Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-1251315-20141013163204/@comment-25227224-20141203014609

SuperSajuuk wrote: New World God, your posts in this thread are antagonistic and defensive of your opinion. Considering that you have been here for very little time and the fact that the candidate in question gave you warnings via your talkpage for policy violations, I am more inclined to believe that your vote is based on your dislike for the warnings you received and the candidate in question, rather than actual reasoning, not to mention the fact you seem to believe that WindStar7125 is being discussed for a promotion to sysop.

First; I didn't ask you for your subjective conjecture. I told you all I had to tell you about my decision. If you're too thick-headed to not read my statements, and neglect your reason; that's not my problem.

In my Defense :

I'm being defensive for the simple fact that a majority of your 'pals' antagonized me, as well as yourself. No need to drop me your projection - or place a double-standard. I'm sure you're not being accused of conspiracy theories, subjective conjecture on your vote. I didn't question your vote. If the vote matters - respect it. I gave my reasons if you don't respect them. Don't.

Frankly; I don't want to continue this conversation on here. So stick to the topic - or post your "opinions" on my talkpage. There is no need for this on a mute issue that has been dead & settled.

But thanks for the 'slap on wrist' to those who share your same antagonism. Shows your own biases. Over the disagreement of your assumption. Even though I clearly gave reasons. But if you want to appeal to ignoratio elenchi. And straw-man my position, go ahead! Just don't highlight this and don't ask the community to vote on these issues. Because this isn't an echo chamber, sir.

Not everyone is going to have your opinion

And on the "Sysop comment" it was a typo. I got to memo when you stated that from the beginning. No need to pulse the processed statement. You're welcome.