Talk:Chakra Rosary

Natures
Where is it said that the black orbs are made up of all natures? • Seelentau 愛 議 17:42, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * being the exact same and doing the exact same, I would guess that they are made out of the same.. But I could be wrong... I don't even care anymore to be honest.--Omojuze (talk) 17:57, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * Who says that they are the same, though? • Seelentau 愛 議 18:02, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * They aren't, they just look same and even function same, so they could have all natures just like TSB, we are not sure what they exactly are we can't tell whether they are Truth-Seeking Ball or not with current information, except we just know the name and its usage.--Naruto uzu6254 (talk) 18:08, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * @Tau by "the same" i meant they are both "black balls"... lolz--Omojuze (talk) 18:08, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * Where did the name come from?--Kuroiraikou (talk) 18:11, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thread:159828.--Naruto uzu6254 (talk) 18:15, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, isn't Hamura a user of this, instead of this?--Omojuze (talk) 18:17, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

Jesus, they work exactly the same as TSB. Let's just add chakra rosary as another name for TSB and save us the headache. After all, movie novel isn't exactly high up the canon ladder.--Elve Talk Page 18:28, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * YES, please... Please!..--Omojuze (talk) 18:33, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm all for that.--Kuroiraikou (talk) 18:39, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

Deletion
Feel free to argue it out amongst yourselves. Munchvtec (talk) 07:57, March 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * The name "Chakra Rosary" is already used in Truth-Seeking Balls. So I really don't see reason for this article to stay. I say delete. --JouXIII (talk) 08:17, March 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * If it's a derived technique, I don't see a problem with it staying.--Hawkeye2701 (talk) 09:01, March 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not. It works exactly like TSB. Chakra Rosary is simply second name to TSB. --JouXIII (talk) 09:40, March 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * I also see no point in keeping this article, although I think Toneri's usage of the TSB should be extented for a bit in the original TSB article cause some of his ways to use them weren't the ordinary ones (i.e. infusing TSB with chakra, splitting them into smaller balls, their use for Reincarnation Wheel techniques etc). Ravenlot 27 (talk) 11:28, March 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree with this suggestion. --JouXIII (talk) 11:44, March 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's a named derived technique which has shown different functions to it's parent technique, moulding into metal and duplicating themselves. So no, it's not practically the same as it's parent technique. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 05:12, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Again, Chakra Rosary is just another name for Truth-Seeking Balls(like Black Weapons[Kuroi Buki]) and is already mentioned in the TSB-article. A simple expansion on TSB-article would be enough. --JouXIII (talk) 12:36, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * If it's a named technique, which the trivia section seems to suggest that it is, then why would we delete the page? --SuperSajuuk (talk) 13:09, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Because the editor who made this article claimed that these two techniques were named in the Boruto-novel, when in fact they were just descriptions of elements launched by KinMomoshiki. Frankly, I see Chakra Rosary being same: description of nature of TSB, rosary made of Chakra.
 * So really, simple expansion on TSB-article would be more than enough, not entire article. --JouXIII (talk) 13:21, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * The whole basis of this deletion is because it's similar to it's parent technique. But that's literally the case with nearly all parent and derived techniques. The only thing that makes a derived technique have it's own article if it's either named or differs in function. This technique is both. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 13:33, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Again, simple exapansion in the TSB-article would be enough, something like:
 * "Toneri, while using Tenseigan Chakra Mode, can enhance his Truth-Seeking Balls by imbuing the chakra of Tenseigan Chakra Mode."
 * I sincerly see no reason for this article to exist, even less when its maker thought that descriptions of elements were names of techniques and claming that name of video game-only technique was used in the novel while in fact it wasn't there at all. --JouXIII (talk) 14:11, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's different enough to warrant it's own article and it's done like this throughout the wiki. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 15:08, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Different enough? Hardly.
 * Golden Wheel Reincrnation Explosion=Sword of Nunoboko.
 * Silver Wheel Reincrnation Explosion=Any time TSB is used for defense.
 * Cage=Six Red Yang Formation.
 * Heck, even in manga Obito's TSB was glowing when it was about to explode.
 * So yeah, I would hardly call it different enough. --JouXIII (talk) 15:35, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * JouXIII, you should note that if the deletion happens (which the chances of happening are close to zero), then I expect you to retroactively apply this logic to every other "derivative technique" on the wiki and call for their deletion under the same reason. And I expect that there will be resistance to such a movement. So be aware of what the outcome of this could mean for the wiki (which would be the removal of a lot of pertinent information). --SuperSajuuk (talk) 18:31, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * What I try to say here is that this article claims that Truth-Seeking Balls enhanced with power of Tenseigan Chakra Mode is called "Chakra Rosary", when in fact that's not the case. Chakra Rosary is simply alternative name to TSB, just like Rinnegan has alternative name of "the Eye of Six Paths". That is my problem here.
 * Seriously, if technique enhanced by other source of power is enough to warrant article, by that logic Flapping Chidori and Dark Chidori should have their own articles. But since they don't have, I don't see why this should have article.
 * Again, what Toneri is doing is simply powering up TSB with TGCM, something that can be simply expanded on TSB-article. --JouXIII (talk) 19:16, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Then argue that those chirdori techniques have their own articles; as they should. It's just a matter of people not wanting to make them. Since this page is already made, users won't really argue against it. I have no issue with it staying as is. Where is your proof that "Chakra Rosary" is just an alternative name? Munchvtec (talk) 01:07, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * Considering that Cheopz19 has already falsely claimed that these two techniques are "ancient Ōtsutsuki techniques", when in fact nothing like that was ever said in the novel, makes this article's credibility pretty questionable. I actually asked Cheopz19 credible sources, but he/she didn't answered me, so I had to check myself. --JouXIII (talk) 02:00, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * Noting that "Chakra Rosary" sounds more like a description than a technique name. But the term definitely exists in the novel, from what I know. Carry on. • Seelentau 愛 議 02:04, March 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * That is what I'm trying to say. --JouXIII (talk) 02:11, March 20, 2016 (UTC)

Shall the Deletion tag be taken down now? Not much more to say. Munchvtec (talk) 01:22, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * As long as whole article is deleted, sure. --JouXIII (talk) 01:27, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * Of course you'd say that :p Majority says the article remains, no? Munchvtec (talk) 01:30, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * Doesn't change the fact that this article is pointless and Toneri's use of TSB could simply be expanded on TSB-article. Beside, I thought we were suppose to present accurate information here, not fanon. --JouXIII (talk) 01:55, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * oh you see fanon. *looks around* where? Munchvtec (talk) 02:04, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * In the claim that enhanced version of TSB(which, again, can simply expanded on TSB-article) is called Chakra Rosary, when in fact CR is just another descriptive name to TSB, like Black Weapons. --JouXIII (talk) 02:16, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * All derived techniques are enhanced in some way, as the normal TSB hasn't be shown capable of converting into metal, duplicate themselves etc. And Seel acknowledge that it sounded like a description, not say it is 1. The same can be said about Heavenly Punishment sounding like a term. Also, trying to discredited this articles existence because of the user who created it, isn't going to get the article deleted, nor is calling it fanon. If a bunch of people support it being deleted, i'll live with myself, but as is, just seems like 1 vocal user has an issue with it. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 06:19, March 21, 2016 (UTC)