Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-1251315-20141013163027/@comment-28861328-20141013164342

Absolutely 100% against. Not only does he purposely flame users and have no shame in doing so, he has, in recent memory (but over the course of his entire editing career here as well) referred to fellow users as "mentally retarted", "stupid", "idiots", "morons", and frequently curses at other users in general if they don't support his ideas or positions. Within the past few weeks alone, another prominent member of the wiki had to reprimand him about his general attitude towards his fellow editors, to which he responded that it was his 'job' as a Moderator to treat them in such a manner, and that was only after he called said users "children" and "stupid". He habitually restarts closed discussions (TU3 can confirm this), without new evidence (which would make it okay), usually to flame other users for their decisions or the site as a whole. He is an argument instigator: one needs look no further than the talk pages of any of the hot button issues of recent memory to find examples of this (or anything else I've mentioned in this post). He frequently makes all sysops the targets of his rampages and has a known dislike for most of them, myself included.

And all of this is said to illustrate the fact that, while he is an active and avid contributor, he is, in no way, fit or responsible to wield sysop rights in any shape or form.