User talk:SuperSajuuk

Re: Block
I tried a warning. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 09:19, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 16:59, February 4, 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 08:48, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

I hope you have noticed the comments about the user, both on his and yours talkpage. I placed the ball in his corner, so let's see what happens. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 18:53, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 08:16, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

Have you solved the problem? Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:09, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

I'm on it. I think I can handle it from here. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:16, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 18:39, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 10:39, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 13:43, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Solved. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 14:34, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:21, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

Solved. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 10:41, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

The Narutopedia:Talkpage policy states: ''The Talk page does not belong to the user, it belongs to the community. Users are not allowed to do other actions that hinder users' abilities to send messages to you. The point of archive is to clean up old messages, you may only archive resolved discussions''. Whether or not Kunoichi101 is getting block is not my decision, but the Admins. Though since she has been warn numerous of time, it's most likely she will. White Flash 19:23, May 2, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Delete
Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:07, May 13, 2012 (UTC)

Deleted. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:34, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Narutopedia talk:Image policy#Administrative Declaration
I do not require help in enforcing my order. I am aware what he's doing as he was uploading while I typed up the declaration. As of now, he's fine to finish what he was in the middle of.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 19:12, May 18, 2012 (UTC)


 * And thus you've learned an important lesson: Not every image can be changed. That image was a colored manga with no true anime alternative. Thus it should not be changed.--TheUltimate3 Uzumaki Symbol.svg (talk) 12:11, May 24, 2012 (UTC)


 * Possible, as anything is.--TheUltimate3 Uzumaki Symbol.svg (talk) 12:16, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Image Upload Hogging
I knew exactly what you ment. Telling someone they can't act is the same as saying their actions are blocking someone else from contributing. People are free to upload as many images as they want, just as someone else is free to upload what they want. That is what discussion is for.

And because I know I'm free falling into a trap, a discussion is supposed to know when a ending should be reached. When neither side wishes to relent or make a consensus and the entire thing devolves into a long pissing contest, then we have things like the Declaration pop up and ruin everyone's fun.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 12:28, May 25, 2012 (UTC)


 * And that is normal. I want Impure World Reincarnation to be Resurrection. I want Sage Art: Many Ultra-Big Ball Spiralling Serial Spheres to be Sage Art: Super Big Ball Rasentarengan. I desperately want Minato's full body shot out of his article. But unfortunately, save for the last one, there have been descent, disagreements, and finally closure. Not everything will end the way you wish it, and you should expect less than that.--TheUltimate3 Uzumaki Symbol.svg (talk) 12:36, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Lemme sneak in, since you want the 'Resurrection' over 'Reincarnation', is the discussion about that still on? —IndxcvNovelist (Talk to Me|My Wiki) 12:40, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Well aware of it. I'm not going to be apart of it. The reason for Reincarnation is sound, nor can I find the kanji that tensei is indeed Resurrection. As such, I feel there is nothing really to discuss and I'm just waiting patiently for the conversation to dwindle into nothingness.--TheUltimate3 Uzumaki Symbol.svg (talk) 12:48, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's no fun unless you build the answer yourself. Think about it. (^^)--TheUltimate3 Uzumaki Symbol.svg (talk) 13:11, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

RE: Rollback
I tried rolling it back and got a confirmation message as well, it might have to do with the current revision being the same as what it should be rollbacked to. — S im A nt 00:21, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

Images
Forgot that unfortunately. --ShenLong Kazama (talk) 10:41, May 30, 2012 (UTC)

I got this timeskip photo idea from Bleach Wikia (Star Blazer 5 (talk) 10:46, May 30, 2012 (UTC))

Image Update Request
Ehrm, since you're having the work on images, please if possible change the quality of this. I will be adding more images though.

—IndxcvNovelist (talk 07:35, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Shadow Imitation Technique.JPG (episode 70)
 * File:A Mistake from the Past A Face Revealed!.JPG (episode 72)
 * File:Manipulating Attack Blades.PNG (episode 76)
 * File:Nisen.jpg (episode 78)
 * Hello, did you tried finding replacement for those image? By the way lucky for me I found an image in 16:9 ratio. —IndxcvNovelist (talk 11:26, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh okay. —IndxcvNovelist (talk 12:47, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Pakura HDShot.png
Hey mate, I hope you have read the Image Policy wherein it is stated:

"Avoid widescreen shots. Widescreen images sometimes contain black bars, and more importantly the large width of the images disrupts the visibility of thumbnails by increasing the amount of empty space. It's best to clip the image down to what you are actually depicting. "

I suppose that's a legitimate reason for you :) akz!  16:37, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Not that I want very much to interject here, but the cropping done by Aditya Sasuke makes the infobox image much bigger and less like a rectangle.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 16:45, May 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * I quoted the above line from the Image Policy to actually highlight the 'clipping the image' part (the last line). So, it's better to crop down the unnecessary free background and show the image of Pakura which you are actually depicting. akz! ANBU Symbol.svg 16:47, May 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * Don't get so worked up, the cropped one looks better and bigger in the infobox other than that widescreen image. There is no hard-and-fast rule that you MUST do that, but you MUST choose the best possible alternative, which is the cropped image. akz! ANBU Symbol.svg  16:54, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not talking about centralisation here, ok? It's about how the infobox looks better, that was a different issue. akz! ANBU Symbol.svg 16:56, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Firstly, it was just a suggestion though. And I'd very much like you to stop attacking me and other people as well (or else learn how to talk to people better). I have the emotional depth of a teaspoon so your "woe-is-me" stints do very little but exasperate me.

Now, while I'd love to be able to change all those images, the current issue at hand is the Pakura one, and in this case, it's actually better this way. It's not a grand difference even worth mentioning but just cosmetically it does sit better in the infobox.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 17:02, May 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * Even the one who made the policy is against widescreen shots, I can't do anything.......And the cropped image looks perfectly fine, the wider shot didn't look super distorted or whatsoever but in comparison to the current one the main content of the image looked smaller. And you are free to use widescreen shots in between the article, and in the infoboxes too, but here I feel that free background space is strongly not reqd. akz! ANBU Symbol.svg 17:03, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, it's about taking the credit and all, then you are free to upload a cropped image yourself, and get a sysop to delete all the intermediate reverted ones......So, if you are so emotionally attached with your image and you want to take the credit of offering the divine help to the wiki by uploading 1080p widerscreenshots, then you are free to upload the cropped one and to tell you I have no interest in taking the credit of your image.... akz! ANBU Symbol.svg 17:08, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know who makes the policy here, maybe ShounenSuki or Omnibender, but I don't know it. akz! ANBU Symbol.svg 17:10, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, cropping the image doesn't reduce the quality so it's still High Definition...It doesn't necessarily be 16:9 ratio... akz! ANBU Symbol.svg 17:12, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * I know it means any video system of higher resolution, but by that "High Definition", I used in my previous comment was too lay stress on the quality and not the resolution. akz! ANBU Symbol.svg 17:15, May 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah, and again we reach the root of all problems with you: the image is no longer HD? I can't understand why that has validity in anything.
 * Taking credit for what you upload? Where did you see them do that? Did they put it on a page and claim it as their own? Because I seem to remember that being done with File:Moving Earth Core.png...
 * You need to brush up on your sarcasm. I of all persons should be able to recognise that, because sir, none of that is sarcasm.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 17:52, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

The issue's been resolved and since I don't think any good will come of me responding to your last message, I'll leave you to your own devices.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 18:02, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Rationale on my images
Images don't belong to people, it belongs to the wiki unless you created it. It just happens that one person might upload the image. Now as for the rationale, I apologise, I was just so overcome with hatred that I had to change it, not because I've done it a million times in order to make the rationales mainstream.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 16:34, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Images don't belong to anyone here except for the ones you create. It just so happens that you uploaded those images, they aren't yours. In any case I'm not really up for the drawn out discussion which will inevitably lead to an argument with you, so I'll let your images alone so you can go in peace.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 16:48, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Anime-Manga Differences
i meant when Sasuke puts Danzo in a genjutsu then itachi appears this: --EzioLover (talk) 11:49, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

re: Kunichi101
No. — S im A nt 19:15, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

you're right and... i'm stupidly wrong
lesson learned. i will never archieve anything too early or not. and... i don't want to be the worst enemy of yours truly. of course yesterday, i stopped doing episode english infobox due to your message. you're right all the time. and i don't want to be an enemy.Kunoichi101 (talk) 00:24, June 6, 2012 (UTC)

just to tell you i'm been this wiki for three years before you came... and i'm been through so many difficult conflicts all the time... Kunoichi101 (talk) 18:11, June 6, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Episode Names
Because it's apart of our naming policy we never actually talked about. Usually when we name things, they will be literal translations (such as all techniques, and the Great Nations) or partial translations (Konohagakure instead of Konohagakure no Sato), untranslated at all (all kekkei genkai, ninjutsu, genjutsu ect). Manga titles are usually literally translated as they come out in Japan first and it would be best to use that as opposed to their Romaji. Anime episodes have always been a gray area, mainly because for the most part, nobody cared one way or the other. I however feel it would be easier to just follow the translation provided to us from CrunchyRoll or Wikipedia, just to keep things consistent.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 11:30, June 6, 2012 (UTC)