Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-36019309-20190114073523/@comment-35409024-20190204041412

Jason wrote: Honestly i don't remember receiving such proof from you. Moving on, the word that fits the meaning you provided above is Immediately not immediate, but still i don't see how the above meaning translates to 0 seconds. Perhaps a little proof will shut me up?. And oh, while at it do take a look at the example they provided below on the meaning of 'immediately'..i really don't see how the meaning corresponds with the example, what ,is the girl in the meaning superhuman or somethinG? and exactly why you skipped past the first meaning and the many synonyms mentioned with it baffles me greatly.....i think you're substituting the idea at hand with a more exaggerated one, in this case you're using what seems a meaning that fits General Relativity(the study of space and time) to what? a jutsu? lol. I'm sure when kakashi mentioned moment he meant nothing close. Think about that and stop exaggerating the character statements. "No intervening time or space". That means there is no time that intervenes. Therefore there is no time. If there is no time then it's 0 seconds. I don't know what is so hard to understand about that. I'm not substituting anything. If you're referring to the argument on instant, you were the one saying it can't mean 0 seconds, i just merely proved you wrong. I could care less about your argument on instant since it's irrelevant to Tsukuyomi. Well this made me cringe. You keep hypothesising that maybe he improved in the future. Here you go:

The current Bee isn't the same Bee who fought Itachi years prior. Do you know if Bee is the same? Do you have a direct quote or a case from Kishimoto that says/or shows Bee is still clueless when it comes too Genjutsu? I never said I think he can. What I said is,is there any proof he hasn't changed. That still isn't proof of me saying Bee can fight Genjutsu. That's me asking you where's your proof he can't. I'm not the writer of the series. Posing limitations on a character not stated or shown is hyperbole. It isn't legit until it comes from the series. I believe in facts and facts alone. I don't care about how you feel or not. Until you start showing me proof he can't in Boruto, I won't say he can't. It's simple. Wiki Error: Your opponent has failed to reply on this sub topic due to the fact that you still misunderstand the meaning of instant, which by the way doesn't mean 0 seconds, he therefore requests that you provide proof of the word meaning exactly as you say it means. Meaning the proof provided should contain the following characters 0 seconds and not your own fancied interpretations of the word So basically you're saying it doesn't mean without any intervening time or space? Good to know you don't know what you're talking about. but me replying to them simply means that you'll reply to them as well. and that would mean that i would just have to be typing new pointless shitz. Like arguing over instant? Haha, the contradictory. But i'll take on this example of your's though>>>What's next, you going to say Itachi can use Kamehameha and tell me I gotta prove it wrong? Lol...this is literally you when stating that killer bee can possibly break genjutsu in the future and then asking me to prove that he can't. lol. False. Never stated that, so...