User talk:WindStar7125



Welcome to my talkpage. Please remember to sign your comments by typing four tildes (~) or by clicking on http://www.wikia.com/skins/common/images/button_sig.png from the toolbar.

Re:Mangekyō Sharingan
My reasons for removing it was in my edit summaries. Their obtaining the Eternal Mangekyō Sharingan and the Rinnegan has nothing to do with them having straight tomoe. It's just junk information tacked onto actual information.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 03:39, October 19, 2014 (UTC)

You don't need to say again. You are leaving a message on a talkpage, not a snapchat. You are right though: in that trivia, the mention of the Manekyo Sharingan's involvement in the shape manipulation shouldn't be there any at all. We don't know if the type of eye affects shape manipulation whatsoever. All we know is that they're the only ones to use it.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 03:49, October 19, 2014 (UTC)

That's what I intended to do. The straight tomoe bit is already on the article, so it doesn't need to be in the trivia.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 02:29, October 20, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Advice
I may not be able to hop on the chat, but feel free to post your question on my talk page. I'd be happy to help.~ Ten Tailed Fox 18:10, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * Your response was level. I didn't see anything wrong with it. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Rinnegan Sasuke.svg 22:28, October 19, 2014 (UTC)

696 Colored
The official colorings of 696 have been released- here's the link:. I don't have the best technology for replacing the images, and I didn't know who else to give this link to, so here you go. --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 03:10, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, someone else has already uploaded them... --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 03:13, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks- I had been planning to archive my talkpage for awhile now... --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 20:25, October 20, 2014 (UTC)

hey
sorry for the late response but i appreciate your input on my rollback request ty. Munchvtec (talk) 11:39, October 20, 2014 (UTC)

Could you give me a link to a page that shows all the warning templates and how to use them? Munchvtec (talk) 12:59, October 20, 2014 (UTC)

Im not determined at all really and i have only asked twice but i don't like to count my first request as legit since it was childish. I wanted rollback so i could help the wikia to my highest degree. Munchvtec (talk) 11:49, October 21, 2014 (UTC)

I understand and thank you. Munchvtec (talk) 11:59, October 21, 2014 (UTC)

Chat
Hey Windy, I'll be in chat for a few hours, like to talk about something when you get the chance. :) --Sajuuk Talk Page 17:35, October 20, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Naruto Answers
You have to understand me from a certain point. Back in the days when I was much more active, you could see "this is not a forum" at least a couple of times a day. I guess that's where my initial response comes from. I guess I have not yet fully accepted the concept of discussions turning focus away from the editorial work, particularly because in my opinion forums represented a kind of taboo topic for longer period of time.--Vecanoi (talk) 05:50, October 21, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Revolution Trivia
I don't know why you're making a big deal out of it! Play the game yourself and you'll see that it's true! I'm not edit warring! SSJG Yusuke (talk) 04:35, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Reminder
Thanks KazeHoshi-san, I don't write the summaries of the episodes by the way. But I can edit and correct them when that happens. And yeah, you're absolutely right. — Shakhmoot  (Talk) 11:21, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

Naruto 697
.....I wasn't referring to links in general -__-  Yeesh.... --Hisana456 (talk) 11:36, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * OK :) --Hisana456 (talk) 12:31, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

No sources
I have found another few tidbits of new information for Naruto--- that of a new design that I don't recognize (indra/asura/indrasura)--- but unfortunately, this time I have no sources. It looks like it's from the website, or from a film poster. But, I have no confirmation for these things. Is it still okay to upload under the Fair Use--- film poster--- thing? --Plane in the Desert (talk) 04:05, October 24, 2014 (UTC) Plane in the Desert

Nevermind about the images, someone else was kind enough to upload the photo I had in mind. Thanks anyway :) --Plane in the Desert (talk) 03:31, October 25, 2014 (UTC)Plane in the Desert

It was the one of the new villain. Here's the thread containing the pic (though I think there are different versions of it all over the wiki recently. Might be wrong about that.), http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:147396#64. So yes. If I find anything else, I'll upload/leave a message :) Plane in the Desert (talk) 18:50, October 25, 2014 (UTC)Plane in the Desert

re:
I was going to respond to your previous comment, only you archive your talk page so quickly and I decided what I was going to say wasn't worth a new heading.

What I think I was going to say was that the arc modifications aren't drastic enough that I felt articles needed immediate updating. They're inconsistent with the wiki's main articles, yes, but readers and even contributors aren't likely to notice that fact since those articles aren't linked to. So it was a conversion I was slowly going to perform in the course of making other edits.

And now I feel bad that you've done all the work by yourself. I appreciate your effort and will assist with missed articles if and when I come across them. ~SnapperTo 07:33, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

Tailed Beast genders
We have already added them--Elve Talk Page 15:46, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

Their infoboxes. There was a topic and a decision was made to add them, there were 3 days for people to voice their disagreements and no one said a thing--Elve Talk Page 15:50, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

No one bothered to change it I guess. Also non-human animals are often called "it" disregarding their sex--Elve Talk Page 15:57, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

Yes? You say "it is a dog" or "it is a cat" not he or she, unless it's your pet and you have emotional attachment to it--Elve Talk Page 16:00, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

Discussion
I resent the fact that my comments were edited/removed and hers were not.

This is seriously annoying and disrespectful.

I get it, it was overboard. But her comments were just as bad and anyone who actually reads through them will see them for what they are. Blaezej (talk) 19:17, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I just figured how to properly add a signature. Anyways, You're mad because I came to your talk page? I can understand a message, specially Elveonora's regarding the "take it to her talk page", but I have nothing else to say to her. On the other hand, I found it unfair of you to edit/remove my comments while leaving hers intact. I'm not saying I'm right, I admit I was also wrong, but only me being reprimanded was seriously annoying. That was all. Blaezej (talk) 19:26, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

And why the hell would she complain? She had the final word. And even my previous comment was deleted! And either way, she said she was sorry to Elveonora. She didn't come and say "well, maybe we were overboard" or whatever the hell was the case. My point is, she blatantly calls me dumb and you guys do nothing.

That's what I'm pissed off about. That is all.

EDIT: You guys do nothing except to remove my comments, that is. Blaezej (talk) 19:34, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

I'm talking to you because you're the one who edited my last comment, obviously! Blaezej (talk) 19:40, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

I'm tired of arguing. Just to point out, it wasn't my ego talking, I was exhasperated because you either seemed to not understand my point our you were outright ignoring it and I was annoyed. Either way, nothing good will come from it, nor will you make the changes I asked of you, so it's pointless to keep talking. No hard feelings. Blaezej (talk) 19:59, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

I understand now, thanks. I'll do my best to be less condescending... I lost my mind for a while, there. I'll make sure that it doesn't happen again. Blaezej (talk) 20:27, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

Re: New Sysop
I've watched the threads as comments have come in through my inbox. I still need to re-read the discussion, write up explanations/details, etc. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 23:02, October 25, 2014 (UTC)

Uhhh........
What happened between me and that Blaezej guy, apparantly I stopped. Wait, why am I complaining on this matter with YOU?? Look Windy, you're nice and I like you as fellow editor, but really, coming on my talkpage (once again) to tell me things I believed I did let go of is not nice. Sorry, but yes, thanks for telling me that, I really find you (uh), 'supportive', I guess would be the word o.O :) --Hisana456 (talk) 03:20, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * And Sakura wasn't the reason at all.....yes, it's true. My comment on psycology, dear Windy, was directed at the general public in large (of the world maybe), cause his remark on racism and whatnot sounded really rude which it was.....and the guy wasn't ignoring if you even read his deleted comments which really showed me how some men attack ladies like that -__- --Hisana456 (talk) 03:29, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Once again, I'm extremely sorry for throwing you out like this but, we're still on good terms I hope. No offense taken right for the talk page thing? :) --Hisana456 (talk) 03:50, October 26, 2014 (UTC)

??
Not to sure why you reverted my edit on the Susanoo page. The reason why i swapped images around was due to Sasuke's enhanced Susanoo image being too long and going into Senjutsu Influence section. And about the slideshow, i know its a recommendation but they don't always have to go on the top of the section as seen on Obito's page. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 03:44, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Okey dokey :) --Sarutobii2 (talk) 03:53, October 26, 2014 (UTC)

I saw someone today bring up the issue about that sword and yes its a dagger, buts its a dagger version of the Sword of Totsuka and not a susanoo dagger. It you insist that it must be noted, then move that image onto the Sword of Totsuka page and replace it on the susanoo page with the manga version of the dagger. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 15:30, October 26, 2014 (UTC)

As always im sorry again. The common sense would of been to bring it up with a mod or on the talkpage but i saw the user biohavik give the same "argument" about the issue as i did in a form of a question towards Elve and i looked at his response and he completely ignored the question and kinda insulted a mistake he/she made in their question. I would of brought the issue up on a talk page but they regularly get ignored unless you bring up something recent in the manga/anime or bring up a heated topic like "does Gaara have magnet release?". Im just saying as bad as it may be sometimes, the only way to get noticed is to take it into your own hands and edit yourself and get feedback afterwards like what you've done now. So after seeing 1 mods carelessness response and knowing most of my talk page questions get ignored i edited the page. I wasnt around a year ago so i dont know as to why the manga version got removed nor do i know why the anime version of the scene remained. I would replace it but i dont have access to good quality images of the manga. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 17:24, October 26, 2014 (UTC)

Re: By the way...
It's buggy but we can make it work. There are some issues with the forumadmin flag alone, I dug into the code and found that the reason was that Wikia's Forum extension depends too much on their Wall extension. Forum extends Wall adding forum functionality based on walls, however it doesn't override everything it should and as a result some of functionality inside the forums is so deep inside Wall that wall rights are checked instead of forumadmin rights. ie: Things like closing threads and editing other users' posts actually require rights to close Wall threads and edit other users' wall posts instead of the forumadmin right.

Fortunately we aren't even using walls at all, so we can just give wall moderation rights to the users we want to have the forumadmin right. I asked a Wikia staff member to setup two groups. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 04:25, October 26, 2014 (UTC)


 * I'll explain in the RfA threads when I'm done with them. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 04:32, October 26, 2014 (UTC)

The RfA threads in the forums worked out well, go ahead and create another one for Forum Admin for yourself. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 19:36, October 26, 2014 (UTC)

bot
How does it work? ^_--Elve Talk Page 11:45, October 27, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Just lettin' you know...
Thanks KazeHoshi-san for notifying me with that. I've noticed that you remove the link that I provided earlier and I realized the reason of that, I referred to the forum rules that these types of links aren't allowed so it's my mistake. And don't worry, TU3-sama will be kind for that issue to me ;) ... Again, kudos for the notification. — Shakhmoot  (Talk) 21:35, October 27, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Chapter 700
Same thoughts, different hands. ;) — Shakhmoot  (Talk) 22:07, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Dog, Ox, Ram, Horse, Snake, Clap hands ..., that's my technique when I edited the article to beat you up. :P — Shakhmoot Nadeshiko Village Symbol.svg (Talk) 22:19, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Lol xD ... Definitely yes :P ... That reminds me back of one of Kishi's interviews that asked for his best jutsu, he answered that Shadow Clone Just because if he can do it, he could end his chapter writing/drawing in seconds rather than hours. :D :D — Shakhmoot Nadeshiko Village Symbol.svg (Talk) 22:32, October 27, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Question
Nah, the News/Announcements board is for stuff that is about the site (new features, Wikia policy updates and new staff etc), whereas Naruto News is for news topics that concern the series (interviews, new databooks, new movies, etc). --Sajuuk Talk Page 22:12, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * The reason why posts like "This" or "+1" are disallowed is because one word posts add nothing to the discussion and kudos is for agreeing with a post. Quoting a whole post just to write "this" is useless and doesn't improve the discussion. --Sajuuk Talk Page 08:01, October 28, 2014 (UTC)