User talk:DarioAD

Hello DarioAD, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the International Naruto page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- ShounenSuki (Talk) 22:35, 2010 December 29

Re: Delete
The "Naruto in Italy" only contained the Delete tag, so it was pretty much routine. "International Naruto" was deleted by Simant and Snapper2. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 10:35, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

You should wait for the others to answer first. Also, sign your posts with ~. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 11:07, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

If you look at the deletion summary for International Naruto, you'll find the quote of, "Here we will explore each countries that dubbed One Piece and how they get their jobs done." Obviously, talking about One Piece would not be useful for a Naruto wiki. In addition to that, I don't think "One Piece International" is a particularly good idea on the One Piece wiki, and it is unlikely to be much better on this wiki. ~SnapperTo 16:53, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

I deleted it because this is an english site, and translation to how other countries failed in dubbing is pointless since we have the original language listed already. S im A nt 19:08, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

I do not understand the question and/or statement. S im A nt 19:31, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

What is "publications' numbers" and what are you talking about with episodes? S im A nt 22:19, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * You aren't being very clear. Do you mean the release number, isbn, or what? S im A nt 17:50, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * I really honestly have no idea what you want to do, perhaps take it up with someone else? S im A nt 21:02, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Like I said, I think you should take it up with someone else, because I really don't see what you are trying to get across. Also, sign your comments with ~ and do not create a new section for each comment. S im A nt 22:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC)