Talk:Matsuri

Title Image
I think the Matsuri's title pic should be her part 2 appearance since her appearance in part 1 was filler.

i know its fillers but its not like its completly randomly made up. she look exactly like that in part 2 but with a different outfit. fillers arent completly unofficial. it's not like the producers making the fillers decided to do something completly different to naruto

Argument
AMTNinja, SuperN, could you please stop the revert war and talk this out? --ShounenSuki (talk 00:26, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The piece he is editting in is pure speculation. I understand what he's saying about a character, few have seen, looking like Matsuri in the game but no concrete proof or anything else to it. Most characters in the Naruto series already look alike and games most definity use the same model dozens of times to save time. ~Super Novice-Talk to Me~ 00:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, still, I wouldn't say it total specualtion, as there are a few concrete coincedences, as to same hair style, clothing and the fact that she's in the sand village. Many games add nudges to real characters and that sand chunin obviously had to be a nudge to Matsuri! AMTNinja 00:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It's still speculation. Narutopedia doesn't support speculation as many pages have had such information removed from their pages before. A picture of said character in the game(with facial view) would dull many oppositions. The community can then decide from there. ~Super Novice-Talk to Me~ 00:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Naruto Ultimate Ninja 4
It says that she was in it at the infobox but on the trivia it says that a person LOOKS like her. It is not confirmed that it is her so i sayit should be removed
 * She might still appear somewhere else in the game. Can anyone confirm? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:43, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

Chūnin?
Seeing her participating in the war, shouldn't she be listed as a chūnin? --OmegaRasengan (talk) 14:24, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, she is a genin unless Kishimoto says otherwise. She wasn't there in the manga.--Deva 27

14:40, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Still, it's not as if the Naruto wiki doesn't take the anime into consideration sometimes (as all the information on filler characters and episodes show). Besides, the talk about her being a chūnin was specifically written to say she's only one in the anime, not in the manga. Also, the description of her outfit in war shouldn't have been deleted; it was just saying what she looked like in the actual episode. If you're going to mention that she was present in the anime episode, you might as well describe the change in her outfit. 74.105.141.44 (talk) 02:27, May 4, 2012 (UTC)A Wikia contributor

We take information from the anime when it doesn't contradicts information from the manga. Manga never said Matsuri was promoted. If this information is to be listed, this should stay in the trivia section until confirmed by the manga. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 03:00, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

I'm for Chunin (anime only) ... this is a different case as Konohamaru because this one is "canon" to anime while the OVA contradicted previous Naruto fillers and and manga--Elveonora (talk) 13:51, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * One I don't think you can enter that value in the rank section- it's a drop down box. Secondly, it is possible that the animators made an honest derp because they wanted the adoring fans to swoon over Gaara and that they didn't pick up in the whole nobody less than chūnin to participate.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 21:16, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

So should we list her as Chunin since she is part of the division ? "_" --Elveonora (talk) 21:44, May 5, 2012 (UTC)