User talk:Dantman

Jutsu
When a wiki's owner reverts constructive edits it doesn't say much for the wiki as an informational source. For your convenience, jutsu that fit into one of the following categories have no official ranks (S, A, B) or stats (offensive, supplementary, short range). That means that none should be given. I like to think that wikis strive for accuracy, but it seems that whenever I try to improve accuracy my edits are reverted or somebody else comes along and inserts similar but different falsities. Please consider the possibility that anonymous users know what they're doing. --71.129.250.151 05:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Jutsu that appear only in the anime, like Wind Release: Beast Wave Strike.
 * Jutsu that appear only in movies, like Ice Release: Twin Dragon Blizzard.
 * Jutsu with no real names, like Yamanaka Clan Telepathy.
 * Jutsu that appear after the third data book, like King of Hell.
 * Jutsu that don't appear in any of the data books, like Water Release: Tearing Torrent. The data books are the only source for ranks and stats so this should be a no brainer.
 * That seems fallacious but you are the one paying the bills. Sorry for wasting an hour. --71.129.250.151 06:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * While I'm bothering you, wouldn't it save some time if you set it up so that only users with at least X edits can create/edit user pages? A blanket semi-protection on the user name space? Kind of like how Wikipedia differentiates with some privileges between regular users and autoconfirmed users. That would reduce the number of people who join just to make their own Naruto/Myspace hybrid which means fewer daily deletions for you. --71.129.250.151 06:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Yo
Alright fine, accually i came here from the Naruto Fanon Wiki and an admin and beaurocrat on that site. I came here to help out and i was kinda pissed at "Suicide"?? whihc is just retarded, but i apoligiuze for the attack.

--Seireitou 18:34, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

P.S. Thanks for the welcome!

What's up with this?
Um, Dantman, why are you changing Romanji to Romaji? The information of that subject won't show anymore, why are you doing it? --Rasengan888 23:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * cough*, are you serious!? Don't you realize how much edits you have to do now!? Well, this is really going to take a while for you know that at least over a 100 characters have infoboxes them. Boy, that's going to take a while. Are you going to do that all throughout today? (and yet nobody in this pedia hasn't notice) Maybe you should double-check and recheck the information again. --Rasengan888 00:04, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Hahahahahahaha! Very funny! So, when's this bot thing going to show up? I would really like to see it...also, the jutsu infobox, will you ever be done with it? It's still under construction for many months. If you're not going to use it, you might as well delete it. --Rasengan888 00:13, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


 * ..............I'm pretty speechless of what you just did. Even though I'm 13 years old and amazed easily, I think I'm amazed as a 6 year old. Oh well, thanks for the information!--Rasengan888 00:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

hmm, to tell you the truth, I like the Template:Infobox/Naruto/Episode, it looks better than the my own article for an infobox. I know added more information to the box, but I only want the airdates, and the characters in it, that's it. That's the least thing I want. Oh, and sorry for adding this "extra" information. --Rasengan888 14:11, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Actually strike that, I at least want the airdates, the title (Romaji, and Kanji), and the characters. That's the least. You can add jutsu if you want and the arc is okay too. What about the manga consisting? --Rasengan888 14:19, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I got every information about the infoboxes for the episodes and will wait for the installation. Second off, you still haven't answered my question about the jutsu infobox. --Rasengan888 00:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh, the manga consisting as in what chapter is in the anime. Also, you have another special kind of infobox that's on jutsu. Except, it's been on construction for months, and I was wondering whether if you're ever going to delete it. --Rasengan888 01:00, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

he does make some good points! --AMTNinja 00:18, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Have to be ready
Hey Dantman, since the new episode infobox looks incomplete, I might as well use the original and wait for that new installation to be done. After all, I have a really big article that will consists of three episodes and I'm ready to work on it (as you can see it on my userpage). Reply to this message before 12/29/08, if you can't, then I will use the original infobox for the Naruto episodes since the new really looks incomplete. --Rasengan888 16:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, what I meant by incomplete it's that it looks really messy that there's a lot of added words in it, like: . It looks incomplete because of it. But, I haven't tried it out so wait for a bit...--Rasengan888 00:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

So...do I use the new one or the old one of the episode infobox? --Rasengan888 13:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

...Are you sure? I mean...it's just that...well...um...that it looks really ugly when people starts to read my new article (which is probably going to be a big read), they think that the infobox is like an old-fashioned washing machine and it'll make the article look like that it was eighty years old. I'm really not sure that I should use it though. --Rasengan888 02:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Shouldn't I wait until the Semanatic Forms should come and install, then I could re-edit the article. Also, how do I even put a good input method? --Rasengan888 16:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

...I only have tomorrow to do my article so I'm going to use the "incomplete" new infobox. --Rasengan888 15:39, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * How long is it going to be until the Sematic Forms come in? 'cause I'm getting tired of waiting. Also, I have a real gushy feeling of using the new infobox since the Sematic Forms aren't in yet. RESPOND TODAY! --Rasengan888 15:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Third Databook
I'm not sure where we're getting the databook references, but here is a scanlation of it, as far as I can see, it looks reliable. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:21, 28 December 2008 (UTC)