User talk:Rachin123

Re: Talkpage input 2
Done mate. I had already given input on one of the two discussions already :p Munchvtec (talk) 19:04, June 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Would you mind taking a look at this? Munchvtec (talk) 02:47, June 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks @rai Munchvtec (talk) 02:55, June 22, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Move
No, I won't revert the edits. If you look at the page history, you will see that one user arbitrarily changed the title in the past without gaining any consensus whatsoever just because that name bothered him, which is not a reason at all to change page names. Given that the old title of "Ink Creation" was the agreed title, I moved the page back to that agreed title. I didn't notice it until I saw your talkpage posts about it. The discussion can continue regardless of the name change, because the title the article now uses was the previously agreed page name. --Sajuuk 19:34, June 19, 2016 (UTC)

RE:Thank You
No prob, happy to help out :) --Sarutobii2 (talk) 13:05, June 27, 2016 (UTC)

That thread
Yo! I really do apologize if i came off as rude. I was being rude. Hope we're cool mate. Munchvtec (talk) 20:08, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * You're taking me WAYYYYY to seriously man :/ I'm Munch, if i say something rude, that rude statement is only meant to remain there. It's nothing but a petty argument between friends, no? Are we not allowed to argue at all? Must i kiss your ass? Jeez, sorry mate. Munchvtec (talk) 22:39, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * Anything that i say that comes off as rude is only for that specific thing or moment. That's it. Munchvtec (talk) 22:41, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know what was so rude about this comment:


 * "Nah, it's not a reality check. A reality check is an occasion on which one is reminded of the state of things in the real world.


 * Naruto is very, very far from reality."Munchvtec (talk) 22:45, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * Here's the order of things. I apologized, you said i was forgiven. I do nothing (at least to my knowledge all i did was define a phrase showing disagreement) and i get another message saying i'm being rude? What the fuck! To me it seems like you just don't want me commenting :/ As there was nothing rude about my last comment in that thread yet you're triggered >.< I'm just going to let this one go for the sake of things but know that i honest to goodness had no intent on being rude... Munchvtec (talk) 00:05, July 4, 2016 (UTC)

Might need you to step in.
SwordSlayer99 among other users on a certain thread, are being insulting and hostile and I do believe they are trolling. They also refuse to listen to anybody. I seriously think they are trolling man. QuakingStar (talk) 03:00, July 5, 2016 (UTC)

Thread
Yo. Just saw this thread. Something like this is probably better removed, they're not really starting any discussion, just posting to state some personal opinion without making any explanation as to why. Just some friendly advice, is all. :) --Sajuuk 21:50, July 10, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Concern
Depending on the user, you can tell by the edits alone. To be absolutely sure, you'd have to request a Check User, but as you can tell by the page, there are restrictions. I've learned that the central wiki is rather fickle when it comes to requests about this. In the past, I got completely different reactions in different moments, about very similar situations. One time they ran the tool alright, and the other, they out-right refused, saying there was not enough evidence to run the tool. Regardless, you should always resort to the sysop requests page first. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 12:07, July 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests can only be filed by sysops/bureaucrats of the wiki and the response you get will vary by which staff member picks up the ticket. --Sajuuk 12:12, July 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * I leave the matter in Omni's hands since you went to him fist and in case he's already contacted wikia. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 00:12, July 13, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not that i don't care, it's that 2 users sharing the same views in versus threads is extremely common with only 2 options to choose from. Unless he shares incorrect grammar or something else that's undoubtedly identifiable, im not going to contact wikia without evidence. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 14:40, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

re: message
If you want to take my post out of context, feel free to do so. The post was a response to the point that he "did not get a warning" about the block, so I pointed it out to him in a polite and casual manner that he could have easily found out that he was blocked by trying to make edits to the wiki.

Additionally, he would have received an email from the wiki if he was following his own userpage, notifying him of the block (as when you are blocked and you follow your own userpage/user talkpage, the system emails you with a notice that your userpage was edited, with the block reason given there).

My message does not match the definition of "harassment" under any circumstances (unlike QuakingStar's blatantly vitriolic response), so do not edit my comments claiming harassment on talkpages again, as that is not your call to make. --Sajuuk 21:37, July 13, 2016 (UTC)


 * Good to see this conversation is over. Everybody play nice now. Hint.--TheUltimate3 Akimichi Symbol.svg (talk) 23:45, July 13, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Hmmm
I see. Very well. That's good to hear. Apologizes to both of you then.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 12:53, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

PKM
You're a fan of Pokemon right? Been playing PKM GO at all? --Sarutobii2 (talk) 15:13, July 25, 2016 (UTC)
 * Iv'e been playing it ever since it was released. It's pretty addictive and im sure you'll enjoy it. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 16:17, July 25, 2016 (UTC)

Yo
Message me on my talkpage when you are available for a chat. --Sajuuk 10:59, August 17, 2016 (UTC)

Opinion needed
Hey. What's your opinion regarding threads such as these? I know I have no moderational power over the forums so that it's not really my place to be asking about it, but I was under the impression that such threads had no real place on the wiki because of the chat being a better place for random spam discussions like that. Thanks. --Sajuuk 11:20, September 11, 2016 (UTC)

Chakra needle
I think hand seal for chakra needle is horse and then ram,as seen in shippuden 490,it's twice shown,first at hinoko chasing the guy in forest and again at the checkpoint of village with Shikamaru and Ro. Thanks for your time. Steviezhang (talk)steviezhang

RE. Naruto and Sasuke
Actually I'd argue that since Naruto has had actual taijutsu oriented training, his taijutsu is now better than Sasuke by a good amount. Even in Databook 3, they were tied in that regard for skill. Ninjutsu is equal on both, thats where they cancel each other out. When Naruto vs Sasuke began in the manga, Naruto was running on fumes and Sasuke had conserved most of his strength so he was in better condition. And Sasuke even berated Naruto for holding back so much, implying that Naruto could kill him if he wanted (like Madara and Hashirama's dialogue). Naruto and Sasuke aren't equal, there is a gap in strength, and the manga and all material, even Sasuke's own words (even saying Naruto is a step ahead of him) support this. The fact Sasuke got a one-time only power up while Naruto can use the Asura Form whenever he wants supports this.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 01:10, February 4, 2017 (UTC)
 * That incident you brought up was anime only, not in the manga. And Naruto hasn't shown great skill in taijutsu since Part II? He was holding off fighters that Kakashi was being pwned in in terms of taijutsu (such as Deva Path), could handle Karui's kenjutsu bare handed, and hold his own against Itachi's taijutsu. Not to mention he has a taijutsu style to fall on, Frog Kata, which Sasuke really can't fight against. Naruto and Sasuke's ninjutsu are also equal Rai...and you're kind of throwing your weight around to get your opinion across. Even QuakingStar agreed Naruto has the edge when it comes to Naruto and Sasuke. And how does Sasuke, without the use of the Biju, even compete with Naruto's Asura Form? Can you honestly answer that?--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 03:57, February 4, 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh and 'Naruto bombards the enemy with numbers' thing stopped being Naruto's main tactic when Part II began. He uses smaller numbers in more strategic uses, the only times when he used masses of shadow clones to attack in Part II were: Against Kaguya (who he had to keep distracted long enough), against Son Goku (so he could be thrown up), against Pain (cleverly disguising them as debris in an attempt to outlast Shinra Tensei) and against Madara (to stop his Wood Release). That's it if you're going by manga. He had improved immensely in taijutsu and only got better with age, learning Frog Kata and holding his own against other taijutsu oriented fighters easily...while Sasuke kinda stagnated in that regard post-Itachi fight.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 04:30, February 4, 2017 (UTC)

Thoughts
Could you give your thoughts here? Seems i'm just wasting my time just bumping things. Munchvtec (talk) 00:36, March 11, 2017 (UTC)

Itachi in the academy.
Itachi first novel the first chapter. I don't think these wikia editors have read it. Itachi was claimed to have the highest scores alongside the 4th Hokage, except Minato was 10, Itachi was 6 (7 since they held him for awhile) Plus he had a higher score on some of the field test but "100" was the highest they could give him, Even though he broke the record on the field test with the 30 second mark, when the average was 3-5 minutes. ~The Hero~ 02:11, March 19, 2017 (UTC)

Question
Is there a way I can become a moderator or a admin???

So how do I become a Moderator???? --Xthekiller20023 (talk) 12:01, March 23, 2017 (UTC) Xthekiller20023

Superman Vs Naruto
I did check out the comic-vine site, Their were Narutards. Honestly I never thought people would actually believe that Naruto could win. I concede that you were right about the fanboys. Namikazenaruto9 (talk) 23:38, April 17, 2017 (UTC)

Edit revision
Um, Hi. U said u wanted to talk with meh so speak up. I honestly don't understand why u are undoing my edit on Hanabi Hyuga's page. Come on fam I'm seriously confused. All I did was add a full body image of what Hanabi's attire was in Part I like seriously fam you are constantly triggered. BTW, respond back cause if u don't ima be pissed.

Hanabi Taijutsu
I hear what you are saying, but Hanabi specializes in taijutsu unlike Kakashi. Also, Naruto's taijutsu at the time was very basic whereas Boruto's is very advanced for his age, able to fight on par with the more experienced Iwabee.--Steveo920 (talk) 21:50, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * Hanabi didn't just grab Boruto, she quickly got through his defense and took him done to the ground to pine him. Kakashi is technically an expert in taijutsu himself, but again, Naruto had only basic if not sloppy skill in taijutsu at the time, not to mention that Kakashi was twice Naruto's size and weight. Boruto is very advanced in taijutsu himself, able to use the Gentle Fist himself (excluding actual tenketsu strikes), showing a noticeable difference in skill from Hanabi. I'm not saying that she is a specialist in submissions, just that she is skilled in them.--Steveo920 (talk) 00:20, June 9, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Direct translations
I believe it was more of an informal decision that the articles that were translated directly from the databooks aren't modified. These aren't a lot— mostly ones from DB 1 and 2 (maybe 3). There have also been reversions made to articles when these translations in the past but, I'd be hard pressed to find it since we can't search for edit summaries. I did find this discussion we had a while back though; I don't know if it sates your request.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 13:34, July 29, 2017 (UTC)

Chakra Flow
You should read up the content we have on Chakra Flow beforehand... Every person has chakra flowing through them. That doesn't make it chakra flow. The strength increase applies chakra control, not chakra flow, just like the walking on trees and water.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 08:48, July 31, 2017 (UTC)
 * Then why revert it, and say "not necessarily"? O.o Like, I don't want to be an asshole here but if you do something, just own up to it. :D--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 08:56, July 31, 2017 (UTC)
 * Usually, the "right" thing to do would be to revert only when you're a hundred per cent sure what you're doing and not, as I said, "making stuff up as you go" for the sake of a revert, but I've made similar mistakes in the past myself, so...--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 09:35, July 31, 2017 (UTC)
 * I mean, at least don't contradict yourself :D

"when have you've known me to make stuff up" "inserting false information" Inserting false information IS making stuff up, so... :D--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 09:44, July 31, 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, since I'm pretty positive that you're mad at me for coming to you to prevent what would quite possibly have been a revert war, I'mma stop and let you think over our conversation for a bit :) Have a good day Rai o/--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 09:47, July 31, 2017 (UTC)