User talk:Bob1200

Welcome
Hello, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Kaguya Ōtsutsuki page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.


 * Here are several other pages that can help you with where to begin-


 * Wiki Activity – A great first stop, because you can see what pages other people have been editing, and where you can help out.


 * Help Pages - If you're new to editing or having trouble getting something to work, the help pages are a great place to start.


 * Forums - The forums are used for a number of things, from proposing policy changes to general wiki discussions. Please use Naruto Answers for asking general questions.


 * Administrators - A list of 's administrators. If you need additional assistance or are having troubles, feel free to contact an administrator with the details.


 * Special:Upload - A page that provides you a form for uploading images easily.

Always sign in before you edit – This is so that we can recognize you!

Always sign your posts - When leaving a message on someone's talk page, remember to sign it by clicking either the 'signature' button or by typing four tildes ( ). This is so the person knows who to reply to.

There's a lot to do around here, so we hope you'll stay with us and make many more contributions. And again, welcome to. Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Ten Tailed Fox (talk) 00:16, July 25, 2014 (UTC)

re: reference
It's not how we add references, also it's not considered to be a legitimate source of information. You should bring up the issue on the article's talkpage. --Sajuuk Special:Contributions/SuperSajuuk 14:13, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * Any website can just be resharing another website. You need to provide the more legitimate source (such as Saiyan Island).
 * Also, Please Stop Talking Like This, It's Quite Annoying. --Sajuuk Special:Contributions/SuperSajuuk 14:28, June 26, 2015 (UTC)

Manual of Style.
"Manual of Style"

- Do not make edits that do absolutely nothing to change the appearance of the page when it is rendered, such as adding or removing a space between paragraphs, adding underscores in spaces when including an image onto an article, or removing unused parameters from infobox templates. This does nothing except add pointless edit revisions to the page history and does not improve the wiki.

Please do not do edits like these. They do not improve the wiki, and adds needless revisions to the recent changes feed. Another user has had issues in the past by doing so, so please leave the parameters as they are. The comma does nothing, and would reappear there regardless. 02:50, August 9, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Storm 4
You know, I don't think that's a bad idea but those fights are never shown in the trailers, only the major boss battles. In addition, even if they were to get confirmed you'd have a hard time trying to convince most people to actually add them. Imagine how long the page would be lol.--Mina talk  00:14, August 10, 2015 (UTC)

All that screenshot shows is a in-game menu page. Unlike the screenshots clearly showing QTE between Sasuke and Hashirama, that doesn't confirm a battle at all. In an unrelated note, please user proper capitalisation, using upper case letters for the first letter in every word is fugly. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:23, August 16, 2015 (UTC)
 * Hinting at something ≠ confirmation of something. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 17:07, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

Forum
Just a heads-up; you don't have to capitalize every single word when you type something in the forums. It's a little distracting from what you're trying to say and it kinda hurts people's eyes. --Jizo 根 (talk) 20:12, August 16, 2015 (UTC)
 * Seriously, stop doing that. Adhere to the grammar rules everyone follows. • Seelentau 愛 議 11:49, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you never go to school? Here. • Seelentau 愛 議 13:23, August 17, 2015 (UTC)

re: Storm 4
You may "lol" all you want, but I, along with other users, don't find it to be funny. Because as long as this wiki existed, before you came around, we add 100% confirmed info to video game articles. Not "semi-confirmed", not "partially-confirmed", nope. Otherwise, users get blocked. And also, stop edit warring. Seriously. Use. The. Talkpage. You edit war like no one's business for crying out loud. Two articles have been protected due to your constant edit warring. It's disruptive. If you continue to do so, there will be consequences (and that's no threat, that's a promise). 22:23, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

Storm 4
That's the trap you're falling into. Semi-confirmed? Possible? We add facts to articles, not what ifs. Wait until it's confirmed, and then you can laugh all you want at us; but not before.--JOA2022:23, August 16, 2015 (UTC)
 * ^I got it, JOA :) 22:24, August 16, 2015 (UTC)
 * Please do, After And If It Turns Out To Be A Boss Battle. Have a nice day.--JOA2022:38, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

re: question
If you don't see blocking as discipline, that's your opinion. Blocking users restricts them from editing anything, and all a blocked user could do is just read the site, but not edit on it. And not really. Blocking a rather disruptive user is never a punishment for the editors of the wiki. 23:11, August 16, 2015 (UTC)
 * Cool 23:21, August 16, 2015 (UTC)
 * The wiki's existed for 8 years. 23:29, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

Section removal
Do not remove things from your talk page. Read the rules please. • Seelentau 愛 議 12:24, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * You're not the target of anything. It's just that if you write like shit, you're gonna get shit for it. There are basic grammar rules you have to adhere to and if you don't like that, feel free to leave. You can read the rules here. Also, read everything linked in the yellow box. Otherwise, there'll be consequences you'll have to face if you continue like that in the future. • Seelentau 愛 議 12:52, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * It has nothing to do with tolerance. Writing like that makes your messages harder to read and I can promise you that no one will want to have anything to do with you because of that. Because it just sucks reading what you write. Furthermore, it shows that you don't care about basic grammar rules, so it's less likely that you'll become a trusted member of the community. After all, who can say for sure that you won't write like that in the articles? It's really nonsense to write like that in a written encyclopedia, something that absolutely relies on knowledge and following of basic grammar rules. This isn't a fcking chat, you know? • Seelentau 愛 議 12:59, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * I never said that you are a new member. • Seelentau 愛 議 13:14, August 17, 2015 (UTC)

Hey
I Don't Know Why You Have To Talk Like This But It Is Getting Really Annoying. Please stop. You seem to be pissing a lot of users off. Munchvtec (talk) 13:31, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm calling BS here. Ive seen you type normally dude. Munchvtec (talk) 13:50, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Then go back and fix it. Just cause it's a talk page doesn't mean you can go typing anyway you want to. Munchvtec (talk) 13:55, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes because messing up people's talk pages is okay. I'm sure you would not like it if someone did stupid shit to yours though i know you're only going to deny this since i brought it up. Don't message me again please. I don't want your words on my talk page. Unnecessary. Munchvtec (talk) 14:02, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Please, by all means, feel free to report me or whatever. Munchvtec (talk) 14:11, August 17, 2015 (UTC)

Re: ‎JW
If you had read the rules, you'd know why. • Seelentau 愛 議 15:22, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * * sigh*.... If you claim to have been around here for 5-6 years, why don't you know these things, hm? Talkpages are meant to improve the article. You can't just insert anything on them. Theories are for the forums. If it is a discussion that has nothing to do with improving the article (such as theories, which aren't allowed on talkpages but the forums ), it gets removed from the talkpage. There's a notice that tells you this every time you edit an article talkpage.
 * 16:17, August 17, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Hey
"It's just how I type"? Then how can you edit without capitalizing every word? The fact you can write without capitalizing every word and yet choose to is proof you want your posts to stand out, that's the definition of an attention seeker. You can't call others names because they're saying the truth. And don't bother to reply: I'm just going to ignore you from this point onwards, as others already started doing.--JOA2016:07, August 17, 2015 (UTC)

Forum Warning #1

 * Yeah well make the changes before publishing your edits. You cannot just do as it pleases you. It has already caused problems for several users. This is your last warning. Also be sure to read the Userpage policy and other Rules--~Ultimate Supreme  17:05, August 21, 2015 (UTC)


 * I meant in the forums
 * That's a good number and they have valid reasons
 * Because I'm Not Breaking Any Actual Rules
 * If you want to go into technicalities, here are some you are violating mostly from Forum policy:


 * Do not ignore user requests in the forums. If a user or multiple users ask you to stop performing a certain action that makes their experience in the forums uncomfortable, you should stop.
 * Respect the decisions of forum moderators and sysops
 * Leave your ego out of forum threads: don't go around acting high and mighty
 * Do not troll or flame other users. If your message is intended to instigate a reaction from the opposing user, it will be removed and may result in an immediate revocation of your right to post in the forums or edit the wiki.--~Ultimate Supreme  18:30, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

Archived Threads
Is there a reason you've been replying to all these archived/outdated threads recently? We have very specific warnings that say not to reply to a dated thread unless absolutely necessary. I'll chalk this up to a simple mishap for now, but keep doing this and it'll earn you Forum Warning #2. --Jizo 悟 (talk) 06:19, February 24, 2016 (UTC)