Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-3279282-20160423171719/@comment-3279282-20160430202428

Okay, so what's the consensus? Is there even one? I added the templates to some user's posts when they voiced their opinion, but didn't use the coresponding template. But since there are three proposals, it doesn't really make any sense to go by the votes.

From what I gathered, there isn't really much opposal to removing Japanese terms from articles when they don't belong there (proposal 2 & 3). Of course, this doesn't have to happen immediately, but it would be nice if you could remove unnecessary Japanese when you stumble upon it. Of course there are exceptions, but I trust your judgement as to when to remove it and when not to. Basically, if it doesn't serve any other purpose aside from just being there, remove it (ex. almost everywhere natural energy is mentioned). If it serves a purpose or the word is somehow important, leave it (ex. Mitsuki's name's origin).

Regarding the first proposal, I'm thinking of opening a new thread so ya'll can vote and we can see what we'll do with the intros.