User talk:Cheopz19

Hello Cheopz19, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Dragon Life Reincarnation page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Jacce (Talk) 06:11, June 1, 2012

From me to you
Hello, Cheopz. I would like to say thank you for all of the additions you made to the the Bonds movie pages. Keep it up! KotoSenju (OldUser:JaZZBaND)-Talk-Contributions 18:42, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

Making so many unnamed techniques
Not that it is wrong, but wouldn't it be better to just a) already read the information that is provided, b) come up with more fitting names or c) list several techniques who do the exact same thing under the same page? Just suggesting, 'cause all of 'em unnamed techniques can and should be handled better.--Omojuze (talk) 12:03, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure thing:) I know that most of 'em are unnamed, but they have a lot of similarities and similar usages and it's not worth creating multiple articles for that. ;p--Omojuze (talk) 12:29, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

Infobox Form
I would suggest for you to use Form:Character and in the future instead using an old fashion way. I hope you understand and know how to use the character infobox from. Kunoichi101 (talk) 09:24, February 1, 2015 (UTC)

About Techniques articles from the Last movie
I noticed that you first created some articles from the Last movie. But as far as it is a movie and the plot takes place two years after the fourth war, those articles (for an example Puppet Reincarnation) are not in Shippūden anime or something as their first debut. Thus, they're movie only techniques or characters. I hope you understood this message after creating the articles from the specific movie in the future. Kunoichi101 (talk) 23:08, February 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * i'm glad you understood. although it's a movie, it's still canon, of course. Kunoichi101 (talk) 09:03, February 8, 2015 (UTC)