Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-1251315-20140820175011/@comment-4271790-20140908192008

SuperSajuuk wrote: Of course, if UltimateSupreme was around more and contributing more to the wiki, he'd be disagreed with. But my point is that, because we don't see him as much, it makes him a neutral 3rd party and therefore, he can give his opinion without feeling the need to be drawn into an argument. All I'd like to see is a few more sysops similar to UltimateSupreme who are focused on a specific area of the site, but can jump in and give a neutral opinion without getting embroiled into the discussion. The thing is, according to your first post, you're asking for another admin who is here more often than @Dantman or @UltimateSupreme is. Yes, because they aren't here as much, they are considered neutral. If an admin here more often to given his/her opinion, over time, those opinion will lose their neutrality, since there is always someone willing to argue on this wiki. I'll reiterate, or rather, modify my previous statement: It is a pipe dream for a sysop/admin/crat who is here a lot to give his opinion, and is universally regarded by everyone to be unbiased. If someone is unbiased, like Dantman and UltimateSupreme, they're not here as much. If you give the Bureaucrat flag to someone who is here a lot to give opinions, there decisions will always be questioned, disagreed with, and considered biased. If you want more unbiased users like UltimateSupreme, you're going to face the same issue you have with Dantman: they won't be here as much.