User talk:TheUltimate3

Re: I feel soooo good about my life right now.
Lol, do you? (And I also did not expect those two to be blocked from my suggestion, wow). Btw, have you been watching Star Wars Rebels? :x (I haven't tbh, still hurt over SW: TCW being cancelled all those years ago...). Yoda and Anakin's designs in SWR look terrible (Anakin showed up in a hologram briefly, and I don't even want to know how Obi-Wan looks like...). I'm only interested in seeing Ahsoka versus Darth Vader. After that, I pretty much expect Darth Vader and the Empire to just slaughter everyone else fighting for the Rebels in that show (since none of them, save Leia so far, were present in the original trilogy or the canon comics). 06:32, February 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * Not too surprised you doubted that, since most shows don't end with the villains winning in the end. And maybe them being lost somewhere in space can happen too. Also, question: have you been reading the canon comics for Star Wars, at all? (such as "Skywalker Strikes", "Vader Down", "Obi-Wan & Anakin" etc?) 06:16, March 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * (I'm just gonna reuse this section) You watch the season 2 finale of Star Wars Rebels? Not gonna lie, I wrote off the show entirely because of SW: TCW being cancelled, but those last two episodes of Rebels were freaking GOOD (not sure if you've watched it yet, so I won't spoil the details). Also, on your user page, the banhammer image is broken. You may want to replace it. 22:13, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * Wow, then I'm glad I didn't spoil it for you then. So with WoW, I take it you haven't read the canon comics for Star Wars? (such as "Skywalker Strikes", "Vader Down", "Obi-Wan & Anakin" etc?) 18:37, April 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * "'Bleed whole worlds dry rebels. You will not keep me from the boy.'"
 * Lol, good I mostly (and heavily) read the Darth Vader comics too. And the recent Star Wars comics next to them I skim through a bit. Vader having the revelation that Luke was his son did give me the chills though, lol. There is also a link to them all on Imgur, if you'd like. 18:45, April 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Read the Darth Maul comic yet? :x 19:04, April 24, 2016 (UTC)
 * Lol. While I liked Episode 7 (have we ever talked about it before?), the only criticism I have towards it was that it was literally a reboot of the original Star Wars film (now known as Episode IV: A New Hope), in almost every way possible. The similarities and parallels are so blatantly obvious.
 * There's even the theory floating around that Rey is the reincarnation of the Chosen One (i.e. just like Anakin before her, she was also conceived by the Force itself and was a product of virgin birth). And then you have everyone freaking out over Kylo Ren. Speaking of films, can't wait to see Captain America: Civil War in the next couple weeks. :P
 * From what I know, Star Wars Rebels season 3 will premiere fall of this year. I just can't wait to see more Maul. Maul! Maul!! He was wasted in Episode I. I think reviving him was such a good move on George Lucas' part in Star Wars: The Clone Wars. 08:52, April 26, 2016 (UTC)

Excited about Rogue One too. I even read somewhere that they intend to "resurrect" the original actor of Tarkin in A New Hope with CGI. Wonder how that will work out. Is Rogue One before or after Star Wars Rebels, though? 18:59, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's Star Wars Day: May the 4th be with you. 16:26, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Sorry for not replying sooner, been drowning in studies...
 * "Also I really hope they don't try to Michael Jackson and Tupac Tarkin. Just get the guy who played him in Episode III. That guy was fine."
 * LOL, why? We didn't even hear the guy who played Tarkin in Episode III speak. Not sure if he would sound like Tarkin either, he just looked a lot like him (albeit younger). And I guess you still have some Star Wars comics (Darth Vader, Darth Maul) to catch up on, right?
 * Not much news on Rebels, but it seems Captain Rex will return in his Clone trooper armor. I'm just hellbent on seeing more Maul. Like the vast array of characters introduced in the prequel trilogy, Maul was very underdeveloped. Good to see more of him. Hoping to see another Obi-Wan vs Maul dual, TTYTT. 23:21, May 7, 2016 (UTC)

lol
The wiki is only ever about "canon vs non-canon" these days, but getting people to stop going on about it is nearly impossible, someone always brings up the topic again. Really think a whole policy needs to be made just to end the silly and near-persistent debates on canonicity, given how irrelevant it is to how the wiki records content. We didn't have this problem 3-4 years ago, yet it's everywhere in the past year. --Sajuuk 09:28, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

Naruto Wikia Greece
Hello.. As I can see you must be the ultimate Sysop of this wikia ... I started a greek-themed wikia about Naruto and I would like all the help I can get about slides, pages and main page editing.. If you, or someone else you know of, can help me, I would appreciate it...  SeraphAngel    18:27, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

About images in Hamura, Hagoromo and other articles
Hey. In the Talk Page of episode 462, I suggested that we could replace the images that shows Hagoromo and Hamura sealing Kaguya with image that is closer to manga, meaning, except with HD-quality, so if someone could do that... Also, this was my first time uploading image into wikia, so apologises, if there's some mistakes. --JouXIII (talk) 13:51, June 2, 2016 (UTC)

Sorry!
Gotcha!GodlyHades (talk) 00:19, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

DarioAD
Given that Dario sockpuppeted a block, could you extend his block on User:DarioAD for a few extra days? --Sajuuk 17:47, June 27, 2016 (UTC)

Hmmm
Me and Sajuuk are just having a civil disagreement. Nothing extreme, and nothing to concern you. Thank you very much. --Rai 水 (talk) 00:12, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

Ignore this forum spam
Please ignore this spam. I have reported it to VSTF, who will delete it entirely and block the user across the service. --Sajuuk 13:21, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

re: message
Why is the use of the Vandal notice template such a problem all of a sudden, when it's what this wiki has done for years? Are you going to tell Omnibender off for doing almost exactly the same thing with new users? The whole point of warning them is so that they don't get blocked. Up until recently, not a single user has complained about these templates or their use, so why is it suddenly a problem now?

And I find it funny how someone like Cerez, who has been here for a very long time, and has used the template himself (if I'm remembering right) now suddenly taking issue with the template's wording? If he had such an issue with the wording, then why didn't he bring it up before hand? Have you actually read the template, since it does clearly say that if the user continues the edits that got them the warning, they may be blocked, it doesn't mean they will. --Sajuuk 20:23, July 17, 2016 (UTC)
 * UltimateSupreme created the template back in 2012. If the template is, as some users are claiming, "too harsh", exactly why did nobody actually take the time back then to complain about it? Given that people are only complaining about it "right this minute", that tells me that the users who are complaining about the template don't actually "have" a problem with it, but are simply saying they do just to "fit the crowd".
 * Omnibender, for as long as I've been here, has always posted a warning of a similar nature to the vandal notice template. And he's been here for longer than any of us. Nobody has ever complained about him using such a message. So if we're going to call the vandal notice template "harsh", then we should inform Omnibender not to post the message he's been posting for years on this wiki to warn users not to continue making bad edits or risk a block, because according to someone, his message must be "too harsh" as well.
 * I see zero benefit in rewording the notice template. The most recent usage of it was by me for a legitimate case of page vandalism (moving the links for a specific poll on the character poll page to put certain characters as having more votes than they did is essentially vandalism/false information), so as is customary for anyone who vandalises, I give them a warning on their talkpage and if they ignore it, I call for their blocking. The notice covers this route perfectly: warn first, then if they continue the bad edits, call for a short block.
 * Unlike certain others, I don't see a single bad edit and just call for the user's instant blocking without bothering to warn them (doesn't apply to spambots or those uploading pornographic content). So the mere fact I'm warning users that they should desist the bad editing or risk a possible block from the wiki (which should be 3 days, not a week in the first instance) says a lot that I'm educating them about the wiki's policies.
 * It's like certain users don't seem to care about the wiki's blocking policy anymore. I wonder why we even have policies when they're always being ignored.
 * I know this is a long post, but I wanted to digress my opinion on this issue. I don't appreciate people coming to my talkpage and complaining about me doing something that has been a norm of the wiki for many years and which has never resulted in a complaint in the past, just simply for the sake of it.
 * I have no doubt in my mind that people are just going to start complaining about me having an opinion on something, simply for the sake of complaining... --Sajuuk 21:58, July 17, 2016 (UTC)
 * Fine Sajuuk. We get that no one until now has wanted to change the template, and sorry that you happened to be the one to be put out there for doing the "norm" (warn others when they break the rules). However, the problem isn't the fact that now someone wants to change the template, it shouldn't matter why now. Change is normal. What should've been done was it being brought up on a consensus thread. --Rai 水 (talk) 23:27, July 17, 2016 (UTC)