Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-27082825-20150116155842/@comment-4366149-20150121081209

Addendum to my above post:

It is also possible for someone to equally lean the most towards two aspects of any specified category. So using that argument is problematic.

Seelentau wrote: NoJutsu, I just think that you're applying waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much real life logic on Naruto, which makes discussing with you no fun. Kinda.

I know the definition of affinity, but as I said, that word wasn't used anywhere as far as I researched. They always talk about the nature someone leans to, their disposition.

Of course I have, but if that would happen, it would defy the meaning of the paper and also render it unusable as a plot device. If the paper got wet and cut, how would've Kakashi known which nature he had to teach Naruto? I've never applied real life logic in any of our discussions. I think you're confusing classic principles of logical argument with "real life logic". These things hold true in ANY logical discussion.

But nothing prescribes that it is impossible to lean the most toward two natures.

Assuming that happened, this thread wouldn't exist. But nothing prescribes that it cannot happen.