Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-27797856-20160506214346/@comment-27797856-20160508085939

Sarutobii2 wrote: C) I did provided some JPN sources for the 50th time. Also not a rule, if it was, some of those articles would have been deleted along with every unnamed technique on the wiki. But since it's an imaginary rule, they didn't and you resorted to the next best thing and redirecting everything.

D) As relevant in a technique name discussion as Naruto becoming Hokage as a kid in some game. While we're at it lets discredit anything from the anime for making up colour schemes, names and fillers. Ok, and non of the names "you provided" are of creatures that were water-resistant. Plus, for the billionth time, all of those creatures we called "Chojū Giga" in the anime/manga.

As I've mentioned, english translations can be sloppy. The names can be the same in Japanese, but differ in translations. Can't you get it through your head, I've said that like 3 times now... Hence - Give us a legit Japanese source.

Since when are we cherry-picking information we do and do not like? We have it - we use it. You're seriously trying to convey us to pick information that you like and drop the rest... O.o