Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-32457608-20170823143115/@comment-32569165-20170825111722

Mr. Grave wrote: Crazylazyguy wrote: I thought we were the logical ones here and we weren't haters/fanboys of somebody. You know very well that this part of your sentence is as bad as this guy talking about Itachi being invincible and on par with Minato's speed.

I don't really care what Kishimoto has to say, as he fell in my eyes long before he spoke in this interview. I'm not hating on Sakura. I don't ride the 'hate Sakura' bandwagon.

Fact of the matter is @Ghost's theory dictates that Sakura is part of this ancient Ninshu clan and that potential revelation in itself suggests that she may become relevant again. My argument against that is that it's unlikely because Kishimoto said that he has given up on Sakura and that is Word of God AND Sakura's skillset or her narrative role as a damsel in distress hasn't changed as of Gaiden. Meaning, Kishimoto is not trying to re-introduce her or creep her into the role of the main heroine, as he did with Hinata when he realized that she was getting good fan feedback.

You have criticism in store for Kishimoto? That's fine. Doesn't make his word invalid.

Stop making it look like I just posted a dank meme shitting on Sakura or something malicious of that sort. I have never said I have criticism on Kishimoto. Of course I respect him and his work, otherwise we wouldn't be talking right now. I am simply saying that he fell in my eyes after a couple of other interviews. I won't go into detail as to why, it's just my personal opinion that any artist should do what he has in mind with his work and not listen to what his fanbase has to say, that's all.

Kishimoto isn't giving any female character spotlight for that matter. it's not just Sakura.

As to the theory about Sakura knowing Ninshu/being Otsutsuki related, I have not denied that it is very stupid and pointless.