Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-26636534-20180830184727/@comment-33286580-20181112190517

FlatZone wrote: Itachi stated from the start that he didn't want to kill Kabuto, and he even told Sasuke not to kill Kabuto.

True.

FlatZone wrote: Itachi went in with three goals, protect Sasuke, End Edo Tensei, and Save Kabuto.. and guess what?? He did all 3.

Eh... HELL NO!

the only goal Itachi had was to end the Edo.

Sasuke was not even in his plan when he headed out to stop Kabuto. it was Sasuke who on his way to the war saw Itachi and followed him. Itachi knew that Sasuke wasnt leaving him until he got his answers so he decided to fight alongside him. he also understood that Kabuto would try to capture Sasuke and so he protected him when needed. it was not in his original goal.

it was not like Sasuke was some vulnerable kid that needed protection. itachi needed to protect him once.

and just like Itachi protected Sasuke, Sasuke too did the favours by protecting Itachi from stopping Kabuto who intended placing new seal in Itachi and making him his puppet again.

Save Kabuto? are you serious. he never intended to save him. the only reason he didnt kill him because killing (if he could) Kabuto would not undo Edo Tensei. the fact that he placed him under Izanami clearly shows that he had no intention of saving Kabuto. i mean the chances of Kabuto understanding his true self and breaking out of Izanami were not 100%.

also if you somehow say that why didnt Itachi kill him after he undid the Edo then the answer is prety simple. Once the Edo Tensei was undone he being an Edo also was freed. we saw with Madara that once the Edo was undone all the chakra he had build up for the PS just vanished. as in the moment Edo was undone Itachi could not do attack Kabuto in anyways. unless he knew of the Jutsu that Dan Kato did.

FlatZone wrote: I am highly positive that if he wanted to kill Kabuto he would have.

Tell me how. i am willing to debate. i will even agree if you make logical and feat included points.

FlatZone wrote: You are going off feats alone, which is entirely a childish way of doing it, thats like saying "Oh yeah well so and so bench pressed 1000lbs while the other guy only bench pressed 900lbs, theres no way the other guy can beat so and so in a fight!"

if we arent debating around feats and logic than what is the point of debate. we cant just take some fan theories and hype a character. Feat exists because of what the character has shown.

by your example if we take all other factors equal... say both dudes are just bodybuilders and not some secret martial artists... then yes the one who lifts more will win because that guy's punch will be that much more powerful.

FlatZone wrote: The author has the characters tell us stuff, and other characters tell us stuff about another character to help the reader understand more about the character and the characters abilities.

and i think i have taken all character abilities into consideration. if i have not than tell me so and i'll change my analysis.

FlatZone wrote: Like I said before this isn't DBZ where more than half the time A beats B beats C with no doubt.

Yes. this isnt DBZ. this is Naruto.

but again. i have taken all character abilities and traits into consideration. if i have not say so. dont just make blank statemts.

Jason of the Mangekyou wrote:

I give up, i typed a tower of words but all disappered when i had clicked reply.

Damn. it happens if reply to two people by quoting them.

or at least you are saying so and are not being sarcastic and saying that you dont want to debate my points on...

oh well.