User talk:Shelldone

Re: Block
Blocked. Jacce | Talk 06:51, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

.
Where does it say not enough edits is a reason for deletion? And it says "Userpages are for editors to give information about themselves as editors on the wiki; ie: Past wiki editing experiences, what they do on the wiki, and preferred methods of contact" Which i included. Oh and i dont just use talk pages, i edit to try and make things better, i would add new stuff from manga or anime but by the time i watch/read it, someone else has already did it, so i just try to make it better. doesnt it say "Generally, the idea is try to actually contribute to the wiki for awhile first, then after awhile just add something short to detail who you are as an editor." I dont get it, what is the reason for deleting this userpage anyway? does it interfere with anything? do i seriously need like 1000 edits before i can add something as little as this? This isnt vandalism, so why does it even matter?
 * I usually place the deletion tag on userpages for users who have not contributed with at least 100 edits as a vast majority of the user accounts on the wiki are under that number. I also scroll through the contributions to make sure they're helping the wiki and such.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 20:21, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Even though theyre not all editing an article, for the ones that are on talk pages i do try to make the article better. policy says "Commenting on talkpages is not contribution, unless you're seriously contributing to discussions on how to improve articles". Is 20 edits really a big difference to 100? And even so, like i asked before... does it really matter? like its not even in anyones way, it doesnt effect anything. just if someone does come across then they will know something about me. I was going to edit it more, but wanted to start out small just like what the policy says.--Shelldone (talk) 20:31, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * To me it doesn't matter too much as long as the person is actively helping out in the wiki or did so once upon a time. back when I started out on the wiki I got told the same. heck the policy, along with the Talkpage policy, was written after things with me happened.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 20:35, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * but i am actively helping the wiki :(          i visit everyday and monitor the home page. i try to undo revisions that are not good, or edit to make it better. i plan on staying on here for a while though, like i stated on my page, i have been lurking this for a while.--Shelldone (talk) 20:46, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

The Problem
First of all, thank you for deleting the message. Second, I don't really recall any of the cussing situations a "one-time" thing. Either way, I could be wrong if they banned people who cuss, though I did hear Narutopedia say that "Everyone should treat one another nicely." Now that we've co-operated a bit more, maybe we can look eachother at a more friendly way :). Anyways, here's the problem: if Gaara cannot become one of the Main Characters, but he's more important than any other protaganist other than Team 7, then should there be a new way of examplifying the characters in Naruto?: (Example)

1. Main Characters: Naruto, Sasuke, Sakura, Kakashi

2. Main Supportive Characters: Gaara, Sai, maybe Shikamaru and Neji

3. Supportive Characters: The rest of the Konoha 12 and Sand Siblings

I'd like to find out what you think? If you agree, we gotta ask Snapper02 about this. If you don't, then whatever, leave it as is. --- User:Animangalover (talk) 3:35, March 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Honestly what does this have to do with making 'any' article better? This is a wikipedia where we strive for professionalism, if you want to discuss this with people why not try a forum? Anyways, even though the "main supporting characters" you listed have more attention than the rest of the supporting characters, they are still classified as supportive. Like it or not. It's literary terms, period. And I explained to you what supportive character means already. Now you should just let this go.--Shelldone (talk) 23:12, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re: reguarding an edit :3
Because until I see proof of otherwise, I saw it simply as an artistic mistake, not her for some reason or another, for a single panel, having her Byakugan active in one eye, especially limiting herself against a guy who just leveled a city.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 15:01, April 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * Apparently Kishimoto himself handles everything (as far as I was told), so yes it is extremely possible he missed it. There have been other mistakes before, such as when Kishimoto drew Killer Bee with 8 chakra tails, then having Sabu say he had 7. Point is, as far as I see it, prove it wasn't a mistake, then it can be added. Preferably in the Talk Page.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 15:08, April 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * The burden of proof falls upon the accuser. You accuse that it wasn't a mistake, so you must find proof. My proof, is what I see in the chapter. In one panel, her eye was untouched, and then the next panel, there it was.
 * Anyway, yellng at me here isn't going to solve anything. If you want to discuss it, discuss it in Hinta's talk page and have other people chime in on the matter. I told you my reasoning, now wait for others.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 15:26, April 3, 2010 (UTC)