Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-26403664-20160228225013/@comment-27660682-20160320071621

Because your argument is basically a stereotype with no evidence support ing it. All your evidence like the prime hiruzen thing plus gaara thing were either CLEAR retcons or a development of facts or a character who didn't have credibility. For example are we really gonna believe obito saying you need hashriama cells to use izanagi when it was shown that you don't? That was clearly either a retcon or character ignorance. Like I said, show me evidence that the yata mirror's abilities were retconned. Manga page and chapter. Otherwise denying capabilities is just pure bias with dime underlying motive.

@Tengen dbz logic is basically saying that if we haven't seen it tank a planet busting attack, then LOL it can't block the attack because we don't have the feat! The feat isn't necessary because the writer says that the shield adapts to the attributes of the attack, essentially playing copy cat, whether its a ninjutsu, physical attack, or ASTRAL body. If you wanted more feats then go back in time and aak Kishimoto to show more feats, because otherwise we don't have them. Hype is enough if it is given by a credible source andnwith an explanation. The shield turns back any attack so that's what it does. Saying the yata mirror isn't legit simply because you haven't seen it tank a planet busting attack is dbz logic.