Talk:Crushing Rage: Rasengan

Duplicate
I don't even know how this went unmissed for circa. 2 years, but this is definitely not an anime/manga technique. This is just Naruto using a Rasengan like he always does, so how is a technique used in the game being equated to a generic Rasengan in the main series? --SuperSajuuk (talk) 21:41, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * If this get deleted (which it should), I'd at least suggest putting the name of this technique in the Rasengan article's infobox in the game names section? 21:49, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * Agree with that, it's just a variant name for essentially a generic technique that Naruto uses freely in the series but which the game developers like to suggest is a "new technique". --SuperSajuuk (talk) 21:52, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

Something that is wrong about this article, this jutsu is something Sage Naruto used in UNSG, so it's currently wrong. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:15, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * Well you're the video game expert. So it's supposed to have Sage Mode added and has been wrong like that for 2 years? Aye. 22:19, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * Just noting that if you look at History, you would see that for it's been wrong since February 9. It's seems 4th Six Paths thought that this and Naruto's regular Rasengan against Deidara were same. --JouXIII (talk) 22:33, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * I did look at the history (hence how I got the link). I linked it to there specifically and not February 8th because of the whole Sage Mode thing Omni is referring to (and how Sage Mode was not there in the first place, strangely enough). 22:38, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * Apparentlty it used while in Sage Mode, but if we agree that it is not a significant method or variation then we should leave the page as a game only technique and insert Sage Mode in instead of deleting the whole thing. --Rai 水 (talk) 17:14, April 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Since we got rid of pages like "Sage Art: Big Ball Rasengan" in the past (which were actually named in the manga, unlike this one), it only seems appropriate if we delete this one as well.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 17:57, April 2, 2016 (UTC)