Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-25075055-20140502175349

Hi

One of the main issues that I have felt with this wiki is that we only have one bureaucrat. That's been fine for most of the time, but that's becoming a problem for two reasons: In my personal opinion, having an extra bureaucrat to manage certain wiki operations that can only be managed by a crat is a good thing for the wiki, because it means that someone will be there to talk to Wikia on behalf of the community. Sysops can try to get change for the wiki, but they will always require the opinion of one bureaucrat and Dantman is very rarely around to give that opinion.
 * 1) Dantman can't be reached via his talkpage, which means certain things only he can do will go ignored.
 * 2) If you try to email Dantman, you have to get your message correct the first time, because you will only get one chance at a reply: further communication is ignored and a whole new email must be sent to get his attention.

This thread is basically to discuss whether a second bureaucrat is necessary and if so, which person should be promoted to take up the role of a bureaucrat.

Voting won't be happening here, this is just a discussion thread, but you are free to give a vote :)

Thanks. 