User talk:Omnibender

Re: Block
Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:10, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Boundary Barrier
I've tried translating those kanji before, but for some reason I cannot find them anywhere. The odd thing is, they don't look like they are simply gibberish... —ShounenSuki (talk 07:58, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Episode summaries
As you wish. --Ttogafer (talk) 16:52, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Siblings
Ok just trying to help out where I could

New chakra nature concepts
It seems that I was wrong and Kishi did decide to introduce three-elements combinations. I'm looking forward to your ideas on that, as this new introduction of Kekkei Tōta created more problems for all of us with theories. Also, Sand Release is also viable as a theory now, if Kishi decides to retcon that and elaborate on how it works. For some reason, it seems that Kishi is treating kekkei genkai as the same meaning as "advanced natures" these days, since we haven't seen anything like Shikotsumyaku for a long time. --GoDai (talk) 06:49, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Kekkei Tōta
Great minds do think alike ^^ That was one of the first thing that came to my mind when I first read of the kekkei tōta. It could explain a whole lot in this way, from the different Yōton users to the Fifth Mizukage's double elemental kekkei genkai. It also strongly hints at a kind of eugenics or genetic manipulation programme dating back to perhaps even before the villages were founded. —ShounenSuki (talk 01:16, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Let's just hope Kishimoto-sensei actually meant for this to explain all that... —ShounenSuki (talk 01:41, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Bird monster
My bad, I searched for it for a little to see if it existed already, but I couldn't find anything due to it not really having a name. By the way, do you think it should be called San's Hawk or Exploding-feathered Bird? ~ Fmakck - Talk - Contributions 04:09, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Never mind, San's Hawk sounds better. ~ Fmakck - Talk - Contributions 04:12, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Message 1/28/2011
There are some things I would like to add to some articles without getting into a "revert war".

1) Danzo does not refer to Sasuke's skill with Tsukuyomi, but rather, denounces the genjutsu he used in comparision with Tsukuyomi's capability.

2) The databook (3) frequently referred to the Mangekyo Sharingan (Susanoo, Kamui, and Uchiha clan translations) as the supreme dojutsu; I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be there even if it's contradictory.

3)According to the spoilers, "Enton" is merely the nature of Amaterasu, not the ability to shape them. The current article is misleading when in reality, Amaterasu is actually an Enton by itself. Randy Michael (talk) 04:18, January 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * it's unlikely Danzō would compare a simple genjutsu to Tsukuyomi.

That's exactly what he's doing: comparing an inferior genjutsu to a genjutsu known for manipulating the perception of time. A primary reason as to why he didn't use it lies in the idea of "transferred trauma" ergo when Tsukuyomi is broken or stopped the pain experienced in the illusion will briefy affect the target. Didn't quite happen aside from the cloud shinobi and bee.

As for Amaterasu, that basically seems to be outdated info [Retcon] or misconstrued info; you could look at "group" without the lireral sense. Databook II didn't refer to it as a fire release iirc. Sasuke referred to the Amaterasu he used on Gaara as Enton, which basically lends credence to the idea that merely shaping the flames doesn't denote the naming of a whole new release or that he's performing a nature transformation. http://www.narutoforums.com/showthread.php?p=25578733#post25578733

Randy Michael (talk) 03:11, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Deletion tags
Unless it's offensive to the eyes or some other sensibility, please do not blank articles when tagging them for deletion. It wastes five seconds of my day while I look up an old version of the page. ~SnapperTo 22:54, January 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * Someone does it more often than that. Deva maybe? For future reference anyway. ~SnapperTo 23:12, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Gama-Chan
Hi there. Your edit of my information to Gama-chan was perhaps coded properly, albeit backwards. The writing in both the anime as well as the manga appears in the native hirigana where it is written as: なるとさいふ. To state "The strip roughly says Naruto's Wallet (なるとさいふ, Naruto Saifu)" would be backwards and therefore incorrect. If you'd like to suggest a reason why I'm incorrect in my way of putting it, please let me know. &#160;    - Daniel Peragine (talk) 10:49, January 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * This is wrong because what is WRITTEN on Gama-chan is the following: "なるとさいふ" which is pronounced as "Naruto Saifu", and means Naruto's Wallet. In your edit, you put that it says "Naruto's Wallet", when in fact (as stated above) it says "なるとさいふ" making, what you keep editing it to, incorrect.  It'd be like saying that the ramen bar that Naruto loves, which is called "楽ラ一メン", has a sign labeling it as Ichiraku Ramen, and the sign translates to: "楽ラ一メン" when in fact it is the opposite.   DANIEL &#160;talk&#160; 00:20, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

chapter articles
Not sure about this so i'll ask before i proceed...For the chapter articles that don't have chapter covers or colored pages. Is it ok if an image from the chapter is used? --Cerez365 (talk) 19:04, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Oh i see, alrighty then ^^ --Cerez365 (talk) 19:12, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Re:archives
Not that I know of. I still have the the archive button on my taps list so I'm not sure the problem. If you have FireFox and using the NoScript addon (which I doubt you are), be sure to allow everything on the page cause I do remember that happening to me once.--TheUltimate3 ~Aspect of Wiki ~ 03:02, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * I see it using monobook. S im A nt 03:19, January 31, 2011 (UTC)