User talk:BerserkerPhantom

Welcome
Hello, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Hypothetical Battle: Nagato vs Itachi page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.


 * Here are several other pages that can help you with where to begin-


 * Wiki Activity – A great first stop, because you can see what pages other people have been editing, and where you can help out.


 * Help Pages - If you're new to editing or having trouble getting something to work, the help pages are a great place to start.


 * Forums - The forums are used for a number of things, from proposing policy changes to general wiki discussions. Please use Naruto Answers for asking general questions.


 * Administrators - A list of 's administrators. If you need additional assistance or are having troubles, feel free to contact an administrator with the details.


 * Special:Upload - A page that provides you a form for uploading images easily.

Always sign in before you edit – This is so that we can recognize you!

Always sign your posts - When leaving a message on someone's talk page, remember to sign it by clicking either the 'signature' button or by typing four tildes ( ). This is so the person knows who to reply to.

There's a lot to do around here, so we hope you'll stay with us and make many more contributions. And again, welcome to. Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Omnibender (talk) 17:36, March 26, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Yello
Yo. The thing is that if said edit doesn't add anything to article, than it IS unnecessary. Simple as that. --JouXIII (talk) 14:16, March 27, 2016 (UTC)

RE:The Program
Don't sweat it. I've been busy myself.Cloudtheavenger (talk) 06:21, March 28, 2016 (UTC)

Some advice <...>
well, does this mean one of us have to remove the literal meaning on the infobox that doesn't shown entirely? Kunoichi101 (talk) 21:19, April 30, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Storm 4 Q&A
There have been very few sources for Storm 4 combo names. There are a few, one of them is Kurama Arm Attack, but you'd have to check how it is in the game, and then compare to what he did in the game. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:28, April 30, 2016 (UTC)

flash-forward
Ackchyually, the opening scene is the current time and the young Boruto stuff is a flashback. • Seelentau 愛 議 18:22, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, technically, we should display Boruto's looks from the intro and not from the flashback... • Seelentau 愛 議 20:14, May 4, 2016 (UTC)

Re: TCG?
It's the least reliable official source, but it's an official source, yes. It goes like this: Manga > databook > canon movie > anime > anime filler, movies & video games > TCG. Basically, I would really only use TCG names if there's nothing else available but the technique is distinctive enough to warrant its own article. I did that for Coercion Sharingan, for example. • Seelentau 愛 議 16:14, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Since the databooks give him no rank, that information is obviously wrong.
 * The question is, where do we stop? We have no set rules as to when a technique warrants its own article and when not. Technically, all of Sai's techniques could simply link to the Choju Giga article. We give them each their own article so that the "mother" article isn't overflowing with information, to make the information more accessible and attractive to the visitors. If, however, a new article only consists of one sentence and no additional information like rank or Kanji or so, there's no need for it.
 * So basically, the more unique information there is, the more viable is a unique article. • Seelentau 愛 議 16:28, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Technically, there are no real rules as to when a technique gets its own article and when it doesn't, as I said. And I'm really not sure a TCG name is enough to warrant an article... but you'll be met with heavy opposition if you merge them^^ • Seelentau 愛 議 21:11, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would be a valid argument. But nevertheless, we really need a consensus for when an article is viable and when it's better left in its mother article. • Seelentau 愛 議 21:16, May 6, 2016 (UTC)

Edit Warring
Stop acting like a new user and discuss the matter on the talk page before acting. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 17:06, May 6, 2016 (UTC)

Deletion tags
The pages you marked for deletion were named via Naruto Collectible Card Game. --Rai 水 (talk) 18:02, May 6, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Chapter References
"I suggest you go elsewhere, like...you know: How you said you'd leave, left an entire sh@tstorm on the forums then played it off like nothing had happened..."

Yes. --Jizo 悟 (talk) 02:13, May 8, 2016 (UTC)

Forum Warning #1
BerserkerPhantom, personal attacks will not be tolerated. That warning would have come directly from me if Sarutobii2 hadn't already done it. Please re-read the forum and talkpage policies and refrain from personally insulting other users within discussions.


 * Personal attacks are explicitly prohibited in the forum policy: "Do not troll or flame other users. If your message is intended to instigate a reaction from the opposing user or is clearly intended to insult someone else, it will be removed and may result in an immediate revocation of your right to post in the forums or edit the wiki."
 * We even have a note on moderators: "Respect the decisions of forum moderators and sysops. Responding with sarcasm or ridicule if they tell you to not do something may lead to you receiving warnings or having your ability to use the forums or wiki revoked. | If you have a problem with a forum moderator or sysop's decision, politely discuss it with them and get other forum moderators and sysops involved if necessary."
 * Warnings given by moderators are **not** spam by any definition. Only real spam (bot spam, etc...) and overt harassment is allowed to be removed from talkpages. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 14:25, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Sarutobii2 has falsely accused me of doing so, tho. If you backtracked the thread and checked out the comment, you'd know. Telling someone that they weren't able to read the message even when it was repeated 5 times in the actual thread is not in any way rude behaviour or a violation of the policies.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 14:27, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * "#ReadingIsHardForSaru" is a personal attack. You are not calling out an issue with communication, you are directly insinuating that another person on the wiki has reading difficulties, using that as an insult rather than trying to assist communication with them, and formatting it as a hashtag to further increase its weight as an insult. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 14:34, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * That is completely wrong and biased. I pointed out that he didn't bother reading the messages and kept calling me a liar, despite me pointing out exactly what needed to be pointed out ~5 times, and he chose to ignore it and blatantly state what was not the case, hence "it's clearly difficult for him to read the messages accordingly". Hashtags don't work on the wiki regardless.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 14:38, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * He did not personally call you a "liar". He stated an opinion that you were "lying" in direct combination with references to what he believed to be falsehoods. You elevated this to a direct personal attack by tacking on an insult in a place it was completely unnecessary. The fact that this wiki has no hashtag functionality is not an excuse; you formatted in the way that is culturally known as a hashtag, in a place where it doesn't even have a functional purpose as one. This separates it from the actual sentence of conversation and makes the insult one tacked on at the end; where if you had been civil, you could have trivially chosen to omit. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 14:54, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * In no shape of form was that an opinion, and if it was - then this is even more of an opinion that his is(?). He repeated it twice as well, even after I cleared it up the first time, hence - clearly trying to force an argument. And, as I've said already, it's not a personal attack, it's a jab at the point that he completely ignored comments that prove his accusations as completely false and absent minded, per "it's clearly difficult for him to read the messages accordingly"... If anything, he showed complete disrespect towards a fellow user by ignoring words and blatantly complaining and accusing about stuff he should've not complained or accused about in the first place. As pointed out by a different user as a "round-in-circles discussion" - that's because Sarutobii2 refused to read the responses to questions he initiated, leading the thread completely nowhere and completely off-topic.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 14:59, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * Jabbing at another person that way is a personal attack. What you personally consider it as is irrelevant, it is a personal attack. And even if you had been personally attacked it does not permit you to respond with a personal attack; incivility is dealt with by contacting a mod or sysop, not by responding with incivility.
 * This point is closed, politely refrain from further personal attacks in the forums or you will not be permitted use of the wiki. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 15:13, May 8, 2016 (UTC)

Boruto
No speculation. Nowhere it was told that Byakugan, more it isn't active.--Sharingan91 (talk) 20:11, May 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Check 'ur talk page :p--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 20:12, May 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * I have read.--Sharingan91 (talk) 20:13, May 19, 2016 (UTC)

re:???
Sort of... I was testing something and was about to undo it, but you got ahead of me. --JouXIII (talk) 19:40, June 16, 2016 (UTC)

Talkpage Input 2
If you could add your input into this talkpage and this talkpage? I'll be much appreciated. Thank you. --Rai 水 (talk) 03:47, June 19, 2016 (UTC)