User talk:Munchvtec

Appearance
Great to see you're back. I was thinking about something; you are rather good a written something for an appearance section right? --Kasan94 (talk) 19:40, April 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * Great! I'll send you the character if I find some then. Can't remember right now, the ones I found before. --Kasan94 (talk) 23:09, April 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure thing, I will try and find them as soon as possible. --Kasan94 (talk) 23:14, April 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * And that is very good, I appreciate it a lot. Some of those I will be sending your way, will already have an appearance section, but it is very very short, but I'm sure you'll find it all out. --Kasan94 (talk) 23:18, April 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Shin'emon, Akio, Todoroki, Gantetsu, Sagi, Ōwashi, Hōki (Watari). More will probably come latter. Thanks! --Kasan94 (talk) 23:23, April 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Uroko Kurama, Murakumo Kurama, Unkai Kurama, Gosunkugi, Komei, Hotarubi, Sumaru. Just make them whenever you get the time, there is no haste at all. --Kasan94 (talk) 23:29, April 12, 2014 (UTC)

Nice, good find guys. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 23:37, April 14, 2014 (UTC)

Yeah in part one, we don't know Sexy Jutsu's height for Shippuden Naruto. But good call. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 17:28, April 16, 2014 (UTC)

That's great Munch. I'll keep 'em coming if I find more. --Kasan94 (talk) 20:12, April 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * I found some more: En no Gyoja, Akaboshi, Nango, Seimei. And this one need a personality section (I believe he says something in the episodes, which could give something to that section) --Kasan94 (talk) 20:22, April 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * Looks really good! --Kasan94 (talk) 17:12, April 23, 2014 (UTC)

seems like people hate me cause of that it's fine Shaduw-Chan 16:04, April 24, 2014 (UTC)

if you don't mind i am not taking it down it's my choice to put it there i don't care what others thing take me as being rude but i don't like others that are not sysop's to tell me what i can not put for my info i will be nice about it your don't like it leave me alone please Shaduw-Chan 16:17, April 24, 2014 (UTC)

Articles filling
Can you write the appearance and personality sections about Tarō‎‎ and Jirō? Thanks so much.. — Shakhmoot  (Talk) 19:42, April 24, 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm making a List under this, where you can delete the names as you get them done, should be a bit easier I think:

--Kasan94 (talk) 13:43, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sasame - Appearance
 * Kagero - Appearance
 * Akio - Appearance
 * Todoroki - Appearance
 * Gantetsu - Appearance
 * Hoki - Appearance
 * Gosunkugi - Appearance
 * Hotarubi - Appearance
 * Sumaru - Appearance
 * En no Gyoja - Appearance
 * Akaboshi - Appearance
 * Seimei - Appearance
 * Tsuchigumo Chief - Personality
 * Tarō‎‎ - Appearance & Personality
 * Jirō - Appearance & Personality
 * Stone Carver - Appearance
 * Stone Carver's Assistant - Appearance
 * Genno - Appearance & Personality
 * Kusune - Appearance
 * Kirisame - Appearance
 * Kaede Yoshino - Appearance
 * Genie - Appearance
 * Tezuna - Appearance
 * Amachi - Appearance & Personality
 * Kujaku - Appearance & Personality
 * You can make them just as you see fit. I'm not that good in filling them, so I'm happy you can do it. --Kasan94 (talk) 16:35, May 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * That sounds really good! Even though they are only minor characters I still think it's important for the site. --Kasan94 Nara Symbol.svg Talkpage 20:47, May 30, 2014 (UTC)

Jovo2209's block
He will most likely be blocked, the only problem is when. I already requested his block to Jacce. All we can do now is wait.--JOA20 (talk) 13:43, May 14, 2014 (UTC)

re: problem
There ain't any personal one at all and I definitely don't follow you around, I just say/write what I think at a given moment ;) Honesty is better than lie imo--Elveonora (talk) 18:47, May 14, 2014 (UTC)

Spacing
Can you please stop placing spaces in between every single character or place name in your comments? It is very irritating and makes it hard to read what you are saying. Thanks. --Speysider Talk Page 12:11, May 16, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Forehead zetsu thing
Please go back and read that discussion. The one person that kind of agreed with you ended up telling you that it was indistinguishable. The word "indistinguishable" doesn't mean you add it to trivia.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 15:56, May 20, 2014 (UTC)

You were online since then, so...
...I'm sure you've read this, right? How about it? Norleon (talk) 16:40, May 21, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Block
That's not called blocking; it's called reverting. My guess is that they reverted it because the original databook entry does not say anything about the number of heads. So, you should try adding reference to your information.--~Ultimate Supreme  13:16, May 23, 2014 (UTC)


 * To clarify: that revert was done in error. Had I been adamant about it, the 32 teeth information would not be in the article now. While you do have a knack of finding and misconstruing even the minute if information — and apparently you are yet another person that has an issue with me "just because" — I will ask that next time you bring your issues directly to me. Also, I don't have admin rights so I can't "try" to block you.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 14:22, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Edits
Yes. It shouldn't be added yet until it's been decided. I've reverted some as well. ~ IndxcvNovelist →talk • contribs • watty← 16:12, May 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * Haha really? You're not the only one. Some people thought the same as well. I thought my username's girly enough. ~ IndxcvNovelist →talk • contribs • watty← 18:00, June 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * That's nice! Thanks for having time to read my user page. :) ~ IndxcvNovelist →talk • contribs • watty← 17:40, June 3, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Rollbacker
I cannot do that, I don't have an ability to.--LeafShinobi (talk) 08:57, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't know I can. But I think that maybe you should ask some other user.--LeafShinobi (talk) 09:10, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * You don't really need the ability to rollback anything Munchvtec, I rarely see you revert any kind of vandalism, nor do we need any more rollbacks. 15 is enough. --Speysider Talk Page 09:34, June 16, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Ty
You're very welcome. My biggest belief in life is common courtesy and respect for one another. I can't stand it when others belittle those who are not as powerful or influential as them, and I always feel the need to call those people out on their rudeness. Thanks for believing in my same ideals! --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 18:46, July 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * It's pretty much like high school. With the exceptions of a few (Shakhmoot, Speysider, and a few others), all of the admins and SYSOPs are like the cool kids, and everyone else is irrelevant, useless, and can do no good. --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 23:54, July 8, 2014 (UTC)

Re: BTW
Alright thanks --Kasan94  Talkpage 13:27, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yea no problem there, he makes a joke in the episode and everything, so plenty of time to take a pic. --Kasan94 Nara Symbol.svg Talkpage 13:30, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * I wasn't uncertain whether or not I should make it, since I have a name and image. The uncertain point here is which name should he have, since one name have a Japanese voice actor, and the other an English, it fits rather good I would say. --Kasan94 Nara Symbol.svg Talkpage 13:34, August 11, 2014 (UTC)

Sections
Please do not feel the need to add a a Personality/Abilities/Appearance section to every character's article. Some characters aren't seen for long enough for anything to be said about them. ~SnapperTo 20:27, August 18, 2014 (UTC)


 * If all you're going to do for an Appearance section is describe the picture that's already in the article, I don't really see the point.
 * For Personality, please try to exercise restraint. For example: personality traits that a character "seems" to have are probably not worth mentioning. ~SnapperTo 22:33, August 19, 2014 (UTC)

re: Simant
Simant has only been inactive for a few months. The most the wiki has done is remove inactive rollback users, but ShounenSuki (the wiki's primary translator) left the wiki years ago and still has a sysop flag. So, from that, probably inactive sysops don't get their rights removed. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 12:51, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * What he said.~Ultimate Supreme  14:26, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

Re: apology
I accept your apology. However, it is starting to become a trend, so you may need to start considering taking small breaks from the wiki if you feel stressed. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 12:56, August 22, 2014 (UTC)

Your welcome(Spyrocks (talk) 15:47, August 22, 2014 (UTC))

re: indents
Nope. See Help:Talk pages for how to do it. If you still don't understand, use source mode editing on a talkpage. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 16:19, August 22, 2014 (UTC)

re: Hi
Just small grammar and spelling mistakes. Corrected that, no big deal though.--Elveonora (talk) 12:45, August 25, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Re: Appearance Sections
Sure I will try to look into it, when I get the time. I'm not with my usual computer atm, so maybe this weekend. --Kasan94  Talkpage 13:25, August 25, 2014 (UTC)

Can try, but with those episodes I remember that there are a watermark in the corner in which her face is (in this specific picture). But can try to see if there are some other I can use --Kasan94  Talkpage 15:09, August 26, 2014 (UTC)

Personality sections
Two things: •Cerez 365 ™(talk) 14:08, September 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Please stop adding personality sections for characters who we save not seen enough of to determine such. You're basically adding one line of fodder to their article.
 * 2) Personality sections go before Appearance ones.
 * ^ Conur with Cerez. These edits are getting quite pointless and frankly, are going to get looked at as being edit count padding, your not improving the wiki in any way by adding these things to articles. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 15:11, September 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Because, it's like Cerez said: You're basically adding one line of fodder to their article.
 * Also, you might want to try reading Project:Rules:
 * Do not make pointless articles. If you see one, put tag on.
 * The spirit of the rules is not to make pointless edits in general, a lot of your "personality" section edits are pointless and do not improve the wiki in any way, therefore they will be considered edit count padding. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 18:19, September 3, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Aoba's personality
I was the one who wrote Aoba's personality section and I took it directly from the databook character particulars provided by ShounenSuki and that wasn't there. If you have information that can corroborate his vole demeanor, please feel free to link me to it.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 06:53, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

It takes information from all 3 databooks. It's available on the site if you want to check. Now do you have a reference link for the information you added or no? —Cerez 365 ™(talk) 07:01, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

Right because it takes the same translations and "Americanizes" them.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 15:00, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

Re; Team 7's talk page
Read my response in the talk page, please.--Reliops (talk) 06:43, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I mostly argue in contentious talk pages, which is when I can get less polite out of frustration. I try to tone down on the fringe arguments and stick to the points that matter to avoid though, nowadays.--Reliops (talk) 06:58, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

Not to worry!
Not to nitpick, but I never said it was Sasuke's Jutsu, I said it was a type of space-time portal, using kamui, which would make it Obito's technique. My mistake was thinking it was a general Space-Time portal page, not specific to Kaguya's techique. Not to mention my lack of experience with the rules on editing in general! :)

Convo
I'm 15 on the 27thRiptide240 (talk) 04:01, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

YesRiptide240 (talk) 10:58, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Edits
Never thought I'd say this, but thank god for the auto-complete on my phone. Everything happen with just one touch. -- WindStar7125   04:39, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and you almost have 3,000 edits. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 04:40, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh. Someone must of removed it. By the way, do you see a "Thread:Sasuke Uchiha" link in the Rinnegan infobox? Cuz I do. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 04:55, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh OK, thanks. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 05:04, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

re: profile page
Not much to say about myself I'm afraid. Everything there's to be known about me is obvious through the way I express. Also a profile page doesn't make a better editor, does it? Omnibender doesn't have one either--Elveonora (talk) 08:51, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * What good does it make for others to know how old you are, that you hang on youtube, what videogames and anime you like and that your girlfriend isn't into them? I don't think my personal information is any relevant to a website dedicated to documentation of "Naruto" nor is it anyone's business. There's facebook for that and even there, my profile is almost empty, I don't feel the need to brag about myself and to be honest even if I felt the need, there wouldn't be much to brag about.
 * I'm very honest and straightforwards person, so if you are interested in what I think, chances are that I already let you know what I think. That's how I make myself visible, I don't need a profile for that with: "hey, look at all the cool things about me that you don't give a **** about, neither you should"--Elveonora (talk) 09:08, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it should be used primarily about your biography as a wikia editor rather than a real life one.--Elveonora (talk) 09:14, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * The Userpage policy does say that your userpage should talk about you as an editor and not be a personal userpage... --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 10:09, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

Team Kakashi
All is forgiven. It's not an official mission, but called one nonetheless. I have no complains. Also, I'm glad to see another humble user on here :) --Questionaredude (talk) 04:03, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Profile
Yeah, hey there :) Hope things are doing fine with you!

For your profile page, I think a 4 would do. Better than mine :p --Hisana456 (talk) 04:17, September 9, 2014 (UTC)Hisana456

Thanks :-) --Hisana456 (talk) 04:28, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Re:admin rights???
Are you like creeping on random talkpages? Never mind that, it just surprises me you have time to read talkpages of other users. It was a long time ago. I just remember the interface changed one day, suddenly there were more options to choose. As seen from the Wiki activity there aren't many active users there, so the flag proves useful, particularly with duplicate questions.--Vecanoi (talk) 05:03, September 9, 2014 (UTC)


 * No problem.--Vecanoi (talk) 05:07, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

I fell asleep
I was very tired, there was alot of stuff on my mind/spirit, my body was overwelmed at the work out with the strongest man in Alabama.

So yeah, im sorry.

(Spyrocks (talk) 19:27, September 11, 2014 (UTC))

Re: Chat
I should be on later today. It was fun, so hope to see you there ^^  Yuri Bara   Message me 20:18, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Help
No idea, sorry. But to be honest, I wouldn't recommend you to create bigger articles. Don't take this offensive, but I think you might be a little too unexperienced for that, despite your best efforts. • Seelentau 愛 議 18:14, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

I know how to create articles, but I'm not sure what you're asking, exactly. Create articles without templates? Why do you need to create this for, anyway?-- Ninja Sheik  19:29, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Ah, the anime profiles. I have those books, as well. In any case, I wouldn't know. I don't create templates on any of the wikias I edit on. Sorry. But I have to agree with Seel-san here. If you don't have any experience with working on templates, you should practice working them before creating any pages. Also, if you want to ask someone who does know how to work on them, you can't just ask random users. Usually, you have about, like, two or three users who are experienced with templates. I believe User:Simant is one of them.-- Ninja Sheik  19:37, September 13, 2014 (UTC)


 * UltimateSupreme may be more of an appropriate person to contact, as Simant has been long gone for months and shows no signs of returning to the wiki at this time. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 11:07, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

Re:good job
Thank you! Yes, when I was editing Toki's article, I thought "why not go through some other articles as well"? It's surprisingly a lot of fun actually. :) Norleon (talk) 17:15, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

So...
I don't know what's going on, but your edits are incredibly sloppy, to the point of useless: Please take this on board. --Sajuuk Talk Page 17:31, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Please don't make edits like this to talk to people, talkpages were made for that.
 * 2) Don't make a line of edits in a row, one after the other, making larger edits is advised, as well as using the preview button to see if it displays properly.
 * 3) Don't double post in the forums, just edit your posts if you want to add something, instead of making 2+ posts in a row.
 * I know you left a message to Kind-Hearted-One, I left this here as a record that I had to tell you about your edits, as an edit summary is not a record of a user telling another that their edit was useless. --Sajuuk Talk Page 17:41, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Book Template
Can't you just create it like a databook page?~Ultimate Supreme  18:56, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

On the topic of my edit to the Konohamaru page I object to your unedit as the information was not included on the character's biography despite the inclusion of the Ash Pile Burning technique Konohamaru only uses in the same OVA. I noted that the information may not be canon and did not change the characters rank to reflect the OVA. That's why it was in the trivia and why I have done a re-edit. 845933 (talk) 05:58, September 16, 2014 (UTC)845933

"Sense"
I don't want to sound like a dick, but I see you making this mistake on a constant level, like in your profile: "...I have been a dedicated follower ever sense". It's "since", not "sense". Iloveinoxxx (talk) 12:57, September 16, 2014 (UTC)