Talk:Naruto (series)

Page
Yay! We needed this. I'm not going to touch. Although, it is tempting.
 * -LoneWolf 5

This is a total rip off of the wikipedia page we should try to be original -Random123


 * An encyclopedia dosen't write original research. It finds sources of information and cites them as information. Both Wikipedia and Narutopedia are licensed under the GFDL. The best way to make this a good encyclopedia is to first copy over already existing information from wikipedia, format it so it fits into the wiki, then expand on that information with more information than wikipedia has. A good quote to remember, don't reinvent the wheel unless it needs reinventing. We're not taking credit for work, we're using it as a base, that's why the is there. Dantman (Talk) 00:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Source material, shouldn't be wikipedia it should be the manga, the anime or something i guess like that it's okay to write it BASED on wikipedia but it shouldn't be the same exact page as on wikipedia-Random123


 * Actually, I take the stuff from wikipedia and change it so that it fits our standers. I do it all the time on the jutsu page. I think thats what we all really do. Except for the annoying people who don't change it.-LoneWolf 5

I honeslty think this page needs to be renamed "Naruto (franchise)". ~Kakashi Namikaze (talk) 19:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I found that someone had changed Sasuke's name to sasgay and fixed it but there may be more errors on the page--PAIN 15:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC) PAIN

What is this?
What is with the last sentence in the first paragraphhere... i do not understand what '$1, $1' means... besides being a variable maybe from before. Simant (talk) 03:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Spoiler
This has nuttin to do wid this but can we create a spoiler page for spoiler like the Bleach wiki? 70.119.223.231 (talk) 13:30, December 8, 2009 (UTC)


 * Do you mean a page where possible translations of new chapters are listed? If so, how would that be beneficial? ~SnapperTo 18:04, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

Kishi & Anime
Is Kishi involved with the anime- does he approve plotlines like Echiiro Oda from One Piece or is the anime independent of him?
 * Given the information we have, it seems Kishimoto-sensei is not involved in any way with any part of the series other than the manga and data/fan books. —ShounenSuki (talk 23:24, October 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * What information would that be? I don't doubt your word, but I'm researching for a friend.


 * Interviews, columns, and evidence from the manga and anime. Nothing Kishimoto-sensei ever did or said tells us he has anything to do with the anime, but there are dozens of direct and indirect references to him not having anything to do with it.
 * For example, Kishimoto-sensei has complained about several things that happened in the anime and movies, like the use of guns and trains. There have been numerous big mistakes, like Itachi's Sharingan when he was first shown using Tsukuyomi, that would never have happened had Kishimoto-sensei been involved with the anime. Several anime-only arcs, like the Curry of Life arc, go directly against some of the themes Kishimoto-sensei has used in the manga. There are many more, but this is all I can think of right now.
 * —ShounenSuki (talk 13:03, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

i think we need narutopedia although masashi should a own it and add to it about all the naruto stuff imean reall hes alread wrote chapter 521 and its still on going

deface
Someone has changed the entire article to just 'This series is gay. BELIVE IT!' ignoring the fact that they had to watch it for ages to write that, could we get it changed back?
 * The edit you're talking about was reverted only 2 minutes later, meaning the page is back to normal. —Fmakck (Images 16:45, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

MUSIC
Hi, I have a request. I am looking for music from Naruto.  in the beginning of video i amazing music. What title is it? Thanks. Sorry for my terrible english

Naruto's Jutsu list
Great page about Naruto and it is updated all the time which is splendid! However when you look at Naruto's Jutsu list, some of those are misleading and shouldn't really be there, because a lot of those were only "one time" moves that isn't or cannot be done again. So shouldn't only the regular jutsu's be on the list?

Typhoon Water Vortex Technique: (this one is misleading because Naruto won't be doing this again and it was a one time thing, if people see this that don't really know Naruto they will think, it's one of his moves)

Wind Release: Rasengan (Only the Rasen Shuriken is his technique, this technique was the incomplete Rasen Shuriken and not really his Jutsu)

All the Combo's he has with Shadow clones should be all put into one or just under the multi shadow clone technique.

One thousand years of pain and the pachinko tech shouldn't really be on the list because they not really jutsu's either.

So what do you think? Should they be on or off?


 * I'm sorry. But unless you're Masashi Kishimoto, none of us get to decide what Naruto can or cannot do (again) The One Thousand Years of Death was given a rank in a databook and has listed users— that pretty much makes it a technique no matter how useless it is. Though I do remember it being applied in real-life battle against Gaara.--Cerez365™Hyūga Symbol.svg 13:28, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Besides, we document the series as it is as a whole, not just as the current chapters say it is. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:17, February 10, 2012 (UTC)