Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-3279282-20150202193413/@comment-1251315-20150202201851

Snapper2 wrote: That's not what I said, or if it is it's not what I meant to say. If there are two pieces of information that contradict each other, the wiki should mention both. What the wiki should not do is decide which of those two is more accurate or, as it sometimes does, contort the information in order to make both true. "Community consensus" should never need to come up. The whole point of a wiki is to reach mutual agreements. If X mentions something, which Y contradicts, the wiki is supposed to discuss the best way forward. A consensus would be everyone placing their opinion and an agreement being reached. Or is it now no longer necessary for consensus on doing anything?