Talk:Gamatama

Deletion
Un-named background character who isn't likely to ever come up. This information can be noted in either the episode article or on the article about the arc itself. --Speysider Talk Page 17:52, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * The character has appeared three separate times, why can't it have an article just because it has not been named? — S im A nt 18:15, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * It's appeared in the anime once. Two appearances on the front cover of a book aren't actual appearances in the series. ;) --Speysider Talk Page 18:16, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

This one should be kept, 3 appearances is enough proof that Kishi recognizes this one as a character, not just generic frog/toad or what ****--Elveonora (talk) 19:40, April 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * It didn't really appear "three times". The actual appearance "in the series" was in an anime episode. Unless we count book covers as being an appearance in the series now ? --Speysider Talk Page 19:41, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, we count that, it won't be there without a reason.79.223.88.181 (talk) 19:42, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * In all fairness, it could be argued that the appearance of this tadpole was just a cameo appearance that Kishi liked to use to indicate toads in the chapter, it could have absolutely no relevance whatsoever. --Speysider Talk Page 19:48, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

wait
How come do we have an English VA for this wretched creature, but not a Japanese Seiyuu?--Elveonora (talk) 16:02, April 1, 2014 (UTC)

Wretched creature, your pretty rude lol but I have no idea. Munchvtec (talk) 16:05, April 1, 2014 (UTC)