Board Thread:Naruto Discussions/@comment-1514283-20140829001753/@comment-1514283-20140830034803

I hope no one takes my posts as endorsements of careless editing by which unsupported claims and hypothesis are posted and then rectified with a "oops, silly me!" That is the last thing I want.

I am strictly referring to the obvious and credible, things that are in front of us but left without further explanation or confirmation provided by Kishimoto - which I feel I have to keep reminding people has become an increasing rarity due to the frequency with which Kishimoto has introduced new concepts over the past five years.

So to clarify, I'm not proposing contributors to be allowed to edit as they see fit. I suggest they are allowed to do so only when they sufficiently back up their suppositions with sound logic concrete evidence, and have their proposal be accepted by consensus i.e. that is to say: with the majority of responders agreeing to the proposed changes.

I realise the way we do things on this wiki will never be perfect, but at least this way we can have some consistency if changes made by logic and evidence are the norm, rather changes being subject to a wheel of (mis)fortune range of scrutiny and standards.

If we can have this one universal standard at least, then I feel this place would be far less frustrating for everyone involved.