Forum:Part I and II pics in infobox?

What about this? Putting a character's Part I appearance (if they were in the first part first) and Part II appearance in the infobox? Now bring on a stupid reason why this isn't possible. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 04:47, June 14, 2012 (UTC)


 * hmmm... back then Star Blazer 5 caused this incident by using images which cause by breaking the image policy. i believe this is the reason. Kunoichi101 (talk) 04:49, June 14, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101

What about this? --OmegaRasengan (talk) 04:53, June 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * this is anime-only summoning beast. Kunoichi101 (talk) 05:17, June 14, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101

and somehow of course, this may be not like OnePiece wiki and Bleack wiki. according to the Star Blazer 5 user talk page from the edits section. Kunoichi101 (talk) 05:21, June 14, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101
 * Looking at the character's pages at One Piece Wiki and Bleach Wiki it does seem possible. It would be helpful to have that here though. - White Flash - (Talk) - 05:34, June 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * yes, true, but will the admins. agree with that? Kunoichi101 (talk) 00:54, June 15, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101
 * TheUltimate3 prefers just their original images. Keeps everything...simple. Especially because we have that little habit of having manga images when there is a discrepancy between manga and anime portrayals. This would just get stupid if we then decided to add Part II images as well.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 01:13, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Same as former.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 01:29, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

and there you have it. This discussion is concluded. 02:37, June 15, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101

TheUltimate3 is right — ¤ U LTIMATE S UPREME ¤ (T@lk) 05:31, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

Wait, can I voice out my opinion? This is a good idea, but the problem is the infoboxes with 'anime' and 'manga' images. ~IndxcvNovelist (talk 08:36, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * For the manga-anime difference, we could just put the manga image in the 'Appearance'.--Spcmn (talk) 13:53, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * The issue comes in because, technically, all anime images are wrong in their portrayals and it is our task to show things correctly. We use anime images at all because they are nicer and usually pulling manga images out of the woodwork tends to be sketchy. Anyway, back to the issue of correctness, while what I said was true, technically if the discrepancy is minor enough, the issue slides and anime picture alone goes up. If it is not however, then we have dual pictures in the infobox of anime and manga.
 * Now I am completely biased on this issue, as every time we've had this discussion, I was in favor of pushing manga images out. Hell the reason we even having the tabs in infoboxes was to quell this discussion from coming up again.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 14:23, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

so we have to wait for the others decided? if not, this forum must be concluded. Kunoichi101 (talk) 16:09, June 15, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101

So it isn't possible just because your personal opinion? "Simple"? Honestly, that is pretty dumb. Why don't other admins vote on whether this goes or not? This shouldn't happen just because one admin says no. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 23:01, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Image policy has always dictated for images from part I to be used for part I characters for as long as I can remember. I don't know who implemented it, but that's not simply a "one person decided, this is the only way" situation, unless one person way back put that in. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:10, June 19, 2012 (UTC)


 * No. It's simple because we don't have to deal with the crap of having 4+ images in the infoboxes.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg (talk) 00:29, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's easy. We use the tabber function! "Manga"→"Anime"→"Full-body image"→"costume change 1,2 and 3"→"Allied Shinobi Forces look"→"look on face when deceased" and lets have a pordy. Can I get a whut whut?--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 01:15, June 19, 2012 (UTC)

Well if you ask me the policy sounds pretty lame. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 01:40, June 19, 2012 (UTC)