User talk:Kiba91

The protection of Kiba's page has been removed. You should be abel to edit it now. Jacce 05:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I see, you can't edit because the page was protected. But, I think you talked to Jacce, right? Well, first things first, yes, I do like to talk. Second, I'm not a sysop (a.k.a. admin), and third, my time in this wikia is going to be pretty often now. So, yep! IF you need help, talk to Jacce, User Talk: TheUltimate3, or...me!. Greetings to this wikia as well! Hope you have fun! ^_^ --Rasengan888 (talk) (Narutopedia Editor) 20:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

P.S. You can also find me at the Naruto Fanon, for some reason, a bug has prevented from me to go to it. I'm fixing it though...hard to get it out though...

Wiiii! Thank you both!!! =D Thanks a lot!!! ^^ And sure i'll have fun, i like this wikia very much! hehe, and when i'll have a question or comment, now i know who i'm going to talk :)

Thanks again!! And to you too Jacce!!! :D and i will visit you at Naruto Fanon :) Thanks again and hope we can talk more :) --Kiba91 21:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:
I removed the information in the first place because most of it is useless; example: a paragraph-long description on an argument Kiba has with Sora that contributes nothing to the plot. You restored all of it because you feel Kiba needs eight pages of plot synopsis. If there is a specific part that I removed that you feel should be re-added, do so. ~SnapperTo 05:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I am removing useless information from other character articles (characters A → Ko completed). Kiba's article is the only one I've had problems with. I removed the line about him impressing Kakashi because it already says that in the Abilities section. I did not remove that he survived Pain's attack. I removed the line about him believing in Naruto because that has no impact on the plot. If you want explanations about other removals, feel free to ask.
 * Sorry if I sound disrespectful or rude, but I don't think "he's my favorite character!" is a good excuse to use on a wiki. ~SnapperTo 04:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Neji starts with N, which comes after K, so I haven't gotten to it yet.
 * If you'll look at Kiba's ability section, I am only combining two short sections into one. If you can somehow make either of the two sections longer, splitting them up again (as is done with Hinata's article) would be fine. Also, that Hinata is concerned for Naruto is relevant since she loves Naruto and is almost killed because of it. Kiba does not have that problem.
 * I asked you to restore specific parts if you felt they were important. You instead restored the entire second half of the article regardless of what changes I made earlier. Respecting each other's edits is a two-way street; when you restored who Kiba is teamed with and how he figures out he's being watched by bats, I had no problem with it. Now you can find something that I added (or removed) to not have a problem with. Pretty please? ~SnapperTo 05:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Hey
So what is your problem? Jacce 05:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Kiba Inuzuka
Kiba91, the Kiba Inuzuka page was protected because you were revert warring. Our policy is to lave an article at the previous state it was in when protecting due to a revert war, thus your latest edits were reverted.

You have not bothered to take discussion to a proper location. When an article is in dispute take discussion to the article's talk page and refrain from reverting other users. You have not bothered to take a proper community discussion to the talkpage, you have not bothered to communicate fully with other users (You haven't after Snapper2's most recent comment to you, you continued to revert war and made no response; And instead of talking to me, one involved, you sidestepped and went to the uninvolved Jacce), and you have not been civil or coherent with your comments.

Please take a civil community discussion to the Talk:Kiba Inuzuka page. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 2, 2009 @ 02:40 (UTC)


 * First revert is fine, revert is how we get rid of bad edits. Unreverting something is where the problem starts and revert wars break out because people don't discuss things. Snapper2 even made attempts to improve the article by only undoing parts of the edit and suggesting you put back small pieces, you responded by just completely reverting his compromise.
 * When more than one person is reverting you, it is even less reason to revert, it means you are one person going against multiple members of the community, that point should be a signal that you are in a minority and should be attempting to talk with all the people involved and taking a discussion to the talkpage where everyone can get involved. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 2, 2009 @ 03:55 (UTC)
 * Yes, two users aren't the entire community, but when one user is constantly revert warring with two others it's a signal that it is no longer a 1 vs. 1 argument and that 1 user is starting to push his opinion against those of multiple others. In 90% of the cases I see here where one user is reverting against multiple the end result is that the community decides the user was pushing his personal opinion.
 * Whatever the case is, the fact is you unreverted a revert without discussion. The moment an edit of yours is reverted you should be thinking "Something I did was undone, perhaps I should put my edit on hold and go to the article's talkpage to get a third opinion on the edit", not "I was reverted, I'll just unrevert it" that! is where a revert war starts. The revertee is the first person with a good chance to start a proper discussion, the reverter is normally not that person because a large number of the users a reverter ends up needing to revert are the ones that wont participate in a discussion, much less start one.
 * Article talkpages are for discussion on the article, that is where discussion should go (feel free to poke people involved to participate in the discussion). So take your arguments to Talk:Kiba Inuzuka where they can be discussed. Users will chime in, piles of people watch the rc, and our community portal even lists active talkpages, that's what's relevant. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 2, 2009 @ 04:38 (UTC)
 * Take a look at the history tab, you can use it to select a diff. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 2, 2009 @ 22:41 (UTC)
 * Right next to the edit button. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 3, 2009 @ 03:59 (UTC)

Re:Hi
Well the page was blocked because of you and Snappers Edit War. So eh. Not sure what to do there.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 22:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Ino Jutsu
I took em off becuz they're not real techniques and they've only been used once and not one of her primary jutsu AMTNinja (talk) 02:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Ki
Yeah, there was a brief lapse while I sorted that out. Kiho's image was named "Kigiri" and Kigiri's image was named "Nurari". I had to move one before I could move the other. It's been fixed. ~SnapperTo 04:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: New arc
Hi! I'm fine, hope you are to. I would say that Pain invasion arc is over, and we might need a new name for the next arc (we are using "post Pain invasion" now). The thing is just to come up with a name, something that would belong on the plots talk page. Jacce | Talk 05:03, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

RE: ...
I undid your edit because you made up a arc name, and instead of having som1 forget about it later, i reverted it so we could wait till we come to an agreement on all the articles to have the same arc name. Simant (talk) 01:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Utakata
Neither page should have said the two jinchūriki might have known each other. I removed then information from Yagura's page as well. --ShounenSuki (talk 18:55, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: New Image
I suggest you upload the image, ad and  templates, and places it on the article. If it is good we keep it, if it is bad it will be removed. Jacce | Talk 06:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Nice pics, all of them. For the eight man squad I suggest you use the second one. Jacce | Talk 04:20, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

It isn't that hard, just ad  . Jacce | Talk 05:23, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Image deletion: KibaduringtheHunt forItachiArc.jpg
Kiba91, the image KibaduringtheHunt forItachiArc.jpg which you uploaded has been deleted. We suggest you look over our image policy before you upload another image to make sure you aren't breaking any part of the policy. ..--AlienGamer--Talk-- 16:42, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Image deletion: Kiba Shippuden Hunt for Itachi Arc.JPG
Kiba91, the image Kiba Shippuden Hunt for Itachi Arc.JPG which you uploaded has been tagged for deletion. Please see the image page for deletion notes. We suggest you look over our image policy and ask that you make an attempt to fix the issues you are causing. ..--AlienGamer--Talk-- 08:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: Image deletion: Kiba Shippuden Hunt for Itachi Arc.JPG

 * One image was deleted cause it was a duplicate of another one u uploaded...The other oneis onlytagged for deletion..It hasn't been deleted yet....The reason its not used in the articles is cause it lacks a fair use rationale or a license...It needs both of them for it to be able to be put into articles....U can still add them......--AlienGamer--Talk-- 18:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

The above is a rationale...Just Copy And Paste It To The Summary Box, When Uploading an image, making the necessary adjusments i.e, the one's in brackets... As For the license, Below the Summary Box, there's a dropdown called Licensing:...select wat the license u need is....If Its an episode pic select under fair use, select Tv Screenshots. If its from an artbook, databook or manga under Fair use select Comic/Manga Scans/Captures.

Generally these are added, when u upload the image, but since u've allready uploaded it, Edit the image page, and add the above rationale under a heading called summary...after u do that, under the license type,  ...Its really easy after u do it once or twice...--AlienGamer--Talk-- 18:29, 8 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Awesome...U did it....Now do watevr u want with the image :)...--AlienGamer--Talk-- 18:37, 8 August 2009 (UTC)


 * If its somewhere in the article (not the infobox), select the place u want to put i, and add [[Image:(Name of the image)|thumb|(left/right)|(A small discription)]] ...--AlienGamer--Talk-- 18:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * In the end the coding should look like: [[Image:Kiba Shippuden Hunt for Itachi Arc.JPG|thumb|right|An Image of Kiba]] ..--AlienGamer--Talk-- 18:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No Problem, and i'm sure they will...--AlienGamer--Talk-- 18:48, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: kiba

 * its allready stated that he's fast, there's no need to futher exaggerate it...you dont have to say he's one of the fastest.. Madara stated Kakashi, and Sasuke to be fast. Its stated in their page, but we dont say "one of the fastest in the series" thats a biased point of view...--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 18:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * As for your second comment. Show a bit of patience. this is the second time on my count your impatience has gotten the better of you. the first wud be the whirlwind wolf fang tech. Before u think of doing something, y dont u wait for a bit. U hardly gave me 2 mins to answer u'r question, before u reedited Kiba's page and accused me in my talkpage...--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 18:45, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Its allready been states that he's fast...There's no need to futher state the same point. Here are examples of fast shinobi, who are likely faster than Kiba
 * Naruto in sage mode
 * Naruto in fox mode
 * Guy (with & without the 8 gates tech)
 * Madara
 * Lee (without weights, with eight gates)
 * Sasuke
 * Kakashi
 * thats all i can think of now....all i'm saying is, that we dont say in any of their pages "one of the fastest ninja in the series", it says fast, and that should suffice. ..--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 18:55, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You still dont get it....u u'r self mentioned that he's surpassed by Guy, and equalled by Kakashi, Lee and Sasuke. Allthough in my opinion Naruto is faster in fox & sage mode but foget that, as it's irrelavant. In all 4 ppl mentioned above, not in one of their pages do we state "one of the fastest in the series." Thats BIASED info. And u r being biased as u'r a Kiba fan. I just read the arguments u've had with Snapper over the Same page. That went as far as Dantman had to intevine at one point. Listen...We write articles in an unbiased way. Forget that he's u'r fav character, and treat it like any other page. I'm an Itachi fan. Doesn't mean I go around stating in his page "the best genjutsu user" or anything of that sort. Make edits unbiased. ..--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 19:20, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. I dont have a problem with the new version. Infact, i even corrected a few grammer and spelling errors. ..--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 19:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

i!H
I redirected it. The page history can still be found here. When you can say with 100% certainty that it is either a jutsu or a weapon, feel free to restore it. ~SnapperTo 18:41, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Re:Hi

 * Read this..--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 01:54, September 4, 2009 (UTC)


 * I've already fixed it...--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 02:10, September 4, 2009 (UTC)

Reply
I know it's out. Read warning in the main page. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:16, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * It doesn't change the rules of the wiki. I too think that if it has been released in a website, we should be able to update accordingly, but alas, we can't. If you don't like it, I suggest taking it up to a sysop. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:36, October 9, 2009 (UTC)