User talk:Omnibender

I don't care about wiki affiliation requests, and will not reply to them.

Manifestation (Kama)
I don't understand how you can place the manifestation as a general case when it is not at all. "boruto uzumaki you're quite a puzzle, Momoshiki's consciousness [...] how did it emerge to this degree, when you're just a vessel" a simple analysis of the sentence makes it possible to deduce that the consciousness of an otsutsuki only emerges to this degree at the moment of the resurrection of the Otsutsuki + that it's abnormal and unique to Boruto. Further evidence in chapter 53, Isshiki says that when he will places the Kama on Kawaki and dies, it will be "no more than a slightly length nap" implying that the otsutsuki's soul until it's resurrected is inactive/asleep. So we can't place "manifestation" as a general case/ability of Kama, only Boruto have this problem. —This unsigned comment was made by ZéroFusion0 (talk &bull; contribs) .

Edits
Hey dude, I see that you're reverting my edits about the alternate word spellings. Sorry about that and I will be more careful in the future. Kiyere0317

Original voice actors with deceased icon
not sure if i may, but Gamabunta's original seiyu is the only one marked with deceased icon but... i was wondering if we keep that or remove it from Gamabunta's infobox. if not, i understand Kunoichi101 (talk) 12:42, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Bubble Release
Ola! Tudo bem? Percebi que recentemente foram adicionadas informações sobre o "Bubble Release" aqui na Narutopedia. No entanto, há um erro no kanji e rōmaji citados. Conforme você pode conferir na sexta coluna desta imagem, o kanji correto seria "泡遁", enquanto o rōmaji é "Awaton", de acordo com o furigana utilizado "あわとん". Lukas Pessoa Dantas (talk) 22:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Por nada! Outro erro que percebi foi ao dizer que o Shikamaru "decidiu" chamar de Awaton. Na realidade ele questiona se a técnica que ele viu antes é composta por essa natureza. Ao que parece, a novela revelou a existência de uma nova natureza de chakra. Enfim, se precisar de algo pode contar comigo. Lukas Pessoa Dantas (talk) 02:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Concordo com você. Essa história dos elementos desandou de tal maneira que atualmente sequer se importam em relevar a composição das kekkei genkais, o que decepcionante. Lukas Pessoa Dantas (talk) 03:26, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

RE: Standard discussion
Apologies with my late reply- with my new schedule my activity is a bit more sporadic. In terms of discussion on editing standards, I personally think that it could be redirected to the manual of style or writing policy talk pages when proposing updates, changes, or general formatting, though I'm a bit worried it won't gain as much traction compared to infobox talk pages or articles. In terms of your proposal to not list movie novels, I think I'm on the same boat as well. It would be too much of a hassle to track differentiations and precedence for potentially minor events regardless if it appeared in the movie or novel. Chronologically speaking, I'd probably boot novel versions of movies if the movies came out first, but that's just my opinion on it. With a massive information collection FANDOM like Narutopedia, adding additional parameters would likely just make things more complicated all around. -Ventillate { 👤 | 💬 | 🔧 } 19:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)