User talk:Kiba91

The protection of Kiba's page has been removed. You should be abel to edit it now. Jacce 05:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I see, you can't edit because the page was protected. But, I think you talked to Jacce, right? Well, first things first, yes, I do like to talk. Second, I'm not a sysop (a.k.a. admin), and third, my time in this wikia is going to be pretty often now. So, yep! IF you need help, talk to Jacce, User Talk: TheUltimate3, or...me!. Greetings to this wikia as well! Hope you have fun! ^_^ --Rasengan888 (talk) (Narutopedia Editor) 20:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

P.S. You can also find me at the Naruto Fanon, for some reason, a bug has prevented from me to go to it. I'm fixing it though...hard to get it out though...

Wiiii! Thank you both!!! =D Thanks a lot!!! ^^ And sure i'll have fun, i like this wikia very much! hehe, and when i'll have a question or comment, now i know who i'm going to talk :)

Thanks again!! And to you too Jacce!!! :D and i will visit you at Naruto Fanon :) Thanks again and hope we can talk more :) --Kiba91 21:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:
I removed the information in the first place because most of it is useless; example: a paragraph-long description on an argument Kiba has with Sora that contributes nothing to the plot. You restored all of it because you feel Kiba needs eight pages of plot synopsis. If there is a specific part that I removed that you feel should be re-added, do so. ~SnapperTo 05:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I am removing useless information from other character articles (characters A → Ko completed). Kiba's article is the only one I've had problems with. I removed the line about him impressing Kakashi because it already says that in the Abilities section. I did not remove that he survived Pain's attack. I removed the line about him believing in Naruto because that has no impact on the plot. If you want explanations about other removals, feel free to ask.
 * Sorry if I sound disrespectful or rude, but I don't think "he's my favorite character!" is a good excuse to use on a wiki. ~SnapperTo 04:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Neji starts with N, which comes after K, so I haven't gotten to it yet.
 * If you'll look at Kiba's ability section, I am only combining two short sections into one. If you can somehow make either of the two sections longer, splitting them up again (as is done with Hinata's article) would be fine. Also, that Hinata is concerned for Naruto is relevant since she loves Naruto and is almost killed because of it. Kiba does not have that problem.
 * I asked you to restore specific parts if you felt they were important. You instead restored the entire second half of the article regardless of what changes I made earlier. Respecting each other's edits is a two-way street; when you restored who Kiba is teamed with and how he figures out he's being watched by bats, I had no problem with it. Now you can find something that I added (or removed) to not have a problem with. Pretty please? ~SnapperTo 05:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Hey
So what is your problem? Jacce 05:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Kiba Inuzuka
Kiba91, the Kiba Inuzuka page was protected because you were revert warring. Our policy is to lave an article at the previous state it was in when protecting due to a revert war, thus your latest edits were reverted.

You have not bothered to take discussion to a proper location. When an article is in dispute take discussion to the article's talk page and refrain from reverting other users. You have not bothered to take a proper community discussion to the talkpage, you have not bothered to communicate fully with other users (You haven't after Snapper2's most recent comment to you, you continued to revert war and made no response; And instead of talking to me, one involved, you sidestepped and went to the uninvolved Jacce), and you have not been civil or coherent with your comments.

Please take a civil community discussion to the Talk:Kiba Inuzuka page. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 2, 2009 @ 02:40 (UTC)


 * First revert is fine, revert is how we get rid of bad edits. Unreverting something is where the problem starts and revert wars break out because people don't discuss things. Snapper2 even made attempts to improve the article by only undoing parts of the edit and suggesting you put back small pieces, you responded by just completely reverting his compromise.
 * When more than one person is reverting you, it is even less reason to revert, it means you are one person going against multiple members of the community, that point should be a signal that you are in a minority and should be attempting to talk with all the people involved and taking a discussion to the talkpage where everyone can get involved. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 2, 2009 @ 03:55 (UTC)
 * Yes, two users aren't the entire community, but when one user is constantly revert warring with two others it's a signal that it is no longer a 1 vs. 1 argument and that 1 user is starting to push his opinion against those of multiple others. In 90% of the cases I see here where one user is reverting against multiple the end result is that the community decides the user was pushing his personal opinion.
 * Whatever the case is, the fact is you unreverted a revert without discussion. The moment an edit of yours is reverted you should be thinking "Something I did was undone, perhaps I should put my edit on hold and go to the article's talkpage to get a third opinion on the edit", not "I was reverted, I'll just unrevert it" that! is where a revert war starts. The revertee is the first person with a good chance to start a proper discussion, the reverter is normally not that person because a large number of the users a reverter ends up needing to revert are the ones that wont participate in a discussion, much less start one.
 * Article talkpages are for discussion on the article, that is where discussion should go (feel free to poke people involved to participate in the discussion). So take your arguments to Talk:Kiba Inuzuka where they can be discussed. Users will chime in, piles of people watch the rc, and our community portal even lists active talkpages, that's what's relevant. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 2, 2009 @ 04:38 (UTC)
 * Take a look at the history tab, you can use it to select a diff. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 2, 2009 @ 22:41 (UTC)
 * Right next to the edit button. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 3, 2009 @ 03:59 (UTC)

Re:Hi
Well the page was blocked because of you and Snappers Edit War. So eh. Not sure what to do there.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 22:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Ino Jutsu
I took em off becuz they're not real techniques and they've only been used once and not one of her primary jutsu AMTNinja (talk) 02:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Ki
Yeah, there was a brief lapse while I sorted that out. Kiho's image was named "Kigiri" and Kigiri's image was named "Nurari". I had to move one before I could move the other. It's been fixed. ~SnapperTo 04:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: New arc
Hi! I'm fine, hope you are to. I would say that Pain invasion arc is over, and we might need a new name for the next arc (we are using "post Pain invasion" now). The thing is just to come up with a name, something that would belong on the plots talk page. Jacce | Talk 05:03, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

RE: ...
I undid your edit because you made up a arc name, and instead of having som1 forget about it later, i reverted it so we could wait till we come to an agreement on all the articles to have the same arc name. Simant (talk) 01:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Utakata
Neither page should have said the two jinchūriki might have known each other. I removed then information from Yagura's page as well. --ShounenSuki (talk 18:55, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: New Image
I suggest you upload the image, ad and  templates, and places it on the article. If it is good we keep it, if it is bad it will be removed. Jacce | Talk 06:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC)