Narutopedia:Sysop Requests/Archive 4

This page is an archive of requests from Project:Sysop Requests. The purpose is to keep a record of all requests, but without clogging the actual request page. Please do not edit this page

Protection-related requests

 * Team 2 - revert wars due to the preview of the next ep Kunoichi101 (talk) 05:26, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * Giant Insect Fang: Sixty-Four Palms - revert war. Munchvtec (talk) 14:52, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * Sarada Uchiha - *Sigh*, this again. A user is creating multiple accounts to edit war over the insertion of unnecessary information to the article. 03:27, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
 * Kawaki see history Kunoichi101 (talk) 01:33, May 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * Kaguya Ōtsutsuki - Revert warring currently going on in the article due to a user. 23:15, June 13, 2016 (UTC)
 * Toneri Ōtsutsuki - due to edit war Kunoichi101 (talk) 00:30, June 24, 2016 (UTC)
 * Indra Ōtsutsuki - due to edit war on putting the next week's episode preview of the Sharingan comparison. Kunoichi101 (talk) 05:58, July 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * All policy pages per discussion consensus.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 13:39, July 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅--TheUltimate3 Akimichi Symbol.svg (talk) 13:59, July 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * Boruto: Naruto Next Generations - due to someone who thought it was a "side-story", but it was official. Kunoichi101 (talk) 00:32, July 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmm... (s)he appears to be doing this once every other day or so. So I don't think protecting the page would do any of us any good (unless (s)he restores his/her edits in rapid-succession), because (s)he could likely wait and just re-add the edits after the protection period is done. I'll see if telling him/her on his/her talkpage will do any good. 00:46, July 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * Omnibender's resolved the issue. 01:43, July 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Download (2).jpg - Should be protected in the same way as File:Download.jpg. Just a generic filename for obviously bad file uploads. --Sajuuk 15:06, July 31, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ 15:11, July 31, 2016 (UTC)
 * Kunoichi Rumble: The Rivals Get Serious!: JouXIII refuses to use the talkpage, preferring to just constantly revert the contribution for nebulous reasons, despite being blatantly wrong and misinformed. A protection of about one week should be enough to cease this revert war, since Murali's trivia addition is completely valid as it doesn't matter in the slightest if something is mentioned elsewhere. --Sajuuk 18:56, September 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Sarutobii2 (talk) 19:04, September 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Sarutobii2 (talk) 19:04, September 22, 2016 (UTC)

Deletion-related requests

 * Sand Cocoon - User:Sarutobii2 fails to provide actual source for the article, making it fanon.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 17:08, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Chakra Rosary for false information: "chakra rosary" is not name of technique, it is how Toneri's Truth-Seeking Ball are described in novel. --JouXIII (talk) 11:31, April 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Can someone take a look at the articles tagged for deletion.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 13:16, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * Will look into those soon. 14:12, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Will fix links from whatlinkshere then will delete the rest soon. 14:45, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * Question: Why exactly must the Fair use rationale template be purged altogther? What harm does it pose? What issue would there be if the template itself were simply redirected to ? 01:23, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * Fair use rationale is an old template that isn't needed any longer. Before the age of the customised uploader, all files were uploaded using the old template. However, the new uploader came along and we switched to File Information. The old template only continued to exist because it was transcluded into the new one, but that's not done any more (I copied the contents of the old template into the new one), so the old template is simply sitting there as a duplicate of a newer (and better) template. I absolutely abhor redirects in the template namespace, as it causes confusion to readers (since a redirect in templates causes it to be usable as an alternate for calling the template) --Sajuuk 08:28, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * Alrighty then. 08:30, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * Could someone delete the three (totally) pointless reupload revisions from Aizaz Arif on this image please? Thanks. --Sajuuk 16:51, September 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ 16:55, September 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * User talk:Ariansyah555: The user's only contribution to the wiki is their post to their own talkpage advertising another wiki. Given they have not contributed anything here, could the talkpage be removed? Thanks. --Sajuuk 13:19, September 24, 2016 (UTC)
 * Removed the link--~Ultimate Supreme  13:52, September 24, 2016 (UTC)

Blocking-related requests

 * - vandalism on Hiding in Mist Technique --Kunoichi101 (talk) 21:45, March 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * - For creating Fanon-articles. --JouXIII (talk) 15:10, March 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * I fail to see any attempt by editors to actually direct the user towards the fanon wiki. Therefore, a block would be hasty and ill-advised. If, after giving the user a warning using the template, the user continues to make fanon articles, then a block would be appropriate. --SuperSajuuk (talk) 16:52, March 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Uses this wiki for the sole purpose of creating fanon articles and uploading non-related Naruto material, despite multiple warnings. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 02:24, March 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * - He keeps harassing me. He keeps cluttering my page with ridiculous questions and comments I don't respond for a reason. I just told him to stop and he keeps dokming it. Now if you could block him as I so nicely asked before, I'd appreciate it. --Rai 水 (talk) 17:45, March 29, 2016 (UTC)
 * - He is continously reverting edits that multiple people are reverting. --Rai 水 (talk) 22:50, April 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Sockpuppet of User:Paladin78, who is currently serving a ban..--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 04:24, April 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * What exactly is the point of a sysop requests page when not one sysop actually actions anything posted here in months? This might as well be archived and the idea abandoned. The wiki is not as active as it used to be, people can just message sysops on their talkpages for something. --Sajuuk 20:47, April 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * - ignoring the UK wording policy. Kunoichi101 (talk) 22:26, May 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Another sockpuppet of User:Paladin78. --Sajuuk 18:51, June 17, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Sockpuppeting a block. See here and here. --Sajuuk 17:57, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Simply based on their edit summaries and the pages they have edited, this just seems like another sockpuppet account for Paladin78. When will this dude learn to stop socking the blocks? --Sajuuk 19:54, June 24, 2016 (UTC)
 * - For being sock puppet of User:DarioAD. --JouXIII (talk) 15:21, June 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Repeated, excessive flaming in the forums. AsianReaper (talk) 18:54, July 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Sarutobii2 (talk) 15:44, July 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * - He is intentionally starting trouble, creating threads just to bash a character, ignores my warnings and posting nonsense. He is basically trolling. --Rai 水 (talk) 23:31, July 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Sarutobii2 (talk) 15:44, July 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Please unblock the user. They have been global-blocked from Wikia by the VSTF, so the local block is not needed or necessary, especially as the local block includes the blocking of IP: as a result, if a legitimate user picks up that IP address, they are not able to edit on the wiki for no reason. You may have to find the autoblock and remove it as well. --Sajuuk 14:46, July 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Removing content from pages, despite a warning on their talkpage. --Sajuuk 15:14, July 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 15:26, July 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * - due to image updating violation Kunoichi101 (talk) 20:55, July 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ VSTF is taking care of this one. --Sajuuk 21:03, July 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Global blocked, so why is there a completely pointless local block in place? Do people not understand global blocks or something that they keep actioning unnecessary local blocks? --Sajuuk 08:19, July 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Constantly adding false information or speculation despite multiple reverts of their edits by other contributors. Doesn't seem to want to stop these edits. --Sajuuk 20:33, July 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * Just left a warning, in case this he's just not seeing the recent changes page before seeing this. No excuses now, his next edit like the recent ones, he gets a block. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:36, July 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Vandalism and obvious "inappropriate" uploads to Samui. --Sajuuk 15:02, July 31, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ 15:05, July 31, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Obvious Paladin78 sockpuppet is obvious. --Sajuuk 12:33, August 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ 14:15, August 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Another "obvious Paladin78 sockpuppet is obvious" report. When will this guy learn to stop making accounts here? --Sajuuk 20:03, August 18, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ by Dantman 16:17, August 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Not sure what the editor is trying to accomplish. Was asked to not flood RC with minor edits, but either didn't see message, or does not understand what was asked. Don't know if the user should be blocked or warned again, up to a sysop to decide. --Sajuuk 16:55, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * Given a warning for now. 17:18, September 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * or - They appear to be alternate accounts of each other, based on the wording of these independent edit summaries: here and here. EDIT: Both users appear to be alternating vandalism to the wiki. --Sajuuk 12:37, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
 * Wording is similar, I'll give you that. But looked at every single contribution of each user (including the deleted ones). Unless I missed something blatant, doesn't look like vandalism at all to me. To me it looks like a bold editor who simply isn't accustomed to editing on a wiki. 17:16, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
 * Did you check their deleted contributions? One of them was making a number of pointless articles and the other was just posting on the talkpage (within a minute of the other) to make a pointless complaint about the said page. Both of their contributions have mostly been unneeded and had to be reverted by other editors repeatedly. Maybe it's just a case of waiting a few days for them to prove that they're socks, given they were just editing repeatedly at the same times. --Sajuuk 17:19, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
 * "'But looked at every single contribution of each user (including the deleted ones) .'" The edits may have been unneeded, and there is reasonable suspicion for the two accounts to be socks of each other, but nothing I see from this is "vandalism" or for one or both accounts to get blocked without even a warning from a sysop. Again, to me it simply looks like a bold editor who isn't accustomed to rules on the wiki. EDIT: Technically, while I understand that once an editor edits on a wiki, it is his/her responsibility to be aware of the policies of a site, this looks like a newcomer to me. So left a message on the talkpage. If the situation worsens, then I'll consider blocking. 17:45, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
 * And now they're just causing work for everyone else with pointless edits and not reading the image policy. I suspect they're using VisualEditor, but despite a number of talkpage warnings, they don't seem to be reading them or if they are, they're just disregarding the policies on the wiki. I left a final message on their talkpage advising that if they continue these bad edits, they'll be blocked, but it's up to a sysop if they just want to block now and be done with it. --Sajuuk 14:25, September 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * Ugh. 15:05, September 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * : Just came back from a block to continue doing the exact same things that got him blocked in the first place. It is clear he is going to continue using the video embed tool here and is not going to stop, no matter how many warnings or notifications are posted to his user talkpage (which he is clearly not reading), so I just recommend a lengthy ban with a link to his talkpage in the block reason (which he also isn't likely to bother reading) so he can see the posts he's ignoring. --Sajuuk 20:50, September 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. Jumped directly to two weeks and the subsequent block will be a lot longer if this continues. 21:15, September 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Was hoping a link would be left in their block reason that points to their talkpage, but no matter. They probably won't read their talkpage anyway. --Sajuuk 21:18, September 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Vandalism. Norleon (talk) 15:03, October 28, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 15:41, October 28, 2016 (UTC)
 * - Nonsense articles and spam uploads. --Sajuuk 09:33, October 31, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ 20:44, October 31, 2016 (UTC)
 * - vandalism and fanon. --Sajuuk 18:27, December 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * - vandalism and fanon. --Sajuuk 18:27, December 9, 2016 (UTC)

Forum-related requests

 * http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:195237#188 QuakingStar is flaming once again in the forums.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 01:53, February 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:195237 SuperSaiyaMan is flaming and being a passive instigator and earlier he was edit warring, in fact he just deleted my request a few mins ago which he is only a rollback and has no right to do that either.
 * 8Gates calling everyone who disagrees with him idiots, in denial, and that they are illiterate.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 21:24, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * You'd be better off bringing this to the attention of a Forum Moderator (eg Rachin123, Sarutobii2, AsianReaper or Curse of Hatred), as they're unlikely to notice this message on the sysop requests page (which is now essentially unused). However, from what I read of the post, it's just a normal comment (like a lot of posts are on the forums) and there's nothing rule breaking about it, but the mods may disagree. --SuperSajuuk (talk) 21:29, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
 * request for closing the thread.
 * The mods can't exactly mind-read. You need to provide a link to the thread you want closed for the mods to examine. Also, make sure to sign your posts on talkpages (and this requests page) using the signature button or four tildes (~). --Sajuuk 10:49, August 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Here's the required link http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:212002Namikazenaruto9 (talk)
 * ✅ --TheUltimate3 Akimichi Symbol.svg (talk) 13:18, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Move requests

 * Could Banshō Ten'in: Motion of Land be changed back to Caged Heat Arson Prison? The technique was never named that in the novel.--JouXIII (talk) 00:27, March 13, 2016 (UTC) ✅
 * Move "Eight Trigrams Spirit Palm" to Eight Trigrams Fitting Spirit Palm. Kunoichi101 (talk) 18:06, April 13, 2016 (UTC)✅
 * move Thought - Tearing Technique to Thought—Tearing Technique Kunoichi101 (talk) 08:35, April 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * Can someone move Naruto: Ninja Masters to Naruto: Shinobi Masters? Thanks. --Quick (u•t) 13:10, October 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ 14:51, October 7, 2016 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

 * SuperSaiyaMan is letting his rollback power get to him, he is edit warring with me over adding manga fact feats to Itachi and by proxy Kakashi. Kirin's page even says the proof I've given. I request his rollback status be revoked permanently. Please take the time to consider this, he is not the type to use his power fairly or wisely.
 * This dispute ended up on my talkpage somehow... 03:41, February 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Noted. I took your option into consideration Windstar7125. As I'm not sure I can actually remove rollback (i have the power to do so, just not sure I'm -supposed- to, you'll get it back next Saturday SuperSaiyaMan.)--TheUltimate3 Akimichi Symbol.svg (talk) 05:18, February 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Asking to keep watch on User:RexGodwin's edits. He was banned for doing some "questionable" stuff and he's back to repeating the same mistakes he once did.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 13:12, May 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * Asking to change Naruto Uzumaki's Part II image back from jpg-version to png-version, since User:HygorBohmHubner‎ changed it without discussion. --JouXIII (talk) 18:56, June 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * Please revert this. ShallowShaddoll (talk) 14:33, July 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * Could someone look into the Common.js/Forum.js stuff, since it seems there's a syntax error with the code that is preventing the tags/JS stuff appearing properly. --Sajuuk 13:31, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * What exactly is the problem? 14:12, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * EDIT: Never mind. Looks like it's happening on some other wiki's, so probably someone broke a script on dev wiki without realising it. --Sajuuk 14:24, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok then 15:01, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * NinjaSheik has requested me to have his rollback rights revoked. In user rights management, that's a group I can't change, so I believe a bureaucrat is required. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:45, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * She can remove the rights on her own, though. 22:03, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
 * Special:UserRights/NinjaSheik allows her to remove the rights herself. --Sajuuk 08:26, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * There may currently be some type of bug with the template. It depicts the whole "Characters in image" bullet point twice on a file for me.  08:42, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * Not a bug. Wrong usage of the template. Fixed. --Sajuuk 10:06, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * Can someone please direct me to a person who is a higher administrator around here, I'd like to lodge a formal complaint.
 * What exactly is your complaint anyway? It's likely it can be solved without needing a sysop involved. --Sajuuk 16:55, July 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm a "higher administrator". What is the complaint? 17:02, July 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * Boruto: Naruto Next Generations - can someone look over the chapters? they're not in order Kunoichi101 (talk) 18:47, July 24, 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅--~Ultimate Supreme  18:52, July 24, 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey guys, the Sadara Uchiha infobox needs a serious fix. It is listing Sarada herself as a cousin, Sakura Uchiha as mother, and Sakura Haruno as aunt. Since I don't have permission to edit it, can somebody fix this huge family problem?
 * This is because some people have been misled into believing that the infobox allows it, but the infobox does not support it in any way. I have restored the original naming structure and hopefully people will learn not to do it. "Time" will not make it update. It can be reverted to the old names if a fix for the bug is found. --Sajuuk 10:38, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * Excuse me I was wondering if we could change Naruto's infobox image from part 1 with a newer part 1 image I believe that I found a pretty good one that looks like his part 1 image but is of greater resolution. I ask this because some charcters part 1 images have change to better ones so I was wondering why not his too?--Tuxedo12 (talk) 01:15, September 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * This is a talk page matter. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 03:27, September 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Can a sysop please leave JouXIII a warning regarding his behaviour and editing practices? He has consistently ignored multiple user requests (such as to direct his grievances towards the article talkpage and to provide valid reasons in the edit summary when reverting other people's contributions), to stop revert warring (which he does on a near daily basis, usually for his own made-up/nebulous reasonings) and has a habit of making personal attacks against users (just recently, he called an entire user's completely valid and helpful contribution history "worthless": where does he get off saying things like this to people who do more than him for this wiki?). At least two sysops have told him to stop, and I've also made a very reasonable request regarding his lack of using edit summaries when reverting vandalism or bad edits, which he has successfully demonstrated to have ignored (along with the other requests on his talkpage). This has gone on for too long and he needs to be informed that his behaviour is becoming increasingly disruptive to the wiki. I don't care that he knows some Japanese, that alone does not give him any free license to just abuse the site and its editors for his own goals. Thanks. --Sajuuk 19:10, September 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * In the video game infobox, can someone fix Data Cards (broken link, the right is Data Carddass) and add mobile operating systems? Thanks. --Quick (u•t) 13:07, October 7, 2016 (UTC)