User talk:SuperSajuuk

Notice: This talkpage may be archived without warning.

WARNING: If you post on this talkpage with intimidating behaviour or harassment, you will be blocked by a sysop on sight!

Where have you been...
...because no one has followed that rule since it was posted. Not even the mods, which was about a year ago. Is this seriously something you just added without conversing with the mods because I don't see anything that approves of that rule. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 09:12, September 4, 2014 (UTC)


 * Unless you can provide proof in recent days that this rule is something that should be followed for now on within recent days, I'm reverting your edit. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 09:22, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * People making it later doesn't prove anything and you know that wasn't what I was asking. I need proof of you discussing with a mod of this rule being established from now on recently.--OmegaRasengan (talk) 09:28, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * I am saying that you did because you were the one that added that rule there from the page's edit history. Do not whine to me when I've been asking you to explain yourself thoroughly. And do not go making accusations that I'm "lying" to get you in trouble. I'm trying to have this situation dealt with, not getting you into trouble which you keep on insisting on to get me into trouble.--OmegaRasengan (talk) 09:35, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * You say that, and then I see this. The rule to delete pages before 3am was added by you according to the edit history. And regardless of the policy existing before that addition, nobody has correctly followed it. I leave Ultimate3 or whatever mod to settle this.--OmegaRasengan (talk) 09:49, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

Do we have a partnership with Crunchyroll that I'm unaware of? I'm not agreeing with this rule at all. ~Hakinu (talk 12:50, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

Uploading
Thanks for the tip on uploading images! :)
 * Sorry about the lack of signature! Hrathgrath (talk) 13:45, September 5, 2014 (UTC

re: kudos
It's stupid that it can be done in the first place, so why not?--Elveonora (talk) 12:42, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

Deadlock
I created this but had no idea about this page. Can you help me out? And also, which is more suitable to you? Thanks. -- WindStar7125   05:06, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * Seems like Snapper2 did the work. Never mind.-- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 02:36, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Images
Hello SuperSajuuk! Thank you for informing me that he was violating one of the rules of uploading, this does not repitirá! I'm new in narutopédia and with some difficulty in editing this.

...
...Um... are shipping discussions not allowed here or heavily frowned upon? I thought shippers and stuff weren't allowed here... I'm confused... -- WindStar7125   21:49, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Of course. Right here. I am very tired of seeing such unnecessary discussions on the wiki activity page.-- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:53, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes. Thank you. And if it were on a talk page, I could delete it? I'm not a rollback, wouldn't I get in trouble for deleting any talk page discussions? -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:58, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the head's up. I can already guess why such stupid (and somewhat uncomfortable) discussions are not permitted on this wiki, but I still want a full explanation why, please. Better I know things rather than make a hypothesis and guess why. :) -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 22:05, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh I know they can't be on the wiki, but I was talking about specifically why they can't be on the forums. A lot of fanon goes on in the forums, but what makes pairings/shippings different from other fanon on the forums?-- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 22:10, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. An unspoken rule. I get that. Anyway thanks. Also, can you show me where the agreement was to ban such unwarranted consultations? I'd like to see others' opinions on the matter please to get a better sense of the rules around here. If you can't, thanks anyway. :)-- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 22:24, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, thank you very much! I'll read this thing. Anyway, I apologize for not reporting this to you on an earlier date. I noticed the discussion when it was first created and I was like "Dafuq? That's not allowed here, right? Well, some sysop is going to lay down his authority, so I'll back off from this one and not get involved." Then I kept seeing the thread, much to my irritation, and then when I saw the discussion get close to 100 messages, I was like "Oh hell no. I have got to stop this idiocy from expanding and soiling this well-oiled wiki..." and that's how we got here. Again, I apologize for not noting this earlier. After reading the discussion you linked to me, I'll do my best to make sure this wiki doesn't become polluted with such ludicrousness and stupidity (yes, I used that word, for I am very against pairing discussions). So thanks again! :)-- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 22:43, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

... (again)
This qualifies as a what-if scenario, which isn't allowed, right?-- WindStar7125   23:50, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

Re: so...
I usually have been editing instead of double posting and you told me to tell @kind hearted on there talk page so i did. Yeah i'll use the preview from now on so you don't have to worry. even though there's nothing to worry about anyways. Your the only one that says my edits are useless and not needed while others say i am helpful like snapper22. Munchvtec (talk) 17:35, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

You have said on multiple occasions that my edits are useless and do nothing to help the wiki. I don't want a response to this message, just reminding you. Munchvtec (talk) 17:43, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

Re: MessageWallUserTags
A discussion first would be nice~Ultimate Supreme  02:07, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

I just had a look at the script and it assumes that you have walls enabled (even to work just on forums). So maybe you could ask on the script's talkpage about it or we could just do it like we do on Naruto Answers in article comments?--~Ultimate Supreme  14:46, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Opinion please
Last week I made a section on Kirisame's page about what he did in the OVA. I would like you to check if it's okay. Im asking because if it's bad I don't want to make anymore. Munchvtec (talk) 12:30, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Re: For the first time here, I'm gonna be real serious
You're input helps a lot. To be quite honest, I am not a fan of forums to begin with, and I'm tired of seeing them. Yes, they create arguments, and a lot of fanon takes place there. It really doesn't help the wiki, it just adds to a user's editcount. -- WindStar7125   12:15, September 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Then I think we should enforce it. For the time being, I've decided to take a break from forums unless I have to participate (such as reaching a consensus or executive decisions). Before, I couldn't help but respond to and correct the fanon that many users put on those forums (Example: "Naruto will get the Rinnegan"). But that leads to arguments worse than what we have on article talkpages. I thought forums were a way to end annoying edit conflicts, and other reasons attached to it. I also thought it was a way to talk about other Naruto-related things happening in the real world (such as updates on the Naruto: The Last movie). We've laid down the law on many things on this wiki, so why not Snapper2's thread? Don't get me wrong though. I'm not suggesting that we get rid of forums altogether or that I have an obscene hatred towards them or anything, but they've gotten out of hand. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:43, September 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Eh, you don't have to be sorry. I cause enough trouble there by fighting with other users. I decided to take a break because of one: myself, two: the fanon there, and three: the endless arguments. It's better for the wiki if I'm not there for the time being. I don't need to make things get off topic and heated because of remarks others make about me. Again, not trying to play the victim, I'm just as much a bully on these forums. It's one thing to have a relevant argument over the subject (like how it happens on article talkpages). It's another thing altogether when users (like myself and others) take things personally and argue about things that deviate from the topic at hand. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:57, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Kakashi introduction arc
Hey SuperSajuuk about the information on kakashi's page i deleted. Why is that information in Kakashi's introduction arc. I know its anime only content but it could of taken place anywhere from the start of the Land of Waves Arc to the Chūnin Exam Arc. Without knowing the precise time of those events inst a reason to put it in the introduction arc. --Kris.gilson.12 (talk) 11:12, September 23, 2014 (UTC)

Hey whats up
I don't even know if this the right place to ask this but I'll give it a try. I remember you saying that you are not able to make lets plays for the newer naruto games. im just curious as to why since others have made them. Munchvtec (talk) 14:02, September 24, 2014 (UTC)

re: moderator
Thanks for the privilege.--Elveonora (talk) 13:33, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * Hm, may you assist me with it a little? So:
 * First, I use this http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Special:MyPage/Sig right? What should I write there tho?
 * Second, once it's done, I use the name of the signature in special preferences and add mod next to it, right?
 * --Elveonora (talk) 13:55, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, works I guess--Elve Talk Page 14:30, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nah, thanks for the offer, but red is fine. Unless it's mandatory or something :P--Elve Talk Page 14:34, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

Sasuke page
what is thread sasuke page ? --Twelvethrower24 (talk) 16:58, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

Re: pairing threads
Noted, will do. Thank you.--Reliops (talk) 20:59, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * @Sajuuk, If I'm correct, I'd say @Reliops and others in the Chapter 693 thread are planning on trying to allow pairing discussions here. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:05, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * It seems that I'll have to make an exception on not participating in forum talk. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 21:08, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

Forums
Excuse me, but I'm a little interested in what ideas you have for the forums. So far, after the pairings discussion, I think some more things have to be established. What do you think?

Edit: You claimed here while responding to Munchvtec that you "think there's a few misconceptions floating around about the board itself and that needs to be addressed." and that you "may make a post about it and clear up these misconceptions and lay down exactly what the forums are for and what the wiki is not." Elaborate please? That'd be a forum I'd gladly participate in. -- WindStar7125   04:18, September 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, Ok, so you're waiting for @Foxie. And by the way, thanx for the congrats. I don't know why I became a chat moderator and rollback, but I'm glad anyway. :D Also, in the forums, shouldn't I have that red marker next to my name? -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 19:01, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Edits
Oh I'm sorry, I made ​​a mistake when the first edit. And the second just fix it. I don't have rollback ability so I made 2 edits... once again sorry.  Fa te _ Ka ge   Talk! My Work  Wiki 1   Wiki 2 05:11, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

oh okay. Munchvtec (talk) 12:40, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

what happend
why didnt anyone write the last naruto anime for the wikia they have the manga but not the anime --Twelvethrower24 (talk) 13:15, September 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * what? you need to be more clear. Munchvtec (talk) 13:17, September 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * why didnt no one write for the anime but for the manga yet? --Twelvethrower24 (talk) 13:19, September 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * There are not many people who write summaries here but it'll be done by today okay. They never go blank for more then a day or two. Munchvtec (talk) 13:21, September 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * And this, my friends, belongs on the article's talkpage, not here. -_- --Sajuuk Talk Page 17:15, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

sorry i should have told him. Munchvtec (talk) 17:23, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

New Arc Thread
Some intend on creating a new arc based on their own consensus in this thread. What's your opinion on that? -- WindStar7125   05:13, September 27, 2014 (UTC)

RE: Quick Suggestion
Just noticed your message. Will get to it soon--~Ultimate Supreme  09:25, September 27, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
Sorry you had to clean up Kabuto's talk page, still getting use to the wiki. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 14:05, September 27, 2014 (UTC)

I art here
I'm here. I'm in a bit of a mix of predicaments that keeps me away from being active at the moment. I'm ill for starters. Fell down a flight of stairs and hurt my foot pretty badly. In addition I have attracted the flu. Secondly I've been working so very, very hard to do a semester's work load in one month due to the fact that I have twice the amount of work this semester. Thirdly I've been a bit baffled by the odd rules that have been taken into action since I left, and the unwillingness I find for any change. It's not very encouraging. ~Hakinu (talk 12:04, September 29, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Hookaborted
In reference to the message you left on the talk page of w:c:dev:Talk:FileUsageAuto-update, would you mind attempting to rename the image once more please? The hookaborted error message is returned from the API and it seems that it might've been a misconfiguration on Wikia's side. If you wouldn't mind trying to rename it again at some point that would be awesome. Thanks! — Foodbandlt (talk) 15:51, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * After talking to a few others, would you mind trying to rename the image to that name manually, as in not using the script? It might be trying to throw an error specific to that image but it's using a generic error "hookaborted" in place of an appropriate one that may not exist.  If it succeeds without error then you can move it back to the original name.  Let me know how it goes please!  — Foodbandlt (talk) 16:40, September 29, 2014 (UTC)

Evilryu34
Evilryu34 is engaging in an edit war with yours truly on Karin's page. This person is quite insisting of this piece of trivia being accepted into the article, despite my efforts to inform them that this is not how we roll. Would you be so kind as to take some action? ~Hakinu (talk 16:10, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * Weird. Some people need to go out a little bit more. Anyway, you're welcome :D ~Hakinu Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk 16:44, September 29, 2014 (UTC)

Re: File blacklist warning
Try now.~Ultimate Supreme  19:01, September 30, 2014 (UTC)

Re:moving images
Hi, I only renamed one file as it was named incorrectly, but when I'm done with the tankobon scans, I will look at the script, thanks. It's just that I never had to deal with these command things and am still a bit clueless about them. :D Norleon (talk) 10:41, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * I can guess it sounds easy to you, but to me, it's a mystery. I will try it when I find another wrongly named image though. :) Norleon (talk) 12:10, October 1, 2014 (UTC)

user page violation
are you serious man? if you delete mine then go delete everyone else s that is similar. Most of the stuff on my profile is allowed. Munchvtec (talk) 13:03, October 1, 2014 (UTC)

thanks asshole. that was done on purpose. go delete other peoples profiles. Munchvtec (talk) 13:13, October 1, 2014 (UTC)

Re: threads
so its basically like censorship i understand its sad but i guess its needed by the way how is life in macedonia i never was there before im curiousWongo2 (talk) 16:24, October 1, 2014 (UTC)

thats cool so you are on vacation or work ther? lol at first i thought macedonia is near ukraine but thats moldova lolol i was worried because of war in ukraine but youre far away thats goodWongo2 (talk) 16:29, October 1, 2014 (UTC)

Regarding the user Haxs
He has already been warned multiple times by me and others and now you. he's also been blocked for three days because of his behavior so what should be done? Munchvtec (talk) 17:09, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * The comment of his I removed just adds to that. He behaves like 12 years old brat--Elve Talk Page 13:54, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * I am probably going to ask for a blockcheck for about a week or two, his behaviour is very disruptive in threads (not to mention the constant double/triple postings). --Sajuuk Talk Page 13:56, October 2, 2014 (UTC)

alright. Munchvtec (talk) 15:21, October 2, 2014 (UTC) So...will nothing be done? Munchvtec (talk) 12:49, October 3, 2014 (UTC)

forum topic history
Doesn't really work http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Board_Thread:Naruto_Discussions/@comment-Naruto9969-20140925215818/@comment-Haxs-20141002134826?curid=143336&action=history

When accessed from the topic itself, it shows it like this: http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:142175?action=history that's all fine and all, but it would be nice if the messages could be seen too. For example when we remove someone's comment, there's no way to check what the comment was once it's done, only one opportunity to undo the deletion.--Elve Talk Page 14:00, October 2, 2014 (UTC)

That's great, thanks. And I guess my multi-quoting proposition got ignored :P Apparently too much work to implement, or UltimateSupreme doesn't think it's necessary. Well, I think it is, because people are basically forced to doublepost sometime, only to then copy the latter message, merge it with previous and remove the doublepost (those that care, that's it). It's possible to quote multiple messages by writing it out manually, but who is supposed to remember it?--Elve Talk Page 14:10, October 2, 2014 (UTC)

re: quest
I would think one tag gives enough notice.

Unless you want a specific sysop to make a specific action, this sort of request is best placed at Sysop Requests. ~SnapperTo 17:09, October 2, 2014 (UTC)


 * You want a page that you are unable to edit to be edited. That qualifies as a protection-related request: "Is a sysop needed to modify a protected page?" ~SnapperTo 17:52, October 2, 2014 (UTC)


 * It's still a page you want a sysop to edit. So make a request of the sysops. ~SnapperTo 18:41, October 2, 2014 (UTC)


 * Just because I'm a sysop does not mean I need to do everything that is asked of me. I'm allowed to have opinions, you know. Which is why I suggested you use the Sysop Requests, so that you can find someone with an opinion different from my own. ~SnapperTo 18:53, October 2, 2014 (UTC)

Tabview Arc
How would you like to proceed with this tabview arc? What else do we need to do, and who must we receive permission from? Also, like I said before, I would be happy to do it if someone could briefly instruct me how to do it so I don't mess it up... Thanks! --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 17:30, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay- do you think either a new thread should be created or a new section in one of the arc's talk pages should be created to discuss the issue? After all, I don't think a lot of users are checking that one forum, and so they probably don't even know about this possible scenario. --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 22:48, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Bump --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 14:34, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * In which talkpage will you create a new section? --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 14:39, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay- in which talkpage? --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 14:53, October 5, 2014 (UTC)

Re: warning
i have literally Never seen anyone reply in that manner every time someone replies i see them replying to each post in separate posts never once seen them go 10 posts up to edit said post and add reply in said post.

also you said "I don't care what some dictionary says, our definition is to make multiple posts in a row with no other users in between the posts."

so based on that definition i only double posted ONCE in which i replied to post #164 and below that Post #162, so i do not understand why i got a warning for double posting for accidentally doing it Once Actionmanrandell (talk) 12:05, October 5, 2014 (UTC)