Board Thread:Boruto: Naruto the Movie/@comment-17623-20150809155020/@comment-24949460-20150815123025

Bob1200 wrote: GoldLiger wrote: JOA20 wrote: GoldLiger wrote: JOA20 wrote: GoldLiger wrote: And you missed the point. Which is why when Sarada asked Orochimaru about creating regular humans instead of straight up clones Orochimaru said it was too easy. Orochimaru didn't create a straight up clone but a son. Get it now? And you misread that part. Sarada didn't ask Oro about "creating" humans, but about verifying blood relationships. You answer that too fast dude lol. Try verifying first. 6 minutes are more than enough to check a couple of manga pages. But dude you have to ask yourself. If cloning is possible in the Naruto world(thanks to Orochimaru) what about creating life in general? If all you need to clone someone is by using nerves and teeth then what about genetically creating a child outside the normal process?

That is why that chapter only confirms that Mitsuki is a literal test tube baby.

Which is why the chapter 10 "explanation" makes no sense because it left out key details that would have proven the facts about the words being said in that chapter. Mitsuki Could Also Be Adopted Tho. Yellow eyes and pale skin. Definite not adopted. It was confirmed that he is Orochimaru's child.

I hope someone does an interview with Kishimoto about the whole waste of time that was the Gaiden. Chapter 9 and 10's dialogue made absolutely no sense for the theme that was "Nature vs Nurture". I want to know what the ORIGINAL INTENT for the Gaiden was from Kishimoto's own words. What HE wanted to happen prior to whatever caused the shift in dialogue in chapter 9 and 10.