User talk:SuperSajuuk

Notice: This talkpage may be archived without warning.

WARNING: If you post on this talkpage with intimidating behaviour or harassment, you will be blocked by a sysop on sight!

How rude
How rude of you all want is a yes or no answer to my question;now, why did you delete my question?--Solidedub (talk) 18:50, December 9, 2014 (UTC)

Maintenance
A forum you highlighted recently mentioned removing redlinks from pages. The Talkpage policy states, "Do not remove or edit old messages." Would editing old messages on talk pages for maintenance purposes - obviously preserving the content so as to keep in the spirit of why this rule exists - be considered a violation? Without allowing such I feel the special maintenance pages have been rendered near worthless due to all the clutter of redlinks from talk pages. — Moonrise4 (talk) 04:44, December 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I was planning on just removing one of the sets of brackets so they preserve the name and look like they were supposed to be a link. — Moonrise4 (talk) 13:47, December 10, 2014 (UTC)

Arc names
Hey Sajuuk, is it worth adding the list of official arc names to the voting page you highlighted? Just so users are aware of what there getting themselves into. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 11:46, December 10, 2014 (UTC)

1.Prologue — Land of Waves

2. Chūnin Exams

3. Konoha Crush

4. Search for Tsunade

5. Sasuke Recovery Mission

6. Kazekage Rescue Mission

7. Bridge of Heaven and Earth Reconnaissance Mission

8. Akatsuki Subjugation Mission

9. Itachi Pursuit Mission

10. Tale of Jiraiya the Gallant

11. Fated Battle Between Brothers

12. Pain's Assault

13. Gokage Summit

14. Fourth Great Ninja War: Countdown

15. Fourth Great Ninja War: Confrontation

16. Fourth Great Ninja War: Climax

17. Birth of Ten Tails' Jinchuriki

18. Ohtsutsuki Kaguya Strikes

--Sarutobii2 (talk) 11:57, December 10, 2014 (UTC)


 * 1) Prologue — Land of Waves (Introduction Arc + Land of Waves Arc)
 * 2) Chūnin Exams (Chūnin Exams Arc)
 * 3) Konoha Crush (Invasion of Konoha Arc)
 * 4) Search for Tsunade (Search for Tsunade Arc)
 * 5) Sasuke Recovery Mission (Sasuke Retrieval Arc)
 * 6) Kazekage Rescue Mission (Kazekage Rescue Arc)
 * 7) Bridge of Heaven and Earth Reconnaissance Mission (Sasuke and Sai Arc)
 * 8) “Akatsuki” Subjugation Mission (Hidan and Kakuzu Arc)
 * 9) Itachi Pursuit Mission (Itachi Pursuit Arc)
 * 10) Tale of Jiraiya the Gallant (volumes 40-42) (Itachi Pursuit Arc)
 * 11) Fated Battle Between Brothers (volumes 42-44) (Itachi Pursuit Arc)
 * 12) Pain's Assault (volumes 45-48) (Invasion of Pain Arc)
 * 13) Gokage Summit (volumes 49-51) (Confining the Jinchuriki Arc)
 * 14) Fourth Great Ninja War: Countdown (volumes 52-55) (Confining the Jinchuriki Arc)
 * 15) Fourth Great Ninja War: Confrontation (volumes 55-59) (Fourth Shinobi World War Arc)
 * 16) Fourth Great Ninja War: Climax (volumes 59-67)(Fourth Shinobi World War Arc)
 * 17) Birth of Ten Tails' Jinchuriki (volumes 67-70)(Ten-Tails Revival Arc)
 * 18) Ohtsutsuki Kaguya Strikes (volumes 70-71) (Final Arc)

In order to showcase the databook names and the names we chose. I suggest you let them know what will be replaced.

Edit: Also, I suggest bolding the arc names we use to further differentiate (Like I did here^^^). And also, point out that what's bolded in the parentheses are the names we use. Meaning I suggest you delete the first one with only the databook names and only showcase the one that shows both options. ~• WS7125 [Mod] 12:05, December 10, 2014 (UTC)

Sensing Water Sphere
What's your reason for Sensing Water Sphere not being Water Release? Sorry, but unless you have a good reason, I can't accept that, just 'cause you dislike the idea. As for myself, there are many hints of this technique being Water Release - the sphere is made out of water, it has water in its name, it uses water(bubbles) to monitor the surrounding area, what more proof do you need? Also, techniques in the databook aren't just stated to be of a nature, don't we just add the natures based on the descriptions?--Omojuze (talk) 15:22, December 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * If a sphere, made of water, that uses water for a specific purpose, if not enough of a proof for you, just because it doesn't have Water Release in its name, whatever, I can go your way, which is unlike you. I was just trying to avoid the whole Body Pathway Derangement/Lightning Release-thing--Omojuze (talk) 15:34, December 10, 2014 (UTC)

can this account deactivate?Ash1234 22:05, December 10, 2014 (UTC)Ash1234

move
We decided to drop the word "Arc." So that's exactly what I did. For example, "Search for Tsunade" now redirects to "Search for Tsunade." ~• WS7125 [Mod] 20:57, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm renaming them to the databook names and you decide to put deletion tags on them. Fine. I will not take part in any action regarding them. I'll let the community do what they want and keep my hands off the issue. ~• WS7125 [Mod]WindStar7125 Task.svgWindStar7125's Task.svg 20:59, December 11, 2014 (UTC)

Move page issue
Did you have to block him? And for three days? That's a little harsh. I understand he was moving pages back, but wouldn't a couple more warnings have worked? There's a possibility he didn't know what was going on, why not give him more warnings, rather than block him like a a trolling vandal? ~• WS7125 [Mod] 22:43, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * You blocked Lakers92 as well? What happened to the warning templates? I thought we used three warning templates and then a block. I really don't think he knew what was going on. ~• WS7125 [Mod]WindStar7125 Task.svgWindStar7125's Task.svg 22:54, December 11, 2014 (UTC)

Re:chat
Sorry, do you mean this or here?--LeafShinobi (talk) 00:44, December 12, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry wasn't available at the time.--Elve Talk Page 22:45, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

Episodes & Chapters
On some of the arc pages, they are missing the names and info of the episodes and chapters involved in it. I don't know how to edit that specfic content but if you can teach me, I'd be grateful. --Rai 水 (talk) 08:38, December 12, 2014 (UTC)

help
Hello .I was making the Arena. But can't make the template. Need some help. - Hollow Mario Hollow Mario (talk) 11:33, December 13, 2014 (UTC)

re:
Some titles were not in use for long enough to have "legacies" and are therefore not worth preserving as redirects. ~SnapperTo 19:15, December 13, 2014 (UTC)


 * Fated Battle Between Brothers ends at volume 44.
 * Pain's Assault (Arc) starts at volume 45.
 * Therefore, the contents of volume 44 do not belong in Pain's Assault. ~SnapperTo 18:53, December 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Listen to what I'm fucking telling you: the datatbook says that Pain's Assault starts at volume 45. Volume 45 starts at chapter 413. I am doing exactly what the databook says. ~SnapperTo 18:58, December 14, 2014 (UTC)

Apology
SuperSajuuk, I'm terribly sorry for making that mistake and causing you to get into it with Snapper2. If this is anyone's fault, it's mine. ~• WS7125 [Mod] 19:12, December 14, 2014 (UTC)

Re: databook arc info
The Sasuke & Itachi arc spans from chapter 380 to 412, the Pain arc from chapter 413 to 453. • Seelentau 愛 議 19:26, December 14, 2014 (UTC)

Current titles on Chapter & Episodes : Permission
Hey, Sajuuk would it be cool if I changed the Episodes/manga chapters mannually to the current titles for the Arcs? I just don't want it to be vandalism if I do, Thanks in advance! --New World God (talk) 15:15, December 15, 2014 (UTC)

Arc Names
First of all, the names are from the DVD releases, which are the official arc titles. Considering we were using official arc names for the manga arcs, I thought we might as well be as consistent as we can and use official arc names for the anime arcs too. Secondly, for the canon arcs, I didn't USE the official anime arc name. I just simply mentioned what it was called in the anime. Thirdly, Tsuchigumo Kinjutsu Arc to The Six-Tails Unleashed is simply what the Japanese DVD season called it, not me. I just translated the name (and trust me, the translation is correct). Lastly, I was unaware a new thread was opened once the voting thread was closed, so I didn't think anyone would bother to read or discuss filler arc titles cause a decision has been already made for the canon arcs and not too many people care about the filler arcs. I apologise for my edits and I will discuss it in the forum.--DuelMaster93 (talk) 18:04, December 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * Ok firstly, none of the arc names are matching exactly (some very similar but not matching), and how correct the arc names are shouldn't matter, as they are official arc names. I did not make these arc names up, they are official. I also share the same opinion, that some of them are blatantly wrong, but nevertheless they are official, and if we are using official arc names for canon arcs we should be as consistent as possible and use official arc names for the filler arcs, regardless of what they are called. This is why there is a short summary/synopsis at the top of each arc page. One could argue the Chikara arc name is official, but isn't specific enough about the actual arc's story. While we're on the topic, may I ask why the Chikara arc is the only filler arc to use it's official arc name? Yet another inconsistency. And just because the arc is non-canon, doesn't mean we shouldn't use official arc names, as they are still arcs and and still official. Even if some of arc names are wrong, at least they are official and consistent. And who said we can't use ~ or : in the title? A number of articles on the wiki have those in their titles.--DuelMaster93 (talk) 18:40, December 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * If you look at various episode pages such as Kakashi Chronicles ~ Boys' Life on the Battlefield ~ Part 1 and Enter: Naruto Uzumaki!, they contain ~ or : . I am not gonna list each one, but you see the point. Anyway, moving on, it doesn't have to come directly out of the author's mouth, manga or databook to be official in regards to the anime. Your point would be valid if the arc names came from another source, but these arc names are coming directly from Studio Perriot, who are in charge of the anime. By your logic since filler episodes aren't official we should just re-name them to what we want them to be because they're non-canon. Just like movies and video games, their titles are registered and trademarked, therefore making them official titles. When it comes to anime, if they studio that produces the anime release official titles, they are official unless or until the original mangaka states otherwise. And even though I already apologised and stated my reasons for editing without prior discussion once again, I apologise.--DuelMaster93 (talk) 19:11, December 16, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Reverting the anime-only arc
i got your message and I understand I made a mistake. so, right now. i'll be rechanging the arc names to the original and not so offical arcs. I hope you'd understand. thanks. Kunoichi101 (talk) 20:40, December 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * btw i'll take care the adventures at sea arc episode. and some episodes are made by mistake such as Konoha History Arc. Kunoichi101 (talk) 20:47, December 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * i'm done rechanging some story arc such as Tsuchigumo Kinjutsu Arc, Adventures at Sea Arc, and Shadow of the ANBU Arc. also changing some episodes to the actual arc like adventures at sea arc which you didn't mean to make a mistake. so i fixed changes for you. Kunoichi101 (talk) 20:56, December 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey, we have a little "problem" when Ten Tailed Fox decided to changed the anime-only "offical arcs", thus changing what DuelMaster did. what should we do now...? Kunoichi101 (talk) 23:25, December 16, 2014 (UTC)

Re: err ...
I'm doing things that should have been done a while ago. For example, let's say an arc is said to spans from chapters 454 to 483. Events from chapter 453 aren't supposed to be there, correct? That's exactly what I'm doing. Altering the summaries to match the chapter limits. I should have done that while we were altering the chapter numbers, but I had no time to do so. So I'm doing that now. ~• WS7125 [Mod] 21:36, December 21, 2014 (UTC)

RE: re: file moves
Noted.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 01:43, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

Edits
I have proof. First, the databooks (and by extent Yamato) mention that Medical Ninjutsu breathe life into the target, which is the same description as Yang Release. Also, Naruto-Jesus powers = Medical Ninjutsu, and we all know that was done using Yang Release.--TruthSeeker149 (talk) 18:39, December 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * Just like Sasuke has Yin Release (Genjutsu used against Sakura) and Genjutsu (like Madara), Naruto has Yang Release and Medical Ninjutsu (like Hashirama), given by the Sage of Six Paths, this is not speculation, this is fact. And it doesn't take a brainiac to realize that...--TruthSeeker149 (talk) 18:41, December 24, 2014 (UTC)

Itachi's timeline
My edit wasn't as a sign of intrusion but as sign to fix clear mistakes. I even put my reasons in the talk page. Why would you want a wrongful timeline. ZabuzaTheDemon (talk) 23:39, December 24, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Request
I'll consider it when you stop editing the content of people's posts. Poor form.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 19:12, December 25, 2014 (UTC)


 * Then I am free to continue to refer to you as your original username Spey. And there's no reason to bring this up again, I feel. Cheers. Happy Christmas.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 19:18, December 25, 2014 (UTC)


 * You can keep editting my posts. I really don't care. I do find it worrisome when the power to edit someone's posts is used for any number of reasons the editor sees fit. If what they say is offending, call them out for it. But if it isn't so bad that it's very presence is ruining the life of the wikia, then one wielding the power should go in and edit it. Standard forum etiquette; users don't like it when an admin edits their posts. And you do so constantly. It creates a lack of faith. Yes I'm aware of what the policy (which if I remember correctly, you made) but that doesn't mean it should be used. Integrity is important. (Integrity from the guy who uses fear to keep people in line. I is funny.)
 * And yes I will continue to call you Spey. And no this isn't a matter of disrespect. Had that been my intention, I wouldn't even refer to you with a name.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 19:29, December 25, 2014 (UTC)

wikipedia:Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines ~SnapperTo 01:11, December 26, 2014 (UTC)

Message
Then how do you suppose i contact him? I cant do it on vsbattle because i was blocked....

Forum Warning #1
''"I think the entire holiday is as primitive as our species can get. It's called Christmas, yet it's about lying to children that there's a fat old man wearing red with snow-white beard who rides his flying reindeer all over the world, to slide down everyone's chimney to gift children. Oh, he even lives at the north pole and has elven assistants, too.

''Christmas ISN'T a Christian holiday contrary to what many believe, it's a mishmash of pagan traditions, there's no good reason for either Christians or otherwise to celebrate it, it's unbiblical. The Santa thing is over the top nonsense and there's no real evidence at all that Jesus was born on 25th December of any year.

''So if you happen to celebrate magical fat old men in red or cosmic zombie Jews, then you most likely do simply because, well... everyone else does, which if you think about isn't a good reason at all."

'''Is this, by no means, disruptive to the discussion at hand? How about that, then:'''

"I don't know. If I ever have children, I won't brainwash them with false promises. Your son's world may break apart once he finds out what he's been happy about was all false."

'''So why am I the only one who got a Forum Warning? Why do you support/ignore your friends and then bash out on others? Not really hypocrisy so much as a double standard there.'''

Ps.: Please delete the previous message. I messed up. lol

Blaezej (talk) 13:28, December 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Very well. Blaezej (talk) 20:39, January 4, 2015 (UTC)

Variation
Regarding the Adamantine Sealing Chains, why would we use a variation of the technique for the infobox image? Cerez put that image there and 1 user changed it, so i put it back. There's no edit war. --Kris.gilson.12 (talk) 22:25, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * There wouldn't have to be a edit war if Windstar hadn't remove the variation section, as the image and information related to that belongs there. I know this is not the article talkpage, but am i right in saying that the article needs a variation section? --Kris.gilson.12 (talk) 22:42, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * And you're mentioning my name because...? There was no need for a "variation section," Adamantine Attacking Chains has its own article, so it was redundant and utterly pointless to put the same damn thing in the Adamantine Sealing Chains article as a "variation section" when it, again, has its own article. I haven't changed any image, so please, don't blame me for any "edit war" because you don't like something. ~• WS7125 [Mod]WindStar7125 Task.svgWindStar7125's Task.svg 23:01, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^ What he said (stahp flooding my email inbox >_>) --Sajuuk Talk Page 23:04, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * You were in the right Windstar in removing the Kirin content, no one is disputing that. All i am saying it that the technique through Naruto belongs in a variation section unless we want an article called "Transcription Seal: Adamantine Sealing Chains". --Kris.gilson.12 (talk) 23:13, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * Can you please take this somewhere else? I answered your question, you don't need a big long discussion with other users on my talkpage. If you want a different imageo n the infobox, you bring it up on the article's talkpage. --Sajuuk Talk Page 23:22, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to butt in but people rarely reply on article talk pages, i can vouch for that as 1 of my questions regarding the infobox image is yet to be acknowledge. And im gonna revert it back to the way it was before, so if you have an issue bring it up on the talkpage --Sarutobii2 (talk) 06:21, December 30, 2014 (UTC)

Question
Hey, do you also see some weird stuff going on in 's File history? Happy new year btw! :) Norleon (talk) 16:20, January 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * I see, I leave it to you then! :) Norleon (talk) 17:30, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

Hey
That's wasn't me. Somebody else copied it from his page. please forgive me.
 * Okay, I'm very sorry about what happened. I promise I will make it up to you.--AlexHoskins (talk) 23:32, January 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added your links in the copied Naruto pages in Heroes Wiki. A few pages are not completely copied to your wiki.--AlexHoskins (talk) 01:16, January 2, 2015 (UTC)
 * I know that we are getting into the bad start and I apologized about all of the misunderstanding. It's just that I was, you know, jealous about all the praise that the Villains Wiki has more than the Heroes Wiki. I was trying to bring more contributors to join the Heroes Wiki. Again, so very sorry. Do you ever forgive me? --AlexHoskins (talk) 20:13, January 3, 2015 (UTC

OK, I admit it. I've had copied most of the pages but only in Heroes Wiki not Villains. I'll try to make up my own words and photos. I am so sorry.--AlexHoskins (talk) 23:46, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Settei
Here's what I have so far ItachiWasAHero (talk) 20:51, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

https://www.dropbox.com/photos

Re: Rollback
I've already used the edit summary though so... and not every user notices the "You have new messages" balloon at the bottom right of their page? Huh. I read the policy, it says the rollback flag is to revert obvious vandalism. That's what Zkelvln is doing (at least, I thought so after I told him/her multiple times to stop). I did just that, reverted the vandalism, and asked him/her to stop on his/her talkpage multiple times. But if I'm abusing it according to you, hey, I'll listen to you then. Though I always use the edit summary when reverting edits and always tell other editors to do the same, and I use the rollback function when it's obvious vandalism. And the policy doesn't say "not everyone notices their talkpage" So... I'm quite confused here. I guess my interpretation of the policy differs from yours just a little bit. Though, I'll gladly take your advice.  ~•WS7125 [Mod] 00:11, January 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks for the advice.  ~•WS7125 [Mod]WindStar7125 Task.svgWindStar7125's Task.svg 00:22, January 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * I do admit I've been touchy with it. But I did not know that users didn't notice multiple messages on their talkpage, and I assumed it was vandalism after I told them on their talkpage it was false information. I will try my best not to use it too much like I have done.  ~•WS7125 [Mod]WindStar7125 Task.svgWindStar7125's Task.svg 00:27, January 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * ._. Wait, you just told me assume good faith as a wiki-wide principle, and then you removed this? Confused again.  ~•WS7125 [Mod]WindStar7125 Task.svgWindStar7125's Task.svg 00:29, January 4, 2015 (UTC)

Suggestion for categories
Can I suggest that we could add alignment for characters? Like Good for good characters, Neutral for neutral ones and Evil for evil ones.

About photos
I have a problem with adding photos. I added Naruto characters rosters with real information so I wouldn't get in trouble for violating image policy, but they ended up deleted. Are there any photos you want me to add?--AlexHoskins (talk) 16:47, January 5, 2015 (UTC)

Re: fanon
Ok, I'll remove the images of my profile. Sorry for the confusion. → Hyūga_Symbol.svg Rafael Uchiha  Uchiha_Symbol.svg  17:26, January 6, 2015 (UTC)

arcs
The episode was released today. I was gonna create the episode page but it wouldn't let me cause it was automatically identified as harmful. I wouldn't of created the page if there were no episodes released.--DuelMaster93 (talk) 11:47, January 8, 2015 (UTC)

Fair enough then. I was unaware of that rule. I had seen episode pages created before where only the information in the infobox was present. Anyway, I apologise.--DuelMaster93 (talk) 11:56, January 8, 2015 (UTC)

Confusion
Im still confused about the Hanzo matter but after reading your reply in the episode discussion, 2 things that i didn't understand were

"When the third war finished, it's stated that Hanzo's rule declined and it was during this time that Pain staged a civil war and killed Hanzo" Did it say Hanzo was killed shortly after it started because if not, hanzo could of died anytime from the start of it to sometime before Jiriya vs Pain.

And secondly "Nagato (through Pain) already ruled in Amegakure at the end of Part 1, through the scene of them convening, which would have already indicated that Hanzo was dead at that point." I might be completely clueless but how does the akatsuki having a meeting mean Pain was the leader of Amegakure? Correct me if im wrong on anything. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 20:31, January 8, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Poll
i'm not sure Simant did warn me about the poll changing, but i remembered he warned me about the archiving talk page. Kunoichi101 (talk) 20:50, January 9, 2015 (UTC)

My threads
I see that the thread got closed, which I kinda saw coming since this is you we're talking about and it had been going on for a while. As for the fanon wiki, they actually find the thing a "clutter" and made me put everything on my user page on that site. I honestly don't know what to say about that. Anyway, the real reason I'm talking right out is because I had a question. Do threads get deleted after a while, or do they stay on the wiki permanantly? Because I need time to take everything everyone said and update what I wrote.Gemnist (talk) 20:01, January 10, 2015 (UTC)Gemnist


 * I never tried to say that you close threads for fun; it was more that you have dominion over them, which is something no one can deny since you're a forum moderator. I also acknowledge that the threads have been going on for a while now, which is wy I'm cool with this. Either way, thanks for the info; it's good to know the threads are up there permanantly (by the way you forgot the other two, lol).Gemnist (talk) 20:10, January 10, 2015 (UTC)Gemnist

Boruto Movie Characters
Im pretty sure Hinata Borutos Mother and Narutos Wife will be in the movie same goes for Himawari.--Dragonir11 (talk) 19:40, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

Lyrics
Did you never listen to this to see my lyrics are correct? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsFR4CmolkM-- --Dragonir11 (talk) 19:43, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

What Im saying read Kunoichis101s lyrics while listening to the song there are discerpencies. Her lyrics also dont go with the english translation on Star Vessel.--Dragonir11 (talk) 19:56, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

Im not saying check my translation. You said that Google Translate is incorrect and i know that now. The lyrics I tried to put are incorrect. Im saying that the lyrics on the page are wrong. If you look at the romaji lyrics on Star Vessel page and then look at the english lyrics on the same page theres something wrong. Both Lyrics are wrong.--Dragonir11 (talk) 20:07, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Chat
Thanks for the advice, but I'm perfectly fine with the Monobook skin. I like its simplicity. :) I've edited using the official Wikia skin before during school sometimes as an anonymous user on other wikias. I found myself not liking it very much. I don't care for the enhancements, and I don't go on the chat a lot, either. So, I really don't have a reason to change over to the default skin.-- Ninja Sheik  23:15, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, they do. I don't to the forums much, though. If the Monoskin is likely to get remove, then I'll just keep using it until it does.-- Ninja Sheik  23:19, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

Re:
-- WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 23:26, January 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Nothing's wrong. However, personal events in my real life have affected my motivation to do certain things. Editing and moderating are among those things. Just letting you know. Though I will still be here and monitor the wiki on a constant basis.
 * 2) Also, for a while I've thought about being as basic and simplistic as possible. The blanking and removing of things are an example of that.
 * 3) Nah, I don't really feel like chatting much at the moment.
 * No, it hasn't been greatly affected. I'll still will watch over the forums and the chat, and edit the wiki. I'll be just as active as before. What's affected is not my activity, but rather how I edit. I mean I will try not be as... assertive as before, if you catch my drift. I don't feel any pressure as an op either, to let you know. But I will still be around as much as before.
 * --WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 23:41, January 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * Do not worry, I manage my time just fine. Though I do understand that assertiveness is necessary (especially in the forums), all I am saying is that I will try to do so only when necessary (such as, supporting your decisions, and the like). I have not thrown it all away you know. Just to clarify.
 * --WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 23:52, January 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * Though, as a final suggestion: I do wish for someone to request Dantman to further clarify the rights of sysops and forum moderators in the forums, considering the disputes between you and the sysops have left me quite confused if the sysops are even allowed to manage the forums as well. --WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 00:37, January 13, 2015 (UTC)

Re: thread closings
1) I get in trouble when I ignore forum requests. I get in trouble when I take forum requests. Whatdoyawantfrommeeh?

2) If I deem the reason to not be good, I am also within my rights to reopen said threads, He-Who-Complains-When-I-Call-Him-His-First-Name. A versus thread is a versus thread. It is about Naruto and another fandom, but it is still about Naruto. But if it makes you cry into your pillow I will not open it again He-Who-Complains-When-I-Call-Him-His-First-Name.

And I could care less if you want to get huffy and puffy and "Oh big bad sysops trying to get me down" He-Who-Complains-When-I-Call-Him-His-First-Name. Your rights as forum mod doesn't make you the sole decision maker there. It's about time you remember that. Have a lovely day.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 23:48, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

Chat
If possible, could you make it?--Omojuze (talk) 18:47, January 17, 2015 (UTC)

RE:Archiving
I just followed what it said to do over in the Help:Archiving page but i'll do what you suggest for next time. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 13:37, January 19, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Is there...
There's an explanation right in that sentence as to why I do that. Furthermore, please don't write to me again. Ever. I don't want to put up with your "problems", so if you ever got one, pelase refer to another sysop or go to Dantman. Oh and you're not really in the position to remind someone who worked for seven years as a Sysop, how he has to behave. I'm very well aware of what my job is and what isn't. There's no common ground for us to ever talk to another. So yeah, I'd rather have you stop that. • Seelentau 愛 議 18:06, January 19, 2015 (UTC)
 * Frankly, I don't give a shit about your opinion on my behaviour or what I write to whom, as well as my position as a sysop. So I'm not going to respond to you any further. Have a good day. • Seelentau 愛 議 18:25, January 19, 2015 (UTC)

re: Chat
Because that went over so well the last time.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 18:33, January 19, 2015 (UTC)

If it's about Seelentau, then with all due respect, I'm not a psychologist.--Elve Talk Page 22:54, January 20, 2015 (UTC)

Well, you are free to post it on my talkpage for everyone to see.--Elve Talk Page 23:03, January 20, 2015 (UTC)

re: classifications
The article states: "Hiruko used his chimera technique to steal kekkei genkai from an unknown shinobi which allowed him to use x release" or so. For Guren, Crystal is listed as a kekkei genkai in her article, doesn't make sense for it not to be considered one in its own article, consistency.--Elve Talk Page 16:36, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, I haven't seen the movie, ask those who did. For Guren, if a nature isn't a basic one, it's an advanced nature and all advanced natures so far have been kekkei genkai/tota/mora whatever.--Elve Talk Page 17:03, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * I saw the movie, and there it was stated that Dark, Steel and Swift Releases were kekkei genkai.--JOA2017:10, January 20, 2015 (UTC)

Can you...
Explain this to me? First, he added an interwiki link, then a KKG classification to the article, (Which I recall you had a misunderstanding with Elveonora about) and you just rollback'd all of it. Why exactly did you not just undo the edit and use the edit summary? I assumed reverting using the rollback function was only for vandalism, and you told me not to use the rollback function unless there is obvious vandalism or persistent restoring of edits, and assume good faith (which is why I do not intentionally use the rollback function anymore, unless there is vandalism or it was an accidental click). When I last intentionally used the rollback function, it was to revert a speculative edit, but you told me to use the undo button first (which I have taken heed of) then I see you give the same reasoning to Elveonora about using the rollback function on an edit you deemed speculative. I understand that I had a very itchy rollback finger (not accusing you of that), but it looks to me like you told me one thing and did the other. So rather than use the edit summary like you told me, why did you use the rollback function on those edits, which were clearly of good-faith? Not trying to blast nor criticize you (at all, believe me), but I am asking this because now I am extremely confused as to what you told me on my talkpage about the function not too long ago about "[using] Undo in the first instance to explain the reason BEFORE using rollback." (By the way, you already told me about the rollback function, you do not have to tell me twice, but all I ask for is an explanation for why you did what you did). -- WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 22:06, January 20, 2015 (UTC)

Scuffle in the Forum
After reviewing Seelentau's post and the posts of several others including your last one, I have come to the conclusion that nothing Seelentau said, while incredibly heavy handed and forceful, was not trolling or attacking anyone, and certainly not enough for you to call him out in the clearly hostile way you did. As such, I would suggest under no circumstances should you engate in him directly any further. If he does/do something that you disagree with let another sysop know and do not engage him; this includes deleting his forum messages as that does absolutely nothing but make things worse. From where I'm sitting, you seem incapable of addressing anything Seelentau does without it being a "abuse of power" attack and in doing so further spreads the flames. So once again, if Seelentau does something you disagree with, let a 3rd party sort it out themselves to resolve it. Thank you.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 14:28, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Understood.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 15:23, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Worth asking, but do you have an copy of the email or a screen capture to verify this?--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 15:25, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Very well then.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 15:29, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * It was a deleted message. I thought they were supposed to be removed. I just put it back in the thread to avoid the ass-hattery I mentioned and as I stated, I needed it.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 15:31, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * If you don't mind, and please be brief. Why was Emphxtic's "Owned" left as is? If anything I would think that was a direct snipe at Seelentau, but nobody seemed to bat an eyelash. I mean the entire message wouldn't even need to be removed. Just the clear snipe at another user.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 15:41, January 21, 2015 (UTC)

Use of "cannot edit own talk page" blocks
Please read Thread:160630. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 23:46, January 21, 2015 (UTC)

Mohamed adel
SuperSajuuk, can you explain Mohamed adel's block.

I believe that when you asked, [ I told you] that you're better off letting sysops handle blocks for wiki vandalism unless you're trying to stop an ongoing flood.

But in this instance it appears you've: ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 01:12, January 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked a user for wiki vandalism, not forum abuse.
 * Done it at the same time as giving them a warning, instead of blocking them on a repeat.
 * Then upgraded it to a "cannot edit own talk page" block for a message removal not only without giving them a warning first, but without bothering to give them an explanation about our talkpage policy at all.
 * If you dispute a block like that bring it to my attention, don't use it as the guideline for how you make blocks.
 * The user made all those moves over the course of 5 minutes ending with the page back where it came from. Your block was made over 45 minutes later when they had already stopped that and made a different edit. As far as blocking goes "repeat" behaviour is not multiples of the same thing done all at once, it's something done again after receiving a warning the first time.
 * As long as we have sysops that come on periodically it doesn't matter what hours they're available. Blocks are rarely things that need to be done immediately. The only time a block is urgent is when a user is currently and continually engaging in vandalism/harassment and either ignoring the warnings or not reading their talkpage.
 * For all this normal vandalism please just pretend you don't have the block right and use the requests page like all the other users. Lowering the average response time for non-forum blocks is not what the block right on your Forum Operator flag is for.
 * ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 02:34, January 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * Now isn't the time to use chat. A) I should be sleeping. B) Right now methods of communication without a trail should be avoided. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 10:28, January 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * Heh, Wikia creating their own de facto proprietary method of communication threw out all the tools like IRC bots that let chats be recorded. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 10:33, January 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * In any case, it's currently past 2:30AM for me, and I've got too involved in the Narutopedia today, to the impediment of other things I have to do. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 10:38, January 22, 2015 (UTC)

You and Sel
SuperSajuuk, staff are wanting both you and Sel to cool off and focus on moderating the other users.

I looked through Thread:160121 and comments like "Who cares about the anime, seriously?" are not personal insults, they don't target individual users and they aren't meant to degrade. In the first place the target of this comment appears to have been the anime and its authors, not people who watch it. You were fine to mention the users that care about the anime, but bringing in comments like "I advise you desist such behaviour in forum threads" was far from necessary. Take this both as a note that the bar for what warrants administrative action is too low and that speech like that should be avoided in a first warning.

Frankly, it looks like if you hadn't intervened at all the topic would have simply continued along without any long argument or anyone feeling hurt. Rather than your moderation reducing disputes your presence acted as a catalyst creating one.

You need to be wary of diving straight into warnings or including mentions of the use of things like blocks into early warnings. This kind of high handed speech not only catalyzes and inflames disputes but also makes the place unwelcoming to newbies that trip over a policy. Wikipedia's guidelines like assume good faith and WP:BEANS are good advice to start with here.

Also,

You shouldn't be waving around the TOU. The TOU is enforced by staff, staff decide what is and isn't a TOU violation. And the abuse, harassment, etc... in there is there for serious extremes, not bickering between a wiki's admins/mods. If his comments were seriously TOU violations you should have talked to staff right then instead of moderating them yourself.

Finally,

It's probably best if for now, for any topic you're too personally involved in, you leave reply removing and thread closing to WindStar or someone else.

~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 07:40, January 23, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Moderators
I checked out the rights changes and sent the request. Afterwards maybe I should ask if it's easy to remove the Moderator group. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 08:01, January 23, 2015 (UTC)
 * Too lazy to create a new topic, and since it is related to this, I happened to notice here that apparently, sysops can add the new moderator group. -- WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 00:02, January 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * What I was trying to say is that since sysops can apparently add the moderator group, allowing us to move threads and messages in the forums again, why not ask a sysop to give us the rights? -- WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 00:08, January 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. So now what? We can no longer move/remove threads, delete comments and other things like we used to before the update. -- WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 00:12, January 24, 2015 (UTC)

Re: VisualEditor
That's not Wikia's old editor, that's the MediaWiki VisualEditor Wikimedia has been working on and is in use on Wikipedia. It also has a source mode and has a number of fundamental differences from every previous WYSIWYG editor attempt that rid it of the many bugs that plagued every other attempt. ~ Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (Local Talk &#8285; Animanga Talk) 01:23, January 24, 2015 (UTC)