Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-25645405-20141128183407/@comment-25626003-20141201123528

New World God wrote: "Bringing up Blaze Release is a poor comparison. Amaterasu "is" a Blaze Release technique."

No, its not. It was never stated to be a "Blaze Release" Jutsu. It was specifically called " Fire-Release". You can "thumb-thug' your confirmation bias all you want. No where has it ever been called "Blaze Release". Yes, it does have the "Black Flames" But from what was stated that Sasuke was the only one to use it because he was able to manipulate the Amaterasu. Also for future references I suggest that instead of tossing me a conjecture of adjectives, you actually make an argument. You're welcome.

" Sasuke & Itachi utilizes black flames to incinerate oppenents or anything he sees fit, which I believe the 3rd databook states; having control over it is a different technique altogether"

No, you actually just made me right. Because by your own admission that it's a "different technique". Not that I really disagree with the Amaterasu being Blaze Release. Not that the passage is actually cited from the actual datebook I have a bigger issue for it be based on the author. Not based on some appeal to emotion, via.island mentality. Because if this is a database where its honors itself in the accuracies and canon material. Than we wouldn't be having this conversation. It was never stated in ANY media (which doesn't mean anime, it doesn't mean non-canon. because it includes : Anime, Manga, Movies etc.) If that doesn't mean nothing than you guys really need to re-evaluate whether you're arguing from an empirical position or some subjective position. To which I'll just stop. Because there is not point of having a debate with those who will rather base their arguments on subjective positions. But don't place the position that you're doing this from some form of conjecture based on the actual material. That is all I have to say about the Blaze Release.

"Fact is, we all assumed Magnet Release is what Gaara used to manipulate sand. Since the databook "disproves" it, and there was no evidence in the manga even implying so, why list it here? I say list sand manipulation in his unique traits section and leave it at "

Actually I don't disagree with that. I don't have a problem with it at all. I actually agree with the Sand manipulation point. It's actually very agreeable.

WindStar7125 wrote: New World God wrote: Yeah, Kinda the giant leap that was made to create the magnet release on the article, kinda like the jump to judgement that Amaterasu is blaze release, even though no media has confirmed this. Which you later deleted my comment, and blamed me for it. This place seems beyond selective, almost too selective filled with contradictions. Shukaku in this wikia is stated to have "Magnet Release". Blaze Release is the release of black flames. Yes, no "media" confirmed that, but the manga did in chapter 464 (stated by Gaara, calling both Sasuke's Amaterasu and Kagutsuchi "black flames"). I suggest you read it and not the "media." And Minamoto15 is correct, it's a poor comparison and another topic altogether. We're talking Gaara, his sand and Magnet Release here. So no "giant leap" when it was stated in the manga. And seriously, let's stop bringing up Blaze Release. The topic asks for Gaara, his sand and Magnet. I'm not going to argue about what Blaze is here. Please. :)

And again, with Gaara, sand and Magnet, it is what it is, according to our translator, that's what Kishi said.

"I'm not going to argue about what Blaze is here. Please. :)"

You just did. You're welcome.

Proof : ""Blaze Release is the release of black flames. Yes, no "media" confirmed that, but the manga did in chapter 464 (stated by Gaara, calling both Sasuke's Amaterasu and Kagutsuchi "black flames")." My argument was pretty clear; if you don't want to see it that's your own choice. Anyway, tau pretty much reiterated my point with better wording so that's that. Topic's been beaten to death anyway. Out.