User talk:North1nj

Welcome
Hello, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Itachi Uchiha page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.


 * Here are several other pages that can help you with where to begin-


 * Wiki Activity – A great first stop, because you can see what pages other people have been editing, and where you can help out.


 * Help Pages - If you're new to editing or having trouble getting something to work, the help pages are a great place to start.


 * Forums - The forums are used for a number of things, from proposing policy changes to general wiki discussions. Please use Naruto Answers for asking general questions.


 * Administrators - A list of 's administrators. If you need additional assistance or are having troubles, feel free to contact an administrator with the details.


 * Special:Upload - A page that provides you a form for uploading images easily.

Always sign in before you edit – This is so that we can recognize you!

Always sign your posts - When leaving a message on someone's talk page, remember to sign it by clicking either the 'signature' button or by typing four tildes ( ). This is so the person knows who to reply to.

There's a lot to do around here, so we hope you'll stay with us and make many more contributions. And again, welcome to. Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Seelentau (talk) 03:09, July 25, 2020 (UTC)

RE: Edit revisions
The information is irrelevant and serves little to no purpose regarding 'Kamui'. If it was relevant, it would have been there a long time ago. Based off your reasoning of putting it there, then virtually every other technique would need the same trivia information. Ventillate (talk) 16:34, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Beyond what Ventillate said, the jutsu was already widely known as Kamui before because it was revealed in the third databook, which was published four years before that chapter. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

I really wish that made any sense. “If it was relevant, it would have been there a long time ago. Based off your reasoning of putting it there, then virtually every other technique would need the same trivia information.” So because someone didn’t put it there before, that automatically means it isn’t relevant? No? Under YOUR logic, there wouldn’t be any point in allowing any future edits unless the information is new because “it would have been there a long time ago.” Omnibender’s explanation makes sense to me now so I’m going to let it go but I’m trying to figure out again is this a unilateral decision? Are you the only person that can decide what appears on the Kamui page? If so, why be difficult about what can appear there? It isn’t irrelevant... it displays an inconsistency in the show that’s worth noting. However, Not to YOU apparently. That’s why I’m asking if it’s just you that gets to decide.

ALSO, the data book saying the technique is called Kamui does not explain why Kakashi nor Obito never referred to it as such until chapter 595.. Y’all are explaining how the information is irrelevant. Y’all are just being stingy
 * Kakashi and Obito not referring to the jutsu by name isn't noteworthy. There are several jutsu that are never called by name in the manga, and are only named in databooks. Or jutsu that are only named a long time after being introduced, like Kotoamatsukami. This doesn't require an explanation, it just is. Also, please observe comment order in talk pages, new replies go at the bottom of the conversation. Also also, remember to sign your comments, just put four tildes ~ at the end of your message. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

okay so now there’s something wrong with the edit I made on that episode ... what? You said “not specific to the episode, as you yourself noted, properly worded in chapter article”

first of all it’s NOT properly worded or phrased in the chapter. Both the chapter and the episode have the same inconsistency. I don’t understand how y’all can be so petty with these edits. That’s clear trivia North1nj (talk) 05:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

re: village in distress episode & corresponding chapter inconsistency
What I meant by the inconsistency not being specific the episode is that this wasn't something that was changed by the episode. You tend to edit information in articles based on what happens in episodes. Episodes are the adaptation of the manga, so how things happen in the manga always come first. The supposed inconsistency you added to the episode isn't an inconsistency because it happened the same way in the manga, it wasn't something that was changed by the anime. Pointing out the real reason why the summoning failed as a trivia is like pointing out Itachi's real motivation for killing the Uchiha when he's introduced, or mentioning that Obito survived and was taken in by Madara right when he's crushed, or that he was Tobi right when he first showed up. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 18:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * And once again, new topics in talk pages go at the bottom. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 18:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

its inconsistent to the PLOT of the show sir... the fact that it happened in both the anime AND manga shows that it’s a PLOT inconsistency. The writers of the show changed the reason why the 4th hokage didn’t get reanimated. That’s what I was pointing out. That’s why I tagged the chapter that it also happened in. Because it’s something that’s inconsistent to the overall plot. North1nj (talk) 18:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * And that is as much an inconsistency as as the other reveals. Hiruzen and Orochimaru thought it was one reason, but then it turned out to be another. Or do you want to add the ninshu explanation of chakra to the early chapters and episodes as well, because that's a much greater inconsistency. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

It’s not though? Sending the plot backwards and explaining the real motivations for why Itachi did what he did or how chakra came to be are not plot inconsistencies. They explained in the show why Itachi lied. They built and explained the “inconsistency” into the actual storyline. They never said Orochimaru or Hiruzen “thought” anything. They both explicitly said that fourth wasn’t reanimated bc of Hiruzen and then the show gave a different reason for why he didn’t reanimate and never explained why Hiruzen thought what he thought. Lol what makes it more inconsistent is the fact that Hiruzen was LOOKING at Minato when he performed the Reaper Death Seal (episode: Thank You). Something else they showed when they went back in time to when the Nine tails attacked the village. North1nj (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

No. First, you keep saying the show gave a different reason. Manga and anime did the same thing, so there's no difference between them. At least this is what I'm understanding you're arguing when you say "the show". Only difference between them is that in the anime, the kanji for "four" is visible in the coffin that doesn't work. Noting things in both the chapter and anime article is also redundant, specially when thing to be noted isn't a difference between them. Orochimaru and Hiruzen took what happened at face value and assigned an explanation to that, that the audience took at face value because the characters did. When Orochimaru resurrects them during the war, he did research the Uzumaki sealing jutsu, so now he knows better (he had no idea what the seal was during the fight), which is the entire point of going to acquire the mask, so he can resurrect the Hokage proper this time after releasing their souls. Whatever explanation or retcon or whatever you want to call it, saying that the chapter and episode were written to make the audience believe x or y is wrong because it implies prior knowledge of the future reason it didn't work and misdirected the audience. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)