User talk:SuperSaiyaMan

Archive
I fixed the issue with your archive, since you seem to have done the first archive incorrectly, then tried again and created Archive 2 by mistake. Contents of Archive 2 are now in Archive 1 and I've tagged A2 for deletion as it appears to be accidental. :) --Speysider Talk Page 17:25, April 27, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Stop Adding that Picture
Oi man the only reason I was doing it at that time was because there weren't better pictures available than the ones I added. I admit it was pretty bad quality though, at least now there is a better version of the picture.--ElvinWindSword (talk) 19:22, May 28, 2014 (UTC)

rude
Don't be a brat. If you have a problem with me, go after me directly instead of complaining to other people.--Elveonora (talk) 21:26, July 11, 2014 (UTC)

Really? Then I must have imagined Tobirama and the other Senju standing there when Madara was on the ground--Elveonora (talk) 21:34, July 11, 2014 (UTC)

So they were only standing there 24 hours and watching or they were chilling somewhere and entered the premises only once he was defeated or something like that, you say. And Tobirama who according to you didn't fight him had all rights to attempt a murder on Madara, because that makes so much sense.--Elveonora (talk) 21:40, July 11, 2014 (UTC)

Question
I'd just like to ask a question and please don't feel it's intrusive. I was looking through the rights logs and am wondering how you got the rollback flag on your account? The logs don't seem to indicate the reason as to why and I can't find any message that you may have left enquiring into asking about them. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 14:48, July 14, 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the help. Can you do something about Momochanx3. All he's been doing is put in false or biased shipping in the relationship thing. I politely told him to stop doing that as he could get suspended by the admins but he doesn't listen and continues to edit to his NaruSaku shipping standards instead of what is actually happening in the manga itself.--Michma12 (talk) 02:16, August 22, 2014 (UTC)

re: Elveonora @ Snapper's site
Being wrong and ignorant is not a "crime". Being rude isn't alright and I'm sorry it frustrates you, but it's not a cause for blocking someone. I'll leave it to those who have the rights to act on it to warn him first. The man who passes the sentence should swing the sword, after all. ~Hakinu (talk 21:33, August 24, 2014 (UTC)


 * I would be lying if I said I'm surprised. It wouldn't be on every day's order for SuperSaiyan to not plot how to fracture my skull with a metal pipe or something. You must really hate me, since you constantly want me gone--Elveonora (talk) 08:23, August 25, 2014 (UTC)


 * You people need to be civil about this. It's about a cartoon, for crying out loud. ~Hakinu Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk 09:21, August 25, 2014 (UTC)

hey
What you just stated in that edit summary; wouldnt it be best to say it on his talk page. just a thought. Munchvtec (talk) 06:16, November 2, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Can you stop deleting information you don't like?
The comment you put on Gemnist's talk page... lmao... Not trying to tease you, but I find it hilarious coming from a user who used to refer himself as "NaruHina fan" XD • WindStar7125     15:59, November 2, 2014 (UTC)

Forum Warning #1

 * I expect a lot more maturity from a rollback, SuperSaiyaMan. Even Elveonora dropped the subject. I suggest you do the same. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 08:04, November 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * No worries. But that was a classic example on why I refrain from getting into it with users in the forums. Look, I understand it's a debate board, but let's not make it personal by throwing insults calling others "biased." Not trying to ridicule you, but this is a painful truth: Those who call others "biased" are usually look biased themselves. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 08:31, November 4, 2014 (UTC)

Naruto Couples
I want to know your reasoning behind your edits on Naruto Couples Wiki? If you are not the person who put NaruHina, SasuSaku, and SaiIno into the Canon Couples section as well as placing NaruSaku into the Fanon Couples section, then please disregard. But if it was you, then I want to hear why? --Jtw2014 (talk) 03:27, November 6, 2014 (UTC)Jtw2014

Re: What happened to Sasuke's article?
I have no clue. Glitch in the system, I guess. • WindStar7125     01:15, November 7, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Kind of common knowledge at this point...
The same can be said to you. First off, yes, Hinata is on the poster, along with Naruto, Sasuke, Sakura, Kakashi, Sai, and Shikamaru. Nana Mizuki is a singer, she sings! Characters, not just the main ones, get their own characters songs in numerous animes. But that does not mean she's been promoted to "main character over Sakura". That's the problem. You know what? I'm taking this to the talk page on Hinata's article. I'm going to continue my statement over there.-- Ninja Sheik  03:00, November 8, 2014 (UTC)

1.) Exactly! You have the read the edit over more carefully! 2.) WindStar7125 is right. You need to stop being bias in your edits, you know. I know you got into conflicts with other editors because of it. Anyway, since you finally realized the way I reverted the edit, I'll take my leave now.-- Ninja Sheik  04:56, November 8, 2014 (UTC)

Alright then...
To avoid users crying of spoilers, is all of that true? ~• WS7125 [Mod] 00:26, November 29, 2014 (UTC)

revert wars
Is there any particular reason why you feel a need to constantly get into revert wars with other editors over your edits? When someone reverts your edit, do not go and immediately revert it and restore your edit: instead, take your issue to the articles talkpage and reach a conclusion with the other editors. Your constant edit warring is getting pretty annoying and disruptive, not to mention the fact that it violates the 3RR, so I would start thinking about the policy before you revert any more edits you are involved in. --Sajuuk Talk Page 11:39, November 30, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Itachi
That doesn't matter to me. What I mentioned was that your wording wasn't at all good. I agree with you, but the original wording was better written. -- Koto Talk Page-My Contributions 21:45, December 10, 2014 (UTC)

Question: Toneri and TSB
What color were Toneri's chakra orbs in those "HD images?" ~• WS7125 [Mod] 00:16, December 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay. The reason I asked is because of what FF-Suzaku said here. He said that Toneri has "Chakra Orbs - Not confirmed to be Truthseeker Orbs but that's what most people are calling them, and they reportedly work the same way. His presumably glow green because they're infused with chakra from his Tenseigan Chakra Mode." Just be mindful of that. ~• WS7125 [Mod]WindStar7125 Task.svgWindStar7125's Task.svg 00:19, December 17, 2014 (UTC)

Ōtsutsuki clan KKG
Can you give me a source where it was stated that the Rinnegan and Rinne Sharingan are KKG of this clan please? -- WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 01:01, January 15, 2015 (UTC)
 * Never mind, already handled. I say this advice kindly, and I do not mean to be condescending and rude when I say this (and if I do, I apologize, that is not my intent), but please verify things next time rather than just insert popular assumptions or opinions in articles. I, along with other users, have particularly seen you do that a lot. It is the reason why things like this happen to you and accusations of bias from other users such as this and as well as this tend to be thrown at you sometimes. I do not hold anything against you, nor am I trying to call you out or insult you, but please work on toning that down. -- WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 01:33, January 15, 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, yes, you clearly did think that, my question is, where was that indicated or stated? This is what I am talking about. Please do not insert things in articles because you "just thought they were." Each user cannot insert statements in articles with the mentality of doing so "just because I think it is." You have to know. Edits of that particular nature must be either sourced, or taken to the talkpage and agreed on with a consensus. The Ōtsutsuki clan had the Byakugan before encountering the chakra fruit. Everything else was after. Like I said, I do not want to put you on blast or anything, for you are not the only user that does this, but you do it a lot, so please take heed to the advice I am telling you. -- WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 01:51, January 15, 2015 (UTC)

Genjutsu immunity
Yo! Could you tell me your source for this edit? • Seelentau 愛 議 15:44, January 19, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Was going by...
Not that I'm aware and I can't seem to find such a statement anywhere. Hence my question. • Seelentau 愛 議 19:05, January 19, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Hey, I need a little translation help!
木ノ葉の白狼 Konoha no Hakurō. • Seelentau 愛 議 19:49, March 6, 2015 (UTC)

Forum use
Do not make threads in the forums asking pointless questions like "Should we add a Fanfiction forum?". You know absolutely perfectly well we do NOT allow fanon here, I have deleted your thread. --Sajuuk talk 20:08, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * There is the Naruto Fanon Wiki. You may go there for fanfiction. 21:01, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * Special:Forum is a thing. If you scroll down, it specifically says "Shipping discussions and fanfiction stories are PROHIBITED." Which, is why your thread drew the rage of SuperSajuuk and why it was not only removed, but deleted. I am going to quote myself from this comment:
 * "WindStar7125"

- If you want to talk about fanon, go to the Naruto Fanon Wiki. If you want to talk about pairings, go to the Naruto Couples Wiki. It's just that simple.


 * Hence, the rule in the Special:Forum page. There is a Naruto Fanon Wiki for fanfiction/fanon, and a Naruto Couples Wiki for pairings/shippings. I know you did not have had any ill intent, but this wiki does not condone either of those options because they bring forth unnecessary controversy and are detrimental to the wiki. Therefore, the reason for the creation of those two wikis. 21:40, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * Not only what WindStar said, but you've been here since 2007. I don't need to keep threads up from users who should really know better (also, you should be aware that your thread and the reply you posted to WindStar just made you a complete hypocrite). --Sajuuk talk 21:43, April 4, 2015 (UTC)

re: ItachiWasAHero
I've dealt with him. Also, if you have requests for me, please take it to this page. 03:50, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * Just be sure you don't accidentally piss off Sajuuk again. x) 03:55, April 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * Not blatantly, but you didn't show that much maturity either. I don't know what is with you getting into heated debates with users, whether it be edit warring in the mainspace or getting into it in the forums, but this will be told to you again: You've been here since 2007. You should know better. 01:11, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

Re: More Translation help
You could actually put those together yourself, you know? :P Anyway, it's 八卦六十四獅拳 Hakke Rokujūyon Shiken and 柔歩双獅螺旋丸 Jūho Sōshi Rasengan. • Seelentau 愛 議 19:37, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Forum Warning #2

 * Sorry, but I have to mirror WindStar's sentiments, after reading many of the posts you've been posting in the versus debates. --Sajuuk talk 20:29, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * Generally, if there are users who state things that were never stated in the manga, then telling them once or twice wouldn't be an issue. However, you do it far too much. And as I pointed out, not everything you say is supported by the manga either (for instance: trying to get away with stating that the CB - Susanoo requires EMS or Six Paths Chakra, when that was stated no where), so it is very strange that you do it so often to others as well.
 * You can disagree with others' opinions without resorting to dismissing them because they don't have enough evidence, by pointing them to evidence that they can read to educate themselves. Going around basically saying "you have no evidence, you have nothing" is unhelpful.
 * 21:15, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, the final decision should be left to a forum moderator. You are already aware of the forum requests page, so you can leave a request there for an intervention of a forum mod or forum op in a thread that might get out of control. But please try to avoid dismissing a user just because you believe them not to have any evidence: educating the user by pointing them at articles on the wiki will help them to understand better. --Sajuuk talk 21:28, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * ^What he said. 21:29, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

Minato's prowess
I am not trying to deny Minato's limits at all. I am merely trying to clarify the nature of them.—Steveo920 (Talk) 22:48 April 16, 2015

re: avatar
...looks like something I'd expect from you, NaruHina fan. 00:35, April 18, 2015 (UTC)

Oh, you'll find this to be hilarious
Hehehe... just rolf. 05:26, April 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * Disturbed? 01:42, April 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * Technically, that was me being facetious. 01:54, April 28, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Can you upload...
Done. I would've uploaded them sooner, but I didn't like the quality, nor do I like it now >.<, but since you've personally asked for 'em.--Omojuze (talk) 18:35, April 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * Rebecca (a.k.a KazeKitsune) already did, so I won't bother anymore if that's Ok?--Omojuze (talk) 11:03, April 28, 2015 (UTC)

re: infobox
I'm not a sysop, can't do it. Sorry. But I did request them to unlock it. 05:42, July 2, 2015 (UTC)
 * Still protected, but Foxie came through. 06:20, July 2, 2015 (UTC)

Re:
As much as I'd like getting called as "not liking to list Naruto's feats", I'm more interested in summarizing the main points of the abilities intro than adding extensive detail like you've been doing. Naruto could barely get past one tailed beast without Kurama's help, and defeating five of them at the same time required both of them to team up. If you were to list that feat, you'd have to add Kurama because Naruto didn't defeat the five on his own, he used Kurama's full power. And using a tailed beast's power as a jinchuriki is better mentioned in the "Jinchuriki Transformation" section below than in the intro. --SSJ2AJB (talk) 04:53, July 7, 2015 (UTC)