Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20160407135539/@comment-25141191-20160410183432

How can they be Official translations when they're wrong? If the translator looked through the source information, to bring up correct translations, where is the argument against that? The only reason I've read countering him is self flagellation, based on an appeal to authority to Viz Media? And the use of bringing up "Ohnoki" is perfectly acceptable, because if that wouldn't be acceptable, why would this be any more acceptable?

The argument given by the translator is an from an empirical point of view based on correct translations. If ViZ is wrong they're wrong. End of story. You have no point.