Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1207741-20160215005734/@comment-1207741-20160221092750

Munchvtec wrote: @Snapper: why should he have to add information that you yourself removed? @shrek has every right to be upset that you removed that info from hinata's article, don't tell him he should add it back. But that's how editing works. One person makes an edit. Another person edits that edit. The first person edits the other person's edit of their original edit. If the two people have the back-and-forth for long enough, they will eventually arrive at a revision that both are happy with. I can't know what edits other people would like to have made if they don't actually make the edits.

About the One Piece wikia comment, we are an Encyclopedia. We record EVERYTHING. If someone chooses to view this wikia instead of the manga or anime then we should be honoured. No we shouldn't. If the wiki ever becomes a replacement for the series itself, Shueisha and Viz and whoever else are within their rights to have the entire wiki taken down. Is that what you want? To go from "less informative" articles to no articles at all?

You say sysop isn't a status yet it very much is and you play as though it isn't. Please find an example of me invoking sysop "status" for anything. Because other people bring up me being a sysop way more often than I do.