User talk:WindStar7125

Re: Naruto and COAT
He used YYR, not Coat, according to Suzaku's translation. • Seelentau 愛 議 17:47, February 21, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Deletions
I figured that having a "X (disambiguation)" redirect wouldn't be as effective as just a "X" redirect. I was going to redirect "Team Ten" to that disambiguation page, but it already redirects to "Team Asuma". Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:26, February 22, 2015 (UTC)

re: filter
I'll poke UltimateSupreme to update the filter to exclude rollbacks. :) --Sajuuk talk 09:02, February 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * The filter has been updated :)
 * Regarding the colours, it's like that for everyone. We are part of some private test for feedback purposes.
 * I agree that it is very annoying, so please leave feedback about it here (I see you left a bit of feedback). --Sajuuk talk 21:01, February 24, 2015 (UTC)

U. Gi. O.
Basically, what happened is that notification rules were violated, but, others made excuses to list it like that from now on. I was contacted by the head of the wiki for reverting the edits and I said that making an excuse for a one-time thing is not worth it, he didn't like what I had to say about it and threatened to ban me if I don't stop reverting the unneeded edit. I noted him that threats about banning for no reason aren't scary to me and he banned me for harassing him, which I clearly did not do. After a month I dared him to ban me again (yes, it was ballzy of me) and he did it indefinitely. Sorry if this message is long, If you were interested you could've just asked sooner.. I promise this won't in any way interfere with my edits here.--Omojuze (talk) 11:09, February 25, 2015 (UTC)

lol
lol. That made me laugh ;) --Sajuuk talk 15:25, February 25, 2015 (UTC)

part 1 filler ?
Can I ask what the source is for changing every one of the filler arcs in part 1? --Sajuuk talk 10:48, February 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * He gives no source for where he found that data. And I don't think he was inviting any user to go and actually change it either. Especially as you can see that the link was pointing to the wiki's title, with different display text. For all we know, that might not even be the official names, since some of them don't make sense at all. --Sajuuk talk 18:30, February 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't even remember the source he gave. I know you want to be consistent, even I want consistency, but... yeah. :P --Sajuuk talk 18:46, February 26, 2015 (UTC)

Not to my knowledge. ~SnapperTo 18:00, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Six Paths Chakra
You're awesome...was following you simultaneously :D...thanx for your immediate response...really appreciate your sense of responsibility star :] --DARK ZERO--talk 22:58, February 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * at least U bothered to consider our discussion...not just put it behind your head...I'm grateful for it. --DARK ZERO--talk 23:11, February 26, 2015 (UTC)


 * Howdy coboy...sry, had 2 other questions regarding the databook...


 * 1. Is will materialization classified as a yin-yang release...or a rinnegan KG...or nuthin at all...


 * 2. Is 6 paths sage tech classified as senjutsu & fuinjutsu... --DARK ZERO--talk 12:36, February 28, 2015 (UTC)


 * bump... --DARK ZERO--talk 11:18, March 1, 2015 (UTC)


 * then I'll try suzaku...thanx for replying mate ;] --DARK ZERO--talk 07:01, March 2, 2015 (UTC)

Threads
why the hell should i listen to you and not block pages...?? i am as much a chat moderator as you are... Sage Minato (talk) 15:10, March 2, 2015 (UTC)

re: Daniel Bailey
I know he is. But none of the sysops seem to care for indefinitely blocking him. I advised they did so before and it was not done. --Sajuuk talk 08:56, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Eight Gates
The eight gates are eight gates. They are not a technique or anything, they're just stuff in the body, like the tenketsu or the heart. The Eight Gates Release Formation is this. • Seelentau 愛 議 12:23, March 3, 2015 (UTC)
 * mmh, basically, yes. The state of having the 8th gate opened is that technique. The eight gates in itself are not a technique, if you wondered why I removed the Kinjutsu label. • Seelentau 愛 議 00:23, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * That's not what I said. • Seelentau 愛 議 00:57, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * Not at the same time, but in order. After you reached and opened the eighth gate, you're in that state. I wonder if you could open only the eighth gate, though... • Seelentau 愛 議 01:09, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

By the way, I forgot about "Hachimon Tonkō". According to the databook entry for Hirudora, it exists and apparently is the state of having one or more gates opened, up to the eighth, which is then called "Hachimon Tonkō no Jin". So basically, Hachimon are the gates, Hachimon Tonko is the state of having them opened and Hachimon Tonko no Jin is the state of having the eighth gate opened. Does that sound viable? • Seelentau 愛 議 20:27, March 5, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Asura and YYR
Weren't the powers he gave his sons just the body/eyes stuff? YYR was never mentioned. • Seelentau 愛 議 01:39, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * On the last page, you mean? By that logic, Ashura must've had all the feats Naruto and Sasuke gained, meaning Rinnegan, TSB, YYR, Six Paths Senjutsu mode. Which is not the case. Hagoromo is really just talking about power: First it was only Ashura who had power (as the head of Ninshu), and now it's Naruto and Sasuke who have power. • Seelentau 愛 議 01:53, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * No idea why that, either. I mean, it makes sense, seeing how they basically represent Yin and Yang, but since it's not confirmed... • Seelentau 愛 議 02:01, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * It isn't, but we can't say it for certain, either. It's a shame that the databook didn't elaborate on this. :/ • Seelentau 愛 議 02:33, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Proving a point
First and foremost, no disruptive behavior was happening, I did not create an article and nominated it for deletion, I politely voiced my opinion on this matter in the talk page. Needless to say, it's only my opinion and the article needs to exist, at least for now, like it's predecessors that I've listed in the talk page. And also, to put it all shortly, taking it to the respective talk page is a better way to make people notice the (issue?) than in the forums.--Omojuze (talk) 05:41, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are suggesting the whole deletion of the Shrinking Technique page, there was a talk page post in there, but nowadays, it is somehow really hard to get a rational response. An editor suggested deleting it, I agreed. Nobody put in any of their thoughts in the talk page, and there was time to do so, so that's why i nominated it for deletion.--Omojuze (talk) 13:41, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * Whether I asked or not, the article should've still been created, following the other examples, and I did just that. Guess asking a question/raising a topic for others to see in the talk page is a crime now. Good to know.--Omojuze (talk) 14:03, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * And I do understand what you're trying to say. Yet it's not like I created an empty article and then got raged in the talk page about its creation.--Omojuze (talk) 14:04, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not like I tagged all unnamed genjutsu for deletion. I politely took it to the talk page to discuss this. If nobody will agree with me, I won't throw a tantrum or anything. I did nor will I do something of the sort and I don't really feel like I did anything of an issue here. I read what you've sent me and if I hadn't included the words "created in the purpose of proving a point", everything would've been fine. But, the article, as of the things we currently do, is not for debate for deletion. Pal, you just blew this out of proportion, but It's ok, I think I need to be more careful about what I say because I can be misunderstood.--Omojuze (talk) 14:35, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

My Talk Page
WindStar, you use the Wikia skin, don't you? Do you mind going to my talk page for me and telling if it's working? 'Cause on my side, it isn't. The link on the bar that shows my username, my talk, preferences, watchlist, etc... Well, the talk is became a red link and when I clicked on it, it leads me to Message Wall:NinjaSheik, which doesn't exist. I don't why mine isn't working while I'm able to access your talk page just fine. EDIT: Oh, wait! If I access my talk page through my watchlist, I'm able to get my talk page, but the link on the bar is still red. Strange...-- Ninja Sheik  04:22, March 5, 2015 (UTC)
 * That is a bug due to the Wikia update. A change was unintentionally made that changed all the links to Message_Wall: if the forum module was enabled. It was already reported to Wikia and should be fixed soon. --Sajuuk talk 09:10, March 5, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, thank you, SuperSajuuk, for telling me! WindStar, mine is still not working properly. :( Guess I'll have to wait. Thanks, guys~! :)-- Ninja Sheik  21:17, March 5, 2015 (UTC)
 * Still red, unfortunately. :( I'm just going to have to wait it out.-- Ninja Sheik  23:52, March 5, 2015 (UTC)
 * Correct! The URL still exists, and I can get into it by accessing it by, for example, click on the History tab and find my username and click on the link to my talk page. But whenever it up on the bar, it's red. Geez, I hope this gets fixed soon.-- Ninja Sheik  04:28, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll contact them about it first before changing over. Thanks for the assist! :)-- Ninja Sheik  23:38, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know. :) It's been fixed since yesterday.-- Ninja Sheik  23:36, March 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * This sounds rather urgent. I can't do it tonight, but tomorrow definitely. What's this about?-- Ninja Sheik  00:46, March 13, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm on the Chat now. Are you available now?-- Ninja Sheik  01:23, March 14, 2015 (UTC)

Signature
Your signature is quite long, in many cases twice as long as whatever comment you're making. The wiki has no restrictions on sig length, but there are nevertheless reasons not to have a long signature. Please consider simplifying it. ~SnapperTo 18:24, March 5, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Been meaning to ask this for a while
uhm... don't we translate senjutsu? I assumed it. • Seelentau 愛 議 00:41, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Well then, why're you asking? :P Kidding aside, I don't know why we translate it. I translated it because I'm the translator, but that mustn't mean that we definitely have to use that translation. • Seelentau 愛 議 01:16, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * No no, by any means, go ahead and make the changes. • Seelentau 愛 議 01:41, March 6, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Six Paths Senjutsu
Thanks for bringing that up again and changing it. The inconsistent "Sage Technique" translation was bothering me for a while now.--BeyondRed (talk) 02:44, March 6, 2015 (UTC)

Re: TSB and Expansive TSB
Well, since "parent technique" is a term that fans made up, and thus can be changed by fans, it can be either way. • Seelentau 愛 議 12:50, March 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * No idea. I only know that the lack of set guidelines does more harm than good. • Seelentau 愛 議 18:09, March 7, 2015 (UTC)

Edits
Windstar what happened to my edits And i dont know how increase my value Thekng123 (talk) 21:42, March 7, 2015 (UTC)

Are you the guy that keeps Changing my edits Thebest423r (talk) 02:46, March 8, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Moderator to Mod
Eh, I just wanted to shorten it for no particular reason. People can hover over the text to find out what it means. :P

On another note: they're gonna be adding a user preference to disable syntax highlighting on the classic editor, which is good news imo (I've loathed seeing it and it doesn't help me at all :D) --Sajuuk talk 20:59, March 10, 2015 (UTC)

re: infinite
You should know why I chose to make it clear it would be infinite. She has a lot of blocks to her credit, unimportant and pointless edits, tons upon tons of warnings to stop making such edits (which she has demonstrated to not give a toss about and continues) and repeatedly edit warring with every editor when other editors correct her bad editing practices. She is just simply inventing jobs because she can't legitimately contribute to the wiki and the wiki should not need to put up with it anymore. In my experience, threatening an infinite block from a wiki usually gets people to actually seriously consider whether they're helping or hindering the project: I don't like the idea of infinitely blocking users, but if it has to be done, so be it. --Sajuuk talk 21:59, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * While sockpuppetry and constant vandalism are indeed reasons for infinite blocking, regular users who are not vandals but just constantly cause work for the wiki despite a huge number of warnings can be infinitely blocked.
 * While it's generally advised to educate users, Kunoichi101 shows absolutely no intent on giving a shit for constant warnings. You can see that she constantly causes work for other editors and floods the page histories with unnecessary edits. These warnings are a waste of editor's time and we would do a lot better not having to constantly educate her on her terrible editing practices.
 * Hell, if I kept making bad edits, I would expect an infinite block if I was ignoring editors. It can happen to anyone for any reason. --Sajuuk talk 22:07, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * i have a feeling that you two are talking about me. did i really make a bad mistake just because i would be blocked forever? just saying Kunoichi101 (talk) 23:01, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Narutopedia:Sysop_Requests?diff=1025476&oldid=1025467 sigh "What exactly about her edits are bad?" said TheUltimate3. I feel stupid after someone thinks that my edits are bad for no reason. of course i really got blocked sometimes back then, but doesn't Sajuuk really mean it? Kunoichi101 (talk) 01:39, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * ok, maybe i'm really ignorant for the past years and true I really want to help, but even though i did agrue with the others like the colors of the forehead protector and know it's kinda irritating for me to notice some stuffs like an image near a detailed summary not atop of it. sigh and i was told that i may make a poll after two weeks if it's old or something. sigh so much for the warnings. maybe Sajuuk really hates me for that many reasons. Kunoichi101 (talk) 02:39, March 12, 2015 (UTC)

re: poweruser
It is just an identifier for Wikia to know who are active on wiki's, which will allow them to target surveys and other things at them (to find out exactly what can be done to improve their experience on such wiki's). It confers no rights or benefits though and is currently very experimental. --Sajuuk talk 09:51, March 14, 2015 (UTC)

Re: LoZ
It's pretty late in my timezone now, so I give you the gist of my list in a few words as possible. :)

1.) Twilight Princess - LOVED EVERYTHING ABOUT IT! Storyline, graphics, characters, bosses, everything! Midna, Zelda and Link (love his wolf form!) are beautiful, and Midna has become one of my all time favorites!

2.) Skyward Sword - Graphics are second best, and I loved how it ties together the overall history of the series! Plus, they brought back Impa, and I love Fi!

3.) Ocarina of Time - My brother played this game when I was a little kid, and it was the first game I ever saw, so it holds a special place in my heart. :) Plus, I love Sheik, and the concept of "Sheik" is something I always loved!-- Ninja Sheik  04:16, March 15, 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I can't answer that question. ^___^; I never played the game myself. Ever since I was a kid, I always watched other people play games Be it my older brother, my cousin, or walkthroughs on online.-- Ninja Sheik  21:59, March 15, 2015 (UTC)

Yep. I was always more of a watcher than a gamer. The Cave of Ordeals? Isn't that the part of the game where you can reach the Great Fairy?-- Ninja Sheik  03:17, March 16, 2015 (UTC)

Lol, it's fine. :)-- Ninja Sheik  22:41, March 16, 2015 (UTC)

chat
Get on chat if you can. Need to talk about something. --Sajuuk talk 21:09, March 17, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Talk Page Formatting
Thanks. Munchvtec (talk) 11:46, March 19, 2015 (UTC)

Uchia clan massacre anime and manga versions (chapters 590, 619)
I thought I would leave this message here in the talk page as well. I think that the anime and manga material on the Uchia massacre should be clearly separated. For example, in chapter 619, the Third Hokage, when questioned about the Uchia incident, said "*We* ordered him to kill his clan... so he slaughtered his entire clan to prevent the coup, and in doing so stopped an even greater bloodshed that would have ensued". He continued to repeat "we", including himself. That's exactly the version given by Tobi, implying that both the Hokage and the Council were involved (it also conflicts with Itachi's flashback in chapter 590 because it adds "with the lone condition that I keep his brother from harm": this is like Tobi's version of the events, and differs from Itachi's version in which Danzo was the one making the offer). Also, he seemed to take the position that the coup was indeed beyond the possibility of resolution by peaceful means (which was Shishui's own position, *before* the encounter with Sarutobi and the elders: this is not made clear in various articles, and in particular in some instances this encounter with Shishui is presented before the talk with the council and Danzo, while in chapter 590 it happened afterwards). In any case, this point on the situation is made repeatedly and rather explicitly in the manga: in chapter 590 by Shishui first, and by the Elders and Danzo second, and in chapter 619 by the Third and Second -in particular, the Third's words seem to suggest an additional encounter in which both he and the Elders asked Itachi to go through with the plan-. This differs significantly from the view expressed in some articles that a diplomatic soultion would have been viable but was not tried, or that the massacre didn't really serve to avoid a world war, but was only a whim of Danzo. I think that Sarutobi's words in chapter 619, in particular, should make this a rather moot point as far as the manga is concerned (the anime apparently follows another plotline in which the Third's role in the events and assessment of Itachi's actions differs significantly from the Third's position on the fact that Itachi's contribution had been essential to prevent an unavoidable massacre, expressed in chapter 619). This obviously conflicts with the anime version of the events, but this distinction is not explained well in a number of articles (Danzo, Sarutobi, the ones on the Uchia/Uchia curse of hatred/Uchia's downfall/etc., as well as http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/A_Clan_Possessed_by_Evil, the chapter's plot). I should again stress that the picture presented by Kishimoto in chapters 590 and 619 in particular (which also see a consensus on the issue by the Third and Second) differs significantly by the one presented in the articles above (incidentally, the parts on the Uchia military police in some articles present only the Uchia side of the situation, ignoring the facts presented by the Second in chapter 619, as well as the fact that apparently the dojutsu produced paranoia and overreaction -such as Madara choosing to use a Biju in two occasions when he didn't get his way, which adds weight to the Second's position about their instability, the so called "curse of hatred"-). In the anime the plot might be different as far as the Third's role and assessment of the events (I didn't watch it, so I can't really tell), but if that's the case, the difference with the manga canon material should be made explicit, rather than having everyting jumbled together, or even not discussed (some articles link to chapters 590 and 619, but don't actually present the view expressed, even in the case of the very article on chapter 619).--Melvin62 (talk) 14:05, March 20, 2015 (UTC)--Melvin62 (talk) 14:08, March 20, 2015 (UTC)--Melvin62 (talk) 14:08, March 20, 2015 (UTC)

re: pointless edits
Ignoring the text wall above this post, yes those edits are unnecessary. I'm not really sure why Omnibender does those kind of edits, it's sorta encouraging users like Kunoichi101 to keep on making such edits themselves. I'm quite busy at the moment, so feel free to ask Omnibender why he's doing it. --Sajuuk talk 20:44, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Nah, you ask him and I'll watch his response and jump in after ;) --Sajuuk talk 20:47, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * I left him a message. Also, join chat if you can ;) --Sajuuk talk 21:34, March 21, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Chat
Thanks for the link! --SSJ2AJB (talk) 22:42, March 22, 2015 (UTC)