Board Thread:Versus Debates/@comment-43403813-20190907005521/@comment-38812954-20191002122355

more like them unconsciously saying what i say and i pick up on it.

"@Senjutsu Sage are you still using that ridiculous argument claiming people are unconsciously agreeing with you? Why do you keep telling people that they agree with you when they clearly do not?" loool, this felt like a lot of emotion to me.

Ohh, well i watched the anime. and i re-watched it and what you said was right. it was because of him using water style and his shuriken what not. And after that he instantly appeared behind kakashi. but what i drew from that is that it had to be genjutsu because he went behind kakashi so fast and put a clone in place of himself where he was (infront of kakashi). he didn't even use hand signs. the kashi with the kunai to his back was revealed to be a water clone. kisame said it should be considered an honour that he copied their jutsu. kashi was under water with a kunai in his hand. kurenai saw him. talked to herself saying good job kakashi or what ever. kashi jumps out of the water grabs kurenai and jumps away, "get back kurenai this one is a clone"

So... "And how exactly does Itachi showing up behind him prove that the one in front of him was a clone? Either one could be the clone, it was Kakashi's observation that allowed him to deduce which was which, not Itachi's attack." the itachi that put the kunai to his back was the real itachi. because the itachi that was infront of kakashi when he had the kunai to his back was the one that exploded.

lol, in any event. it so looked like it was genjutsu. he did shit so fast. it seemed like danzo's izanagi vs shisui.

nahh. interpreted it exactly how it was said. till squinty came along and explained what you really meant for you.