User talk:Hakinu

Re: Asuma
I realize that. But if for some inexplicable reason Kishimoto kills off Kurenai before it's born, that will be a family member Asuma never [would have] had. No reason to add a relative that may never come to fruition. ~SnapperTo 23:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Image warnings
Hakinu, take a look over Forum:Image Warning, I've setup some new warning templates for use while tagging, deleting, and reverting images. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 19, 2009 @ 18:15 (UTC)
 * Oh, just so you know. Signatures are integrated into the template, you don't need to sign it. It's better if you don't since a is used at the bottom of the template to avoid images going over other headers. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 19, 2009 @ 19:40 (UTC)

Sysops and userrights
If you see a adress or user that needs to be blocked you can always tell an admin, and he/she will then deside if you are right. The one you reported has been blocked. Jacce 17:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Ah, thank you :] How do I recognize an admin?Hakinu 17:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * One way is to look at this page, where you can see who has what status, or to make it simple: Dantman, TheUltimate3 and I are this wikias admins, Charitwo and TranClan shows up from time to time to look for "cross vandals" (vandlas who are aktive on several wiki). If I remember right they have admin status on every wiki since the work for the basic wiki. AnimeBotSys is a program, or robot, that Dantman uses to change major things, like changes in the code and so on. Jacce 19:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually for proper clarification. TranClan is actually the original founder of the wiki, he abandoned the wiki shortly after creation and I adopted the wiki becoming the founder. I've removed TranClan's sysop flag (though he still has bureaucrat) so that people won't confuse him for an admin.
 * Charitwo is just someone who goes around on a lot of wiki and gets rid of vandalism, he has sysop so he can delete any spam and vandalism he runs into.
 * AnimeBot and AnimeBotSys are my bot accounts. AnimeBot has a bot flag to hide edits, while AnimeBotSys is a sysop instead so the bot can mass-delete pages and whatnot. The sysop account doesn't have a bot flag respectfully so that sysop stuff done by bot like deletions shows up in the recent changes.
 * Me, TheUltimate3, Jacce, and ShounenSuki are the primary admins for the wiki, me being the founder, this is the 2nd or 3rd generation of Narutopedians I've been with (generation being a case where the regular editors have disappeared and a new group of regulars have shown up).
 * I've also given Snapper2 a sysop flag, though he's mostly doing cleanup of stuff around the wiki and I've given him a flag so he can delete junk instead of tagging it for deletion (ie: I'm to lazy to delete all the page he tags ;) heh), though he's avoiding most of the administrative stuff as I suggested. TheUltimate3, Jacce, and ShounenSuki are the one's I've promoted after seeing they have a good understanding of the wiki's policies and guidelines and do good at dealing with the community.
 * For a seeing a list of admins there is Special:Listadmins. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 22, 2009 @ 06:59 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks for clearing that up! Now that I've started going through the pictures marked for deletion (which takes a loooong time @_____________@), maybe I'll make as much work as Snapper did.. heehee. Hakinu (talk) 12:34, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Image
Okay, is this (Four Symbols Seal.jpg) much better? KazeKitsune 18:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, thank you very much! KazeKitsune 19:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Images
Hi Hakinu! I understand why my Ayame picture is tagged for deletion, as there already is one, but why did you put a tag for deletion on the other ones? Just asking, please respond on user talk. --NejiByakugan360 22:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, by the way, please don't bother telling me that images I have uploaded have been tagged for deletion. Thanks a bunch! --NejiByakugan360 22:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC) Keep in touch.

Yes, but please do not sorta throw the news at my user talk, that pictures i have added now have a deletion tag on them. I feel a bit insulted and hurt...--NejiByakugan360 22:55, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

I understand that administrators tell you to inform me, but, see here, that i have uploaded a few pictures without rational, before you have signed up for Narutopedia, and no one notifies me. Please due keep it that way, and delete it without my permission, thats fine. Thanks for informing though, but try not to inform me next time, lol. --NejiByakugan360 22:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Naara
That image is fairly old, not really of any current consequence. Don't confuse what leafninja has copyright over though. Naara was copying actual content from leafninja and posting it up here. Leafninja doesn't have copyright over the images. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 26, 2009 @ 04:52 (UTC)

Re: Marking profiles for deletion?
If you se a user page or a user talk page that dosen't follow the rules, you can ad a deletion tag at the top. Then a admin will decide if it follows the rules or not. A tip is to check this page before adding tags. Jacce 20:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Fair Use Rationale
Ahahaha, my bad... Sorry about not removing the tag thingy, again my bad. Thanks for telling me though, heehee. --NejiByakugan360 15:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Fair Use Rationale Quality
Well, for starting guidelines Forum:Fair use tagging tips... is a good one. I basically noted a bog standard format of a good fair use rationale. I've actually been debating creating some proxy templates that'll let you just specify a few parameters and get a standard fair use rationale for a category of images. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 30, 2009 @ 16:24 (UTC)

Picture bank
We have been attempting to use and, but there are a lot of untagged images. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 7, 2009 @ 17:20 (UTC)
 * Right now both through Property:Character in image using Ask or SearchByProperty or using the "Images containing the character ???" categories. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 7, 2009 @ 17:53 (UTC)

Nindogs
That's something best discussed on the talkpage. To be honest I don't know if things should be split into a Dogs and Ninken page or a combined dogs page should be created. They are in fact different, but there might be reason to put them on the same page. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 7, 2009 @ 21:04 (UTC)

MINATO
Already dealt with him. Side note, could you make sure your signature actually includes your username in it. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 12, 2009 @ 22:49 (UTC)

Re: Byyyyy the way
I don't understand why you made all those dots between the boxes but it is not against the policy. The rest is ok, and you have contributed to the wiki so you are allowed to have a user page. Jacce | Talk 17:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Block
Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:49, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

You may be right, so now I have protected Gato's page. The IP number is blocked to. Jacce | Talk 17:31, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

About Kessie, I left the code for Fair use rationale and gave some tip. If this dosen't work, I guess I have to "borrow" TheUltimate3s Ban Hammer. Jacce | Talk 15:07, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

I see that now. Consider that as the last warning, cause I don't think Kessie is trying to damages the wiki. Jacce | Talk 15:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

The number is blocked and Leech is deleted, but I diden't get the comment. Jacce | Talk 04:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 16:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

I deleted the userpage and blocked him/her for three months. That should give the user a warning, and if it dosen't help, it should be enough info for the next syops to block him/her for good. Jacce | Talk 14:45, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Can't think of a headline
See Category:Candidates for Deletion (No fair use rationale). ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 21, 2009 @ 22:14 (UTC)

Re: Why doesn't it work?
The param is Replaceability, that image page had Replaceable instead.

Image tags are handled through semantics. When you add image tags they add annotations to the image, the image tags template then queries for those annotations to make it's list. As a result there is a 1 parse cache delay between the time that you save the page, and the changes to the list will show up. You can forcefully clear the cache and make it show the updates to you right away by clicking the green refresh (purge) tab beside the watch tab. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 22, 2009 @ 16:28 (UTC)

Picture Delete
I am very sorry for my ignorance, I do not know what is tagging. Sorry for my disturbances. My apologies. I will stop uploading pictures.

Akamaru image
I know you asked Jacce, but I'd like to add to whatever answer he gives. You don't need permission to upload a new image of something. The only reason new images of main characters tend to get reverted is because the old one was better than the new one. Since the current image of Akamaru is terrible, it's unlikely that a new image would be worse. ~SnapperTo 18:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It works. You just need to clear your cache to see the difference. ~SnapperTo 19:34, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Some final points: when replacing an image, Dantman prefers that the new file be uploaded to a new name if it's different enough (ie. it's not just a bigger and/or textless version of the same thing). Also, when uploading a file, the stuff that's put in the Summary box will only be added to the image page if it's a new image. Otherwise it's just an edit summary. Finally, for clearing your cache, you can do it manually. On Firefox it's ctrl + shift + r. I'm not sure what it is for other browsers. ~SnapperTo 19:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

See Narutopedia:Image policy, I updated the image policy awhile ago to clear it up since it was missing from the policy. Unless it's the exact same image of better quality, never upload an image over another one, I unconditionally revert overwrites under that guide. The reason is explained there, it basically boils down to history tracking. There are 2 parts to the history of image pages, the image itself, and the image page where the rationale is. These are not synchronized in any way at all. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 24, 2009 @ 22:21 (UTC)


 * Yup, that's basically the gist of what the guideline says to do. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 24, 2009 @ 23:14 (UTC)

Seams like you got your answer, so the only thing I can ad is: I think the picture came from either episode 44 or 45 (Part I; Chunin exam). Jacce | Talk 04:15, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Just so you know: you don't need to tag unused images for deletion. That's what Special:UnusedImages is for. The only time I ask that you do add the tag is when the image is still in use somewhere (ie. the uploader's talk page, a forum, etc.) since that will prevent it from showing up on the unused list. ~SnapperTo 19:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Killed what I kaught. Special:UnusedImages only updates once a day so there's likely to be some delay with things. ~SnapperTo 03:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It'll be unused once it's obvious the discussion is over. I'm giving it a month to see if anyone even responds. ~SnapperTo 19:00, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Now you has new jobs! Huzzah! Me envy you. ~SnapperTo 18:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Decide if anything can be done with Category:Poor quality images.
 * 2) Figure out why I haven't deleted everything at Special:UnusedFiles.
 * 3) See if each image with a tag actually needs to be deleted.
 * 4) Make sure all of the poor filename files have licensing and a rationale.
 * 5) Examine every image just for the hell of it.

It really never ends, dosen´t it? ;) Jacce | Talk 18:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Now you know how I feel while chasing after pages to be deleted and IP/users to block. Jacce | Talk 18:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

I've actually got most of the Category:Poor quality images coveredAlienGamer | Talk 18:46, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, whenever someone does something, make sure the tag is removed.
 * I require you learn to read my mind... Basically, I haven't deleted them because I like them better than what is currently being used for whatever reason. Or I imagine them being useful.
 * If that was the case then that's my mistake, but some might have a use. I'll look into it.
 * You actually missed a few. Since they only need, I can do that.
 * *<8;O|
 * ~SnapperTo 03:33, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Help
I uploaded a pic of the shippuuden movie bonds...but i still cant get it to go under the fair rational use...help?? AlienGamer


 * o.O....My Bad....thanx for the help AlienGamer


 * Actually, i always do that....i was just in a hurry to send the msg before i got a warning.....AlienGamer Talk


 * And sorry about typin in u'r User Page...i was checkin out u'r fair rational boxes, and i didn't notice i was still under user page AlienGamer | Talk 18:23, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * O.o...didn't notice than :@......my bad AlienGamer | Talk 15:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Comment
This one: "Tricky to find a place where I can put my signature on this one....". Jacce | Talk 12:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Character image tagging
Just so you know, is deprecated, it's actually redirecting to. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 27, 2009 @ 16:46 (UTC)


 * Nah, it just means use instead of  for any new images. I'll consider sending a bot around to fix up all the old uses. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 27, 2009 @ 20:54 (UTC)

Re: Re: Images @ Dantman's

 * Ya, the thing is, the quality goes down quite a lot.....mite be the software i use.....wat do u use?


 * Actually I noticed that u'r 1 of the few ppl who goes around tagging images for deletion, and prob the only 1 in a long time to find replacements for them...just thought i'd help out.....haha...and yes u'r still the master at it :P AlienGamer | Talk 06:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Wait
Actually, I don't know, but I don't think it was to long ago. Jacce | Talk 12:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Ino
I would say that NejiByakugan360's pic of Ino comes from the Chunin exam part 2 preliminarie fights, somewhere in episode 37-41. Jacce | Talk 15:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Old images
It's quite possible for that to be related to your browser's cache. If the image is blown up that basically means that the system already knows about the new image and is using it's size to put the width and height in for the thumb. If it looks blown up, then that means that you aren't viewing the image that the wiki is actually using, likely because you are viewing an old image from your browser's cache. Try clearing your cache to see if the images update. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 28, 2009 @ 16:08 (UTC)


 * This may have something to do with the MediaWiki upgrade, we're finally on 1.14 now, I've filed a note in the forum topic on central. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 28, 2009 @ 16:27 (UTC)

Ino Image
Certainly, if you wish. The picture is from the Chunin Exam Arc, during the preliminary matches. Ino is fighting Sakura, and there is no winner, as they punch each other simultaneously, resulting in a double knockout. Sorry for this inconvenience. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask away!--NejiByakugan360 - Please respond on my Talk Page! 21:57, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, yes the image did appear in that epsode. I think it was about episode 42? I'm not sure.--NejiByakugan360 - Please respond on my Talk Page! 22:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Signature
Oh, okay, i will put the link to my talk page. Thing is, I forgot how to change my signature, meaning i don't know what page to get to... Would you know how?--NejiByakugan360 - Please respond on my Talk Page! 22:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Good Taste! I changed it to how you suggested! --NejiByakugan360 - Please respond on my Talk Page! 14:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:Tenzo's Pic

 * Cause that pic was taagged for deletion, so i replaced it...and now its been deleted....well, i'll try to upload it again, if i find the correct epi...AlienGamer | Talk 19:39, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll Get to it in anothr 45 mins...kinda watchin sumthin important rite now....waititin till it stars...i'll go through epi 35-50, once its done...AlienGamer | Talk 19:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

File:
The Image: was renamed to File: in MediaWiki 1.14. The Image: namespace actually had the capability to handle any kind of file (Images, Audio, Video, etc...) which had an extension enabled for it. So it was renamed to File: since it's actually a File storage, rather than just for Images. It's perfectly fine to still use Image: since we're just using it for images. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 29, 2009 @ 22:08 (UTC)

the picture GufuuSuika.jpg
Image:GufuuSuika.jpg

you go sanding me messages about my poor images when the picture GufuuSuika.jpg is poor and you said its high when some of my picture's like Asuma using Fire Release Ash Pile Burning.jpg was better

Image:dragonfire.jpg

again a poor image and again my's is better don't see you getting bocked

and that's from the real page

RE

 * Wat pissed me off was his reply "I dont know anythin bout copyright laws"...like thats an excuse...i evn gav him a link to the image policy page...he ignores it and just comes bak out....no prob....think nothin of it AlienGamer | Talk 19:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

that was rude
that was rude

don't get it
all the things you tell me i don't get and i got S.E.N too.

Re: File:PainDogA.jpg and PainDogB.jpg
Why not both? File:PainDogA.jpg looks like a good infobox image, and File:PainDogB.jpg looks like a good mid-article image, abilities section perhaps, or appearance. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 30, 2009 @ 22:18 (UTC)
 * Go with the larger images. Leafninja.com is known to edit the image itself in subtle ways, it's possible that the "clearer" look of the images is actually done by modifying the image itself throwing it through some image filters, in the end it's probably not what actually came out of the manga. If it is, then someone can just scan in a higher resolution image for us. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) May 1, 2009 @ 03:15 (UTC)

Re: Imaguz

 * Aite...thanx for the info, but if he knows about it, y rn't they deleted, its not just there for show is it..AlienGamer | Talk 12:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)