Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-45206069-20200317024412/@comment-45173656-20200327081619

Squinty97 wrote: @Inertiaworld

I'm not ignoring what you said. You only replied with any sort of argument (if there is one, haven't read past the point I stopped replying), so I just didn't see it. And if you'll notice, I only came back when you started violating forum policy.

Then when I told you you were violating forum policy, you started claiming I had no reason to respond to you. But I do lol. To your earlier replies, I responded because you were failing to give an argument. Asking you to clarify your stance is hardly an unfair request. To your later replies, I only explained that you were breaking rules. Then you asked why I responded at all. Kinda cyclical, but yeah there's a reason for all of it.

It is in fact that simple, if you go back and read where I came back into the thread lol.

Again, when you post a reply in a forum, you are inviting a response from anybody. If that's too hard for you, take it to a talkpage instead.

Again, no one is saying you should care if I'm a mod. I'm letting you know I'm a mod so you'll understand that it's literally my role to let you know whe you're breaking the rules. I'll just repeat what I said above and make it even clearer, since you seemed to just have ignored it.

Doesn't seem to me to be as simple as "The only reason I ended up coming back was to let you know when you were breaking the rules, which you took issue with for some reason."

If it was, then why did you keep talking about explanations for arguments regarding Boruto Era Sakura vs Part 1 Lee in taijutsu which wasn't even addressed to you then, even after coming back? Is not "providing explanations for arguments" breaking the rules as well? Lol

Go and look at your replies yourself. It's extremely obvious. Your "cyclical" explanation is clearly reaching.