Narutopedia:Sysop Requests

This page is for users to request the action or attention of one of the Narutopedia's several sysops. If you require a sysop's assistance, please leave a request under one of the following headings and a sysop will get to it as soon as they are able. You may also contact one of the Narutopedia's sysops directly; a list of the wiki's sysops can be viewed here.

Note to sysops: If you have dealt with or intend to deal with an issue, please add to it. Please also archive this page from time to time to ensure the page is kept clean of completed requests.

READ FIRST!
Please check here to see what section your request fits into:
 * Do you feel one of the wiki's pages needs to be protected from editing? Would you like to request that a protected page be unprotected? Is a sysop needed to modify a protected page? If so, please click here to make a protection request
 * Is there a page on the wiki that you believe needs to be deleted? Has something been deleted that you would like to have restored? If so, please click here to make a deletion request
 * Has a user vandalized the wiki? Does somebody continue to make certain kinds of edits after repeated warnings? Would you like a block to be adjusted or removed? If so, please click here to make a block request
 * Is there an issue in the forums that needs a sysop's attention? Is there a forum-related action you would like a sysop to perform? If so, please click here to make a forum request
 * Any other request that doesn't fit one of the above? Please click here to make a miscellaneous request

Protection-related requests

 * Sasuke Uchiha - Protection from moving the page due to vandalism. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 13:54, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. ~SnapperTo 17:53, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sage Art: Super Tailed Beast Rasenshuriken - Counter productive edit warring. Also, pointless edits being made to a comment tag for no reason other than to pad edit count. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 20:30, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Side note: the edit wasn't "padding". ~SnapperTo 20:42, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Naruto Uzumaki's Relationships - Protection from editors who whimsically alter words in the article. Too many pointless edits. WindStar7125  WindStar7125 Task.svg (Talk) (Contributions) 05:13, August 22, 2014 (UTC)

Deletion-related requests

 * User:SuperSajuuk/Custom UB, User:SuperSajuuk/Custom UB/Image Uploader and this: Author request. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 15:16, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅--~Ultimate Supreme  17:54, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Wind Release: Great Absorption & Parrot -- Talkpage discussion. Norleon (talk) 17:13, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * These four screen- -shots once this discussion is closed please. Norleon (talk) 12:17, August 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * Koppojutsu - Fanon. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 17:24, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * Snapper's userpage - No offence intended Snapper, but if we tell others off for not following Userpage policy, then it's only right that your userpage be deleted as it has nothing to do with the wiki and doesn't talk about you as an editor. I would use the delete template, but Snapper has had his userpage protected for years. He can save it from deletion by actually making it useful (aka, talking about himself as an editor, like every other editor is required to do to have a userpage) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:30, August 21, 2014 (UTC)

Blocking-related requests

 * They have been adding false information on the Naruto Shippūden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Revolution page without sources almost everyday for at least the past month. Examples include adding unconfirmed playable characters, teams, stages, and ultimate jutsu. They have also started adding speculation to the new Naruto Shin Jidai Kaimaku Project page as well. --Questionaredude (talk) 18:10, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. ~SnapperTo 18:37, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Movepage vandalism. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 13:54, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * User only did it once. It's vandalism, I guess, but not worth blocking over if they don't continue. ~SnapperTo 16:52, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Ignoring talkpage warnings to stop violating Image policy (3 warnings given and still violating policy) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 09:26, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. ~SnapperTo 16:52, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Vandalism to Taijutsu. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 17:24, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Spamming "I need to pee" in various threads on the forums. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 20:07, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Vandalism --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 22:08, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:23, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * - violating the Image Policy even after being blocked because of it.--Mangekyō Sharingan Izuna.svg JOA20 09:41, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * The user "Infinite.tsukuyomi" is probably another one of the 5 accounts blocked indefinitely previously for being obsessed with Karin. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 09:43, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:58, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:58, August 22, 2014 (UTC)

Forum-related requests

 * Please close these threads. Sorry if ever there's a double link. Thank you!:
 * Thread:120116
 * Thread:120403
 * Thread:120792
 * Thread:121672
 * Thread:121912
 * Thread:121907
 * Thread:121634
 * Thread:122204-Not sure if this will be closed.
 * Thread:122584
 * Thread:121847
 * Thread:122332
 * Thread:122497
 * Thread:122579
 * Thread:122960
 * Thread:123202
 * Thread:122876
 * Thread:122465
 * Thread:122369
 * Thread:122748
 * Thread:123275
 * Thread:122849
 * Thread:123540-ItachiWasAHero somehow answered it.
 * Thread:123976
 * Thread:123885
 * Thread:122825
 * Thread:124021
 * Thread:124203
 * Thread:124302
 * Thread:124886
 * ~IndxcvNovelist (talk 11:36, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't agree with this at all and do not recommend it be carried out. Closing threads just because they've been answered or haven't been responded to in a while is an extremely bad move and will give the impression that nobody can have a discussion as someone will just come along and close their thread. The threads being open and inactive is better than closing them all. --Speysider Talk Page 11:38, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not even going to hide how stupid I find that reasoning Speysider, but I won't close them then.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 11:43, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * It may just be your opinion, Spey. I'm pretty sure others would not mind creating new threads. I thought you're encouraging others to have few threads with similar topic rather than to have a thread with over a hundred replies? ~IndxcvNovelist (talk 11:48, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * Should probably amend. I won't close them, for now.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 12:05, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * It does seem pointless to go closing threads over the wiki when they have already died.
 * Closing should only be done when its just an announcement and requires no discussion or if the discussion seems to be going too off-topic or the like...~Ultimate Supreme  12:25, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^ This. --Speysider Talk Page 12:30, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * I think this script will work for us--~Ultimate Supreme  11:49, June 6, 2014 (UTC)


 * Thread:126207 - Leading nowhere and the OP is simply resorting to making pointless, off topic posts that consist of personal attacks against random users. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 23:20, August 7, 2014 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

 * Okay, so I guess I would try this. Can someone update this page, specifically the Contact the Community? section? (May be optional though since this page is unused.) Thanks. :) ~IndxcvNovelist (talk 17:06, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * I reduced the protection. If you have some idea about what to update the page with (as I have no idea), you should be able to do it yourself. ~SnapperTo 17:59, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you :). ~IndxcvNovelist (talk 11:52, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * This is specifically up to the sysops, but I'm requesting that Kind-Hearted-One and Aged Goblin have their rollback flags removed, as they don't seem to be active (their last edits were on 28th May and 30th June respectively) and don't appear to be reverting vandalism regularly enough to require the flag. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 17:17, August 20, 2014 (UTC)