User talk:Hakinu

Re: Imuguz
Aite.....and about the poor quality images thing.....i hav evrythin in the anime covered...not the manga....just thought i'd let u know...AlienGamer | Talk 17:35, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Huh....But i saw them in the Poor quality list a few days bak....and started downloadin the epi's to replace them...i didn't know that u replaced them allready......AlienGamer | Talk 17:31, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

New Jobs 2
Since you asked, there's stuff that my stupid self has chosen to put off: You are entitled to disagree with me, but ideally another image would be found to address the issues with the "to replace" images. ~SnapperTo 19:47, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Sandayuu.jpg added to Sandayu Asama
 * Get rid of either File:3sannin.jpg or File:Team Hiruzen.jpg
 * File:Shigure.jpg to replace File:Shigure .JPG so there's nothing blocking his face
 * File:Sumaru 2.JPG to replace File:Sumaru4.JPG so there's no weird, indirect image in an infobox
 * File:Tentenpart1.jpg to replace File:Tenten.jpg so there's no scroll
 * File:OirokeDoushiA.jpg to replace File:Sexy- Double Knockout Girl.png since it's an anime image
 * File:Tenzo.PNG to replace File:Yamato.jpg since his eyes are actually open


 * I'd say so. It's better than when the tag was added at least. ~SnapperTo 21:32, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Seperate categories
Originally I didn't even want those categories. I just added them in cause someone was complaining that Semantics didn't create galleries just yet. The annotations don't suffer from this. And the categories are redlinked because the categories don't exist till created. Yet another reason why I never wanted those categories in the first place. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) May 4, 2009 @ 00:50 (UTC)

Block
Fixed. Why have you writen "Contributions|Contributions" in your sign instead of just "Contributions"? It is still just one link. Jacce | Talk 05:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 04:20, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked for a year. Jacce | Talk 18:18, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Things like that happends, even I have to sleep sometimes. Jacce | Talk 04:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 12:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 04:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 05:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 14:31, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 16:03, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 17:31, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk 19:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk 12:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Revert war @ Itachi's page
Since it is just one user (with a account), I have giving him/her a warning and explained why, but next he/she does something simmilar, the ban hammer falls. And when it falls, it falls hard. Jacce | Talk 12:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Not glad about the decision or did you just missed it? Jacce | Talk 12:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Deletion
I understand why my page is being considered for deletion. What I don't understand is why I have a user page to begin with. All I ever did was leave one message on the Tailed Beasts talk page and my user page just appeared. I just figured if I had a page I might as well put something on it. Delete it if you think it's necessary. I don't mind. Darth Havoc (talk) 21:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Will you accept grammar correction? I can't speak Japanese so I can't verify any translations, and I don't know anything about the series except for what I saw in the English dub (most of it) and the subbed version of Shippiden. I can't contribute a lot. Darth Havoc (talk) 21:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Aren't you the one who left the "candidate for deletion" message on my page? I kinda assumed only admins could do that. Then again, you know what they say about when you assume things. Darth Havoc (talk) 22:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Thought you might be interested to know that my page actually was deleted last night by Jacce because I didn't bother to read the userpage policy and posted some speculation about the Tailed Beasts on it. We got everything cleared up, though, and Dantman recreated the acceptable part of my page for me. :) Darth Havoc (talk) 17:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Just making sure
Nah, not really. I don't bother myself though. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) May 6, 2009 @ 19:00 (UTC)

Re: Asking ShonenSuki something that has nothing to do with this wiki
I had to ask ShonenSuki something, and I happened to see your post while I was there. I can't read kanji or any other Japanese writing, but I do know that those smaller symbols are called furigana. They're used to help the reader with pronunciation, I think. Darth Havoc (talk) 04:07, 9 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Darth Havoc is right, the smaller signs are furigana, usually written in hiragana or katakana. The basically show how a kanji is supposed to be pronounced. For example, the kanji would have the hiragana じんちゅうりき as the furigana. However, they can also be used to bring more nuance to the text. To take 人柱力 as an example again: it wouldn't be strange to see these kanji with the katakana, for example when an Akatsuki member is talking about Naruto as the jinchūriki of the Nine-Tails. I've also seen the kanji for  and  with the names for Sasuke and Itachi as furigana, or those of Gaara and Kankurō. --ShounenSuki (talk 09:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Plies
Last I knew Dantman was trying to figure out what to do with them. I think there's a forum topic about it... ~SnapperTo 19:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm going to answer another question that you didn't ask me. Aren't you lucky? Four tildes creates a signature, five tildes creates a timestamp. You just pressed the tilde key one time too many. ~SnapperTo 19:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Depends on what is given for User of the jutsu: anything to the effect of "Academy graduates" or "most ninja" would be a basic jutsu. ~SnapperTo 18:59, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Academy Student kind of gives a list. That's about it though. ~SnapperTo 19:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't really think it would be worth it since there would be maybe ten jutsu at most. It's also something that could more easily be done with semantics whenever that gets implemented. ~SnapperTo 20:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Wait, what?
There's a good chance that you actually made a typo and hit ~ a fifth time. gives just your signature (no date), ~ gives your full signature and time, and just gives the time. So if you accidentally hit ~ a single time more than normal your sig will disappear. ^_^ Fun fact, I actually sign with only because I have a specially formatted timestamp embedded into my signature itself, for me ~ gives me two timestamps. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) May 11, 2009 @ 19:31 (UTC)

Rollback
Rollback is something that is given to users who constantly reverts vandalism and such edits. As a rollback user you get a extra button that says "rollback". When it is pressed, all edits of the latest user on a page is remowed. As an example: if you have made five bad edits on a page, a rollback just need to press his/hers rollback button and all edits are removed and the page returns to the state it had before you edit it. Jacce | Talk 19:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I put it like this: let us say you just edited Sasuke's page. Along comes a vandal and has some "fun" on Sasukes page. However, I notice it and use my rollback to revert the edit back to your version. In short, it only reverts the latest user/IP numbers edits, and thats it. You can't make any choice, only the latest users edits to the second latest user. Jacce | Talk 19:41, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Yup, the only difference is that it is done immediately, you can't make any edits; it just says "reverted edits by..." and it is marked "minor edit" by itself, all in one press. Jacce | Talk 19:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Only Dantman can give a proper answer, but I don't think he is ungenerous with rollback. Jacce | Talk 19:57, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Sure you can have the flag, I haven't seen you do much reverting so I didn't pick you out as someone to just randomly give the flag. Jacce is missing one differential note. rollback reverts all the recent edits by one user, undo reverts a single edit. So rollback can easily fix vandalism that is done in multiple edits. The thing you have to be careful of is if Vandal A makes an edit, then Vandal B (or a user) makes and edit, then Vandal A makes two more edits. Only those two recent vandalism edits will be reverted. Thankfully this is much easier to spot nowadays because Wikia finally enabled the feature I committed into 1.13 myself (a diff of what was reverted on the rollback page). ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) May 13, 2009 @ 20:10 (UTC)

Re: Thoughts on Naruto and its -pedia
Um...What's "Hahaha, moooooo" supposed to be? It's not really important, but I'm extremely curious now. Darth Havoc (talk) 22:27, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Specials
The scen came from episode 57, however; so far these specials has been considerd "non-canon" and been removed from the wiki. Jacce | Talk 19:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Sure, I know every chapter and episode by page and second, everything is in my mind. ;) :D

No, not really, even though I'm quite skilled in digging up info. :-* However in this case, I just looked into the comments (all 356) to the video, found one that said that it was in either shipuden 57 or 58, and then it was just to look at those episodes specials. Jacce | Talk 20:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: To And Too

 * Yes i'm very well aware about the laws of the english language.....AlienGamer | Talk 14:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Wat u saw there was me undoing an action...but i made 1 change...but didn't spot that too will be changed to to as well..AlienGamer | Talk 14:36, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Kakashi Chronicles
Actually, it was Annaatar. I just removed his/her sign from the page. I think I should ask ShounenSuki about this. Jacce | Talk 15:11, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Ranks
Those are obsolete. We used to alias bureaucrat=kage, sysop=jonin, rollback=tokubetsu jonin, user=genin, anon=academy student just for some fun. However I removed this recently because people started to ask for "chunin exams" and "promotions" and were turning simple permission flags into a social status game. The userboxes were created then. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) May 16, 2009 @ 19:17 (UTC)

Re: Topjo1
I was a bit on edge, I had a busy week. Jacce | Talk 10:36, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

My signature
I did. well sort of. I try my best.

Kunoichi101 (talk) 01:40, 25 May 2009 (UTC)kunoichi101Kunoichi101 (talk) 01:40, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Letter capitalizion in links
Because MediaWiki was created for all sorts of encyclopedia (ok, well actually more like for Wikipedia), and Gym is not the same as GYM. There are a large number of cases in standard Encyclopedia where case does matter. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) May 25, 2009 @ 20:46 (UTC)