Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-1514283-20140829001753/@comment-24531362-20140830091337

Seelentau wrote: I have but one question: How in all seven kingdoms were you guys convinced that the consensus is in the right?

Look at the Magnet Release issue: If I recall correctly, the consensus was that Gaara has MR. However, I wrote an analysis solely based on the manga facts and the result was that it's wrong to add Gaara as a MR user, since the proof given by you guys was not solid enough. So we didn't add him as a user based on that.

What if the next time you guys reach a consensus, I can't write a counter analysis because I don't have the necessary information/knowledge? Then you guys can do what you want because I can't disproof it, all while ignoring that you can't say for sure that you're right, either. Simply because we don't have enough information. ...was that understandable? ^^'

If the consensus has adequate evidence to support its inference, it is assumed correct until directly proven wrong. The Gaara MR debate is a key example. The consensus of Gaara having MR fell apart when faced with facts, and so was not adopted. If another, similar consensus with evidence emerged on another topic, like, say, Bijuu genders, and was unable to be directly disputed by facts, it is assumed to be correct until new facts show that this is not the case.