Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1216896-20180223202243/@comment-3279282-20180228191433

AsianReaper wrote: I misrepresented your argument to make it easier to attack?

How so?

I literally asked you to clarify your point, because as it stood I couldn't see its relevance in the conversation unless you were meaning it as a way to say that the amount of @Kunoichi's edits weren't indicative of their substantial contribution.

But by all means, if that's not what you meant to say by your statement, then clarify. I was only asking if that's what you meant.

In fact, by your site's definition, I should have used your statement, exaggerated it, and used it to attack you or argue with you. I only asked for clarification.

You willingly misinterpreted what I said. I never said "I think @Kunoichi's 30,000 edits to the wiki over the various articles hasn't been a substantial contribution". I said that the number of your edits does not represent your contribution. It represents the number of your edits, nothing else. If user A has 50 edits full of spam and user B has 10 edits full of improvements on articles, then user B has contributed more to the wiki.