Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-2140588-20150318152949/@comment-945885-20150404221421

The anime filler is canon to the anime, but the anime isn't necessarily canon to the manga. It's an adaptation, which makes it a derivative work.

The movies (with the exception of The Last and Boruto) are easy to classify as completely non-canon, as they're oneshot stories that don't actually fit into the series timeline, often directly contradicting it.

As far as the novels go, we've yet to get clear word on whether Kishimoto considers them part of the official manga timeline, though Shueisha at least seems to be treating them as such. I'm of the opinion that they're canon to the manga timeline, but barring official confirmation there's an argument to be made for them being considered a seperate, expanded canon.

As far as the articles go, I've always been in favor of being inclusive, not exclusive. That means including the filler arcs and novels. So long as the source of the information is noted in a readily apparant way, there's no need to worry about people being confused. Whether that be through templates or statements, I don't particularily care.