User talk:Rachin123

Re: Talk
You cannot remove any messages from your talkpage, but you may archive it (however, you cannot edit the archive and remove messages). To archive, click the arrow next to "Leave Message" and select Archive. Then, select the areas you want to archive and click Save Archive. --Sajuuk Talk Page 20:45, November 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * No, nobody can remove any messages from your talkpage, per Talkpage policy. You can only remove a message if it violates the Wikia TOU and warning notices about local wiki policy violations are not removable under the TOU. --Sajuuk Talk Page 20:58, November 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ohhh! Sorry about that, yes you can remove the deletion tag if you don't see it violation any policies. :) --Sajuuk Talk Page 21:05, November 5, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Chōchō
No female in the clan has the markings. • Seelentau 愛 議 19:54, November 7, 2014 (UTC)

re: Magnet Release
But there is nothing to argue about, Wind+Earth is Magnet, if you don't like it then send a message to the author and don't blame me for your personal problems.--Elve Talk Page 20:27, November 14, 2014 (UTC)

The question goes back at you: who do you think you are? You think your opinion is more valid than the author's? Once and if there's a good reason to suspect that he made a mistake with this, then it should be discussed, but not now.--Elve Talk Page 20:40, November 14, 2014 (UTC)

Tell me one reason why I should even care what you believe. And yes, the author did state Wind+Earth=Magnet through Rasa, since it's the only unused combination that he has--Elve Talk Page 21:37, November 14, 2014 (UTC)

So you need Kishi to take a plane, land near your house, sit on your lap and quietly whisper into your ear that Magnet is Wind+Earth in order to believe it? It was never directly stated that Boil is Fire+Water, by your logic that too should be removed--Elve Talk Page 11:59, November 15, 2014 (UTC)

edit
In regards to JOA's reversion: your edit was technically against the Manual of Style. Writing links to bypass redirects should not be done and instead of reverting his edit back to an edit which violated the style guidelines, you should have simply fixed the links (as he eventually did) so that they did not bypass redirects. is redirect bypass because  redirects to Wind Release. Just some helpful information. --Sajuuk Talk Page 07:57, November 19, 2014 (UTC)

RE:Sasori edit
The Akatsuki back story OVA heavily contradicts the story like Orochimaru vs Hidan so i presumed the same goes for Sasori vs Konan but i'll re-add the image just in case im wrong. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 01:46, November 26, 2014 (UTC)

Why did you re add that image of Sasori vs Tatewaki? He's blury, barely in the image and not mention he's not doing anything. The image holds no significant importance. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 15:23, November 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * The quality of the image isn't the issue its the importance which doesn't seem that important considering its anime only content. You added the Sasori vs Konan image to Sasori's history section and now its clutterd with images. Does it really matter to you if there's 1 less image? --Sarutobii2 (talk) 17:54, November 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * If i believed anime only images shouldn't be in articles then i would remove the 3/4 anime only images from Sasori's history section. I never said his article section was cluttered, only his history section which is considering each paragraph has a image attached. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 18:18, November 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * Well having 1 image doesnt make it clutterd does it? So obviously 4 does.... I brought up it being clutterd as another reason why we should remove the image. The original issue is what i said above. If you say this fight is important, then why dont you upload a image of them actually fighting? --Sarutobii2 (talk) 18:41, November 29, 2014 (UTC)

Suggestion
I suggest you use Special:WhatLinksHere if you haven't done so already. You can take the old movie names from this thread, then copy and paste them into the "Page:" tab to find articles that still have the old movie names you are trying to revise and change. ~• WS7125 [Mod] 04:45, November 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * I see you keep changing your avatar... anyway, another suggestion: When locating the pages with the old movie names in Special:WhatLinksHere, I suggest you open those pages in new tabs, then edit them all to make multiple edits in less than a minute and get the job done faster. ~• WS7125 [Mod]WindStar7125 Task.svgWindStar7125's Task.svg 17:29, November 27, 2014 (UTC)

Re: To be or not to be a clan member
For example, Minato isn't part of the Uzumaki clan just because he married Kushina. Hashirama isn't part of the Uzumaki clan because he married Mito. Women take the male's surname (at least, that's how it works in the real world) and marry into the male's clan. What you were doing was putting males into the female's clan, such as Naruto with the Hyūga clan and Sai with the Yamanaka clan. Doesn't work that way. Mito married into the Senju clan. Hashirama didn't marry into the Uzumaki clan. Women marry into men's clans and take the male's surname, not the other way around. ~• WS7125 [Mod] 05:06, November 28, 2014 (UTC)

Desert Layered Imperial Funeral Seal
Why are reversed, the technique cannot be considered Magnet release that Gaara doesn't have this element.--YasakaMagatama (talk) 22:15, December 3, 2014 (UTC)

Oh yes it is classified because of Jiton of Shukaku, at that time he used against Madara the technique had this release involved. Thanks Rachin. :)--YasakaMagatama (talk) 22:33, December 3, 2014 (UTC)

tip
Hey. When giving warnings for policy violations to other users, please use, and. --Sajuuk Talk Page 18:19, December 5, 2014 (UTC)

leaving chat
why you left chat? poke--Legacyhunters (talk) 05:34, December 11, 2014 (UTC)

chat
can u get on chat? --Sajuuk Talk Page 21:44, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^ Again. --Sajuuk Talk Page 18:52, December 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^ Again :) --Sajuuk Talk Page 00:19, December 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * And again. --Sajuuk Talk Page 19:25, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

re: ages
The databook, which advances a number of characters' ages by one year, does not advance the ages of characters such as Kotetsu and Hana. Therefore, their ages should not be advanced by the wiki. ~SnapperTo 07:39, December 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * That's great and everything, but again, the databook doesn't increase their ages when it could have. The wiki's only responsibility is to report the series, not "correct" it. ~SnapperTo 07:57, December 20, 2014 (UTC)

Arc
Is there any easier way to read your arc? It looks fun.Eric Burrell (talk) 21:26, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

Well the thread is no longer available. So I think you should leave the links on my page.Eric Burrell (talk) 21:40, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

Any progress on the script?Eric Burrell (talk) 21:15, January 4, 2015 (UTC)

Letting you know
I see you've made an edit on the Naruto Fanon Wiki. Just letting you know, that's Foxie's wiki, so please, try not to get into it with him too much over there like you do here. ~• WS7125 [Mod] 00:01, January 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I noticed you removed it. Technically, Gemnist's fanon thread was closed by SuperSajuuk, but TU3 re-opened it on a whim (likely because he was interested). But if anyone creates a fanfiction thread again, I'll just close it. There's the Naruto Fanon Wiki for that, as you have realized. And also, about TTF, that's my point. He is the bureaucrat of the Naruto Fanon Wiki, and oversees and decides everything like Dantman does here, so if he "bothers" you there, I advise you do not challenge him. It will not end well. Just a heads up. ~• WS7125 [Mod]WindStar7125 Task.svgWindStar7125's Task.svg 00:14, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

Thread Closed and the Challenge
Yo. Since your thread was closed (because of kinda foolish reasons), would it be possible for you to send it to me via e-mail or post it on the fanon wiki? I would really like to see what you came up with:)--Omojuze (talk) 19:56, January 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah I've seen it. You officially lost the bet, but I would still like to see your ideas and read the story:)--Omojuze (talk) 20:18, January 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * The biographies? Yeah, i saw 'em. Don't think that it was this important to go this in-depth with appearances (with the exception of new characters), but nonetheless, sounds cool:) Whenever you update, could you lemme know?--Omojuze (talk) 20:32, January 1, 2015 (UTC)