User talk:Omnibender

Re: Block
Fixed. Jacce | Talk 06:13, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 20:05, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 06:19, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 19:50, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 07:05, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 17:37, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 19:07, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 05:07, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 16:57, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 17:30, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:34, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 15:47, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 06:52, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 20:16, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:49, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 14:58, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 21:13, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:10, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 17:58, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 19:16, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 19:54, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 20:03, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 20:49, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 15:46, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 18:10, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 20:51, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 19:09, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 14:43, February 22, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:59, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:44, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 18:50, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 07:22, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 16:29, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 18:59, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:49, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 14:02, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 19:43, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 17:13, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 19:29, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 07:23, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 17:20, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 19:49, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 21:21, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 07:17, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:27, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 15:15, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 18:30, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 15:22, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 19:54, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:53, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 14:40, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 16:17, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 06:54, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 14:55, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 17:53, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

I fixed the IP, but I couldn't see a reason for the other. Jacce | Talk 18:19, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 17:45, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 19:52, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 07:21, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 19:37, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:54, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked some, warned some. Jacce | Talk 15:16, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 17:26, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:26, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 17:32, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 21:23, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 07:14, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 12:43, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 20:01, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 14:32, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 17:03, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 18:02, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 19:41, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 21:03, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 15:22, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 18:56, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 19:58, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 20:50, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 18:40, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 12:34, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 04:19, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

I think I got all. Had some problem with the net so it took some time. Jacce | Talk 17:39, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 20:15, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 04:37, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 18:29, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 18:36, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 05:50, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 18:37, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 04:18, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 19:55, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:25, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 16:29, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 22:52, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 08:35, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 20:11, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 04:59, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:19, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 06:54, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 18:29, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 04:59, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 20:55, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:32, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 15:21, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 08:18, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 15:56, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 16:59, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 17:02, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 20:37, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:36, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 17:41, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 18:39, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 20:02, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:40, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:49, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 15:31, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:09, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:02, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 16:39, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:25, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:42, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:11, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 09:12, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:27, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:29, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 21:51, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:36, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:45, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:58, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:34, April 12, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:01, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:43, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:00, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:42, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:58, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:18, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:03, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. I think it is a sign of the spring. The snow melts, birds returns and vandals gather at Narutopedia. ;) Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:41, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:55, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:07, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:01, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 18:20, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:48, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 15:45, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:32, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:12, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 18:28, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:22, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:04, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 21:35, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:54, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 15:40, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 18:23, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:29, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:57, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:54, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:45, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:46, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:25, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:56, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:56, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:56, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:27, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:15, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:10, May 8, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:14, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:35, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 21:03, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:46, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:57, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:42, May 12, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:59, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:27, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:30, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:59, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 16:23, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:40, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:48, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 18:33, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:04, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:46, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:29, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:00, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:43, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 13:39, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:36, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 16:30, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:07, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:26, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:15, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:16, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:20, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:03, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:53, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:31, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:45, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:25, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Protect
Fixed. Jacce | Talk 16:19, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

I have protected all I could think of. Did I miss any? Jacce | Talk 19:59, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

New Narutopedia:Spoiler policy, spoilers go into the pages on Thursdays. Jacce | Talk 07:22, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

(Spoilers): I guess that, just didn't want you to think I ignored you. :) (Six-tails) Protected. Jacce | Talk 16:29, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 16:21, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

I haven't seen the spoilers, but I take your word for it. Jacce | Talk 18:18, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Protected. Jacce | Talk 17:45, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 07:21, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Protected. Jacce | Talk 06:54, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

I think I got them all. Jacce | Talk 17:52, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

I have asked Dantman. Jacce | Talk 12:34, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

I used auto confirmed since Snapper2 got tied of lifting the protections. So if spoiler shows up, the one who added it will be blocked. Jacce | Talk 18:18, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot about this part yesterday. Jacce | Talk 04:18, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

Protected. Jacce | Talk 06:54, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Lifted. Jacce | Talk 04:59, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Protected. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:04, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:54, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Protected. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:27, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:15, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Protected. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:10, May 8, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:46, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Protected. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:43, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:36, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Possible Bug
If you look here under S you will see it three times. The problem is not with the infobox, its with the data that its receiving. Simant (talk) 22:09, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

images.
In the yondaime page could u move the image of team minato over to the left it looks more proper that way and why arew u removing the image of team jiraiya from his page. It is important enough to be there. User/Talk:Me1

Madara Uchiha page
Madara was the actual creator of the Akatsuki. Can we agree to put creator and not just co-founder? Axel Carnage (talk) 01:35, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

The Akatsuki page states Madara is the founder, which is the creator. Also, Pain stated he was the founder because he didn't want to give away Madara's position at the time; Pain was more of a leader and Madara is more of a founder/creator and current leader. Axel Carnage (talk) 01:46, February 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * Just want to point out: We have no reason to believe he was lying to cover for Madara. Hell someone of Pain's level probably wouldn't have to lie. Regardless is regardless, they both referred to themselves as Akatsuki's creators.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 01:52, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

If Madara hadn't created Akatsuki, how else do you think he went from Tobi (an Akatsuki recruit who was basically a total joke) to giving orders to the "leader" in secret? Do you guys think a creator would take orders from just a co-founder? As well as Akatsuki has been around for a while and Nagato can't be more than 25 years old meaning he'd have to be in the teens when he created it and considering we saw him when he was training with Jiraiya, unless a teenager created Akatsuki in secret without Jiraiya knowing, that wouldn't be the case. In summary, Madara Uchiha is the creator/founder/benefactor/mastermind/whatever of Akatsuki. Pain/Nagato is just leader and perhaps considered a co-founder. If you believe otherwise....dunno what to say. Axel Carnage (talk) 04:09, February 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * Because he was the brain. Two people can make an organization, but if one is clearly smarter than the other, then that one can easily be the one to call the shots.
 * Yes. That happens.
 * As far as can be gathered, Akatsuki is not that old. It at the very least is no older than twelve years old, as Madara wasn't wearing his Akatsuki robe when he met Itachi. That being said, both this and what you said are speculative.
 * It's obvious Akatsuki was created after Jiraiya left, and after Yahiko died and Nagato became Pain.
 * In summary, Madara was the mastermind (that we do know), Pain was the leader of the organization. They both said they founded the organization. So until we get a clear example instead of random hearsay, both founded Akatsuki and thus co-founders.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 04:20, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Some of the ignorance of this wikipedia is beyond understanding. You still say that a 15 or 16 year old created Akatsuki and all the members took orders from that teenager or that Madara met a 15 or 16 year old boy and asked him to create the most powerful evil organization in the Narutoverse.

Need more proof? A (the Fourth Raikage) stated Akatsuki originated from Kirigakure which was where Madara was once Mizukage. (Hey, that sounds more logical than a 15 year old creating it).

We have also seen Nagato in his fight against Hanzo when he was about 17 - 20 years old. If Akatsuki was around 12 years old, that would have to mean it was already created at that time and considering Akatsuki wasn't created until after Nagato synced with Gedo Mazo, he couldn't have created it.

You people really need to think outside the box sometimes, not just always rely on cold hard facts. And if you must insist on relying on them, there is much more evidence that Madara created Akatsuki first, got all the members recruited, then hid in the shadows, than Nagato creating everything first. That's not to say he isn't a co-founder. Madara is the official creator with this evidence. Axel Carnage (talk) 04:39, February 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * I said, what I said was speculative. I don't know when Akatsuki was made, but I can assume it was no older than 12 years old.
 * Pain is not a teenager, he was a teenager during the Second Great Shinobi World War. He was an adult by the time Akatsuki (again in theory) was made.
 * If you mean Madara is a teenage, then my friend you are way off. His age is unknown, but he was a man when the Third Hokage was a boy. Dude is clearly up there in years.
 * The Raikage said that Akatsuki originated in Kiri. Yes. We do not know however when. We do not know how long Madara was control.
 * Yahiko was about the same age as the rest of his team when he died, around 25-30 years of age (or within that age of each other. Only the Deva Path of Pain was given an age, approximately 25-30. Both Nagato and Konan was not.) We do not know how much time passed between Yahiko's death and the rise of Pain, but we do know Akatsuki was made after it. I'm not quite sure what you mean about the Gedo Mazo statue.
 * I do think outside the box. I just know what is speculatorygabble and what is facts based on what we actually know. What we do know is both Madara and Pain said they created Akatsuki. We know that much.
 * Can we please stop talking about this on Omnibender's page and move it to one of our Talk Pages. I am really sorry about this Omnibender, feel free the archive this as soon as possible >.>--TheUltimate3 (talk) 04:53, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Spoilers
We have a new policy. Jacce | Talk 19:48, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Spoilers
Oh... didn't know. Sorry. --Gojita (talk) 13:31, February 25, 2010 (UTC)Gojita

RE: Byakugan seal
That's why I tried to compromise with a different write up. It's a combination of your and my previous one.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 03:41, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * No prob, just glad we could settle this before the page was locked.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 03:43, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Crystal seal
Man, I said it to SuperN before... that's not the Bird seal. It's an unknown special seal. Just see in epi 104 when Guren uses this jutsu and pause in the right moment. --Rubião March 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, so I will list it as "unknown seal", ok? --Rubião March 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, this case is closed XD --Rubião March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Third Databook Translations
I would appreciate any help and comments on my translations. I try to keep the formatting as close to the formatting used in the databook as I can, without losing legibility. The formatting of the non-jutsu articles is a bit difficult to explain, though. It isn't really as consistent. --ShounenSuki (talk 16:22, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Spoiler Warning
Yeah. I have no idea how to do that.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 02:08, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Summoning or Reverse Summoning?
Too be honest, I have absolutely no idea what the exact difference is between the normal and reverse summonings, if there even is one.

All I can tell is that when a frog summons a human to Mt. Myōboku, it's Reverse Summoning. If Shima only said Summoning Technique, instead of Reverse Summoning Technique, then I'd say she did the normal one. --ShounenSuki (talk 21:13, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Checking Image Policy
Sorry I didn't realize that there was a policy for images, I hope I didn't cause much trouble and thanks for letting me know.It wont happen again.

Punctuation
To butt in on TheUltimate's talk page: I use "British" punctuation. Since I have had a hand in writing or re-writing many articles, ". and ", show up in a number of locations. The wiki has no official preference, but the frequent switch from British to American (and not vice versa) shows where the masses want punctuation to be. ~SnapperTo 17:41, April 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * When you get right down to it, this is a fansite. It's probably asking too much that people use punctuation at all, let alone a style of punctuation that most grammar classes will tell you is wrong. ~SnapperTo 17:57, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Shippūden Movie 4
I'd say it is. There's plenty of information. --ShounenSuki (talk 21:03, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Uchicha clan
It is said by Kakashi that the members of the Uchicha clan all have anffinity to fire so shouldnt we put it i their info box(and im sory if the spelling is bad)

Hi
This is YJutsuSage who just edited Kunai, Book of Gelel and Black Hole and made an account so hi

Something is bothering me
I just wanted to say that when they were decodeing Jiraya's message they noticed that his ta(dont know how it goes i Jap.)looks like a 9.Then that girl showed how he wrote it not the right way but slopy as the called it http://www.onemanga.com/Naruto/407/06/ but in the anime Shikamaru did that should we put that in the info for anime manga differences

Minato's Speed
prove where Minato showed instantaneous reflexes and raw quickness. people just assume because of the flying thunder god technique.

RE: New Sexy Technique
Ah then let me change my report to the fact that it has its appearances in the manga and anime. It should be specifically listed as a Fanbook only appearance in the side box. It's misleading and inaccurate if it doesn't say that. I know it says in the main summary of it that it's in the Fanbook but for those of us that like to browse, it makes it sound like it actually appears in the manga and anime is what I'm trying to say. So, I think, that those two fields in the information box should be blank. Maybe a slot for Fanbook appearances and pages?

--ButaUri (talk) 00:44, April 18, 2010 (UTC)ButaUri

you
you are cool

Re: Inheritors of the Will of Fire
No, I haven't seen it. The spoiler policy doesn't mention subs being needed when adding anime info, but that might be due to they been subbed quicker. You could try to bring the matter up on the movies talk page. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:31, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Yes thanks. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:48, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I watch it as soon as I get time over. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 15:13, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Jutsu infobox
That is because the movie/game debut fields are only suppose to be used when they have not debuted in anime/manga. People have just been misusing it. - S im A nt 23:08, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Inheritors of the Will of Fire
Sure, I would love to. --GoDai (talk) 01:30, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! --GoDai (talk) 01:34, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

adavance nature page
Didn't you have an advanced nature page full on ones you thought possible like wave release and stuff, can you link me to it.Saimaroimaru (talk) 19:37, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Hiruko's ball technique
I think might be a variation of Dark Release: Inhaling Maw.--Deva 27 (talk) 00:47, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

I don't know, but it was most likly a dark release move. Also other techniques like Chidori have had different sets of hand seals--Deva 27 (talk) 00:54, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

I think would be okay since the two moves look different.--Deva 27 (talk) 00:56, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Image Policy
I still don't understand which images have "proper licenses and rationales". I mean i upload 3 pictures from the same episode/movie and only 1 of them is deleted for not having "proper licenses and rationales" (i dont speak english well and i can't fully understand what that means)--Znake2 (talk) 17:27, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. Ill try to fix my images :)--Znake2 (talk) 17:36, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Kanji
do you have the japanese signs vor ichis dual headed snakes and his snake web?Ernie1992 (talk) 19:09, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

yeah i know, but i cant any japanese i tried to find hte kanji wiht online translator and i only found out jasenshi complete and dakoumou there is one kanji left, but that kuchiyose thing i doont find anythingErnie1992 (talk) 20:17, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

yeah but this time it does not so, i dont know if i make anywhere a mistake, but i cant find the kanjis, and i dont know why but the kanjis from the kuchiyose part in the movie arent the same as in the wiki mmhErnie1992 (talk) 20:44, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Invasion of Konoha
Um omnibender, orochimaru never summoned a snake during the invasion of konoha. Sand nin did.

Storm Release
You could be right, but all bird seals I have seen didn't have any fingers together. The seal usually is with index and ring down but not together, middle and little up together. Just watch when Sarutobi actives the DD Consuming Seal or when Kakashi uses Chidori. --Rubião April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Kekkei genkai ninja from Inheritors of the Will of Fire
The movie shows each of them at least twice, the second time being the most clear. shouldn't we have pages such as "Unnamed Sunagakure kekkei genkai user" for the guy in the green light, since he had the headband? --GoDai (talk) 21:18, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Incomplete name
奥 means interior or inside, 義 has many meanings, including teachings. 奥義 refers to something taught only within a special group, so the best translation would be secret technique. --ShounenSuki (talk 17:50, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Block
I know the fact that we have different philosophies on what to do with sysop privileges is why you don't ask me to block/protect. However, I feel I need to ask what exactly your definition of a blocakble offense is. While I can understand 75% of your requests, I see such things as: Were these all examples of undesirable edits? Yes, but all were well-intentioned. Trying to make productive contributions to the wiki is not a crime. ~SnapperTo 23:58, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * someone who doesn't understand how to edit a wiki.
 * someone removing questionable/not commonly known information.
 * someone who is merely misinformed.
 * someone who is laughably out of date.
 * someone who, as far as they know, is correct.


 * Jacce only seems to give warnings to registered users, and follows your advice to block in every other case. If you do not believe someone deserves to be blocked, even if there was a block for a comparable reason in the past, I ask that you not request they be blocked. ~SnapperTo 00:29, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Jutsu classification
I would have to say.. that is completely redundant since all chakra natures are the result of nature transformation. - S im A nt 00:41, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Shikamaru protecting Kurenai pic
Please don't eliminate that pic, is not unnecesary. It shows Shikamaru's bond with Asuma's legacy and also Kurenai's pregnancy.

Re:Re:Infobox
Thanks for telling me, I did it and it works now. - WhiteArmor - (Talk) - 22:35, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Sealing Jutsu
Okay, I agree that it's possible that this isn't the same technique, but do you think it should still be called the "Tailed Beast Sealing Jutsu"? it hasn't been confirmed that he's the only user (but it hasn't been confirmed that he isn't the only one either). - WhiteArmor - (Talk) - 23:12, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Wait, before you respond, Deva 27 just changed it to "Sealing Pot Technique", I think we can all agree on this. - WhiteArmor - (Talk) - 23:13, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Congrats?
What do you exactly mean with that? xD--Kind-Hearted-One (talk) 22:52, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Killer Bee: Kenjutsu
Is that Killer Bee: Kenjutsu: 'that's speculation' about that information about his swords I put down (I do not know if it was you or someone earlier who removed it, if it is not you, my apologies), since I can tell you it was not speculation. I can even cite it from books. The shape of his swords is that of thrusting blade, and the fact that he has no hilt demonstrates a strong need for little weight since it does add a bit to it since it needs to be strong enough to stop other swords. The lack of a hilt also (like Sasuke) shows that he does not feel the need to defend himself due to his chakra flow.

As for the length of the blades themselves, if you have the ability to cut through anything then a longer blade would be more reasonable since wtih length you gain reach but less balance, but you could cut through the enemies defenses; even if you are worried about parries one could easily still have a longer blade. His are short and light though. Also, look at how thin they are and how easily Suigitsu broke that one. Those are not strong blades, so they must be for both his stance to be easily thrown.--Thomas Finlayson (talk) 4:34, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Huh, fine. Though I have to question that we should not apply observations from our own lives. --Thomas Finlayson (talk) 4:45, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Chidori Current Range
Does this look short? And via the databook (yes, I know, irony) this can only be that jutsu) --Thomas Finlayson (talk) 5:09, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

What about Earth Release: Earth Flow Rampart, does this look like 0-10m? --Thomas Finlayson (talk) 11:34, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Scratch what I said earlier. I got a tape measure and this is AT LEAST 10m long. Thus I am thinking of putting that in the trivia. Plus, Chidori Sharp Spear is too long for 5m as well. When it is used here and here it also passes 5m. I admit at other times like when Sasuke catches Orochimaru in bed and here it is closer, but...in the name of accuracy I feel I should mention it on the trivia.
 * Since you are the first to do this, with Iron Sand World Order I thought I would ask you for your advice first. --Thomas Finlayson (talk) 3:43, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Already started with talk: Chidori Sharp Spear. --Thomas Finlayson (talk) 3:46, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

Strange
Check out the Sasuke Uchiha page and look at his weapons. Maybe i am crazy but does it say Fuma Shuriken...? I do not know how to edit that so can you take that out for me, Thanks. Kagutsuchi100 (talk) 01:46, May 17, 2010 (UTC)Kagutsuchi100

Uploads
Can you tell me on which picture do you exactly thing...?So i won't upload pictures like that one! ომɾἶʝმ մƈհἶհმ (talk) 13:45, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

I know that the picture whit Jiraiya's sealing techniques is small, but i couldn't fine bigger...so if i found some better , i'll change it !!! :D ომɾἶʝმ մƈհἶհმ (talk) 17:19, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

I found bigger picture ! You can check it out! :D ომɾἶʝმ մƈհἶհმ (talk) 17:37, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Hinata
Who tried to remove what from Hinata's trivia?

Jiraiya's Unusual Summoning
1) Catch more attention and more discussion this way, and they are both relevant (i.e. someone interested in Jiraiya may not necessarily be as interested in summoning but can still contribute; and vise versa)

2) I thought it was forbidden to delete information from talk pages. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 23:06, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Good idea! Thanks. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 23:12, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

How Lightning Release is strong against Earth jutsu
Could you go to Talk:Lightning release and look at the bottom two sections? After all, this is a tad similiar to Iron Sand World Order, and I thought it best to help explain this. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 22:16, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Elements and Recomposition
I have been thinking, and this is another theory, which may have many problems, but maybe you could help. This is it: There are 2 types of elemental recomposition: Opposite and Adjacent. And that's all I have so far, but I especially believe that Sasuke's new element Blaze is somehow related to the two natures he was able to learn at such a young age, and I was mainly motivated by Yamato's lesson, where he showed Fire→Wind→Lightning, which means Naruto and Sasuke are, also in this way, opposites (Wind←→Blaze in my theory). --GoDai (talk) 03:48, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Opposite recomposition includes Ice, Lava, Storm, and Dust, where the elements being recomposed both have a relationship with another element, one superior and the other inferior (e.g. Water → Fire → Wind; Water + Wind = Ice, so Ice is the opposite of Fire, because the Fire chakra will be strong against the Wind component of Ice chakra, but weak to the Water component). This type of recomposition produces an element that is an "opposite" of a basic element. By my theory, Ice is the opposite of Fire, Lava is the opposite of Water, Storm is the opposite of Earth, and Dust is the opposite of Lightning.
 * (Water→Fire→Wind)In Sasuke's fight with Haku, Haku stated Sasuke could not melt his Ice with a C-rank Fire technique, which could show how Fire and Ice are equally opposed, and one can defeat the other only by level of skill.
 * (Earth→Water→Fire)Rōshi's Lava could be cooled and extinguished by Kisame's Water, although Kisame also complained about the difficulty, possibly saying their powers were matched.
 * (Lightning→Earth→Water)Storm is energy-based, while Earth is matter-based. The former also represents "Heaven", while the latter represents "Earth".
 * (Wind→Lightning→Earth) Dust is matter-based, while Lightning is energy-based. In comparison, both involve the breakdown of matter.
 * (Fire→Wind→Lightning) THEORY: If Sasuke's new element Blaze is Fire+Lightning, Naruto's Wind chakra will be the only equal counter to it. This was inspired when Yamato explains elemental relationships, about how Naruto's Wind cannot defeat Sasuke's Fire Release techniques, but can defeat his Chidori, and Naruto talked about how he was the only person that could be the one to oppose Sasuke equally.
 * Adjacent recomposition includes Wood and Boil, which is a case where elements that may affect each other in relationships outside of recomposition (Earth → Water, and Water → Fire). In such a recomposition, the inferior element must (symbolically) overcome the superior one with "skill"(e.g. Normally, Earth → Water, but Water can cause Wood to grow from the Earth, therefore breaking and dividing it). This is necessary to create balance between the superior and inferior elements.
 * (Water-Wood→Earth) Earth blocks, or absorbs, Water, but Water can cause Wood to grow in the Earth, causing the roots of the Tree to part and break into the Earth (This comes from the Chinese elements, which are also used in Japan and other Asian countries).
 * (Fire-Boil→Water) Water extinguishes Fire, but can cause Water to Boil in the process.
 * (Wind-Dark?→Fire) THEORY: Fire consumes Wind, but Wind can cause Fire to blow out, leaving only Darkness.
 * (Lightning-Swift?→Wind) THEORY: Wind dissipates Lightning, but Lightning is Faster, which allows it to strike before Wind.
 * (Earth-Steel?→Lightning) THEORY: Lightning pierces/breaks Earth, but the Electricity can be used to purify and refine Earth into Steel, a stronger material which conducts Electricity, and therefore immune, because it just lets it pass through itself.

Re: Bots
No, but there's an explanation of how to use them somewhere in ShounenSuki's talk page(s). Not that I see how useful a bot would be for any of those decisions. ~SnapperTo 19:12, May 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * I suppose since it took me 10 minutes to move them in the first place, I could take ten minutes to move them back. However, if you'll remember my reason for moving them, the releases and whatever else I moved are not proper nouns, so they should not be capitalized in article text. Therefore, a bot is not needed beyond correcting the target for the semantic lists. ~SnapperTo 19:23, May 29, 2010 (UTC)