Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-31337598-20180220093824/@comment-31099706-20180223012051

I'm pretty sure Akatsuki's public plan was to power up a jutsu enough to destroy a part of a land/Earth in order to make the other spared part ear of violence and then form peace?

And don't know why, but I guess Naruto was the best friend of Sasuke(Didn't Itachi really admire that bond) and apart from the whole "kill your best friend" thing, I think he wanted his brother to still have that bond? Apart from being a hero, Itachi isn't a guy who isn't ready to kill a child to save the world, so it's kind of confusing om why he did it.

And about the said strongest Shinobi, I think the best part of part 1 was that no one could actually be the top strongest. Almost all of the part 1 guys could be killed by some other guy, who would be equally strong. And surroundings and info makes every battles of their differ.

So even if one choose Jiraya, he must be acknowledged under the three way dead lock thing, since by what it states, Jiraya is weak against Orochimaru,(which is reasonable, considering he showed himself as a immortal) and Oro is weak against Tsunade and Tsunade is weak against Jiraya.

So, I guess all the Shinobis of the part 1, could be taken as such. Like each one might have their own potentiel opponent who can kill them. But by part 2, it became some hyper level chakra beings, like the gap between every shinobi against Naruto and Sasuke are huge. And Naruto is literally immortal(just like Hashi) so it just makes him so much of the above against most ninjas.

Plus, shouldn't Gaara be on this list? He did finish of S Rank missions without getting himself a scratch.