Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-5054236-20150717003436/@comment-24808887-20151213053506

Thekillman wrote: It's not. Green is a color, but by itself is made of the colors yellow and blue -and mixing it doesn't change that. We see it differently, but if you analyzed the actual light you could pull it apart as yellow and blue.

No green one colour and when you add yellow to blue you get green as one colour(not combinational) - matters not for it's ontological history what really matters is what color present at the time.

Thekillman wrote: Nope, because as i said, a persons chakra isn't limited to one form of chakra, just as a color is not limited to one base color. Naruto adjusted the chakra for each person, thus by definition not giving them their power. When supplying Naruto with their KKG, the biju did give them the chakra color that granted him Lava/Magnet etc release.

In biju case their chakra became Naruto's so it affect and changed his signature

Thekillman wrote: Many Jutsu are just that: techniques, not innate powers. Just as Naruto gave Sasuke chakra to heal in Boruto TM, Sakura gave Obito the color that didn't heal him like her Strength of a Hundred seal but rather a color he could use for Kamui.

I think it is you the one who confuses techniques, innate powers and chakra signatures.

Thekillman wrote: Again, just like a color (which isn't my invention - the Manga itself describes it as a color), Kabuto's chakra signature became a mixture of colors he achieved. That doesn't mean those colors aren't there individually anymore.

Actually it means exactly that unless someone by fact proven otherwise(which no one did).

Thekillman wrote: Kabuto could call upon each absorbed individual, which in fact proves my point. If he can do that, why could Hagoromo not do the same?

Now you confusing actuall technique(DNEI) with chakra signature.

Thekillman wrote: Also, stop accusing me of not reading your post when you simply disagree with me. I just remembered what you wrote in vs section about you can't be bothered with reading long post, it your own words. Thekillman wrote: The difference is that you consider a mixed chakra a singular chakra type, when a mixed color is in itself a color, but still a mixture.

No, i consider one person's chakra wich he produces as his signature it matters little about how he originally got it, by mixing, stealing or cultivating, there has been cases when chakra with modifications was not recognized(Kabuto, Obito) there was cases when it was(Madara) wich only speaks about percentage of how much signature was affected. Never ever not in any occurrences not single individual ever showed more than one signature.

Thekillman wrote: Or they're simply not capable enough to tell the signatures apart? Even though hashirama sensed Madara across the world, he couldn't tell that Naruto and Sasuke were Transmigrants. If the god of shinobi Hashirama can't sense it, why would Karin/Minato? Yet, Hagoromo stated he clearly saw Ashura/Indra's chakra in Naruto/Sasuke.

You had right guessing but you still got wrong conclusion. Hashirama nor Madara never knew about transmigrants Naruto is Hashirama's relative and Sasuke is Madara's any similirities between their signatures can be disregarded as signatures of relatives(Tobirama identified Karin as Uzumaki by her chakra signature). That's if we take as given suggestion that at some point one particular sensor used sense on pair Na-Ha or Sa-Ma.

Thekillman wrote: That proves my idea right -that a chakra signature is a mixture- and that it indeed takes the literal God of Shinobi to even see it

Not considering we using as term word wich represents something one's unique and atributed only to him as identifier, we don't argue about this identifier being or not being assembled from parts of others(we know it as given fact). Our matter of our disussion was can or can not one possess more that single identifier(signature) simultaneously to wich i gave my arguments against and you just gone offtop - cause you did not bring any argument to conclude yes one can. So again what was your idea? Cause complex "one" is still "one" and you not even mentioned "second".