Talk:Gaara's Jinchūriki Forms

Sorry for undoing your undoing but
i added that extra information because the article is to small as it is, beside try to compare witht the Naruto Jinchuriki article, that is much bigger and stuffed with much more information on each form, even some historie about them.

but until you start undoing my undoing of your undoing, lets discuss it here first


 * I don't know why your edits were reverted, wait for TU3 for that. But I did see a number of spelling/grammar errors there (try a spellchecker or browser with one built in), and you were using present tense when you were supposed to be using past tense. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion May 22, 2008 @ 12:57 (UTC)
 * I reverted it because the edits were initially full of spelling/grammer issues, and what I thought was unneeded info (for example, I was trying to keep plot points out, merely stating when/why/or how a form was taken, not going into to detail such as your edit that Gaara got beaten up, desperate, then transformed, or when Naruto summoned Gamabunta.) Naruto's Jinchruki Forms article, as more information in it, simply because it appeared more than Gaara's and displayed more abilities.--TheUltimate3 14:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

No large chakra supply?
"Unlike the Nine-Tailed Demon Fox, Shukaku doesn't have an unnaturally large supply of chakra that Gaara can use."

Is that really the case? Gaara had enough chakra for several large fights, moving large amounts of sand, and transforming into Shukaku. While it's not as much as Kyuubi, it seems an unnaturally large supply to me. I Totally agree becuase Gaara fought Naruto to a stand still and only lost when taijutsu(which is not his forte) was used and even Kimimarro, who has a cursed mark, couldnt finish all Gaara's chakra for the remainder of their fight. Also, when battling Deidara, Gaara raised a huge amount of sand with such ease which proves his high levels of chakra.Also note what Kiba said in the Forest of Death about Gaara's chakra levels.

partial forms
Should not half Shukaku and miniature Shukaku forms be just in one section, pertial transformations ? --Elveonora (talk) 22:20, December 7, 2011 (UTC)

Bump --Elveonora (talk) 20:14, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

I believe that Gaara's forms qualify as partial transformations. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:00, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

Me too, thats why i made this. It could also save up space. --Elveonora (talk) 02:53, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

I actually like the way it is now since half Shukaku and miniature Shukaku forms are like other jinchuriki's forms. Plus, he's only been shown using wind release while in his miniature Shukaku to full Shukaku forms, not his half Shukaku form. Joshbl56 04:13, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

So when will it be changed? 119.154.20.135 (talk) 10:38, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Bump 119.154.20.135 (talk)

I know, but other hosts were updated and half and miniature sounds weird, should be named just partial transformation. --Elveonora (talk) 16:00, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

So will it be changed to partial transformation or not? 119.154.5.35 (talk) 16:09, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

It probably will but lets wait and see what others have to say first. Joshbl56 17:17, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Josh, there are more contributors than the 3 of us. Not even Omni changes something without discussing it first, and he is an admin. --Elveonora (talk) 17:24, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

So what do we do? 119.154.8.17 (talk) 17:26, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

The same thing we do every time contributor- Try to get more peoples opinions on the matter! Joshbl56 18:31, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

The only thing that would bother me personally about naming this a Partial Transformation is that because of B, Partial Transformation has (for me at least) come to mean manifesting a part of the beast while still in control in human form. While this mostly matches up with that, it just bugs me a little. If the rest of y'all wish to change it, be my guest. Just thought I'd speak up. o3o Skitts (talk) 21:12, December 10, 2011 (UTC)