Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-32466165-20170722022140/@comment-5085906-20170803201556

Hungry Ghost realm wrote: Why dont you become a donkey then?Pad your back with a saddle for Lord jesus to sit on top of your back." Everybody has been arguing" so what?Why should I follow your stupid conventional bias-filled opinions?I think the earlier question describes you pretty well.Not everyone can go with your ass-sidewards logic filled with delusional logic.You sound like Im crapping on your faulty stupid opinion when in reality Im just stating facts made by the director.Is that so tough for you to look at?Not everyone can comply with your head-so-stuck-inside-your-ass-that-you-can-taste-the-gum-inside-it-and-cannot-see-the-outer-world-because-its-so-dark-in-there-with-gum-stuck-on-your-throat kinda logic. I dont see why you guys are trying so hard to offend me just because I said some facts.Is it that so hurtful to your low self-esteem?Ohh so youre trying that "we dont have facts to retaliate so lets stick with mindless name-calling" tactic huh? Yeah, but doesn't it feel weird to you that literally NO ONE agrees with you? Like, there's not one single person who looked at your arguments and then looked at the databooks and came to the same conclusion? Trust me, I am the first guy who calls out people when they shit on other people's opinions, but I usually make sure those opinions are not products of a logical fallacy so infinite that you could basically pass them off as something completely unrelated to the matter at hand.

AND, people just did. They just debunked your arguments using your own logic, but you were quick to come up with retorts like "That was a translation error..." or "Susanoo means he with the ability to help by all means so that's proof that it is a living being." No, it isn't. Izanagi means 'he who invites' so what am I to make of that when the technique itself has nothing to do with inviting or being invited? Most of MS techniques are based on Shinto gods - Amaterasu, Izanami, Izanagi, Susanoo - but their names have very little to do with what they actually accomplish. So, stop trying to fabricate evidence where there is none.

At no point did I insult you in my earlier post, however. You could probably interpret them as insults if you dig deep. The point of that horse analogy was to tell you that the world's not always wrong and your interpretation of things is not always right. So, thank you for completely missing it. And seriously, who said donkey? And what does Jesus have to do with any of it?