Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-732150-20180901052416

BEWARE OF ANIME SPOILERS FOR THE MITSUKI ARC

I've meant to bring this topic earlier, but I've been busy with some other stuff. So, based on promotional material, similar to the one we first saw Kagura Karatachi and Shizuma Hoshigaki, we got a look at four new characters and their names. You might recognise them from the current ending. Two of them are names we already use for one-off characters, Sekiei and Kokuyō. Based on the characters having the same name alone, I believe the one-offs have to be renamed. My suggestions are "Sekiei (Kumogakure)"/"Sekiei (spectator)" and "Kokuyō (puppeteer)". Based on SPOILERS in the link, we might have a clear indication of what to name the new Sekiei and Kokuyō already in a similar format for the "looking for" notices. However, we do have another option. Since they're likely to be recurring characters and have a bigger role, documenting them means they'll be mentioned far more often than Kumogakure spectator and puppeteer, we could simply leave them without additional identifiers, meaning no unnecessary link piping for everything related to this arc. It would also mean all four new characters will have simple article names. What does the community think? I myself am ok with either one, but I do prefer link piping avoidance.

Relating to the SPOILERS other than renaming issue above, while I'm excited about learning more about SPOILERS given we don't actually know a lot about it, the anime's history has taught me to dread them saying stuff that doesn't make sense and contradicts established information, a la Kaguya/Hagoromo flashback arc. 