User talk:Cerez365

Madara Uchiha
Madara Uchiha is not arrogant, just prideful and confident. An arrogant person is someone constantly overconfident in their abilities and think their better than anyone and therefore can't lose. Madara isn't like that. Hes just firm. But hes right about most everything he says. That doesn't make him arrogant. He wasn't mocking the Kage, he was just playing with them by using their own 5 vs 1 strategy against them. The Fox King(tylerbryant547@gmail.com (talk) 02:47, May 25, 2012 (UTC))

They aren't the same and Madara doesn't brag about himself all the time. Hes proud of his accomplishments. Who wouldn't be? I'm proud of mine. That doesn't make him arrogant. The fox King(tylerbryant547@gmail.com (talk) 15:11, May 25, 2012 (UTC))

Hey Cerez. We don't know what Madara's capability with that combined prowess would have been if he were alive since he hasn't made any appearances in the story alive. We don't know that he wouldn't have been able to do all of that alive as well as dead and having the word reincarnated in there implies we know that he wouldn't have and that we do know what his capability with the combined prowess was in life when we don't. I have removed the word reincarnated and would like to ask why it has to be there. The Fox King(tylerbryant547@gmail.com (talk) 03:04, June 3, 2012 (UTC))

Stuff
U DONT KNOW WAT U TALKIN BOUT!!! I WAS RIGHT ABOUT SUIGETSU AND KIMIMARO AND EVERYTHING ELSE!!!!

Re Killer B
No problem. I tried to end the revert war thing and say he was nearly killed, but the one who edited right before you did just now thought otherwise. The Fox King(tylerbryant547@gmail.com (talk) 20:25, May 26, 2012 (UTC))

Edit on the Susanoo Sword page
I never said that the Susanoo Sword was inaccessible. I only meant that they can acess it after they first used it whenever they want.Undominanthybrid (talk) 16:08, May 27, 2012 (UTC)

Correct me if I wrong, but it was nowhere stated that they CAN'T use it with final/complete Susanoo--Elveonora (talk) 16:12, May 27, 2012 (UTC)

New Naruto Movie
Look at this you think it would make a great movie? XD - White Flash - (Talk) - 02:56, May 28, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Lifted Embar..eh? Ulti-san? o.O
Oh you should know how I work by now. The lesson I wanted to teach was told, now I need to see how they play out. I could very easily, after all flip the switch and reinstate it. /evillaugh--TheUltimate3 (talk) 18:55, May 28, 2012 (UTC)

Out of curiosity, what are you guys talking about?-- Ninja Sheik  19:00, May 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * Pretty sure they are talking about Forum:Administrative Declaration --Speysider (Talk Page) 19:01, May 28, 2012 (UTC)

Oh, that? Huh...well, okay. Thanks.-- Ninja Sheik  19:04, May 28, 2012 (UTC)

One image to rule them all
Didn't expect you to know the Lord of the Rings. X29, Monday, 28th of May, 21:57, 2012.

First of all, I was right about Suigetsu and Mangetsu, according to naruto's overall psychology a spirit can only be in one person at a time, this is proven by Kinkaku and Ginkaku's inability to fully unleash 9tails biju mode, secondly, Suigetsu refers to his brother as the man reputed to be the second coming of the demon Zabuza when he talks to jugo about the ninja swordsman. Kimimaro's kekki genkai can make as many bone's as he wants, when he uses that drill he come out of a bone sticking out of the ground and he has the dinosaur-like bones sticking out of him simultaneously, his blades do have hilts, they look like how many people draw bones.6tailjin (talk) 00:15, May 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * I would like to clear this up.
 * 1) Kinkaku and Ginkaku couldn't go full demon modes because they didn't have the actual demon. The Nine-Tails' chakra is not the Nine-Tails creature.--TheUltimate3 Uzumaki Symbol.svg (talk) 00:59, May 30, 2012 (UTC)

Input
Can you provide your input in the latest discussion on Talk:Outer Path? :) Skitts (talk) 01:35, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Images
Hi Cerez. You said on the Declaration that you would let other users try to upload, which is fine since I managed to get in a few images but I still feel like your uploading too many. Maybe I'm just being paranoid or something. Don't take this personally though, but just thought you should know. --Speysider (Talk Page) 15:29, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Pakura HDShot.png
If you don't like rectangular infoboxes, then take out all the images that make them rectangular and replace them with 4:3 images. Your reasoning is really off and I'm sick and tired of trying to explain things to people because it's starting to get to the point that people want the wiki their way and not the communities way. --Speysider (Talk Page)


 * If that is the case, then I'll ask for my Pakura HDShot image to be deleted and then allow someone to upload their own image because cropping it to a 4:3 aspect ratio stops making it HD. I upload the files and then people take credit for what I upload by reuploading images that stop making it HD. I'm not personally attacking you, but you can't seem to recognise my sarcasm at all. --Speysider (Talk Page) 17:06, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

"Taking credit for what you upload? Where did you see them do that?"


 * The wiki uses the latest revision as the person who uploaded. So if I uploaded an image and then someone reuploaded over that, they'd get the credit for the upload.
 * Why don't you just stop attacking me, I'm trying to contribute and I am sick and tired of you constantly jumping down my throat at nearly everything I do, which generally includes uploading images. The filename of an image is meant to reference what it's about. If I put HDShot in it, that automatically makes people think the image is going to be HD and they'll be disappointed when it's not. Try reading this which clearly explains that if an image is not in the 16:9 ratio, it's not HD. You need to back off a bit and stop hogging this wiki to yourself and stop acting as though you run this place. A little rude I must admit, but it's the truth. --Speysider (Talk Page) 17:57, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Specific or General?
We have pages here where we have specific users mentioned like this one but I had always thought we had to use the generic user and only use specifics after we described the technique or if the name would make the description easier. Can you please help with this one? Joshbl56 10:20, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Rationale on my images
Please leave them alone. There's absolutely nothing wrong with them, all of them were taken at 1080p HD and it's quite obvious you DO hate HD images. --Speysider (Talk Page) 16:22, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

"Images don't belong to people, it belongs to the wiki unless you created it."

I know that images don't belong to people. "It just happens that one person might upload the image."

That makes absolutely no sense at all... "Now as for the rationale, I apologise, I was just so overcome with hatred that I had to change it, not because I've done it a million times in order to make the rationales mainstream."

Hatred at what ? If it's real life, you should seriously not bring those issues to the wiki because that's a very bad idea. Plus, the rationales are all intended to be different to give info about the image they are referencing. If it was taken at 1080p HD, they should say that. If it was a drop down form list that set the rationale for you, then I would accept your logic but they are intended to be written by the uploader since the uploader will know more about the image properties. --Speysider (Talk Page) 16:39, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Eight Trigrams: Sixty Four Palms
Okay, I just realized I was wrong for that and I apologise for that. Please don't accuse me of abusing the rollback function. I also didn't contact you because I don't still see that as a big issue. —IndxcvNovelist (talk 16:53, June 2, 2012 (UTC)