Forum:Notability

Whether or not a topic is notable enough to have its own article has been a problem for this wiki for several years. There have been numerous discussions about it, sometimes to determine the notability of one topic, other times to determine the notability of several unrelated but similar topics. These discussions rarely go anywhere because the wiki has no firm definition of what is and isn't notable. Without this sort of guideline people end up basing their decisions on existing articles and inconsistency reigns.

It is time the wiki set some notability criteria.

Statements
Read the following statements. Consider each statement and evaluate it on its own. Then, for each statement, indicate whether you agree or disagree by signing ( ~ ) under the corresponding heading. Try not to be neutral. Try not to abstain. If you change your mind, strike (do not remove) previous !votes. Please hold comments until the end.

Exists
"A topic is notable by virtue of its existence."

71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:01, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
 * Agree
 * Disagree

Name
"A topic is notable if it has been properly named."


 * Agree

71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:01, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
 * Disagree

Title
"A topic is notable if, although it has not been properly named, it has a unique in-universe title or description."

71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:02, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
 * Agree
 * Disagree

Relation
"A topic is notable if, although it has not been properly named, it can easily be described in terms of a named topic. Ex: "X's mother" or "Y's ability"."


 * Agree

71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:03, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
 * Disagree

Description
"A topic is notable if all that is known about it cannot reasonably be conveyed in an article that is likely to link to it."

71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:04, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
 * Agree
 * Disagree

Appear 2
"A topic is automatically notable if it has appeared on at least 2 separate occasions."


 * Agree

71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:04, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
 * Disagree

Appear 3
"A topic is automatically notable if it has appeared on at least 3 separate occasions."

71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:05, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
 * Agree
 * Disagree

Databook
"A topic is NOT  notable if it appeared in the manga and the databook for that portion of the series did not give it special mention."

71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:07, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
 * Agree
 * Disagree

Dialogue 1
"A character is automatically notable if they have had at least 1 line of dialogue."


 * Agree

71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:07, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
 * Disagree

Dialogue 3
"A character is automatically notable if they have had at least 3 lines of dialogue."


 * Agree

71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:08, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
 * Disagree

Dialogue 5
"A character is automatically notable if they have had at least 5 lines of dialogue."

71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:09, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
 * Agree
 * Disagree

Unique
"An ability, item, or group is notable if its uniqueness cannot reasonably be argued."

71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:10, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
 * Agree
 * Disagree

Discussion
All contributors to the wiki are welcomed to weigh in with their opinions. On January 23 the discussion will be closed and a standard will be drawn from the views expressed. Once this standard is agreed upon, all existing and future articles will be expected to live up to that standard.

The results of this forum are most likely to affect the articles listed below. You may wish to examine the list to decide where exactly you draw the line with notability.

If you have anything to discuss, please do so below. Please also suggest new statements that would be useful in formulating a guideline or ways in which existing statements can be clarified/improved. ~SnapperTo 01:12, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

One thing i say off the bat is that we should have pages for each group, clan, village, etc, to put down unnamed characters or things that play a semi-important role in the story. Like a disambiguation page of sorts for minor characters. Cause to tell the truth i'm tired of having Jutsu articles that have no user listed for it, and i'm like "who used it?". We could simply have a redirect for that character on that page.71.71.58.231 (talk) 02:15, January 9, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan