Board Thread:Boruto Discussions/@comment-945885-20171013084137/@comment-25227224-20171014155422

You're special pleading. Who in the manga noted that the events were different? If this is in fact the case, sure I agree with you. That would be something that I would have to prove thus the burden is on my myself.

But in this case, you made the positive claim that there is differences, well what are they if I may ask? It begs the question. Because if this is a reference to the Kirigakure trip in the manga, what is to say that is wasn't the same trip?

Example 1 (anime) : Academy student Boruto went to Kirigakure and went to field trip. Example 2 (Manga): Boruto recalls going a field trip in Kirigakure, without (assuming the details aren't different because there is not Chapter 17 available, yet ~ if i'm wrong I concede my point) contradiction, as Boruto was in fact in the academy and went on the field trip in that specific time placement.

The only way that you would be able to argue against it would be to explain the burden on how both trips are different. Unless you're in denial that he went on field trip Kirigakure in his academy days.

But this is completely irrelevant, the position of whether or not he went to the academy is moving the goal post. Therefore extrapolating past what I actually want to note. I'm simply explaining in the first post, that there in fact is differences between both comparison of the 'field trip' and the inclusion of Raiga in the manga. In the manner that the field was referred to in past tense, whilst the entire events of Raiga were never mention. Thus a false equivocation was made. Raiga was in the manga, but in flashback it did not involve any events or reference to events of his death in the anime.