User talk:ShounenSuki/Timeline

Im sorry if this makes me sound dumb but i was kinda wonderin wat the abbreviations stood 4 on here....--Moiz1224 (talk) 03:36, February 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * BNT: Before Nine-tails. ANT: After Nine-Tails. Simant (talk) 04:08, February 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * What Simant said ^^ --ShounenSuki (talk 08:17, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

15ANT
I know people might not look at this but since i'm doing a timeline myself(of my own non naruto series), so I wanted to see a model, I noticed that there is no 15ANT. --KiumaruHamachi (talk) 19:41, February 11, 2010 (UTC)KiumaruHamachi

how did u get 150 BNT
How did you get 150 BNT? --KiumaruHamachi (talk) 01:18, August 12, 2010 (UTC)KiumaruHamachi

Hi
I kind of like your timeline^_^...Ilnarutoanime (Talk-Contribs.-Images) 04:45, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

First Fanbook - Hiden: Hyō no Sho, page 152
First Fanbook - Hiden: Hyō no Sho, page 152 <= I doubt that this is the correct source... on said page, you can find a timeline about Kishimoto-sama. Seelentau 愛議 02:44, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, when Naruto met his mother, he said he was 16. That means, at that time it should still be 16 ANT and not 17, ShounenSuki :/ Why did you even chose to use the Kyūbi attack as a basic? Why not the series start, as we do. Seelentau 愛議 02:53, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * I know about that time line. Unfortunately, it's not that detailed and only covers the history of the Academy.
 * As for any mistakes in this time line, well, I cannot say I've been paying too much attention to this page lately. There are several other users that edit it, you see. Feel free to fix any mistakes.
 * I picked the Kyūbi attack as the starting point because that's not only the most important event in the series, but also one of the few events we know the exact date for. —ShounenSuki (talk 14:03, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * What timeline do you mean? I'm just saying the reference is wrong, but I don't know the timeline you mgiht refering to Seelentau 愛議 14:16, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm sorry. I think I misunderstood you. No, the reference is correct. Page 152 of the first fanbook is the first page of an article about the Academy and goes into its history. There's a small time line on that page showing when several events in the Academy's history took place.
 * The fanbook also has a time line of Kishimoto-sensei's personal history, but that is on pages 206 and 207. —ShounenSuki (talk 15:16, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * uh... well, in the German version, Kishimoto's timeline starts on page 152 and the Academy's timeline on page 116... Do you perhaps know where I can download a raw of this fanbook? Because this is quite confusing Oo Seelentau 愛議 16:06, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't believe it has ever been put on the Internet in full. —ShounenSuki (talk 16:15, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * meh... but it would mean that in the German version some pages are missing, right? O.o Here you can see what's on page 152 in the German version... Seelentau 愛議 16:25, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yup, that's page 206 with me. I guess the German version might have cut out all the fan-related stuff. —ShounenSuki (talk 18:48, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay, that's... stupid >.< Anyways, in the German version, the text says that the Academy was founded ~50 years prior, but the time line says 60 years. Can you solve that? In the German version, the time line looks like this and that would mean the Academy was founded 60 years ago along with Konoha. Seelentau 愛議 19:03, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * That looks pretty much how the Japanese time line looks, except that one says it's the first 36 graduates. I think the time line says the Academy was founded about 55 years before the start of the series. —ShounenSuki (talk 19:21, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, 36 and not 35, my mistake^^' Okay, so the Academy was founded 5 years after the inception of Konoha. That means, Hashirama was not longer than 5 years Hokage... interesting ^_^ Seelentau 愛議 19:25, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

The Itachi issue
Hi ShounenSuki. As you can see here and here, I corrected the time line according to the given dates. But I only considered years and months, not days. Also, I tried to create a picture for the time line, here. Now I don't think every conclusion I came to is correct, that's why I've to bring this topic up again. So, please feel free to correct my mistakes, but please point them out here before you do so. Seelentau 愛議 01:12, July 4, 2011 (UTC)