Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-25139119-20140915033602/@comment-25382671-20140921210306

WindStar7125 wrote:

Exactly my point. You won't bother to explain because, like @Tau said multiple times before, no one knows the full capabilities of the Six Paths Power. Until someone does, there is no "perfect explanation." @HagoromoOtsutsuki, get some popcorn and a soda for this. @Blaezej, whether this is your main language or not, I'll make this clear to you: why don't you actually contribute to the wiki more, rather than get on my case in the forums just because I have a question? Not everything can be rationalized. I got @Foxie's explanation, but not once did he fully explain all capabilities of the Six Paths Power, now did he? So until you or someone else can explain that to me and everyone else who is confused on this subject, work on improving the wiki rather than talk to me about "perfect explanations" on the forums. I don't know if you have noticed, but it is incredibly rude to accuse others of having "petty thinking" just because they are confused on a subject. This is a discussion, and debates happen. Sure, we "argue over every little thing," and eventually we reach a consensus, FYI. What are you doing to help this wiki? Not much at the moment. Just claiming others have "petty thinking" because we're confused on a subject. I take offense when someone singles me out for my opinion among others, but I'll take even more offense when a random editor who comes out of nowhere does things that don't help the wiki at all. As a relatively new editor with a very little amount of edits, instead of coming here and starting out with a know-it-all attitude (which I certainly have no patience for), I suggest you make yourself useful by helping the wiki. You, who hasn't even reached triple-digits in edits, are absolutely in no position to accuse us longtime editors for "petty thinking."

I'll grant you 2 things: Maybe I was rather rude towards you, but that was not my intention. For that I apologize. Secondly, wheter I'm a regular editor or not, it doesn't really matter when it comes to a debate, so unless you yourself is acting out of the attitude which you considered rude, then how many edits I make shouldn't change anything about this debate.

Now back to the points that you have made, I had no problem understanding TenTailedFox's point of view, and so for me it was indeed perfect.

Unless we find ourselves in a situation where Kishi explains every little thing (which I'm sure won't happen in this case), then we can say for sure wheter TTF's (or anyone's, for that matter) logic is right or wrong. For me it works, and so it suffices. If it doesn't work for you, that's too bad, and also your problem. I see now that I was wrong to try and convince you, or whatever. But I've said that already.

My point is: for me it works, if it doesn't work for you, too bad. I was rude to you? My apologies, it was not my intention in the least. But then again, you answer my rudeness with your own sort of a complex of superiority, which I certainly couldn't care less, for this Wiki, or anything online, for that matter, isn't something I cannot live without. I do like it here, but that's no reason for you to think that you're better than a newbie like me or whatever it is that is going through your head right now.

Either way, I do believe that we've strayed far too much from the topic, and if you wish to keep discussing this with me, you're welcome to contact me in private... actually, you should be the one preaching that, since you're such an old, respected member of this community.

Edit: Changed "sense of grandeur" to "complex of superiority". Second edit: Grammar.