Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-45444155-20200608233611/@comment-46080847-20200618124307

ReweR 1331 wrote: @LegionZero, @Mojiretsu

No offense, but you're such clowns. Thank you for showing your talent and discussion by resorting to base insults when your way of thinking is shown faulty. You have proven with this statement than any further discussion with you is fruitless.

A4RONS4JIS4M wrote: It is given that Rasa is Gaara's father ryt? You also know that naruto has the same whiskers as kurama.... Then the fact that Boruto and Himawari got 1 less on each side from Naruto. Which just proves my point that being the offspring of a jinchuriki "could" give you some visual differences than if you weren't. I was just pointing that out. If you wanna ridicule somebody for that then go ahead and spam walls of text twice a day just to fill up your ego. Thanks bro. Also, none of the examples you posted are the result of using a Kekkei Genkai so they don't contribute anything to the discussion. As I said, it was not intended as ridicule, it was usage of your own argument about aesthetics against other ridiculous points. If you want to take the black space around Shukaku's pupils as being area around his eye, and not part of his eye (I'd need to see him blink to know if just the yellow spots constitute the eye itself), then yes, Gaara's marking is potentially indicative of the Shukaku. Not Jiton. That is what we have been saying. Rasa and Karura were not Jinchuriki of Shukaku, Gaara was made a Jinchuriki while still in the womb, so it's not the case of Naruto inheriting whiskers from Kushina or Boruto from Naruto, where their parents were Jinchuriki. You bringing up the Jinchuriki's physical traits also aren't Kekkai Genkai either, I'll point out. You can't use the defense past that of "well Shukaku has Jiton", because Kurama who you used as your argument has no Kekkai Genkai that are associated with him, yet still Naruto and Boruto had the whiskers.

The point of this thread was to say 'Person A has Trait because of Thing, and Person B has Trait, therefore person B must have Thing'. We applied THIS logic to things like the Uzumaki Clans red hair - Person A (Kushina) has Trait (Red Hair) because of Thing (Uzumaki Genetics), and Person B (Sasori) has Trait (Red Hair), therefore Person B (Sasori) must have the thing (Uzumaki Genetics). It doesn't just have to be about Kekkai Genkai, because why would it be that arbitrary. Why is Kekkai Genkai the only thing that must have aesthetic links like that? Your logic requires such ridiculous specificity.

I bid you both go look into the concept of Occum's Razor - the simplest explanation is most likely to be true, in this case the simplest explanation being 'it was aesthetics', not some conspiracy theory of Gaara secretly having access to a Kekkai Genkai that is one of the most powerful of the Nature Kekkai Genkai yet never using it in another fundamental way beyond 'pocket sand'. Legion, I advise that you not bother with this anymore, a matter I have no intention of bothering with further either, considering the original poster thinks petty insults makes for good debate once his argument has been invalidated.