User talk:Ursuul

Edit Dispute
Hello, I'm Sosuagwu17. I've had a problem regarding a recent edit I made to the Team 5 page that got reverted by an admin named Omnibender regarding the appearance of a different teammate to Metal Lee showing up in the Boruto manga the same way that Lee was shown with two 2 different teammates in the Boruto movie before they got changed to be Denki and Iwabee in the Boruto anime and novel. He insists that the Genin never showed up in the manga and he is too off focus to be properly shown when a panel from Boruto manga, chapter 3, page 13, clearly shows a different Genin from Denki or Iwabee standing right next to Lee and sporting the same outfit as Lee with a good portion of his body clearly shown in the panel indicating that this was Lee's original teammate before being switched to Denki and Iwabee for the anime and novel and even a similar scene in the Boruto movie shows Lee standing next to his two different genin teammates wearing the same outfit as him during the True or False Phase of the Chunin Exams from the Boruto Series. I tried contacting another admin in this community to help me out with the edit dispute with another admin I have a differing opinion with and give me his thoughts on the whole matter even bringing it up to the article's talkpage when he told me to do so but everytime I try to contact the admin for help to get his feedback, he just plainly ignores me and doesn't seem like he wants to help or bother with the situation at all when his duty is to help out a user with an edit dispute the best way he can if it at this point requires attention from admins since I tried asking other users on their opinion on the matter but some refuse to reply/or add their feedback to the matter on the Team 5 talkpage and one even said that they have no opinion on the issue I have at hand with thd other user. It's been days since I brought it to the talkpage and I haven't gotten a whole lot of responses. The Bureaucrat of this site doesn't seem like he's been active for months and I don't know how long/soon it will take for him to reply or whether he would reply at all if I send him this message about the edit problem so my only option was to go to a Wiki Manager for help and I want help from you to assess this situation regarding the dispute I have with another user over an edit I made so this case can be done as soon as possible since I've gone quite impatient for not getting any feedback from another admin and most users I asked to give their feedback on the matter. Sosuagwu17 (talk) 23:25, September 22, 2020 (UTC)

I never asked/told anybody to support my own view of things in the dispute nor was I forcing anybody to help me win an argument over an edit dispute, so I would really appreciate you not assuming that. I simply asked people to bring their own opinion on the matter to see whether any consensus can be formed to see if one side of the argument was acceptable or not while I bring my own evidence, reasoning and points in my side of the argument to give my own opinion on why the change should be necessary. And especially when there is two users that don't agree with something and can't form an agreement in the talkpage, it's always good to have a third party involved so that way we can get their input on the matter and see whether a change or reversion should be necessary in the edit dispute in which case if most of the other users who decide to enter the edit dispute agree with one side over the other and finalizes which was more acceptable then that forms a consensus between the two users involved in the dispute which is essentially important to end a dispute between two users when it comes to edit conflicts, that's why I was sending people messages to see if they were able to bring an opinion in on the matter which I see nothing wrong on doing and I have not seen any rules against someone doing this if a third party doesn't come in to input on the situation at the right time when needed. Anyways, the dispute with the Team 5 edit has been already taking care of as all in the talkpage agreed that the Genin did show up as stated in my point of view and changed it accordingly to how I was trying to revise the article so you don't need to worry about it any longer and thanks for helping and assessing the situation even though it is not particularly your job to do so when it comes to edit disputes in local wikia communities. Sosuagwu17 (talk) 21:12, October 1, 2020 (UTC)

Re: summary tags
I don't know what kind of fix was implemented, but it didn't affect the issue I mentioned at all. Take a look at Baryon Mode (chapter). You can see that there's a break in the text that coincides with the use of the summary tag. If I move the the summary end tag around and preview the edit, the same paragraph break continues to happen. There are other issues that were caused by the migration, some have been fixed, some have not. I'm currently checking around to see which specific functionalities that got borked so I can make a condensed report instead of several ones. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Do I add that to MediaWiki:Common.css or MediaWiki:Wikia.css? Some of the issues I was going to report got fixed by Snapper2, who actually understands how some of the template code works. Issues I've noticed that still need fixing:
 * References are getting pushed way down. For example, see Earth Release: Tearing Earth Turning Palm. Instead of the references being listed right after the section heading, they're being pushed way down below the end of the infobox. I also edit over at the Avatar FANDOM, and I know they had that issue as well, I reported to it to Lady Lostris over there, don't know if their solution applies here.
 * Debut chapter, volume and episodes are showing up wrong in character articles. For example, Boruto Uzumaki. In the debut section of the character infobox, the manga and anime debuts link to the correct chapter and volume for manga, and episode for anime, but they're not being styled as they were before. Manga debut was listed as "Series Volume Number", "Series Chapter Number". Anime debut was listed as "Series Episode Number". In this example, it would be "Naruto Volume #72, Chapter #700" for manga, and "Boruto Episode #1" for anime. We do have some number display corrections for the chapters of Volume 73 due to how they were published, as chapter 700+n. You can see it at Sarada Uchiha (volume).
 * Volume covers are no longer loading at List of Volumes.
 * Certain article links aren't being italicised in infoboxes. For a number of articles, we consider them to be unnamed when we don't have an actual, proper/official name to them, in which case we use descriptive, placeholder names. To make clear this status for such articles, they're italicised in infoboxes. For example, unnamed jutsu Susanoo: Great Fireball Technique is supposed to appear italicised in infoboxes. It is properly done in its debut episode infobox The Final Battle (by the way, the way this episode is displayed in this jutsu infobox is how characted debuts are supposed to look, from two points above) and parent jutsu infoboxes Susanoo and Fire Release: Great Fireball Technique. It is not italicised in other infoboxes where it should, in jutsu sections this case in Mangekyō Sharingan, Sasuke Uchiha and Uchiha Clan. This also happens for unnamed characters (like Obito's Grandmother and tools (like Flak Jacket), with it looking right in some infoboxes and not others.
 * There's an issue with what I believe is referred as the MediaCleaner functionality of our templates. It deals with what should or shouldn't appear in an infobox depending on the different media involved (manga, anime, novel, game, movie). Snapper2 made some progress on that front. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 05:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I've added your fix for the summary tag break issue, and the reference fix. I've purged the cache, I've null-edited, but nothing's changed, don't know if I implemented them wrong. I have zero coding know-how. Every volume listed under the Tankōbon section should have the linked articles' infobox image appearing in the cell that lists links to the chapters, aligned to the right, directly below the English release date. Whenever I load the page, the image of the first volume actually loads, but gets hidden when the page finishes loading. In the issue using the Susanoo: Great Fireball Technique example, in the infoboxes I mentioned the link is incorrect, because the link is appearing as "Susanoo: Great Fireball Technique" instead of "Susanoo: Great Fireball Technique". In the Mangekyō Sharingan, Sasuke Uchiha and Uchiha Clan articles, in the infobox section listing jutsu, the link isn't being shown in italics, which should be the case because the article has it tagged as unnamed. If you look at that articles and the other ones I gave as examples, you'll see it has a "unnamed [jutsu/character/tool] depending on the article. That should make the links to those articles show up italicised in other infoboxes. Right now, that isn't happening as it should. Also, not interested in Community Council. I'm sure there has to have been an update or new feature added to Fandom since I've joined, but I can't think of a single one. They've all been either social focused features which I abhor, or updates which always break something this fandom uses, requiring patches that don't always work. Ignore the first bit, it suddenly showed up after I made a couple other edits. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:38, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

UCP Updates
So, is all wikia code removed now and we are back to plain MW (except the skin I guess)?

In any case, do you know how to create modals now as our old  is breaking on our infoboxes right now? ~Ultimate Supreme  04:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)