Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-1732320-20160111174438/@comment-17623-20160226013632

For those like Kohada, like it or not, gets a pass because they actually appeared in a databook (which like it or not is the series Bible, you can cry about that as much as you'd like), but even for them, a lack of an article wouldn't be an issue considering just how minor they are.

I'd just be a very happy man if these unnamed character articles had more going for them than "They are related to X" to justify their existence. And no Spey, info wouldn't be lost to the void just because an article is no longer there.

And the thing about each article having it's own discussion is, in all actuality, a trap. This discussion here has been going on and off for months. Breaking it down unnamed character, by unnamed character will just mean we would go from 1 centralized discussion on this issue to several dozen. All of them going literally exactly the same way.

EDIT: In regards to Unnamed Techniques and Techniques with clearly Made up Names, that's an even harder thing to fix especially since a lot of them end up in a game at some point and are named there. Ends up in a situation where a canon technique is actually used and now a "canon" name for it is found.