User talk:Simant

Re: Jutsu Infobox
Shrug/ the field exists for a reason right?..--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 18:39, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, ya maybe...But well it will inform ppl, which name which we r going by, our structure, etc...And i still think dantman created the field for a reason...And evn in the older format we had it that way..Literal meaning→Kanji→Romanji→eng tv, Viz, etc...--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 18:43, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Umm...I'm not that good with references because I save those references for you just you reedit again. Kunoichi101 (talk) 03:34, October 3, 2009 (UTC)Kunoichi101Kunoichi101 (talk) 03:34, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Well, I was doing that, because 'Six Paths of Pain' and 'Deva Path' are listed as jutsu, not as characters. So if someone goes to deva path, and wants to see HIS jutsu he used in the series under his infobox, they will be able to. same with six paths of pain. that make more sense and sound good? or would u rather me revert?--SkyFlicker (talk) 16:55, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

That was for the same reason as well, so users can better see and sort jutsu that are related to the 6 paths of pain, and not to nagato himself. Im basically 'tree'ing it, so that once the parent/child stuff takes effect, it will be easier for people to navigate. Sound good? Or still want just 'Deva Path'?--SkyFlicker (talk) 17:00, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

As I just wrote on his... once this feature of parent/child comes into effect, the 'users' field isnt going to allow the jutsu to be nested correctly. since all of the paths are individually considered jutsu, and the 6 paths are considered jutsu, they need to be nested as jutsu in the 'parent jutsu' field, with 'nagato' being the 'user'--SkyFlicker (talk) 17:06, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Does 'media' need to be filled out for all infoboxes? because if you put 'anime episode xx', seems like people would know it was anime?--SkyFlicker (talk) 19:17, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing--SkyFlicker (talk) 19:21, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Am I aggrevatin you yet? lol--SkyFlicker (talk) 19:45, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Just trying to help, lol. Goin through them fairly fast, so may miss some stuff--SkyFlicker (talk) 19:56, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Nah, im finding a lot, just goin down the list alphabetically--SkyFlicker (talk) 20:06, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing--SkyFlicker (talk) 20:39, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry -_-'. I will from now on ^_^.--NejiByakugan360 17:06, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

Re: That thingy about the picture
Oh! I didn't notice that. My bad :3 ~Hakinu (talk 21:46, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Delete Tags
Please understand, that I'm not playing here, I'm not entertaining by putting one deletion tag, not 2001 tags. I suggest, that you don't accuse me that I "like putting delete tags up for no reason", like you wrote. Please, read explanations for this. Thank you for understanding. --Tserg (talk) 21:59, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, looks like I've accidentally copied the delete tag. I've been copying different tags to my TextEdit so I won't search for them again. And my internet have some technical problems; i'm sorry. Anyway 2 deletion tags are not 2002 :) --Tserg (talk) 22:06, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Missing image
I'll let that wait till the character infobox. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Oct 4, 2009 @ 01:37 (UTC)

Yeah. I got that. Kunoichi101 (talk) 02:44, October 4, 2009 (UTC)Kunoichi101Kunoichi101 (talk) 02:44, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Flame Rasengan
I was just fixing this edit. I have no special opinion on it. ~SnapperTo 18:07, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

Reply
Well, sorry about that... Kunoichi101 (talk) 01:45, October 6, 2009 (UTC)Kunoichi101Kunoichi101 (talk) 01:45, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

Hanzo
Hum... I can know what makes you say that ? It's one of Hanzo primary element as used against the Sannin and also against the Ame Orphan. And this character will not appear again in the manga and the only techniques he showed us this element. And also, Hanzo states in Chapter 447 that his technique is a Katon. Itachou (talk) 21:52, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

Image captions
Simant, the infobox already has the ability to do captions. There is actually a reason why the Image param uses a multi-line textbox rather than something simple. The image param accepts multiple images each on it's own line, you can override the default image size by placing a size after a : and you can give the image a caption by putting one after a ;. See it's use on w:c:souleater:Shadow☆Star. So the infobox basically supports multiple images in the same infobox, each with it's own optional custom size and caption. Much more flexible than extra infobox fields. Course most of the time these are not needed, it's better to avoid them if you don't have a reason to use them. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Oct 9, 2009 @ 09:51 (UTC)

Re: Spoiler Warning message
No, I don't know for what screwed up reason MediaWiki is outputting edit mode for wgAction when on special pages. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Oct 11, 2009 @ 02:30 (UTC)

Re: Advanced Elemental Diagram
The link doesn't work. --ShounenSuki (talk 19:35, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * May I ask why you changed the colours of several of the elements? --ShounenSuki (talk 23:26, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Jutsu media
That's a very ugly way to do things. Pretending that a setting is set, when really it isn't, that just leads to a host of troubles. I was planning on doing something similar, but rather than that the plan was to tag the pages for maintenance. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Oct 13, 2009 @ 02:15 (UTC)

Re: Anime Only Arcs
Just a little comment: Maybe you should uniformize the list, so that the single-episode arcs are listed as
 * Episode [Number]? ~Hakinu (talk 05:34, October 13, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Arcs
The bulleted lines don't stick out much. ~SnapperTo 05:35, October 13, 2009 (UTC)


 * You could do something with Naruto Uzumaki/Filler Arc. ~SnapperTo 17:26, October 13, 2009 (UTC)


 * Move it to Naruto: Original arcs? Then you'd treat it like all the other arc articles. ~SnapperTo 17:57, October 13, 2009 (UTC)