Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-36019309-20190114073523/@comment-35409024-20190205053621

Jason Wrote: AGAIN! i don't think this example suits YOUR definition of the meaning that was provided for 'immediately' She is 0.0 seconds fast or something? that's google itself telling to you that the word doesn't mean what you think it means. "She was sitting without any intervening time or space behind me" makes just as much sense as "she was sitting 0.0 seconds behind me" so your argument fails. Zero is just the term i am using for the fact there is no time that transpires when immediately and instantly takes place. No intervening time. There is no time that intervenes with immediately or instantly. So when something happens instantly, it happens with no intervening time. You can whine all you want, but the illusion of Tsukiyomi has time based off your example from the novel and nothing you can twist or do can change that. Your argument is invalid. Jason Wrote: NOw also taking things literally this was the scan you posted According to what Asuma said you would get that tsukuyomi is above a second right? but Asuma can only and only did make his statement after he heard Kakashi drop to the ground. Now take these into thought and you'll see that Tsukuyomi is under a second in terms of speed. Time is subtracted from that second because it takes some time for Kakashi to fall to the ground. Which is when Asuma will be notified. Still doesn't prove it happens instantly. Jason Wrote: Might not be alot but it's still under a second, the only problem here is your misunderstanding of the term which doesn't translate to 0 second which i need visual evidence to be convinced because i can't really take your interpretation of it seeing as how you greatly misinterpreted what Kakashi said in shippuden about tsukuyomi being instantly...woh which by the way means that Kakashi was saying that 'Itachi has you in his genjutsu in 0.0 seconds'? oh wow😂😂. I think i made an error in the first part of this but still You just got debunked oon this last part.. I don't need visual proof because it states no intervening time. Let me change it up for a moment and speak on your level since you seemingly can't comprehend common sense. The only misunderstanding here is you not knowing what that means. Lol. If there is no time, then there is no time. The Illusion has time therefore cannot be what Kakashi was referring too. "which by the way means that Kakashi was saying that 'Itachi has you in his genjutsu in 0.0 seconds'?" Debunked? That's exactly right. There isn't a single second that takes place before you are put in Tsukuyomi after looking into Itachi's eyes. But if not, please prove me wrong. Show me where Itachi has never put someone instantly inside Tsukuyomi after making eye contact? Show me where Tsukuyomi isn't cast in 0.0 seconds. Jason Wrote: Here's your proof. I think requesting proof that is not there is the biggest hyperbole in the history of hyperboles. I dare you to say Bee can't break tsukuyomi, i don't think you can because you believe that he can break it. You believe in facts and facts alone? the current available facts is that he can't, believe that. Well Gaara can use ultra instincts, prove me wrong..after seeing Madara what would make you think that Gaara wouldn't learn a very destructive move to stop a foe like Madara? i need facts😂😂 give me😂.That's how you sound...... "I dare you to say Bee can't break tsukuyomi, i don't think you can because you believe that he can break it." This made me laugh. Grade school logic. Sounds like it came from a five year old. That same argument can be applied to the other side. "I dare you to say Bee can break tsukuyomi, i don't think you can because you believe that he can't break it." Pure crap. I won't say either. Why? Cause there's no proof for either side. Your "proof" is just a page. If you going to post a page i suggest you point at the "proof" or quote it. If not, it's irrelevant. I'm not going to waste my time to find your "proof" for you. Lol. Read it, didn't see any proof. Moving on.