User talk:Omnibender

Re: Sand Siblings ougi
I'd actually name it Shakunetsu — Sabaku Kyū, translating it to Scorching Heat — Sand Binding Coffin, simply because Gaara puts a pause in there, doesn't he? Seelentau 愛議 09:27, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Because when written as Kanji, I'd rather write it as 灼熱　砂縛柩. I mean, it's not a Shakutonjutsu, huh? :D Seelentau 愛議 17:37, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Dunno, I can't read Japanese without Furigana. :/ Seelentau 愛議 18:37, April 7, 2014 (UTC)

Re: with annonation
Its very weird and I'm unsure of what might be causing it. Try asking Simant..~Ultimate Supreme  06:46, April 8, 2014 (UTC)

Shadow The Demon
i read the rules but i dont understand... what am i doing wrong? nvm im sorry that i have dont this talkpage message Shadow The Demon (talk) 20:08, April 8, 2014 (UTC)Shadow The DemonShadow The Demon (talk) 20:08, April 8, 2014 (UTC)

Editing
I remember when wikia was all about facts. why is ok for you guys to turn your assumptions and opinions into facts but when someone else does, you revert their edits. Indra and Ashura's pages are the recents talked about pages, and Indra's page is at my best interest right now. I don't think its right to assume that Indra's spiral like eyes is his mangekyo sharingan, there hasn't been any manga giving scans and facts about Indra's eyes. I mean it he does have mangekyo sharingan and all of its abilities, but we don't know how his mangekyo pattern look like. --Ankhael (talk) 14:58, April 9, 2014 (UTC)

'''So you're bugged about Indra's eyes. Let me give guide you through. When we first shown Indra, in the manga, we were shown that he had the spiral eye. We listed that he had the spiral eye. Then the anime caught up, and showed that the eye was red. We didn't really do anything, because the Sage himself had been shown with red Rinnegan at some point close to that, so everyone just assumed art error by the anime team. We still listed his eye as a separate thing. Then, when we learned his name, we saw him with a basic, undeniable Sharingan. And in the very same chapter, we saw him using Susanoo. Well, every user of Susanoo so far, by definition, is a Mangekyō Sharingan user. Suddenly, that red depiction of the spiral eye makes sense'''

you telling me stuff I already know, as for the eye colors, thats the anime producers doing, that has nothing kishi's original manga disigns and writings.

'''Are you suggesting that Indra had MS and another, unspecified spiral dōjutsu? Do you honestly think that that is less speculative than saying that the unique design we saw in his eyes is his MS'''

no I am not suggesting anything, though that could be possible, but on contrary didn't it occur to you that that could be his rinnegan. however I am saying that we don't know if the spiral eyes is his mangekyo, we don't know what they are. wikia is not about speculation, and you my friend are speculating, we need to wait for manga giving facts. until then then the eyes should be kept a mystery.

'''The spiral eye being his MS is the only scenario in canon which successfully explains and goes with every other piece of available information regarding that topic. It's the least speculative thing to say. We don't have to be spoon-fed every single statement.'''

that giving scenario is not canon, that is your speculative conclusion. there shouldn't be any speculations in the articles at all, its ok to have theories but its not cool to put them into articles because other fans are going to want to start to do the same thing because you are doing it and its misleading fans that comes to this site that looks for canon source, narutopedia is for canon information. I do like your theory but we have to wait, you cant just put your speculation in an article and call it fact, its misleading without exact reference.

If next chapter they reveal that the spiral eye is something completely different, I'll go around the articles myself and update them, but until then, that's his MS. 

once again this site is about facts, when you put your speculation in the articles you are telling readers what you think not what the series stated and that is wrong, you are abusing the articles and your position on this site and you are wrong.

And don't puff your chest to say that we're the only ones saying this, there are threads in many Naruto boards saying the same thing.

if everyone started jumping off buildings would you do it? and don't put. --Ankhael (talk) 16:34, April 9, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Senju clan of the forest
I've heard that for the first time now. Seelentau 愛議 16:54, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * Huh? :x Seelentau 愛議 08:45, April 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, the "of the forest" part. The third databook just calls them "Clan with a thousand hands" or so. Seelentau 愛議 22:03, April 10, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Character number source
Perfect. Seelentau 愛議 08:45, April 10, 2014 (UTC)

About another user
I don't want to appear paranoid, but don't you think there are some similarities here to some other users who were partly blocked earlier? Especially with the focus on Karin's infobox. Noweeaboohoo (talk) 14:30, April 11, 2014 (UTC)

Alphasandwich
Hello. I saw that you put a Last Warning in that user's talkpage. Not to sound too full of myself, but I had already placed a warning regarding that image he had just recently uploaded. If these things weren't related, just ignore this post. Have a nice day.--JOA20 (talk) 19:10, April 11, 2014 (UTC)

Re: The video game jutsu articles
I have no issue with the game technique pages. The only reason I deleted those three created by the user I blocked was because they were entirely blank and I had no way of knowing if they were actual techniques from the games or some sort of fanon. As I recall, there was a user a day or two ago making fanon techniques and put them under the "game only" category, so I was just being cautious. Didn't want them to slip under the radar. I agree, though. A centralized page would probably be better in the long run. I have no particular beef with giving game techniques their own articles, but it does seem that several of them are really skimpy—the techniques, that is—so if we ever do find a way to centralize them to a single page, that may help the issue a bit. I apologize if my intervening stepped on some toes, I just didn't know if the content that user was creating was legit or not (given the blankness) and they had received three prior blocks and a plethora of warnings, so I thought it best to nip the situation in the butt before it got worse. ~ Ten Tailed Fox 20:37, April 11, 2014 (UTC)