Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-3279282-20150305160501/@comment-1251315-20150305172042

Seelentau wrote: Sajuuk, as I said, this discussion isn't about what gets a place and what does not. So you're missing the point. Also, calling discussions stupid isn't helping at all. If you have nothing to contributed aside from contradicting yourself, you might as well just don't participate in the discussion. You missed the point I was trying to make. I do not care if a technique is unnamed or not. I do not care if an article exists for an ability. They all get a place here, because this is a Naruto Wiki. We don't get to pick and choose what articles get a place here: what if someone came here looking for specific information about Heal Bite, for example?

They should not be forced to search through Karin's article to find a single line saying "she can allow allies to bite her to heal themselves", they should be able to find it clearly on a separate article, especially as in the case of Heal Bite, it's clearly notable and Karin has used it repeatedly in the past. Un-named or not, it gets a place on the wiki.

If we're going to delete pages like Heal Bite on the basis of "it's an unnamed technique", then why don't we just remove anything that was never named in a databook? That's surely going to please people. /sarcasm