Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-7292165-20141211192509/@comment-2125188-20141216203209

We use official titles chapters, episodes, movies, ova's, video games, databooks, omake's, canon arcs, etc. Why not the filler arcs? Because they're non-canon? Other media that i previously stated are non-canon too, but they still use official titles. Why should we treat the filler arcs any different?

SuperSajuuk wrote: Snapper2 wrote: You're confusing "official" with "canon". Anime stuff is not necessarily canon, but it is official since, you know, it exists. The anime is only canon to those who have never read the manga, otherwise it's only an adaptation of someone else's work, which doesn't make it canon at all. The only parts of the anime you could even remotely consider "canon" are possibly episodes referencing manga chapters, but that's about it.

Why are we even talking about canonicity anyway? We all know they're non-canon. But like as stated by Snapper2, the Naruto wikia covers and encompasses the whole naruto franchise, regardless of canonicity. Canon or non-canon shouldn't come into question here at all. Just because something is non-canon, doesn't mean it's not official. The arc names we're from Studio Perriot, so they are official titles. They are official titles until stated otherwise by Kishimoto, which i don't think will ever happen.