Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25075055-20140212122150/@comment-1732320-20140306005112

Don't think we need another bureaucrat. If you were here before or even read earlier threads Dan actually hated the fact that his edit count was higher than actual editors. He'll more than likely never be an "active user" since he's more the type to let the wiki do it's own thing until/unless he is needed.

With regards to this topic, I think I've moved from opposed to neutrality. Still don't really see the need, but I wouldn't have a problem if it were done. If only to manage the amount of persons in the Rollback group here.