User talk:Rachin123

Re: Talkpage input 2
Done mate. I had already given input on one of the two discussions already :p Munchvtec (talk) 19:04, June 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Would you mind taking a look at this? Munchvtec (talk) 02:47, June 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks @rai Munchvtec (talk) 02:55, June 22, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Move
No, I won't revert the edits. If you look at the page history, you will see that one user arbitrarily changed the title in the past without gaining any consensus whatsoever just because that name bothered him, which is not a reason at all to change page names. Given that the old title of "Ink Creation" was the agreed title, I moved the page back to that agreed title. I didn't notice it until I saw your talkpage posts about it. The discussion can continue regardless of the name change, because the title the article now uses was the previously agreed page name. --Sajuuk 19:34, June 19, 2016 (UTC)

RE:Thank You
No prob, happy to help out :) --Sarutobii2 (talk) 13:05, June 27, 2016 (UTC)

That thread
Yo! I really do apologize if i came off as rude. I was being rude. Hope we're cool mate. Munchvtec (talk) 20:08, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * You're taking me WAYYYYY to seriously man :/ I'm Munch, if i say something rude, that rude statement is only meant to remain there. It's nothing but a petty argument between friends, no? Are we not allowed to argue at all? Must i kiss your ass? Jeez, sorry mate. Munchvtec (talk) 22:39, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * Anything that i say that comes off as rude is only for that specific thing or moment. That's it. Munchvtec (talk) 22:41, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know what was so rude about this comment:


 * "Nah, it's not a reality check. A reality check is an occasion on which one is reminded of the state of things in the real world.


 * Naruto is very, very far from reality."Munchvtec (talk) 22:45, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * Here's the order of things. I apologized, you said i was forgiven. I do nothing (at least to my knowledge all i did was define a phrase showing disagreement) and i get another message saying i'm being rude? What the fuck! To me it seems like you just don't want me commenting :/ As there was nothing rude about my last comment in that thread yet you're triggered >.< I'm just going to let this one go for the sake of things but know that i honest to goodness had no intent on being rude... Munchvtec (talk) 00:05, July 4, 2016 (UTC)

Might need you to step in.
SwordSlayer99 among other users on a certain thread, are being insulting and hostile and I do believe they are trolling. They also refuse to listen to anybody. I seriously think they are trolling man. QuakingStar (talk) 03:00, July 5, 2016 (UTC)

Thread
Yo. Just saw this thread. Something like this is probably better removed, they're not really starting any discussion, just posting to state some personal opinion without making any explanation as to why. Just some friendly advice, is all. :) --Sajuuk 21:50, July 10, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Concern
Depending on the user, you can tell by the edits alone. To be absolutely sure, you'd have to request a Check User, but as you can tell by the page, there are restrictions. I've learned that the central wiki is rather fickle when it comes to requests about this. In the past, I got completely different reactions in different moments, about very similar situations. One time they ran the tool alright, and the other, they out-right refused, saying there was not enough evidence to run the tool. Regardless, you should always resort to the sysop requests page first. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 12:07, July 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests can only be filed by sysops/bureaucrats of the wiki and the response you get will vary by which staff member picks up the ticket. --Sajuuk 12:12, July 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * I leave the matter in Omni's hands since you went to him fist and in case he's already contacted wikia. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 00:12, July 13, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not that i don't care, it's that 2 users sharing the same views in versus threads is extremely common with only 2 options to choose from. Unless he shares incorrect grammar or something else that's undoubtedly identifiable, im not going to contact wikia without evidence. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 14:40, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

re: message
If you want to take my post out of context, feel free to do so. The post was a response to the point that he "did not get a warning" about the block, so I pointed it out to him in a polite and casual manner that he could have easily found out that he was blocked by trying to make edits to the wiki.

Additionally, he would have received an email from the wiki if he was following his own userpage, notifying him of the block (as when you are blocked and you follow your own userpage/user talkpage, the system emails you with a notice that your userpage was edited, with the block reason given there).

My message does not match the definition of "harassment" under any circumstances (unlike QuakingStar's blatantly vitriolic response), so do not edit my comments claiming harassment on talkpages again, as that is not your call to make. --Sajuuk 21:37, July 13, 2016 (UTC)


 * Good to see this conversation is over. Everybody play nice now. Hint.--TheUltimate3 Akimichi Symbol.svg (talk) 23:45, July 13, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Hmmm
I see. Very well. That's good to hear. Apologizes to both of you then.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 12:53, July 14, 2016 (UTC)