Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-7292165-20160114211047/@comment-26506075-20160115090430

Rachin123 wrote: True they are not traditional weapons, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be considered as weapons when they act as such. But tell me something if a sword breaks do we not still consider it a weapon? Yes. Even if the jutsu bearing the weapon reverts it won't change that using thw jutsu, you create a weapon. Anything can be a weapon if it can be used to harm someone in this sense of it having a pysical form not like fire for example. In that, sense a nuclear weapon or any other explosive weapons cannot be treated  as a weapon.The physical form that we see is of it's container, just like the sheath of a sword, the real thing is inside of it.