Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-33068632-20180401065752/@comment-26107879-20180419230636

@Raichin

And the difference between Neji's and Himawari's Gentle Fist minus Neji's obvious superiority?

I'd also like to add that it's mind blowing you think CM2 makes someone Jonin Level at all when mere Genin took on CM2 and came out on top. Or that you downplay Kakashi and say go by feats only when he's only had two real fights, Zabuza and Itachi, both which could kill CM2 Sasuke with their abilities. By your method Sakura is better than Kakashi cause even she has more feats. So your method just doesn't work. A statement is just as right as a feat. It is right until proven wrong. And you have not proven it wrong. You just keep saying feats or it's not true. Like, lol. Are you the writer? Who are you to say that Kishimoto's statements are bull? No. I'll just use your logic against you, give me feats that prove Sasuke is Jonin level. Or Naruto. P.s. Two extra Raikiri's aren't a massive boost, quit exaggerating two extra usages.

@Ninja of War

A) There is no feat to discredit the statement, so I don't see your point.

B) It is indeed Canon the moment Kishmoto authored it in the "The Day Naruto Became Hokage" in Zai No Sho. And it is indeed a feat since Naruto took her seriously since he sensed the Killing Intent. It's not like he thought she was playing around. The point of the matter is, she one hitted him, but he as a kid could survive multiple hits from Neji. This proves that feats can be as unreliable and can contradict each other.

C) I have to disagree with you. If it comes from the author it's right until proven wrong. The writer exceeds anyone's belief or word. The writer does not have to prove himself, he made the series. It baffles me that you or anyone thinks you have a say over the writer and say he is wrong until proven right. No, he is right until proven wrong, cause again, this is his story. He makes the rules. Everything from the moon in the sky, to grass in the fields. He made it. He made these feats that you abide by. So his statements are just as reliable as anything else given by him. Because it all comes from the same person. It's your job to prove him wrong, not mine to prove him right. No one has the right to nitpick his series and choose what to believe is true and it to be fact.

I agree with your last statement.