User talk:Simant

Re: Team Infobox
If you can do it in a way that doesn't cause existing queries to become a complex mess (or at least not any messier). Otherwise it's better to use another property. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Feb 12, 2010 @ 08:05 (UTC)


 * I was wondering, is it possible to somehow make a distinction between ad hoc, single-mission teams like the Sasuke Retrieval Team and more established teams like the genin teams? --ShounenSuki (talk 17:40, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I was thinking of a separate property row called team type, or something. --ShounenSuki (talk 18:18, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's a bit of a problem, actually. the team status property shouldn't be there. It's the same as using current or former, which we've been trying to get rid off as well. --ShounenSuki (talk 21:59, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * It might be a bit superfluous in terms of information, but I would personally like to be able to sort the teams on team type. --ShounenSuki (talk 22:13, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I haven't really thought about the exact terms yet. It will really depend on what exactly is considered a team, as opposed to a partnership or an organisation.
 * I could see values for genin team (e.g. Team Kakashi) and ad hoc teams (e.g. the Sasuke Retrieval Team), perhaps criminal gangs (e.g. the Magaki group) and specialised teams (e.g. Twelve Guardian Ninja and the various teams of the Nijū Shōtai). --ShounenSuki (talk 22:20, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

2 Things

 * 1) Might want to think about another archive. This is starting to get long.
 * 2) Color for the infoboxes. /shrug think they are stable enough to handle it? I dunno they are all grey and it seems kinda boring >.>. Like Green for Konoha, Beige for Suna, Purple for Oto, ect, ect.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 17:40, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I would say they people like him would have the color of their most recent affiliation. For example, Orochimaru would be purple, for Sound, while Sasuke would be...well...I think he would be gray for straight missing-nin...All members of Akatsuki would have Red...ect...ect...--TheUltimate3 (talk) 01:56, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I think it would be more logical to use their main affiliation; the village of which they have the symbol in their databook profile. Otogakure for Orochimaru, Konohagakure for Madara and Sasuke, Kirigakure for Suigetsu, etcetera. --ShounenSuki (talk 13:46, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * That make sense...But for some reason seeing Sasuke's affiliation be green for Konoha just seems...stupid. For some reason I have less of an issue with Madara's (though I still would like some sort of red or red/black for Akatsuki) being green...--TheUltimate3 (talk) 14:07, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * Affiliation is really that village that a character is most put into connection with. Sasuke is still thought off as a Konoha-nin, just like Madara is. I wouldn't find it odd at all to see him with a Konoha infobox. --ShounenSuki (talk 18:24, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * @Simant Understood. Don't worry about it if it's a problem. I'll figure something out once everything is stable and what not.
 * @ShounenSuki: It's more or less my strong anti-Sasuke sentiment. The fact that I can see the series true villain with the Konoha symbol, but not Sasuke is really because I see him as an asshat. >.>--TheUltimate3 (talk) 18:35, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Kanji Question
The Japanese equivalent of the comma is 、. If the normal commas don't work well and you dislike the Japanese commas, you could always just use a semicolon instead. --ShounenSuki (talk 13:53, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Possible bug
Not sure if this is a bug in the jutsu infobox or in the character infobox, but in Han's infobox, his only technique (Steam-based Ninjutsu) is listed three times. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:06, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps a problem at Steam-based Ninjutsu? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:40, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Rinnegan
Honestly the guys an idiot. Been gone so long I'm acting childish. *sigh*  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 03:06, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah I saw that but I didn't want to get rid of eerything so I had to do it the hard way.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 04:07, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Please stop making me feel bad about things I miss. Last time I tried to archive my talk page I blanked it and had to rollback everything. This was all back before that easy button. D: I waas putting it off until today hoping to get it right; which I did :D  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 04:12, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I know. Me and you still good right?  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 04:18, February 20, 2010 (UTC)