Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1018594-20150708054235/@comment-1018594-20150711002212

It can go to hell. That doesn't mean it will. If a warning has been blatantly implemented that says bullshit/trolling will be dealt with, then a user has no right to claim it as an abuse of power. Obviously, the resulting threads will have some apparent guidelines, should this poll come to fruition.

Dantman did intervene in the Sajuuk case, but only after damn near the entire wiki came to him with complaints and who knows how many clashes Sajuuk had with various Sysops. Multiple users abandoned the chat entirely because every time Sajuuk was online, he was complaining about Sysops. It would have been gauche for Dan to not have done something.

Even though this is my proposal, I am completely impartial when I say this: the only way these threads can go to shit is if the people that are supposed to be keeping them on topic stand back and let them.