User talk:Simant

Re: Team Infobox
If you can do it in a way that doesn't cause existing queries to become a complex mess (or at least not any messier). Otherwise it's better to use another property. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Feb 12, 2010 @ 08:05 (UTC)


 * I was wondering, is it possible to somehow make a distinction between ad hoc, single-mission teams like the Sasuke Retrieval Team and more established teams like the genin teams? --ShounenSuki (talk 17:40, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I was thinking of a separate property row called team type, or something. --ShounenSuki (talk 18:18, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's a bit of a problem, actually. the team status property shouldn't be there. It's the same as using current or former, which we've been trying to get rid off as well. --ShounenSuki (talk 21:59, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * It might be a bit superfluous in terms of information, but I would personally like to be able to sort the teams on team type. --ShounenSuki (talk 22:13, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I haven't really thought about the exact terms yet. It will really depend on what exactly is considered a team, as opposed to a partnership or an organisation.
 * I could see values for genin team (e.g. Team Kakashi) and ad hoc teams (e.g. the Sasuke Retrieval Team), perhaps criminal gangs (e.g. the Magaki group) and specialised teams (e.g. Twelve Guardian Ninja and the various teams of the Nijū Shōtai). --ShounenSuki (talk 22:20, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

2 Things

 * 1) Might want to think about another archive. This is starting to get long.
 * 2) Color for the infoboxes. /shrug think they are stable enough to handle it? I dunno they are all grey and it seems kinda boring >.>. Like Green for Konoha, Beige for Suna, Purple for Oto, ect, ect.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 17:40, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I would say they people like him would have the color of their most recent affiliation. For example, Orochimaru would be purple, for Sound, while Sasuke would be...well...I think he would be gray for straight missing-nin...All members of Akatsuki would have Red...ect...ect...--TheUltimate3 (talk) 01:56, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I think it would be more logical to use their main affiliation; the village of which they have the symbol in their databook profile. Otogakure for Orochimaru, Konohagakure for Madara and Sasuke, Kirigakure for Suigetsu, etcetera. --ShounenSuki (talk 13:46, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * That make sense...But for some reason seeing Sasuke's affiliation be green for Konoha just seems...stupid. For some reason I have less of an issue with Madara's (though I still would like some sort of red or red/black for Akatsuki) being green...--TheUltimate3 (talk) 14:07, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * Affiliation is really that village that a character is most put into connection with. Sasuke is still thought off as a Konoha-nin, just like Madara is. I wouldn't find it odd at all to see him with a Konoha infobox. --ShounenSuki (talk 18:24, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * @Simant Understood. Don't worry about it if it's a problem. I'll figure something out once everything is stable and what not.
 * @ShounenSuki: It's more or less my strong anti-Sasuke sentiment. The fact that I can see the series true villain with the Konoha symbol, but not Sasuke is really because I see him as an asshat. >.>--TheUltimate3 (talk) 18:35, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Episode - video links
Screw Crunchyroll >.> (Horribly biased. Used to be a user of Crunchyroll before they dumped all the anime and made ya have to pay.) All the episodes (official translations mind you) should be on Hulu. Though that may also cause problems (I think Dantman said something about it being regional or something) but I do know its free.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 19:30, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Concepts
I'm not sure about that concepts page, the output looks messed up, but it does seam to match up with the defaultsorts. I guess SMW didn't implement that, sorted by defaultsort, but used the first character of page title instead of the first character of defaultsort for the header. As for the job queue, if it looks like something is being skipped for a long period of time the SMWAdmin special page contains a method of forcing the smw's data to be rebuilt. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Jun 8, 2010 @ 04:15 (UTC)
 * It's done using the job queue. Wikia doesn't have the per-page job queue enabled, so you just wait till the script runs them. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Jun 21, 2010 @ 05:39 (UTC) 05:39, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Talkpages
Sorry, but how so? It seems more convenient for everyone than repeating entire arguments. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 02:14, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * You mean when I make an argument and give a redirect to another talk page that has more information on the topic? Thomas Finlayson (talk) 05:10, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I put a link to Jiraiya's talk page in, because a comment I made was related to another ongoing conversation there which could have helped. I think the confusion might be from a spelling error I had origionally, which I noticed and corrected later. Is that what you mean? Thomas Finlayson (talk) 05:04, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Chapters
What, summarizing what happens in the manga chapters in the make? Sure, There might be loads of chapters, but there isn't a lot that happens in a single chapter. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:33, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

What's the problem
come on. That image comes directly from the manga you can check yourself if you dont believe me http://mangastream.com/read/naruto/89152425/9 good luck DevilN (talk) 21:30, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

That why i dont get it. Image policy say that you must use authentic images and i use them and you delete them DevilN (talk) 21:33, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Wow!
A lot of Rasengan variants, but quite honestly, I'm not annoyed at all, nor I should be. I'm fine with a few or a lot of variations of most, if not, all techniques/jutsu, no matter what opinion people may have otherwise. Dekoshu talk contrib 23:50, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Protect
Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:32, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Block
Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:28, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Images
(Sigh) Was it the quality this time? Thomas Finlayson (talk) 07:12, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 22:31, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Episodes
It gives episode-specific info, which is no longer present (appears → debuts). It also gives some props to unnamed characters. I'm neutral on the subject beyond it not being a list. ~SnapperTo 04:16, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Infoboxes
Could I convince you to switch the various infoboxes to listing episode/chapter numbers instead of episode/chapter names? Numbers are easier to eyeball. ~SnapperTo 20:53, June 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * All please. Universally saves needing to click links to see what number the episode or chapter is. ~SnapperTo 21:45, June 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * Episode numbers for the chapter infobox would be cool. Have I told you you're a Prunus persica recently? ~SnapperTo 02:32, June 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Juicy? I thought peaches were bitter? ~SnapperTo 04:28, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

There is something wrong with the Uzumaki clan infobox. It's still listing the Senju Clan Ancestor as a member, even though I removed that from his infobox, and it's not listing Naruto, Kushina and Mito, despite it being in their infoboxes. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 15:03, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

There seems to be a bug with relationship/parents in Infobox:Motoi's father. Motoi is listed twice, even though he's not added to the relationship field in that infobox, and the "manga only" tag appears as a link instead of an annotation. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:07, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

How come?
You are the person that has the most edits so far. How come you don't have sysop or rollback feature? I can't find you there. Sorry if i disturbed you. I am just a little curious.--Ttogafer (talk) 18:13, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

Have the privileges been offered to you? --Ttogafer (talk) 19:13, July 2, 2010 (UTC)