Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-38812954-20190831032416/@comment-9782468-20190918053019

Facts aren't just semi important when you're calling a moment in the series a plot hole. People here discuss hypotheticals and whatnot, but they're all based around the facts of the series.

If you wanna have a discussion about different takes and ideas for the series, that's fine. Make a thread for that. But when you make a thread claiming that something doesn't make sense in the series when it in fact did make sense because of the facts the series presented, people are obviously going to let you know.

Essentially, this thread was you saying that parts of the end battle didn't make sense. Then I started telling you how it did make sense based on evidence from the series, but you then said facts matter less than your imagination.

How does it make sense to start a discussion saying something was wrong about the series, but disregarding the facts in favor of your imagination?