Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-27797856-20160506214346/@comment-4912646-20160507082812

Munchvtec wrote: I really don't see what the issue is with having more content. Do you guys know what an encyclopedia is?? When did we ever "decide" that we should lump stuff together and that we prefer quality over quantity? We should have both quality and quantity. I don't think anyone is in favour of flat-out removing information, it's just about how we present it. Having game-named variants on the larger technique's page isn't necessarily any less content than having multiple pages. Or at least, it doesn't have to be.

What if we were to work a proper "Variants" section into all of these more-encompassing technique articles? As in, a combination of our two current approaches: something like the Kagutsuchi article has text descriptions with no corresponding pictures, whereas the C1 article has only images with names and nothing more. Basically, like what we currently do with Susanoo.

And yeah, the old databooks do have a bunch of nonsense terms at the back, but that seems to be more for the sake of humour than anything, at least in the case of things like "spiky aloe guy" and Deidara's "patience breaking point".