Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1018594-20150708054235/@comment-28861328-20150709044354

And I would reiterate, again, as Cerez was just saying:

If a sysop is perceived, by the community, to be abusing his/her powers, then the course of action is going to be the same as Sajuuk regardless of "evaluation" threads. The mod him/herself need to be addressed. If improvements are not made, then another mod needs to be informed, and if even that does not yield results, Dantman can step in as he did in the most recent case.

The reason sysops don't need a grade card, which is basically what an eval-thread is, is because Sysops are not "holding power". We literally got our tools to help assist the wiki at a functional level. We're not politicians, we're not a pantheon of gods; we're ordinary users, like everyone else.

What Cerez, and many of the concerned users, are stating is that opening up a thread once or twice a month (or whatever dates are set) are just a set up for more drama. Though Rachin, you mention that you, personally, don't see it as a medium to address disagreements with said user, others might not feel as you do. If this wiki is really open to a huge dramafest every month or so, then, by all means, open up evaluation threads periodically.

Personally, though, I think the current method worked well. A large sum of users had a problem with a Forum Mod; they addressed the issue with not one, not two, but three or more sysops. When even the sysops could not get a handle on said-problem-Forum Mod, Dantman himself said he had a large number of users approached him with the issue and he acted.

NeedleJizo, I respect your suggestion, so I don't want you to think I'm discounting you. This suggestion was a very thoughtful one. But, as the saying goes, 'don't fix what isn't broken'. The system has worked fine and, until it is proven not to, I think it should remain.