Narutopedia:Sysop Requests


 * If you need the assistance of a forum moderator or forum administrator, please go here.

This page is for users to request the action or attention of one of the Narutopedia's several sysops. If you require a sysop's assistance, please leave a request under one of the following headings and a sysop will get to it as soon as they are able. You may also contact one of the Narutopedia's sysops directly; a list of the wiki's sysops can be viewed here.

Note to sysops: If you have dealt with or intend to deal with an issue, please add to it. Please also archive this page from time to time to ensure the page is kept clean of completed requests.

READ FIRST!
Please check here to see what section your request fits into:
 * Do you feel one of the wiki's pages needs to be protected from editing? Would you like to request that a protected page be unprotected? Is a sysop needed to modify a protected page? If so, please click here to make a protection request
 * Is there a page on the wiki that you believe needs to be deleted? Has something been deleted that you would like to have restored? If so, please click here to make a deletion request
 * Has a user vandalized the wiki? Does somebody continue to make certain kinds of edits after repeated warnings? Would you like a block to be adjusted or removed? If so, please click here to make a block request
 * Any other request that doesn't fit one of the above? Please click here to make a miscellaneous request

Protection-related requests

 * Toneri Ōtsutsuki - Repeated edit warring over the word "handsome", despite many confirmations of the word being used in official materials. --Sajuuk Talk Page 15:21, November 4, 2014 (UTC)

Deletion-related requests

 * User:Neji of the gentle fist profile page. it was created by another user. Munchvtec (talk) 06:41, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * "User account "Neji of the Gentle Fists" does not exist or has never logged in on this wiki." ~SnapperTo 08:09, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Red link=Page does not exist.--Mangekyō Sharingan Izuna.svg JOA20 08:22, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. Please use next time--~Ultimate Supreme  13:59, October 29, 2014 (UTC)


 * This, this one and also this one as well. Fanart. Thanks in advance. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 03:25, October 29, 2014 (UTC)


 * File:P._051_-_Great_Toad_Sage.png ty--Elve Talk Page 16:04, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * "For non-urgent deletions, please simply add to the page you wish to be deleted." ~SnapperTo 17:35, October 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * This image. Fanart. Violates image policy. Many thanks. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 22:56, November 7, 2014 (UTC)

Blocking-related requests

 * - Repeatedly deleting personal talkpage despite multiple warnings and being advised to use a sandbox for experimenting instead.--Mangekyō Sharingan Izuna.svg JOA20 10:13, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * I see UltimateSupreme blocked for only a month. Considering the user's long history of these edits to their own talkpage, it is obvious the user has no intention of contributing anything more than vandalising their own talkpage and I recommend a longer block in this instance. I also request his talkpage editing rights be revoked for the duration of his block, for obvious reasons --Sajuuk Talk Page 11:35, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * Remove or lower the block on . The contribution made by this user does not justify a 1 year block with no reason given whatsoever for the block. --Sajuuk Talk Page 20:50, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * Did you see what Faze did, Saj? Moving crucial pages to the wiki to a fanon page? I think it's best we don't let it get worse. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 20:54, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * I did, it doesn't deserve a one year block with no reason given. At most, it deserves a 3 day block with a reason of movepage vandalism, not 1 year with zero reason. To me, and probably others, that would look like abuse of block tools. --Sajuuk Talk Page 20:57, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Ignoring the warnings on his own talkpage for adding junk trivia points and the three-reverts war conflict. — Shakhmoot Nadeshiko Village Symbol.svg (Talk) 19:34, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * Since I could not see any signs that there were any sysops online at the time, I've taken the liberty to place a 2 hour probationary block on this user. A sysop has been notified and will review the block as appropriate to the policy. I felt it necessary to inform the other sysops here that I performed this block, so as not to be seen as abusing the tool. --Sajuuk Talk Page 19:45, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * Suspecting is an alt for Paladin78, based on the contributions being the exact same, but I will leave this to a sysop to deal with. --Sajuuk  Talk Page 20:33, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * - still adding pointless trivia.--Mangekyō Sharingan Izuna.svg JOA20 19:29, November 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Multiple image policy violations, despite previous warnings. --Sajuuk Talk Page 15:47, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * and the sockpuppet ~ IndxcvNovelist  →talk • contribs • watty← 18:26, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Include - He's harassing users and supporting Glassliplover's vandalism. ~ IndxcvNovelist  →talk • contribs • watty← 18:34, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * I see Tau managed to block them. As it's not my place to edit existing blocks, I'll only point out that sockpuppets should be indefinitely blocked, rather than only blocked for a year. --Sajuuk Talk Page 18:50, November 6, 2014 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

 * Please add links to this page and Project:Forum Requests to the Community tab on the navbar. --Sajuuk Talk Page 10:39, October 28, 2014 (UTC);
 * Minor addition to MediaWiki:Forum-policies-and-faq after the bolded statement at the top: "If you come across any users violating some part of this policy document, please report it to a forum moderator or forum administrator via the requests page." Thanks. --Sajuuk Talk Page 11:36, November 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * I just noticed that there are pages within the Forum: namespace which have been protected. At the time, this made sense but now it's no longer necessary. Could all pages that have been protected in that namespace be unprotected? By default, with the newer forums, these are automatically locked to those who don't have the forumoldedit right. Thanks. --Sajuuk Talk Page 12:36, November 7, 2014 (UTC)