Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20150609103822/@comment-24142271-20150609171306

AsianReaper wrote: Idk, the idea of someone who's supposed to be a leader around here who doesn't do his job doesn't sit well with me.

I feel like that's a manager just leaving for a couple years then coming back thinking he still should have rights. I know that we have Dantman and the sysops and whatnot, but it's just the principle for me.

Seems a little extreme given that this is a wiki, not a job with a corporation or something (basically if this wiki crashes and burns, we don't suffer reprucussions like financial issues). But I like to apply my principles to everything I see and do.

Leaders who don't do their job should not hold the position. Us who opposed want the status to stay because it'll let people know that he was a crat or admin or whatever he may have been. Not that they have any actual power at the moment. If they are to return then something should be done.