Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-1251315-20141209223032/@comment-25227224-20141210211518

SuperSajuuk wrote: You know what's so funny? The fact that we already report the official title in the article lead. Is that not enough for most of you?

If someone was willing, they could go and add the databook title on the appropriate arc pages which are missing that infromation and then this would be over and done with.

A compromise needs to be set imo: leave the article pages alone, but state the databook title in the lead. Both sides are happy. :/

But why should there be a compromise? Would there be any much more of a compromise, if we had less of the electorate - no, we wouldn't. I doubt it. Everyone on your position would say the same tune, saying "well we already have them (X) - or that "Well we never used them, so good riddance". So your position couldn't win (at the moment), now let's just filibuster? Then what was the point of this?

With to respect; even those in the community agreed with the our position. (at the moment)

The reason the vote process was even inserted to begin with is because there was no compromise. Now that we have reached; let's double-down?