Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-1251315-20140820175011/@comment-4271790-20140908190426

SuperSajuuk wrote:

@Windstar: I disagree that a sysop can't be unbiased. UltimateSupreme, for example, is generally neutral in all discussions and focuses more on the wiki's scripts and css, yet can get involved in discussions as a devil's advocate when necessary. That's the kind of sysop I'd like to see more of: people who don't contribute a lot to talkpages/mainspace but are there to jump in and give a neutral opinion or give warnings to users to tone it down. Here's the thing: You don't see @UltimateSupreme as much, now do you? According to your first post that started this discussion, You're asking for an admin who here a lot more often (than say, the great @Dantman is) and, according to later comments, an admin who is unbiased. UltimateSupreme is considered unbiased by you because he isn't here as much as @TheUltimate3, @Ten Tailed Fox or @Snapper2 to give his opinion. I'm certainly not knocking or disrespecting @UltimateSupreme, don't get me wrong, but if he were here more often to give his opinion on the Naruto series, there would surely be users who would disagree. If you think about it, when exactly is an opinion here "neutral" and not responded to and disagreed on?