Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-45206069-20200317024412/@comment-45173656-20200321214123

UltimaDude wrote: InertiaWorld wrote: My answer to you will always be the same. You should get the gist by now. Like I have said, if you are thinking that what you have provided resembles anything like "feats that prove Part 1 Lee's taijutsu is better than Boruto Era Sakura" then you must be tripping.

I'm asking for feats that prove Part 1 Lee's taijutsu is better than Boruto Era Sakura, not for feats that prove he's a good taijutsu fighter. I don't need you to tell me that, I know that already.

I have absolutely no obligation to answer your question until you prove this.

The horn thing wasn't even addressed to you lol. Try again. How are you not getting this? Sakura has shown not any techniques that are as remotely as complex as the ones Lee performed in Part 1, therefore Part 1 Lee is better at taijutsu. It's your turn to prove otherwise.

So what if it wasn't addressed to me? It's a terrible argument and I can respond to any post as I please. And I'll reply to this since I missed it earlier. You said that Sakura has shown not any techniques that are as remotely as complex as the ones Lee performed in Part 1 therefore Part 1 Lee is better at taijutsu. This is bullcrap because who told you that complex necessarily = better? '''Why did you make that link? This is what I mean by irrelevant feats.''' All you are showing at most is that Part 1 Lee is a good taijutsu fighter. What does that have to do with being better than Boruto Era Sakura? Nothing. Jason of the Mangekyou wrote: I'll consider after you post the claim you're not supporting lmao. I didn't make any claims that I didn't support though lmao. Try again.