Talk:Unsealing Technique

Named?
When was the name of this technique revealed? It was neither mentioned in the data-books nor in the Anime.
 * It wasn't revealed, because this technique doesn't exist. Weapons and the like aren't summoned, they're unsealed. Something that wasn't considered a jutsu as such, since it was never even mentioned in the databooks. --ShounenSuki 22:21, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Egh. It's not worth a deletion as it is technically something. It's not ninjutsu, but it is something. It just needs some reworking.--TheUltimate3 22:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * All right, that's fair. However, the name has to change. This article isn't just about projectile weapons, after all. It's about any kind of sealed object. Also, blood is never used in the manga to unseal objects. --ShounenSuki 22:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

False info
Let's see, where should I start... --ShounenSuki 00:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) The name is fanon and does not properly describe what this 'jutsu' does
 * 2) The range of this 'technique' is unknown
 * 3) When has blood been needed to unseal weapons?
 * 4) This technique was never even mentioned or hinted at in the databooks. It's more of a general skill then a ninjutsu
 * 5) Basically, we don't know anything solid about the concepts discussed in the article.

Odd one you are.

--TheUltimate3 00:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) The name I conceade. Come up with a name yourself to call the article, or we leave it as is.
 * 2) Given the nature of what can be "unsealed", Long Range (0m-10m+) is approriate.
 * 3) No idea. If you think it's wrong, simply get rid of it.
 * 4) I was never a fan of having this wikia be a online databook as that defeats the purpose of both the wikia community and the databook. Regardless is regardless, this is something, general skill or otherwise.
 * 5) We also don't know how someone could spit a giant fireball out their mouths, but we know they do. We know ninja can summon or as you like to put it unseal a large assortment of things out of scrolls and stuff.

Puppet Masters Use It
They seal their puppets and unseal them from scrolls all the time. Both Chiyo, Sasori, and Kankurou have shown it. I added it to their jutsu but it was deleted. Why? Jules R. J. Blake (talk) 00:30, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Because they are using it in the same vain as any other person that uses it. I.E: Every ninja that had at least some form of Academy training.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 00:58, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * So why do others have it at all if it's considered an academy jutsu? Jules R. J. Blake (talk) 01:28, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Who, besides tenten (who uses this as her signature jutsu), has it? Simant (talk) 01:29, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Chiyo used it to summon Ma and Pa and the Ten Puppet Collection of Chikamatsu. Sasori used it to summon the Third and his Performance of 100. Kankurou used it to summon Karasu and the others. Jules R. J. Blake (talk) 01:37, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * You said they had it, implying they had it in their infobox. They may use it but since every ninja is capable of using it, it is not listed. Simant (talk) 01:43, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * But we list it for Tenten because she specializes in it? Jules R. J. Blake (talk) 01:53, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. Simant (talk) 01:55, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't puppet masters do the same, since that's where they keep their puppets? Plus, there's no proof that it's an academy jutsu. Who else has used it? Jules R. J. Blake (talk) 02:26, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * No puppeteers' jutsu focus on their puppets. The generic summon merely brings them their summons. Tenten's entire method of attack revolves around summoning and throwing weapons.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 02:29, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Activation
How are these things activated exactly? We have touch,, and. I would say chakra in general, but what about the second? Thomas Finlayson (talk) 22:05, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Rigours of age part
What I mean by the citations is that Kabuto had those corpses, but if they had started to decompose then he would have been unable to fool Yamato; the smell alone would have been a clue. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 05:20, June 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I was just going to remove that comment, because it also seems likely he could have simply preserved the body, he is a medical-nin after all. However I feel that'll just end up in a large circular conversation that'll accomplish nothing so yeah. Just going to say my peace here and go.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 09:57, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, and not to just prove you wrong, I have to agree with your point. Kabuto is a bad example, and he does do excellent work with corpses. I could argue about time available (Talk:Kabuto Yakushi) with the other stuff he had to do, but that would not do much. How about Fire Sealing Method then (yes, it is B-rank and used by a über-ranked shinobi) which is essentially a more advanced form of this. Would not the amatasaru have kept burning unless it was suspended (and yes, I admit I was the one who put foward the jutsu was based on this sealing technique). More to the point (and yes, this is low on empirical info) it is being stored as "information" which is not as changable as "matter" (edging towards speculation, I know). Thomas Finlayson (talk) 05:50, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

Chapter 508
So just to clarify, it is indeed possible to seal multiple jutsu inside of a scroll in the manga? Moreover, would that indeed classify as some special form of sealing jutsu, not just the generic? Thomas Finlayson (talk) 07:33, September 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep in mind, this will probably be my only comment on this matter. It was a trap. Traps are, for shinobi, generic. No matter what was hidden in it, it would still be generic.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 10:49, September 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I know what you said about that being probably your only comment, but could you clarify what you said a tad. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 22:00, September 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Shinobi use traps. That's very generic. Tripping a trap that summons deadly weapons, jutsu, a decoy, whatever is not all that special.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 22:12, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but that usually involves wire, knives, letter bombs, etc. Here we have jutsu popping out of scrolls. For me, that is a significant difference. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 04:55, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, and this is part is pure speculation, but what does it look like [[here] on the scroll on the top-right panel? 64.180.78.210 (talk) 05:23, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * The same random contents of every scroll.
 * This was a summoning, not a sealing. See prior examples of Iruka by Team 7, Manda by Suigetsu, and shadow clones by Fukasaku. ~SnapperTo 06:13, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Iruka did show that the summoning could be activated without the user's will (like with Guy here), but the water prison? Thomas Finlayson (talk) 23:11, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * This conversation has been mentioned [here] as well, and one key point was how exploding tags sealed jutsu inside of them as well. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 23:15, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * This isn't new. In the forest of death, the scrolls of heaven and earth were booby-trapped with a genjutsu if I recall. Also, when brought together properly acted as a summons. Arrancar79 (talk) 00:05, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought it was the summoned instructors, but details. So do we put it in then? Thomas Finlayson (talk) 00:15, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Not here; it's summoning nuance, not a sealing nuance.
 * Though, I would guess it's not so much a jutsu summoning as it is an animal summoning + an environment for the animal. Sharks kept in a water prison so that, when summoned, they could deal with prying eyes and make it to the nearest water source. Some sort of summoning-everything-within-a-predefined-ten-meter-area perhaps? ~SnapperTo 01:05, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I lean toward sealing of a summons and jutsu. Pure speculation, but I'd imagine hand seals are made chakra is spent, and the effect is sealed away till the condition is met to activate. A time delay of sorts. Arrancar79 (talk) 01:52, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is this entire discussion about whether or not it is possible to seal jutsu inside scrolls for later use? Because that should really be rather obvious.
 * Not only is that exactly what happened in chapter 508, similar things happened before as well. There's the summoning tattoos that highly resemble seals, Itachi's Transcription Seal: Amaterasu, that was a sealed technique beyond any doubt, and the teacher summons during the chūnin exams.
 * Really, sealing jutsu isn't that controversial. —ShounenSuki (talk 12:51, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

The Trivia
The trivia about it "apparently" sealing more that just items can be removed now Fangzntalonz (talk) 21:59, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Released Objects can stay Attached to the Seal
Generically when someone uses a seal it is like this, but there is an exception. While I am not sure if there are not anymore of these unusual seals in the manga, it is still worth noting. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 21:56, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

Thousand Hands Manipulation Military Art Thomas Finlayson (talk) 22:00, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

Naruto also uses this.
Shouldn't Naruto also be added to the user's list? He used it against Sasori and once again against the Three Tails (in the filler arc) when he summoned shuriken froma scroll...Sparxs77 (talk) 10:47, October 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's generic so everyone uses it. Tenten is mentioned because she specializes in it.--TheUltimate3~The User King~ 10:55, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

'Not needed. Summoning Scroll is still a summoning scroll'
I put down: More advanced users can rely upon a smaller seal in order to store their objects; for example storing multiple seals in their scroll as opposed to one. (4.↑ Naruto chapter 300, page 03 (5.↑ Naruto chapter 264, page 08 along with File:Summoning scroll for corpses.PNG

At first I confess I was confused why it was removed since it did make it clear that different people had different levels of ability, and that different scrolls could carry different amounts (sort of like a musket to a modern rifle in some ways, both kill but more shots). I admit the pictures position was awkward (and I was hoping someone who was better at that sort of stuff than me could fix it), and that indeed it may to some seem like it is still clear (so the situation makes a bit more sense), but I was hoping someone to could help clarify some more why it was removed. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 20:43, October 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * Because a summon scroll is a summon scroll. Drawing the seal differently or putting more things in it doesn't change the fact that it's still a summon scroll.--TheUltimate3~The User King~ 22:57, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 'The User King?' Anyways, it is indeed still a summoning scroll, but it is a different "type" of summoning scroll. The user can summon 20 weapons for example as opposed to just one. It indicates a difference in the users skill as well. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 02:13, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, the User King. Considering how my standard name is 'The Ultimate', dubbing myself a king is appropriate.
 * There's no proof that it indicates a users skill, it could just mean they wrote the jutsu formula (or whatever it is) differently. And no, just because it looks different doesn't mean it's a different measure of skill.--TheUltimate3~The User King~ 02:18, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * More curious than critical over the name. As for the rest, I would like to start by making it clear that does not 'look' different, it is different, like, hmm...new analogy, jean pockets and a backpack. As for the skill, I have a feeling that this will continue for a while, though I concede that, like a weapon, they could be gifts from other people, though I would definetely like to know why it should not be written on how some scrolls carry one weapon or 20 weapons and the backups that can be carried in your shirt pocket? As for the skill though, those with single-item scrolls though tend to be genin (Naruto), chunin (guy with that huge mace), or puppet masters (Sasori, Chiyo for the parent puppets, and Kankuro, and what they summon have tons of weapons anyways), while those with multi-scrolls include Sasuke, Kabuto, Shikamaru (abnormally skilled chunin), etc. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 03:57, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Because you assume the number of things people summon via scrolls has something to do with skill. There is nothing that suggests that, and no ninja rank does not indicate skill. Naruto is a genin but he's kage level.--TheUltimate3 ~The User King ~ 11:24, November 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Not to mention that skill might not be the reason for your observation. Naruto only summoned one shuriken, but there is no reason to assume that's all he can summon from that scroll. Kotetsu only summoned his mace, but that was a special weapon. He probably didn't even want to summon anything else.
 * Skill might have something to do with it, but there are various other factors that could be involved. Maybe sealing certain objects is more difficult than other. Perhaps bigger objects require more text. Even handwriting and simple æsthetics could have something to do with it. —ShounenSuki (talk 13:34, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Very well, I will let it go for now; I had indeed forgotten to consider what effect the objects might have had on this, as well. Though for Naruto it is more kage-level power, I am not so sure about skill and knowledge. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 22:05, November 10, 2010 (UTC)

Transportation Technique?
Where on Earth did this name come from? —ShounenSuki (talk 14:29, November 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, this would be nice to know.--TheUltimate3 ~The User King ~ 14:31, November 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * From the recent anime episode. Neji says that it's called the Transportation Technique. --OmegaRasengan


 * If the romaji you provided is what he called it, then that's a branch of jutsu, not this jutsu's name. ~SnapperTo 18:15, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Neji didn't say what the techniques name was, he says Tenten's scrolls use Jikūkan Ninjutsu to store and summon items.--Deva 27 (talk) 18:18, November 4, 2010 (UTC)

Third Paragraph...
is it just me, or does the third paragraph not make any sense? i think it's confusing. --Ampm123 (talk) 22:00, August 15, 2011 (UTC)Ampm123