Talk:Hiding with Elemental Technique

necessary?
Do we really need this? We already have "hiding in" techniques like "mist, water, rock, mole, rain" as elementary examples. Wouldn't it be better to make "hiding in fire" and "hiding in shadow" etc.?--Elveonora (talk) 01:34, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

I also thought that.98.26.246.74 (talk) 01:41, November 2, 2012 (UTC) yomiko-chan

That, definitely. They should be discussed here before actually being made. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:54, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

I'm for a deletion and recreation separately. Not to mention it contains speculation with "may be passed" thing.--Elveonora (talk) 02:07, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Delete and create separate one. However ridiculous hiding in fire might be, at least it will follow a "trend" with articles.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 11:41, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

We saw four of the five members showing up with such techniques. First came out of the way, with something like a merger of Hiding with Camouflage Technique and actually phasing through the wall. I think it's safe and convenient to assume it's that technique with a different animation. Second guy appeared out of the shadow of the first guy. Probably new technique number one: Hiding in Shadow Technique. Third guy appeared out of fire, new technique number two: Hiding in Fire Technique. Ideally, I'd consider merging that with Body Flame Technique: that was used to vanish, this was used to appear, they probably function the same, but all the "Hiding with" techniques that use an actual elements end up being nature transformation techniques, and I have no intention of adding Fire Release to Kabuto and Orochimaru just because of this. Last guy appeared out of water, and we already have a page for Hiding in Water. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 15:07, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, yes and yes... but NO. For the 999999th time, "Body Flame Technique" was a genjutsu--Elveonora (talk) 17:15, November 2, 2012 (UTC)