Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-1251315-20141013163005/@comment-1251315-20141015103141

He doesn't do much content wise though, and a sysop needs to be a presence in both realms. I'm actually quite present in the mainspace and have made many edits to it over the years and I rollback bad edits at least every week, so just because I don't do many in recent days doesn't mean I'm not making edits in it (I recently standardised our disambiguation pages for example). "however after seeing his actions in TES wiki on a particular thread Snapper2 linked that thread without any idea as to what he was linking, nor did he know the actual reasons behind it's consensus, so I will enlighten everyone and ask that people do not consider it as valid against me as nobody here would know the real reasons surrounding it :)

The user who made the consensus against me on TES Wiki was a politically correct user who demanded that everyone follow the rules to the letter and not in the spirit that they were made. Any time that I corrected him for warning improperly, I was screencapped and it was used in a bogus consensus against me (he had been feuding with me for a few weeks before it ever happened), so that consensus is proof of nothing against me being a sysop here.

The behaviour in that thread was due to a consensus that was riddled in falsehood, privacy invasions and bias from the creator of the consensus. Therefore, I had every right to defend myself against people who supported false evidence, privacy invasions and clear bias against me.