Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-24577388-20150224012723/@comment-27082825-20150225180703

I never stated that they have tailed beast abilities. In fact, one of my posts state directly otherwise so "he has the whiskers = they have kyubi ablities" isn't even the argument. Aside from Kisame and Kakuzu, (The former probably being as you say and the latter doesn't really have animalistic traits) all those you listed have an explination. Naruto's whiskers irrefutably originated as a simple trait, but as the story evolved, logic within the story suggests this, which you stated wasn't even alluded too. ("it is no where stated that the whiskers have anything to do with the kyubi or someone that gained part of its chakra, so we cant use the whiskers as argument) Not the case as I disproved this. So please. I understand its fiction but you're trying to over-simplify it and it is indeed irritating. I understand unintentional, but irritating nonetheless.