Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-44437908-20200507051002/@comment-6769189-20200513185653

Babyfriend1 wrote:

but you included kamui in his typical moveset which he doesn't use at all in part 1 He kinda have couldnt back then, but somehow he used it significantly more than anyof his Part 1 jutsu aside from Raikiri

Babyfriend1 wrote:

or after part 2 He kind have cant any more

Despite not having Kamui for long he still used it more than his other Jutsu aside from Raikiri

Babyfriend1 wrote:

and also why in the world would you go by in-universe or irl years between uses? That makes no sense considering there's timeskips and characters without opportunities to be shown using a certain move in fights between distant uses e.g. It gives context to his fighting style. Take a look at how often he uses his techniques. Most techniques can be counted on one hand but Raikiri and Kamui he uses multiple times per fight. The OP knocks Naruto for not having enough jutsu but other main characters rarely use most of the jutsu they know

My counter point is that every character bases their fighting style around 2 or 3 abilities so its not super weird that Naruto's fighting style revolves around 2 or 3 abilities.

Babyfriend1 wrote:

kimimaro who apparently has no typical moveset. He has a moveset. The one we saw him use

Oriondragon181119 wrote:

Ya that's what I am saying I am not comparing naruto with any other he developed too much fast in the war where in 3 years training he didn't developed that much. Sasuke and Kakashi got the same kind of uber development at the end. Sasuke was nowhere near Naruto's strength and he was bumped up to being his equal.

Oriondragon181119 wrote:

And about the mentioning of senju clan there are no senju alive except tsunade so the strongest clan in entire world dies without any reason Who said they died out? They have a history of assimilating into other clans. They likely intermingled to the point that Senju as a clan was no more.

Tsunade doesnt even have a last name as far as we know. We dont know who her parents were or what their clan name was but that doesnt matter.

Oriondragon181119 wrote:

the god of shinobi dies without a reason Does there need to be a reason? Does it change the course of the story if we know how or why he died? He isnt unkillable, at the end of the day he was just a powerful man, not a god like his nickname

Oriondragon181119 wrote:

but we get to to see how uchiha clan died and how madara died twice that's what angers me most Why does it matter how many times we see Madara die? We saw Danzo die like, 11 times and it doesnt make him more or less important than he was. We saw technically saw Naruto die twice, didnt effect how important he was to the story. For the longest time we didnt know how Minato died and he was one of the most important influences on the series. We dont know what happened to Tsunade's parents but even if we did it wouldnt make them important. We saw a ton of no names die in the war and guess what. Their deaths didnt make them important in the slightest.

What if Madara didnt die the 1st time and he just went into hiding like he did the 1st he resurected himself? Nothing changes

Why do you make it seem like either of Madara's deaths were not major plot points and tied to the story of the Senju/Uzumaki? You get mad over insignificant things.