Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-31338621-20190129080042/@comment-9782468-20190204144109

FlatZone wrote: If that is what you call countering points then you two need to re-evaluate it. Either we are allowing plot induced characterizations and results or we are not. Which is it? Minato could not kill A or B and that's that. He was smarter and faster than them, and had FTG and that was it. If he had had the capability to kill them he would have.. same way he slaughtered all those Rock Ninja. Minato's character is to kill his opponents and he has ALWAYS done that, or attempted to do that. Why would A and B be the exceptions considering they were clearly trying to kill him? They are not. You guys remind me of the DBZ vs thread guys wayyy back who used to say that since Goku had Instant Transmission he could never lose.. come on now stop the Minato wank already it's getting really old. Uh, no. Nothing indicates Minato could not kill A and B, so it's not "that's that." All the evidence you had is he didn't kill them, yet I gave you many examples of people who could kill people who they should've killed, but didn't. You have no actualy evidence, but you try to give your assumptions based on faulty evidence and pass them off as ironclad facts. It's amusing, but wrong.