Talk:Itama Senju

Delete
what is wrong --68.100.51.104 (talk) 05:15, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * The chapter is already out in english Kunoichi-shi.--Yomiko-chan (talk) 05:18, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * nothing wrong, the new chapter 622 claims it to be correct
 * yeah I know people wanted it deleted for some reason --68.100.51.104 (talk) 05:33, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Is there enough information on this person for there to be an article ? All we know is that he's some son to the First and Second Hokage and died, we know nothing else and that is hardly noteworthy enough to be an article in it's own right. I vote for deletion of this article until we know more about them. --Speysider Talk Page 08:03, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Wait how can he be the son of the First and Second Hokage? That's all sorts of ickiness.

He's their brother. And considering how character pages have been written for MUCH less prominent characters, I say, keep. The S (talk) 08:19, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * There are plenty of both Canona and non-Canon characters who've not even been seen speaking, but simply act as background characters who we've given articles, yet this is the one to single out? He's more so important to the plot than any of those background characters.--Yomiko-chan (talk) 08:18, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Characters with names should automatically get articles. There's more than enough information to make a decent article out of this. Naturally it won't be an epistle, but there's absolutely no cause to delete thise.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 08:45, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Agreed on all counts with Cerez.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 09:42, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * I also concur. In fact, I've even already added trivia about his name -- it seems that the Senju all have names referring to the space between pairs of architectural elements (Hashirama - pillars, Tobirama - doors, Itama - slats, Kawarama - roof tiles). FF-Suzaku (talk) 09:59, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

Uncanny resemblence
Maybe worth a trivia mention to the uncanny resemblence with zetsu?--114.76.118.119 (talk) 11:05, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * No, not really.Norleon (talk) 12:43, February 27, 2013 (UTC)