User talk:Omnibender

Re: Block
Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:10, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:17, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:01, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:31, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:59, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Boundary Barrier
I've tried translating those kanji before, but for some reason I cannot find them anywhere. The odd thing is, they don't look like they are simply gibberish... —ShounenSuki (talk 07:58, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Episode summaries
As you wish. --Ttogafer (talk) 16:52, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Siblings
Ok just trying to help out where I could

New chakra nature concepts
It seems that I was wrong and Kishi did decide to introduce three-elements combinations. I'm looking forward to your ideas on that, as this new introduction of Kekkei Tōta created more problems for all of us with theories. Also, Sand Release is also viable as a theory now, if Kishi decides to retcon that and elaborate on how it works. For some reason, it seems that Kishi is treating kekkei genkai as the same meaning as "advanced natures" these days, since we haven't seen anything like Shikotsumyaku for a long time. --GoDai (talk) 06:49, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Kekkei Tōta
Great minds do think alike ^^ That was one of the first thing that came to my mind when I first read of the kekkei tōta. It could explain a whole lot in this way, from the different Yōton users to the Fifth Mizukage's double elemental kekkei genkai. It also strongly hints at a kind of eugenics or genetic manipulation programme dating back to perhaps even before the villages were founded. —ShounenSuki (talk 01:16, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Let's just hope Kishimoto-sensei actually meant for this to explain all that... —ShounenSuki (talk 01:41, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Bird monster
My bad, I searched for it for a little to see if it existed already, but I couldn't find anything due to it not really having a name. By the way, do you think it should be called San's Hawk or Exploding-feathered Bird? ~ Fmakck - Talk - Contributions 04:09, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Never mind, San's Hawk sounds better. ~ Fmakck - Talk - Contributions 04:12, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Message 1/28/2011
There are some things I would like to add to some articles without getting into a "revert war".

1) Danzo does not refer to Sasuke's skill with Tsukuyomi, but rather, denounces the genjutsu he used in comparision with Tsukuyomi's capability.

2) The databook (3) frequently referred to the Mangekyo Sharingan (Susanoo, Kamui, and Uchiha clan translations) as the supreme dojutsu; I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be there even if it's contradictory.

3)According to the spoilers, "Enton" is merely the nature of Amaterasu, not the ability to shape them. The current article is misleading when in reality, Amaterasu is actually an Enton by itself. Randy Michael (talk) 04:18, January 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * it's unlikely Danzō would compare a simple genjutsu to Tsukuyomi.

That's exactly what he's doing: comparing an inferior genjutsu to a genjutsu known for manipulating the perception of time. A primary reason as to why he didn't use it lies in the idea of "transferred trauma" ergo when Tsukuyomi is broken or stopped the pain experienced in the illusion will briefy affect the target. Didn't quite happen aside from the cloud shinobi and bee.

As for Amaterasu, that basically seems to be outdated info [Retcon] or misconstrued info; you could look at "group" without the lireral sense. Databook II didn't refer to it as a fire release iirc. Sasuke referred to the Amaterasu he used on Gaara as Enton, which basically lends credence to the idea that merely shaping the flames doesn't denote the naming of a whole new release or that he's performing a nature transformation. http://www.narutoforums.com/showthread.php?p=25578733#post25578733

Randy Michael (talk) 03:11, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

"If Sasuke isn't as skilled as Itachi was, he would obviously not cause the same effects, nor would he suffer as much of the consequences."

I'm referring to the genjutsu's trauma still affecting the victim even if they broke it and causing a brief paralysis, as well as a pain in the casting eye. This is shown when Sasuke and bee broke it, and Itachi and Sasuke displayed distinct pain in their eye, but not when Danzo broke it ergo he wasn't using it.

"Sasuke only started to refer to Amaterasu as Blaze Release after he began using shape manipulation, and it was implied that a lot happened off-panel."

Look at what's actually happening on panel: you see Sasuke cast the jutsu with his left eye and his right isn't involved. Can you see any difference between the flames he used in Gaara despite referring to it as "Enton"? Was Sasuke said to have been performing nature transformation? As far as C is concerned, Sasuke wasn't turning the flames into a new element was he?

"And the Third Databook is more recent that the Second, and it was in the third that the entry of Transcription Seal: Amaterasu explicitly said that Amaterasu is a Fire Release."

If it says it's from the "fire release group" then it's either meant figuratively or a retcon. Randy Michael (talk) 01:14, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

Deletion tags
Unless it's offensive to the eyes or some other sensibility, please do not blank articles when tagging them for deletion. It wastes five seconds of my day while I look up an old version of the page. ~SnapperTo 22:54, January 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * Someone does it more often than that. Deva maybe? For future reference anyway. ~SnapperTo 23:12, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Gama-Chan
Hi there. Your edit of my information to Gama-chan was perhaps coded properly, albeit backwards. The writing in both the anime as well as the manga appears in the native hirigana where it is written as: なるとさいふ. To state "The strip roughly says Naruto's Wallet (なるとさいふ, Naruto Saifu)" would be backwards and therefore incorrect. If you'd like to suggest a reason why I'm incorrect in my way of putting it, please let me know. &#160;    - Daniel Peragine (talk) 10:49, January 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * This is wrong because what is WRITTEN on Gama-chan is the following: "なるとさいふ" which is pronounced as "Naruto Saifu", and means Naruto's Wallet. In your edit, you put that it says "Naruto's Wallet", when in fact (as stated above) it says "なるとさいふ" making, what you keep editing it to, incorrect.  It'd be like saying that the ramen bar that Naruto loves, which is called "楽ラ一メン", has a sign labeling it as Ichiraku Ramen, and the sign translates to: "楽ラ一メン" when in fact it is the opposite.   DANIEL &#160;talk&#160; 00:20, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

chapter articles
Not sure about this so i'll ask before i proceed...For the chapter articles that don't have chapter covers or colored pages. Is it ok if an image from the chapter is used? --Cerez365 (talk) 19:04, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Oh i see, alrighty then ^^ --Cerez365 (talk) 19:12, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Re:archives
Not that I know of. I still have the the archive button on my taps list so I'm not sure the problem. If you have FireFox and using the NoScript addon (which I doubt you are), be sure to allow everything on the page cause I do remember that happening to me once.--TheUltimate3 ~Aspect of Wiki ~ 03:02, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * I see it using monobook. S im A nt 03:19, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Databook 4
Since we get them every 3 years, shouldn't we have one out this year soon? On a side not, where will Kishi end it, right before the Fourth War?Umishiru (talk) 16:41, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Did you see my response on the More Ideas section?Umishiru (talk) 00:40, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

I can't edit
I want to help edit pages as well but they will not let me edit any pages can you please help me know why so that I can do what I can, I sent you this message because I see you always editing pages.

Blocking
I hardly think I should have been blocked for making an edit like that. I didn't see the users section below, so i added sasuke. 74.63.112.140 (talk) 23:05, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Shiki Fūjin trivia
It's a bit unclear what the Fourth means, exactly:

It's left up to interpretation whether he means it's the only fūinjutsu he can use because he's a jinchūriki, or if he can only use the fūinjutsu because he's not a jinchūriki. To me, it seems he is saying he can't use any other fūinjutsu but the Shiki Fūjin. It seems to be the most logical interpretation. Or I should say, it seems he's saying he cannot use any other fūinjutsu because he's isn't the Kyūbi's jinchūriki nor can he make himself one (because that would once again release the Kyūbi at some point).

Again, it's vague, but I don't think he's saying jinchūriki cannot use the Shiki Fūjin. —ShounenSuki (talk 09:35, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I forgot the 'not' there... —ShounenSuki (talk 00:37, February 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Then the info on the Trivia can be deleted?--JK88 (talk) 20:34, February 3, 2011 (UTC)