Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-30355627-20170312130432/@comment-9782468-20170407233401

Rachin123 wrote: @AsianReaper

I have to disagree with the Zabuza thing. Zabuza was stronger than Kakashi, as shown in his first confrontation, and even stats reflect that. If anything, it was Zabuza who got nerfed in the second fight.

I agree, Kakashi should have been able to handle Hidan, considering his speed was a 4.5 and Hidan's was 3.5. He also had the Sharingan as well.

I agree with Kakuzu to a degree. Considering Kakashi had the Sharingan, and better taijutsu and speed in stats, he should have beat Kakuzu in those areas. However, Kakuzu's ninjutsu is way too much for Kakashi, so that's where I draw the line. As for Naruto beating Kakuzu. Everyone knows that was plot.

I agree that Danzo should have killed Sasuke. If it were not for plot he would have. Considering how much he's been through, Sasuke should have never been able to manifest Susanoo. While I agree that Kakashi should have been able to defeat Sasuke with no problem after Danzo's death, Kakashi cannot beat a full powered MS Sasuke. I can definitely see most of your points with the people except for Zabuza.

At the time in the story, Kakashi still had 3 full points on Zabuza in the databooks.

I mean, when I said stronger, I didn't mean physically. I meant overall Shinobi battle capabilities. Zabuza was stronger physically but in a full on battle to the death, Kakashi had what it took to take him down, I think.

Of course, he did note that he hadn't faced someone of Zabuza's calibre in a long time, so maybe he just was off guard