Board Thread:Theories and Speculation/@comment-34656247-20180531072459/@comment-26636534-20180616130000

Drawingblank2014 wrote:

LegionZero is using hyperbole to highlight the fact that one cannot make an unsubstantiated assumption, and then try and use it to make a point as if it were a fact. That's not how debate works.

No, what @LegionZero is doing is using hyperbole to make light of the fact that Itachi was putting on an act and that everything he said can't be taken as the whole truth due to the facade. Even trying to play it off as an assumption. Not acceptable.

Drawingblank2014 wrote: If you're going to claim that he was lying, you need to bring a source to the table where his lie was confirmed in the material. Itachi's mission is the proof of the facade. That is the easiest thing to prove.

Drawingblank2014 wrote: Until then, you saying he was lying is no more factual or relevant than if I were to say that "Naruto was lying about not knowing Neji, Lee, or Tenten when they were introduced in the series." LoL, I see a pattern here. Using hyperbole doesn't help either of your points. Making irrelevant and pointless comparisons as well. All it does is distracts from the issue at hand, making the unimportant seem important. It is quite unfortunate that we can't have a debate on the real issue at hand.

Namely, What is proof that Tsukuyomi works on everyone and how is it proven? And, the validity of Itachi's words undercover. Anything else is just noise, noise that you and so many others love to go on and on about.

Even kudos each other for it, so yeah, waiting for the real debate one day.