Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-25319479-20160826145712/@comment-1251315-20160830175157

Omnibender wrote: Having just looked at that episode article, yes, that needs to be trimmed down significantly. I agree entirely. But let's not trim things down to the point where the Wikipedia tag is needed, or all important details are removed. The main problem I have with trimming is that it is not consistent and we have numerous episode articles that were already lengthy and overly detailed and yet nobody has ever bothered with trimming them at all.

However, I agree that trimming is needed. But I still think it's a good idea that someone like Murali9395 should continue their edits and others can use the content that has been provided by him/her to summarise the episode to what the wiki expects. The issue also is that the more recent episodes are extremely short (in terms of "they don't cover as much content") and the much older episodes tended to cover a lot more. So we also have that inconsistency as well.