User talk:Omnibender

Re:Block
Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:26, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:40, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:27, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:19, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:21, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 08:14, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:57, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 08:32, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:40, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:53, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:37, October 6, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:28, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:15, October 8, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:33, October 9, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:45, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:39, October 11, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 08:52, October 12, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:43, October 13, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:47, October 14, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:07, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:01, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:33, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:50, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:48, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:14, October 20, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 15:52, October 21, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:16, October 22, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:30, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:46, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Protect
Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 13:12, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Protected. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 17:47, October 14, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 15:52, October 21, 2010 (UTC)

Can you please stop deleting my edits?
Seriously, I'm trying to make the pages more accurate, but you and Deva 27 keep deleting them. I've reread the fights several times to see if what I was putting down is correct, so why keep deleting? --SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 18:40, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * It was cast by the Mangekyo Sharingan, and Danzo himself said it was Tsukuyomi earlier. And its still far less accurate than what you're trying to keep.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 18:51, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Unnamed
I dislike the idea for the same reasons that I have disliked similar ideas in the past.

We could just block Brazil... ~SnapperTo 23:14, September 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Are we blocking Australia now? ~SnapperTo 23:25, September 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Guess I forgot that. Though, looking at Dantman's block log, that expired in January and wasn't nearly as large as a a city. Plus, this particular spoilsport has occupied, at various times, a "range" of 2,147,483,648 addresses. Narrowing that down from two continents, I end up with 4,194,304 addresses. There's a third option that consists of 256 addresses, but whoever it is has (apparently) moved on from that particular range.
 * I am very disappointed with you. This conversation was supposed to go like this:
 * Me - "We could block Brazil."
 * You - "But I live in Brazil."
 * Me - "If you're trying to sell me on the idea, you're doing a good job of it."
 * Tsk tsk. ~SnapperTo 01:29, September 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * You're going to make me uncheck the "Block anonymous users only" option to get the response I want, aren't you? ~SnapperTo 02:41, September 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * You have crushed my soul.
 * At no point in this conversation have I intended to block anyone. ~SnapperTo 22:58, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Madara and Six Paths
Madara only stated he was the second (Sage) of the Six Paths, and Nagato was the third, correct? So the 6 paths things was just a mistranslation? --GoDai (talk) 00:41, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Left-over stuff from Naruto Shippūden 3: Inheritors of the Will of Fire
Few stuff left from that movie... First of all, we still don't have the pages for the Chimera beasts: Germinating Chimera Snake, Giant Chimera Dog, Fire Breathing Lion-Turtle, Exploding Tag-feathered Bird, and Combined Chimera (yeah I thought of the names on the spot). Secondly, I think we need a page called the Chimera Mark and say the Dark Release was absorbed into it or something. Thirdly, we may need minor pages for the four Kekkei Genkai users, although they are mentioned in the Trivia for Hiruko (missing-nin). We don't have a page on the location Mount Shumisen and I think an "event" article Solar Eclipse might be useful to an extent.

And a question: Was Storm Release revealed in the manga first as the bright-energy-beams thing? Or did the movie have it planned/revealed earlier as the dark-storm-clouds thing? This might tell us whether the movie-only elements will have manga counterparts. --GoDai (talk) 02:41, September 30, 2010 (UTC) Kay I did. So you don't know about the Storm Release thing? --GoDai (talk) 00:12, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Legal
Where can I find/get licensing and fair use rationale (The other wikis don't use this...-_-) 00:40, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, Omnibender I have a simple wiki question for you. Main reason I came to you, is you seem knowledgeable (brown nosing ftw). But in seriousness, do you know if there is a way for someone else to take control of an inactive wiki. A series I like already has a wiki, but the creator hasn't edited in a while. If you can help, I would appreciate and if you are totally unsure- any idea's on where I could find this info or maybe a solution?--I am the Fallen Death Sentence 00:31, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Cool, tyvm for the information. Hopefully the original creator will respond, and at least give me ownership or even some kind of adminship--I am the Fallen Death Sentence 01:14, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Naruto's move on kisame befor escaping
Hello i am >User Talk:NarutoUzumaki523 and i'd like to know why add blinding speed if it is known that he used teleportation jutsu (Body Flicker) and saying his blinding speed is like saying he moved and ect but killer bee said him self "Body flicker (or in other translation teleportation) and a right hand smash, but all i saw was a yellow flash!" so i am woundering why not put body flicker? (talk)

Stuff
Omnibender you must take a look at the kanji for Transparent Escape Technique LOL. It makes it sound like a Release... although Jiraiya does claim he invented it... Just for fun. The "~ton" part of that jutsu usually means "escape" nowadays more than "element", so it's understandable I guess.

And so we have no idea which one of movie and manga was first for coming up with the name "Storm Release" right?

Re: Wow
You mean to tell me you've never seen 500 articles of spam created in an hour in a language that at least 90% of the wiki's readers cannot understand?

You'll forgive me if I find that hard to believe.

On the bright side, we now know what time of the day the Volunteer Spam Task Force is not available. ~SnapperTo 02:48, October 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * We seem to have a recurring issue with sarcasm. ~SnapperTo 02:36, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

Bold Heading
Excuse me for the intrusion, but may I have a word with you? This really has been bugging me since I first came here, but I always kinda shy to bring it up. I looked through most of the jutsus' pages here on the Narutopedia, and I've noticed that only a minimum about of it has bold heading, like the Rasengan for example. I was wondering, with a high-ranking user's permission, if it'd be all right if I had do the same to the other jutsus' pages.-- Ninja Sheik  19:10, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

I see, but aren't most wiki articles have bold headings on their articles? Besides, it makes the page look better. I don't see the problem with it, do you? Will be okay for me to do it, please?-- Ninja Sheik  19:57, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

So, it that a "no"?-- Ninja Sheik  20:03, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, okay. I understand...I think. Thanks, Mister Omnibender. Oh, and next time we talk, can we stay on one talk page? I really hate going back and forth to our talkpages when we could just reply to each other one page.-- Ninja Sheik  20:12, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Debut II
Yah, I was optimizing the code yesterday, so that there weren't * when there was a single entry. It was causing extra space to be used which was ugly... well it should be fixed now, thanks. S im A nt 21:34, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Classification
Setting allowed values for properties is my way of attempting to idiot proof the semantic values. Don't know why "?" still appears in special:browsedata/characters ... S im A nt 21:41, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Before you poke me about it, for Special:BrowseData/Characters, classification will be down until pages update. I didn't like the property being subject to redirects, when it had fixed values in it. S im A nt 20:58, October 20, 2010 (UTC)

Nativty of 1,000 trees as a kekkei genkei? ( Hashirama Jutsu)
i was thinking about this last night as i slept:

should Hashirama's Birth of dense woodland be technically classified as a Kekkei genkai? the word Kekkei Genkai is defined in the world of Naruto as " a technique limited to inheritance by blood". from this description it point to the fact that everyone one that is a descendant or closely relative of hashirama would be able to use mokuton jutsu ( basing it off of the fact that in the world of Naruto, blood line limits seem to be dominant gene's, giving everyone whom is born into that family that ability [ think about it, have you ever seen a hyuuga, aburame, yamanaka, or nara member that does not have the ability to utilize their special jutsu?]). this would mean that Tsunade and Tobirama could have ( and effectively would have) used the Wood jutsu in their time of battle. also, if it was infact a bloodline limit, it wouldn't be classified as so on yamato's profile simply because he isnt a part of hashirama's bloodline. [ this actually adds credibility to the fact that it isn't a bloodline. its more closely related to a high level, unlearn-able kinjutsu]. Hashirama nor anyone else has stated that this is a bloodline, they usually say its a "special technique" ( to my knowledge, i dont think anyone has stated that this is a bloodline technique). i feel that the classification of this technique should be changed from bloodline to High level Kinjutsu.

--Iowndisciti (talk) 20:05, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Is there nothing we can do about Wiki contributers?
I understand that this is a place where people can learn about Naruto without fan-fiction and no one with the intentions of learning should be blocked, but it's getting quite annoying where they start to edit stuff to meet their own "standards". Is there nothing that can be done? --GoDai (talk) 05:12, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Well not sure about the Russian vandalism, but I'm seeing more "Wikia contributers" and some users adding false or inaccurate info to completely fine pages. It happens a lot when no one right in their mind is on the site... and the edits stay until discovered. And I swear I didn't see so many Wikia contributers at once.--GoDai (talk) 01:52, October 20, 2010 (UTC)

Arc Numbers
Then that doesn't really make sense, since the title Shippuuden is only relevant to the anime...

Oh, I see what you mean. I wasn't aware there was a specific article for the different arcs, I was just using the Property Value page. Thanks for the info. 99.230.209.13 (talk) 20:25, October 20, 2010 (UTC)

Is Ohana ever wrong?
When I'm searching for raws... I usually see Ohana's posts of the Chapters. Are these accurate? --GoDai (talk) 04:30, October 21, 2010 (UTC)

Oh I see. And so this is brought up: Is there really a Bakuton, an element of expolsion? I doubt it, but do we not have raws? I'm pretty sure he meant something like Bakudan, as in bomb. Also, something suggests the difference between 溶 and 熔. Although both can be used for "Lava", the former seems to be related to Kiri and the latter Iwa. Do we leave it for now? --GoDai (talk) 21:15, October 21, 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm, Rōshi was first, and his was referred to as 熔遁, but the word lava itself was 溶岩. Mei was next, and hers was 溶遁, but it wasn't quite specified what she was really using (Hopefully the anime creators will ask Kishimoto before they decide whether it's lava or some globs of corrosives.), and this time, Kurotsuchi uses quicklime (Is that really 石灰?), and once again Kishimoto switches to 熔遁. Isn't he implying the two are different somehow? --GoDai (talk) 21:34, October 21, 2010 (UTC)

I understand. I just hope I don't have to resort to changing my theory to say <"Earth+Water" and "Water+Earth"> are different, although some could just turn out to be Yin/Yang combinations. --GoDai (talk) 21:48, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you don't mind me butting in, I have a thing to say about the Lava Release issue. At first glance, it would certainly seem as if the Iwa Yōton uses 熔, whereas the Kiri Yōton uses 溶. However, Rōshi's Yōton has been written with both kanji, which is why I consider both spellings to refer to the same technique. If Kishimoto-sensei had wanted to make this difference between Iwa and Kiri Yōton, I would think he'd be a bit more consistent. —ShounenSuki (talk 22:34, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Almost forgot to answer your question, Omnibender >< To be honest, I really can't tell right now. With Kurotsuchi's technique, I'd like to wait for an actual raw bwfore passing judgement, but with Yamato's technique, it could easily go either way. Really, it is kind of the same problem as with the Lava Releases and even with Temari's Great Sickle Weasel Technique and Scythe Weasel. —ShounenSuki (talk 22:38, October 21, 2010 (UTC)

Minor Articles
I'm looking to address this to the person running the Wiki, or lacking that, it's most senior member. If that isn't you, I would appreciate being directed to them. Anyway. There's a lot of smaller articles referring to games, filler, minor characters and the like. So I was wondering if I could get permission to go around expanding them to the best of my ability. I have no intention of giving false information or anything, but these more minor articles often ask if you can improve them anyway. On that note, if any of those articles come up in future you could always drop me a message. -Hawkeye2701