User talk:SuperN

My Comment...
Why did you revert my comment in Naruto's trivia section? If there was some error with saying that it wasn't the first instance where the relationship was directly stated then it's understandable (a link to where it did occur would be nice...). I'm just looking for some kind of explaination of what I thought was a valid point being removed is all. --mini9tailedfox 08:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Featured
SuperN, I already mentioned that we already have Narutopedia:Random Feature. Please don't go redoing something already setup, if something isn't being updated work on that instead.

Also please understand that voting systems are very bad ways of deciding things. Featuring things based on votes does nothing to showcase the quality of an article. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 15, 2009 @ 13:34 (UTC)

User talkpages
SuperN, please stop blanking your talkpage and redirecting it elsewhere. Talkpages do not belong to users, they are a place to leave messages to that user, and also act as an archive of those messages. If a talkpage becomes to large it can be archived, but messages are not removed. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 15, 2009 @ 13:38 (UTC)


 * This is a warning now, your talkpage is not your property, and what you are doing is disruptive and makes it hard for other users to view your talk history and send messages to you. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 15, 2009 @ 13:57 (UTC)


 * The Narutopedia is not part of Wikipedia, those policies have nothing to do with the wiki, keeping fully history on talkpages is something we do on the wiki here, it's not just blindly following something Wikipedia came up with. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 15, 2009 @ 14:05 (UTC)

Why is it so necessary to remove comments from your talkpage? If you want to get rid of finished discussions, feel free to start an archive page. Help:Archiving has some helpful information. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 15, 2009 @ 14:49 (UTC)


 * Please stop posting notices about ignoring comments made by other users. Ignoring comments is disruputive to communication on the wiki. Any user that doesn't communicate with the other users on the wiki disrupts the foundations of collaboration and concensus. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 15, 2009 @ 15:19 (UTC)

Raiga
Did you know how to spell decreased?! I getting serious!

I should ask you the same question. Deceased please sign your posts. --SuperN 18:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

sorry.....about the spelling.....

Sincerely Kunoichi101 18:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)kunoichi101Kunoichi101 18:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

You're forgiven....--SuperN 18:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Policy pages
Just so you know, we have a few policy pages you can point people to for more information. You can find all of these inside of Category:Policy. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Mar 19, 2009 @ 02:40 (UTC)
 * For info on naming guides and info about romaji (uu/ū) in names: Narutopedia:Naming policy
 * For rules on use of images and the images themselves: Narutopedia:Image policy
 * For use of talkpages and forum pages: Narutopedia:Talkpage policy
 * For use of userpages: Narutopedia:Userpage policy
 * Thank you for the information.--SuperN 02:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

HEY YOU!!
You didn't answer me yet! Itachi HAS Susanoo in his list and it's also a bloodline, and you said we don't add bloodlines. so why it in HIS LIST?!!
 * Please sign your comments. At the time when you were looking at Itachi's page it was protected with the error of having Mangekyou Sharingan on the list. Itachi is however seen using Susanoo while Madara hasn't. If you look again, as the page has been corrected of this over site, you will see that this Bloodline Technique is no longer there. ~Super Novice~ Talk to Me 18:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I know Ultimate had just removed the quotes from the Kyuubi section but I do not see why, they are sayings from the Manga and should be there. It is not like it has every little thing that fox has said. -Juubi no Ryuu

Sakura
Deary, three periods can't be followed by a comma, it's grammatically incorrect... Hakinu 20:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Immortality/ Eternal Youth/ Long Lifespan
Okay, I understand now re: Pain (Nagato) being included in the list. You might be on to something about that.--Ethelion 05:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Orochimaru
The information was technically correct. At least the gist of it. It needed a good rewrite though ^^ --ShounenSuki (talk 00:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Jiraiya
You don't want to put biased information like "widely known as the most powerful of the Sannin", either. Such information has no credible source or basis.
 * Jiraiya is the 'most powerful' of the Sannin due to having a higher Databook number(71) then Orochimaru and Tsunade(70). The information you are putting in is already stated in the article. ~Super Novice-Talk to Me~ 15:45, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Whirlpool
Hey i know your gonna erase this but why do you keep on reverting it? It's YOU that keep changing it, not me. Mine are based on facts.XPaperxHeartx 04:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)xPaperxHeartx

Re: Blocking
Jacce already did that one. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 2, 2009 @ 17:10 (UTC)

Group Membership
There are no "higher rank[s]" on the wiki, only permission flags. Wikia gives us rollback which I can give and revoke easily myself, it just gives people the ability to use the rollback function, I normally hand it out whenever someone is doing a lot of vandalism reverting. And there is sysop which is the basic catch all admin flag that gives delete, protect, protectsite, block, import, and also includes an implicit rollback flag. I only hand those out on rare occasions so only TheUltimate3 and Jacce have it. And finally there is the bureaucrat flag which only I have that allows me to give/revoke the rollback flag, and only give the sysop and bureaucrat flags. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 4, 2009 @ 05:29 (UTC)

Re: Kankuro
Why do you keep erasing my posts on Kankuro's page? You've just got me in trouble for vandalism and I'm not even vandalising. I didn't even erase anything from the original posts, I reorganized it and in turn you erased my entire edit. Please explain your reasons for doing so to me, despite your page saying you don't respond, because apparently, you've been doing this to every other page you've edited and it's irritating me now that I've actually gotten in trouble for something I didn't even do. Missmurderisnic (talk) 20:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Errors? Such as what? the only thing I did was put the links in the proper places. As for my way of organization, I put it in a way that was easier to read but whatever. I'm done posting on this site period if I'm going to be harassed for something stupid like this. So much for my "contribution". Missmurderisnic (talk) 21:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Clean up
Since I haven't seen any of the movies, I've already done all I can do for Doto. As for Sai, I'll work on that whenever I get to S (currently on Mi). ~SnapperTo 21:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Why delete my Sharingan posts ...????
Hey you.... i demand an answer to the deletion of my sharingan posts....? i have just posted Types of Mangekyo Sharingan which is true then you've deleted it.... I demand an answer!!!! For the Wikia Owner Pls look over to this guy.... he/she keep deleting our posts.... He/She Is a total jackass... SuperN..... You are not and will not be acknowleged to be a damned fan of Naruto.... May you die before Naruto Manga ends..... So you will not know the ending of it....!!! Max301 =>


 * SuperN, please ignore the harassment, I'm currently dealing with the user. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 6, 2009 @ 19:40 (UTC)
 * Thank you Dantman, I was actually trying to think of a non-aggressive way of responding to that before you posted.  ¥ S uper N ovice ↔ T alk 2 M e  ¥ 19:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Clan categories
SuperN, the clan categories weren't meant to be used the way you are putting them in. In fact clan categories shouldn't even exist anymore. The clan categories were added by the title icon and I finally got around to migrating clan categories into the Clan annotation. So the clan categories shouldn't even exist anymore, they've been replaced with a semantic annotation which I can even add a drilldown filter onto Special:BrowseData/Characters for. ~ NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Apr 7, 2009 @ 17:13 (UTC)