User talk:Lordofninjas1

Hello Lordofninjas1, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Daichi page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- TheUltimate3 (Talk) 20:54, July 31, 2012

Names
I have not followed your topics much in the three Rasengan variety articles closely, but here's how it is: if it got a name in an official source, that's the name we use, and it's up for fans of the series to know it. There will be no renaming of articles, nor will there addition of fan-originated names to the article. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:39, March 27, 2013 (UTC)

I think at least one has been mentioned in a game (again not sure which game its been a while since I've played the games) one of the discussions isn't even about "fan names". there is no argument about Renaming the Articles and I understand everything about that (although the person I am talking to on the matter keeps thinking I want to rename it when I say nothing of the sort) so saying renaming articles to me was a waste of breath. and why won't fan names be put on the article even on the trivia section (and since the names are so widely known and used anyways its more of a nickname for them anyways). Lordofninjas1 (talk) 22:44, March 27, 2013 (UTC)

Because they do not come from any official sources. If a technique has been named in any media, be it manga, databook, artbook, anime, movie or game, we'll use that, anything that doesn't, we don't. The closest thing we do of using fan-originated names is when we have to create an article on a subject, without an official title being provided in any media. Generic Sealing Technique is an example of that. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:52, March 27, 2013 (UTC)

did you not see that I am not asking for renaming I'm asking for Trivia I understand why its not put on the Bio Part of the Article but why can it not be referenced in the Trivia Section? Lordofninjas1 (talk) 23:03, March 27, 2013 (UTC)

I get you're not asking for renames, I'm saying that they should be kept out even of trivia sections, because they have no official standing. Also, for future reference, next time you want to make a topic about something that applies to multiple articles, either pick an article talk that is related to those articles, or just pick one article, and mention the other two in it as well, keeps the discussion in one place, seeing all the back and forth between three talk pages is pointless and drags things around. That said, I see no point in keeping the three discussions in either topic you created active. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 23:43, March 27, 2013 (UTC)

you have things in Trivia sections on other things that have no official standing on them (trust me I know, I can't exactly remember which articles they are but I know its out there) and besides whats wrong with putting what I suggest in the trivia section... absolutely nothing it doesn't hurt the article in any way, makes it more accessable to fans who know it by that name, etc. etc. so really its only an improvement. I'm not really sure what you mean about keeping something that applies to multiple articles in all those or pick one (I mean I know what it means but I think I've been trying to do that its the other guy I've noticed that been jumping around more and posting stuff like that as far as I know I've been trying to keep the Super Rasengan Discussion in the Super Rasengan Talk Page etc etc and mainly just reiterating things I've said before in the other pages or making small references to them in the beginning) Lordofninjas1 (talk) 23:53, March 27, 2013 (UTC)

Praise the gods... also lies, the topics on big ball rasengan and supreme ultimate rasengan pages are the same, only tornado rasengan one is different and that's again you just arguing for the sake of arguing--Elveonora (talk) 23:58, March 27, 2013 (UTC)

ok gonna be a little rude/funny right now. this is an A/B conversation C your way out of it Elveonora. and thats what I was saying that I believe them to be the same etc. etc. (you kinda just reiterated what I just said minus the Tornado Rasengan thing) and not really you too are arguing for the sake of arguing. I wouldn't have continued the argument had you not commented back and continued it. Lordofninjas1 (talk) 00:20, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

The point being, there was no reason to bring the very same topic to 2 talkpages--Elveonora (talk) 00:25, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

its not the same topic one is about Bringing Fan Names on the Super Rasengan Page and one is about Bringing Fan Names on the Big Ball Rasengan Page. so its still in topic with the articles they are on etc. etc. the way I interpreted the same topic is like I had an argument on one page and then got lazy and decided to Copy and Paste that on another one and the discussions/Arguments on each page have the same title but delved into different Subjects and other such things so therefore they are different Topics. Lordofninjas1 (talk) 00:39, March 28, 2013 (UTC)