Talk:The Tale of the Utterly Gutsy Shinobi

When?
in wich chapter does naruto read the book???????????????--189.25.129.191 (talk) 06:42, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * Chapter 416. Jacce | Talk 07:55, November 7, 2009 (UTC)

Title
Shouldn't the other name for it (The Tale of a Gutsy Ninja) be mentioned, I mean, I've only heard it as that, never "The Tale of the Utterly Gutsy Shinobi". -- WhiteArmor  (Talk)  14:26, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * That is the literal translation of the Japanese title. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:50, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Voice Actor?
Should the voice actor who voices Naruto as the gutsy shinobi be added to his info box since the sexy jutsu voice is also there? Or is it useless? --Kai Maciel (talk) 23:17, April 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's technically a different Naruto, so no. ~SnapperTo 02:53, April 12, 2010 (UTC)

Gallery
I thought the rule was no " ", as it is not liked in this wiki. Yatanogarasu 22:55, April 13 2010 (UTC)
 * My take on it is that they should only be used were appropriate and that usually isn't often. The Mangekyō Sharingan page and this one show appropriate times. I could probably see them being used on video game pages if people uploaded a lot of images from the games. ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 05:59, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

New Image
I uploadead this second image of the book...which one do you guys think is better?
 * The shadow is distracting. ~SnapperTo 02:52, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Reference to "vicious cycle of war, blablabla"
Do we really need this reference? The original Wikipedia's article does not refer to the topic discussed in the Narutopedia article. Even though the headline is appropriate, the wiki article is mostly on Macroeconomics and Management and hasn't got even some philosophical sense (or at least it is very subjective). --Tserg (talk) 18:06, April 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what you are getting at...the book was about the vicious cycle of hatred and war. I'm not sure what the Other Wiki has to do with anything.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 21:35, April 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * All right, somebody has already fixed it. I mean that I deleted this reference earlier (from the article) but somebody placed it there again... --Tserg (talk) 05:03, April 21, 2010 (UTC)