User talk:Ratmanz0000

Загрузка Изображений
Hi. I noticed a lot of your uploads were either unlicensed or just duplicates of the same image without any visible changes in quality. I feel like you should take a look at the image policy before trying to make any uploads. Hope that helps. - Ventillate { About Me | Message | My Work } 18:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I just compressed the images that were already uploaded to optimize the traffic. The lighter the image, the less traffic it takes to download it, and the page opens faster. Yes, I compressed without any loss.Ratmanz0000 (talk) 18:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * To use File:BaryonMode.png as an example: your compression reduced the image from 160 kb to 64 kb. That is not a meaningful difference. Even pretending for a moment that someone truly does have download speeds that bad, images are scaled down within articles and are furthermore converted to webp format, which is a smaller file size than whatever the image originally is. The result is that you're probably saving somebody 10 kb of data, at best. So please stop; this is not a useful way to spend your time. ~SnapperTo 20:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Not really. If the file is smaller then. The server will spend less time and resources to scale and send the image to the client. The more the meme is drawn to the image, the more noticeable the compression effect is. In any case, this is not a reason to cancel the changes. Ratmanz0000 (talk) 20:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with Snapper2 here. The differences are almost unnoticeable to constitute as a legitimate change to the images. In terms of image processing, server response would barely matter because these files typically do not exceed 5 MB. The data sizes of the images alone doesn't or shouldn't matter unless you're talking about files ranging hundreds of MB or even a GB, which is not reflected in the images that are often uploaded here. If I upload a 2 MB image compared to 2.14 MB, I could probably save a few nanoseconds in loading. It doesn't matter because loading speeds aren't noticeably affected by the images unless they're somehow extremely large files. - Ventillate { About Me | Message | My Work } 20:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * But it matters. Especially when several people apply for a single file at once. Or save most files in jpg, it is easier than png. Amazon cuts the image quality to a minimum for this reason, and Fandon lags. Everyone suffers. If you compress at least images from the 100 most popular articles, the speed would increase by 10-15% at least. For each user. But that's not the main problem. From the English wiki, people drag pictures, save them at home. Making life worse is no longer the world. And this is a joke or a joke. And reality.

Ratmanz0000 (talk) 22:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Your argument isn't sufficient enough for what you're trying to explain. No one is going to track the technicalities of image processing, downloads, and file compression. At worst, you're waiting a very few extra seconds. There's no point in arguing with you on this anymore, because people aren't gonna nitpick on the speeds of server-to-client interactions regarding these images. I feel like you're putting in way too much wasted effort because the images you compress upload are also an extremely small fraction of the images in all wikis including this one. It won't make a difference, but think what you will. - Ventillate { About Me | Message | My Work } 23:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * This isn't the 90s anymore. Data is cheap. If Fandom truly wanted to reduce the workload on their servers, they would not place unnecessary crap that needs to be loaded on each page view. Yet they do, a lot. So if Fandom doesn't benefit from you doing this, and if the typical reader doesn't benefit from you doing this, then you are not doing something that appreciably benefits anybody. The cynical view is that you want upload credits, so that it says "Added by Ratmanz0000" when people look at the image. I'll choose the believe that isn't the case and that you're trying to improve the wiki in a very misguided way.
 * I don't care about the label. If someone does something better than me, then let them. It's happened before.Ratmanz0000 (talk) 22:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If you want to improve the wiki's images, do so by uploading images that are better quality. File:Eight Gates-Rock Lee.png was a poor quality image even before you compressed it; it looks as though it's a screenshot of an upscaled 480p stream. If you can find a better version of the image, by all means upload it. ~SnapperTo 21:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * How? I use lossless compression. Therefore, the gain in size for png is small, 15-20% if the image is black and white, you can compress it to 60-70%. Fun fact. If you improve the image quality through AI, and then compress it separately to jpg. the quality will increase. All thanks to the blur.Ratmanz0000 (talk) 22:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)