Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-9782468-20160128040953/@comment-24808887-20160129030216

Bob1200 wrote: It Requires Both Six Paths Senjutsu And Rinnegan, Which Means That Madara Could POSSIBLY Do It. But Naruto And Sasuke Alone Cannot Create The Marks. Cite where it said that it requires Rinnegan, because without it, it's your opinion against Databook description, and your opinion in loss.

JouXIII wrote: @Rage gtx Oh, I'm not Sasuke-fan, not at all. Neither like him or hate him. Same thing with Uchiha. As for Rinnegan... Eh, who wouldn't like it? It would be number 2 of my favourite Dōjutsu(alongside with Byakugan), Rinne Sharingan being number 1. And did not that you are any of them either, but being just one of them is enought, to become subjective.

JouXIII wrote: I'm just pointing out, like Bob said, that in order to use SP - CT, you need Six Paths Yang Power(Naruto/Hagoromo), Six Paths Yin Power(Sasuke/Hamura) and Chibaku Tensei, which comes from Rinnegan. After all, Sasuke made the Tailed Beasts as gravitional core with his own CT, so black sphere isn't completely necessary.

And what you both pointing out is baseless, as it goes against Description and no databook term KKG does not link to specific KKG(like wikia) they usually noted in description and guess what, Rinnegan was not there. Descriptions always taken as face value(unless they go against manga, wich is not the case). Descriptions stated that genjutsu requires yin, all terms that go against it were corrected(Hashirama's case, Danzo's case, Karin's hiden case).

JouXIII wrote: As for what Databook says... It could be true, or it could be another error from Kishimoto. He's only human after all... Just like we are. I hope you do understand that majority of Kishimoto's "errors" are in terms(KKG in our case - but again it doesn't say Rinnegan) section not in descriptions, following human objective logic we are left with conclusion that chances that mistake was made in "terms" considerable more high than chances it was made in description - wich result of Authors mental activity about the subject reflected in sentences unlike "terms".