User talk:Snapper2/Archive 11

Re:Spaces
OK, understood.--LeafShinobi (talk) 19:27, June 10, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Number redirects
Yeah, people can visit the List of Volumes page, but I don't see any link(s) on the main page to it, considering the importance of the mangas. Also, the 'list of volumes' article STILL doesn't show chapter 633; how do you expect an interested reader to visit that page? What happens when they see that they cannot reach it even by going to any of the neighbouring chapter articles? How do you find chapter 633?

I do agree with your points about "two episode 1s, two movie 1s, technically a couple video game 1s", so how about we create a disambig page for the numbers - providing links to the articles of the relevant chapter/episode/volume? — Alchez (talk) 09:02, June 15, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Fair use tagging
Ah yes, the licensing, I always get that wrong no matter what I choose. I uploaded a new image and used the "Fair use tv-screenshot". Is that okay?Norleon (talk) 22:50, June 23, 2013 (UTC)

May I say something
I envy you a lot.--White Flash (Contact) 18:26, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Rollback Q
Hi. I saw you left a message to Ten Tailed Fox and I was wondering: would the reverting of good faith edits for no reason using rollback be considered an abuse of the rollback privilege ? --Speysider Talk Page 18:21, July 20, 2013 (UTC)


 * There was a reason for that. The reason was I didn't see the undo button. For some reason it wouldn't show up for me, its a problem I've been having on at least two of the wikis I contribute to lately (sometimes it pops up like it should, and others it doesn't; I don't know what the issue is), so I couldn't leave edit summaries. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Yamagakure Symbol.svg 18:33, July 20, 2013 (UTC)


 * @Snapper2: Yeah, just that sometimes people forget to undo and just jump to rollback instead because it's quicker, not realising that abuse = loss of the power. So if someone just kept using rollback for no apparent reason without any consideration to leaving a reason on the users talkpage or ignoring the Undo function, they'd eventually lose that power ?
 * @TTF: Then the proper course of action is to just go to the talkpage of the user with a reason ? --Speysider Talk Page 18:35, July 20, 2013 (UTC)


 * Speysider, if you'd look, at the time of the rollback, I was either on a talk page (I believe the instances you refer to, I was on the articles actual talk page) talking about it, or I actually did go to the user's talk page. In fact, in the case Snapper was referring to on my talk page, where I forgot to leave edit summaries for actual undoes, I did go to that user's talk page and let them know why I reverted it, just like I did today with a user that was removing information, with good intentions, from Haku's page. Must you always jump the gun and think people are doing things out of malicious intent? ~ Ten Tailed Fox Yamagakure Symbol.svg 18:38, July 20, 2013 (UTC)


 * I was not aware, sorry. Anyway, my question to Snapper2 was legitimate. Also, you really need to be less aggressive when conversing with users, there is a hint of being threatening in your tone (which I noticed when you were conversing with TakaSasuke20). --Speysider Talk Page 18:41, July 20, 2013 (UTC)


 * @Snapper2: There is no official rollback policy as such, other than the useful information I added to the page about rollbackers: Narutopedia:Rollback --Speysider Talk Page 18:51, July 20, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Edit summaries
My bad. I often forget to use that a good majority of the time. I'll make a mental note to use it more frequently. Thanks for letting me know. ~ Ten Tailed Fox 18:29, July 20, 2013 (UTC)


 * You're right. If I continue having this issue with the undo button, I'll simply edit it and leave a summary that way. Its no big deal, I just didn't want anyone getting the misconception that I was doing it just to be a douche. Hahaha. Thanks for letting me know either way. I appreciate it. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Yamagakure Symbol.svg 18:49, July 20, 2013 (UTC)

SYSOP
What's does SYSOP mean or stand for? --Kieronrob (talk) 17:08, August 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * It means "system operator", essentially another word to mean an administrator. --Speysider Talk Page 18:52, August 27, 2013 (UTC)

Image
Ahhh sir i wanted to add hundreds of my edited characters render pictures but how can i do it without being blocked.......... Hbxn (talk) 02:49, September 21, 2013 (UTC)

so what i need to do is put my image in the wiki page first then put it in my userpage........ Hbxn (talk) 06:41, September 21, 2013 (UTC)

Ten-Tailed Fox's behavior
Its become blatantly unmodlike. He's lying to my face and others, forcing his opinion on other people, insulting me, accusing me of trolling, all during a debate on Sasuke's Susanoo size. --SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 18:23, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * He's lying about the first three stages of Susanoo's size to claim Sasuke's current giant Complete Stage Susanoo isn't the result of Naruto giving him his Version 1 chakra. I cite several examples (Sasuke's Complete Susanoo riding on Aoba's head, being small enough to fit into the Baku's mouth, being 3-4 times Sasuke's height) and he either ignores them or continually calls them 'inconsistent' despite the examples I show are consistency. And he brings up Madara to claim he has a 'massive' Incomplete Susanoo, which he never had.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 18:53, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * By acting condescending, calling whoever disagrees with him as 'trolls', and even calling other people who don't agree 'conspiracy theorists'.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 19:28, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. As for the size, its the drastic giant size that is in question. But you do have a point on the inconsistency at times of Susanoo's size. Just we never seen it to that big of degree with just the Complete Stage. Thanks for your help though.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 19:49, October 3, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Etiquette
Wow, I almost spelled that title way wrong lol But, it wasn't Susanoo, my button was the fact that the two of them were removing sourced material without asking the community, one of which (that being SuperSaiyaMan) is constantly having his edits reverted for doing. Nonetheless, I apologize. I could've handled that one a bit better. I'll hold my tongue next time. ~ Ten Tailed Fox 20:51, October 3, 2013 (UTC)

Itachi
Thank you, kind sir. That is all. ~ Ten Tailed Fox 00:37, October 23, 2013 (UTC)

"Cool off"
Quoting: "It flies. It has four letters. It starts with an F. And nobody gives it. Anyone who continues this discussion will be blocked" Just wanted to thank you for being such a great example and tutor to others. Just so you know, I hadn't had to cool off, I was already all frozen. Thanks for melting my heart--Elveonora (talk) 11:54, October 31, 2013 (UTC)

Whatever the case, what's done is done. I know the topic about Itachi is unwanted, but it's valid. So Foxie being purposely ignorant just because he doesn't want something resolved is just silly, he shouldn't participate in topics he has no interest in to begin with. Apparently he doesn't care if the contents of the article are true or false. I see where he is coming from tho, ItachiWasHero constantly comes with topics related to calculations and similar things, so it gets annoying and hard to take seriously. The canon speaks clearly tho, at the end of Part I. it was said that Orochimaru had left the Akatsuki 7 years ago, that renders Itachi as having been 11 as of their encounter, so before the massacre. But generally in fandom it's being understood to have occurred post-massacre. It would seem the latter order of events has later dialogue backing it up, thus conflicting with the former statement.--Elveonora (talk) 23:09, October 31, 2013 (UTC)

Infobox Image Sizes
Is there any reason why absolute sizes (200px) are used in volume/chapter infoboxes for images?--~Ultimate Supreme  05:54, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

Tsuzumi
Could you delete 'Tsuzumi' redirect for Tsuzumi Sarugaku? It's needed for move form correct name of Tzuzumi. Or should we name him something like 'Tsuzumi (anime)'?--LeafShinobi (talk) 20:45, December 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks.--LeafShinobi (talk) 21:52, December 6, 2013 (UTC)

pics
could u maybe get pics for pages like Hitode and other miner characters? Munchvtec (talk) 05:47, December 8, 2013 (UTC)munchvtec

Sasuke Appearance (Part II - Leaving The Mountain Graveyard) Photo
If you look at the current photo that's used there are two area's that shouldn't be there. One of them is on his shirt. There's a grey square there that shouldn't even be there. The second one is on his face where it looks as if it's dropping. Here's an image of what I mean. http://i.imgur.com/wI1j2B2.png I circled the two areas in purple so you can see what I meant. Here's the original at 0:58. So that's why I replaced the current photo with the new one. So if possible I'd like to use the image I used which is the original. --LokeTheBrave (talk) 19:50, December 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * First, no links to anime episodes here. Your link is not the original, the original we recognise is Crunchyroll.
 * Second, are you seriously going to be THAT nitpicky ? --Speysider Talk Page 19:54, December 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry I didn't know links to anime episodes weren't allowed. I just checked the Crunchyroll website for episode 326. They too don't have those "edits" I was pointing out. So I think it's only fair that the original image be used. Not the one with the pointed out stuff.


 * And Yes I am going to be THAT nitpicky. By the way here's me being nitpicky right now. You spelled recognize wrong. --LokeTheBrave (talk) 20:07, December 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * Well I made that screencap myself from my own Crunchyroll account, so I have no idea how it got into the actual picture. Also, I'm British, so I don't need an American telling me that I used the WRONG version of English. Protip: British English is more recognised than American English. >_< --Speysider Talk Page 20:10, December 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * I understand that. So, if you don't mind I would like to use the image that doesn't have those edits.


 * Also, I was kidding. Sorry if I offended you. --LokeTheBrave (talk) 20:14, December 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't personally feel the errors are significant enough to replace. But if you are determined to fix them, please be sure to fill out the form on the upload screen.
 * Speysider, as the original uploader, can also take some initiative and fix it himself.
 * Or a third party can get involved, even. ~SnapperTo 20:16, December 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * This is a really really nitpicky thing tbh, there is no reason to fix it. I doubt anyone viewing the wiki would really care about a tiny little pixel not being in place. If it was such a major issue, I'd fix it, but there is no reason to fix it. --Speysider Talk Page 20:51, December 19, 2013 (UTC)

Questions of Sections
What do you think of sections like bukujutsu, Intelligence, things like that? Case by case and overall? Need opinions of other Sysops.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 12:29, January 5, 2014 (UTC)

I like...
can see just the latest 11 edits, nothing before that :-/ --Elveonora (talk) 11:15, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

Thank you a lot, and wow, was some bot or something used for that or all manual work? ._.--Elveonora (talk) 20:58, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

HEY!!
why did u make so many edits for redirects that could have stay as wel now i cant see what happend before on the wiki!!Iloveinoxxx (talk) 21:30, January 19, 2014 (UTC)

charasuke whatever
It would appear it is mentioned here and was discussed here ... what to do? ._.--Elveonora (talk) 19:43, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Edits
Your allowed to copy those types btw what could you do, if I'm allowed then I'm allowedMunchvtec 19:24, February 4, 2014 (UTC)munchvtec

Well whatever and I've contributed to this wiki with pages that I have added a lot of stuff to and I've added many appearance sections and abilities and trivia and others soloMunchvtec 19:36, February 4, 2014 (UTC)munchvtec

Check the page you deleted
It's going pretty well thanks to k a s s a n, he's a huge help on this wiki but anyways the page is fine I'd like know why you deleted it. I said I would help with it.Munchvtec (talk) 22:06, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

four tildes
Hello Thanks a lot,I took a great deal of thought and i solved that problem that i was wanting to ask the admins about thanks again,But excuse me about replying properly here.I tried many times but the same message is showing,i navigated all the page using Screen reader but i couldn't find  use the signature button,i typed also four tildes in the add section) field but the same message is still showing,If i am typing it wrong,could you tell me how it works exactly,and is it ok to check Minor edit instead? and thanks

"Bakayarōshi"
Not sure if you quite remember, that you got involved (I think you've been involved in a few and you're the only sysop that does) in the last major argument I had with Cerez. I have since tried to stray (as I said, tried) from arguing with him. Sometime after that, he made this little notification on his signature that he was aware of me being involved in a discussion I am partaking. He spelled my username wrong (not sure whether or not this was intentional, but his response to me pointing it out makes me think it was), I told him, non-aggressively, about it and he made a really sarcastic apology to me. And now, recently he called me this. From what I've got from it, he's calling me a "stupid old teacher". Of the times I have argued with him, I have not insulted him. These two discussions, he seems to be trying to bait me into a fight and I'm being the adult and no giving him what he presumably wants. I've reported him to a Community Wikia mod a while ago, and his response was to tell a mod about my problems with him. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 22:33, March 1, 2014 (UTC)


 * I can't find it, but it was sometime between March 11, 2013 and April 4, 2013. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 00:08, March 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * You're misunderstanding. I'm not saying he's being aggressive, but those times I mentioned he seemingly tried to bait me. And if you haven't seen the comment he made before he removed it here, he also called me Omega-ba, grandma, too. As I said, I have not gone to calling him names like he has been doing. Also, what I was saying about that signature was that he was spelling my username in what seemed like he was trying to bait me. I did not have a problem with that notification. He knows very well what has happened between us over the years and refuses to admit it. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 03:06, March 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * Despite what I said, baiting him is the last thing I ever want to do...why would I want to do that? You're acting as though I intend that. He gets under my skin yeah, angering me to the point where I say things like that. And it's pretty unbelievable you're letting him, the one throwing insults, get away with this. I may have said those things, but I did not go insulting him. He is just a wrong in this situation as me. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 05:15, March 2, 2014 (UTC)

Madara the leader of Akatsuki?
I have a question why isn't Madara the leader of AkatuskiMadara the epic god (talk) 05:48, March 2, 2014 (UTC)

Madara the epic god's behaviour

 * This user is doing pointless edits without even taking a look at the page he's editing to make sure he isn't just repeating something that was already mentioned. It's extremely irritating.--JOA20 (talk) 07:10, March 2, 2014 (UTC)

Michma12
Michma12

This user has been putting irrelevant info on Hinata's page with the whole Ultimate Ninja Storm games which the character selection screen shows Naruto and Hinata as "Secret Lovers" when other games see Naruto and Sakura in the same light when both couples are one-sided. That edit seems like flame bait to me for NaruSaku fans plus it really isn't relevant information whatsoever. I've tried undoing the edit many times, but he keeps putting it back up. Plus he's doing the same thing with the Naruto Uzumaki's Relationship page putting up edits implying Naruto used to have feelings for Sakura when it was never confirmed at any point and it's more of his speculation than actual fact. He's seems to do this with every Naruto, Sakura and Hinata related page. Could you please warn him? Thank you. --MegamanZero0002 (talk) 19:01, March 5, 2014 (UTC)

So am I to assume we are cutting down the trivia in the other character profiles such as Sasuke, Sakura, Naruto, Ino, Kakashi etc? If not it looks kinda biased. Not accusing. --Michma12 (talk) 22:42, March 5, 2014 (UTC)

Problem
Michma12 is once again putting the edit that "Naruto HAD feelings for Sakura" on Uzumaki's Relationship page when there's no proof whatsoever to support this. I asked him to provide a panel or piece of information to prove his point yet he has not and chose to continue putting same speculation on page. Can you please deal with him? Thank you. --MegamanZero0002 (talk) 00:00, March 6, 2014 (UTC)

Apology
I read your warning and I sincerely apologize for letting it escalate that far into a edit war. I'm new around here but I will read the rules more clearly and make sure I deal with the situation in a mature manner. --MegamanZero0002 (talk) 06:15, March 6, 2014 (UTC)

Request
Snapper-sama. Can you unprotect Honoka's infobox? Because I want to add her English VA. Thanks. — Shakhmoot  (Talk) 19:40, April 19, 2014 (UTC)

I was told you needed Settei proof
http://blog.pierrot.jp/archives/category/naruto this blog has 90% of the settei's stored. If you need to see them closer you copy the image link and remove this(-1024x723) part in the link, so the link ends up like this one.

http://blog.pierrot.jp/wp-content/uploads/blog.pierrot.jp/2014/01/%E5%B0%91%E5%B9%B4%E9%95%B7%E9%96%80.jpg

I am missing some of the settei I had previously due to restarting computer and not saving all for storage. But I do have lots of settei that are not on this blog. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 18:14, April 21, 2014 (UTC)

Permission update
Hi Snapper2. I'm wondering what your thoughts are regarding removing the ability for all users to remove other people's threads and posts from the forums. In the Forum Mod flag thread, I mentioned this repeatedly, but I don't think many people focused on that. I know TTF has said that he supports removing the ability for normal users to remove threads/posts as they don't need such a thing (also, it's been abused). Please let me know of your position on my talkpage, thank you. (to others who see this, DO NOT RESPOND!) --Speysider Talk Page 18:22, April 25, 2014 (UTC)

Forum support
I think you would be the best person to ask at thins point: could you create a forum request page similar to how Jacce's talk page is set up? So we can get the ball rolling on forum support.—Cerez 365 ™(talk) 22:19, May 24, 2014 (UTC)

Mangekyō Sharingan Black Zetsu
Hello. I tried to move this to this so that Obito's Mangekyō would appear in Black Zetsu's infobox, but it didn't work. Hope not to have troubled you…--JOA20 (talk) 07:13, May 28, 2014 (UTC)

Summon redirect
Any particular reason why you're going through articles bypassing them? Something technical? I find that one useful, much like the shadow clone one. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 18:52, June 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Was wondering the same thing. ~ IndxcvNovelist →talk • contribs • watty← 18:53, June 4, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Deletion requests
Okay. Thanks for the advice, Snapper-sama. — Shakhmoot  (Talk) 18:01, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

Restore image
Can you please restore the image I had uploaded to File:Kiba vs Naruto.png? My image was of much higher quality and the file that you have placed there just seems to be from someone who has downloaded the image I had uploaded and reuploaded under a lower resolution. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 08:22, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, there we go. Thanks! :) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 08:32, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't it be better to just delete the uploads that Chieko-san is making and have them uploaded onto the originals, instead of deleting, merging and restoring? Some of the reuploads are of lower resolution than the originals (like with File:Episode 47.png). --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 08:52, June 20, 2014 (UTC)

Re: "Naruto"
Thanks for this. It's quite honestly redundant to state "Naruto" manga when it's obviously a Naruto wiki. It makes sense on the anime parts on a disambig, because there are two separate animes about the whole manga. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:31, July 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, might be wise to run UltimateSupreme's bot on this. I'll drop a message to UltiSup on his TP. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:40, July 3, 2014 (UTC)

Flags and Coat of arms
Snapper-sama, I added these images because they appear on templates and MediaWiki, but these images were not here. Should you add they again? → Sharingan_Triple.svg Rafael Uchiha  Uchiha_Symbol.svg 01:19, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * On Template:PD. → Sharingan_Triple.svg Rafael Uchiha  Uchiha_Symbol.svg 13:49, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * I haven't example, but I added because they were missing here... I think this is important, cause have on template... → Sharingan_Triple.svg Rafael Uchiha  Uchiha_Symbol.svg 13:49, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * No, I haven't... Sorry... → Sharingan_Triple.svg Rafael Uchiha  Uchiha_Symbol.svg 18:38, July 7, 2014 (UTC)

Halving Madara Uchiha's page
I'm all for cutting the fat out. I myself have removed over thousands of bytes of data different characters that you and other people in your position of authority have approved. Recently, I even removed over 1000 bytes on Madara's personality. But personally, I think you removed a bit to much on Madara's page. For example, Madara's well-above average power in the Sharingan is a noteworthy trait of his. I just sating that some of the stuff should be put back. Steveo920, July 7, 2014, 8:15

Re: Kunoichi101 edits
Can you please explain to Kunoichi101 that edits like this are completely pointless and that the template she is using was not designed for this purpose? I've had enough of reverting these edits that are obviously trying to pad her edit count and she has warning after warning to stop making pointless edits, but they seem to make no imprint on her at all. I'm sick of cleaning up after her edits that do nothing for the wiki whatsoever. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 15:46, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * i don't know what just happened, but all i did was noticing something too close to the infobox. Kunoichi101 (talk) 16:01, July 7, 2014 (UTC)Kunoichi101
 * The problem is that, if the edit is made "legitimate" and "not disruptive", she'll go and do just that. According to the template's documentation (for ), it was meant just for images, not just adding spaces wherever people feel like it. There would likely be little issue on the episode articles if the summaries stretched the length of the infobox, instead of stopping before it. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 18:12, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Please allow me to butt in: Ever since this darn Darwin-layout was established, people with wide screens like me have this problem that the text takes less space than before and the images look awfully out of place. I guess Kunoichi101 has the same problem and tried to solve it, unknowing that it does not make any difference for those who might have a smaller screen. Here is a screenshot with the template and one without it, also one of Madara's appearance section to show the thing about the images being out of place. Please delete the screenshots afterwards. Norleon (talk) 19:08, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Now I understand the true purpose of this template, yeah. The people who have higher screen resolution may have this problem. Thanks so much for clarifying that Norleon-san :) — Shakhmoot Nadeshiko Village Symbol.svg (Talk) 19:11, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * The template was only meant for images. This problem can just be solved easily by ensuring the summary of an article is the length of the infobox, if it is possible to do so. If necessary, just add trivia points below the summary and above the credits. Otherwise, we might as well just add the template in every single article when it's not really necessary. TBH, it's not really a big issue if they are too close together, I doubt very many people actually look at episode articles to see who the voices actors were, more likely they just read the summary and nothing more. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:13, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * @Shakhmoot: You're welcome! ;)
 * @Spey...SuperSajuuk (:P) I don't think bloating the article up so the text is on one level with the infobox isn't the right thing to do, especially adding a trivia section just for that reason. If we could add more legit content, then it's a different story of course. Also, I do agree that a template shouldn't be used for something it wasn't originally made for just because, but I don't see a problem to adjust the...policies or whatever for its usage if it might come in handy. Surely, this whole thing isn't that much of a deal, but still, if there's a way to fix it, we should use it. If there's no way of course, we just have to deal with it. Norleon (talk) 19:25, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * The template is not solely intended for images; that is just one of the problems it can fix. If it can fix more than one problem, all the better. ~SnapperTo 20:43, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * It was originally created for just solving the problem with images. If you want to use this on other pages, get UltiSup to run his bot as nearly every article will need it then. I see little point in adding the template, it's not really affecting anything at all, it's not like the credits table is going right through the infobox.... --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 20:45, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * That was its original purpose. In 2007. Now, in 2014, it has found a second purpose. Joys of joys.
 * The template has no negative impact on those who don't need it, its use is harmless. ~SnapperTo 20:51, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * @Shakhmoot, SuperSajuuk, and Norleon: Hmm... Are we really not doing the template in the near future or what? I mean after creating a episode and someone put a credit too early without a summary, it may be too close that is. Kunoichi101 (talk) 14:11, July 8, 2014 (UTC)Kunoichi101

Re: Bad edits
Hi Snapper. I noticed you recently reverted an edit by Kunoichi on this article. When I looked at the diff, it seems like she made a fodder edit to remove a comma from one of the infobox parameters. Simant has warned Kunoichi repeatedly in the past to stop making such edits, which you can see here. I don't feel that Kunoichi's edits are productive to the wiki and are simply a veiled attempt to violate the Manual of Style and pad the user's edit count. Please can you look into this? Thanks. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 17:46, July 26, 2014 (UTC)