Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-38812954-20190831032416/@comment-38812954-20190919152457

"No, your experience has no weight in a debate, facts do. Empathy has no reason to be here either."

This is a totally different subject dude off of our debate. Lol and seriously? After saying this, "How exactly am I a "facts machine"? I'm not creating facts. I show you evidence from the Manga and tell you how I drew my conclusions. I'm not creating facts."

"Empathy is the ability to understand someone else's feelings. Your feelings don't hold weight in a debate."

I understood your juubito point. You don't accept at all, any of my theories with amaterasu. How change in form worsens its effects. My examples and research.

"Factual thinkers are short sighted? Lol alright, if you say so. And now I'm selfish too. Hm, it seems like this paragraph was made to insult me, but it's okay. I'm not so emotional that it'll hurt me."

Nah bruh. I have nothing against you. Tbh. I just have a lot of experiences of being overly criticized. My hate is directed at that. Factual thinkers are assholes man (not particularly you) and short sighted in terms of judging. Not achieving goals or anything like that.

"Facts are not surface level, so they're not superficial. Facts just are. Facts are what's true, whether it be a deep truth or a shallow truth. Imagination is very important; I'm an artist and it's very valuable. But your original point of the discussion, attempting to call out a plot hole, is not something rooted in just imagination. It's you thinking that something else should have happened there based on the series. So of course, when the facts are against you, people will tell you."

And most times what they consider "facts" aren't even facts, just their lousy, downright nonsensical, poorly conceived, lacking accuracy and depth for the matter, opinion.

"Factual thinkers lack depth and understanding? That's like saying a doctor lacks depth and understanding in the medical field because they only have think of the facts."

And you are thinking about it professionally, I mean it on like a social or interpersonal level. They're just too judgemental and are assholes. Blackholes as I like to call them. And doctors would apply my concept. Facts are supplementers to their imagination, deep thought or considerateness.

"Empathy doesn't mean "deep thinker" or "less opinionated." You realize empathy is actually more base in opinion? It's right-brained, it's subjective. Subjectivity, opinion, and empathy all fall under the same right-brained style of thinking. That's not to say the right-brain isn't important or less important than any others; I actually use more of my right brain than left (based on tests I had to do for class and job interviews). But opinions will always hold less value than facts in a debate."

If you can see both sides of a story, that is deep thinking and empathy my friend.

"I'm superficial in terms of Amaterasu? Bold claim. But you're giving it abilities (Sasuke, rather) that it doesn't have. Seems kinda surface-level to me."

And you thinking that is surface level. You're neglecting all my points, arguments and research. The biggest one being the fact that sasuke is/has the other half of Hagoromo's chakra. And change in chakra form. I considered your points. Him buffing up his Chakra and what not. Reason why I said only a hind leg and the stomach portion would be left etc. But you neglect all my points and still believe that amaterasu can't be used like that.

"You claim Naruto won't have time to buff his defense but again, you have nothing to go off of. No evidence that the best sensor in the world won't notice Sasuke is coalescing the majority of his chakra into a massive technique."

My evidence is obviousness. If it's large scale and wide spread even with his sensing abilities how would he dodge it? This is not madara's light fang. And if he just blocks it as you say this would occur, "And as I admitted. Only the stomach portion (below the breasts) and a single hind leg would be left."

"Even if Sasuke used all his chakra to try to burn through Naruto's, Naruto would be the one with chakra left to spare."

He will not be using all his chakra. The attack would be similar to 4tails cloak tailed beast laser bomb (or what ever. It looked like a laser when it was shot out) vs Orochimaru's (hashirama's really) 5 layer rashomon. Brief put powerful. Mainly referring to the effect the bomb had, as it hit the rashomon.

"Obito with Kamui."

Imagine if Obito didn't have kamui. And apply my research to that scene.

"Cripple Nagato with Deva Path."

This is my evidence. And so what if he's crippled and mindless? He'd be just like Obito if he didn't have kamui. Without his absorption technique he'd eventually be disintegrated.

"Ten Tails with its shedding ability (this one being empowered with a very high calibre Wind Release)." 'Only evidence' indeed.

That shit got disintegrated and you know it. I'm pretty sure that shed flesh was eventually burned. Just like naruto's shed cloak.

"How sure are you that Sasuke can summon the Gedo satue? Currently the Gedo statue is in an alternate dimension sealed up with Kaguya. Even transferring the Kage through to one of Kaguya's dimensions is taxing for Sasuke. How certain are you that he can summon such a massive force through dimensions?"


 * "IMAGINEEEE"* if it did happen, and this is the short sight in terms of judging I'm talking about, sadly you unconsciously displayed it. Because you are seriously making it sound as though if it did happen it would be problems for Naruto. I understand what you are saying, but just imagine so we could debate further. Cause remember I have to prove to you that their are ways that sasuke can beat Naruto. And taxing enough for him to be able to fight like that after?