Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-7292165-20180617235445/@comment-27797856-20180618160110

Dantman wrote: They used to be. The lack of dedicated staff and a laxer watch over articles sort of left it in a a mishmash.
 * To be explicitly clear. Are ShounenSuki's translations of the databook text being used directly in articles as paragraphs?
 * "Perfectly fine" texts are not exempt from attempts to improve them. The edit being discussed and berated appears to be a legitimate attempt to improve the wording of one of our articles. We explicitly mention wanting shorter and concise paragraphs in our Manual of Style and that appears to be one of the goals of the edit.

But trying does not equal succeeding... I can write an article that feels and sounds amazing to me, but It won't be the same for others (Saru might be able to vouch for this, given my possessive-obsessive behaviour in a wiki I used to edit in the past that he's a mod of) and there will always be someone who finds faults and flaws.