Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-27797856-20160506214346/@comment-27797856-20160506225111

Omnibender wrote: Many of the articles you redirected existed perfectly fine as game only jutsu, which were then changed into manga and anime jutsu as well, and that's what bothered you. I did what was done with articles like "True Wind Release: Rasenshuriken"; the article was mentioned in the trivia, but in my case, I mentioned the name in the gallery. The names still exist, maybe they're a little more difficult to locate now, but they're still there...

Omnibender wrote: For me, if something gets a name in a game, it should be considered for an article. For me, the greater issue at hand is when something in the game should be considered to have happened in the manga and anime as well. As I've mentioned before, when there's literally no difference between a technique and its predecessor, what's the point of even having a page for it? Eg. Just to point out that the animal is a "lion"?

Omnibender wrote: If the something from the game matches something from the manga/anime, then it should discussed if it gets added to a list or gallery, like you did with combos from Sai and Deidara, or if it remains its own article. Actually, it's more like: It should be discussed whether the technique should be made into an anime/manga technique beforehand, even more so if it adds nothing new to the article... And I think it's something we should implement as an official rule (or something) now...