Talk:Boruto: Naruto Next Generations

Image
Shall we use the image from the announcement page for the article? Norleon (talk) 11:39, December 19, 2015 (UTC)
 * Why not? But I prefer the issue cover of WSJ that will contain the first chapter of this series (if released of course). Until that time, we can use this image. — Shakhmoot Nadeshiko Village Symbol.svg (Talk) 13:44, December 19, 2015 (UTC)

Chapter references
Okay. So at one point, a few users felt there was no need to specify the name of the manga we were referencing, because at the time, it was blatantly obvious that we were referring to the Naruto manga, as there weren't multiple manga series to document at the time. However, with this new Boruto manga, I would guess that the need to specify which manga series we are referencing is indeed important now, right? None of us anticipated there would be another series that continued the Naruto manga. Over a year ago, I had edited hundreds of articles to make the change. I am willing to change those back (or request the usage of a bot, whichever is wanted, though the bot does not get everything) for the upcoming monthly manga series. I would think using "Chapter 0, page 0" and "Boruto chapter 0, page 0" would be confusing without using "Naruto chapter 0, page 0" to specify the former. But I must ask first: Does anyone think this change is necessary for the upcoming series? Or no? 23:14, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * It would make sense to do this. Munchvtec (talk) 23:17, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * I was discussing that very thing with a few users on chat. Which is also why I stooped making redirects for the Naruto manga as I najed them "Chapter ?" because like you said. We didn't anticipate a new manga series. Of course I'll need to rename them "Naruto chapter ?". To answer your concern, I agree that referencing pages "Boruto chapter ?" and "Naruto chapter ?" is what we should do. However, I don't think a bot is necessary. There are plenty of users to helo out on this change. --Rai 水 (talk) 23:24, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
 * Seeing how this discussion is now in the forum, it makes this one redundant. Makes things inconvenient for me, but whatever. Do as you please. 06:59, March 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * Soooo, are we decided on this yet? :x 00:34, March 26, 2016 (UTC)
 * We don't know how the chapters will be numbered. If it starts with chapter 7+11 or 711, the change seems unnecessary, but if not, i support the change. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 06:12, March 26, 2016 (UTC)

Reboot
So now that first chapter of the Boruto series is out and its chapters don't continue from 700+10, we can start making the changes to references - changing "Chapter ?" to "Naruto chapter ?". My question is, should we, when referubg the Boruto series, put "Boruto chapter ?" or "Boruto: Naruto Next Generations chapter ?". --Rai 水 (talk) 20:57, May 4, 2016 (UTC)

Canoncity
If supervised by Kishimoto, would it be canon?Cloudtheavenger (talk) 02:11, May 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * "The series serves as an official continuation of the Naruto franchise". --Sarutobii2 (talk) 02:21, May 19, 2016 (UTC)

Chapter release dates
Should we start including the Japanese & English release dates of the chapters in there infoboxes, like we do for anime episodes & volumes? It would be more informative imo. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 18:33, June 11, 2016 (UTC)

Anime article
So, isn't there an article for neither Denki, the character introduced in the first anime episode of Boruto, neither an article for the episode itself. HygorBohmHubner (talk) 21:51, April 6, 2017
 * I usually create the episode articles, but I don't believe the infoboxes have been updated to understand there are two anime series now. If I filled out all the appropriate fields, stuff would get a bit wonky. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 04:11, April 7, 2017 (UTC)

So, what you're saying, there won't be no Boruto anime episode articles? HygorBohmHubner - Talk
 * There certainly will be. I'm just saying that as things are now, they'd have to be created without filling certain infobox parameters, or without infoboxes at all until they can be adjusted. I asked about them in the thread about the episode, but no one really noticed. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 04:34, April 7, 2017 (UTC)

Novel
Novel Version?. --Sharingan91 (talk) 15:05, April 26, 2017 (UTC)

5 years
Where was it said that the anime takes place 5 years before the manga? There's no source.Yahyanime (talk) 21:24, April 27, 2017 (UTC)
 * Boruto episode 2 says it has been 10 years since the world war, and the Boruto movie which the manga starts off with is said to be 15 years after the war. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 21:29, April 27, 2017 (UTC)
 * ...although I don't give a rat's ass about Naruto anymore, I maaaaybe should watch the anime, for the sake of my timeline... are there any more dates or anything? • Seelentau 愛 議 21:52, April 27, 2017 (UTC)

Novel "titles"
Just in case someone wants to create articles for the novels, here are their titles or... well, what is said above the "Novel 1/2" on the cover: • Seelentau 愛 議 13:34, June 10, 2017 (UTC)
 * Novel 1:
 * Novel 2:
 * In the moment, I've added titles on this page. --Sharingan91 (talk) 17:28, June 10, 2017 (UTC)

Vol 73 + Question
The Scarlet Spring arc is finally getting animated. Now, my question is: It says, "Ghost Incident arc" so do we have an official name for the second arc in the Boruto manga? --KiumaruHamachi (talk) 18:42, July 8, 2017 (UTC)KiumaruHamachi
 * Currently there's no name for the current manga arc, though given the plot it should be renamed to "Mujina Bandits Arc" if it doesn't receive an official name. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 20:11, July 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * He obviously meant the anime... :)--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 23:21, July 8, 2017 (UTC)


 * @Sarutobii2: I agree, we should call it that name. @BerserkerPhantom: Yes, sorry, I meant the anime. I should have clarified. Thank you for the clarification. In any case, yes, I am referring to the anime. --KiumaruHamachi (talk) 23:44, July 8, 2017 (UTC)Kiumaruhamachi

Novel 1
On this page we have it called "The New Leaves Soaring Through the Blue Sky!", so why is it in the novel debut section in the infobox is it called "The New Konoha Ninja Flying In the Blue Sky!"? --Rai 水 (talk) 04:36, March 20, 2018 (UTC)
 * Bump --Rai 水 (talk) 19:01, March 21, 2018 (UTC)
 * Because nobody updated the debut section since August 2017, I suppose. • Seelentau 愛 議 20:03, March 21, 2018 (UTC)
 * So is the official name the latter than? If so, I'll get to changing it and the redirect. --Rai 水 (talk) 20:06, March 21, 2018 (UTC)
 * No, the one in this article. • Seelentau 愛 議 20:33, March 21, 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok. So to be clear, it is called "The New Konoha Ninja Flying In the Blue Sky!"? --Rai 水 (talk) 20:35, March 21, 2018 (UTC)
 * ... • Seelentau 愛 議 20:41, March 21, 2018 (UTC)

Did you misunderstand what I was asking? --Rai 水 (talk) 20:55, March 21, 2018 (UTC)
 * No. • Seelentau 愛 議 21:16, March 21, 2018 (UTC)
 * So what was the "..." for? I know I used latter, but I was talking about the name used on this page. If it is called the latter, than the infoboxes need to be updated. If not, the name on this page needs to be changed. --Rai 水 (talk) 21:22, March 21, 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think you know what "latter" means. • Seelentau 愛 議 22:35, March 21, 2018 (UTC)
 * Why are you avoiding my question with snarky remarks for? Either you can help me or you can't. Like I said there are two different names. If you know what the name really is, then make the edit(s) please. --Rai 水 (talk) 02:49, March 22, 2018 (UTC)

To clear things up, he did answer your question: "On this page we have it called 'The New Leaves Soaring Through the Blue Sky!'..." "So is the official name the latter than? If so, I'll get to changing it and the redirect." "No, the one in this article." "This page" = "This article" = "The New Leaves Soaring Through the Blue Sky!" is what he was referring to as the correct translation. So not "The New Konoha Ninja Flying In the Blue Sky!". 04:10, March 22, 2018 (UTC)