Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-45510280-20200416210937/@comment-26636534-20200421124905

@Jason

But Obito did lie when he told Sasuke that the Kyuubi attack on the leaf was a "natural occurrence". So what does your post mean?

@Legion

Lol, I find it hilarious that you still feel the need to address me. Thanks for your concern. The record shows that you have unsupported statements about me and the points where you "tell me what my opinion/post must be", which I corrected you by saying what I really meant. So all I see is you @Legion having a misplaced sense of authority on what I should mean, instead of actually taking my clarified stance.

Well, not that I have to, just let me show you how you continue to be wrong about the record. ________________________________________________________________________

Legion: You are telling others how to view canon because wiki policy.

Ninja: ''I should have pointed out that the OP can decide for themselves and do their own research. And at no point did I try to "enforce authority", as the record shows I stated my opinion. So you claiming I was, is false, and my clarification shows I wasn't ignoring the novel statement. (L:-2: N:1) ''

Legion: So concerned that you ignored me stating what canon usually is and how i explicitly state constantly that canon and authorship have been blurred since NEP.

Ninja Of War wrote:

@Legion

I find it strange that you criticize me for using the canon policy and related definitions for canon, explaining my point of view with examples. While your latest post shows you defining canon and telling another user examples of contradictions between the various mediums, showing your point of view lol.

As shown, I merely pointed out your double standards of "criticism" against me and how I find it strange. But go on, try more falsehoods lol.