User talk:ZabuzaTheDemon

Welcome
Hello, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the A (Fourth Raikage) page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.


 * Here are several other pages that can help you with where to begin-


 * Wiki Activity – A great first stop, because you can see what pages other people have been editing, and where you can help out.


 * Help Pages - If you're new to editing or having trouble getting something to work, the help pages are a great place to start.


 * Forums - The forums are used for a number of things, from proposing policy changes to general wiki discussions. Please use Naruto Answers for asking general questions.


 * Administrators - A list of 's administrators. If you need additional assistance or are having troubles, feel free to contact an administrator with the details.


 * Special:Upload - A page that provides you a form for uploading images easily.

Always sign in before you edit – This is so that we can recognize you!

Always sign your posts - When leaving a message on someone's talk page, remember to sign it by clicking either the 'signature' button or by typing four tildes ( ). This is so the person knows who to reply to.

There's a lot to do around here, so we hope you'll stay with us and make many more contributions. And again, welcome to. Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Dantman (talk) 05:28, December 19, 2014 (UTC)

Re:
Still, edits like this "Third Raikage" are redundant and pointless. Also, please make proper use of redirects, don't do this either: "Third Raikage". I have no issues with you adding references to the article, but please read and abide by the Manual of Style's WikiText Style and make proper editing of links such as this: "Third Raikage". And also, when leaving messages on a user's talkpage, please make use of headers (" == == ") to introduce a new message and separate it from old messages on the user's talkpage, for instance: "== (insert header title here) ==" use that to introduce a new message on a user's talkpage. ~• WS7125 [Mod] 04:21, December 19, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Yahiko and the Second Shinobi World War
According to what we know, that's all correct. It doesn't fit into the timeline, I think, and it contradicts Choji's words, but well... it's what the databook says. • Seelentau 愛 議 13:22, December 20, 2014 (UTC)

Nagato and Konan both died at 35yrs old, they were actually each 2 years older than Yahiko and 4 years older than Obito, meaning when they first met Obito and Zetsu they were 15, 17 and 17 while Obito was still 13. Also Yes the ages are trustworthy. The only thing I can see that is entirely not trustworthy at all is them trying to say Hiruzen became Hokage 14 years before Naruto's birth which is entirely wrong by ALL other given info. Minato and Kushina would of been 41 if they never died, meaning they were both 6 years older than Nagato and Konan and 8 years older than Yahiko. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 16:37, December 27, 2014 (UTC)

Wait a minute Itachi, let's take this slowly. First of you are the one that convinced me that Obito was much older than 13, I hope you don't change that. Secondly I am confused on how you did the calculation for Yahiko, I fully understand Nagato-Konan.ZabuzaTheDemon (talk) 08:19, December 28, 2014 (UTC)

Listen carefully. According to Kishi and Studio Pierrot, Kakashi who was born September 15th was stil 12 at Kanabi Bridge. Obito is born February 10th and he is born the same year as Kakashi. That means Obito himself was 13 still when he met the Ame Orphans. DB4 says Nagato(Born September 29th) and Konan(Born February 20th died at 35 while Obito was 31. Yahiko also born February 20th was 15 when he died which was soon after meeting Obito. Do the math here Zabuza.. Nagato and Konan are 2 years older than Yahiko, who is 2 years older than Obito. So at the moment that Yahiko died, Obito was 13, Yahiko was 15, Nagato and Konan were 17. Minato was 24 the year after that so 23-17= 6 so Minato is 6 years older than Nagato and Konan, 8 years older than Yahiko, and 10 years older than Obito and Kakashi. One last time, Obito at the time of Nagato and Konans deaths was 31, Obito from the Kakashi Gaiden all the way until Yahiko dies was still 13. You understand it now? ItachiWasAHero (talk) 09:06, December 28, 2014 (UTC)

Are you saying your timeline is incorrect, it took me days to understand this because I was actually using your timeline as my focal point example, I thought Nagato died at 16 ANB which was wrong, in fact it was 17 ANB as Seelantau said in his timeline. But why are you dismissing Obito's age, you convinced me he wasn't 13, in fact much older based on the Genin age. NOW I FULLY UNDERSTAND, I will start working on your timeline Block by Block. So the first Block we should change is the Yahiko-Nagato-Konan death and birth, also I find it interesting you used other characters timeline, I never thought about this way, I think we can do this for other characters, interesting approach. ZabuzaTheDemon (talk) 13:40, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

Yes the timeline I have on my page is imperfect and outdated to the point I forgot about it, but it seems your on a mission to update and fix it and I am ok with that. Just remember whatever changes you want to make we need to talk about first. You can do the changes we already talked about on my page just now too. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 16:26, December 30, 2014 (UTC)

Dully Noted ZabuzaTheDemon (talk) 16:28, December 30, 2014 (UTC)

Here ya go
http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:ItachiWasAHero/Timeline#UPDATING.21.21 ItachiWasAHero (talk) 13:29, December 25, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Edit
All that user SSJ2AJB did was add a image, nothing got removed from Kushina's ability section? --Sarutobii2 (talk) 08:57, December 28, 2014 (UTC)

Re: C-rank edit
The editor that undid your revision is female — just so you don't misgender her again.

I cannot speak to why she undid your edit altogether - that's simply how she chose to handle the edit. The fact that it wasn't written in a grammatically correct format may have contributed to that, and while you did leave a reference, there was no reference heading so it would have "broke" the page.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 17:21, January 5, 2015 (UTC)