Talk:Object Extraction Technique

Limited
Is this technique really on limited to explosion tags? I vote we change the name and keep the last part of the page, that says that it extracts object that are otherwise hidden. KotoSenju (OldUser:JaZZBaND)-Talk-Contributions 02:48, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd have no issue with this.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 03:05, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. KotoSenju (OldUser:JaZZBaND)-Talk-Contributions 03:08, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Wow. You didn't even give it one hour so other people could weigh in on this. Most times, those moves take at least a day. The technique specified exploding tags because that's the only thing we saw it being used with. Even if you think a page should be moved, you don't simply move it after one person agrees with you. Has it occurred to you that other people may not agree, or that in the event they do agree, they can have a better idea on what to name the technique? This is not a case where people simply move articles because actual names and proper translations were obtained, this is an unnamed technique, and what we call it depends on everyone who wants to voice their opinion on it, not just yours. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:33, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry. I meant no harm. I mean, I thought the situation was minor. What is your opinion on the matter? KotoSenju (OldUser:JaZZBaND)-Talk-Contributions 23:36, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

I don't see why should it work just on explosive tags, the changed name makes more sense. But yes, a single editor doesn't make up this wiki, we all are here for the same purpose, well, at least most of us ;D--Elveonora (talk) 11:39, June 19, 2013 (UTC)