Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-45206069-20200317024412/@comment-24824859-20200321180104

InertiaWorld wrote: You don't get the point, do you? The one that has to first prove such an absurd claim as Part 1 Lee's taijutsu being better than freaking Boruto Era Sakura is you.

Lol imagine thinking that current Shikamaru's chakra reserve being much lower than Part 1 Naruto is in any way equivalent to claiming that Boruto Era Sakura's taijutsu is worse than Part 1 Lee.

Look, I got an idea. Why don't we make a new thread about this and see what other people besides you lot think of this genius idea? I didn't make a claim at first. I asked you a question which you have yet to answer. Sakura has yet to perform any taijutsu that has her on par with Part 1 Lee. Now, answer the question: What taijutsu prowess has Sakura performed that's on par with Part 1 Lee's

Unsurprisingly, the analogy completely went over your head. During Part 1, Naruto had the most amount of chakra in the Konoha 12. Current Shikamaru may have increased his chakra reserve over the years, but it's safe to say that it hasn't surpassed that of Part 1 Naruto's since he has yet to do anything remotely chakra-intensive as making 1k shadow clones. The same is true for Sakura and Lee in taijutsu (though in Part 1, his taijutsu is only second to Neji's).

Here's a better idea; prove that suggesting such a thing is delusional by providing feats. You can emphasize the different eras all you want but, until you show actual evidence, they mean absolutely nothing.