Infobox talk:Ten-Tails

Please someone remove "human" species from its infobox.--LeafShinobi (talk) 14:50, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * done.--TheUltimate3 ~Keeper of Lore~ 14:52, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * If I remember correctly, if the species is unmarked, it automatically marks it human. So I just put tailed beast in.--TheUltimate3 ~Keeper of Lore~ 14:54, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's possible to leave it blank by editing the page without using the form, it won't change to human that way. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:56, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Can we unlock it now to add the picture?
I mean, doesn't it need it now?--NaruHina fan (talk) 00:49, April 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm not 100% sure why you are using NaruHina fan, but it will unlock tomorrow. The article will be fine for a few hours.--TheUltimate3 ~Keeper of Lore~ 00:50, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Infobox image
To avoid an edit war let's discuss which image should be used. I'm against the use of the silhouette because it doesn't accurately depict the Ten Tails in it's final form, which was the reason we used the silhouette to begin with, since it was a common assumption that it's final appearance would resemble it. That's what I remember anyways. But now we do have an image of it's true beast form, which works fine in my opinion. Thoughts? --Mandon (talk) 18:26, March 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * I also think the silhouette should have been replaced long ago--Elveonora (talk) 19:30, March 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and change it. I would prefer not a picture where it's just a head and a bunch of chat bubbles, but got ahead. I don't really care much anymore.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 20:01, March 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Reconsidering now, the current image really looks weird. Maybe the silhouette is better after all ._. but it's not correct, that's my problem with it.--Elveonora (talk) 22:06, March 27, 2014 (UTC)

We have a huge variety of images to work with besides the silhouette though. Not necessarily an image of it's original appearance, but his third form from the present timeline comes close enough. --Mandon (talk) 00:00, March 28, 2014 (UTC)