User talk:Dantman/Archive 2

happy Birthday!!!!!!!!
Happy 18th birthday dantman! Random123 22:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

about ghost in shell
so its goining also is the Anime connecting all those wiki progect part of that other ones? Random123 23:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

deleting
U DELETED URSELF!!! y! Random123 01:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

U are weard rabdin 123

Requested Moves
I belive that I moved all of them back to their rightful place. Thanks for trusting me with such an important job. I hope that I did it well. LoneWolf 5 22:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)LoneWolf 5

Me
Hey I'm new to THIS wiki and i need a few pointers ChurchReborn 01:35, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Still nothing new on the Bleach Wiki?
The Bot Request still hasn't gotten through yet?--TheUltimate3 22:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Hm. Understood...got to think of a new plan for Bleach...as far the Infobox I thought they were done. Sorry. If it means anything, the infobox work, may need to be a little smaller but they work.--TheUltimate3 00:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Well thats an interesting change.
Changing Tobi's article to Madara. Wikipedia was fine simply refering to him as his most common name. An interesting change. ^_^.--TheUltimate3 10:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Just a question...
Why are are there two version of the Akatsuki members? I was cuirious as I don't quite get whats going on.--TheUltimate3 02:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, sounds difficult (as now it just seems kinda confusing.) How are we to add the standards of Character Info, (Background, Plot, Personality, Abilities) now?--TheUltimate3 02:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Hm. How about; I try to take the pages as they are now, and slice/dice/move them around to make that format? I can do that most likely with Sasori, Kisame, Itachi, Pein, and Konan. Kakazu and Hidan I didn't actually read their chapters so I'm at a lose there....--TheUltimate3 02:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey
Lets start over.

Im Demonxtro a Naruto wiz. I know most everything about Naruto. Also you should add Youtube widget to the wiki? If you need an ex. has it.

Thx

Re: Images
I will do you one better. I have pretty much every image (with the exception of jutsus I'm afraid) of every character from Naruto. I could upload them one at a time, edit them, and add them to the articles that way. Could that help?--TheUltimate3 05:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Jutsus
I'm at my wits end with this. IP: 194.202.96.100 keeps adding jutsus to the site, nothing wrong there but they are always cut and paste jobs from Leafninja. Forcing me to go through them one by one to fix them to this style. Is there anyway we can either limit the adding of jutsus or something because I've been doing this every day for maybe a week and it is tiring at best, and a great GREAT annoyance at worst--TheUltimate3 16:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * No need to delete them. I think I missed two, but for the most part I converted names, used this sites templates and pretty much more or less went Wikipedia on everyone I could find.--TheUltimate3 01:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Dangit. So your just going to go through the Category and get rid off all the jutsu? And which ones are considered not vios and will be kept Cause I thought as long as they were wikipedia style they were good.--TheUltimate3 01:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The thing is though like I said I think I only missed two techniques the IP made. I pretty much more or less deleted and rewrote all the pages the IP made.--TheUltimate3 01:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Block IP:194.202.96.100 now
He/She posted more stolen jutsu. He obviously isn't looking at the Rule Set. I am going to undo every edit he made today but I suggest you block him.--TheUltimate3 20:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

IP:68.55.103.81
That was me on my main computer. For some reason it logged me off in between pages, /shrug. Anywho, what was the problem with Fire Release: Great Fireball Technique? All my attempted merger was was moving the more complete set of info from Fire Style: Fireball Jutsu to the appropriately named Great Fireball Technique.--TheUltimate3 02:37, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, something was going on with the wiki... I think there was some vandalism at the moment... Dunno... But it looked from the diffs as if a cut&paste move was done... So I merged the histories... ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion Oct 20, 2007 @ 03:33 (UTC)
 * Thats all fine I guess. But could we revert the info of the technique back into the Fire Release: Great Fireball Technique? cause as you can see, it just kinda redirects to itself...--TheUltimate3 04:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Ack, I forgot to set a revision as active after I merged. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion Oct 20, 2007 @ 04:41 (UTC)

Re: Waxo159
Ok...thanks for the feedback ...these means I can keep adding infobox, right?..but obviously I'm going to upload images and edit files..too..and PD: just passing to say hi..

Not to sound greedy or anything of the sort...
But would it be ok if I had the power to delete articles too? A new IP is adding LeafNinja articles (in particular, the Lion's Mane thing), and I expect him/her to keep coming back. So as to save time would it be ok if I had the power to delete articles? A no is completely understandable.--TheUltimate3 21:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Since your gathering images
Would you like some support/aid in this little operation of yours?--TheUltimate3 17:25, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that. Actually I was trying to edit over it. Its just that...Naruto-kun has a tendency to get images that are...of low quality making them hard to make out. Personally I would use Leafninja. Their text is an obvious no-no, but their images aren't owned by them and we use rationals. EDIT:Also Tsunade's healing thing is Creation Rebirth.--TheUltimate3 17:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Land of Waves page
Hey, you sure that the Land of Waves should redirect to the Land of Water? They might be within the same part of the world, but they are two distinct locations: the Waves was a poor nation on the mainland that houses the Great Naruto Bridge in order to encourage more trade to improve its economy. It also does not house a hidden village. The Land of Water is a foggy island that values combative quality, since it is the smallest of the Five Great Shinobi Nations (which is why its village was formerly known as the Bloody Mist). Tell me about why you redirected the "Waves" page to "Water." --Dubtiger 17:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Kimimaro Kaguya is part of the Kaguya clan, which was located in Kirigakure, which does not mention what land it is in and only comments on the Land of Waves, I did a search and found that Kirigakure is located inside of the Land of Water and redirected Waves there cause from looking at the info on Kirigakure it looked like Land of Waves was an alternate name for Land of Water. I came across that when I was adding the titleicons to the Kaguya clan page and needed to know what Land to affiliate the clan to. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion Nov 27, 2007 @ 04:01 (UTC)

Hi
Dantman U ROCK!!! it's like you're the only administrator and U R a KAGE!!! can u tell me what things a chunin can do... it'll take me a long time to get to that level. I'm gonna edit pages like never before and do it better than all the other Genin out there. To be Hokage-that is my dream! P. S. I did what you said.Madara uchiha99 00:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Madara uchiha99

Wikia spotlight
Hi Dantman. As you probably know, this wiki is featured in a spotlight on all of Wikia's wikis right now and for the rest of the week. I'd like to help out with welcoming any new members that might bring in. Do you have a welcome template that you normally use, or would it be okay if I set one up? —Scott ( talk ) 18:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Update
Haku paged is Protected. Talk page at a virtual standstill. Hope is lost. >_<. But seriously I thought the admin should know when a page is protected.--TheUltimate3 02:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The page is neutral now. It can be left unprotected as long as people avoid editing anything to do with gender there. I'm archiving everything stated to date in the gender discussion because people are discussing the completely wrong things and trying to find a solution that does not exist. We're starting from scratch. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion Dec 7, 2007 @ 03:03 (UTC)


 * Thats fine and dandy. I tried to archive it to one of my many Userpages but he kept rv saying it was vandalism. Anyway, so what's the game plan? Believe It won't accept the manga/anime as proof as much as long as it makes sense. Currently as everything SHOULD be in my favor I am at a loss.--TheUltimate3 03:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm archiving the Gender discussion, and the discussions on both of your talkpages to subpages because these discussions are to heated. A new discussion which focuses on the real issue is going to be started on the talkpage, and rather than taking a side, I'm going to act as a neutral party for the point of keeping the discussion focused and civil. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion Dec 7, 2007 @ 03:13 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Also another fair warning. I won't be online at all tomorrow, most of Saturday, and will be working on Sunday. Its a safe bet I won't have time for quick discussions until Monday...maybe.--TheUltimate3 03:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Haku page.
Okay. So where will the discussion be? Will it be in the wikiforum? Also, in case we have to rely on dispute resolution, what admins would be available for that? Is there a list of all Wiki Admins for the Naruto Wiki? Also, not to be a wise guy or anything but when you say "to heated" I think you mean "too heated". I just felt you should know that "too" is used for "also" and for saying things like "too much" or "too bad". --Believe it! 04:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Heh... To vs. Too was always confusing. Meh, at least it's understandable even with the mistake. The list of admins of the wiki is at Special:Listadmins which redirects to Special:Listusers/sysop, but that doesn't help much. TranClan was the previous founder and he abandoned the wiki. I'm the one who adopted the wiki, in other words became the new Founder. And TheUltimate3, who for some reason isn't listed there even though he has the flag is one of the regular users who I ended up giving Sysop to because he was responsible enough to handle the powers. As for dispute resolution, just leave that up to me. I'm still writing the guidelines of the new discussion, one of the stuff there that I have done, but not posted yet is how I'll be acting as more of a neutral admin than engaging in the discussion. The Narutopedia is actually a small community. Off the top of my head, and excluding you, me, and TheUltimate3, I can only think of 3 other active contributors here (^_^ 1 of which I actually had to check the RC for). See Talk:Haku for the pre-discussion note. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion Dec 7, 2007 @ 04:53 (UTC)


 * Oh I've been waiting for this ok Dant. /salute Will do!--TheUltimate3 12:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII DANTMAN!!!
Happy birthday to me! Madara uchiha99 14:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC)Madara uchiha99

Haku Issue
Omg, I don't want to dattebayo that that argument is even happening... My stance: Haku is a boy. On page 12 of chapter 21 "Oh...and...I'm a boy." Also, without fail, Zabuza refers to Haku as "he". Now, it is true that Haku has an androgynous appearance. Nonetheless, whether Haku and Zabuza are lying about his gender or not, we are only given those few circumstances as evidence, and so speculation needs to be put aside. It is a fact that Haku has a very close relationship with Zabuza, it is a fact that they are running from the shinobi hunters, it is a fact that he has lied before...but it is also fact that he claimed to be a boy. If we are going to say that everything he said was a lie, because he lied once, then it could be that he enjoyed a comforatble life with both parents still alive.

Unfortunately, we are not given absolute proof of Haku's gender. But, for that matter, neither are we for anyone except Naruto and Sai's friend, given the various comments that Sai makes about Naruto's vital male organs. After all, this manga is not a pornographic work, nor should it have to be.

So, I would say that in this case, it is truly necessary to go with the character's words on this matter. You should put a note in that says, "Due to Haku's androgynous appearance, and his tendency to lie to protect his identity and Zabuza'a in the past, further coupled with his very close relationship to Zabuza, some fans speculate that Haku may actually be a girl." But no one can reasonably deny Haku's claim that he is a boy, nor should he be referred to as anything but male pronouns in the article.

Sorry for the huge statement. But hopefully my opinion helps you. Jhbartlett 02:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Yup, that's just what Believe it! has been trying to fight against. Stating that because there is no definite proof the article should be completely void of gender references. I like the note, I was thinking of something like it. But it's a little big or... how do I put it... Well I can't explain. But it would make a good addition if we revised it to work better as a trivia note. I guess I didn't state it well enough... I know how most users feel on Haku's gender... But what I was needing a bit more info on was what users thought of how the wiki was being disrupted by Believe it!. He's been reverting good faith edits because they were not gender neutral and pushing his viewpoint that we shouldn't go with the character's words. It's to much for one minor issue and it doesn't look like he's being civil to other community members. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion Dec 10, 2007 @ 02:49 (UTC)

Ok, leaving Believe it! to attack every bit of feedback made there wasn't helping anything at all. There's a section now on Talk:Haku for the community to voice feedback on the article. And Believe it! has been blocked temporarily so that people can add some feedback without worrying about being bitten. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion Dec 10, 2007 @ 03:18 (UTC)

Well, the Zabuza arc is over, Zabuza and Haku are dead, and Haku's gender doesn't matter. (It's not like Naruto's gonna date Haku in the next chapter.) Even so, it's a talk page, and my opinion of talk pages are that disputes belong there. Sure there are disputes about the stupidest things ever, but if Haku is a boy or girl is something to debate then it should be debated. However, it is not something to debate, but even so it is a debate. Even though it is already shown right in front of your very eyes, it's simply fun for people to disprove something. I do agree that it is disruptive, so it should be put in another page because it's not really worth the effort to debate something like the gender of someone like Haku. It's like asking if Sasuke REALLY turned to Orochimaru. I will say this-HAKU IS A BOY!!! He looks like a girl, but he's a boy. Like Deidara. If Kishimoto, the Buddha, or Rikudan-sennin yelled out from the heavens, "HAKU IS A BOY!!!!" then there would be no debate. That is my opinion. Madara uchiha99 01:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Madara uchiha99

Narutopedia.eu
Hi, i'm the owner of narutopedia.eu. I wrote you an e-mail.--87.174.158.55 18:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Userboxes
Would you mind making an italian babel box because i speak it Madara uchiha99 23:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Madara uchiha99

And I wouldn't mind you telling me pages that you're too busy to edit and i can edit them for you as best as a Genin can. Madara uchiha99 23:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Madara uchiha99


 * Bleh, syncing is out of commission right now. And it takes a bit of work to add another language to the Babel template because of the categories needed. But I added it to the master talkpage's list of languages to add to the box. Edit any article, anyone edits anything... I don't even have a specific set of articles I'm trying to add. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion Dec 14, 2007 @ 03:36 (UTC)

Jiraiya
Jiraiya dies.... :( i wuv jiraiya Madara uchiha99 12:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Madara uchiha99

My page
Go to my page, Dantman! it's really cool. everyone else should go there too. Madara uchiha99 14:18, 23 December 2007 (UTC)Madara uchiha99

Re: New users copying from other sites
Interesting because from what I have seen and with a little help from someone else, NarutoFan was a sespool of fan wank to an epic degree, and while Leafninja isn't we simply can't use their info because its a website thats still upgrading. Very well, I'll get to it.--TheUltimate3 11:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Alright evaluation time. The Konoha Police Force doesn't appear to be stolen, just badly written. No need for a deletion I think, just needs to be worked on. Forehead Protector again appears to be one that needs serious work, but no need for deletion. Ninja Academy again just looks like something that needs uber work. And Seven Swordsmen of the Mist. In short, they really just need serious work. The people who added them made like fanboys really, so they have a real PoV issue but they all just need work.--TheUltimate3 03:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Hokage Links
Just so we don't have a little edit war on this thing, the reason why I linked the First Hokage and Second Hokage to Hokage#First Hokage and Hokage#Second Hokage because those or the only sections we have on the two, and there is far little info on them to warrant their own articles unless they were to be stubs. Just explaining myself is all. Thanks.--TheUltimate3 11:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Hokage Links
Just so we don't have a little edit war on this thing, the reason why I linked the First Hokage and Second Hokage to Hokage#First Hokage and Hokage#Second Hokage because those or the only sections we have on the two, and there is far little info on them to warrant their own articles unless they were to be stubs. Just explaining myself is all. Thanks.--TheUltimate3 11:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)