Template talk:Infobox/Jutsu

Are you sure this is well...done?
Because I see the change in the Rasengan page and well...i'm gonna be blunt. Its awful at the moment. It just seems...so out of place. It weems teh pictures don't work, u can't link the users names in the infobox without it breaking (I tried in preview) it just seems...so unfinished.--TheUltimate3 04:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ya, it's some live experimentation. It's not finished yet. I'm waiting for a few caches to expire. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 29, 2009 @ 04:44 (UTC)
 * Images are due to | images = being used instead of | image name =, because of form use I've gotten rid of a lot of old unnecessary parameters. Name linking will be automatic. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 29, 2009 @ 04:53 (UTC)
 * Well if we are testing, wouldn't it be...well better to test in a User page or something. Cause I mean...it just looks so weird.
 * And on a completely unrelated note, is there even a slauight possibility of making the infoboxes well....unique. Take at look at teh Star Wars Wiki, Avatar Wiki, Kingdom Hearts, ect they have unique and interesting infoboxes. Is there a way to give our infoboxes character like that. /shrug giving someone pleasing to look at, even if it's just a infobox will go a long way.--TheUltimate3 05:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I had some example testing... I guess I just can't get to far without doing something live.
 * It looks like I'm going to have some issues with pages like Wind Release: Rasenshuriken. I don't know how I'm going to deal with things like separated jutsu completion info. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 29, 2009 @ 05:52 (UTC)

Canon
Assuming how to tackle anime-only/game-only users is still a problem, would it be simpler to have separate parameters? Like,  , and. They would all be listed together in the infobox, but different things would be done with them; the contents of  would automatically have (anime only) added after them and they'd somehow be magically excluded from non-anime filters. ~SnapperTo 22:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Shippūden
Why is it suddenly Shippuden and not Shippūden? --ShounenSuki (talk 06:54, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
 * Cause I finally got around to realizing that Shippuden has been out under the English title Shippuden for awhile and is no longer Japanese romaji we're using. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Oct 5, 2009 @ 18:03 (UTC)
 * Oh, that's a shame. I was noticing a slight trend towards relying on the Japanese as a primary source and English as a secondary at most. I guess it was false hope... --ShounenSuki (talk 19:01, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Refernces
References, can we just seperate them with a semicolon, and add them without the tags; letting the infobox take care of it? Simant (talk) 18:39, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Kekkei Genkai
I think it needs another arraymap inside the other arraymap to properly process multiple kekkei genkai's. Not sure how to do that. Simant (talk) 23:51, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

2 pictures on Jutsu Infobox
For those techniques with 2 main pictures, I think it would be better for them to show one on top of the other instead of side by side. It would not all the space horizontally and would be better for information presentation.


 * Doesn't it already do that? ~SnapperTo 04:03, October 24, 2009 (UTC)

Jutsu Creator
How about a new section in the infobox — the creator of a jutsu? Like Kakashi Hatake created the Chidori and Lightning Cutter, Chiyo the One's Own Life Reincarnation, Sasori the Human Puppet and Red Secret Technique: Performance of a Hundred Puppets, and Naruto Uzumaki the Wind Release: Rasengan and Wind Release: Rasenshuriken. Yatanogarasu 14:46, March 31 2010 (UTC)

Slideshow
How practical would it be to enable slideshows in the infobox? This:

looks better than this: It's a nice replacement for .gif images. It also reduces the need to find room for five images. ~SnapperTo 17:04, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't be too hard, but i fear people going crazy with 7+ images of consecutive frames. - S im A nt 17:31, June 18, 2010 (UTC)