User talk:QuakingStar

Hello ItachiWasAHero, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Talk:Itachi Uchiha page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Snapper2 (Talk) 06:13, April 30, 2011

About creating articles
Hey I'm not the one who do that! It's Kurenaisarutobi. Check her Special:Contributions/Kurenaisarutobi. What I do on the page is to tag it for deletion. And please create a new section because I'm having a hard time to find it! Ilnarutoanime (Talk-Contribs.-Images) 08:38, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Stop making archives and posting to the main page.
Hey before you post a complain. PLEASE CHECK THE RECENT WIKI ACTIVITY! >_<!!! --Ilnarutoanime (Talk-Contribs.-Images) 08:42, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

I report it to an admin, that user will be blocked.

Sorry, I misread who the post-ers were. But thank you for reporting her and tagging her posts for deletion. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 08:59, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

That's alright! Next time use the History page. She is underage maybe she don't understand such things. She's blocked until she become 13, (2015) by an admin. --Ilnarutoanime26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) 10:46, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

RE. Fact changing
We don't know if they're facts or not.--NaruHina fan (talk) 21:38, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

He became a chunin at 10, half a year later he became an Anbu, Half a year after that he killed Shisui and gained the Mangekyo Sharingan, which makes him 11, then The third managed to postpone his S-rank Massacre Mission for a few years, He then becomes an Anbu Captain at 13, sometime immediately following that he kills his clan then flees Konoha. So it is a fact. It has been talked about and agreed upon ItachiWasAHero (talk) 21:45, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Gaara, Temari and Kankuro
Try to check it here, although this is very long. --NejiLoverr26 (Ilnarutoanime) 11:34, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Does ShounenSuki actually own the real databook? Because if he relied off of the online scans whether they seemed raw or not then he got one thing wrong, Temari is 158.3 cm in Databook 2.
 * Please put your reply to the user's talkapage so they will notified. --NejiLoverr26 12:22, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re: I have a question for you
I own the actual databooks. There is no doubt that Temari was 159.3cm when she was 16. I could even show you a high-quality scan if you'd like. —ShounenSuki (talk 23:15, June 1, 2011 (UTC)

Please do. I hate when I have no way to prove something or have something proven to me. Thank you. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 23:52, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Here are her second databook stats ^^ —ShounenSuki (talk 00:06, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you ShounenSuki, One more thing I need cleared up is Shino's Databook 2 Height, I'm almost positive this wiki has it right, but I saw a databook 2 scan online and I dont know if it was tampered with but it claims, from what i remember, that he was 161.3 cm at 13. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 00:10, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

I hate to bother you, but on Shizune, Jiraiya, Sakura, and Tsunade's databook entrys are the heights they are given with their tall sandals on or without the tall sandals? ItachiWasAHero (talk) 00:16, June 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Here are Shino's second databook stats. As for your second question: I'm pretty sure it's their normal height, without any shoe ware and such taken into account. —ShounenSuki (talk 00:21, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks very much, Now I know this wiki's data is pretty much absolute. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 00:39, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

Re: On Your Character Particulars
No, that was a mistake. The Japanese actually had the correct info ^^ I fixed it now. —ShounenSuki (talk 11:42, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Oh ok, I was just checking, thanks. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 19:01, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Ages
Are there a source for the ages you have added lately? Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:13, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

To tentens page and the such and so on? The Hero Book states quite a few people a number age younger than databook 3 states them, so its easy to see they were all younger until 6 months later when they were all a number age older and sasuke betrays orochimaru and such. So common sense, tells you, if sakura, was 15, temari was 18, kankuro was 17, and naruto and gaara were 15 and kakashi was 29 then its safe to say everybody was all younger, until sasuke vs orochimaru, remember it is a tad over 6 months from the beginning of shippuden to the day sasuke betrays orochimaru. So it is a FACT that everyone was younger, for example narutos age group was 15 and a half when shippuden started, neji's age group was 16 and a half. So I am right that they were all younger in the beginning of shippuden. Chek there number ages and birth months and days then check what I just said, you will see i am generally right. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 07:08, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Also the manga states "about 2 and a half years" and then after that they just simplify it to 2 years for awhile so its actually a bit less than 2 and a half years but almost 2 and a half years after part 1 of Naruto, and at the end of part one of naruto, naruto's age group was 13. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 07:23, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Talkpage
Please don't use the Talk page of Narutopedia's home page, for things unrelated to the home page. S im A nt 18:50, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, please put your sign at the end of your message. --Ilnarutoanime 11:18, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

ItachiWasAHero (talk) 13:39, July 24, 2011 (UTC) That issue has already been brought to light, and I wasn't signed in when I made that response. Thanks anyway.

Re: I just confirmed something interesting.
Your reasoning is sound, but I still cannot simply agree with you. The dates and times stated in the manga are simply not definite enough to be this exact. You're taking the statements of 'three years' for Orochimaru's body transfer, 'two and a half years' for the time skip, and 'half a year' for Sai's statement as exactly that long, but it could easily be 'three years and 2 months', 'two years and five months', and 'seven months'. None of the statements are necessarily exact. —ShounenSuki (talk 20:03, September 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * The one thing it does confirm is that every character in Shippuden was younger then they were in Databook 3 until around the time Sasuke betrays Orochimaru. Also, your right there is no exact timeline which is why its safe to make the timeline go by years only, besides births and confirmed events by month there should be no other month listings in the timeline, although I think that's already how you have it. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 22:44, September 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * We knew this already, thanks to the Hero Book. Sure, we didn't exactly know when the turning point of their ages was, but because of the impreciseness of this time line, we still really don't know that. —ShounenSuki (talk 01:33, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Very True. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 19:40, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Height listings for some characters from Shippuden Character Reference's
You might want to make a forum for this to see how the other editors feel about including those numbers. As they're from the anime, they're already not canon, but even within anime continuity they might not necessarily be canon, given that they're merely character sheets. They're meant to give a rough indication of how a character should be drawn, not to give background details on the character. —ShounenSuki (talk 20:06, September 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * I believe Sakura's extra centimeter in height because of her shoes should just be noted in her appearance section and the only other heights that should even be considered for addition to the wiki is Hiruko, Moegi, Udon, and Matsuri's as Kisame's height is contradicted by Databook 3's height listing. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 22:49, September 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * The thickness of the soles Sakura's shoes is really rather pointless, especially since they aren't all that unusually thick.
 * As for the heights, the fact that there are contradictions in the first place means the data is unreliable. It's made even more unreliable because we don't have any actual images for most of the heights. I really don't think we can use this information as any more than trivia points. —ShounenSuki (talk 01:31, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Agreed ItachiWasAHero (talk) 19:39, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Confusing
I'd love to translate those sentences for you, but I'd have to know where you got them from in the first place. Are they from the third databook or something? —ShounenSuki (talk 14:50, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

Yes sir, on the part where it shows the evolution in stats for Naruto, Sakura, and Sasuke. I don't know what page it is but its the page that shows the increases in the stats between the end of Part 1 Volume 27 and by the end of part 2, Volume 43. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 19:59, September 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * There, I finished translated the entire article. you can find it here ^^ —ShounenSuki (talk 12:27, September 19, 2011 (UTC)

Ahh, so it says that those are his stats right before the Mangekyo was unlocked. Thanks ShounenSuki. Your work is greatly appreciated. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 17:22, September 19, 2011 (UTC)

Manga site.
Earlier I read you had wrote somewhere, possibly the Mizukages page, asking for another place to read manga aside from the popular Mangastream.

http://www.mangareader.net

This is another good site :)

Hope it helps if you still needed it.

SusanooUnleashed (talk) 14:45, September 22, 2011 (UTC)

Re: I hope I'm not being a pest.
I remember it being said that Sasuke's Sharingan had more potential than Itachi's, but that's about it. I remember Neji being called a genius, but that's about it. You'll have to give me some sources for those statements if you want a good answer. —ShounenSuki (talk 19:08, September 23, 2011 (UTC)

For Neji:

Chapter 79, Page 16. Chapter 80, Page 4. Chapter 99, Page 19. Chapter 101, Page 8, 12. Chapter 103, Page 4.

ItachiWasAHero (talk) 19:58, September 23, 2011 (UTC)

Zetsu explained Sasuke was more skilled with the sharingan when he defeated Tsukuyomi with only his 3 tomoe seal sharingan and we already know Itachi, then Orochimaru, then Madara in order, have said that sasuke's eyes have more potential then Itachi. So more skill than itachi with the sharingan, plus more potential than Itachi with the sharingan, plus countering his every genjutsu and seeing through every jutsu he used, and his eyes were compared to Madara's at only the age of 15 makes me think Sasuke is the Peak Uchiha. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 03:07, September 24, 2011 (UTC)

Re: I have a question.
I don't have all my full-chapter translations posted together somewhere. I've done way too few of them for that with way too much time between them. —ShounenSuki (talk 19:10, September 23, 2011 (UTC)

RAWs
I want them, too. Could you upload them somewhere or send me the links u used? Seelentau 愛議 13:51, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

I got them from here, all of them in raw. I used 7zip to get them extracted.

http://naruto-shinobi-world.deviantart.com/blog/43653643/

Have a good day, and for the First Animation book I will need your email. Until I find out how to upload it to Megaupload. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 18:24, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * ah, thank you very much! :D I think you need an account for uploading on megaupload... Seelentau 愛議 08:23, October 17, 2011 (UTC)

Heres the link I just made http://www.megaupload.com/?d=YDI6VB20 ItachiWasAHero (talk) 19:07, October 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry I haven't replied sooner, I hadn't had the time to look over those raws yet. Unfortunately I seem to already have everything useful from that list. Thanks any way. —ShounenSuki (talk 10:10, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

Oh ok cool. But wait.. So you have the HeroBook in raw already? I thought you told me once you needed it to fully translate it as it had never been fully translated before? ItachiWasAHero (talk) 20:18, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

Stop
Please quit adding your speculative Rinnegan statements to the articles. It is currently unknown and we'll wait for an official statement in the manga. Thank you. Skitts (talk) 03:44, October 27, 2011 (UTC)

I will. Your welcome. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 03:45, October 27, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Nagato's title
Why would it need to be untranslated? We translate it for the original, after all. —ShounenSuki (talk 15:41, November 6, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I know, I don't know what I was thinking. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 20:02, November 9, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Hmm
While I'm not into speculations/theories that much. I believe it could simply be chalked up to Orochimaru being seriously angered after being passed over for the Hokage-ship. Not too sure if he had a vision for the village, or even wanted to be a part of it after he was "wronged". As such destroying the village, would allow him and Danzō to both get what they wanted- two birds, one stone. Though it's not add worthy as it's just speculation.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 02:40, April 25, 2012 (UTC)


 * I sincerely doubt Orochimaru has ever been loyal to anything or anyone other than himself. He doesn't want the same Konoha as Danzō, he just wants destruction and chaos. —ShounenSuki (talk 14:57, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, I see. Thanks guys. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 01:59, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

re:math
Except you know movies shouldn't be taken for reference, they aren't canon. Also it takes a whole year to pass a class at least. Databook says Kakashi graduated the academy at 5 so he had to attend it since 4. Another reason why your "almost" approach doesn't work is because we do not know the exact month of year when the opening ceremony takes place nor when a school year ends. For example if it starts/ends even a day before his x birthday, he would be 1 year younger, if on the same day as his birthday or later, he would be 1 year older. Also you can't use real-life time as a reference for your calculations either, figure it's May in here but January in Narutoverse? Could you please provide your approach for calculations? I don't see much logic in it, no offense, perhaps enlighten me please. We should use Narutoverse events for reference. Right, Kakashi was already 14 when Naruto was born. The war had ended circa a year before that event and Itachi was 4 then while 5 when Obito attacked. So Naruto's birth marks circa 5 years after Kakashi Gaiden and Obito was 13 when crushed by boulders. This means it can't be 2 years and 7 months because during some months of the year, there's 4 year difference between them, wouldn't be possible with your math.--Elveonora (talk) 10:43, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

So are you suggesting Kakashi graduated in a year but Rin and Obito didn't? They were shown entering the academy together and taking chunin exams too. I still don't understand, excuse me. Could you please write it up as a timeline? Like "x even x character age" etc. Thank you. I'm not saying you are wrong and me correct, but again this is the way I see it. Kakashi graduated from Academy at 5 and became Chunin at 6 while taking the same exams as Obito and Rin, meaning they must have graduated with him too while being 4 years older. Obito and likely Rin too failed the exams once as 10 years old (when Kakashi was 6 and succeed) but managed to do it a year later (Kakashi 7) Then Obito "died" at 13 meaning Kakashi was 9. Sorry for repeating myself--Elveonora (talk) 20:28, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

Your math works, but the numbers are wrong, according to it, Kakashi had to wait 3 times for the two of them to catch up, you know that it's just wrong, right? 10-months let's say (an academy year) for them to graduate, then they failed Chunin Exams at 9 when he was 6, also had to fail at 10 when he was 7 and managed to do it at 11 when he was 8. The problem is, nothing in manga suggests him waiting for his classmates and shows Obito failing Chunin Exams only once, not twice. Obito had to be 13 years and 5 months old for Kakashi to turn 11 during the war, that's also ok. Except he is 3 years 7 months older, you are somehow loosing a whole year somewhere.

Let's see, we can use an Academy year having 10 months but works with 12 too when their ages are altered accordingly:
 * Kakashi 5 years 0 months, Obito 8 years 7 months (academy entrance)
 * Kakashi still 5 years but 10 months graduates.
 * Obito is 9 years 5 months old, also graduates with him.
 * Months later, Chunin Exams.
 * Kakashi at 6 years 5 months old becomes Chunin, Obito at 10 fails.
 * Kakashi 7 years 5 months, Obito 11 Chunin succeeds.
 * Kakashi 9 years 5 months old becomes Jounin, Obito "dies" at 13.

I still don't see how are you getting 2 years 7 months but ok--Elveonora (talk) 11:24, May 17, 2013 (UTC)

If you think so.--Elveonora (talk) 19:33, May 17, 2013 (UTC)

The fact that there are 2 exams per a year is completely irrelevant, it actually supports him being 9 even more but ok. The chapter shouldn't be referenced much since it's full of errors. Anko is 27 years old and she graduated Academy at 10, yet she was at Chunin Exams when Kakashi was 6, thus she herself being about 3? 0_0 Another thing is Hayate shouldn't ABSOLUTELY have been there--Elveonora (talk) 10:15, May 19, 2013 (UTC)

Current time Anko is 28 and Hayate would of been 27. Naruto went from 12 in Databook 1 to 16 in databook 3, no reason why Anko wouldn't age 4 years now right... meaning she is only 2 years younger than Kakashi, and Hayate is only 3 years younger than Kakashi. Either way those 2 being in chapter 599 is an error for sure, so is Minato's Stone face. But that is where the errors END in that chapter, the rest fits in right, and works with the proof I presented ItachiWasAHero (talk) 11:37, May 19, 2013 (UTC)

A non-canon movie that Kishimoto had nothing to do with isn't much in favor of your evidence, the databooks make it clear there's 3 years 7 months difference, thus 5 months in a year, Obito is 4 years older than Kakashi is.--Elveonora (talk) 11:52, May 19, 2013 (UTC)

My age is irrelevant, but perhaps since you are such an expert at deciding how old characters are, try to calculate that one as well. The reason why I deleted it is because that topic doesn't belong here. Not only you are presenting something as fact without enough evidence, you are making a forum topic of it, no one is interested, are you not getting it? Even Seelentau told you that you are wrong, do you need more people to tell you that so you get it? First, again explain from where are you getting 2 years 7 months, I have already presented to you that it's wrong because it doesn't fit at all.--Elveonora (talk) 21:25, May 19, 2013 (UTC)

The age stuff again
I explained it for you and everyone else here. Seelentau 愛議 01:32, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Bingo! you are a wise folk after all ItachiHero, that was the point all along, looking at databooks there's over 3 (almost 4) years difference, it's pointless trying to explain chapter 599 since it's flawed, I bet the author himself doesn't have an answer for that ._. --Elveonora (talk) 11:22, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Yes but it is as I said, we cannot add or change anything until Databook 4 confirms anything. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 19:05, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

There's no reason to do a timeline related to Obito anymore, with all current information he is 33-34, it matters not in what month the exams took place, it matters more which month it is currently in Naruto, rather.--Elveonora (talk) 12:40, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

The only info that supports Obito being 33-34 is the grad age numbers, but ONLY if you look at those alone. That's it. Chapter 599 and the Databooks Registration Numbers and Number Ages, combined with Grad Ages support Obito being 32-33 current time, I just don't understand why you don't see that Elve.. it's a mystery to me. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 15:33, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

No, I'm certain Suki Sensei would have told you the same thing. We simply don't know if chap. 599 is a retcon or errors, if the former, then possibly the grad. and prom. ages or even how old characters are may have been retconned, thus it isn't safe to base any evidence on that.--Elveonora (talk) 15:54, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Only the face was fixed, Hayate and Anko stayed, and THAT'S why we don't know if it's a retcon or he mistook again and hasn't noticed those 2 "errors" or if he did it purposely and it's a retcon. That's why for what we know, next Databook may change Kakashi's Chunin age to 10--Elveonora (talk) 16:08, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Also as you can see, there are more inconsistencies than Hayate as Anko, Ebisu, Genma, Ibiki, Guy, Kurenai. So please, stop spamming the wikia with these topics, I'm not saying you are wrong so don't be angry. Be mature, I bet you are intelligent enough so it should show, hopefully you won't continue in this behavior. I'm not saying your evidence and math are flawed, cause you did them right, it's because they are based on questionable material. The former material that WORKS should do for now. It matters not if you find a girl having crush on 9 years old buy stupid/weird or not, THAT IS a bias my dear ;D--Elveonora (talk) 16:19, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Now that I understand what you mean, that you understand my argument I won't need to post anymore about that. Now we are just waiting for databook 4. You know what else hasn't shown up yet? Shippuden OST 3. What the hell is going on. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 16:27, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, both Kishi and anime composers are late. But on topic, I thought I have made it clear enough already that I understand what you are talking about. That's why I'm surprised you are still going around with this. I remember you admitting "yeah, we wait for databook 4" many times before already, yet you have brought this up again and again nevertheless.--Elveonora (talk) 16:33, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah my bad on that, I sometimes forget it was already discussed and go at it again, then I go back and see the posts and feel like a douche ItachiWasAHero (talk) 06:31, May 26, 2013 (UTC)

Re: I need your help
To be honest, I could not care less about this age issue. Databook says he was nine, we mention nine in his article; it's as simple as that to me. What I have an issue with is you changing the information in the article based on your assumption. Please do not do that, find some other medium such as a talkpage to add it. I'm assuming that the user you mentioned, removed the information because it looked like speculation/forum-like content.--Cerez 365 ™(talk) 14:15, May 20, 2013 (UTC)