Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-1514283-20140829001753/@comment-1207741-20140830065512

Ten Tailed Fox wrote: Being obvious to you and using basic reading comprehension to come to a conclusion are two entirely different things. I don't understand the difference. If a person becomes convinced of something due to "reading comprehension", does it not become "obvious" for them?

Ten Tailed Fox wrote: Based on that one article alone, I've given up on actually trying to get anything done on this wiki.

Its impossible. Forgive me, but I roll my eyes at this sort of dramatic. If a discussion is getting you down because it's not going anywhere, you know what you can do? ''' Edit something else. ''' There are over 5,000 articles on this wiki. I feel safe in guaranteeing that at least 4,000 of those articles have nothing contentious relating to them. You can edit those articles and nobody is going to be fight you over it. But if you would rather not edit the wiki at all because of one discussion, then that's your problem and yours alone.

Reliops wrote: That being said, I don't think Obito/Tobi is a particularly good example given the multitude of possibilities and duality of the character, and it that was way back when at a time Kishimoto still bothered with data books, i.e. the famous line of "wait for the data books" actually meant something. There was a three year gap between Tobi's appearance and the third databook, and the third databook gave no answers. It was another three years before the issue was finally settled, leaving a total wait time of six years. Have any of the current disputes been going on for six years? Or even three years? If not, then your dismissal doesn't seem appropriate. Because - and I could be wrong - I don't think any ongoing arguments are older than a couple of months. Which I guess is a long time by some measurements. But in the whole history of the series a couple of months is no time at all.