Talk:Six Paths Ten-Tails Coffin Seal

Mito and the Sage
Just for the heck of it, both Mito and The Sage should have this technique, and we should change the title to make it more generic. Both Mito and The Sage are notable individuals who have been said were able to and have sealed tailed beast into themselves. Why not? It's been a long time coming and the opportunity prevents itself clearly now. I vote we change to name to "Tailed Beast Self-Sealing Technique". KotoSenju (OldUser:JaZZBaND)-Talk-Contributions 09:46, July 9, 2013 (UTC)


 * I agree about the fact it is the same seal the Sage used, but about Mito, I don't think so.--JOA20 (talk) 10:58, July 9, 2013 (UTC)


 * Sage maybe. Mito, wut?--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 11:55, July 9, 2013 (UTC)

Mito.. Wait.. What? Mito has only had Kurama sealed within her.. Not the Ten Tails? Where did that idea even come from? SusanooUnleashed (talk) 12:05, July 9, 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm thinking add the Sage too, since his seal design is exactly this and it can't be just a coincidence. Kishi is definitely giving us a clue here. But Mito? No. This is a specific seal (as it has now appeared on two Ten-Tails jinchūriki), we just don't know its name. We don't know what Mito did. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Yamagakure Symbol.svg 18:47, July 9, 2013 (UTC)

We don't know if the stuff on Obito's back is the seal. We also don't know if this was the technique used by the sage. Please don't add speculation to articles. All of you should know that by now. Seelentau 愛議 18:50, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * So a seal, that wasn't there before, appearing on someone's back after a sealing technique is somehow unrelated to the seal and is speculation? Please explain that to me Seelentau. I'm interested to see how you spin that one. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Yamagakure Symbol.svg 18:53, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Why do people always think this is how such things work? X is not "right until proven wrong". X is "wrong until proven right". If you say "X is Y", it's your job to provide proof since you're making that statement and not my job when I say "No, you're wrong". Seelentau 愛議 18:58, July 9, 2013 (UTC)


 * I made my case. The seal appeared on his back after using an unnamed sealing technique to imprison the Beast within his body. It also happens to be the same seal which appears on the Sage's back, who was also a container of the exact same Beast. Furthermore, Madara notes that Obito used the "power of the Six Paths Sage", so it is very possible that this is the same, or a similar, technique that the Sage used to imprison the Beast in his body. While that last bit is iffy, there is certainly enough evidence to suggest that the markings on Obito's back is the seal. More evidence for it than there is against it. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Yamagakure Symbol.svg 19:04, July 9, 2013 (UTC)


 * So what you're saying is this:
 * The sign on Obito's back resembles the sign on the RS's mantle. Since both are or were containers for the same beast, it can be assumed that the sign on both of their backs is the result of a sealing technique.
 * Then please explain why the sign looks a bit different, why is it on the RS's mantle and not his back and why did he have it even after the beast was released and split into the tailed beasts? Seelentau 愛議 19:09, July 9, 2013 (UTC)

Obito could have designed a fuuinjutsu after Sage cloak's design. But that wouldn't explain how would Obito or anyone know what Sage wore ;D--Elveonora (talk) 19:46, July 9, 2013 (UTC)


 * Exactly. What Seenlantau suggest is that its all just coincidental. Like that's ever been Kishi's policy. Its obvious that its the seal. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Yamagakure Symbol.svg 19:47, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Taking everything into consideration, it indeed is unlikely to be a coincidence. Also @Seel, ur forgetting that Naruto's new seal also appears on his clothes and not just skin, so it certainly isn't anything new or impossible. Why would the seal vanish once the Ten-Tails has been removed?--Elveonora (talk) 19:52, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * I am with @TTF on this, the mark on Obito's back resembles the Sage and they possessed the same beast, at least the mark recalls a fūinjutsu seal, about Mito using this technique it is out of question. Dan.Faulkner (talk) 20:51, July 9, 2013 (UTC)

I don't suggest that at all. It's just that I don't want to see anything speculative added in any article. But it seems to become common behaviour here to do so. If we'd act like that, then why aren't Hashirama's torii and Naruto's torii merged? They're obviously the same, since they look the same and work the same. Going by your logic we'd have to merge those articles (and any other stuff that shares some things). @Elveonora, a seal vanishes when it's released, doesn't it? Seelentau 愛議 21:39, July 9, 2013 (UTC)


 * Not all the time. We've seen that Minato's seal for his Flying Thunder God stays active constantly, even after he died. Joshbl56  22:12, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, because that's a technique formula, not a seal. Seelentau 愛議 22:17, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * @Josh, exactly. Danzo's technique vanished, but Orochimaru's Cursed Seals stay for example and by u mentioned Hiraishin. Depends on seal more than likely. Why would a seal from a jinchuuriki vanish once the beast has been removed? Makes no sense, unless it's been removed to extract a beast, but there are more ways to do so. @Seel, about Naruto and Hashirama's seemingly common technique, that's more speculative because there's no known connection. In Naruto's case, it's something he did only in the mental thingy and seemingly can't do so in real world, while in the latter's case it's a Sage technique and corporeal. Also no difference between a formula and a seal--Elveonora (talk) 22:22, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Whatever? They look the same and they work the same, by your logic they've to be the same. What's with these double standards? And a formula is a formula, a seal is a seal. A seal seals something in someone/thing, a formula doesn't. Otherwise, the HnJ would be a fūinjutsu. Seelentau 愛議 05:53, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * Its not the same thing. One was done in Naruto's mind, unconsciously, without him declaring a technique. The other is a Sage technique invented by Hashirama with a clearly defined name. Here we have two people with the exact same Tailed beast sealed within them, who also have the exact same seal design (give or take the "tail appendage on Obito's upper magatama being the only difference), so logic would dictate that its the seal. Secondly, a seal produces a formula on the sealed target; always. We saw it with the Dead Demon Consuming Seal, the Iron Armour Seal, even the sealing formulas on Minato's Flying Thunder God Technique. The evidence stacks up against it not being the sealing formula, so that's what we're going with. If I recall correctly, nowhere was it stated in the manga that Killer B's "iron" tattoo was the Iron Armor Seal, but the sheer obviousness of the circumstances lead it to being called so. So, now I"ll throw your question back at you. Why the double standards? ~ Ten Tailed Fox Yamagakure Symbol.svg 06:08, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * The difference between Naruto's and Hashirama's seal is as little as the difference between Obito's and RS's seal.
 * Again, the HnJ doesn't use seals, it uses formulas. There's an obvious difference between a sealing formula, used to seal stuff into something, and a technique formula, used for the technique.
 * Of course, there's no evidence that the tattoo on B's arm is the seal itself. We'd have to remove it.
 * I changed the wording in this article a bit, now I'm more okay with it. You too? Seelentau 愛議 06:26, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm fine with it the way it is now. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Yamagakure Symbol.svg 06:30, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

Menma
Ignoring the design upon which it is concluded to be a fuuinjutsu used specifically to seal the Ten-Tails, it looks like what Menma did to recall Kurama back into his body in the movie--Elveonora (talk) 20:06, July 9, 2013 (UTC)