Board Thread:Wiki Discussions and Support/@comment-5407586-20141206094948/@comment-25227224-20141209044821

--- SuperSajuuk wrote: "And we have every right to "pick and choose", you have to consider that the organisational aspects"

I do take it into consideration. If you read what I posted above you would see that I clearly see it as an "undertaking task" with the latter of statements I've since then.

- SuperSajuuk wrote: "There's a limit to just "do what the databook says".

Who gets to make the decision? It's a critical point. I've made a solution of allowing the users to vote on it. Another ignored point. Which people see more fit, apparently. It's a horrible precedent, to discount informing those with wrong information. Just so everyone can abide/allign by your fallacious confirmation bias.

Readers view this wikia as an encyclopedia. Which I can provide plenty of links, of users using it. Because factually; the wikia's information, comes down to organizational and empirical arguments. It's not one or other.

There is nothing black and white about this. This is simply an act of not informing with right information. The author has stated them to be the names, so who are we abridge it?

The names you cherish and "everyone went with" were wrong. And that's all that matters. They were just place-holders. Not some perfect scripture that no one should change.

Merely because we have subjective feelings to traditions. Which i've stated a statement to this before as well.

Ten-tails also makes great arguments in close contrast to mine.

- SuperSajuuk wrote: "As TheUltimate3 made very clear, we have never used the databook arc names as article titles on this wiki"

And so what? It doesn't mean it's right. Appealing to authority doesn't make any more right. I understand the task is quite hard. But like Ten-tails stated :

"Consensus, in this case, doesn't matter. Canon is canon, fan-made terms aren't. The end."

-

SuperSajuuk wrote: " I do not see any good coming out of mass fixing arc titles just to suit the whims of a databook we ignore in terms of arcs".

Dude, I don't like the names either. Then if that's the case, then you might as well stop editing the wiki. It's something I stated since the inception of the conversation, with respect to your position of absurd fallacies.