Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-1251315-20140820175011/@comment-4271790-20140908183723

Munchvtec wrote: WindStar7125 wrote: Ten Tailed Fox wrote: Elveonora wrote: Ten Tailed Fox wrote: Not in the case of mass approval for the newer version and there was an overwhelming consensus in favor of adding it back in, even among those who disagreed with the details of the decision. So yes, I favored the new version. It'd be counter productive otherwise. Let me count... 1+1+1= ... 3 I think? What a mass approval from yourself, Ulti and Reliops

Add Windstar, Cerez, and MangekyouSasuke to that as well. Great now my name is mentioned... someone explain to me what another sysop here would do... read the discussion, it doesn't need to be said again. Exactly my point. It doesn't need to be said again. It is basically a pipe dream to find a sysop in which all users would agree is unbiased. Any time a user disagrees with a sysop, that sysop is accused of being biased. Even if there was a new sysop, the instant that sysop disagrees with another person, then uses his sysop tools, the user the sysop argues with accuses the sysop of being "biased."