Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-2140588-20150318152949/@comment-4271790-20150404103408

FF-Suzaku wrote: We could maybe take a page from Wowpedia and create some simple in-line headers that say, "This section concerns content exclusive to the anime," "This section concerns content exclusive to a novel," "This section concerns content exclusive to a movie," and "This section concerns content exclusive to a work that is considered non-canon." They could even have cute little icons as visual indicators (a television, a book, a film reel, etc.). Snapper2 wrote: I believe a prevailing philosophy for the wiki is that it make no declarations about what is and is not canon, at least within the articles. Some things need to be separated from others for simplicity's sake, but never for (stated) reasons of canonicity. Snapper2 wrote: Might as well make a video game tag also.

There would, of course, be only one template, with Anime/Novel/Movie/Game needing to be specified each time. Tags:, , , SuperSajuuk wrote: I noticed that mention was made to tags in the articles. I strongly oppose any kind of pointless template identifying anime/novel only content, there is absolutely no need for them. Just do "In the X", where X is the medium it appeared in, there's really no need for fancy and very distracting templates to be shoved in people's faces to point out the damn obvious that it only appeared in X. Saying "In the X" is more subtle and less irritating to wiki editors. Well, things have gotten interesting. Majority who wants it, they'll be put into articles. Majority doesn't want it, I'll happily tag the images for deletion, and the "tags" idea won't be executed.