Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-25075055-20140410195636/@comment-1207741-20140513002917

Speysider wrote: No, the reasoning is not flawed. I'm not going to name any names, but there are a few rollback users who would abuse these additional rights if they were granted them Due to the fact that the remove privilege is currently unrestricted, whoever it is you're thinking of is currently able to abuse the privilege. And yet they don't appear to be doing so.

If you are convinced that certain individuals would abuse the privilege, then they should maybe not be allowed rollback rights at all. In the interest of examining their edits and addressing any problems there may be, who are you thinking of?

Speysider wrote: or would have no reason to have them. I don't understand this particular of your reasons. It's a sort of "use it or lose it" philosophy. I haven't used  in ages. Should we create a new group that does not have the privilege so that I don't need to worry about this vestigial privilege of mine?

Speysider wrote: Why give about 20+ users a flag that, at most, 5 people will use? Why create a new group for one or two extremely limited privileges that you, at most, envision 5 people being members of?