Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-34115-20150626061048/@comment-28861328-20150627012758

Before I begin my post, I would like to clear the air that I have no personal problem with SuperSajuuk. We have our tiffs, but nothing like what Elve and I use to have, so I find it somewhat puzzling that my name keeps being brought up. Sajuuk and I haven't had a serious angry encounter since I was first promoted quite some time ago, so let's not blow things out of proportion.

Since this is a matter of wiki discussion, however, I must give my two cents.

Many of you may remember that I was one of the ones who Supported Sajuuk when he initially put his name in the hat to become a Sysop (a decision that, instead, lead to him becoming a mod). That is why it seems somewhat silly that there are users here throwing my name around as being among the group that is somehow "out to get" Sajuuk. The reality is that no one is out to get him. No one wants to ban him temporarily, much less permanently (at least to my knowledge, no one does); this seems to be more of an issue of how he preforms his duties and uses his rights.

Sajuuk is an abrasive personality on this wiki. I had always suspected he was pulling users into the chat to rant about the sysops, particularly Snapper2, whom he frequently complains about. Because Wikia Chat has issues with my internet, however, I avoid it whenever possible and thus wasn't able to confirm my suspicions until Omojuze spoke up and brought it to light. That rubs me wrong. He has said in this thread that he does so to avoid people "attacking him", which is ironic, considering he does it to attack others.

This whole Sysop vs. Sajuuk debate is all well and good, but let me show you all some recent examples of Sajuuk-Sysop interaction:
 * 1) If you look at these two links, you will see a recent conversation between Sajuuk and Snapper. It is very clear that a user came to a sysop with an issue, which right or wrong, they should. Sajuuk jumps in, rather than waiting for Snapper to ask him his version of events, and launches an attack, first on the user, then turns his frustration on Snapper. His comments, I might add, about his user rights are part of the reason I believe he should no longer have mod rights. It is clear to me that he views them as a status symbol from this post alone.
 * 2) In another very recent debacle, you can see his exchange with TheUltimate. For context, The Ultimate was intervening in an argument between Tau and Sajuuk. In order to sort things out, he sorted the two into different sections of his talk page (both can still be plainly seen). In this instance, Sajuuk is once again displaying a very aggressive disposition, and also is demonstrating another troublesome trait of his, which has been addressed before in this thread. He has a tendency, whenever he wants to get his way, to immediately threaten Staff intervention. They won't intervene, mind you, save in extraordinary circumstances, but Sajuuk seems to be captivated by the idea of Staff swooping in to "punish" those who don't agree with him. Since, apparently, according to this exchange, they do agree with his position. I did some digging so that I could make sure to bring in both sides of this, in order to remain fair: you will see in this, that TheUltimate was very calm, non-insulting, and actually trying to get to the bottom of things (as a Sysop should) in stark contrast to Sajuuk's rampaging.
 * 3) Finally, this post is the last bit of troubling behavior I have noticed. Don't act in a manner that lines up with Sajuuk's expectations of you? Watch out, you may have a thread brought against you to have you stripped of your rights. Naturally, Dantman would not have to follow up with it, since the thread would have been made in such a vindictive fashion, but Sajuuk is not the authority on the behavior of this wiki's users. Especially when he has such poor behavior himself.
 * 4) * Also of note is this, whereby Sajuuk can blatantly be seen giving a command to a sysop. Not a request, not asking, but commanding. It also is proof of what others have been saying: he complains when Sysops do nothing, and then when they do, he goes into complete attack mode.

This is all I have to say on this matter. I will spectate, but I will not respond to Sajuuk or anyone else, in order to allow Dantman to filter through the responses and make his own judgement. But I do ask users following this issue to think objectively. Do not turn this into an "us vs. them" debate. It isn't. We are simply trying to decide what is best for our community. I do believe this shows that Sajuuk should not have moderator powers, however.