Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-27233105-20160130092635/@comment-27233105-20160203124826

Minato 87 wrote: I understand that, but Izanagi users aren't inherently "bad" simply because of their use of the genjutsu. I'll save the morals argument for another thread though. Rachin123 wrote: Is it Tsukuyomi that lasts 72 hours or was it Itachi's Tsukuyomi? Thanks for this, it should help clear up things. Any amount of distortion from Tsukuyomi is likely decided by the caster. MlGshinobi wrote: You're basically arguing that it's impossible to break the genjutsu at all. Most would disagree, including Itachi--in his own words "every jutsu has a weakness". It's very possible there is at least one person who could break his version of Tsukuyomi. Its duration going unbroken in real time is one second. If it's broken (resolved), then logically less than one second has gone by. I understand your argument though, the brain wouldn't seem to operate that quickly in real time. However, the victims actually gain some advantage in such an experience. The victim perceives it as real time, so some part of the brain has to be adjusted to operate that quickly i.e. those brain processes (dealing with perception of time) will be sped up (exercised) during Tsukuyomi. Even with all the discussion of this particular jutsu's efficacy, I don't think even Minato can break this version. I also don't think he'd get caught in it either. Kakashi only did by taking a risk. Most of all, sorry if I caused any confusion about the OP. I meant to have this battle be somewhat consequential with the events in the story. I added Oro and Kabuto to the OP.