User talk:SaiST

Hello SaiST, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Talk:Amaterasu page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Snapper2 (Talk) 04:05, April 14, 2010

SaiST, we got a bunch of trolls in Konoha Library that need bans
Another Yuri Yuki dupe and Hiko Seijurou are the ones that need banning at the moment, please respond if you're the same SaiST from Narutoforums.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 08:34, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Talk pages
Please avoid leaving replies to older messages in the middle of the text. Doing so breaks the chronological organisation of the discussion. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:51, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

Tags
Please be mindful of tags when rewriting article sections. Your recent rewriting of portions of the Mangekyō Sharingan article removed an "end summary" tag, causing the entire article to be transcribed into two other articles. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 13:29, July 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that. Lost track of it while rearranging the paragraphs earlier. I'll be sure to keep it in mind in the future. SaiST Mangekyō Sharingan Sasuke (Eternal).svg 13:46, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Susanoo Bow
Stuff from scanlations are acceptable if there are no watermarks and no English text in the image. Just upload it, add proper license and fair use rationale, and you're good to go. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 18:29, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

Changes
Please do not make such radical changes to articles, such as you have done recently with Sasuke Uchiha, or Blaze Release: Kagutsuchi, without first consulting the rest of the community on the talk pages. I realize you're just trying to help, and a lot of what you actually say in your edits is true, but I find it a bit of a peeve to change what the community as a whole has worked on together, just because you have other ideas or disagreements, without discussing it first.

Its not just you; everyone has to do this. If I want to rewrite an entire section, or describe something differently, I bring it up on the talk page to see what the other users would suggest and how the community feels about it, rather than just changing it and expecting everyone to keep it that way. This will keep your edits from getting further reverted. It all boils down to common courtesy. Thank you for your contributions. ~ Ten Tailed Fox 07:46, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Multiple Edits
Hi. If something like this happens in the future, rather than reverting one edit, you are well advised to contact a user who has rollback powers and they will be able to revert all instances of edits from the same user to the previous edit :) --Speysider Talk Page 12:06, August 4, 2013 (UTC)

re: naruto chakra
100% for sure? Good then--Elveonora (talk) 09:37, August 30, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Susanoo
I see. Well, personally I'm still against it (we didn't do it for Madara) but I won't fight against it. Do as you wish.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 13:08, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

Stabilised Susanoo
That might not be the same thing as the completely stabilized Susanoo, but a bi-product of using Susanoo with a tailed beast (a power of the Shinju)..... Madara and Sasuke both only used the completely stabilized form AFTER getting the Rinnegan...... it might be a product of the Shinju's (or sage's) power..... if they were able to stabalize it before they got the Rinnegan, then we could say it's a EMS power, but if it's only after they got the Rinnegan, can we really claim the same?--Deathmailrock (talk) 20:25, May 24, 2014 (UTC)

What's up?
lol.

Didn't realize you were over here too. How they hanging? --CyberianGinseng 23:18, June 28, 2014 (UTC)

black rods
Would you be so kind as to give your opinion on this? Thanks in advance--Elveonora (talk) 22:18, September 24, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Itachi "quelling" Enton...
Itachi stopped casting Amaterasu, he didn't put out the black flames on Sasuke. Putting them out is part of Kagutsuchi, a technique which Itachi doesn't possess. His left eye's technique is Tsukuyomi. • Seelentau 愛 議 23:11, October 23, 2014 (UTC)


 * Yeah, no, that's not even remotely true. If he just stop casting Amaterasu the fire would still be burning the remains. Instead | we SEE one minute Sasuke engulfed in flames and | the next moment the fire's out and the remains left smoldering with no fire. Zetsu also states he put the fire out to save the eyes. Nor can you explain why the other Amaterasu didn't go out when supposedly Itachi stop casting it. Unless you have a better translation and can explain better than you have how the fire went out without Itachi putting it out, while no other Amaterasu ever did similarly, you don't have a case.--CyberianGinseng 15:40, October 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * Don't know if this is directed at me, but... Zetsu said that Itachi stopped Amaterasu (gonna trust the translators for now, since I don't have access to the raws right now) and controlling the black flames - including putting them out - is something only Kagutsuchi can do. Itachi does not possess that technique, since his second technique is Tsukuyomi. • Seelentau 愛 議 20:14, October 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * SaiST already cleared up his position. In any case, I'm not going to belabor the point beyond this post, but I seriously disagree. Clearly, Itachi has this ability to stop Amaterasu as Zetsu's words clearly say that's what he did. He doesn't have to say how. We already know that simply not casting the jutsu does absolutely nothing to stop it once it starts to burn. It didn't stop it from burning the toad stomach Jiraiya summoned as Itachi was miles away running at high speed and certainly not casting anything. It didn't stop it from burning up part of the forest as Itachi was dead and not casting anything.


 * Once it's ablaze it burns until it completely eradicates its target and extinguishes if it doesn't come into contact with anything else before hand. Other than it would burn for seven days and nights in the case it does contact something not readily destructible, like the forest. Or it can be dispersed in the method Nagato and Naruto both used by pushing it off and dissipating it or giving it nothing to burn. Or it can be absorbed or sealed. Those are the only ways the manga/databooks have stated it can be stopped. Stopping its casting does absolutely nothing to put it out. We know this from many examples and Itachi had no other method than to simply cancel it.


 * Any jutsu can be canceled. I don't see how this is different than canceling another jutsu. Kagutsuchi is shape manipulation of the flames. It's ridiculous to think shape manipulation is required to cancel any jutsu. Naruto wouldn't have been able to ever cancel a jutsu without learning shape manipulation first.


 * That's about all I have to say on it so whatever. If you want the raw I can post it if you like.--CyberianGinseng 23:52, October 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * Well okay, that's your opinion. But the manga does not say that he put the flames out. The manga only says that he stopped casting it and since we don't have any more statements about that case, we can't just go and assume stuff. Besides that, the next databook is coming out soon and I'll write this case on my to do list. • Seelentau 愛 議 03:52, October 25, 2014 (UTC)