User talk:Iruka-dono

Hello Iruka-dono, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Talk:Naruto Shippūden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Generations page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Simant (Talk) 14:04, February 27, 2012

Re: Naruto Shippūden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Generations page
The page is protected only to unregistered edits. Any logged in user is supposed to be able to edit the page. Maybe it's because your account is still new or something. There's this "autoconfirmed" thing that clears you as a registered user. I think it's either a quantity of edits, or maybe having an email confirmed. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:41, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Valley of The End Edit
Regardless, the picture is unnecessary. Skitts (talk) 15:14, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * It doesn't really add anything. We already have a picture of it being destroyed and what the valley looks afterward (the present-day valley). Skitts (talk) 16:00, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Hi Darkusgal231 16:41, February 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * It also isn't actually canon. To animators perhaps, but unless it is also canon to Kishimoto, I think we came to the agreement here that we don't consider it canon. Skitts (talk) 16:43, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * I pointed you to the discussion in which multiple people, not just I, agreed that until we see a statement that says Kishimoto also considers it canon, we won't. It has less to do with personal opinion than the fact that it comes from the lowest tier of canonicity, the video games. Skitts (talk) 16:57, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Valley of the End
Elaborated actually means "to develop or present in detail" or " to add more detail concerning what has already been said/shown", which given that certain parts of the battle had already been shown, seems more appropriate to use in this instance.

Also, although Kurama's Tailed Beast Ball didn't result in a complete collapse, it did cause a trench to be formed between the lowered area in which the battle took place and a large area of water located some distance away, which together came to be referred to as the Valley of the End (at least according to this version). Blackstar1 (talk) 23:49, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Susanoo
Ah, I had forgotten about this message.

Firstly, it's not "better" than "Madara's Susanoo Full Body.png" especially since that image is basically redundant. You can't see the ribcage except for a few lines and a giant hand. Whether or not it stays there, it's not of any real interest to me.--Cerez365™ 16:15, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * What Cerez said, especially when we compare to the other images of the ribcage. --Gojita (talk) 17:57, February 29, 2012 (UTC)Gojita

Like I said before, it's neither here nor there with me. Taking this up on Susanoo's talk page would be much better suited at this point.--Cerez365™ 18:01, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Dragon fire... whatever
keep it to the relevant articles talk page instead of posting directly on the individual users talk pages, this way others can more easily participate in the discussion as well, so go ask there and i will answer you. --Gojita (talk) 18:04, March 1, 2012 (UTC)Gojita
 * Talk page as in this Talk page as there is a talk page related to every sinle blody article on this wikia like there is on every other wikia and wikipedia. Have you not seen the tap where it says Talk above the right side of each article??? --Gojita (talk) 18:34, March 1, 2012 (UTC)Gojita
 * Besides, on the talk page related to this technique as you have been pointed out to you before, it has already been discussed why any kind ilustration is not used. Please read that too. --Gojita (talk) 18:36, March 1, 2012 (UTC)Gojita
 * Even if it only concerns a single person the basic idea is to still keep the discussion on the articles talk pages instead of the personal ones because others might like to join in on them, and when there seem to be an open discussion then no matter how old it is, one keeps to that instead of just starting at random in the edit summary and the UNSG issue is still under discussion which means that until then neither images nor information are added to the articles, and besides, i don't really mind adding an image of the valleys destruction, but that particular image is cropped like hell, is it not even from after the fight was completly finished and i believe that the use of slideshows makes the articles look horrible. This is my final say on our personal talk pages, if you have any more arguments about the different issues, keep it to the talk pages of the relevant articles so others are also given a chance at their opinion, a community does not just consist of two people you now. --Gojita (talk) 19:01, March 1, 2012 (UTC)Gojita

No matter what kind of tone I or anyone else use, I would kindly ask you to please refrain from using insulting remarks. I only stubornly direct you away from the personal talk pages because i don't believe that is what they are for.--Gojita (talk) 20:22, March 1, 2012 (UTC)Gojita

hey Darkusgal231 16:33, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

hi

Hideout images
Heller~ Could you crop out the watermark from your two recent uploads please, they breach the wikia's image policy. Just go to the file page scroll down to the bottom and click the link that says "upload a new version of this file" and overwrite the image (I'm assuming you might not know how to do it).--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 17:15, May 10, 2012 (UTC)


 * If you aren't able to crop out the watermarks, you can always ask someone here to upload the same image without them. --Speysider (Talk Page) 17:21, May 10, 2012 (UTC)

No problem. Could you also get the one from chapter 584 and where Suigetsu was being held please.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 17:49, May 10, 2012 (UTC)

The watermark is still there --S@lil (T@lk) 17:51, May 10, 2012 (UTC)


 * You haven't changed anything at all, the watermark still exists. --Speysider (Talk Page) 17:52, May 10, 2012 (UTC)