User talk:Simant

Re: Team Infobox
If you can do it in a way that doesn't cause existing queries to become a complex mess (or at least not any messier). Otherwise it's better to use another property. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Feb 12, 2010 @ 08:05 (UTC)


 * I was wondering, is it possible to somehow make a distinction between ad hoc, single-mission teams like the Sasuke Retrieval Team and more established teams like the genin teams? --ShounenSuki (talk 17:40, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I was thinking of a separate property row called team type, or something. --ShounenSuki (talk 18:18, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's a bit of a problem, actually. the team status property shouldn't be there. It's the same as using current or former, which we've been trying to get rid off as well. --ShounenSuki (talk 21:59, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * It might be a bit superfluous in terms of information, but I would personally like to be able to sort the teams on team type. --ShounenSuki (talk 22:13, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I haven't really thought about the exact terms yet. It will really depend on what exactly is considered a team, as opposed to a partnership or an organisation.
 * I could see values for genin team (e.g. Team Kakashi) and ad hoc teams (e.g. the Sasuke Retrieval Team), perhaps criminal gangs (e.g. the Magaki group) and specialised teams (e.g. Twelve Guardian Ninja and the various teams of the Nijū Shōtai). --ShounenSuki (talk 22:20, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

2 Things

 * 1) Might want to think about another archive. This is starting to get long.
 * 2) Color for the infoboxes. /shrug think they are stable enough to handle it? I dunno they are all grey and it seems kinda boring >.>. Like Green for Konoha, Beige for Suna, Purple for Oto, ect, ect.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 17:40, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I would say they people like him would have the color of their most recent affiliation. For example, Orochimaru would be purple, for Sound, while Sasuke would be...well...I think he would be gray for straight missing-nin...All members of Akatsuki would have Red...ect...ect...--TheUltimate3 (talk) 01:56, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I think it would be more logical to use their main affiliation; the village of which they have the symbol in their databook profile. Otogakure for Orochimaru, Konohagakure for Madara and Sasuke, Kirigakure for Suigetsu, etcetera. --ShounenSuki (talk 13:46, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * That make sense...But for some reason seeing Sasuke's affiliation be green for Konoha just seems...stupid. For some reason I have less of an issue with Madara's (though I still would like some sort of red or red/black for Akatsuki) being green...--TheUltimate3 (talk) 14:07, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * Affiliation is really that village that a character is most put into connection with. Sasuke is still thought off as a Konoha-nin, just like Madara is. I wouldn't find it odd at all to see him with a Konoha infobox. --ShounenSuki (talk 18:24, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * @Simant Understood. Don't worry about it if it's a problem. I'll figure something out once everything is stable and what not.
 * @ShounenSuki: It's more or less my strong anti-Sasuke sentiment. The fact that I can see the series true villain with the Konoha symbol, but not Sasuke is really because I see him as an asshat. >.>--TheUltimate3 (talk) 18:35, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Kanji Question
The Japanese equivalent of the comma is 、. If the normal commas don't work well and you dislike the Japanese commas, you could always just use a semicolon instead. --ShounenSuki (talk 13:53, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Possible bug
Not sure if this is a bug in the jutsu infobox or in the character infobox, but in Han's infobox, his only technique (Steam-based Ninjutsu) is listed three times. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:06, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps a problem at Steam-based Ninjutsu? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:40, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Rinnegan
Honestly the guys an idiot. Been gone so long I'm acting childish. *sigh*  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 03:06, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah I saw that but I didn't want to get rid of eerything so I had to do it the hard way.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 04:07, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Please stop making me feel bad about things I miss. Last time I tried to archive my talk page I blanked it and had to rollback everything. This was all back before that easy button. D: I waas putting it off until today hoping to get it right; which I did :D  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 04:12, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I know. Me and you still good right?  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 04:18, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Protect
Fixed. Jacce | Talk 06:30, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Episode - video links
Screw Crunchyroll >.> (Horribly biased. Used to be a user of Crunchyroll before they dumped all the anime and made ya have to pay.) All the episodes (official translations mind you) should be on Hulu. Though that may also cause problems (I think Dantman said something about it being regional or something) but I do know its free.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 19:30, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Delete
I tried. Jacce | Talk 05:46, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Stats infobox
Is it ok to protect the new infoboxes or is there something you want to fix on them? Jacce | Talk 19:51, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Protected. Jacce | Talk 06:52, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

just so ya know.
you edited my post, but just so ya know.... IT WASNT ME!!! i only edited the lower part, i think supersaiyaman did the part you fixed.--Shelldone (talk) 22:56, March 3, 2010 (UTC) sorry, upon further inspection. actually its not supersaiyaman.Shelldone (talk) 23:34, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me......
1. This is a Wikipedia page - hardly creditable or highly recognised. 2. What AN extremely... - If you’re going to offend and criticise a WIKIPEDIA contribution, do so with correct grammar. The irony there is unbearable. 3. "The fate of the two is currently unknown" - A simplistic sentence, yes, that illustrates how far the storyline has been extended. The initial cliff hanger and the last scene in which the reader is left with.

I don't care much for your tone in your description, finding you unbearably rude and ignorant. I repeat. If you’re going to insult someone, do it in the right manner - and subtly. Sanders-sama (talk) 23:11, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

P.S. "There aren't that many moments between being grabbed and being stabbed. I haven't read it and i can still see flaws... what a bad writer" --- Contribution not made by myself. F.Y.I


 * Sanders-sama, By you saying "the fate of the two is currently unknown" is suggesting they might be dead, Which isnt correct.  And i read simant's post, even though you deleted it and it wasnt rude or ignorant, he was correct and said it "subtle". Too much play by play is overkill. it just doesnt look nice when you state every single move.
 * And your spelling, if youre unsure of a how a word is spelled you could research it, you had so many mistakes.
 * and when youre editing multiple character pages, it would look better if you didnt copy and paste the same thing and add a few more details. try to make different structures.
 * And thats also why you mis-spelled alot, because you mis-spelled it the first time, then copied it, example you spelled "sasuke", "saskue" so many times.
 * And im saying this on Simants page because no-one will see it on yours, and you will probably delete it...--Shelldone (talk) 23:47, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Well I wasn't talking about what he wrote there - that is not the descirption box. The diction and language he used were far from passive. I did realise that I had spelt it wrong and agree that I talked too much in detail. (Oh and spelt not spelled.I'm a fan of irony) And your comment is directed at me, so why does everyone else need to see it? I deleted the content from my page as I don't like it untidy. But I fail to see how something directed at me has anything to do with anyone else. Also, we don't know what has happened between Sasuke and Naruto. "suggesting they might be dead. Which isnt correct" Isn't it? An explosion occured and it was left there. They MIGHT very well be dead or injured. The explosion could SUGGEST injury of some kind. - I never said death. Sanders-sama (talk) 23:59, March 3, 2010 (UTC)