User talk:TheUltimate3

Wikipedia Archives
Hey TheUltimate3, I was wondering... isn't it about time you deleted some of those old Wikipedia archives? They kinda mess up the Special:WantedFiles page and such. --ShounenSuki (talk 09:32, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Hello!What's going on?
Like the headline,Hi!You probably got this alot from other user with this number,but this really my first time here.But it's always cool to me for a welcoming.--24.161.125.222 (talk) 19:10, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

dont know if you know but the name of shusui's minded-controlling technique is doryoku. check the manga your self, 480 page 11. --Me1

your welcome for the edit on the nagato page Wierdox   it's a duck 'cuz it said moo!  01:32, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

hey
hey, i usually find the manga spoilers on wed, but can u tell me how u get them sometimes monday, and give me a link maybe thnx--Sauske-Blaze (talk) 03:16, February 3, 2010 (UTC) Sauske-Blaze

Danzo's Juinjutsu
What I've been editing on there is actually correct. Read chapter 481 if you don't believe me.
 * Don't you just get sick of this, Ultimate? D: ~Hakinu (talk 13:36, February 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Every week its the same thing. Every week. I should really just make a Spoiler Page and be done with it...but...so lazy.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 13:43, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, um...
In response to your question, since you didn't reply in the other thread...

File:Seal_For_The_Flying_Thunder_God_Technique.PNG The image that depicts the "jutsu shiki" on the right; there are kanji marks on Mahiru's foot that can clearly be seen. The first symbol is 忍, translated as "nin" or 'burden' as seen in the first part of the word "ninja", as I mentioned in my first post on the Flying Thunder God Technique discussion board. --Reikson (talk) 14:07, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Re: 2 Things
Eh, I'm not really good at css or colors I have bad color sense... But If someone wants to make a list of color values i can implement them... though some of them may make it harder to read. Simant (talk) 17:44, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, what would it do in the case of people like orochimaru who have multiple loyalties at different parts of the series. Simant (talk) 00:36, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

I guess I could take the first value in the list and use that as the primary affiliation. A problem though is, that I'm not even sure what filenames the css files are stored under on the wikia, also I don't have permissions to edit them; which even if I did have, I would still do poorly at color schemes. Simant (talk) 18:30, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Unregistered contributor 78.83.110.243
Hello, i am Unregistered contributor 78.83.110.243 as you called me. i mention it with a sense of humor. I love to accept your invitation and create an account in narutopedia. see you soon on the pages of narutopedia. 78.83.110.243 (talk) 17:58, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

WHY
Why is Sasuke's profile not done up realy well:S theres so much information that is missing from there!, and why are people saying that the info is already there:S when there isen't?. Sasuke's profile needs to be done up and REALY fast!.--00sasukeuchiha (talk) 19:52, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Madara
Continuing our debate.

IF Akatsuki was around 12 years old and let's say Nagato was about 27 when he died, that would mean he would have had to create it when he was 15 years old which is a teenager. Yet that still wouldn't matter because we saw him when he was fighting Hanzo (do you remember him? He was the first leader of Village Hidden in the Rain) he was about 17-20 years old there and neither Nagato, Yahiko nor Konan appeared to be in Akatsuki or villains for that matter. Thus, if Akatsuki was around 12 years old, that would mean it would ALREADY BE CREATED by that time.

From what we know, Nagato has had no affiliation with Kirigakure yet Madara has. Also Itachi has stated Madara created Akatsuki http://www.onemanga.com/Naruto/386/11/.

And I know Madara is an old mofo.

Are you sure you want to keep going at this? It seems I'm winning by a good supply of evidence over your "speculative" crap. Axel Carnage (talk) 05:11, February 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * I think it should be added, I said 12 years as it was the start of the series. Not Shippuden when Madara's crisis came to a head. That being said.


 * /sigh. I know about Hanzo. That was where Yahiko died, at the approximate age of 25-30. We do not know specifically when that was, nor do we know how long it took Akatsuki to form.
 * One doesn't actually need to be affiliated with a place to form a organization there. For example, someone with Pain's power could have very easily rolled up into Kiri and left without much issue. For sake of argument, Madara could have called Pain to Kiri, they formed Akatsuki, and Pain went back to Amegakure.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 05:20, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Ok I'm done discussing this with you. You're not providing any evidence against my already common sense statement and you're constantly bringing up the same facts I already know. All you're doing is backing it up with speculative nonsense that really doesn't make any sense.

Remember that link that I showed you. Itachi said it himself.

Pain is a fake leader. Madara is the creator. Axel Carnage (talk) 05:33, February 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * To but in to what is apparently a concluded discussion: Danzo's article, courtesy of ShounenSuki, indicates that Danzo and Hanzo teamed up during the Third Ninja War, which would place Yahiko's death at the same time. Also, you're spending too much time debating over word choice. Nagato at least thinks he founded Akatsuki. That's all that matters as far as the wiki is concerned. Whether or not he actually created it remains to be seen. I also find the suggestion that TheUltimate is using too much speculation hilarious. ~SnapperTo 06:07, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Episode - video links
Should I create links to crunchyroll for the original naruto series (ep 1-220) like the ones the Shippuden series already have? I'm hesitant because membership is required and I don't wanna direct people to stuff they might not be able to watch. Simant (talk) 19:13, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re: New Spoiler Policy
Thanks for the update. ^_^ Jacce | Talk 19:46, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry!!!
I've done it the right way this time :-)?

Two Hours
It's cool to know the new date for manga changes though just to let you know I'm putting it back in two hours.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 03:08, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Bugs
Something weird happened, all of a sudden, the wiki skin no longer haves the orange background with Konoha's symbol, and templates everywhere aren't working like they're supposed to. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:07, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * You're not the only one, Omni. Haven't tried any templates yet, but the skin has gone poof! ~Hakinu (talk 22:08, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, the skin returned to regular pages, but during editing, it vanishes. The template thing I said is about the character infobox, it was if as it was half-rendered. Some stuff happened, some didn't. Images and names appeared, but boxes wouldn't collapse, and it wasn't aligned to the right. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:14, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * It works fine for me tho....>.> And I know nothing about Wiki skins...--TheUltimate3 (talk) 00:26, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whatever it was, it vanished all together. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:44, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Spoiler warning
I know the policy was changed, but the spoiler warning during page edits also has to be changed to go according to it. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:53, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a MediaWiki article, sysops are the only ones who can edit them. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:50, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

File:Founding_Uchiha.png
Could you protect this image? Thanks~ ~Hakinu (talk 13:14, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry about the image you just deleted. I was posting the tags to delete it and didn't see that you did until I clicked submit. Could you delete it again please. Sorry.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 21:55, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

reguarding an edit :3
Why did you remove the part i added to the Byakugan article? it seemed fine to me. is it because the picture? it doesnt break the policyShelldone (talk) 13:32, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

But its not an artist mistake.... would one like this really be ignored by kishimoto? we have to take it as it is, we dont know if it is a mistake so we cant assume it is, especialy if its something large like thisShelldone (talk) 15:05, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

really? prove it wasnt a mistake? you should be the one proving it is a mistake. the previous mistakes he made were obvious, but this we know nothing about yet, he hasnt adressed it. Just like the mistake he made with Torune's glasses on his mask, was fixed later on.... this wasnt. I said on the talk page, "Page 9 yeah the hair is blocking, but on page 10 its clearly shown as one byakugan because hair isnt blocking on that one. but you have to remember that the byakugan doesnt have a pupil unless its activated, as seen in previous manga chapters and even in the anime." What he did with the example you have given was a grammar error, this is a drawing. There are others who agree with me, like Deva27, and like i said, we cant assume it is a mistake, if by chance it is revealed later on to be a mistake that part can simply be removed and something stated in the trivia section. thats progress.--Shelldone (talk) 15:19, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

okay i did say something on her talk page, but im talking to you: actually it was two panels she had one activated, im not accusing it not being a mistake, im taking it for what it is. After she impacted the ground she was seen with one, then she prepared to attack pain again with that new jutsu she revealed. she could have activated the other later. but why assume things before its confirmed? --Shelldone (talk) 15:44, April 3, 2010 (UTC)