Talk:Kohada

Anime
Why is there no Anime pictures of her? Does it mean you haven't got the right picture? --Cococrash11 (talk) 03:26, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * The steam in the anime obscures her almost completely, so the manga image is still used.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 11:07, October 22, 2012 (UTC)

Whats the point?
Whats the point of this page? It is literately 7 lines long (well if you count the last line funeral has a line). Not counting the headers, and content box. 7 seems to be a waste to have it. Yes i understand wanting to have info on everyone that has appeared in Naruto but still 7 lines?

The same goes for all the other pages with a hand fill of lines. Would it not be better to have 1 page for all the characters that have pages with only a hand fill of lines. Say anymore then 30 lines (debatable) warrants a page of their own. It would seem to be better then having 5+ pages that literately say this person appeared once in the series.

Otoha Is 5 lines. Emina Is 11 lines. --Darkhunter-X (talk) 03:36, May 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * I would say no. They are all different persons, with their own names. --Kasan94 Nara Symbol.svg (Talk) 10:21, May 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * I can't really see the point of this article either. She's just a background character and even the section on the article written about this person talks about it from Jiraiya's perspective anyway. Voting for it to be deleted. (EDIT: Emina is a movie only character jfyi) --Speysider Talk Page 11:23, May 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * I thought we kept the characters whose names we actually have? We got her name from a databook, and therefor we got this article. --Kasan94 Nara Symbol.svg (Talk) 11:47, May 30, 2014 (UTC)

We have already had these talks, she was in a data book so she stays. Munchvtec (talk) 11:47, May 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * She got a name, and a place in the databook. She stays. And so does the movie character.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 12:00, May 30, 2014 (UTC)

I understand that. But i did not ask for them to be deleted.

I asked would it not be better to have 1 page for all the characters divided up into sections that have pages with only a hand fill of lines. I mean that would be smaller then some 2nd characters. Say anymore then 30 lines (debateable) warrents a page of their own. It would seem to be better then having 5+ pages that literately say this person appeared once in the series.

It would take up less space then having 5-6 pages that are literately just saying that this person appeared in Naruto and be earlier if someone wanted to look up characthers that appeared in 1 panel of Naruto or 3 mins of anime/movie.

--Darkhunter-X (talk) 12:06, May 30, 2014 (UTC)

Whats the problem with the number of pages, its not like you have to find a page by looking through a list. you can just look up the name. you are one user who wants to change it. Bring your problems to an admin and ask them. We cant have every characters discussion on her talk page. Munchvtec (talk) 12:21, May 30, 2014 (UTC)

I see that your a newer user so I dont really think anyone will change it based on your opinion. Munchvtec (talk) 12:23, May 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * And being new is no reason to disregard his opinion. Remember that.
 * Space isn't an issue, we have lots of it. In fact, our space is virtually limitless. And we generally shy away from super long articles with a bunch of things added to it.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 12:37, May 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * @Munchvtec it doesn't mean that a user is new that his opinion doesn't count.
 * I would say no to deleting. No matter how short this article is or how she only appeared in the series once, this is a canon character with her own page in the databook. ~ IndxcvNovelist →talk • contribs • watty← 13:00, May 30, 2014 (UTC)