Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-1514283-20140911040828/@comment-1514283-20140912220855

Elveonora wrote: Sure, but only for Kaguya and we may argue Hagoromo. If you insist on adding Naruto, Obito and Madara, then you might as well change their Lava Release etc. from Tailed Beast Skill to kekkei genkai.

The Kekkei in Kekkei Mōra is questionable. It's a similar issue to that of all users of Mokuton through Hashirama's DNA being listed with it as a KKG. They did not obtain it genetically, nor do we know whether it would be passed down genetically, and yet we came to the decision to list them as KKG as well as their nature types. The fact TSB is called a Kekkei Mōra would indicate it's permanent. Does that make it genetic, does it pass down the bloodline, will it disappear for ever if the bijū are lost? Obito surely seems to make us think no since he retained his powers post extraction.

Perhaps you're right, perhaps we should apply the same logic. If we believe the powers of the bijū together make up a Kekkei Mōra, then maybe we should list those individual abilities as Kekkei Genkai. Or perhaps there are reasons not to.

What do we do know is that listing Kekkei Mōra in the infoboxes of characters that possess it and whether bijū abilities are KKG needs are only tangentially related. I believe that is a separate argument that needs to be judged by its own merits, not that of another because, while we are told explicitly TSB is a Kekkei Mōra, we have not been told the same of the KKG nature types utilised by jinchūriki. Logic and evidence will have to decide that score. This one, thankfully, has been resolved for us by the manga.