User talk:Snapper2

Custodian
I sent this originally to Dantman, but he's asked me to contact other sysops who delete the redirects left behind from the images that I move to other names for an answer. To save time, I'll simply quote what I wrote to Dantman: "One of the main things that I do on the wiki is to move images to new file names where appropriate. The problem is that this leaves redirects that then need to be tagged for deletion and that could take a while. I believe Wikia has a custodian flag that provides the ability for a user to suppress redirect creation so I'm asking if it's possible that I could be given the 'custodian' flag to suppress redirects. Thanks." Please reply when possible. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:28, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * Please check this thread when you can, thanks. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 20:45, July 13, 2014 (UTC)

re: credits
maybe, but i think its pretty important to notate the difference between the fodder clones and the actual Zetsus (B/W), and specify which ones are actually in the episodes. It really can't hurt, its only being more informative.--RexGodwin (talk) 04:54, July 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * aight, will do. Sorry, I just thought those were just the usual kanji of the characters, and i figured it would look better to go with the specific characters;White Zetsu clones, White Zetsu, Black Zetsu, etc.--RexGodwin (talk) 05:01, July 13, 2014 (UTC)

Chat
Can you please come onto the live chat ? Need to discuss something with as many sysops as possible. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:51, July 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry if I didn't catch you yesterday. You available to come on chat atm? --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 18:28, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * I just want to chat to some sysops about stuff, but I'd like to do that in real time and in private. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 08:59, July 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * Bump, would like to talk with you in chat if possible. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 17:47, July 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * The thing I would like to discuss needs to be in private. Also, I move files to romaji because it's shorter in most cases. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 18:01, July 31, 2014 (UTC)

pregunta imagen panoramica
Hola te escribo en español, es que vi que subiste una imagen panorámica la de los hyuga defendiendo a naruto y quisiera que me ayudes como se hacen? o donde las encontraste? --Jesicahyuga (talk) 03:18, July 28, 2014 (UTC)

Naruto's eyes
Actually they aren't the same. Sage Mode + Kurama influence eyes are red with orange pigmentation around, while Six Paths Sage Technique lacks the orange pigmentation and the eyes are yellow.--Elveonora (talk) 19:02, July 31, 2014 (UTC)

The Ultimate Clash of Ninja is here!!!
Please help me I want the game to announce Nintendo Wii U is the Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Clash of Ninja and has called Naruto Shippuden: Clash of Ninja Project to be released in 2014/2015 in North American and European in the production Takara Tomy and D3 Publisher and Developer is also 8ing? --Alexribeiro.soares.7 (talk) 19:25, July 31, 2014 (UTC)

Gifs
Do you think that Naruto wiki could start doing Gif for the techniques
 * This wiki will not use gifs, as they're mostly illegal and very annoying. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 18:02, August 1, 2014 (UTC)

Sysop request page
I commented out the text since it kinda made the page a little messy. Maybe it'd be better to have it above the headers so people see that first before they make a request? The request sections would be better off just having the requests themselves imo. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 18:02, August 1, 2014 (UTC)

Italian Naruto Wiki
I think you're an admin of this wiki, please forgive me if I'm wrong. The other admin of the Italian Naruto Wiki asked to this wiki to start a sharing of your images for our wiki, so we don't need to upload images. That's totally insane. The other users are lazy teenagers who don't want to work. Our wiki needs images with italian names. So I ask to you, or whoever is the creator of that shared database, to "close" it. The other users of the italian Naruto Wiki will learn how to upload correctly images, as all users in all nations' wikis about all topics do. --Meganoide (talk) 21:23, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know why you contacted this wiki, we can't exactly do anything. If you have a problem with your users that you cannot solve, you should just contact Wikia and ask for their advice through the contact form on your wiki. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 21:29, August 3, 2014 (UTC)

Cussed Me Out
I posted something about the new Naruto Shippuden 7 Movie and this guy/girl randomly cussed me out for it. I don't think he should be part of this wiki. I don't know why.

http://naruto.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:GamerTimeUS

His/Her name is Alexribeiro.soares.7

--GamerTimeUS (talk) 02:27, August 6, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks --GamerTimeUS (talk) 14:55, August 6, 2014 (UTC)

threads
I'm not entirely sure that goading users like this is going to achieve very much. Try to avoid replying to posts like the one you did, it makes you the bigger man and more respectable. Only a suggestion. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 23:23, August 7, 2014 (UTC)

Weapons article
could you check it out. after you read the last couple of edits there i guess if you say "NO" then the disscusion will be dropped ok. Munchvtec (talk) 03:51, August 9, 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism
One message does not overturn vandalism. There was a consensus on Gaara's talk page as well as the talk page on Magnet Release. A single user doesn't get to overturn that because he's mad about it. But do as you will, I will no longer intervene if this is what is considered to be allowed now. Edit: I saw Seel's link. You explain to me how that overturns a decision made on two separate talk pages and excuses vandalism and I'll relent to you. ~ Ten Tailed Fox 17:40, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Didn't see the talk page >_> Wish that had been linked first. Very well, your point is made. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Rinnegan Sasuke.svg 17:44, August 12, 2014 (UTC)

sage art article
I noticed you removed the article lead and made the "Usage" section the lead. Is there any reason why you did this? The lead that was originally there is part of standardising all the technique pages, which is now inconsistent when you deleted the text. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 20:42, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * See here, although it never actually got anywhere, the wiki has been making sure all technique articles are standardised with an article lead. Length doesn't matter. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 20:48, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Not sure how I missed this, but jutsu/technique articles should be following the Manual of Style section order. Articles not following it should be updated for consistency. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 12:23, August 22, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Chōmei
Accepted. Thank you for your message. Iloveinoxxx (talk) 10:52, August 17, 2014 (UTC)

RE: sections
i do believe every character should at least have an appearance and maybe a personality section if thats okay with you? Munchvtec (talk) 11:31, August 19, 2014 (UTC)

...
Could you try to keep the level of mocking in your edit summaries to a bare minimum? I didn't really appreciate the edit being reverted, as there's no source that the supposed edit is even correct and your edit summary wasn't really helpful (I'll ask Seelentau to confirm). --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 22:36, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, I assumed good faith in the edit, why do you continually assume I don't? When it comes to Japanese text on the wiki, I prefer it if people like Seelentau confirm such changes. Whether you might speak Japanese or not, I consider Seelentau to be the wiki's resident translator for all stuff on the wiki, as do many other editors. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page
 * I guess you have a point, just try to avoid coming across as "mocking" others :/ (while I'm at it, why is your userpage just a big table of coloured squares? That doesn't follow Userpage policy whatsoever....) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 22:51, August 19, 2014 (UTC)

Multiple usage of one image in an article
Hello, I saw that you reverted my replacement of Kankuro's first painting pattern with the reasoning that it's okay to have the same image more than once in an article. I was always under the impression that that's not the case and violated the policy or something like that. In my opinion, it looks weird having the same image more than once in an article, especially when it shows the character's appearance. I mean, why would you like to go to the appearance section when the image is literally the very first you see when you visit the article? Norleon (talk) 11:36, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

ok Munchvtec (talk) 11:46, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I didn't know that was the purpose of "fair use". I get what you mean with it, but I remember certain instances where images got removed due to multiple usage (some of those I did myself), so I thought that was the norm. Maybe a mention in the image policy would be good to prevent further misunderstandings. Norleon (talk) 11:47, August 21, 2014 (UTC)

Hiii
Thought I should pop by to say that I'm back... what's with the ˈaɪd(ə)l wall? Lol :D ~Hakinu (talk 16:19, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * ~flinch~ YES SIR ~Hakinu (talk 18:30, August 22, 2014 (UTC)

Elveonora
Given how he's denying what the manga is actually claiming and asserting that everyone else is wrong but him, as well as insulting multiple users including Ten-Tailed Fox, shouldn't he be blocked for now?--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 20:54, August 24, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Chapter Covers
Sorry, I must have missed that policy. I'll only upload chapter covers that are separate from the events of the series from now on. 19:30, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello. I happened to stuble across this, and I'd like to question you about this chapter cover. Since it has speech bubbles, doesn't it go against the unspoken policy?--Mangekyō Sharingan Izuna.svg JOA20 19:42, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * Snapper, I'm pretty sure it's not a problem when it's a raw... As I said on his talk page, the problem was the copyright issue that came with fans altering the raw. If they're unaltered, and ROBO claims they're not, I don't think there's a problem. Do you? Could you reply to ROBO's talk page, please? ~Hakinu Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk 04:13, August 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * I understand what you're saying, personally I don't think anyone's going to be coming to the Naruto wiki to read the manga, but I do get that most of the time the full page isn't needed just to describe the title. In my opinion, having the chapter covers just makes the pages look nicer, but I know that's not what a wiki is for. 12:45,8/30/2014 12:45, August 30, 2014 (UTC)

HI!
Thanks snapper!i'll be sure to stick around!--The Ultimate Dragon (talk) 05:17, August 31, 2014 (UTC)DrakeDragneel

explanation
In short, the plan was to move the content from the Shinju article into a separate "Ten-Tails" article without a redirect, keeping things only related to the tree itself in the Shinju article.--Elveonora (talk) 18:38, August 31, 2014 (UTC)

You are right. Are you willing to help then? We would like "Shinju" article to be separate rather than just a redirect for the Ten-Tails. Not sure, but this may require some things to move around. For example Madara's infobox and so says: "jinchuuriki: Shinju" but should say "Ten-Tails" instead.--Elveonora (talk) 18:49, August 31, 2014 (UTC)

I see, so it's as Seelentau said, easy. Thanks a lot. Although I wonder, do only characters get infoboxes? I'm not sure if a tree is to be considered a character.--Elveonora (talk) 18:58, August 31, 2014 (UTC)

Would you please change "Shinju" to "Ten-Tails" in Truth Seeking Ball infobox? I would, but it's locked, thanks in advance.--Elveonora (talk) 20:04, August 31, 2014 (UTC)

Will get to that tomorrow, okay? Thank you for having helped with some.--Elveonora (talk) 19:58, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

A few more to go, but I will leave those for later, because they come with whole lot of clusterfuck. Some say the tree Obito summoned was final/true form of the Ten-Tails, others Tailed Beast Mode, others extension, while others that it was recreated Shinju replica. That's an inconsistency that has to be sorted out on talkpage. I tried, but no one cares, so shrugs.--Elveonora (talk) 11:14, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

your opinion
hey buddy...sry 2 disturb... I've made 2 issues regarding the shinju and hagoromo pasges in their talk pages...about the shinju...there's a rinnegan in its KG infobox...tell me your honest opinion...you really believe this is right? and about hagoromo...in its six paths sage technique there's sth written about the six paths technique...I wondered why and don't think it is relevant to that matter...and in none of the issues I've made had been a change in the articles...except that elve answered to some extent...now I would be happy to edit them myself but since I donno exactly how & am sure that I would end up make things even worse I decided to come ask you personally...I asked omnibender too but didn't answer...so...what do you think... --DARK ZER06 (talk) 19:55, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

U got it wrong...my issue with shinju is I think it's wrong to say that it had rinnegan...& I'm in favor of removing it...I wanted Ur opinion about it...U think it's correct to say it had it while there's no proof in the manga...we don't know the tree which TT transformed into was the original shinju or not...shinju stopped existing the moment kaguya merged with it so how can obito summon it again?... and the hagoromo thing...check its talk page...I said there that in the six paths sage technique there's sth written about the six paths tech...what relevance does that have with it...I think it's incorrect info... --DARK ZER06 (talk) 20:38, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Kaguya didn't merge with it tho, not sure where that misconception comes from. We were told Shinju incarnated into Kaguya. That means it still exists in her--Elveonora (talk) 20:43, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

Naruto Shippūden: Clash of Ninja Revolution 4
Naruto Shippūden: Clash of Ninja Revolution 4 is just an idea he is putting out there to see if TOMY, the publisher of the Clash of Ninja series, and Eighting, the developer of the Clash of Ninja series, will accept his ideas and make a better game. This game is expected, by Itsuchi2, to cover from the beginning of Naruto Shippūden through the Gokage Summit arc. This game is expected to be released either in summer 2014 or fall 2014 for the Nintendo Wii U. Alexribeiro.soares.7 (talk) 01:10, September 9, 2014 (UTC)


 * The problem is looking at this web site on see: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Naruto-Shippuden-Clash-of-Ninja-Revolution-4/144373162305809 you see that's why the fans want this game the successor of Naruto Shippūden: Clash of Ninja Revolution 3 calling Naruto Shippūden: Clash of Ninja Revolution 4 for the Nintendo Wii U game connected Naruto Shippūden: Gekitō Ninja Taisen! Special for English dubbed because the Nintendo Wii is Dead. Alexribeiro.soares.7 (talk) 01:15, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Movie template
what exactly will happen with this? you where not very clear. Munchvtec (talk) 17:13, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot
For not deleting the Deadlock page I made. I had no remembrance of @Kunoichi101's creation of New Three-Way Deadlock page. Thank you for redirecting it to the page I created. I was worried that sysops and rollbacks would get mad and delete my page due to the existence of Kunoichi101's page. I don't think I've communicated with you on this wiki at all, so let's start on a good note. Again, thanks. -- WindStar7125   02:40, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
It's really nice that me and you are actually agreeing on things now. Munchvtec (talk) 17:46, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Kakashi Full Appearence
Hey there! I was just wondering could you possibly upload a full body image of Kakashi from the Ultimate Ninja Storm series like you have with so many other characters on the wiki? I'd like to use it for his appearence section. Or could you at least tell me where to find them?  Banan 14  kab  04:05, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

opinion needed
http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:140792 thanks in advance--Elveonora (talk) 18:39, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Preview
I use the preview feature every time I make an edit. The reason why I make edits to my own comments in such a short time is not because of typos (though I still do have typos regardless), it's because I have second thoughts. A lot of time I feel I need to add more to the comment I just added. If me editing my own comments a lot bothered you or anything, I apologize. But just to let you know, I almost always use the preview feature. I just second-guess what I commented on a lot, and I feel the need to add more perspective to what I say. For instance, I could have a paragraph of my thoughts posted, and I feel I need to either add more sentences to what I said or emphasize (meaning bold or italicize) some phrases in my comments to clarify my overall statements. But the preview feature is nothing new to me, I always use it. -- WindStar7125   19:39, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay then. I understand. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 03:47, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

archive 4
Can you please delete it? Made it by an accident, those two topics were meant to stay on my talkpage rather than be archived.--Elve Talk Page 19:55, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

Kisses hands, feet and whatever you desire :P--Elve Talk Page 20:26, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome! --JMac14 (talk) 20:25, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

request
Hi, can you add "Moderator" to Seelentau's badges on the forum tags script? Just follow the format used on UltimateSupreme's tag to add it. Thanks. --Sajuuk Talk Page 13:40, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * No, some users can have multiple tags. Being a translator does not automatically make the person a forum moderator and I notice Seelentau doing a lot of moderator style tasks on the forums and wish him to be tagged as a translator and moderator. I messaged you directly because this did not require a message on the requests page. --Sajuuk Talk Page 17:28, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * MediaWiki namespace pages don't count as "protected", they are interface pages that are always sysop-only editing. --Sajuuk Talk Page 18:38, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * No offence, but instead of being nitpicky and telling me to go elsewhere, you could have just done as I requested. But no, for you, you simply have to tell people in a round about way that you aren't doing what they've asked of you. Kinda annoying when they ask you to do things and you just take people round in circles and not do as requested. I'll just ask someone else who isn't going to send me round in circles for requests in future. --Sajuuk Talk Page 18:49, October 2, 2014 (UTC)

New Thread?
How would you feel about making a new thread on the Wiki Discussions Board about the option you came up with on the Ten-Tails Revival Arc Talkpage? It seems like more people gravitate towards the forum to discuss these topics, and after the initial idea, nothing has really come from it. Probably because, as I said, the forums make these much easier to discuss. If you'd like, I can even create the new thread if you'd like (and I would use your words verbatim instead of adding my own twist). Let me know... --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 18:32, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Not that my opinion matters that much, but I'd rather keep the discussion of this arc on the talkpages. Saves us the needless arguing and the fanon the forums bring (regardless of the edit conflicts). • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 18:46, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Discussing it on the forums (at least in Wiki Discussions) is better, as most of the arguing happens in Naruto Discussions, but I digress. ;) --Sajuuk Talk Page 18:50, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm just gonna wait to see how Snapper feels- it is his idea after all, and so I don't want to move ahead on things that I don't have the right to do. --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 01:43, October 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay- thank you for your input. I will create a new thread tonight, and quote you verbatim. However, if there are no more responses as you predict, then how should we proceed? After all, it seems as if most of the votes are in favor of your suggestion rather than opposed. --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 19:47, October 6, 2014 (UTC)

Question
Why exactly were the markers (such as Moderator, Translator, Sysop, etc.) in the forums changed from red to green? • WindStar7125     18:51, October 10, 2014 (UTC)

About the thread you restored
Superlogan is not discussing the wiki. He's basically asking why a lot of his edits are reverted. He wasn't happy about how some of his edits (which, were either bad-faith ones or violated policies) were reverted. Now basically he's whining about why his edits are reverted, to sum it up. • WindStar7125     02:51, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay then. I'll try to be more understanding and patient in the future. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 03:02, October 13, 2014 (UTC)

About what I said in the requests
Here's my proposal: In the forums, I do not think that every user should be given the privilege to remove other's comments and restore threads that have been removed. Simply because of this: Forum activity is going to increase. There are many opinions that users don't like seeing in the forums, and they feel the need to remove them. If more and more users find out about the removal feature, they'll keep wanting to remove other posts they don't like. Why exactly should every user have that privilege? I'd say the feature should only be to the moderators of the forums (rollbacks, sysops, translators, etc.). That's my opinion. If you have opposing arguments, I'll gladly listen. I don't want to make it seem that rollbacks, moderators and sysops are on another level than other users, but it's a moderator's job to clean forums of disruptive comments, not up to users to remove other's opinions because they don't like them. Everyone is entitled to their opinion.

Edit: Recently, it happened in the forums when a user removed a moderator's reply because it disagreed with their opinion. That shouldn't be allowed at all. I warned him only for him to do it again. Instead of blocking other users for it, we should take out that ability altogether. • WindStar7125     03:09, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, so you happen to somewhat agree? But who exactly would I have to ask? • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 03:14, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... okay, so I can try to remove the rights for every user to have the privilege to remove other's comments (which is a moderator's job)? Can you guide me through the process a little bit? • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 03:19, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that. That is exactly why I wanted to talk to sysops, moderators, rollbacks and translators about it. I know that many users would disagree with them not having the ability to remove other's posts, but why should they have that privilege? You said it yourself, this wiki is not a democracy, thank God. If I put that on the forums, that would have caused an inflammatory response from other users, and you know I try not to fight. If I can get a consensus from discussion with sysops, rollbacks, etc., it can happen. I know that much, but the thing is, I don't want to fight. And at the same time, I don't want users who aren't moderators remove other's opinions because they don't like them or because they disagree with theirs. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Users shouldn't have the right to remove other's opinions. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 03:28, October 13, 2014 (UTC)

So... where would you recommended this discussion be located? I didn't want it to be on the forums because I don't want to cause a big rift within the wiki. I'm not trying to create sysops/rollbacks/translators/moderators vs. the rest of the wiki users, I'm just proposing that if we don't give the users that privilege, we wouldn't have to go through the process of constantly warning them and blocking them. It's a moderator's job to clean the forums, not for just any users to remove opinions when they feel like it. But you said we need a consensus, but at the same time, users who aren't moderators would disagree, so how would the consensus come to be? • WindStar7125     03:55, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay. I understand. But I don't want to make it seem as if I'm saying users who don't have flags or markers are unimportant. I don't feel that way. Everyone's contributions are needed. But it seems like I might have to take the risk in putting it in the forums. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 04:14, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * In fact, I have a better idea: why not you propose this (on the forums) instead of me? You're much more respected and people would listen to you more than myself. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 04:32, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * Post removal isn't covered under any rights, this is why the previous consensus fell through: it was not possible to do so, because the specific code is hardcoded and not based on user rights. Wikia claims they will be introducing a better rights system for the forums, but I'll believe that when I actually see it.
 * For now, users removing other people's posts is something we'll have to deal with as being an abuse of the system, as it's being given currently under an assumption of good faith that some users are abusing. --Sajuuk Talk Page 07:52, October 13, 2014 (UTC)

TES
Heh, thanks for indirectly making me realize that "TES wiki" refers to the Elder Scrolls wiki. The reply I got from staff saying that there was a problem specific to Elder Scrolls' setup that made forumadmin buggy fits into context a lot better. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 22:51, October 13, 2014 (UTC)

662 or 663?
Why not 663? Isn't that when the TT is revived again? • WindStar7125     20:33, October 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I was thinking 663 because that's when the TT was revived again and that's when Madara became the TT jinchuuriki. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 04:36, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * You know what, now that I think about it, 662 seems better now. 663 is when the Ten-Tails is revived, yes, but that's also when Madara becomes its jinchuuriki, and plans to get the left eye for the purpose of the Infinite Tsukuyomi. Basically, Madara becoming the jinchuuriki is the start of the events leading to the Infinite Tsukuyomi Arc (now renamed the "Final Arc"). You still do have a lot of work to do on the characters' articles though, :P. Events that have happened in the Ten-Tails Revival Arc are still part of the "Final Arc" in their articles. For example, Naruto having Yang-Kurama extracted from him is still part of the "Final Arc" section in his article instead of the Ten-Tails Revival Arc, and Sasuke being stabbed is still part of the Final Arc in his article, and so on. It might be quite the task to get all of those articles up to speed with the extension of the Ten-Tails Revival Arc. Unless you have a shorter way of doing so... • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 20:45, October 18, 2014 (UTC)

Infobox image
Hey snapper, i noticed you replaced the 1st kages infoboxes with the new images. Just about the image of the 1st Tsuchikage wearing his headpiece, he looks alot older in that image compared to when he was at the kage summit. So my question is when a character only appears during flash blacks and at different ages, do we choose a image of them at their oldest like how Yahiko's infobox image is of him as a adult and not of him as a kid? I'm just curious. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 00:24, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh okay, thanks for the swift reply. Was just curious as the issue rarely happens and i prefer the current image anyway. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 04:48, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

Deleting
I would advise that you use Special:WhatLinksHere to find if pages you are deleting are actually linked. Madara's Teleporting Technique, for example, is linked in multiple places which have left red links unnecessarily. Deleting pages without leaving reasons and not fixing the bunch of red links that are left in the deletion's wake just causes problems for editors who go to these pages. --Sajuuk Talk Page 08:40, October 24, 2014 (UTC)