User talk:Snapper2

Question
when Orochimaru was fighting Hiruzen, he summoned a third casket written with yon on it. Would it likely have been Minato if the casket were to have successfully summoned? (also im sorry for writing that thing on the discussion page, and not to be offensive but you did kind of steal that dude's quote.) user:Filipinoboy97

Dude y did u take my stuff off of kakuzu it is true

Thank you
Hi. Thank you so much for answering me too.

Yes,ShounenSuki understood my question, I guess I wasn't very clear before, and unfortunely I was really using Sleepyfans scanlations, something I will never do again.

Based on what I "thought" he Fox said, and other errors, I was just trying to make the impossible sense of Naruto being the next Rikudo, because I HATE madara, hihi...

Thank you and ShounenSuki for helping me with that. Like I wrote him, after reading his answer, he is completely right. Kishimoto would do something much more obvious, or have left other clues on different ocasions, than a stupid play on wordslike I was desperate trying to believe.

Sorry to bother you guys =) --Christina Lavie Hamby (talk) 13:39, November 10, 2010 (UTC)

hi thanks 4 the welcome i love naruto

from daniellejacks you some info
Dear,Snapper2 i have some info for you, you should go to naruto shippuden and watch new naruto videos or episodes.

HEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hey snapper 2 i just realized my Naruto Episodes Online in Japaneses was deleted and it had your name there so i clicked on it did you delete it if you did why and i don't hold this against you but im very smart,i can probably find people and things i have my ways but please answer me and if you don't I'll keep re-posting it.Plus you should listen to my advice you might learn something. And if any-one has questions you can ask me I know my electronics.

sorry but i have bad eye sight so its hard to see all the small letters and its a legal website well time for bed gtg.thanks ill try not to do any thing stupid.

Amaterasu
Hey, are you reverting my edit because Amaterasu is above S-rank or something?ZPRN (talk) 16:17, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

Oh. That makes no sense, but okay.ZPRN (talk) 21:13, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

Ah, got it. But it is, clearly, S-Rank or above.ZPRN (talk) 03:32, November 12, 2010 (UTC)

poor quality images
Could you maybe delete, , , , , , , , because they are annoying me when i check through the poor quality images. --Ttogafer (talk) 18:03, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

Fuck you

hey men where fif u find the lost tower movie O_o

Talk:Dōjutsu
Why you delete my theory about the Dōjutsu's origination?--  Leodix     Talk   19:10, November 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * Why not?--  Leodix  Akatsuki_Symbol.svg   Talk   20:17, November 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your reasons, I did not know, I wanted to see if anyone was thinking something similar to what I thought. Personally, do you believe that my theory is correct?--  Leodix  Akatsuki_Symbol.svg   Talk   20:26, November 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * But the Uchiha ancestor had a dōjutsu, at no time receive an ancestor Hyuga in history that relates to the Sharingan with the Byakugan, maybe the Byakugan had a parallel evolution. I forgot to add the eyes of the "Tailed Beasts" which also derive from the Eye of the Beast of Ten Tails.--  Leodix  Akatsuki_Symbol.svg   Talk   20:44, November 13, 2010 (UTC)

Double redirects
There are two double redirects left, but they're sysop-protected. Can you finish those? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:57, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't mean deleting, just making it so they point to the right page. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:04, November 14, 2010 (UTC)

you wanted me to leave a message on your talk page.

Hey
Stop Taking off the One-Tails Menacing Ball Pic unless youre going to replace it with a new one. Youre frikin annoying me.

Guys you banned yesterday are back
121.72.200.95 Under a new IP.--NaruHina fan (talk) 04:03, November 28, 2010 (UTC)

Fine
Ill change it to PNG

Hey
Everything else is correct

hey
so whats up and thanks i am happy someone liked my edit on the rain jusu thing but not much ppl like anything i do so thanks for you makin my day i have nothing better to do than to get on coolmath and play games or gget on here so i thought i could message you or something

im not wrong
duude the ten tailed beast (juubi) was the first sharingan user. . . dont believe? go check the manga

There is no evidence that suggests that the Ten-Tails was the first sharingan user. The sharingan (along with the Byakugan) was believed to have been derived from the Sage of the Six Paths's elder son, not the Ten-Tails. Fmakck - Talk - Contributions

Databook
Hi Snapper2! As a user you showed me where to find the Third Databook I wanted to ask if you know where to find the first and second databooks. --  Leodix  |   My Talk  |   Contributions  01:16, December 8, 2010 (UTC)

Reverted Contributions... -.-
Greetings, i´ve noticed that my contributions to some pages weren´t taken and I would like to know why cause the contributions I made weren´t false but not more than a minor credit to the topic. Tell me what is the problem to fix it and if for any chance my contributions could be accepted, Thanks.

New View... Would you accept???
I agree with you, but I contributed with that kind of Info(Credit) cause i think its better to give an emphasis to what the topic is, for example Hashirama Senju, he was a great shinobi, one of the best if not the best, so i thought that by puting more credit to the article or in other words focusing on what the article is, in this case the First Hokage, the article would give a more clear and comprehensable view of what the article is talking about, it would look better also. What do you say? Are my contributions good enough as i say? it would make the article better by highlighting the main ideas as I did...

Understood, I totally agree with that, just that the trivia was one part of the things i edit and well I agree that the trivia is for something else, but I also edited some parts in the main body like the Ability section, I just gave more credit and additional presumed info to that but you might check that next time I edit and tell me what do you think ok. Well nice to know more of this Wiki and glad to contribute in what I can! We´ll be in contact!

Summary or Synopsis
I see that starting from chapter 510, we began using "summary" instead of "synopsis". I asked Jacce, and he told me that it has to do with keeping chapter descriptions short, and that I should ask you for more info. Does that mean we have to change all chapters prior to 510 so they show summary? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:24, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Turns out I worried for nothing, there were just a few chapters with synopsis sandwiched between chapters with summary. I already changed it. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:15, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

Hello About The Sasuke Ruse Thing...
The reason I put in the Kabuto wiki page that wanting Sasuke was all part of a ruse was because he said he wanted to learn the secrets of the Sage of Six Paths. Now think about it, even with the Eternal Mangekyo Sharingan, he wouldn't be able to learn everything and Kabuto would surely want a more powerful set of eyes. When i first heard this, I thought that he either wanted Madara for the Rinnegan or maybe even the Sage's dead body. I don't know, its was just a theory I put down and I thought I would share it with the page. BlackGhost91 (talk) 23:34, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

My Page
Hi. People keep bothering me on my page. Can you do something about it please? --TheDarkUchiha189 (talk) 01:20, December 18, 2010 (UTC)TheDarkUchiha189

Sasuke_408 file
Why did you delete the Sasuke image I uploaded?

Re: Swords
Ok I understand what you are saying, but your argument still invalid. The examples you listed all use ninja tools specifically. Shuriken and kunai are weapons used by shinobi exclusively in the series, but not swords. So in real life i'm sure not only ninja used swords. You have heard of samurai and knights. They both used swords in combat and they were not ninja so it's kind of unfair to say that all tool based techniques are ninjutsu. I think it is more logical to say the sword techniques are kenjutsu only. Samurai in the series have been shown to use chakra, but they do not use ninja tools. So if they performed the same techniques the cloud ninja used it wouldn't be ninjutsu. Also your assumption is incorrect. I saw that edit summary response ShounenSuki typed. That is why I brought it up on his talk page as well. 00:52, December 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * You basically summarized my entire response -_-. So since only cloud shinobi use those techniques they are also classified as ninjutsu, but if the samurai in the series also performed those same techniques would they still be classified as ninjutsu or only kenjutsu? I'm curious as to what your answer is. Again I'm not trying to argue.  18:54, December 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * OK I guess I see your point more clearly now. Only ninja have used those techniques so far in the series they are classified as ninjutsu also. So in the event that Samurai use the same jutsu they will no longer be classified as ninjutsu. Thanks for being patient and responsive with me. I guess your technical definitions make sense. 03:19, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

Land mine Punch
There are two land mine punch articles on the wiki. Here is the other one that was made already. 10:22, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

Sasori's page
Hey, can you fix Sasori's infobox? Some idiot put "Cousin" and "Sasori" in it. Someone told me yesterday night, and i went to fix it, problem is that I don't know how to edit infoboxes-- Ninja Sheik  21:38, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

I made this and I like to put it in the wikia

http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/4599/7swordsmenbykyubisharin.jpg

it makes it more epic and good and it's show them how the charachters are

Oke

Yea. I saw the Sasori cousin thing too. and i tried to change it but that ended with a Giant Fail. the page is locked soooo thats not my area of expertice. EditorNumbers December 28, 2010

zabuza's team
should we make a page for thhe "team" that has zabuza, haku, pakura, and gari. they do work like a team i to an extent.Scott sswag (talk) 08:18, December 28, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! :D
Haha! Thanks! :D -Dodong Ray- 00:58, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

Protected image
It seems someone uploaded an image that is somehow protected, most likely a protected image which was deleted in the past. Because it's protected, I can't tag it for deletion. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:42, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

=hi== Well i really have encountered where i cant get to certain pages and stuff but i never really looked into it so tell Jacce that i dont believe that i really can help with this problem i am not the smartest person and its no bother to message me i like getting on to a new message it makes me interested in this site i really like this site so it has a little bit of flaws everything has flaws so if i can deal wif them your should be able to as well and do you have a facebook i get on there more than here my name is Ravin Tripp message me if u have any more questions okay? i get on facebook everyday i dont with this site i get on it at school but not at home so message me on facebook. Ravin Tripp <3 Matt Sleemer

Izanagi
I have a question about Izanagi. How come it is no longer listed as a Rinnegan jutsu and that the Sage of the Six Paths didn't use it? I edited the Rinnegan page and removed Izanagi from its list, but I am still confused and would like an answer. I hope you reply soon. 08:17, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

International Naruto
why did you delete my article?

Image
I'm not really sure where the wiki stands on this so i decided to ask one of you guys because of recent events. For example the image of Shikaku Nara. If someone actually edited the picture to remove the dirt marks from his face is that in breach of the image policy? --Cerez365 (talk) 19:24, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Oh i see. It was actually because i uploaded an image for Inoichi's infobox but he was also dirt faced but then another contributor did the same but the image was clean so i updated mine before i had realized what they had actually done. But for the whole Shikaku thing there really isn't a better image for him that i've seen in the anime at least. The drawing has really deteriorated and they barely bother with clean definitions unless it's a close up of the person. So we might have to wait a while. --Cerez365 (talk) 19:46, January 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * I personally think it would look better, but the policy says "...and other images that have been edited (other than for simple resizing or cropping), will all be deleted unconditionally." but I might be interpreting it wrong. ~ Fmakck - Talk - Contributions 19:43, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Bug
Hey there. Apparently a bug seems to be stuck on the wiki's website and it has been screwing up with many articles. Do you or the other admins have any idea what is going on or if it is being resolved? I'm only asking in case you have not noticed already. Please respond soon. 07:41, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Re: New Sexy Technique
I understood the bikini form as the new form, the sumo part being Naruto not getting what Jiraiya wanted. Past images added to that article (which were deleted most likely due to lack of license or rationale) always showed the female Naruto in bikini. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:46, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bikini isn't new? I don't remember Naruto ever using a bikini when he used the Sexy Technique. Or was it Konohamaru that used the bikini with the regular Sexy Technique? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:21, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * If I remember correctly, Naruto always used a smoke cloud (in the anime) to hide his technique, so he never wore a bikini. And Konohamaru, he didn't use it that much, and when he did I didn't pay attention, so I'm not sure a bout him. ~ Fmakck - Talk - Contributions 21:36, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

The Site
Do you know what's up with the site this time? A lot of characters' infoboxes are messed up and someone seems to have vandalized Naruto's information. If you do not have an answer that's ok, but I just wanted to see if anyone noticed or could tell me what's up. Hope to hear from you soon.

15:37, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Kekkei Tota
I think you should add the Kekkei Tota to the infoboxes. This is so natures like Dust Release are not inaccurately listed as Kekkei Genkai. 20:07, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Sasuke and Itachi's Infoboxes
Hey I was just wondering could you edit Sasuke and Itachi's family section of their infoboxes so that it shows which is older and younger like all the other pairs of siblings on the site? It would make things more consistent. I would do it myself, but those sections of the infoboxes are locked. Thanks in advance.

05:04, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Deletion tag
I only put a deletion tag in the infobox. I figured that since the infobox was still in the article, the deletion category would be carried over. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 23:08, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Family Infoboxes
Hey there. I have a question to ask: How come all the character infoboxes have the family section locked? I have been trying to see if I could bypass this for awhile, but I had no avail. Some of the edits I have meant to make in the past include the infobox so do you know if you or any of the admins could please unfreeze it so that other users like myself can edit them? 05:07, February 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * RE: I understand what you are saying, but I think you misunderstood my message a little. I was saying that I CAN'T edit anyone's infobox

having to do with family. Did you mean to edit it manually like by html code? (Editing the page instead of the form). I guess I could try that, but I'm still unsure it would work. Also i don't know how to fix my signature. I guess I thought the one I made on the Dragon Ball wiki would work here also. -Banan14kab