Talk:Surprise Attack Division

Members
Can we remove the table? Infobox lists members already. Same with other divisions. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:34, December 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * The table does seem pointless, especially since it is right next to the infobox. --Fmakck (talk) 19:51, December 4, 2010 (UTC)Fmakck


 * They were removed, and then they were added back because the infobox wasn't working properly. Now that the infobox is operational again, I'd agree with removing them. ~SnapperTo 20:09, December 4, 2010 (UTC)

I agreed as well.-- Ninja Sheik  20:16, December 4, 2010 (UTC)

Ambush Division
That sounds better and shorter than Surprise Attack Division. What if someone renamed it to this?
 * It would be changed back because 奇襲部隊 translates into Surprise Attack Division.--TheUltimate3 ~Keeper of Lore~ 16:53, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

Team
Recently I posted some pictures of teams of Akatsuki and Allied Force, I could replace the current by recent?--人間のサメ 18:20, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Not really a fan of those images, mostly because of the background. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 18:16, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Subdivision
Hey we could add that this is a subdivision what do yous think ? --Jmootam1999 (talk) 22:49, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Subdivision of what? Name is as translated, and it's already mentioned to be a part of the Allied Shinobi Forces. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:59, March 9, 2013 (UTC)

But don't you see the division as very small in numbers compared to other divisions so it could be subdivision if you think about it ? If we look at the way the members of the aquad fight then maybe we could place them into a larger division or being part of two divisions? --Jmootam1999 (talk) 23:03, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * They're not part of the Great Battle Regiment, and the article in no way implies that. Go to the main ASF article and you'll see that they're all considered supporting divisions. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 23:19, March 9, 2013 (UTC)