Talk:Lava Release

Mei's Lava Release (yes, again)
The fourth databook states that 溶遁 is something only Mei can use. • Seelentau 愛 議 15:16, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Well then, what're we gonna do about it? Change Mei's version to "Dissolution Release" or what?--JOA2015:46, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's still called Lava Release though :/ A trivia note should suffice. It could be an advanced version of Lava Release. You should have no issues with this statement considering what you did to Typhoon Release. Munchvtec (talk) 15:47, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not Lava Release, it's Corrosion Release. Typhoon Release is some novel bullshit. • Seelentau 愛 議 15:52, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Corrosion is the viz name, no? They called Roshi's Lava Release Corrosion Style. Munchvtec (talk) 15:53, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * No, it's the literal translation. ShounenSuki explained it ages ago. Anyway, if it's something only Mei can use, it obviously can't be the same as the Lava Release the others use. • Seelentau 愛 議 15:56, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * It would still be under the Lava release name regardless. According to your idea, combining two chakra natures CAN create more than one advanced nature. Munchvtec (talk) 15:57, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * We go with what it's literally called. Lave Release. Corrosion is an alternate translation as far as i know. Make a trivia note. That's all. If this changes we may as well change everything we know about chakra natures. Magnet release would be screwed as well as Explosion and such. Munchvtec (talk) 16:05, July 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not my idea, it's the databook's idea. Also, you have literally zero knowledge in Japanese, so why do you think you can tell me what's the right thing to do? • Seelentau 愛 議 16:31, July 2, 2016 (UTC)

You're able to tell me what i know, how?? I'm so terribly sorry if i don't happen to know as much as you. Why even bother with talk pages when you're going to do whatever you want anyways? If this gets changed then we will have to change tons of stuff. Are you saying that in the original, literally translated content, it has never been called Lava release? Munchvtec (talk) 16:55, July 2, 2016 (UTC)