User talk:SuperSajuuk

Notice: The talkpage will be archived when needed.

Re: Block
I tried a warning. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 09:19, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 16:59, February 4, 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 08:48, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

I hope you have noticed the comments about the user, both on his and yours talkpage. I placed the ball in his corner, so let's see what happens. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 18:53, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 08:16, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

Have you solved the problem? Jacce | Talk | Contributions 20:09, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

I'm on it. I think I can handle it from here. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:16, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 18:39, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 10:39, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 13:43, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Solved. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 14:34, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:21, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

Solved. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 10:41, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

The Narutopedia:Talkpage policy states: ''The Talk page does not belong to the user, it belongs to the community. Users are not allowed to do other actions that hinder users' abilities to send messages to you. The point of archive is to clean up old messages, you may only archive resolved discussions''. Whether or not Kunoichi101 is getting block is not my decision, but the Admins. Though since she has been warn numerous of time, it's most likely she will. White Flash 19:23, May 2, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Delete
Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:07, May 13, 2012 (UTC)

Deleted. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:34, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Re: File:Pein Rikudō.png
There isn't but it's more a case of logic. There is no logical reason to link the page in it's Japanese name if the page isn't also in it's Japanese name. It just comes off to me as a dumb thing to do for little to no reason.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 12:00, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Like I said, it comes off to me as dumb. My opinion. Plus it has always been a problem for me, I'm just hella lazy and haven't actually done anything about it until now.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 12:03, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * I've already told you. The only reason I haven't done them before is because I'm too lazy/busy to make the conscience effort to do it. If I happen to come across it however, I will make the edits. They are pointless redirects or renaming. I will edit them as I see them.
 * Also, you have an unusual attachment to your edits. You need to grow out of that. Such is the way of the Wikiverse. Your edits are not your own. They are free game for everyone.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 21:39, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Titans here we go.
 * It is pointless because the articles are not named as such. The article we are currently fighting over is named, at the top of the page "Summoning: Impure World Reincarnation", not Edo Tensei. Using a redirect is first misleading, and second unnecessary.
 * And I honestly don't care if you're going to get butt hurt over this. I also don't care if you feel threatened or whatever "woe is me" your comment was filled with on my Talk Page. If I see the redirects, I will make the corrections. I don't care who uploads it. If I see it, I will edit it. The world doesn't revolve around you. You just made yourself a unfortunate target with your love of uploads so more likely than not, any image I stumble across will be, surprise surprise, yours.
 * Summoning: Impure World Reincarnation. Edo Tensei. Just so this gets drilled in one more time, which one of these ends up as a redirect? The one that does is not the one to be used.--21:52, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * And to cover my ass, the current picture we are fighting over, the Sasori one, I stumbled across it on complete accident when I happened on Sasori's page, and thought for a moment that that picture was his manga image. You weren't targeted. I wasn't digging through the uploads trying to find your upload. I stumbled on that by accident, and I made a correction edit.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 21:55, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

You are a young editor, so I can forgive you for being ignorant of such things. But this wiki has long had a Naming Policy, it may not be written because goddamn do I miss the days where people wouldn't make mountains out of molehills, where naming of things went like this:
 * Characters use Western Order
 * Techniques are translated literally, with the exception of kekkei genkais, and special cases (Rasengan, the Deva Path's abilities), which is still technically open for discussion but currently is as stated.
 * Villages untranslated, (Konohagakure, ect), other locations translated (Valley of the End, Great Naruto Bridge, ect)

The explanation for the technique naming is simple: Having them in Japanese directly alienates people who do not watch/read Naruto in Japanese and thus comes off as strange and confusing. We didn't translate them to official English because names would then change depending on location. Direct Translation solves this on two fronts: Stays faithful to Kishimoto's names and allows for easier editing for English speaking users. (And a reminder: English Language wiki. Sorry if you speak another language but /shrug)

"But TheUltimate3", you will most likely say because I expect no less from you, "if that's true you should add it to the Naming Policy!" And you are correct, and I'm in the process of clarifying that now. I'm sure I've said this before, before you showed up, most of our policies and culture has been discussed, declared, and used without much formalities and goddamn do I miss those days. I would thank you for giving us a reason to do our jobs right, but I expect you will use that as validation to cause me even more stress with whatever antics catch your fancy in the future.


 * Then by all means, be wrong. I don't care. Wave your banner in clear defiance! Embrace the Heresy! But don't come to me when I notice something and make an edit. I will not back down because I do something you don't like. That's not how the world works. Getting pissy doesn't mean your edits golden nuggets that are free from being altered. It's about time you stop acting like a child and accept that.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 22:35, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

Speysider, no-one has come up to you and ordered you to stop uploading images with specific text or threatened to ban you.

Image pages, just like articles are used and looked at by other people. When you upload an image you have no rights over what happens with the image and the image page afterwords. Image pages have the same level of ownership to the author as articles... none. Frankly, since they're just copied images rather than original text you've got even less rights over them.

We aren't currently enforcing any naming policy over images, that's why no-one has threatened to block you if you keep uploading images with romaji instead of the names we use in the naming policy.

So when someone comes along and just edits the image page to clean it up and make the links conform to our naming policy for whatever reason. Since it follows a policy we're enforcing elsewhere, improves the consistency of the wiki whether we are enforcing consistency or not, and you have no ownership over the page. You have no right to object to people going and cleaning up image pages to fit the naming policy.

Frankly you're the one throwing personal opinions into this. We have a naming policy that was based on a consensus formed by ages of discussion between dozens of contributors to the wiki. And then you go and decide to use something different than what the agreement for the wiki was just because we're not actively enforcing that policy on image pages. Favouring personal opinion over related consensus just because you can and then making a fuss about it, that is being disruptive.
 * ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 05:55, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Thanks again :D
No problem, mate :D akz!  12:25, August 2, 2012 (UTC)

Signature policy
Hi. Which specific restriction in the Signature Policy is in question?


 * My username is in the signature
 * It should link back to my userpage (albeit blank) and talkpage.
 * I'm using only 1 colour unless you count the blankpage hyperlink colour and blue talkpage colour in which case I'm still using less than 2 colours.
 * I have no pictures.
 * Timestamp is default and automatic I think.
 * I haven't used any Magic words.
 * No line breaks.
 * No nested super or subscripts; only consecutive like yours. I believe this policy is to avoid having users changing the page structure drastically such as having a long staircase pushing other user posts downwards. (It's not my intention to cause such a disruption.)
 * No background or border colours.

Thanks for taking an interest in my signature and I'm willing to correct any valid faults that may arise.

Ageci (talk) 13:14, August 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * My signature directly quoted is this: Ageci (talk).
 * Pay particular attention that there are no nested levels unlike this violation: normal levelsup level 1 sup level 2 (nested)
 * My signature only includes this: sup level 1normal levelsub level 1.
 * Nested is the key word in the policy. What this means is that you cannot have sup within a sup to create sup/sub levels greater than one. Each sup/sub tag is immediately closed before a new sup/sub tag is opened. As I have shown you, I do not have anything nested; only consecutive (one after another) ie 1 sup then normal then sub. To give an example, this is as normal as writing: H2O2.
 * My reference to your signature is that an inefficient person might write ABundefinedC which would visually be the same as AB. In the first case, multiple consecutive sup tags are used but it is still valid and not nested as per the policy. I hope I'm not too provocative in my explanation. My intention is only to clarify the difference between nested and consecutive nothing more.


 * If you're still interested, feel free to test out my wiki code to verify I am correct in a preview. As I have explained above, this nesting policy is to avoid people altering the visual structure of multiple posts to push other posts further down with many sup/sub nested levels. Now if you wish to modify the policy to prevent consecutive or multiple sup and sub uses then I will comply and amend it in line with the new policy change. Thank you again for your interest.
 * Ageci (talk) 14:06, August 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * It's ok! At least I have explained it already so for future reference I can copy paste what I've written for any other eager users.
 * Ageci (talk) 14:17, August 2, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Repeated violations of Talkpage policy
Don't worry, I read them --Aeonophic (talk) 13:39, August 2, 2012 (UTC)Aeonophic


 * Yes, I already did that, I told u I saw what happened. Thank you for heads up --Aeonophic (talk) 13:41, August 2, 2012 (UTC)Aeonophic

Animation error
WHOA, i kno what an animation error is, but u did'nt have to say it like THAT. All I did was ask why there was a difference in color, lol. --Aeonophic (talk) 15:46, August 2, 2012 (UTC)Aeonophic

Lol, I meant that I didnt know why there were 2 colors. That dosent mean i did'nt known about animation errors, lol. I just never thought animation errors were the problem.--Aeonophic (talk) 15:56, August 2, 2012 (UTC)Aeonophic

Re:Images
I don't have any intent of paying them....But you know 480p/720p/1080p quality anime torrent is available for download just 10 mins after it's release on crunchyroll...So, I download 'em for free. No spending of valuable money :P xD akz!  16:45, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Na, I'm not that lucky...My monitor's res is 1368x768 :P Well, it's enough for me at least ^_^ akz! ANBU Symbol.svg 16:50, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1080p is lot better...you can see every hair, every blade of grass...I mean it's awesome...720p is not that good but usable though... akz! ANBU Symbol.svg 16:55, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's definitely making the wikia better..But all people may not have 1080p privileges..So, I don't think there should be any hard and fast rule about uploading the images or replacing the images with 1080p images....If someone can upload an image in 1080p, it's awesome for them and for the wikia :D akz! ANBU Symbol.svg 17:00, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Good :D Well, is there anyone else capable of uploading 1080p images..?? akz! ANBU Symbol.svg 17:05, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * hm...Even I thought that...Well, it's good for you... akz! ANBU Symbol.svg 17:11, August 2, 2012 (UTC)

Chidori
Okay--Aeonophic (talk) 16:19, August 3, 2012 (UTC)Aeonophic

It did'nt trouble you, however
It did'nt trouble you, however.I respond t a lot of things.--Aeonophic (talk) 16:25, August 3, 2012 (UTC)Aeonophic

User Groups
Thanks for the suggestion. I did send Wikia a message, but it says I am an autoconfirmed user on their site, but not on this wikia, so I don't know if they are able to do anything about that considering this is specifically a Narutopedia matter, but hopefully they can figure it out. --Uchiha Suraku (talk) 23:20, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

umm
what did i do i dont even edit here only my profile

Block
Block Kyuubi12345, hes posting constant yaoi in the pages and ignoring your warnings. its clear vandalism. --DC2 (U in mah territory, bitch...! • Contribs ) 23:39, August 4, 2012 (UTC)Davidchola2


 * lol, didnt even notice. sry, but im relieved to see someone act.

Re: Image policy
Sorry but i didnt understand your point but i kind of know what you are refering too i m not the one who posted those dirty picture the only picture i posted was of 4th fourth hokage and rikudou sennin.just that and if is for other reasons a truly sorry

Sorry
Sorry, I hope I ddin't get you mad or anything. It was just a suggestion. Btw, may I ask why she (I hope Yomiko's a she) is forbidden from making an account? If I'm allowed to hear about it.--Black Ronin8 (talk) 13:51, August 5, 2012 (UTC)Black Ronin8

Oh sweet! I'm Yin btw. And really? Wow, that's not fair at all.--Black Ronin8 (talk) 14:03, August 5, 2012 (UTC)

Kurama image
Maybe, but I don't think it really looks bad. KazeKitsune (talk) 11:30, August 8, 2012 (UTC)