Narutopedia:Sysop Requests

This page is for users to request the action or attention of one of the Narutopedia's several sysops. If you require a sysop's assistance, please leave a request under one of the following headings and a sysop will get to it as soon as they are able. You may also contact one of the Narutopedia's sysops directly; a list of the wiki's sysops can be viewed here.

Note to sysops: If you have dealt with or intend to deal with an issue, please add to it. Please also archive this page from time to time to ensure the page is kept clean of completed requests.

READ FIRST!
Please check here to see what section your request fits into:
 * Do you feel one of the wiki's pages needs to be protected from editing? Would you like to request that a protected page be unprotected? Is a sysop needed to modify a protected page? If so, please click here to make a protection request
 * Is there a page on the wiki that you believe needs to be deleted? Has something been deleted that you would like to have restored? If so, please click here to make a deletion request
 * Has a user vandalized the wiki? Does somebody continue to make certain kinds of edits after repeated warnings? Would you like a block to be adjusted or removed? If so, please click here to make a block request
 * Is there an issue in the forums that needs a sysop's attention? Is there a forum-related action you would like a sysop to perform? If so, please click here to make a forum request
 * Any other request that doesn't fit one of the above? Please click here to make a miscellaneous request

Protection-related requests

 * Sasuke Uchiha - Protection from moving the page due to vandalism. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 13:54, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. ~SnapperTo 17:53, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sage Art: Super Tailed Beast Rasenshuriken - Counter productive edit warring. Also, pointless edits being made to a comment tag for no reason other than to pad edit count. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 20:30, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Side note: the edit wasn't "padding". ~SnapperTo 20:42, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Naruto Uzumaki's Relationships - Protection from editors who whimsically alter words in the article. Too many pointless edits. WindStar7125  WindStar7125 Task.svg (Talk) (Contributions) 05:13, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Will Materialisation - Counter productive edit warring. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 15:59, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Infobox:Madara Uchiha - To stop a potential edit war over Madara's "deceased" status. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:57, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ ~SnapperTo 20:09, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Un-protect Naruto Shippūden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Revolution since apparently the entire game has been leaked. --Questionaredude (talk) 06:57, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe it would be better to wait until the game is officially released. Another sysop can disagree if they'd like. ~SnapperTo 18:15, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Truth-Seeking Ball - Can protection be removed, seeing as everybody seems to be on the same page about its component natures now.--BeyondRed (talk) 19:15, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * Truth-Seeking Ball - Can protection be removed, seeing as everybody seems to be on the same page about its component natures now.--BeyondRed (talk) 19:15, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Deletion-related requests

 * User:SuperSajuuk/Custom UB, User:SuperSajuuk/Custom UB/Image Uploader and this: Author request. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 15:16, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅--~Ultimate Supreme  17:54, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Wind Release: Great Absorption & Parrot -- Talkpage discussion. Norleon (talk) 17:13, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * These four screen- -shots once this discussion is closed please. Norleon (talk) 12:17, August 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * Koppojutsu - Fanon. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 17:24, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * Snapper's userpage - No offence intended Snapper, but if we tell others off for not following Userpage policy, then it's only right that your userpage be deleted as it has nothing to do with the wiki and doesn't talk about you as an editor. I would use the delete template, but Snapper has had his userpage protected for years. He can save it from deletion by actually making it useful (aka, talking about himself as an editor, like every other editor is required to do to have a userpage) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:30, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * Bumping this deletion request. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 15:39, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * This picture. Unused and unnecessary. The current image we have of Nagato with Madara's Rinnegan is fine. Thanks in advance. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg (Talk) (Contribs) 00:42, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * This picture. Unless used on a profile or talk page, please delete this unnecessary photo. Thanks in advance.-- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 03:34, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:41, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Six Paths Chakra - Talkpage discussion. Norleon (talk) 09:56, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * The following pictures as they are unused or got replaced by png.-versions: File:3rdMizukage.png, File:Madara released.png, File:Hamura hagoromo sealing.png, File:The Seal Begins.JPG, File:Deceased kage summon.jpg, File:Six Paths Chibaku Tensei.JPG. Norleon (talk) 14:23, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * To reiterate the message that appears when you edit this section: "For non-urgent deletions, please simply add to the page you wish to be deleted." ~SnapperTo 18:41, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * This picture. Scanalation image, not allowed here. Thanks in advance. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 01:34, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Asura and Followers.jpg This one as well. --Vecanoi (talk) 01:45, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:50, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Blocking-related requests

 * They have been adding false information on the Naruto Shippūden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Revolution page without sources almost everyday for at least the past month. Examples include adding unconfirmed playable characters, teams, stages, and ultimate jutsu. They have also started adding speculation to the new Naruto Shin Jidai Kaimaku Project page as well. --Questionaredude (talk) 18:10, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. ~SnapperTo 18:37, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Movepage vandalism. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 13:54, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * User only did it once. It's vandalism, I guess, but not worth blocking over if they don't continue. ~SnapperTo 16:52, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Ignoring talkpage warnings to stop violating Image policy (3 warnings given and still violating policy) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 09:26, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. ~SnapperTo 16:52, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Vandalism to Taijutsu. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 17:24, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Spamming "I need to pee" in various threads on the forums. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 20:07, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Vandalism --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 22:08, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:23, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * - violating the Image Policy even after being blocked because of it.--Mangekyō Sharingan Izuna.svg JOA20 09:41, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * The user "Infinite.tsukuyomi" is probably another one of the 5 accounts blocked indefinitely previously for being obsessed with Karin. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 09:43, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * This user keeps uploading images without license and rationale.--Mangekyō Sharingan Izuna.svg JOA20 09:38, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ ~SnapperTo 16:46, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:58, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Disputed page protected instead. ~SnapperTo 20:11, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * You might now want to consider a block, based on this repeatedly undone edit --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 20:36, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * has been insulting other members for disagreeing with him, treating everyone like they are below him, and even if the manga says he's wrong he doesn't admit it, so potentially vandalizing articles will become an issue. He has been warned for his rudeness before and hasn't taken it to heart.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 21:31, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Inserting inappropriate content on a fanon article. Potentially an alternate account created by IAmBob. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 15:51, August 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * Addendum to this blockcheck: vandalism to the fanon article. Doesn't this prove that we need more people with a sysop flag ? >_> --SuperSajuuk Talk Page
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 16:37, August 31, 2014 (UTC)
 * - Spamming everyone and the wiki about a game that doesn't even exist, despite warning after warning to stop doing it. Indefinite block is advised here (Snapper originally suggested a year block, but it's obvious this user doesn't contribute, so indefinite would be better) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 21:56, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * I am not dealing with this guy anymore, since warnings don't work with him. has violated the talkpage policy more than three times. He has also used bad language on another user's talkpage on top of spamming the wiki and has added a "Candidates for Deletion" tag on his page. Please, block him for a year or indefinitely. -- WindStar7125  WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 00:58, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ I've dealt with him. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Rinnegan Sasuke.svg 01:15, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * - I may be wrong, but I'm suspecting this is another account used to create blank articles, similar to User talk:Lidia.barcelos.10 and a host of others I can't remember. If a sysop could look into this, I'd appreciate it. :) --Sajuuk Talk Page 14:17, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Warned by Cerez. If they continue to make empty articles you can bring it up again. ~SnapperTo 18:00, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * continously adding info that is not needed even when warned multiple times Munchvtec (talk) 13:02, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * Not vandalism. ~SnapperTo 18:00, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * Not vandalism. ~SnapperTo 18:00, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Forum-related requests

 * Please close these threads. Sorry if ever there's a double link. Thank you!:
 * Thread:120116
 * Thread:120403
 * Thread:120792
 * Thread:121672
 * Thread:121912
 * Thread:121907
 * Thread:121634
 * Thread:122204-Not sure if this will be closed.
 * Thread:122584
 * Thread:121847
 * Thread:122332
 * Thread:122497
 * Thread:122579
 * Thread:122960
 * Thread:123202
 * Thread:122876
 * Thread:122465
 * Thread:122369
 * Thread:122748
 * Thread:123275
 * Thread:122849
 * Thread:123540-ItachiWasAHero somehow answered it.
 * Thread:123976
 * Thread:123885
 * Thread:122825
 * Thread:124021
 * Thread:124203
 * Thread:124302
 * Thread:124886
 * ~IndxcvNovelist (talk 11:36, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't agree with this at all and do not recommend it be carried out. Closing threads just because they've been answered or haven't been responded to in a while is an extremely bad move and will give the impression that nobody can have a discussion as someone will just come along and close their thread. The threads being open and inactive is better than closing them all. --Speysider Talk Page 11:38, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not even going to hide how stupid I find that reasoning Speysider, but I won't close them then.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 11:43, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * It may just be your opinion, Spey. I'm pretty sure others would not mind creating new threads. I thought you're encouraging others to have few threads with similar topic rather than to have a thread with over a hundred replies? ~IndxcvNovelist (talk 11:48, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * Should probably amend. I won't close them, for now.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 12:05, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * It does seem pointless to go closing threads over the wiki when they have already died.
 * Closing should only be done when its just an announcement and requires no discussion or if the discussion seems to be going too off-topic or the like...~Ultimate Supreme  12:25, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^ This. --Speysider Talk Page 12:30, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * I think this script will work for us--~Ultimate Supreme  11:49, June 6, 2014 (UTC)


 * Thread:126207 - Leading nowhere and the OP is simply resorting to making pointless, off topic posts that consist of personal attacks against random users. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 23:20, August 7, 2014 (UTC)


 * Thread:135607 - Thread is useless and serves no purpose. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 15:59, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅~Ultimate Supreme  16:51, August 28, 2014 (UTC)


 * Thread:139432 - Pairing discussion. Didn't notice it at first, but since it's got a lot of posts, requesting it to be closed to new posts (leaving it visible) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 21:57, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Legit question: Why?--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 23:49, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Pairing discussions aren't allowed, right? They're unnecesary. I think that's why. According to here. -- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 23:53, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah. That thing. No idea how it ended as I just said my one comment and never went back. Well just to point out, if that thing is accurate shouldn't we also purge the "Sasuke" discussions as well?--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 23:55, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * According to that thread I just linked, I think so.-- WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 23:57, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * I haven't looked at the Sasuke discussions, but are they bad? I only intended to request the locking of the pairing discussion. :P --Sajuuk Talk Page 09:32, September 15, 2014 (UTC)


 * This is just a general request to all sysops: I would appreciate it if there could be more active monitoring of specific threads on the forums, specifically the new chapter discussion threads. They seem to be getting out of control with useless posts, pyramid quoting and illegal links/images. Thanks. --Sajuuk Talk Page 18:36, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

 * Okay, so I guess I would try this. Can someone update this page, specifically the Contact the Community? section? (May be optional though since this page is unused.) Thanks. :) ~IndxcvNovelist (talk 17:06, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * I reduced the protection. If you have some idea about what to update the page with (as I have no idea), you should be able to do it yourself. ~SnapperTo 17:59, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you :). ~IndxcvNovelist (talk 11:52, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * This is specifically up to the sysops, but I'm requesting that Kind-Hearted-One and Aged Goblin have their rollback flags removed, as they don't seem to be active (their last edits were on 28th May and 30th June respectively) and don't appear to be reverting vandalism regularly enough to require the flag. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 17:17, August 20, 2014 (UTC)