Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4521917-20161120182008/@comment-1251315-20161120183231

^ Per Ravenlot. It wasn't necessary the last time you proposed it (after also getting a stern warning about blindly removing content under your own personal canon rules) and it isn't necessary this time.

Content in articles is not removed just because one user deems part of the content to be non-canon, everything is included on the page if it's shown in an official medium.

It seems you are pretty determined to force this change through as well, you made this exact discussion 2 months ago, got no response, then created this new thread.