User talk:Simant

Re: Jutsu Infobox
Shrug/ the field exists for a reason right?..--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 18:39, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, ya maybe...But well it will inform ppl, which name which we r going by, our structure, etc...And i still think dantman created the field for a reason...And evn in the older format we had it that way..Literal meaning→Kanji→Romanji→eng tv, Viz, etc...--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 18:43, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Umm...I'm not that good with references because I save those references for you just you reedit again. Kunoichi101 (talk) 03:34, October 3, 2009 (UTC)Kunoichi101Kunoichi101 (talk) 03:34, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Well, I was doing that, because 'Six Paths of Pain' and 'Deva Path' are listed as jutsu, not as characters. So if someone goes to deva path, and wants to see HIS jutsu he used in the series under his infobox, they will be able to. same with six paths of pain. that make more sense and sound good? or would u rather me revert?--SkyFlicker (talk) 16:55, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

That was for the same reason as well, so users can better see and sort jutsu that are related to the 6 paths of pain, and not to nagato himself. Im basically 'tree'ing it, so that once the parent/child stuff takes effect, it will be easier for people to navigate. Sound good? Or still want just 'Deva Path'?--SkyFlicker (talk) 17:00, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

As I just wrote on his... once this feature of parent/child comes into effect, the 'users' field isnt going to allow the jutsu to be nested correctly. since all of the paths are individually considered jutsu, and the 6 paths are considered jutsu, they need to be nested as jutsu in the 'parent jutsu' field, with 'nagato' being the 'user'--SkyFlicker (talk) 17:06, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Does 'media' need to be filled out for all infoboxes? because if you put 'anime episode xx', seems like people would know it was anime?--SkyFlicker (talk) 19:17, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing--SkyFlicker (talk) 19:21, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Am I aggrevatin you yet? lol--SkyFlicker (talk) 19:45, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Just trying to help, lol. Goin through them fairly fast, so may miss some stuff--SkyFlicker (talk) 19:56, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Nah, im finding a lot, just goin down the list alphabetically--SkyFlicker (talk) 20:06, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing--SkyFlicker (talk) 20:39, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Re: That thingy about the picture
Oh! I didn't notice that. My bad :3 ~Hakinu (talk 21:46, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Delete Tags
Please understand, that I'm not playing here, I'm not entertaining by putting one deletion tag, not 2001 tags. I suggest, that you don't accuse me that I "like putting delete tags up for no reason", like you wrote. Please, read explanations for this. Thank you for understanding. --Tserg (talk) 21:59, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, looks like I've accidentally copied the delete tag. I've been copying different tags to my TextEdit so I won't search for them again. And my internet have some technical problems; i'm sorry. Anyway 2 deletion tags are not 2002 :) --Tserg (talk) 22:06, October 3, 2009 (UTC)