Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-36006024-20180926134241/@comment-26636534-20181027215832

BlazeRelease wrote:

@Ninja. I've never directly called you immature, just the way you're acting right now, is well immature. You accused me of going against the manga, when I accused you of it And no, people can call you as immature as much as you call them, your highness.

Actually, in my first post to you I called you out on denying easily reviewed manga feats. Only after that did you address me, so once again you are twisting statements and spewing falsities.

BlazeRelease wrote:

Wow, they knew he was Jinchuriki and that too his place. Man, I guess that all wraps it up, or wait.... Knowing he was a jinchurki, didn't help them in not knowing about his Genjutsu immunity, intense speed and power, and substitution trick.

And unless we're talking about a whole different series. The Sharingan is famous, B recognized it, when he was in a genjutsu in Sharingan.

Again, your "lack of intel" argument goes both ways and favors Bee. Since Bee had to figure out the abilities of four individuals, while taka had only to figure out 1. By the way, your sarcasm doesn't help your case.

BlazeRelease wrote:

Unless you're not able to read what I've been saying, I never stated anywhere that B can't use his Substitution jutsu, this is one of your immature acts, I been pointing out with. I simply said that he wouldn't be able to trick Taka the same way he did, if he does it himself. And the fact that he accurately knew what Sasuke would do.

I never said that lol, more falsities. I said that Bee can make substitutions by himself, because you stated..

BlazeRelease wrote:

I doubt he was able to think of a plan while burning from the Amaterasu, he so far was saved from Sasuke saving Karin and cancelling the Amaterasu.

Bloodlusted B comes out of the water for a straight attack again, as you mentioned, and gets shots with Amaterasu, and this time, he's not gonna survive it.

Which never happened. But you claim it did, then try and twist my rebuttal. You have lost a lot of credibility. Bee was not even blood lusted lol. How do I know this? Well, he tried to leave the fight. Therefore, his greatest motivation was not to fight with Taka. But to you that means nothing.

BlazeRelease wrote:

In your last post, '''you went on talking about how much you're right, and just stated that you agree with everything @Combat. Said. That's no counter, friend. Manga facts? You're given me none'''. If you take a slow clear look at th debate, it's about how(to the opinion you agreed upon) the manga was wrong, as in B himself stating Sasuke was the toughest guy he fought to be not right. Sigh, this is what happens when you barge in debates without having any idea on what it is about. Either you agree to the manga or not.

It so sad really. Your claims are the ones that are unproven, but you say stuff like this to me. And you think you are debating? jeez. I clearly said, I made a mistake in saying "@combat made most of the points I wanted to say", simply because it leaves the door open for you to twist statements. Which you have now done again. BlazeRelease wrote:

And yes, feats>assumptions, why don't you ever think about that?

Somethings can't be shorten, if you're asking for logical and detailed explainations. If you w If you want to prove your opinion, you have to do it the right way, and thus, you should start with the "holes" you're mentioning.ant to prove your opinion, you have to do it the right way, and thus, you should start with the "holes" you're mentioning. Or you can give up in this debate, no one is forcing you to this, even I'm surely gonna give up soon enough, maybe I'll give up with this post itself. Since unlike you both, I have to respond to more than just one just person.

It's strange how you don't take this advice, you ironically got from me, that you are now telling me. It is very hard to follow what you are actually trying to say. So I asked for you to shorten your wall posts, be clear and not exaggerate and go on tangents. I certainly don't see any point to be made by comparing Bee vs Taka to Madara vs Hashirama. But you did, and it only convoluted everything.

Don't cry to me that you have to respond to multiple people, if you were clear enough, brought proof of your points with a explanation that made sense, we would happily accept your interpretation. I should give up on a debate? lol. Yeah, says the one that took a week to respond. You haven't debated yet. BlazeRelease wrote:

Maybe it's my mistake there, maybe I'm right, but I can't start this debate all over again, especially with this not having any substainal use to it.

That's not what I'm asking. I'm asking you to state your main points clearly, shortly and without smoke and mirrors. Honestly, you have not been fun to converse with. I simply cannot take you seriously at this point. I even asked you to quote my points with a manga page that shows how I'm incorrect, as you were claiming, to try and eliminate these false accusations, but you saw no need to back up your claims.

So, do what you want then. But know that you could have debated with someone who had the same interest in a fight as you, but you chose in the worst possibly way not to.