Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-45206069-20200317024412/@comment-24824859-20200322010019

InertiaWorld wrote: The really funny thing about this is your definition doesn't even prove your point that complexity is a factor for better taijutsu.

Ever heard of the saying that '''I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practiced one kick 10,000 times.  It's not the complexity that matters, but the mastery''' of the taijutsu techniques that you have that matters. How the fuck do you prove that Part 1 Lee has mastered his taijutsu techniques better than Boruto Era Sakura has mastered hers?

So your definition doesn't even substantiate your point in any way lol. Which means that you can't even prove Part 1 Lee is better than Boruto Era Sakura in taijutsu either way lmao. First of all, it's not my definition, it's the wiki definition. It's the very first sentence in the article. Second of all, more complex moves requires more skills. Not everyone can do the Front Lotus, but everyone can throw a punch.

We're not talking about mastery here, we are talking about skills. All Sakura is good at is punching hard. That doesn't require much skills compared to kicking an opponent multiple times while elevating them to a higher altitude with each kick. So Part 1 Lee has better taijutsu than Sakura

By your ridiculous logic a grizzly bear has better hand-to-hand combat than Bruce Lee simply because it hits harder. I'm done dealing with your ridiculous logic and lack of reading comprehension.