Talk:Itachi Uchiha

quick notice
Itachi appeared in Sasuke's memories in chapter 127. I dunno if that counts. Seelentau 愛議 17:00, September 26, 2011 (UTC)

Source of Disease
I can't remember, wasn't it stated sometime ago that Zetsu's spores (or something) were responsible for Itachi's terminal illness? Skitts (talk) 02:00, October 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nope.--Cerez365™Hyūga Symbol.svg 02:10, October 3, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I think I was confusing it with something about Kabuto. Skitts (talk)
 * Yeah, Madara had Zetsu put spores on Kabuto probably to keep track of him. We were never told anything about Itachi's illness.--Cerez365™Hyūga Symbol.svg 02:56, October 3, 2011 (UTC)

Clarification on edit 547189
...despite B's style being acclaimed for its difficultly to both read and dodge successfully.


 * A noun is needed here, not an adverb.

After being ressurrected by Kabuto...


 * The above spelling is incorrect, whether by UK conventions or American conventions.

--— Limxzero (talk) 15:34, October 5, 2011 (UTC)

Ablities
In Chapter 548 first page it s said that itachi is together with nagato the most powerful edo tensei soldier i think you should add this.
 * That's not what the one I read says. It referred to them being Madara's most powerful/trusted soldiers.--Cerez365™Hyūga Symbol.svg 17:08, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah it s says Madara s most powerful and trusted soldiers the meaning of this is they both are his best soldiers that means their stronger than  the others.
 * Yeah but we don't put too much stock in what is written on the side of pages (I remember seeing that somewhere) If anything Kisame was his most trusted soldier. Nagato would have been a very valuable asset and Itachi, Madara himself likened him to a "thorn in his side" or something like that. See how conflicting it is?--Cerez365™Hyūga Symbol.svg 13:51, October 18, 2011 (UTC)

Nekomata
So where is nekomata here in itachi's childhood background? SLAYER13PH (talk) 03:32, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

Because it is an anime-only occurrence in an anime only arc, it is in the Konoha History Section. Skitts (talk) 03:50, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

@Skitts maybe we should put it to his background anyway to give him credit, at young age he was able to defeat nekomata. SLAYER13PH (talk) 05:28, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

For reasons already stated, it's going to be kept at the Kohona History section. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 17:46, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

Crow
Maybe we can put crow summoning at itachi's jutsu?SLAYER13PH (talk) 05:35, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * No. Itachi sure had an affinity to use crow related techniques, but that doesn't mean he summoned them. For all we know, he does something similar to Aoba, and the word used for his use of crows in the databook is different from the word used for summons in the series. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 17:46, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

Itachi's Crow is most likely just a crow, not summon. Something like Akamaru ... just a normal dog. And Itachi's other crows are just a genjutsu. --Elveonora (talk) 01:05, November 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not as cut and dry as that. From what we know, he has more than one crow and they're probably real since they left a fair bit of feather behind in chapter 368 after Itachi's encounter with Sasuke. Whether or not they are summoned creatures or just living under Itachi's Akatsuki mantle is something Kishimoto hasn't told us.--Cerez365™Hyūga Symbol.svg 01:19, November 12, 2011 (UTC)

Oh you are right, sorry. He has more "real" crows. Then I guess he has a magic cloak or the crows are really summons. Don't want to theorize much, but I think the crows are gift from Shisui along with his eye, thus Shisui's power. --Elveonora (talk) 01:24, November 12, 2011 (UTC)

Chakra Flow
Can we put Fire Chakra Flow to itachi's ability section? i think he can use it with other weapons like shuriken, swords etc. SLAYER13PH (talk) 05:40, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's already mentioned. Second paragraph in the ninjutsu section. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 17:46, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

Death
In the article, it is said: "With that act, Itachi finally gave in to his fatal illness, which he had been using medication and sheer willpower to fend off, and died." With the term "gave in" (which means in the context: "give up fighting againt the fatal illness") in the sentence, it means that only his sheer willpower allowed to fend off his fatal illness. So, it means that during a long time, Itachi fend off his fatal illness by using medication and sheer willpower. And in the moment where he began to spit blodd in the battle against Sasuke, this indicated that medicines no longer made effect, and only his sheer willpower still allowed to fend off his illness, hence the term "gave in" in the sentence. Is that correct ? 41.248.195.6 (talk) 16:13, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * It appears he stopped taking medicine before the fight, and in the latter stages, was just keeping himself alive out of willpower. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 17:46, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

How does he keep himself alive in this case? Because, when we say in the article: he gave in to his fatal illness. It means for me, that he stopped to fight against the illness (=his sheer willpower was no longer present). And in the moment where he began to split blood, this indicated that the medicine no longer made effect. Is that correct? 41.249.84.122 (talk) 20:12, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:29, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

Infamous?
Isn't Itachi famous? --Ilnarutoanime 11:06, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's what 'infamous' means +1.--Cerez365™Hyūga Symbol.svg 11:38, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah okay... --Ilnarutoanime 13:48, October 29, 2011 (UTC)

his mate
Does not he/she deserves his/her own article ? --Elveonora (talk) 01:10, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Why o.O?--Cerez365™Hyūga Symbol.svg 01:13, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

(EditConflict X[)I think s/he was only mentioned a few times (less than 4 that I can think of) with no picture and only mentioned because of Itachi. Plus we're not sure what her/his gender is. So I'm gonna say no. Joshbl56  01:14, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Once, only by Tobi.--Cerez365™Hyūga Symbol.svg 01:16, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

Naruto mentioned the person as well and Itachi has not disproved. --Elveonora (talk) 01:24, December 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * True but just because they are mentioned doesn't mean they should get their own page. If that were so then we would also have a page on Kiba's Father. He's been mentioned several times (at least more than Itachi's mate). Joshbl56  01:27, December 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * (editconflict) Even if Naruto did, that still doesn't change the fact that we know nothing of the person except that Itachi killed them as well. That's not enough information to warrant an article. It's the same reason why articles aren't created for Kage we know nothing about even if they are known for example.--Cerez365™Hyūga Symbol.svg 01:29, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

You are right, sorry. --Elveonora (talk) 01:32, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

Deceased
shouldn't we say that he is like, revived or somthing! rather than deaceased, Am i missing somthing?--Charmanking2198 (talk) 21:46, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * We don't consider revived/resurrected as a status. It's not like Gaara, Kakashi or Fukasaku, who were brought back exactly as they were. I don't think Hashirama and Tobirama were listed as alive when Orochimaru brought them back either, though that was way before I knew what Naruto was. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:56, December 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * No, that would be like putting Third Kazekage down as puppet since that's what Sasori did to him. They are dead, nothing more. If someone wanted to see if they were revived then they would need to go here. Joshbl56  21:57, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

They're technically brought back, but it's temporary, as the soul is brought back to inhabit the sacrifice's body, unlike the case with Gaara. Skitts (talk) 22:01, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

so your saying that itachi is temporarly revived???--Charmanking2198 (talk) 09:28, December 22, 2011 (UTC)