Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-25139119-20140915033602/@comment-4271790-20140919033122

Blaezej wrote: WindStar7125 wrote: Blaezej wrote: Why does Kishimoto have to spell everything out for you to get it?

Ten Tailed Fox gave you a summed up, though perfect, explanation. You still seriously do not understand it? I mean, c'mon! Since Ten Tailed Fox explained it so thoroughly according to you, @Blaezej, based on what he said, explain to me what is the Six Paths Power. Seriously? I don't have the patience. And since you didn't understand his version, I'm pretty sure I won't be able to make myself clear to you.

Not to use as an excuse, but rather an explanation, this isn't my main language, and either way, I couldn't be bothered to make a long post.

So no, HagoromoOtsutsuki, you don't need to go get your popcorn. Unless you really fancy eating some right now. :P Exactly my point. You won't bother to explain because, like @Tau said multiple times before, no one knows the full capabilities of the Six Paths Power. Until someone does, there is no "perfect explanation." @HagoromoOtsutsuki, get some popcorn and a soda for this. @Blaezej, whether this is your main language or not, I'll make this clear to you: why don't you actually contribute to the wiki more, rather than get on my case in the forums just because I have a question? Not everything can be rationalized. I got @Foxie's explanation, but not once did he fully explain all capabilities of the Six Paths Power, now did he? So until you or someone else can explain that to me and everyone else who is confused on this subject, work on improving the wiki rather than talk to me about "perfect explanations" on the forums. I don't know if you have noticed, but it is incredibly rude to accuse others of having "petty thinking" just because they are confused on a subject. This is a discussion, and debates happen. Sure, we "argue over every little thing," and eventually we reach a consensus, FYI. What are you doing to help this wiki? Not much at the moment. Just claiming others have "petty thinking" because we're confused on a subject. I take offense when someone singles me out for my opinion among others, but I'll take even more offense when a random editor who comes out of nowhere does things that don't help the wiki at all. As a relatively new editor with a very little amount of edits, instead of coming here and starting out with a know-it-all attitude (which I certainly have no patience for), I suggest you make yourself useful by helping the wiki. You, who hasn't even reached triple-digits in edits, are absolutely in no position to accuse us longtime editors for "petty thinking."