Template talk:Infobox/Jutsu

Are you sure this is well...done?
Because I see the change in the Rasengan page and well...i'm gonna be blunt. Its awful at the moment. It just seems...so out of place. It weems teh pictures don't work, u can't link the users names in the infobox without it breaking (I tried in preview) it just seems...so unfinished.--TheUltimate3 04:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ya, it's some live experimentation. It's not finished yet. I'm waiting for a few caches to expire. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 29, 2009 @ 04:44 (UTC)
 * Images are due to | images = being used instead of | image name =, because of form use I've gotten rid of a lot of old unnecessary parameters. Name linking will be automatic. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 29, 2009 @ 04:53 (UTC)
 * Well if we are testing, wouldn't it be...well better to test in a User page or something. Cause I mean...it just looks so weird.
 * And on a completely unrelated note, is there even a slauight possibility of making the infoboxes well....unique. Take at look at teh Star Wars Wiki, Avatar Wiki, Kingdom Hearts, ect they have unique and interesting infoboxes. Is there a way to give our infoboxes character like that. /shrug giving someone pleasing to look at, even if it's just a infobox will go a long way.--TheUltimate3 05:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I had some example testing... I guess I just can't get to far without doing something live.
 * It looks like I'm going to have some issues with pages like Wind Release: Rasenshuriken. I don't know how I'm going to deal with things like separated jutsu completion info. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 29, 2009 @ 05:52 (UTC)

Canon
Assuming how to tackle anime-only/game-only users is still a problem, would it be simpler to have separate parameters? Like,  , and. They would all be listed together in the infobox, but different things would be done with them; the contents of  would automatically have (anime only) added after them and they'd somehow be magically excluded from non-anime filters. ~SnapperTo 22:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Shippūden
Why is it suddenly Shippuden and not Shippūden? --ShounenSuki (talk 06:54, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
 * Cause I finally got around to realizing that Shippuden has been out under the English title Shippuden for awhile and is no longer Japanese romaji we're using. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Oct 5, 2009 @ 18:03 (UTC)
 * Oh, that's a shame. I was noticing a slight trend towards relying on the Japanese as a primary source and English as a secondary at most. I guess it was false hope... --ShounenSuki (talk 19:01, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Refernces
References, can we just seperate them with a semicolon, and add them without the tags; letting the infobox take care of it? Simant (talk) 18:39, October 5, 2009 (UTC)