Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20150609103822/@comment-25626003-20150609191525

Most of the people who are opposing like mad people haven't given one legitimate reason. Responses like the above "this is ridicuous", or "it hasn't hurt anyone" aren't legitimate and quite frankly shouldn't be considered at all. Anyway, my opinion (don't shoot), if you're inactive and haven't shown any signs of coming back, why should he/she still those rights? Especially if the additions are made based on need? I just don't get it. If Dan could explain that one to me, I'd appreciate it.