Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-25075055-20140331114355/@comment-6794268-20140406214547

I can see why you'd think that, but I don't think (can be wrong) I am? I am looking at two different things. I am looking at Narutopedia, the information and site itself. There is no inherent community in it because it's just information. The community part comes into play when the people interact and talk about that information, whether how to best phrase it, what's right or wrong, etc. Which, I can see why you'd make the neighbour analogy. The information would be you live next to eachother, and the interaction would be asking for sugar. But it's not so much semantics because, again, Narutopedia isn't a community. Narutopedia is information regarding Naruto. But there is a community of Narutopedia at a lower level who work on that information. It's equivalent to saying science is a community, when science is just information and understanding. But it's not a community, though there is a scientific community who work on that information. Still, I guess you could make a case for semantics, but I'd fervently disagree.