Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-1251315-20141013163204/@comment-1251315-20141201154002

Marc Zaddy wrote: That was my legitimate reason, I'm neutral to it because I do not care if he's promoted or not. How is this not responsible?? You asked for a response, I gave you one. Because it's not a reason. It's like you posted just for the sake of posting, you don't care if he becomes a forum op or not. That is not a valid reason: a valid reason would be to explain your vote with evidence, but just posting "Neutral: I don't give a crap" is not worth anyone's time and already violates at least two stated rules in the OP. Here, I'll quote them to save you scrolling up: If you don't believe the user needs these extra permissions please do NOT vote for them as a Forum Operator. When voting in support or oppose, you must give a valid reason for your vote. Votes consisting of "What X said" or no reasons being given will not be counted and will be removed from the thread Instead of trying to explain your vote, you essentially wrote "I don't care", which won't be accepted as valid reasoning. Hence your post was removed. If you are neutral, then simply don't post at all and ignore the discussion instead of just posting for the sake of it.