Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-36512555-20200202084241/@comment-26636534-20200215135124

FlatZone wrote: I never said that about YM, one thing I will not do is give somebody something they cannot do and don't have, and I damn sure won't sit back and watch people trash a certain character just because they don't like the character. Also just because he accelerated the flames doesn't mean they would stay accelerated, he would have to actively do that to keep them like that, so then when he leaves they go back to burning at their normal rate, that makes far more sense logically. I'll hold you to your statements, I wonder what I'll find if I quote past threads lol. So you won't give anybody anything they don't have yet: You just assumed Itachi accelerated the flames. Another contradiction?

So according to you, Itachi "accelerated" Amaterasu to "burn" quickly through the wall. But what about the lone flame? The lone flame should have then also "accelerated" "burning" through the wall. It's still there meaning it didn't "burn" through the wall. Meaning no "acceleration" in the first place.

@Squinty's breakdown made more logical sense as it incorporates the lone flame.