User talk:Newestman

Hello Newestman, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Talk:Dance of the Shikigami page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Jacce (Talk) 10:13, August 11, 2011

Dance of the Shikigami
In regards to your edit on Dance of the Shikigami, I don't think you get it she was never said to be invulnerable at any point in time; the paper is still her body. Madara absorbing her in paper form or someone burning all the paper up would kill her. I think you're confusing it because it often seems like she's expending her body parts for attacks.--Cerez365™ 15:10, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * I understand that it's very likely if an attack destroys all the papers, then she's gone. But we really can't be very sure of that assumption. It was never explicitly stated, nor established, although it was implied. Remember I originally explained the whole phenomenon as relating to her losing her "intact" portion. But then after looking into it thoroughly, I figured that there could be other reasons. And the one you're giving, could be one of them. But when you have more than one fitting-explanation for a phenomenon, then it's best to regard all the explanations as speculations. And that's why i turned down on my own initial suggestion. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't mention the fact that the technique has some vulnerabilities. It was clearly established that it has some, but we can never say complete with full confidence what it is since there are more than one explanations that could fit into the picture. That's why i decided to mention that it has some vulnerabilities without being specific, but still state the context in which that vulnerability was shown. it's the best way to address this issue without jumping the gun.


 * Also you should be more discreet with the way you handle discussions and editing. You have a bad habit of not assessing the discussion properly before jumping to action, like your reply to my first post on this topic.


 * Here is the sentence I added to the page. Read it again and you will see that it addresses the issue without including any of the speculations we suggested: However, during her battle with Madara, it was shown that this technique has some vulnerabilities when he attempted to warp all the papers into another dimension--Newestman (talk) 15:45, August 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * You have a bad habit of not assessing the discussion properly before jumping to action--Newestman (talk) 16:22, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

Firstly, I should say I never saw this> People tend not to write on their own talk pages when responding to someone and with the exception of one person here I don't know to look out for it from anyone else.

That being said, you still don't get that what you're putting into the article is an assumption you're making based off the notion that you have that the technique makes her invulnerable in some way. I cannot recall any point in time where it was said or even remotely implied in any way that she was invulnerable to attacks or anything like that so you need to provide reference for it so that I can see it. As for her remaining in tact I have tried explaining that to you to whatever ends I'm not sure.--Cerez365™ 17:21, August 13, 2011 (UTC)