User talk:Romance Girl

Hello Romance Girl, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Shion page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Omnibender (Talk) 05:16, 19 April 2011

Re: Hey
As I already mentioned in edit summaries more than once, I delete your edits because you're overstuffing the article needlessly. You're adding way too much detail to things which are already covered in the article. Essentially, you're just making the article bigger without really adding to it. When your edits are reverted as often as they have, you don't simply revert it, you bring up the issue in the article's talk page. I couldn't care less about shipping. On the databook sentence, I deleted for already mentioned "too much detail on already covered subject". I'm not biased against any particular ship, though I am against giving it more importance than it deserves, specially in a case like this where a lot of her personality section is already devoted to her feelings towards other characters. If you keep readding those edits, because I looked it up and I'm not the only one who reverted them, I'll have to either block you for revert-warring, or protect the page so you won't edit it. I extend the "too much detail on already covered subject" to all edits you make on character relationships. I already left a bulk of your edit because it deals with her aggression instead of her feelings. Part of what makes an article good isn't just the information, but how the information is delivered. Saying a lot by saying little is important. In an unrelated note, sign your posts with four tildes ( ~ ), it leaves a link to your talk page, making it easier for people to contact you. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 02:10, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's ok. Remember to check edit summaries, people usually leave reasons for removing content there when it's not obvious, for example, if the page was vandalised. Look through talk pages and talk page archives as well, if there's something you believe is an issue, there's a chance it's been discussed already. For example, the listing of Tsunade as a presumed Lightning Release user. If you check her talk page, you'll see this can be found in both archives, as well as the current talk page, because people didn't bother looking it up before asking, and there's even some talks about that in other relevant talk pages. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:09, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Sakura loves Sasuke sentence
Friend, you're apparently the only one that thought Sakura fell out of love with Sasuke even given everything that happened in the Land of Iron. Find a point where it's definitive that she fell out of love with him (like Karin seemingly did) and your statement can stay, otherwise it'll be removed every time you add it because to be honest it's annoying.--Cerez365™ 12:32, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * I really don't care what the discussion is about, but continuing to revert war without resolving it first on a talkpage will get you blocked. S im A nt 22:15, July 12, 2011 (UTC)

What I am saying though is that we've known that Sakura liked or loved Sasuke ever since she's been introduced and professed when he was leaving the village that common knowledge in this series ergo the need to be confirming it is not necessary all the time. Hinata's love for Naruto was never professed until Pain's invasion and you don't see it being affirmed in every other paragraph in her article. By the way, I never said I found you annoying, I find the constant affirmation of her love for him annoying and unnecessary. You can be whatever you want at me, it's rally neither here nor there to me.--Cerez365™ 22:20, July 12, 2011 (UTC)