Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-45510280-20200416210937/@comment-6769189-20200421195842

Ninja Of War wrote:

@Legion

Lol, I find it hilarious that you still feel the need to address me. Thanks for your concern. The record shows that you have unsupported statements about me and the points where you "tell me what my opinion/post must be", which I corrected you by saying what I really meant. So all I see is you @Legion having a misplaced sense of authority on what I should mean, instead of actually taking my clarified stance. I find it hilarious you still feel the need to address me. Acting like you are much better.

Ninja Of War wrote:

Ninja: ''I should have pointed out that the OP can decide for themselves and do their own research. And at no point did I try to "enforce authority", as the record shows I stated my opinion. So you claiming I was, is false, and my clarification shows I wasn't ignoring the novel statement." (L:-2: N:1) So after this long you admit to not telling the OP that they should do their own research and decide for themselves? You posted something like 18 times at it wasnt until about the 16th post that you mentioned the OP having the option to look at things differently. Admittedly i didnt catch that admission before because after you decided to keep score i just glanced over the post.

Lets take a look at the times you said what is or should be canon:

Ninja Of War wrote:

Well no, novels are the lowest form of canon, so anything in the manga or anime takes precedence. Using that we see, Itachi using Tsukuyomi on Kakashi where 1 second is stretched to 3 days of torture. So, practically speaking that would be the scale to use. But even then, Itachi's usage on Sasuke shows that time-dilation is not always applied to Tsukuyomi. Ninja Of War wrote:

Check the wiki's canon policy, canon is tiered. Furthermore, I found out that in Akatsuki:Hiden novel, Itachi himself comments that the effects of Tsukuyomi can be overcome with "love and willpower". Ninja Of War wrote:

The wiki doesn't decide that, it tiers canon based on association relative to the author. '''So the further removed from the author, the lower the canon tier is. The novels are not written my Kishimoto, therefore are the lowest form of canon.''' Ninja Of War wrote:

Again, users can't say novels mean just as much as manga, then cherry-pick statements they don't like. You can stop pretending that you havent been trying to tell people what is or should be canon.

Ninja Of War wrote:

Legion: So concerned that you ignored me stating what canon usually is and how i explicitly state constantly that canon and authorship have been blurred since NEP.

Ninja Of War wrote:

@Legion

I find it strange that you criticize me for using the canon policy and related definitions for canon, explaining my point of view with examples. While your latest post shows you defining canon and telling another user examples of contradictions between the various mediums, showing your point of view lol.

As shown, I merely pointed out your double standards of "criticism" against me and how I find it strange. But go on, try more falsehoods lol. It is a double standard to give the definition of canon and to explain what is usually canon? Apparently you dont understand the word usually, but its used to describe what is typical of something but is subject to variation.

It's a double standard to point out when Kishimoto explicitly stated that a nom-manga work was canon to his manga?

It's double standard to point out how Kishimoto (the sole author at that time) disregarded disregarded anime events in his story?

It's a double standard to say that the NEP has blurred the lines of authorship and canon?

You are stretching harder than Mr. Fantastic