Board Thread:Episode Discussions/@comment-25319479-20150115114150/@comment-7292165-20150115220021

@Seel No thanks.

@Iar Let's say it was that. Some of them would still be older than what the databooks said their ages were when they are promoted. Example. Sakura would've been 15 after 18-19 months using your example. When someone says two years it means two years or it means its close enough so it'd have to past if it was a year and let's say 8 months you would say two or say almost two years but they clearly state two years. Either way its a filler but that doesn't mean I have to accept their errors. Also we are forgetting the most flawed thing is the Sand Siblings, that's more of what got to me. Either way I believe this is gonna be a good arc despite some errors I know will exist.

Where was the arc name for these episodes confirmed from as it is called Naruto's Back: Friends' Tracks? I swear of this is correct anime people are even worse than Kishi when making arc names lol