Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-1512913-20161115123051/@comment-3279282-20161119173353

See, and that's why I always say you (and many, many others) don't know how to argue. You always come up with the "argument" >Because there is a chance that X is wrong - despite nothing indicating that - X is not right<. And that's simply no way of making an argument. Based on this, literally every piece of information in the databooks and in the manga is not true. Because there is always a chance that it could be retconned/corrected at a later date. You include a factor in your argument that isn't real, because it hasn't happened yet. It's like saying >I'm not 100% alive because it could be that I die tomorrow<. The premise in discussions like these is >If X was proven to be true, then it is true unless proven wrong. X is not true because it could be made wrong in the future.<. And when you want to discuss an already established fact, then it's your job to provide arguments for why it's wrong. You make the claim, after all. I made the claim that it's true, based on how kekkei genkai and advanced natures work. All you do is saying that it could be wrong because the databook as a whole contains errors.

And if you disregard everything related to an error, then what error is Magnet Release related to for you to disregard its combination?

Can't remember, I think on Explosion Release's talk page. But that's not the best explanation, because even back then, I was sick of it.