User talk:Emperor of Water

Just to make one thing clear, we don't list game or movie jutsus in a characters infobox. Jacce 15:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Game techniques
You created a lot of articles about game techniques, but perhaps it would be a good idea to specify what game they are from exactly. --ShounenSuki (talk 12:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Also, all those ranks you gave those game techniques. Were they stated in the games or did you make them up? --ShounenSuki (talk 02:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

New articles
When you're adding links to articles to help in creating new pages, please hit Preview instead of Save page. You sometimes forget to remove the link and you otherwise clog the watch list with null edits. ~SnapperTo 22:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Headline
When you make a headline, we usually uses at least two =. Jacce 11:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

The Technique Pages
When a jutsu page is small, about a paragraph or 2 long, don't put those breaks into them. It destroys the flow of the article and just makes it look bad.--TheUltimate3 13:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Didn't even look at my message did you?--TheUltimate3 13:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Now I have reason to think you're ignoring me. That would be...unwise to say the least. It's very simple just respond to the talk page.--TheUltimate3 13:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * But it doesn't. For the shorter articles the sudden break just makes it look bad. There is only so much you can say about and article and when that's already there, breaking it into a one line section breaks the flow.--TheUltimate3 13:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Except a section to a one or two sentence "Drawback" like I said breaks the flow. We'd look more unorganized with that.--TheUltimate3 13:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * There is nothing that can be done. When an article is short such breaks disrupt it. (And the lines I was referring to where sentences, which the Water Drill one only had 2 of.)--TheUltimate3 13:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * My problem is that your method breaks the flow of the article with sections and what not. There is no conceivable way you can fix this however because the articles are to short to warrant a sections like that. They are short because all the information we have is all the information we have, unless you add unnecessary fluff which would only be removed anyway. --TheUltimate3 14:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)