Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20150527125159/@comment-2140588-20150528084054

^Yes. Sure. My biggest nit-pics about this are that: a) This was suggested to be done by an editor who doesn't even plan of doing it himself, as the person doesn't have the time to fix things that he wants to be fixed, but finds the time to unnecessarily encourage people to remove resourceful information. b) Suggested in a way to remove perfectly fine, valuable and resourceful stuff for literally no reason whatsoever, that nobody, for the longest time, had any problems with nor will, most likely, have any problems with in the future.