User talk:God-King of Ice Cerberus WereGarurumon/Archive 2


 * And I got the power of rollback and the glorious banhammer. I advise you to think twice before calling me, or anyone for that matter, a faggot. Unless I wasn't clear above, if you don't want things, you archive them. Everything has a use. Hell if you want to be a baby about it I'll do it for you.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 15:50, January 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * See how easy that was? Your talk page is clear and I didn't ban you for a few months.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 15:52, January 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also note, I'm not the only one with the banhammer. Enjoy your cooldown. Read this next one your days off.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 13:23, January 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * To provide another message that you don't want, it's because of this behavior that you were blocked from onepiecefanon wiki. Rather that lashing out because you can't abuse sysop privileges anymore, maybe you should try making constructive edits? ~SnapperTo 19:27, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * The above didn't get archived, as I feel it is an appropriate reminder.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 00:16, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Infoboxes
Please don't speculate whether a person is alive or dead. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:06, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Problems
Please follow the Narutopedia policies and cease revert warring with other contributors. - S im A nt 15:20, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * You can't just archive or erase every single comment. - S im A nt 16:08, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pick
Let me break down your editing habits for you: Individually, these traits are merely irritating. When put together they make for a person that is difficult to sympathize with. Consider the Three Giant Snakes as an example. You say they are dead. Fine. Others say otherwise. Also fine. The problem is that they are providing reasons for thinking so and you are not. You then keep making the same edit. Such has gone on for a month now, and I don't foresee it stopping in the near future.
 * 1) You believe you are correct and act accordingly.
 * 2) When others give their own, differing input, you do not respond.

My point: I am giving you a week to decide which of your tendencies you want to keep. You can believe that you are infallible, engaging people in discussion to prove as much, or you can choose to avoid contact with others, which necessitates you give up on whatever viewpoint you have the moment someone disagrees. If you continue to ignore people and be stubborn when your block expires, you will get a much longer block and I will come to miss your ridiculously long screen name.

In the likely event that you want to archive this the moment you read it, I am also preventing you from editing your talk page so that you might actually consider what I've said. ~SnapperTo 22:55, May 18, 2010 (UTC)