Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-24168857-20150708081120/@comment-5936871-20150709214352

@UchihaMasters That wasn't a rock, it was clearly a moving tree branch. Also, what are you talking about? Naruto didn't need those clones nor TBSM to stop the clones. He wasn't even trying to harm them, they were all kids, we all know Naruto could have one-shotted them all with a Rasenshuriken if he wanted.

It also clearly isn't basic logic nor common sense if people continue to argue about it, and Sasuke has plenty of fanboys too. The Uchiha do in general. My previous post should have proved why Naruto is stronger anyway.

Also that is speculation, we don't know if Sasuke's Susanoo is on par with Naruto's TBM at this point. Naruto only had half of Kurama, and was running low on chakra from the other beasts when he fought Sasuke at the time. Sasuke's Susanoo isn't fodder compared to Naruto's TBM, but to believe that Sasuke's Susanoo is equal to the full power of Kurama plus the chakra of the other beasts (Not when low) is ridiculous.

Also your "making sense" argument doesn't really work. The Zetsu and Kaguya retcon does make sense with the series, it isn't even a real retcon, Kishimoto was probably planning it for a while. Sasuke's Susanoo being stronger than Madara's doesn't mean it's on par with Naruto's TBM either. Madara's Susanoo was stated to be as strong as the Tailed Beasts, he never specified, so he most likely meant the beasts in general, all the other weaker ones who are fodder compared to Kurama.

Sasuke also wasn't even more weakened than Naruto in their final fight. Where did you get that from? Where? The only disadvantage Sasuke had was his Rinnegan not being fully developed, and that isn't that big of deal since he was already capable of using it's strongest abilities on a large scale without a problem.