proven to be able to make copies with or without the flytraps. The fact of the matter is we don't have a full grasp of Zetsu's abilities, so to say it's a clone just because there's no flytrap is not enough. One should always be open minded and consider other scenarios.--Daren968615177 (talk) 03:23, September 4, 2011 (UTC)Daren968615177

Take that up with them, not me. Why I'm even having this conversation with you guys is beyond me. I was following orders, nothing more and nothing less. Go to Zetsu's page to rest up your case, not here.-- Ninja Sheik  03:15, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Haha, well why didn't you say you were following orders as soon as I sent you the message? Fair enough. I won't pursue this matter. My objective was to show whoever added "clone" that it might in fact be the original Zetsu. Sorry to have bothered you.--Daren968615177 (talk) 03:38, September 4, 2011 (UTC)Daren968615177

Yeah, whatever. I was never the one to added clone, sheesh. I just reverted an edit made by a anonymous user, that's all.-- Ninja Sheik  03:42, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry to butt in here, but while we must be conscious of other scenarios it's a simple thing as the original White Zetsu has never been see without the flytrap appendages, now if a clone is see with it that still doesn't make the initial statement untrue. If and when it is revealed that it was or wan't a clone the information will be changed accordingly, but from what we've seen we cannot say it was White Zetsu. He could've left a clone to watch Sasuke as a precaution for himself or something else could have happened.--Cerez365™ 03:52, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

I understand what you mean, but think about it..of all the White Zetsu clones that have been surprised/killed since this war began( two of them by Raikage and Sakura), they've managed to keep their composure. The Zetsu Sasuke attacked reacted like someone scared for their lives. From what I've seen so far, a Zetsu clone would be more surprised, less frightened. Besides, what would be the point of displaying Sasuke's newfound power on a clone? But as I said earlier, perhaps Kishimoto has an ulterior motive.--Daren968615177 (talk) 04:19, September 4, 2011 (UTC)Daren968615177

Hey, you guys! Don't talk to each other though my talkpage! I'm going to bed, so move the talk to your talkpages instead! Good night.-- Ninja Sheik  04:21, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Beyblade Wiki
If you're online, come to the Beyblade wiki and log in as NinjaSheik. Do it as soon as you read this.Amaterasu789 (talk) 23:52, September 16, 2011 (UTC)

Why?-- Ninja Sheik  23:55, September 16, 2011 (UTC)

Follow my lead, please.Amaterasu789 (talk) 23:57, September 16, 2011 (UTC)

Give me a reason to.-- Ninja Sheik  23:59, September 16, 2011 (UTC)

VERY important stuff and I was told to bring someone with me. Follow my lead, please. Amaterasu789 (talk) 00:01, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

Please, hurry. Amaterasu789 (talk) 00:06, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

Never mind.Amaterasu789 (talk) 00:07, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

Bring someone? For what? If you were having a problem on the Beyblade wiki, then you should ersolve that problem on your own.-- Ninja Sheik  00:19, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

Chat
Can the Wiki add a chat? I've seen other Wiki's have one. Reply back when you see this.--King4D (talk) 03:49, November 11, 2011 (UTC)

Why? Who are you?-- Ninja Sheik  04:11, November 11, 2011 (UTC)

I'm not a registered, or whatever it is called, user, but I'm wondering, why did you undo my edit? He did die ... and that was the correct spot for it, no? He was reanimated from death ... Am I misunderstanding something?--128.151.150.17 (talk) 03:31, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Although technically Gaara did die in that arc, he was resurrected and brought back to life. So, he still counts as living.-- Ninja Sheik  03:37, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

I do see your point; my thought process was that he was dead, and thus his death should be noted, and then his resurrection is mentioned a couple lines down, in the description of Chiyo's death, since it is the resurrection jutsu that she uses on him that passes her life force into him in order to revive him. New realization: (lightbulb!) I suppose if he is to be included, though, then all those who were killed in the invasion of Pain and then revived by Nagato would also need to be included. I've played with dominoes before ...; it hadn't occurred to me -- it was sort-of a "Hey, what about Gaara?" moment. Sorry about that; I see now.--128.151.150.17 (talk) 03:49, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Uh... Okay, then.-- Ninja Sheik  03:54, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Hi.--Darkusgal231 00:20, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Uh, hi.-- Ninja Sheik  00:25, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

yamanaka clan
Mind telling me why the previous trivia note on the page shouldnt be there?--AMTNinja (talk) 23:31, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

It wasn't relevant.-- Ninja Sheik  23:39, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

There's other irrelevant trivia. But when you're talking about the physical appearances of a clan's members... how is that irrelevant? AMTNinja (talk) 23:46, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Every clan member, as Cerez-senpai stated at the discussion page, has physical traits similar to their rest of their clansmen. They're all from the same family, so of course they going to have similarities. It's not worth mentioning.-- Ninja Sheik  23:50, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, but it can also be a somewhat noticeable characteristic. The Uzumaki have bright red hair, and hell, even the uchiha clan page says something about their members wearing their black high-collared shirts with their clan's symbol on the back. I mean whether or not you think it's worthy mentioning, the purpose of trivia is to add in interesting facts, whether they're important or not. AMTNinja (talk)

If you feel so strongly about the matter, why are you discussing it here on my talk page and not on the Yamanaka's discussion page? The red hair of the Uzumaki was added to their page probably because it's been stated so many time in the manga, it was worth mentioning. It's part of their heritage. However, such things about the "ponytails" of the Yamanaka clan isn't worthy mentioning. It's just a hairstyle. Take it up with the others, not just me.-- Ninja Sheik  00:16, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

Its on the discussion page, i brought it up with you since you were the one who reverted it and deemed it unworthy, so I naturally came to you with it. AMTNinja (talk) 00:29, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

I'm not the only who thinks it's unworthy. Omni-senpai and Cerez-senpai already explained it to. I re-read the conversation, so I don't see why you're being so stubborn and can't accept the fact that they are right.-- Ninja Sheik  00:34, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

My Jiraiya Edit
First off, thanks for undoing my edit, as I was just about to do so, since I immediately noticed my input was already noted in his Senjutsu section. xD To answer your question, Fukasaku stated that when he was explaining to Naruto about what it takes to enter Sagd Mode: Truly massive amounts of powerful chakra and the guts to fight on. :) Skitts (talk) 03:33, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Oh, okay, then! You're welcome, I guess. :)-- Ninja Sheik  03:37, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Kabuto
Look at the talk page about Kabuto we are talking about the genjutsu abilities. --Nitram86 (talk) 19:20, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

I'm perfectly well aware of Kabuto's abilities to use genjutsu. However, the picture of him using Temple of Nirvana Technique is needed on the page, because it looks too cramped on the page and the way you wrote did not suffice.-- Ninja Sheik  19:26, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Forehead Protector
Before you just remove random trivia like that one about Kakashi, make sure you actually think it's useless. It actually is true, see this article page for proof of my trivia statement --Speysider (Talk Page) 20:30, April 3, 2012 (UTC)

Oh, I know it's true. I just don't think it's very relevant.-- Ninja Sheik  20:36, April 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * I feel it's important to mention it, just so people who come to the Kakashi Gaiden think "Why isn't he wearing his headband like an eye patch?". If it's not relevant, then Jacce, Cerez or one of the other popular editors will remove it. --Speysider (Talk Page) 20:38, April 3, 2012 (UTC)

Some characters change the way they wear their forehead protectors. Like Temari, for example.-- Ninja Sheik  20:40, April 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * see the talk page --Speysider (Talk Page) 20:43, April 3, 2012 (UTC)

Hey there, I have a question for you but I already wrote it in talk: Six Paths of Pain. Please look at the question.--Filipinoboy97 (talk) 21:40, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Uh...okay.-- Ninja Sheik  21:49, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

XD Thanks.--Filipinoboy97 (talk)

re:Help & Favor
First of all, did you try to contact those editors that are against you, and talk it out with them there? Then, about the crew thing, her infobox already lists which crews she belong in, so it's not trivia worthy; that aside, it has been stated that certain other members (and characters) belong in other crews, so the trivia point is actually redundant. Then about the bickering rivals overcoming their opponents, I see your point, but the readers at least must know that the two won against their enemies, just to point out what happens in order for Usopp to progress the storyline. And I can delete your user page, but do you really want me to delete your talk page as well? Yatanogarasu (Talk) 22:01, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

Well, thanks for your compliments. I know it's tough, but let's face the facts: One Piece Wiki is less organized compared to Narutopedia (do NOT tell anyone I said that). I had my ups and downs with several editors, and believe me, one of them is still quite stubborn (no names will be revealed for privacy reasons); I nominated him to be banned, but seems like he got off lucky every time by about 51%/49% on his side. Well, if you see any big edits and can't resist to make it, then go ahead, and if any problems arise, I (and hopefully, the other admins who are not too busy) will give you all the help and support. Good luck there as much as here. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 23:28, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

I stay at that Wiki because I love One Piece, and it was the first Wiki I ever started on. Also, I made accommodations and hard-effort edits that I am proud of there, we all have our styles. And your talk page is locked now, call me if you wanna change your mind. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 00:33, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

Just SeaTerror complaining on your desire to delete your user page and whatnot. And you're welcome for all. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 00:53, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. Dunno if I'm actually gonna participate in that forum, because I want to remain impartial, especially there is no rules against what you requested and that I helped you with it. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 02:40, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

There you go. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 23:38, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

Don't worry, we tend to make large impacts on most minor matters, while ironically ignoring the large matters. Funny, huh? Anyways, you're welcome. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 23:46, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

Ending the discussion
I'll bother you the last time, I do not know if you read my last post before the deletion of your talk page (hence now you cannot even retrieve it from the history page), anyway I don't know if there is an existing policy, but usually users who want to achieve what you want they: Aside from the user profile, deleting the user talk page is really a bother because you cannot pretend to be not contacted while still editing (you can make still mistake), that's why usually one write a few words about how contact them (something like this although this one is pretty elaborated). Aside from all the discussion did you realize that I simply ask "hey I found this bothersome for the users here, can you please change it?" and you replied with "To me it doesn't make difference, but I don't want to do that" which can be found somewhat rude since you said to not have any reason to not grant my request... but to avoid misunderstanding if the community there won't make any decision in future, I won't insist anymore on this.
 * Blank out their personal pages.
 * Leave a short message like "Hi, you can contact me on ... wiki"
 * Make a soft redirect like  (user page) and   (talk page).

To further clear things up: I'll say something obvious, but remember the your account is on Wikia which is global to every wiki on its network, so each wiki is not a site per se. I say this because not so many users have clear the difference between Wikia, wiki, Wikipedia, MediaWiki and so on.

Then some advices: since a wiki runs thanks to a community is inevitable to come in disagreement with someone else, everyone at least one time had to let go in a discussion and accept unwillingly the other (community) decision. Sometime you will found users with you will found annoying, I'm probably one of them now, but don't make it a big deal and just ignore them. I didn't follow much the wiki since I'm already an administrator of other wikis, so I don't know which arguments made you fell One Piece Wiki "uncomfortable", but for that I'm sorry. If you have any problems I'll always be at your disposal.

Last thing, I apologize if I was annoying or rude to you. I hope you understand that I didn't mean to be. 00:25, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

Maybe you want to know that SeaTerror brought up this forum. I don't know if you wish to contribute to it since you may end to flame it arguing with SeaTerror (I know he's stubborn), but at least I thought I had to inform you. Whatever you choose to contribute to it or just keep an eye on it, it's your choice. Bye. 00:54, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

About the OP...
If you have a problem with the other editors over some matter, and don't wanna use talk pages, why not start forums? You can use that as a means of communication. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 21:28, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm fine with protecting your pages. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 21:55, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

Why did you do that? It took 30 mins for me to do.--Titans24

It wasn't worded correctly and it was not needed.-- Ninja Sheik  00:06, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Why do you keep deleting my work? I work hard on it, stop it!--(Titans24 (talk) 21:54, April 25, 2012 (UTC))

First, please use proper grammar when editing on my talk page. Second, look on your talk page for my response.-- Ninja Sheik  22:00, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

I am new here, I am trying to learn put stuff up I like naruto so much, but it's hard.--(Titans24 (talk) 21:54, April 25, 2012 (UTC))

Sign your posts when editing someone else's page.-- Ninja Sheik  22:08, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

I put facts in that I know. Where's the rules at?--(Titans24 (talk) 22:23, April 25, 2012 (UTC))Titans24

How does my Sakura edit not make sense? - 500benz

You got the wrong person, I didn't undo anything on Sakura's page. That was Kunoichi101.-- Ninja Sheik  23:51, May 10, 2012 (UTC)

Revived Akatsuki Profile Info
Shouldn't it be noted under the main Akatsuki characters short introduction that they were revived by Kabuto? It is a major turning point for them in the story and It should be noted under their main info. Not just mentioned somewhere in their story.Even though they may not be in a steady state. It is a return for them in the series ever since they deceased. Also everything about them can be found in their main profile even stuff under their short introductions, so why bother to mention the stuff in their short intro's? This event is a major turning point in the series. And it absolutely should be mentioned in their short introductions. It is for this reason why I am editing their profiles. I hope this discussion has justified my actions. The Dark Sorcerer (talk) 17:21, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

No, it shouldn't be mentioned on their short introduction. The point of it to describe who the character is, not him being revived by Kabuto that is perfectly explained below.-- Ninja Sheik  17:24, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

Many of their introductions hold vital information about their role in the story. For example see Kabuto's profile. Would you not agree that it reveals his role in the story? You seem to be contradicting yourself. The Dark Sorcerer (talk) 17:27, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

No, I am not. Kabuto was once a major supporting character in the series, but since allied himself with Madara, it explains his status from a supporting character to a major villain. Look, you've been warned and your edits been reverted by multiple users. Do it again, and one of us will be force to take actions.-- Ninja Sheik  17:32, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

The Akatuski were once a major organisation, until most of them got deceased. The resurrection explains their return to the story, so it should be mentioned in their introductions. Why are you becoming the enemy of reason? I don't understand why you think what I am doing is wrong. Why am I being warned for an edit that is completely necessary? You don't have any right to take action on me as I have done nothing wrong except prove a point. Which you can't seem to comprehend. The Dark Sorcerer (talk) 17:55, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

It's already explained in the story below. Their Legacy and the Shinobi War Arc. They have always been one of the main in the plot, always. Nothing's changed if they had die. The introduction is to describe who they are, not what they ddi in the story. That's why we have a History section. The only one who's being unreasonable here is you. Your reasons have also been countered by Cerez-senpai, and other users such as Jacce-senpai as reverted your edit. I have no wish to get to an edit war on you when it is blatantly obvious and clear why them being revived is not necessary.-- Ninja Sheik  18:05, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

Killing Intent
Sakki (殺気) literally means "thirst for blood" in Japanese, though it is commonly translated as "killing intent". The actual word for "killing intent, murderous intention, etc." is "殺意", romanized as "satsui". If it&#39;s worth doing, it&#39;s worth overdoing (talk) 19:40, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Well, I don't read Japanese, but that has always been the literal translation for it on the wiki. But I see your point. Or it could be it is written differently in Japanese, I know there is more than one style, but if you says so, then okay.-- Ninja Sheik  19:35, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Are you an admin by the way?If it&#39;s worth doing, it&#39;s worth overdoing (talk) 19:40, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Oh, no. But I'd like to be on this wiki. I'm an admin on the KH Wiki, though.-- Ninja Sheik  19:42, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Which wiki is that?If it&#39;s worth doing, it&#39;s worth overdoing (talk)

Kingdom Hearts.-- Ninja Sheik  19:46, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, well, thank you for your cooperation :) If it&#39;s worth doing, it&#39;s worth overdoing (talk) 19:51, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Sure. :) But because I don't read Japanese, one of the other users might revert your edit if you change it and combat your reason. I can't really get involve in something I have knowledge about. Good luck here.-- Ninja Sheik  19:54, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Well, I'll put what I told you in the trivia section, so that should solve that problem. Oh, and would you mind doing a fanfic review? If it&#39;s worth doing, it&#39;s worth overdoing (talk) 19:59, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

That depends on what kind of fic it is. And who do you know I have an FF. Net account? You saw my userpage?-- Ninja Sheik  20:10, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Not on fanfiction.net, on narutofanon. I didn't know you had an FF.net account until you told me just now.If it&#39;s worth doing, it&#39;s worth overdoing (talk)

Oh, I don't go there.-- Ninja Sheik  20:10, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

All right, then. But would you read the character if I send the link? If it&#39;s worth doing, it&#39;s worth overdoing (talk) 20:14, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

I guess.-- Ninja Sheik  20:15, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Kenji Kayuga ( http://narutofanon.wikia.com/wiki/Kenji_Kayuga ) Daisuke Murakami ( http://narutofanon.wikia.com/wiki/Daisuke_Murakami ) Miyuki Murakami ( http://narutofanon.wikia.com/wiki/Miyuki_Murakami ) Sayuri Takahashi ( http://narutofanon.wikia.com/wiki/Sayuri_Takahashi )

Sorry if they're a bit long, but I wanted to have the opinion of an experienced editor on this site XD. If it&#39;s worth doing, it&#39;s worth overdoing (talk) 21:35, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

I skimmed through. The articles looks good, but the images looks kinda blurry. Other than that, it looks good. I saw some red links, too. All in all, it looks pretty good.-- Ninja Sheik  21:43, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. If it&#39;s worth doing, it&#39;s worth overdoing (talk) 21:49, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Sure, no problem.-- Ninja Sheik  21:56, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

re:Our Talk
Sure, anytime, I'll wait for you. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 17:30, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

OP user
No worries. I got off on the wrong foot with the user there due to an honest misunderstanding, and he thought he tried to evade me from there by contacting me here. It's fine. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 01:14, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Kunoichi101
I cannot spell...anyway. From what I can gather, she reacted, rather violently, to being asked to stop adding the English name to anime episodes. A bunch of crap continued to escalate into Jacce saw fit put her on a 3 day suspension. I have, unfortunently been avoiding this little squabble as I felt my interference would only cause more problems so I suggest you ask the ones involved (UltimateSupreme, Spey, Novelist and Kunoichi)--TheUltimate3 (talk) 22:54, June 8, 2012 (UTC)

All right. I'm going to give her a good talking to. She'll listen to me, probably.-- Ninja Sheik  22:59, June 8, 2012 (UTC)

Re: User Rights
Well I haven't been given the chance to respond but Dan opened up the user rights function to allow rollback users and admins to give others the rollback flag. I never wanted to use it for personal reasons, but since Narutpedia doesn't really value rollback rights as highly as other wikia for example and you're mostly dedicated to reverting vandalism, I decided to give you flag. Any way all of this rambling was a roundabout way to say you're welcome lol.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 18:34, June 10, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, Cerez-senpai! :)-- Ninja Sheik  18:35, June 10, 2012 (UTC)

*sigh*
You're right. maybe i do have problems with him. first, the episodes and now... main templates. when I looked at Jacce's talk page, he thinks i'm nuisance because I don't do replying on other's talk pages. Kunoichi101 (talk) 23:39, June 21, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101


 * What the heck? You seriously need to start reading things properly. I said you don't use talkpages on articles to discuss things, rather you just start revert warring. And I would really appreciate it if you did not title a user talkpage with someone's username and insult them. It's rude. --Speysider Talk Page 23:41, June 21, 2012 (UTC)


 * Uh... Guys, can you take this somewhere else? And Jenny, please stop getting into edit wars with others, just take it on the discussion pages, okay?-- Ninja Sheik  23:42, June 21, 2012 (UTC)


 * I tried, but I have to wait, thanks to him enlisting me from Jacce. I'm not in conflicts with him. Kunoichi101 (talk) 00:01, June 22, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101


 * I only responded here because I was being bashed and insulted for no reason. I would recommend you ask Kunoichi in private to find a more suitable place to talk 1-1 rather than this public wiki that everyone can see. --Speysider Talk Page 23:44, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

You're blocked, Jenny? Ugh... Okay, don't get into any more conflicts, please. Just talk calmly when you block is over. I really don't wanna get involve with this.-- Ninja Sheik  00:05, June 22, 2012 (UTC)


 * She is not blocked. =.=
 * She's just been listed for blocking. --Speysider Talk Page 20:45, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I see.-- Ninja Sheik  20:49, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * He's right. I'm not blocked right now, and I also have to wait, although the admins are deciding whether I'll receive warning or being blocked for three days. Next time, be careful on paying attention. Kunoichi101 (talk) 21:25, June 22, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101
 * That;s my line, Jen. Just be careful before you get into an argument with the others, okay?-- Ninja Sheik  21:31, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

Revert your Censorship
I provided information the the creation rebirth page about how the marks disappear along with the yin seal WITH citation. I am quite furious about how my contributions can just be removed like that after digging through my manga books to find an accurate reference. I put the references there to help differentiate Creation Rebirth from Strength of a Thousand. If you look at the talk section for Strength of a Thousand lots of people are confused about the difference between the two.

Pointing out that the marks disappear IS major difference between the two.

Revert your censorship, it took time looking for that reference and you have no right to remove it based on a whim. 203.77.81.181 (talk) 02:45, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Actually, it's not a major difference, and it's not censorship. And you're being quite rude over something quite trivial. Everyone knows that mark disappears when Tsunade uses that technique. Look at the discussion and talk over there, not on my talk page. And for the record, you didn't have to spend a lot of time searching through your manga books for a reference. The first apperance of the technique is in the infobox on the technique's page.-- Ninja Sheik  02:49, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Lockdown
I think that you first must ask the central to activate the "protect site" function, then you will find it under the admin dashboard. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:38, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Please.
Please do not delete my contributions without even reviewing them. Thank you.--FemaleUchiha

First, sign your posts. Second, I looked it over, but it seems my other...comrades have a problem with it. I'm just following the example of who I trust in.-- Ninja Sheik  17:13, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

What's the matter of his comrades? FemaleUchiha (talk) 17:19, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Well, I remember one user asked for a reason. But if you guys are having an editing war, you can just take it to the discussion page of the the Chakra page.-- Ninja Sheik  17:21, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Vandal
Well, VegaDark, a member of the VSTF has just performed a range block with her the IP range she edits from, so she should be out of commission for the duration of that block. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:42, July 10, 2012 (UTC)

Regarding Oro's sage mode
We HAVE reached a conclusion, Omnibender, Cerez, Elveonora, myself, and the host of other users involved in a lengthy discussion on the talk page all agree that he should be added, it's vast majority conclusion, that one dissenting user (SuperSaiyaMan) is the only one who is aggressively reverting the edits regarding the issue.Jetdeagon (talk) 23:33, July 10, 2012 (UTC)

the chapter is pretty clear that he can use a Sage Mode, Senjutsu chakra is 3 energies mixed together and it triggers Sage Mode--Elveonora (talk) 23:32, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * You're right. Everyone else thinks so too except that one user who won't let it go and keeps reverting the edits. Shouldn't the mass vast majority conclusion/opinion trump a single user's dissention? Jetdeagon (talk) 23:33, July 10, 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I read the chapter about it a million times, so I know that too, but I know there was a lengthy discussion about it, but seeing as there was an edit war going there, I assume everyone was aruging back and forth between the edits. We do that a lot here.-- Ninja Sheik  23:35, July 10, 2012 (UTC)

@NinjaSheik, if he said: "natural energy" that that wouldn't be a proof of being a Sage. But only Sages use Senjutsu chakra, please revert your edits back--Elveonora (talk) 23:36, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not Ninja, Ninja was just leaving it unchanged because it appeared that there was a big argument about it because of all the edits and then reverts. In reality it's just that one user, SuperSaiyaMan, that has reverted/changed the sage mode page, the senjutsu page, and orochimaru's page countless times today against oro having SM. Jetdeagon (talk) 23:38, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * What Jetdeagon says. I'm not reverting it anymore, I only did because I thought the discussion was still going on. But if SuperSaiyanMan is reverting it still, then please talk to him to resolve that matter with him.-- Ninja Sheik  23:49, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and fixed the pages, again, and if SuperSaiyaMan wants to have another coronary about it then a mod or someone with proper authority is gonna have to instruct him to leave the pages alone.Jetdeagon (talk) 23:55, July 10, 2012 (UTC)