Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-28614651-20200422182101/@comment-39350828-20200520123634

LegionZero wrote: So baseless assumption You're misunderstanding. I'm offering reasons why saying he would've tried to bail completely is an assumption. This is how it has gone:

you: he would've done X if Z was true

me: except that he could've done Y instead if Z was true

you: that's just a baseless assumption

You first assume that your version of events is true by default and then put the burden of proof on me to disprove them. All I have done so far was to show how you've not proven that naruto dodged the beam by moving faster than the speed of light because you try to prove it by using your explanation of how naruto dodged it which hinges on the staff being destroyed instantly and naruto being unaware of madara being about to attack or not attempting to move out of the way which are only assumed by you and not actually shown. Saying that these assumptions have not been disproven or that it's an assumption to say that they are untrue doesn't invalidate that point. LegionZero wrote: Babyfriend1 wrote:

I already addressed this earlier With a theory based on an assumption nit backed by the manga no, with facts that show how your assumption that his surprise was due to not knowing madara was about to shoot some jutsu out of his mouth isn't backed by the manga How? You can read your own posts and see how This isn't really an argument. I can do the same thing and say your interpretation is flawed and then when you ask for evidence and reasoning tell you to look at your own posts until you see it.