Board Thread:Narutopedia Collaboration/@comment-17623-20140206165340/@comment-1512913-20140608112342

Considering writing down only what was said equals an approach without bias, that's a positive thing. On another hand, ignoring something obvious and waiting for us to be spoon-fed ain't good, because we purposely ignore information until further clarified. But connecting the dots has a negative side to it as well, like different individuals interpreting it differently and then arguments like the eye come to be. And that's not what the wiki should be about.... it should be: "what author said" rather than us arguing with each other who is right and wrong.

(Don't kill me Ulti, it's just an example of the problem) take the eye: If we write down "Kaguya has power of Sharingan" but list only Rinnegan, because that's what the eye is, then Foxie would jump in with: "there's no cryptic message behind it, power of Sharingan = Sharingan" yada yada ignoring the fact that Sharingan devolved from the Rinnegan, so the Shinju, Kaguya and so can't have something that came to be later.

But if approach number #1 means removal of Sharingan from Kaguya's infobox then I'm all for it :P