User talk:Inoyamanaka98

Hello, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the File:Chakra Hair Technique.png page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Omnibender (Talk) 00:45, 8 April 2013

Re: Ino Yamanaka info
Never said it was wrong. For filler arcs we started using the to direct readers to the arc section, unless they played a major role in said arc. Another reason info would actually be added would be if their article is "scant" which Ino's is not.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 01:55, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

This, again. Going to ask you to stop adding filler information to their articles now.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 20:26, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

WHY! WHY DO I HAVE TO STOP! WHATEVER I PUT YOU DELETE BUT WHATEVER YOU PUT YOU THINK ITS SO IMPORTANT THAT IS NOT RIGHT MAN AND SO MESS UP! I LIKE INO AND I WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE HER AND JUST B/C YOU DON'T LIKE HER MUCH DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU HAVE TO GO TO HER PAGE AND GET TO READING! FOCUS ON WHAT YOU LIKE AND I'LL FOCUS ON WHAT I LIKE! OR WHATEVER YOU PUT I'LL KEEP RIGHT ON DELETING! OK, OK THANK YOU! Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 20:31, April 30, 2013 (UTC)Inoyamanaka98Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 20:31, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

PS: I DIDN'T PUT THAT INFO ON HINATA PAGE I WAS JUST FIXING THE SPELLINGS SO DON'T YOU SEND ME THOSE RUDE MESSAGES ABOUT FILLING THE FILLERS. YOU THINK YOU HAVE A GREAT EXPERIENCE ON THIS AND WHOSE THEIR! I MEAN I ONLY EDIT INO'S PAGE THIS WEEK AND LAST! YOU DON'T OWN THIS WEBSITE YOU CAN'T TELL ME WHAT TO PUT UP OR NOT! WHEN YOU DELETED THAT INFO THAT PERSON PUT ON HINATA PAGE, YOU PUT NOT IMPORTANT ENOUGH WHICH MEANS THEY CAN PUT IT PUT THERE AGAIN AND MAKE SURE IT IS IMPORTANT BUT WHAT YOU SEND ME A RUDE MESSAGE. IF YOU DON'T LIKE INO THEN WHY DID YOU GO TO HER PAGE AND START READING WHAT IS UP THERE AND IF SHE IS NOT IMPORTANT ENOUGH THEN WHY IS IT THAT THERE IS ALOT OF INFO UP THERE?! SHE IS ONE OF THE MAIN SUPPORTING CHARACTERS WHICH MAKES HER VERY IMPORTANT (MORE THAN TEAM 8)! AGAIN FOCUS ON WHO YOU LIKE AND I'LL FOCUS ON WHAT I LIKE! Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 20:46, April 30, 2013 (UTC)Inoyamanaka98Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 20:46, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. I didn't mean to do that there but still WHY? Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 20:53, April 30, 2013 (UTC)Inoyamanaka98Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 20:53, April 30, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) I was not being rude.
 * 2) I explained to you already why it shouldn't be added yet you continue to do it.
 * 3) I don't dislike Hinata. I'm a very rare person you'll find that dislikes no character.
 * 4) I am now convinced that you're entirely sane.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 21:01, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

Look what I mean is that whatever I put you delete b/c its mostly about Ino and thats who your being rude to. I like and acknowledge Ino and it seems you don't so if you don't, why do you go to her page and read what is up there? And if she is not important then why is she a main supporting character and during the war it experienced her presents. And I didn't say you dislike Hinata. And in matter of fact I barely like her I like Ino better than her! I said you put "not important enough" which means they can put it up there again but when it comes to Ino you send me that first message she is not good enough! And another thing if you don't dislike her then why did you say she is not improtant enough and called her a scant and not worth acknowledeable.Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 21:14, April 30, 2013 (UTC)Inoyamanaka98Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 21:14, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Ino Yamanaka image
If you fix the license and rationale on File:Ino Shika Cho.jpg it can be used in articles. The other one is fine. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:24, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

Can you tell me how b/c I tried and don't know how to. Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 06:29, April 16, 2013 (UTC)Inoyamanaka98Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 06:29, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

You can copy the code from the hair trap image, paste it into the formation page, change the info like episode number, characters and such, then save. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:56, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

Ino's infobox
Jutsu can't be directly added to infoboxes. She is listed as using that technique already, but due to infobox bugs, it's not showing. Characters are added as users of techniques in the technique's articles, and then the character's infobox collects that information to list it. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:02, April 18, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Popularity Poll
No idea. As far as I know, that is done in Japan only. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 03:29, April 18, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Future Naruto Shippuden games
Probably, no idea when. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 03:50, April 18, 2013 (UTC)

Shipping
I couldn't care less about all of it. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 03:58, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

What do you mean about that? Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 04:23, April 22, 2013 (UTC)Inoyamanaka98Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 04:23, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

I mean that I'm indifferent to who ends up with who. I don't care if character X ends up with character Y or Z. I rather dislike shipping in general, because I feel that more often than not, shipping detracts from actually developing the plot. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 17:34, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Ino Yamanaka jutsu
I don't really think about that. As far as my involvement in this wiki goes, save for very specific exceptions, I don't really discuss what ifs and maybes. For me, and for a significant part of other regular editors, this wiki is a place to document the series, not to discuss it. We only discuss things as far as we have to in order to properly document who does what, when, where, why and how. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 17:34, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

I'm not talking about putting jutsu on the wiki. I'm talking about the anime I mean the way she is being treated and as far her jutsu goes its just not right. In the Ultimate Ninja Storm 3 she doesn't have anything new and I wish when there is a future game I want her to get something new like new mind-affecting techinques, flower-based attacks, and her fully combo attacks b/c in the Ultimate Ninja Storm 3, her combos are not like the Ultimate Ninja Storm 2, and Generations. I know you are not the type of person who discuss things what I'm saying is I really want her to be treated equally. Oh and PS: do you know how to message the creators of Naruto Shippuden games if so may you please tell me. Thank You! 76.5.188.135 (talk) 17:49, April 22, 2013 (UTC)Inoyamanaka9876.5.188.135 (talk) 17:49, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Like I said, I'm indifferent. They can't really add new mind-techniques to her in the games unless they make new ones up, because she hasn't show nothing new in the manga. The newest technique she has in the manga is the Mind Clone Switch Technique and that only showed up in a cinematic. Several characters in the games have out-dated move-sets. Jūgo has yet to show in his full transformation, despite already having shown it around the time UNS2 came out, for example. Edo Asuma is basically only a different skin, despite him showing a new technique in the manga. Edo Itachi is basically Itachi with a different ultimate, despite also displaying a new technique. No, I don't know how to contact the video game developers. You can probably look around in their site for a contact section or something similar I suppose. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 18:05, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thanks for your help. Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 18:11, April 22, 2013 (UTC)Inoyamanaka98Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 18:11, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Formation Ino—Shika—Chō
Why do you write to me about it?--LeafShinobi (talk) 11:20, April 25, 2013 (UTC)

Well I saw what you put up on the Formation Ino—Shika—Chō page so I thought you should know about it. Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 19:41, April 25, 2013 (UTC)Inoyamanaka98Inoyamanaka98 (talk) 19:41, April 25, 2013 (UTC)