Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20150527125159/@comment-1251315-20150527151443

Djfghdfe53475zdhdf wrote: I guess the issue is that Shak's edits are legit. It's like (theoretically spoken) adding Trivia notes about the Japanese pronunciation of names (let's just pretend that would be a legit trivia note), but because there's no mention of the English pronunciation, it all gets taken down, even though the trivia in itself was correct. That's wrong in my eyes! That isn't the issue. Any edit could be considered legitimate, but by making a contribution to the wiki, you give freedom to any editor to go and remove it at any time, without warning or without a reason. That is how wiki's work. If an editor doesn't want their contributions removed, they shouldn't add them to a page. Otherwise, vandalism wouldn't be instantly reverted, since someone could reliably suggest the edit is legitimate.