User talk:OmegaRasengan

Land of This minister
Will you create the page for the minister? --Vecanoi (talk) 19:41, April 18, 2013 (UTC)

Re:SuperSaiyaMan's Speculative Edits
You're going to have to be more specific than that. I don't know what speculative edits you're talking about as I just woke up and checked the wiki. ~ Ten Tailed Fox 10:52, August 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * That's.... not really speculation. It was stated in the manga. Kishi doesn't put random blurbs in there for "might be's". If he says something might be Yin-Yang Release, then 99.9999% of the time; its Yin-Yang Release. I thought you meant he was adding off the wall stuff again. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Yamagakure Symbol.svg 15:42, August 7, 2013 (UTC)

Re: "Different kanji, not the same technique"
In the game, the technique is called. Not sure of which rōmaji is the correct one, but if I'm leaning towards suijun, since there's a wordplay with that one. The thing with game techniques having different names is that usually those are techniques which are given canon names after they debut in the game. In this case, the technique had a canon name from day 1. Besides, the effect isn't the same. In the game, the water just makes the shield and stays there. Of course, this could be simply for game reasons, but it still has a different name. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:12, August 8, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Images
Hi, I have noticed that quite a lot of the images you upload are not very good quality and are low resolution, where do you watch your episodes? They look like they were watched on YouTube. --Speysider Talk Page 12:32, August 29, 2013 (UTC)

Chapter 646 Viz translation
Hi, can you provide us with the Viz's translation of Tobirama's water technique as well as Viz name of the Sage, his mother and Shinju? Thanks so much. http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/a553/anaspet06/Shakhmootssign_zps2a261e68.png (Contact) 14:00, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

More Viz translations
Also, can you provide us with the Viz's name of Big Ball Rasenshuriken and Sword of Nunoboko? Thanks in advance. — Shakhmoot  (Talk) 20:24, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Anime-Manga Differences
Please add references to the anime AND manga when adding differences. I will comment it out for now. — S im A nt 00:12, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Redirects
Instead of moving existing redirects, please just create a redirect at whatever new name you want. Less work for everyone. ~SnapperTo 08:58, December 21, 2013 (UTC)

Tobirama/Senbon
We are having a discussion on the subject. Stop being counterproductive and actually add to the wikia discussion. We cannot be discussing one thing and have the wiki saying something else.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 17:10, January 18, 2014 (UTC)

RP: Speculations?
What speculations? This chapter, both Hiruzen and Spiral Zetsu used all five Nature Transformations simultaneously. How is that speculation?--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 07:43, January 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh that. Sorry, I had a brainfart and I thought Spiral Zetsu had fused with Black Zetsu and Obito to do that, hence why I said 'Rinnegan user'. That was a mistake, and I'm sorry.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 07:51, January 22, 2014 (UTC)

Yes
Yes, yes I am serious TY. Munchvtec 13:46, January 23, 2014 (UTC)munchvtec

re: lord cerez's ego
Nah, it's just some harmless friendly bromance--Elveonora (talk) 19:41, February 13, 2014 (UTC)

Archiving
When archiving your talkpage, use the automatic system on the drop down menu, next to Leave Message. Your archive pages are named wrongly, which is breaking the ArchiveList box (they should be titled as Archive 1, not Archive1), which would have been avoided if the automatic system was used. --Speysider Talk Page 18:26, February 27, 2014 (UTC)

Re: "baka"
Can you give me link(s) for the signature/apology business? ~SnapperTo 23:06, March 1, 2014 (UTC)


 * I did advise him to give disclaimers in discussions you were both involved in. Without a better idea of where to find him making one of those disclaimers aggressive, I'm going to assume it was unintentional.
 * In my own searches, I still find an absence of evidence that he's being hostile to you without cause. He actually seems to walk delicately when it comes to edits you've made, either seeking others' opinion before acting or making a point to explain his reasoning. You, on the other hand, seem to leap down his throat quite readily. Why is that?
 * Based on what I have seen, I am satisfied that Cerez is keeping up his side of the bargain to leave you alone. Did he call you some snide name? Apparently so. But he did not do so without provocation; you are the one who is failing to be polite.
 * So please, try harder to assume good faith. ~SnapperTo 02:39, March 2, 2014 (UTC)


 * As I said, I do not see evidence of that. What I do see is this, and this, and this. You are coming off as the baiter and not the baitee. ~SnapperTo 04:49, March 2, 2014 (UTC)


 * You keep accusing him of starting things. Why? Give me some links that warrant your behavior to him. Because this is the sequence of events as I currently see them:
 * Cerez edits the same article as you.
 * You become angry.
 * Cerez calls you names.
 * If I'm going to do something about step 3 like you asked, I first need to do something about step 2. You allude to step 2 being a result of step 1, but you need to provide specific examples that justify that. ~SnapperTo 06:39, March 2, 2014 (UTC)

Might Dai
I know the Viz will release today's chapter on the next Monday. So, if possible. Can you provide us with Dai's name when released? I think they will change his name to something else like Gai to Guy. — Shakhmoot  (Talk) 14:01, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Might DUI, huehue. Seelentau 愛議 15:02, March 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Bump. — Shakhmoot Nadeshiko Village Symbol.svg (Talk) 05:07, March 17, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Answers
Bloody hell when did all that happen? (Don't answer, I can read the time logs.) Oh, why must the children fight when I'm not around with the majestic hammer of justice?--TheUltimate3 (talk) 18:40, March 12, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Combination UJ names
Naruto Storm Revolution: New Interview with Gameplay; if you watch closely in the second video (you will have to continually click the pause button when the character selection screen is shown, at around the 50 second mark), you can see these names. I posted this link in some of the edit summaries I made, in particular the ones on the main Naruto Shippūden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Revolution page, as well as the Wind and Lightning Release: Hurricane Lightning page. --ScruffyC (talk) 04:38, April 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * For future reference, and ScruffyC that goes for you too, when putting those YouTube links as sources for names, YouTube has this useful feature if you select share below the video, where it gives you a shortened URL, which you can further custumise by having it add the specific timeframe. It helps pinpoint the moment where you have to pause quickly the video instead of watching the entire video. For example, right now, it would be useful to know where in the video for Tailed Beast Planetary Rasenshuriken we get the romaji. Can you hear Naruto saying it at some point? Or did you add it based on the English name? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:50, April 29, 2014 (UTC)

Repeated violations of Spoiler policy

 * It's weird that you're the one who created this article. Just to know, because of a world tennis tournament that held in Japan. We don't have an episode today. — Shakhmoot Nadeshiko Village Symbol.svg (Talk) 13:09, May 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * Please stop creating the episode articles before they're even available on Crunchyroll to premium members first. I have taken note that it is always you doing this, you should really read Project:Spoiler policy, as it is pretty clear on this, even if you don't like it. --Sajuuk Talk Page 09:34, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Seal Barrier
Saw your question to Omni, and he put a reason for deletion because we have already an article of that jutsu. — Shakhmoot  (Talk) 09:49, July 4, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Seal Barrier
I thought it was clear by the deletion log. We already had an article on it, Sealing Barrier. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:01, July 4, 2014 (UTC)

Episode articles
You might want to read the spoiler policy on episodes: it is very clearly stated that the articles should NOT be created until after the release of the episode on Crunchyroll. Since the episode has not yet released, I will tag the article for deletion and it can be re-created at the appropriate time. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 09:02, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Just because "some" people aren't enforcing the policy, doesn't mean the policy does not exist, the policy does state not to make articles before the episode is released, which you did. And fyi, I didn't add this rule, it was added by TheUltimate3 in 2010, when I wasn't really a member of this wiki, so please don't accuse me of adding random rules, just because you got noticed adding spoilers before the release date. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 09:21, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Quite easy to prove that: the previous 3 episode articles were not created by you and were all made after the release of the episode on Crunchyroll. I am quick to notice that it's always yourself that makes these articles on the episodes before the actual release and when you weren't here for whatever reason, spoiler policy was adhered to. Again: just before "certain" people don't choose to enforce it, doesn't mean the policy does not exist. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 09:26, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Stop saying I made this rule, I did not. Read the god damn page history of the spoiler policy, you'll see very clearly that TheUltimate3 made the policy when he created the policy 4 years ago. It's not my problem "certain" people are choosing not to enforce it, but I will. Keep this discussion to TU3's talkpage, please, I have already proved that you are lying to sysops by claiming I made the policy and that it was made only a year ago. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 09:31, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * And yet again, I did not add that rule to the page, I simply updated the existing rule that was already there and was CREATED by TheUltimate3. Did you even bother to read the link I left you on TheUltimate3's talkpage? Obviously not, or you wouldn't be constantly making up bullcrap, because I know you are. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 09:37, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * And, if you actually noticed, that was a mistake on my part and was a simple duplication of a rule that's existed since the policy creation, it's not specific to anime episode. Stop trying to imply I made a rule, I made a duplication of an existing policy. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 09:51, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

As I do not have the time to sit on a chat room, I will be answering this here. There is nothing wrong with adding the episodes based on the actual Japanese release, considering 1) the episodes are released legally and 2) the fact that we blatantly ignore the actual release status of the manga in general. It is laughable that anyone would care about the Japanese release of the episodes when we piss on the manga release anyway. The fact that OmegaRasengan hasn't (and won't) be in any real trouble other than Spey's fits over it should have already been considered my silent consent to the whole thing. So yeah, more power to the episodes. Crunhyroll ain't payin our bills.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 16:02, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * There's an old forum thread where the the wiki decided that articles for new episodes and chapters need more than an infobox when they're created. I think that's the only thing you (OmegaRasengan) are guilty of here. Please write some summary when you make the articles. ~SnapperTo 17:33, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * Which he cannot obviously do if the episode's aren't even available to anyone until after TV Tokyo has released them. He probably just goes to Wikipedia and copies the kanji/romaji/episode name into the form and pastes it into the Episode form page and makes it. --Sajuuk Talk Page 17:39, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey thanks for your input on the amaterasu dual wield talk page. but you are wrong anyways. the rules state that i can add whatever i want and if it gets changed then it gets changed. im not saying my edit was correct and i apologize. i honestly thought it was the same jutsu. Munchvtec (talk) 12:51, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

I already apologized and admitted i was wrong okay so i don't know why your getting all worked up and rude about it. At first i thought that it was the same jutsu. try not to act like im a new user, i know the rules. Munchvtec (talk) 17:34, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

I did not skim through it. my thoughts are not above others at all. what do you mean it's not about the jutsu talk page, when have i done that before. your trying to start something and ill let it go this time but don't reply on my talk page. i don't want it getting filled with this crap. Munchvtec (talk) 17:46, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

I wanted to apologize for my behavior before. I was just in a bad mood. sorry. Munchvtec (talk) 11:41, September 30, 2014 (UTC)