Talk:Giant Insect Fang: Sixty-Four Palms

Edits
Why do you have to modify what I write? I'm putting in correct informations, so what's the problem? Kiba is joined only by Hinata during the spinning part of the technique, and you can clearly see it in the video.
 * Sign your edits with the four tildes (~). Your edit was unnecessary as Omni said. Munchvtec (talk) 16:35, March 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * It was not unnecessary. This is supposed to give right informations, so if Omni writes that "Kiba is joined by both Hinata and Shino" that's not a correct informations. Marino89 (talk) 16:37, March 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * uh huh...tell me more. Munchvtec (talk) 16:38, March 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure, I can tell you all that you want, and as I want, since this is a FREE community. Marino89 (talk) 16:40, March 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * If you want to specify she activates her Byakugan then do so but that should be enough. Munchvtec (talk) 16:41, March 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, c'mon man, what's the big deal if I write a few more things? I mean, nobody is gonna die if there are 6 lines instead of 5. Marino89 (talk) 16:43, March 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * Can an admin either lock the page or block this user since an edit war will go on forever :/ So irritating. Munchvtec (talk) 16:45, March 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * @Marino89: Instead of revert warring, which violates our Revert policy, you could explain why you think your information is correct. Instead of being snarky and rude to other editors on a talkpage.
 * Seems this isn't the first time you've had to be told about this kind of edit on the wiki. --SuperSajuuk (talk) 17:42, March 15, 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't think I've been rude. Besides, the others users removed my mods, so why are you labelling me as the only one who violated the policy? My only interest, as a fan is to add correct informations about Naruto's series. But in here seems to be too many persons who feel the right to correct everything that is not wrote by them. Marino89 (talk) 12:02, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * We removed what was unnecessary. If you fealt you were wrongly accused of something, bring it to a sysops/admins attention. Oh...wait. an admin reverted your edit as well. Anyways, this discussion is over seeing as though this convo won't assist the article in any way shape or form. Munchvtec (talk) 13:59, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Look who is rude and snarky. Anyways, I don't care about what you said. Bye. Marino89 (talk) 14:17, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Check the signatures on messages; i never called you rude nor snarky. None of us violated a rule besides you. Bye. Have a good day man Munchvtec (talk) 14:24, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * @SuperSajuuk: May I know why you removed my mod? It was correct. Marino89 (talk) 14:22, March 21, 2016 (UTC)