Talk:Summoning: Shuriken

How is this not part of Generic Sealing Technique? - S im A nt 05:25, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Laziness. Redirecting.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 19:56, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * No scroll was used, look again. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 00:07, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * doesn't have to be sealed in a scroll. - S im A nt 00:08, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Did not see you answer before I made the new page. When I tried that before it was deleted, and apparently because it was too vague. This is more specific, and is a tad different from the other stuff in that it is not an animal. Other objects get their own pages as with 'summonings may not be restricted to creatures, as Orochimaru shows by summoning corpses and defenses.' Thomas Finlayson (talk) 00:14, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Because those were named as jutsu, and those require either blood or sacrifice. Why would you instantly go create a new page? - S im A nt 00:21, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * The user is an advanced summoner (Talk: Jiraiya), he might need blood. Plus, the audience would not want to be distracted at such a high tense moment, it is only really noticable when you go through again. 66.183.47.220 (talk) 02:04, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * The page this was redirected to is an unnamed technique that includes this within it. - S im A nt 02:08, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Pardon? Thomas Finlayson (talk) 02:17, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Generic Sealing Technique is an unnamed technique that encompasses other unnamed tool summonings. - S im A nt 02:24, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, but what about the specific summons? Thomas Finlayson (talk) 05:04, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * And if it does not have to be in a scroll, than why is that page dedicated to putting them in seals? This had no seals. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 05:01, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * For all we know he has a seal under his skin, or in a place we couldn't see. - S im A nt 05:21, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, how is that a shuriken? - S im A nt 21:54, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * ...pardon? Thomas Finlayson (talk) 21:55, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * I may be a noob when it comes to japanese weapons, but that has 2 bladed sides, not four. - S im A nt 21:57, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * I can see "three," cirled around a ring. Moreover, since it can be thrown so readily it would be logical to make it balanced by having something on the fourth side. And what was that you had previously? Thomas Finlayson (talk) 22:03, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Smoke is obscuring it in this ... Could be a shuriken i guess. Why couldn't he have had the item sealed in his robes or even have a tattoo? - S im A nt 22:12, June 16, 2010 (UTC)