Infobox talk:Nagato

Picture
I've changed the cover picture to the Color Image from chapter 442. This is the actual picture of Nagato, not Pain. The old pic should either be used on the God Realm section or on Yahiko's page. If somebody want's to change it, please just change it to a higher quality scan and not just the old God Realm pic, please. --NurXang (talk) 20:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't we atleast shrink this image down a bit so it's somewhat better to look at. Currently anyone can see how low teh quality is.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 20:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Here's where I am coming from. Pain and Nagato are the same people. No matter how you look at it, they are the same person. The image of the Deva Path is the first image we have of Pain. Similar to how we use the pictures of 12 year old Naruto instead of 15-16 year old Naruto. The picture of the Deva Path can't be used in Yahiko's page because that is not Yahiko, as he is dead.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 20:59, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I understand what you are saying, but Pain and Nagato are not the same thing. Pain (or the 6 paths) is a technique used by Nagato. If the page was still focused on Pain then i would agree with you, but it is now titled the Nagato page. This is the best manga image we have of Nagato's body, not God Realm Pain. --NurXang (talk) 21:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow, you guys actually went and got this crap protected. Jesus... I'm out, guys, I'm out. I thought i'd give this wiki thing a try for a while, but no, you tools had to go and pull this crap. Really neat how this works, actually. Go ahead and kick me out or whatever, but i think that is is a load of crap if this is how you guys solve disputes. Peace, --NurXang (talk) 21:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Response to the First Thing. Not sure why I missed it; But they are the same thing. That's why the Paths were so different and unusual. Nagato was the Six Paths. As such he first appeared as the Deva Path. That's why it was being used. In truth the page MUST focus on Pain moreso than Nagato because if you don't, Nagato has done NOTHING but stand in a tree and cough up blood.
 * Response to the Second Thing; We aren't kicking you out. Dantman decided to prevent a Revert War that would have dragged on into the night (Because your edits weren't vandalism, you were in no danger of blocking. At least from me.)--TheUltimate3 (talk) 21:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * (Edit conflicted) You two were revert warring, thus it was protected. It was protected with the old image because our policy is to use the older version of things when protecting things against revert wars. Discussion is still open, though Talk:Nagato has a bit more intensive conversation so that might be the better place to discuss. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 3, 2009 @ 21:49 (UTC)
 * hahahahah. you guys can go ahead and login to a page titled Nagato and see somebody that isn't him. that's fine. As a matter of fact, i really don't care at this point. because it turns out that this whole wiki operates much differently than i read when i signed up. The reason i said you could kick me out is because i see no further reason to log in again, mainly because i have no connections to admins, nor have i "been here longer" ( a line i've been told enough times to count on both hands), nor do i have a banhammer to threaten everybody with. Well done! :D--NurXang (talk) 22:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * But they are him, Pain and Nagato are the same person. And for the readers the first body he uses is most relevant since that's the first image anyone watching the series will encounter.
 * As for your comments on the banhammer, that has absolutely no relevance. No-one has threatened to ban you and that's not the reason we have sysop flags, sysops work for the community, they don't control it. The only reason you'd be banned is if you were doing something against the community and wouldn't stop. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 3, 2009 @ 22:14 (UTC)
 * I may have actually waved it. I honestly do not remember, but I do wave it threateningly to keep some members in line. From where I stand, it goes like this. 2 Camps. Good Members and Problem Members. Good Members get the banhammer speech when revert wars start (be it adding something unnecessary and it gets reverted, or unneeded), then you have the Problem Members, who get banned out right. If I did wave the banhammer to NurXang, it for the former (the Good Member part).--TheUltimate3 (talk) 22:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I believe he thought you'd ban him when he read this: Response to the Second Thing; We aren't kicking you out. Dantman decided to prevent a Revert War that would have dragged on into the night (Because your edits weren't vandalism, you were in no danger of blocking. At least from me.)--TheUltimate3 (talk) 21:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC) *shrugs*  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 22:21, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Wow that's what it sounded like? God it sounded so much better in my head. Like I said, he was in no danger. I don't block revert wars...unless you know their were actual vandals. Disagreements go back and forth until I go to sleep or someone of higher authority, and or, just smarter comes along.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 22:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Link Ame Orphans
Can someone please link Ame Orphans as I made a page for them.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 21:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * No. You I am going to delete that page. I'll do it now.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 21:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * May i ask why it should be deleted?  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 21:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It was a joke...I added it to the infobox...--TheUltimate3 (talk) 21:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't do that. You had me hear upset cause I put in so much work to make sure I didn't break an rules etc. Thanks though Ultimate. Good joke too.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 21:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * *slap*, you're two days late with that april fools... ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 3, 2009 @ 21:52 (UTC)
 * /cry--TheUltimate3 (talk) 21:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)