Talk:Gamaken

Photo
His current photo makes him look...chunky. I have a better one, here it is> -- WhiteArmor  (Talk)  06:29, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Significantly up the quality on that image and I'd agree. - S im A nt 13:33, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Can't, this is as clear as I can get it. Guess you just have to keep the current one. -- WhiteArmor  (Talk)  02:42, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Naruto
Why is he listed as one of his summoners? Naruto never summoned Gamaken. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:56, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think it is awkward to have summoners in the infobox in the first place, since you sign a contract with a species, not a specific animal. S im A nt 00:40, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

Naruto did summon Gamaken. He summoned him in his fight against Pein.
 * No, Shima summoned the toads and Naruto. Naruto never once did a summon in that fight. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:28, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Well, i think it should be counted as Naruto's summon. That's because it was mentioned Shima will summon Naruto and Fukasuku only (as far i can remember). Also, in the last databook Masashi Kishimoto answered a question about how much toads Naruto can summon (the answer btw was as much he wants). It was related with Pein's attack when we can see Naruto with 5 toads - Gamaken, Gamabunta, Gamakichi, Fukasaku, Gamahiro. That let the impression that Naruto has summoned all the toads except Fukasuku and Shima.

The issue is not whether Naruto can summon them or not, the issue is that he didn't. Naruto didn't offer blood, weaved hand seals, slammed his hand in the ground leading to Gamaken appearing. Shima is the one who summoned them all. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:40, August 7, 2010 (UTC)