User talk:Rachin123

Hello, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Tenten page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Omnibender (Talk) 01:42, 20 March 2013

Naruto's age
Because you don't seem to read edit summaries, here's it: stop changing Naruto's age. His birthday is tomorrow. Tomorrow has yet to come in the manga timeline. Insisting on changing that will result in a block. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:06, October 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Naruto's birthday says October 10th. How is it that the manga timeline is different? Anyway when would be the right time to edit Naruto's age? --Rachin123 (talk) 17:33, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * October 10 in-universe. Naruto said "tomorrow is my birthday", meaning that when tomorrow comes inside the story's universe, when characters acknowledge that the following day has begun, then his age will be changed. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:22, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks. Rachin123 (talk) 21:41, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Absolutely not. When the sun rises in the manga, that's when it becomes acceptable. Otherwise, no. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Yamagakure Symbol.svg 02:23, October 23, 2013 (UTC)

Recent images
The recent Sakura-related images you uploaded do not adhere to the Image policy here. And looking at your talk page, it would seem that this is the breaking point, as you have already been given a last warning. Rxd ( talk ) 00:46, October 24, 2013 (UTC)

Characters and arcs
When adding to a character's history section, please use the past tense and write about what is specific to the character. Your recent edits to Sakura and Sai's articles regarding anime-only arcs were written mostly in the present tense, and they describe the arc more generally, instead of the character's role in it. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:07, May 11, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Concerning Some Peoples Age
Naruto isn't listed as being 17, because he's not 17 yet. When Obito pointed out that the following day would be the day Kushina and Minato died, and Naruto pointed out that it would also be his birthday, it's very clear that it would only be the following day. Until the manga shows, says, or in any way acknowledges that that has arrived, it's still October 9th in-universe. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:44, May 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * Understood I'm sincerely sorry. Goodness Naruto age already!!! --Rachin123 (talk)
 * Something you should also take in consideration regarding ages: when a character shows up. By that, I mean the following: consider a Part I character, with a known age, that has showed up in Part II. The time-skip was two and a half years, but we're closer to a four year difference since Part I ended. Depending on when in Part II the character show up, their age difference between Parts I and II might not be the same as another character's who is also present in both parts. If a character didn't show up in early Part II, or if they only showed up in early Part I before appearing in Part II, they're likely to be more than two or three years older. When those uncertainties appear, avoid changing or filling in an age. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 03:21, May 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * So Sai is the same age as let's say Sakura, being 17? I thought he was a year older.
 * Sai's entry in the third databook introduces him as 17. Sakura's profile in the same databook introduced her at 16. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:35, May 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * So wouldn't that now make Said 18 now since Sakura is now 17? And Anko hasn't even been given a age in part 2. Why is that? --Rachin123 (talk)
 * Character age determination is a bit more complicated than that. Unless they mention something, it's a bit difficult to say how much time has passed. Sai and Sakura are probably 18 and 17 at the moment, they're easier to determine because they're often part of plot. Anko is a character that is in the situation I mentioned above. Her first appearance in Part II was after the third databook was published, we don't know much time passed exactly. Her Part II age could be either 27 or 28. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 18:49, May 13, 2014 (UTC)

Infobox heights
Inserting false information, as you're doing, will lead to a block. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 23:55, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * But Suigetsu is around the same height as Assume who is 5'5". But somehow he's 3 inches taller. I know that's not right. --Rachin123 (talk) 00:09, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Heights come from either databooks, or Studio Pierrot's settei sheets. If you're referring to how the infobox lists the height once you mouse over the value, that value isn't in feet and inches like 5'5", it's just in feet. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:25, June 17, 2014 (UTC)

Images
Please avoid uploading images as jpgs. Try uploading pngs instead, as they're generally better quality for the kind of stills taken from animation as we use. They're better quality, and the scale better. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:11, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^ This, again. Also, is there any reason that you are uploading such tiny images at all? We prefer high quality, high resolution PNG's as they are easier to display on the wiki. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:54, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * Please don't use absolute thumbnail sizes (eg |200px) when adding images to articles, nor make pointless edits to add underscores in spaces of a file's name: both are a violation of the Manual of Style policy. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 20:17, June 25, 2014 (UTC)

Renders
Please try harder find out where these full character depictions you're uploading are originally from. Because I don't want to keep doing it for you. I realize it's not always easy to find the source, but of the seven you've uploaded so far you've provided a source zero times. Ideally you would have given a source for at least one of them. ~SnapperTo 06:41, August 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh I'm sorry. I'll try to find the source. --Rachin123 (talk) 05:06, August 7, 2014 (UTC)

edits
you almost have 1,000 edits. congrats! Munchvtec (talk) 01:49, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Vandals
When encountering users like Spicybigdad, it is best to just report and ignore them. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:15, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Re: OVA Info For Konohamaru
Why are you telling me this for? I didn't put that on the article. All I did was fixed a grammar mistake and that's it.-- Ninja Sheik  23:58, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Oh I'm sorry. I'm gonna change it though. Rachin123 (talk) 00:02, September 19, 2014 (UTC)Rachin123

Picture request
There's a picture that is needed that would help the wiki a lot. In Naruto episode 126 there is a scene where kimimaro and the kaguya clan patriarch are fighting a few kiri shinobi mid-air. could you get this picture please. TY. Munchvtec (talk) 11:45, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

re: Blaze Release
That's like saying Storm Release: Laser Circus is Water and Lightning, but Storm Release is only Lightning--Elve Talk Page 18:52, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

Amaterasu is Blaze Release. That part about being Fire Release was either retconned or is half-true. Blaze Release being made of Fire + "unknown" still makes it possible for it to be highest level Fire Release. Black fire is still fire I guess--Elve Talk Page 19:28, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

Rinnegan
Sasuke's Rinnegan is stronger than Nagato's, his Rinnegan possesses all the abilities of a standard Rinnegan along with the Sharingan's abilities as well as Teleportation. But, in terms of skill Nagato is higher because Sasuke has only began to utilise the higher techniques of the Rinnegan.KiritoLevel96Alicization (talk) 23:33, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

Re: picture request
well it would be great if you could get the pic because it's needed for something important. thanks. Munchvtec (talk) 13:01, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

Violation of the Userpage policy
What's the problem now? What rule did I violate? Rachin123 (talk) 20:20, October 4, 2014 (UTC)Rachin123
 * Did you even read this notice? Clearly not if you have to ask that. --Sajuuk Talk Page 20:22, October 4, 2014 (UTC)

Really because I have ran into plenty of profiles who are fan made or personal but you come at me. People are crazy. Ill just delete everything on my user page to make you content even though its never that big a deal. Shake my head. Rachin123 (talk) 20:32, October 4, 2014 (UTC)Rachin123
 * Just because I haven't tagged or warned anyone else's profiles doesn't mean they're not violating a policy. I just happened to see you editing your profile, looked at it and noticed it violated policy. --Sajuuk Talk Page 20:36, October 4, 2014 (UTC)

Whatever. And its funny cuz I haven't edited my profile in like 2 weeks so I don't know where you get you saw name editing my profile mumbo jumbo. Carry on. Again I shake my head. Rachin123 (talk) 20:48, October 4, 2014 (UTC)Rachin123

Re: Deidara's Age
I know, I created a timeline. ;) But since his age wasn't given in the mini databook, we won't include it in the infobox. • Seelentau 愛 議 19:12, October 9, 2014 (UTC)

What mini databook? And come on though if we do this logically he'd be 18 at the start of the series. Why is it everyone wants to get everything from the creator when most of time the answer is right in your face. Oh and yoyr one of my candidates for the sysop position. Rachin123 (talk) 19:16, October 9, 2014 (UTC)Rachin123
 * The Book of Shō. And there's no need to discuss this. We don't add hypothetical ages. • Seelentau 愛 議 19:22, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * No, it doesn't. The infobox should only contain ages that were given by the manga or the databooks. • Seelentau 愛 議 19:42, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * Really cuz it says Neji was 16 in the beginning of Shippuden which seems right after two and a half years but according to the flawless databooks Team Guy was 17 in Shippuden. In their infoboxes it says well for Tenten and Neji cuz their birthday past they were 16-18. And please don't say that everything in the infobox comes from the databooks and or manga cuz some things are presumed or assumed. Rachin123 (talk) 19:50, October 9, 2014 (UTC)Rachin123
 * What do you actually want from me? • Seelentau 愛 議 19:53, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * Do it yourself please. • Seelentau 愛 議 20:07, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * No. • Seelentau 愛 議 20:15, October 9, 2014 (UTC)

The infobox should only display the earliest age given by the manga and the current age. Nothing in between, nothing calculated. • Seelentau 愛 議 20:34, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * But why? He was never stated to be 18. • Seelentau 愛 議 20:53, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * As I said, I created a timeline and I know the ages of the characters at every point in the manga. That's not the problem. The problem is that the infobox shows the ages given by the databook and not some theoretical age. • Seelentau 愛 議 21:10, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * The databooks show the age of the character in the timespan that is covered by the databook or until the character dies (during that timespan). • Seelentau 愛 議 21:53, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * You're not really good at explaining things. I still don't understand what your problem is. And no, the third databook ends with Sasuke awakening his Mangekyo Sharingan. • Seelentau 愛 議 22:14, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, he died as a 19 year old, that's true. So what you're saying is that since he debuted earlier and had a birthday since his debut, we should list his debut age too, right? Ah well, I see... then yes, indeed, we should add his age. • Seelentau 愛 議 22:47, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * Not before I didn't see what the other side has to say about this. The user who started the discussion made a point that I can't remember... there's a reason I was convinced not to add the "18", but I forgot why I was. • Seelentau 愛 議 23:02, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm gonna change it for the time being. Still thinking of who to vote for too lol. Rachin123 (talk) 23:07, October 9, 2014 (UTC)Rachin123

Re: Sai's taijutsu
Okay, you convinced me. Just re-upload the image with PNG format and add it in the taijutsu sub-article without adding any additional info because of the second sentence of Sai's clashing with Naruto. Thanks in advance. — Shakhmoot  (Talk) 21:38, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Discussion
I misunderstood nothing. You've brought up "Naruto being hopelessly in love with Sasuke" before. There's a reason why ItachiWasAHero said stop with it. Because you've done it multiple times before. And I decided not to say anything. My frustration with you is that you don't listen. I say "no pyramid quoting." Yet you question me and do it anyway. You call rules on the wiki you don't agree with "stupid." I would expect more maturity from you, especially since you call yourself neutral, but no. You've always had an attitude. I don't try to fight with you. I take preventative measures, and you always want to keep coming back. You always want to get the last word in. You feel you didn't do wrong. However, others do. You don't see things as a big deal. But others do. It's not about how you feel. It's about how others feel about you. This is a community wiki. But you don't see it that way. That is why I'm at the limit of my patience. To be quite honest, I should have put you on block check months ago. And some agree you need to take a break. But I haven't put you there, because I feel every user should have warnings and chances. You've had plenty. • WindStar7125     03:26, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not talking about just the shipping thing. That's irrelevant. Over time, through multiple occurrences, you've had an attitude problem that many users have complained to me about (in the chat). Yet you believe you don't have a problem. So why is it that many other users do? I've decided not to take any action on you. You need to cool off, and I advise you don't respond on my talkpage with a long paragraph again. Because like I said, I'm not fighting with you. I could just put you on block check and be done with it. But I don't. I don't know why I don't, but it is what it is. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 03:38, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * Never said I wanted to block you. In fact, I can't block you. I don't have that privilege. I said I should have put you on block check, meaning someone else could have handled it. But I'm tired of having users complain of you to me. And please, don't respond to me on my talkpage after this. I'm very busy right now. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 03:56, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * You seem to care. We're fine. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 02:24, November 2, 2014 (UTC)

RE: Annoyance
I get it. It's very rude and bullish, and it shouldn't be accepted by anyone. Oh, well, at least the manga is finally over and I can leave it all behind now we've had that awful ending.--Reliops (talk) 20:16, November 5, 2014 (UTC)