Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-17623-20160607102724/@comment-1251315-20160608123441

NeedleJizo wrote: Filler was never considered non-canon on this wiki, just some users who shoved their personal opinions all over the place in the last couple of years made it sound like it was. Like I said before: we never had any problems with recording things in the past and canonicity was never brought up because it never mattered then, this policy is an attempt to bring back exactly what the wiki was like in the past, a place which recorded everything and didn't harp on about canonicity.
 * Does the existence of A-canon mean filler is technically no longer a thing/no longer considered non-canon?

Filler will always exist in the anime, but it is canon in its own right (no matter what some people try to force on others) because, unless the manga contradicts something the anime says, something stated in filler is considered "true" to this wiki because no higher authority says it's not true.