Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-33068632-20180401065752/@comment-26636534-20180419215544

LoneNinja wrote:

So most of you like to make up opinions instead of going by facts? You can go by feats as much as you like, they're just as reliable as stats. Himawari's feat on Naruto is case and point. I've given you enough wiggle room, all I asked for was proof the statement is wrong, you can't give any. And that's fine by me.

A couple of things:

A) Feats = manga and manga trumps everything. If Kishi writes something new or retcons something, it would be in the manga.

B) Is Himawari's 'feat' canon now? Although I would have to add, the 'feat' in question is not combat, so please don't say it is.

C) Finally, I see this quite often in versus threads and it baffles me that users still don't know this. Statements are statements, they are not feats nor are they proof. A statement needs to be proven for all cases to become true. No one has to disprove a statement, you have to prove it for it to mean more.

As for this thread, Kakashi without Sharingan limits him quite a bit. More importantly, it limits his core fighting style. Which makes this thread quite unfair and one sided. Coupled with the fact that Part 1 Sharingan-less Kakashi doesn't exist, I don't see the point to this thread.