Talk:Jūzō Biwa

Deletion
I know I am going to pick up flak for this — and I am prepared for the discussion about me at Central wikia that may ensue — but are we not trying to deviate away from creating articles like these? The information we have here can all be subsumed on their team page until they get named. This goes for all the "previous wielder" articles created today.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 12:51, March 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree with this --Kasan94 (talk) 18:11, March 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Why exactly are we trying to lower the amount of pages on this wikia? i'm clueless on this fact and i added to this page so i see nothing wrong with letting it stay. Munchvtec (talk) 18:14, March 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Someone told you that there was a race on to build up articles on the wiki? Quality over quantity should be our focus. --Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 19:45, March 12, 2014 (UTC)


 * Why would we have to go to Central Wikia for anything? (Comically missing the point)
 * I honestly could care less. I would like to not get rid of it, but I would not fight against it. We don't have a page about the Uchiha blokes that murdered that Senju kid.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 18:23, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Really don't see why you feel the need to delete this. There may not be a name, but there's enough info on him to warrant one. If he doesn't get one, then some of the kages and jinchuuriki shouldn't have one either. MangekyoSasuke (talk) 18:27, March 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree with mangekyo on this one. Munchvtec (talk) 18:28, March 12, 2014 (UTC)


 * @Ulti, that central thing is for a war I was not aware I was fighting and not nearly significant enough for me to mention. I'll link you to it some time over marijuana.
 * @MangekyoSasuke - what information other than the fact that they all look cool? Other articles like ones for Kage are there because they actually have information to fill the article somewhat and it doesn't follow the generic naming convention of "previous/unknown x person" we tried to root out of the wiki. jinchūriki articles are all valid since to my knowledge they all have names so it could be a one-liner, name > everything else. I am not proposing that we do away with the info, simply do what we did to the unknown clan members.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 18:51, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Just a question, if the anime makes credits to him and names him. So would we restore this article after deletion? — Shakhmoot  (Talk) 19:05, March 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Definitely. It would have more grounds to stand on as a substantiated article. Anyone with two working brain cells can fluff an articles with appearance and personality sections.-Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 19:45, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

My complaint with this is that, not only is the name thing an issue, but we're assuming a lot of information. I mean this is less than 20 years ago and this article assumes this guy is dead. There's no guarantee of that, not likely he's alive, but given the amount of crap that's been kicked up over maybes etc. in the past, it seems presumptuous. Not to mention, do we actually know that everyone who occupied the Seven Swordsmen is a Jounin? I mean we know Zabuza, Kisame and Chojuro are I think, but much like Anbu or the 12 Guardian Ninja, it doesn't seem to be a pre-requisite. --Hawkeye2701 (talk) 21:29, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Out of the "new" swordsmen, this is the only one that I can see having an article somewhat justifiably kept, as he's the only one who interacted with any other established characters. I still think that the most sensible thing to do is to delete the articles, and mention them in a "other members" section, kinda like we do with clan members. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:18, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

That's funny, I went round and round a long time ago with ShonenSuki about Zabuza being a Jonin. I still hold that he is because he was called a Jonin by the characters but to no avail. Arrancar79 (talk) 22:27, March 12, 2014 (UTC)