Talk:Asura Ōtsutsuki

Logical deduction using facts
There have been arguments about Asura having Six Paths Senjutsu. To me the answer is obvious, yes, he did. From what we know, Asura's chakra+Indra's chakra=Hagoromo's chakra. Simply put, merging chakras of Hagoromo's sons recreates Hagoromo's chakra. Hagoromo is known to have had Six Paths Sage Chakra. Asura's avatar has Truth Seeking Balls too so.--Elve Talk Page 10:19, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * But [Asura's chakra =/= Hagoromo's chakra] and [Truth-Seeking Balls unconfirmed]. • Seelentau 愛 議 10:40, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Point being there's no indication Indra inherited Six Path Sage Chakra, while Truth Seeking Balls are highly likely with Asura along with the Tailed Beast like Avatar.--Elve Talk Page 10:46, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Neither Indora nor Ashura were said to have inherited SPSC and the black orbs weren't confirmed to be TSBs. • Seelentau 愛 議 10:47, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * If merging their chakras restores Hagoromo's then one of them has to have SPSC and the black orbs i'm aware weren't "confirmed" to be TSB but it's obvious. I mean, Naruto against Sasuke was almost identical to Asura vs Indra, yet you say their avatars and orbs which look almost identical are unrelated? Lawl.--Elve Talk Page 10:58, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * But his chakra is SPSC, if the two each had 50%, why does one have the full 100%? Also, it doesn't matter what I'm saying. Or you. Or anyone. They weren't confirmed to be TSB, so we won't call them that. I can only repeat: It's not our job to correct the manga, neither is it our job to fill in the unexplained gaps. • Seelentau 愛 議 11:05, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * The fact that he has a Chakra Cloak in the chapter where Hagoromo says Naruto is his Reincarnation kind of raises all of your points into question, guys. It'd make more sense if we tried debating whether or not that was a SPSC empowered Form. I mean, it kind of immediately proves that it is, indeed, a Chakra Mode. Think of it this way; Naruto is his Reincarnation. He has Hagoromo's Sage Chakra which everyone else seems to forget. And, most importantly, the fact that his Chakra forms a Cloak implies that he has some sort of connection to the Form in itself. The fact that he has a Cloak means that he has to have one of two abilities 1. The Tensaigan, or 2. Chakra from Kurama. But think of it this way. What does the face of his Battle Avatar resemble the most? It doesn't resemble a fox, does it? It looks like a rabbit's face, instead. Not to mention, if I'm reading the manga correctly, Hagoromo gives Asura his Chakra before he splits the Tailed Beasts up. That means he would have to have some sort of trace of the Beasts in there, right? If you want proof, just look at Boruto and Himawari. They both have the Whisker Marks that Naruto has. Going back to Asura, wouldn't that mean he had the Chakra that he needed to use the SPSC, which, in turn, would allow him the use of the TSB? Since the Chakra would have immediately melded with his own Chakra Network upon receiving, and it would obviously not have the Jyuubi's consciousness inside of it, it is safe to assume that he would gain the ability to utilize a Chakra Shroud, which he does. Therefore, if this is any indication, which it most certainly is, that would mean that his Avatar was a bi-product of receiving Hagoromo's Chakra. In essence, the proof is already supplied. -- User:ExyleCage ExyleCage (talk) 20:39, July 10, 2015 (UTC)

Naruto has/had SPSC, so he has/had 100% of Hagoromo's chakra? Nope. And it's not correcting manga, it's stating the obvious. I'm sure Kishimoto trusts his fans can connect the dots. Naruto is reincarnation of Asura and their avatars and orbs are very similar so it's given they are related.--Elve Talk Page 11:11, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * So Hagoromo's chakra is 100% SPSC, but if you have only 50% of his chakra, you still have SPSC? Then what did Indora get? Logically, he would've gotten SPSC as well. And yes, there are similaritys. They don't mean anything as long as Kishimoto doesn't explain them, though. • Seelentau 愛 議 11:17, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * The problem is, Indra's chakra avatar wasn't stated to be Susanoo either. Yet it's "obvious" and we "correct the manga" and "fill in the gaps" in regards to that, but the same doesn't apply about Asura's chakra avatar because double standards.--Elve Talk Page 11:19, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Lol no. It's because Indora's chakra avater obviously is Susanoo. You don't need to correct or fill in anything there. Ashura's avatar doesn't look like anything we've seen to date, so we can't name it just because Naruto's fox avatar somewhat looks like Indora's avatar. • Seelentau 愛 議 11:35, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Just like it's "obvious" to you that Indra's chakra avatar was Susanoo since it looks like other Susanoo, it's "obvious" to me that Asura's chakra avatar was Kurama and his black orbs were TSB. Your "obvious" isn't superior to mine. It hasn't been stated anywhere in manga or databooks (to my knowledge) that Indra used Susanoo, so hence by your own logic it should be removed.--Elve Talk Page 11:39, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * There is no difference between Indora's Susanoo and the others. There IS a difference between Ashura's chakra mode and Naruto's Kurama mode. Additionally, Ashura was never said to be Kurama's Jinchuriki, in fact, Mito was even called its first Jinchuriki. There is no problem in calling Indora's avater Susanoo because it adds up. Ashura having Kurama's chakra does not. Additionally, the black orbs could've been TBB and not TSB. Both are black orbs, so we can't say for sure that they're TSB. • Seelentau 愛 議 11:44, June 21, 2015 (UTC)

That's not the point, your logic was we shouldn't correct and fill in the gaps. Indra's chakra avatar is NO MORE obviously Susanoo than is Shin's Space-Time Tech Kamui, yet we haven't added the latter. The only difference between Ashura and Naruto's is the heads and neck thingy. Also TBB require Tailed Beast chakra, TSB require Six Paths Sage Chakra and FF-Suzaku I believe said it's suggested in the novel Tailed Beast chakra plays role in Six Paths Senjutsu after all (and you say it's fanon I know). One way or another, Ashura was either jinchuuriki or Six Paths Senjutsu user or both.--Elve Talk Page 11:54, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * My point is that Indora's Susanoo isn't something that was filled in by us, while Ashura's avatar obviously would be. This discussions alone are proof enough that we can't simply add it as you want. • Seelentau 愛 議 11:57, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Except it was filled in by us. It wasn't stated to be Susanoo in any official source, heck, Indra wasn't stated to have had a Mangekyou Sharingan either, it was "filled in" by us that his spiral eye thingy was it.--Elve Talk Page 12:06, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Elve, maybe that's because it didn't have to be stated by an official source. I think anyone can read the corresponding manga chapter and determine that it was indeed Susanoo. The disconnect here is that you think Asura is obviously using something that isn't obvious to others.--Mina [[Image:Hatake Symbol.svg|20px]] talk 12:12, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Because there is no other possibility. Same goes for Magnet Release's natures. • Seelentau 愛 議 12:13, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, precisely. We knew his natures via databook, so there was only one obvious choice left. Elve, you yourself stated that Asura was either "jinchuriki" or "SPS", or "both": one out of three possibilities. You're comfortable guessing on which it is?--Mina [[Image:Hatake Symbol.svg|20px]] talk 12:17, June 21, 2015 (UTC)

Hypocrisy is our greatest sin isn't it... Indra's obviously Susanoo because it has most of the characteristics other Susanoo have, Tengu theme and all, still doesn't change the fact it wasn't stated we just assume, thus you shat in your own mouth Seel about "not our job to assume" For the rest, only differences between Ashura and Naruti's avatars is the head and necklace/beads otherwise they are more similar to each other than Indra's Susanoo to Sasuke's, yet they aren't the same thing because double standards. @Minamoto, the novel suggests Tailed Beast chakra is required for Six Paths Senjutsu, if that's true, then it's both.--Elve Talk Page 12:22, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd like to ask which novel suggests that because I don't recall that at all.--Omojuze (talk) 13:16, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * I believe it was the Shikamaru novel. Shikamaru notes that he has all tailed beasts chakra and Six Paths chakra that basically made him a god.--TheUltimate3 Akimichi Symbol.svg (talk) 13:20, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * ^mhh... Thank you. But that doesn't imply anything in regards to requirements of Tailed Beast Chakra to use Rikudō Senjutsu. The sentence doesn't imply anything at all, unless you count "confirmation" that Naruto has kept the Bijū chakra.--Omojuze (talk) 13:23, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * There were also remnants of the other 8 bijuu inside him as well. In that way, you could say he was a human pillar for the power of the Ten Tails. In the last war, Obito had become a human pillar for the Ten Tails and gained chakra rivalling that of the Sage of the Six Paths. Naruto, who’d taken the bijuu into him as well, had some of the Sage’s power even now. - this? (Shikamaru Hiden, Chapter 1/4, between pages 75-85)--Omojuze (talk) 13:27, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * That's correct.--Elve Talk Page 13:51, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * I have not idea if I'm doing this right because I haven't done this in awhile. But, anyway, on to the conversation. Wouldn't it at least be alright to say he possibly had SPSC? I mean, Asura USES something close. Though, we could also argue that he does have it I mean, Hagoromo does say that he entrusted Asura with his power. Arguably, that could mean that he was referring to the SPSC. Though, I'm not saying it does mean he has it. It just means he could. Why not at least add it with a side note suggesting that it's a possibility? We've done it before. I'll use Sasuke as an example. In no way have we seen him use an ability from each of the SP. We've only seen him do something with a few of them. Yet we listed them as abilities nonetheless. Why not do it for Asura, too? Now, I'm gonna attempt to sign this, but I don't know if I remember how.-- User:ExyleCage ExyleCage (talk) 16:58, July 10, 2015 (UTC)

Last Name
Y'know, ever since Ōtsutsuki was added to his and his brother's pages something's been nagging me, but I left it alone. Y'all cite the fourth databook as having given this information. Their names in the databook are literally just given in first name only. I know we were expecting them to be revealed with the full Ōtsutsuki name, but it didn't happen and yet we went ahead and added it as soon as we could. I mean, am I missing something here? Is it actually mentioned somewhere in one or both of the databook articles and Kishi for some reason didn't add it to the title?--ScruffyC (talk) 13:47, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * I think the last names were given in some promotional material in the WSJ or so... • Seelentau 愛 議 13:49, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * I think the reason that they were given "Otsutsuki" is because of the fact that Hagoromo revealed that he had two sons called Asura and Indra and his name was given as "Otsutsuki", so it was logical that their names were the same as well. But honestly, a lot of shit done on this wiki makes little sense anymore and reasoning just becomes wilder and wilder. >_> --Sajuuk Special:Contributions/SuperSajuuk 14:01, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * I understand the logic behind it, and once upon a time I was on the side of adding their names with that reasoning in mind... However, seeing as Kishimoto went to the trouble of not adding the brothers' names as "Ōtsutsuki" in the databook, something I'm positive he thought about (he did confirm Hamura's name as such), I'm hesitant to seal the deal, y'know? But if there's promo material confirming it, I'm happy. ScruffyC (talk) 14:07, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Talk:Indra_Ōtsutsuki and http://i.imgur.com/cj9LQHi.jpg 14:27, June 21, 2015 (UTC)

~/Battle Avatar/~
Again, I have no idea if I'm doing this right, but at least I'm trying, right? Anyway, on to the discussion. Now, I know we've all been thinking this. The Battle Avatar. Why isn't it listed as a technique? We all know it's a technique, so why not add it as a technique in his Jutsu Category? It's kind of common sense, if you ask me. But I'll leave it up to you guys since all I ever do is fix grammar. So, anyway, if it is a technique, can we add it? Again, no idea if I'm signing this right, but I'll give it a try.-- User:ExyleCage ExyleCage (talk) 17:06, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * We have no name and no information on what it is capable to do. Neither do we know how he achieved it. So there's no information a separate article on the avatar would have, that Asura's article not has. • Seelentau 愛 議 19:25, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * That isn't what I meant. We could put it in his Jutsu category as 'Battle Avatar' or something like that. -- User:ExyleCage ExyleCage (talk) 19:59, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * That's not how it works. The character box's technique are autmatically included. • Seelentau 愛 議 20:02, July 10, 2015 (UTC)