Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-34656247-20180531072459/@comment-33308438-20180614223748

I don't really understand, what's so hard to understand in relation to my argument. I'm simply, correcting a part of your logic, implying the author's statement is not mirrored by a certain character he created, and he himself given the dialogue to. It's probable in being incorrect, than it being probable in being correct, likely. That's all there is to it, likely.