Talk:Indra's Arrow

Susanoo Weapon
I think, this article can be moved to Susanoo#Weaponry. It is short and unnamed and doesn't need a page.--Salamancc (talk) 06:40, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

i agree with this being done. --Munchvtec (talk) 12:02, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

Actually i change my mind. this should stay as it's own article considering it's a different jutsu or it could be added to the chidori page. Munchvtec (talk) 17:12, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

Delete?
As in the topic above, I see no reason to keep a page like this, when all of its info can be found here.-- JOA20 20:04, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
 * I have no clue why it was made. But it does need to be deleted, when we have the information in store in another article.


 * Edit: No need for deletion anymore, huh? Indra's arrow must be noted. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 23:31, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

Raiton & Indra
I didn't read the chapters carefully... was this confirmed to be Raiton? • Seelentau 愛 議 23:46, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * Not really. Indra's arrow could be a non-natured Susanoo arrow, Sasuke maybe just added lightning chakra to it. Who knows? • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 23:48, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * But it's using the TB's chakras which should be normal chakra and not lightning chakra... If the LR classification is just based on the looks of the technique, it should be removed. • Seelentau 愛 議 23:50, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * All we know is that Indra had a super-strong Susanoo arrow. Maybe Sasuke needed the TB chakra to get it to be super-strong and back to Indra's level, and Sasuke made it stronger by adding lightning chakra to it. Who knows? But you know already, we should wait for other's responses on this. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 23:54, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

How do we know that? Did he use it or was it just named after him? • Seelentau 愛 議 23:55, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, why would it be named "Indra's Arrow" if he didn't use it? • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 23:57, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * No idea, but the name of a technique shouldn't be proof of who used it. What you're saying is basically "It's named after him because he used it and he used it because it's named after him". Do you understand why that's nonsense? • Seelentau 愛 議 23:59, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * No, I don't. Can you please give me other examples of techniques that were named from a certain character in the manga but not used by that character? • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 00:01, October 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * There are none. I can't really explain how I meant that, maybe someone else can. • Seelentau 愛 議 00:10, October 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay then. We'll wait for others on this so we can decide whether or not Indra should be a user. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 00:30, October 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * You're using X as confirmation for Y and Y as confirmation for X. You say "Statement X is true because of fact Y and statement Y is true because of fact X". • Seelentau 愛 議 00:34, October 24, 2014 (UTC)

If it makes you happy, you can go ahead and remove it. I'm just saying we'll ask for others' opinions on this later. • WindStar7125     00:39, October 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * I can see them completely ignoring their logical fallacies and simply saying "It's named after him so he used it, hurrdurr". The atom bomb was called "Fat Man", but wasn't used by a fat man, either. • Seelentau 愛 議 00:42, October 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, well, well, we'll wait and see when they come :P. Me getting into a harsh argument with you isn't my kind of thing, so you can do what you want. • WindStar7125   WindStar7125 Task.svg WindStar7125's Task.svg 00:46, October 24, 2014 (UTC)