Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4521917-20160607052814/@comment-4271790-20160607071717

Very strongly. Deliberately removing sections of an article simply because of this perceived notion of "canon" is an egregious idea. The purpose of a wiki is to document all aspects of a series. This idea goes completely against that by like, not documenting stuff.

We should not let "canon" dictate whether or not we document information. That has never been how this wiki has been run, nor should it be, especially since there isn't any statements from the author sanctioning an official canon, or even explicity using the word "canon" (at least, not to my knowledge). Even if there was, that shouldn't ever stop us from documenting the rest of the series. M4ND0N wrote: If I could direct you to the Sabo article on the One Piece wikia, specifically - in the "Episode of Sabo" section, you'll see just how bad showcasing a canon and non-canon version of a storyline beside each other can look in an article. So? We're not the OP wiki. We've had to deal with a databook that heavily contradicted the manga itself. We were able deal with it and accurately document information from both sources in articles, whether it be separate sections or using the trivia. This differences between the Boruto manga and the Boruto movie should be dealt with in a similar fashion. Not documenting information based on differences, contradictions, or some perceived notion of what is "canon" and what isn't is not a good idea by any stretch of the means.