Narutopedia:Sysop Requests

Protection-related requests

 * Gyūki - Edit warring. -- WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 23:06, February 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * I see a sysop has indeed locked the page. Wondering where the verification of it being done is though... -- WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 07:09, February 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * Expansive Truth-Seeking Ball - User: Thebest423r and his/her sockpuppet account keep edit warring with others in order to insert untrue information in the article, i.e.: "A vast expanding mass of chaos with power to reshape the universe by obliterating it to nothing first," when it was stated to reshape the world. (Strangely enough, User:Zkelvln also did the same thing months ago) 01:09, March 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Boruto Uzumaki - http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Boruto_Uzumaki?action=history changing an unneccessary name of Boruto Kunoichi101 (talk) 00:42, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:55, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sage - User: Narutofan92 is persistently restoring his/her edits despite others reverting them. 05:30, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * The user is at it again. Messaging the user didn't work, and many others reverting his edits and using edit summaries doesn't work either. It seems whenever that user's edit is undone, the user will come back hours later and just restore again. Not sure what to do anymore. Is it possible for the page to be fully protected?
 * EDIT: Scratch that, I tried this. Will bump this request if it still does not work 05:09, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * I guess the warning I put there isn't visible to those who use Visual Editor. Bumping this request. User Narutofan92 will still not relent in restoring the same edit that multiple users have reverted. I tried his talkpage, and that didn't work, so I don't know what to do... 14:30, April 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Is it possible that Boruto Uzumaki be unprotected soon? I have some edits I need to make to the article. 06:20, March 31, 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 15:28, March 31, 2015 (UTC)
 * Project:Image policy: I don't believe this needs to be sysop locked any further, especially as the talkpage is being ignored. --Sajuuk talk 12:39, April 13, 2015 (UTC)
 * Summon: Convert this to a full redirect using the redirect syntax, instead of a soft redirect. --Sajuuk talk 19:53, April 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * smw queries don't work correctly if that's a normal redirect. ~SnapperTo 19:56, April 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * Wasn't aware. But maybe a fix for that should be sought? AKA, a soft redirect specifically just for SMW queries. --Sajuuk talk 20:05, April 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * Akatsuki - Could a sysop change the image for Deidara and Sasori to this png version of the image? Thanks. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 09:39, May 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * Please protect this image. There is some revert warring going on with it. 04:00, May 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Gottcha covered. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Rinnegan Sasuke.svg 04:14, May 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ōtsutsuki Clan - A user is persistently making needless edits to the article even after being warned a few times. 02:04, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:31, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * Can a sysop remove protection from Ōtsutsuki Clan, because I have to add this svg image in the article.--Mecha Naruto (talk) 11:01, May 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * Can I ask where you found/made that from? I do not recall the clan having a symbol.--TheUltimate3 Akimichi Symbol.svg (talk) 11:03, May 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * It was made by User:Shodai Tsuchi, it is a symbol from war between the Otsutsuki families, the main family's symbol is this, what we are having is branch family icon in infobox.--Mecha Naruto (talk) 11:10, May 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. Don't make me regret it.--TheUltimate3 Akimichi Symbol.svg (talk) 11:17, May 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * Kamui - editing war over whether or not Shin Uchiha and his kin and use it or not. --Jizo 悟 (talk) 06:55, June 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sarada Uchiha - Please protect this now. Way too many random users inserting random things. 10:51, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * Could someone add this image to Sarada's article since its currently protected. --Sarada Uzumaki (talk) 14:49, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * Naruto: Uzumaki Chronicles: Same editor keeps adding the same "overly detailed" plot overview that has been removed with clear reasoning several times by multiple editors, the editor in question doesn't seem capable of reading editor requests. The article should be protected and the user should be warned on their talkpage. --Sajuuk tce 21:29, June 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Left a message on the user's talk page. We'll see what happens. ~SnapperTo 00:04, June 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * From experience, that message is probably going to be ignored by the user, but we'll see. If he continues to add the same content again, it'll need protection and probably a block. If possible, keep an eye on the page. --Sajuuk tce 09:40, June 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Regeneration Ability: Indefinite protection for a minor edit war is unnecessary. A week is more than enough, since the indefinitely protection is probably going to go unnoticed until users complain that they can't edit the page. Indefinite sysop protection is generally reserved for templates and should never be used on mainspace articles. --Sajuuk tce 17:15, June 19, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sarada Uchiha - Could this page be unlocked? The 3 out of 4 users who vandalised the page have been blocked and the fourth hasn't been back on the wiki since. --Sarada Uzumaki (talk) 20:24, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't agree with unprotecting the page. If users see it's unlocked, it will just be vandalised again. I think we should wait some time before unlocking the page. --Sajuuk Special:Contributions/SuperSajuuk 20:29, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * The page has been protected for 10 days which is pretty long, and in that time, Sasuke and Karin's articles which have the exact same information that was being vandalised on Sarada's articles have been fine, and haven't needed protection.--Sarada Uzumaki (talk) 20:39, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't agree with unprotection either. Not sure you've noticed, but many users have created new accounts solely to complain about the whole Sasuke/Sakura/Sarada/Karin debacle after finding out that they cannot edit the article. I've had to even flat out delete threads recently because users complain about the article in the forums. Not a risk worth taking for the wiki in my opinion. Waiting a bit longer won't hurt. 05:57, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sarada Uchiha: Having problems with edit wars again, should really just be locked for quite a while. --Sajuuk Special:Contributions/SuperSajuuk 11:16, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * Not seeing anything in her history indicated edit waring is happening with that article.--TheUltimate3 Akimichi Symbol.svg (talk) 11:20, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * Naruto: Uzumaki Chronicles: Requested to make use of a sandbox. Message didn't sink in, as it was readded without any trimming or sandbox usage. Protection and a block is advised. --Sajuuk Special:Contributions/SuperSajuuk 19:47, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * This was clearly ignored. Bumping for attention. --Sajuuk 08:38, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * Infobox:Sarada Uchiha - I think it's time it gets unlocked. 05:06, July 2, 2015 (UTC)
 * Like, seriously please. 05:41, July 2, 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 15:07, July 2, 2015 (UTC)
 * Infobox:Shin Uchiha (Clones): Please add Kabuto Yakushi as their Adoptive Father in the Relationship section.--JOA2007:06, July 2, 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 15:07, July 2, 2015 (UTC)
 * Add the Konoha Orphanage affiliation to Shin Uchiha (Clones)? Also, capitalise the word "father"?--Omojuze (talk) 19:16, July 2, 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 02:27, July 3, 2015 (UTC)
 * Add Chōza Akimichi as a leader in infobox of Team Genma, also rename it to Team Chōza please.--Mecha Naruto (talk) 13:41, July 9, 2015 (UTC)
 * For future reference, neither of those pages were protected from editing. ~SnapperTo 16:28, July 9, 2015 (UTC)
 * Is is possible a sysop can add this image to Himawari's article? 01:07, August 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sword of Nunoboko -- edit war of wording between UK and US Kunoichi101 (talk) 04:49, August 23, 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:01, August 23, 2015 (UTC)
 * Hinata Hyūga - |this (Junk Trivia + Loli alert)--Omojuze (talk) 17:05, September 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Jacce | Talk | Contributions 18:09, September 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Hundred Furious Palms - http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Hundred_Furious_Palms?action=history A romaji edit war. just in case if this continues. Kunoichi101 (talk) 20:30, November 6, 2015 (UTC)

Deletion-related requests
''' For non-urgent deletions, please simply add to the page you wish to be deleted. '''


 * : Created without consensus, talkpage appears to be going ignored regarding the matter. It's not used on any pages and should be recreated in a better format if it is necessary and with a consensus. --Sajuuk Special:Contributions/SuperSajuuk 19:03, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * User:SuperSajuuk: Blanking userpages violates the policy. The page cannot be tagged because it is protected. Idrinktearsforsupper (talk) 08:17, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * It has a long page history and does not need to be deleted. Unless you want to have thousands of redlinks all over the wiki. --SuperSajuuk (talk) 08:27, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Then consider this request as obsolete, I misunderstood the policies. Idrinktearsforsupper (talk) 08:45, July 8, 2015 (UTC)

Blocking-related requests
(Edit!Conflict!Yay!)Further, if this is the formatting you seem to have issue with, then at least in my humble opinion, he should be commended for such. Yes it is not much and probably unnecessary, but they it is by no means a bad edit. In fact, having the section in the talk page properly titled and what not is a good thing and I would welcome him to continue if he believes it will help the wiki.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 15:55, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Constantly revert warring over a minor detail in this image for no reason, when nobody else seems to care. --Sajuuk talk 13:17, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Obviously people seem to care enough if a on and off revert war commenced. Not to mention had a discussion went down I would have gone with his edit as Shikamaru's head isn't really necessary. This is more of a "A discussion should be had" and not "block RexGodwin for not agreeing with someone".--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 13:23, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Rex's sole contributions as of late is to edit war over the cropping of pictures. Considering he simply ignores other users and reverts without giving reasons, I would consider this vandalism and unproductive edit count boosting. --Sajuuk talk 13:29, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * He likes to focus on images. See no issue with that. Regardless, I would rather wait and see if he actively ignores discussions made then just block him outright. If you'd rather see what other sysops have to say or simply do it yourself (As I know you are capable of, so this little pony show confuses me.) is up to you. But my personal stance is, if he wants the image chaged or cropped or whatever he or others can bring up a discussion. Only when images are straight up changed for no reason (Like Obito's was a few months back) would images require this much hooplah.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 13:35, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * That is true, I will wait. And I only step in to an issue if there are no sysops around or it's blatant vandalism. Especially as this is in the file namespace, I would prefer sysops to deal with it first. (I've cleaned up the page, archived a lot of stuff and moved the header to a subpage) --Sajuuk talk 13:38, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * - Acting like a kid every time things don't go his way, as can be seen here. His only contributions are constantly editing talkpages (despite being told by multiple users to stop doing) so he needs a timeout. --Sajuuk talk 14:21, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Bumping for attention, also Munchvtec seems to have attitude issues by believing that he doesn't need to listen to editors unless all sysops tell him to stop doing whatever other editors are telling him to stop doing and also appears to be a magnet for trolls to come here and instigate reactions from him (because they know he will reply and not ignore them). There's also the issue that I reported to Snapper2 in which he seems to have an obsession with formatting every talkpage on the wiki which isn't necessary. --Sajuuk talk 14:28, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * SuperSajuuk has refused all of my questions as to what exactly it is im doing wrong. If he's talking about the formatting on talk pages then i also see no issue with me doing that. For the troll thing, yes i do attract ONE vandal but when he comes i kindly ask him to leave and if not then i rarely speak at all. He says that 2 users asked me to stop. those two users are him and snapper2. snapper2 asked me not to delete talk page edits to which i have not done since he asked. If all this warrants a block then wow. Munchvtec (talk) 15:35, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * You are going to have to give me more reasons than that. I have no seen him remove Talk Page edits, but if he was asked to stop and he did stop then fandidilytastic. In the discussion you did link, he did nothing wrong but to call one person for trying to dismiss his and Rachin123's opinion.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 15:43, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * I have asked him to stop going around talkpages and formatting them on a number of occasions now, because it is totally unnecessary but he believes that, unless someone other than me or Snapper2 tells him to stop as well, he can reasonably ignore the requests.
 * There's also the fact that he seems incapable of ignoring trolls and has been told quite a lot of times by people to stop doing this.
 * I don't actually see the user contributing meaningfully to the wiki, going around editing "ancient" talkpages just to format them is pointless.
 * I do believe that users have been blocked in the past (even recently) when they are showing no interest in listening to requests of other editors about their editing practices, I have told Munchvtec a lot of times to stop making pointless edits and he continues anyway, believing that it's fine to ignore editors if it's just the same ones complaining.
 * You can see some examples of the pointless edits he is currently making here: User_talk:Snapper2. --Sajuuk talk 15:52, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Are all of my edits worthless sajuuk or are you only pointing out talk page ones. i do do other work. Munchvtec (talk) 15:54, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Also Munchvtec, as you can see I am speaking in your favor. Try not to undermine that by trying to speak for yourself.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 16:00, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * . I already blocked him for being a sockpuppet and evading an existing block, I'm simply placing this here for other sysops to confirm if I am correct. His edits have included: junk trivia ("stating the obvious", which he did constantly on his main account), adding overly descriptive and sometimes unneeded appearance sections, despite being asked to stop, ignoring editor requests via his talkpage and being involved in vandalism. Oh, and there's the fact it's a sockpuppet account which he uses whenever his main one is blocked, which goes against the sockpuppet policy anyway. --Sajuuk talk 20:49, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * Seams ok to me. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:38, March 28, 2015 (UTC)


 * -- Ignoring the Manual of Writing Style Kunoichi101 (talk) 04:41, April 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure that sysops have told you that this does not warrant a block. Also, stop being so quick to report users to be blocked, unless they're obvious vandals. EDIT: I stand corrected. --Sajuuk talk 07:27, April 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * : I blocked him for being a sockpuppet for User:AngelOfDeath1295, based on the user's name. As with a previous block above, feel free to check and confirm. --Sajuuk talk 08:56, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * Leaving a record here that the user in question decided to harass me on my YouTube channel, demanding that I lower his block on the sockpuppet because it was apparently "harsh", despite being told several times that it would not be lowered. His messages to me simply confirmed that he made a sockpuppet account to bypass a block. --Sajuuk talk 21:49, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * Unnecessary and unneeded edit warring over pictures, despite several warnings to stop this behaviour. I have been told the user does this on every single wiki he visits and disrupts their communities by acting like the only pics that should be used are his own and he appears to revert war whenever people revert his unwanted changes. It has already gotten several pictures sysop locked in the past couple of months and I'm sick of dealing with him. Recommending a block of at least 3 months. --Sajuuk talk 08:38, May 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * : continuously "raping" Sarada's talk page with his anger issues and ignores the warnings he is given, even by the sysops.--Omojuze (talk) 15:47, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * - Spamming duplicate files, uploaded a fanon pic and ignoring talkpage requests to stop. --Sajuuk talk 13:36, June 14, 2015 (UTC)
 * - Ignoring warnings and adding false information in the articles.--Omojuze (talk) 19:28, June 15, 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Gotcha covered. 04:29, June 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * --Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 09:25, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Warned for now.--~Ultimate Supreme  11:02, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * - repeated fanon information in articles, like here, |here, etc... (This shouldn't been done months ago.) Also, I know that grammar mistakes aren't ban-worthy, but from someone who is claiming to be from the US, it just boggles my mind. I really hope a sysop could do something about this, and as soon as possible.--Omojuze (talk) 19:28, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
 * I blocked him for the Guy edit after he made it. This most recent batch of edits seems motivated by an over-desire to document the myriad number of things that are "unknown", which at the moment doesn't seem a blockable offense. Will reconsider if he persists. ~SnapperTo 18:30, July 15, 2015 (UTC)
 * Agreed with Sarutobii2 and Omojuze. I don't know where this reluctance to block users is coming from, but he's constantly inserting unconfirmed, unsourced junk into articles and still ignoring user requests. (You can look at his contributions here too) 22:30, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * - Again he is adding speculation and fanon to characters and technique articles. He's been warned following his last ban and despite it, chosen to ignore requests about his editing habits and has continued adding bizarre things to articles. Warning him doesn't accomplish anything so could he be banned and for longer this time? --Sarutobii2 (talk) 20:29, August 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * For changing Hinata's introduction with false reasoning over and over again despite being warned not to do it. Norleon (talk) 12:48, August 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * A short-term block for ignoring the wiki's rules even when being told to follow them. A Wkia contributor (talk) 12:46, September 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * Creates fake articles without a legitimate source, even when asked. Not the first offense, not the second, so this was honestly expected. (Well they are thought to be fake, they might end up to be truthful, but he refuses to deliver a source)--Omojuze (talk) 16:56, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * "Adding the name of a character from the Naruto: Mission: Protect The Hidden Waterfall Village! (novel)" Isn't this a source? ~SnapperTo 18:58, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * The novel is not translated online, he didn't share a scan of the novel where the character was mentioned either. Just because he said it's from the novel, doesn't mean it's the truth, given he's been adding fanon stuff here before. Don't want to sound pessimistic, but I'm very distrustful with him and he refuses to provide an actual valid source, Saru asked him for one.--Omojuze (talk) 19:23, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * Hisen Senji ~SnapperTo 19:30, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok. And the kanji he's adding are from?--Omojuze (talk) 19:40, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * I dunno. Viz's translation of the manga gives the Japanese for the cast, maybe they do the same for the books they translate? If you find something dubious and can find no supporting evidence, you are free to remove it. ~SnapperTo 20:31, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, at this point it's blatant vandalism, is it not? Don't know 'bout you Snapper, but I'm not willing to clean all this mess up, and I'm not the only one who's annoyed with him either. I don't know where's the reluctance to block people is coming from, but I personally don't like it...--Omojuze (talk) 21:13, October 9, 2015 (UTC)
 * For changing this article's "artefact" to the US version nine times in total, despite being warned multiple times by multiple editors, three times even on his talkpage. The last edit indicated that he's merely trolling, hence a block would be wise in this case. A Wkia contributor (talk) 15:04, October 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * ^Seconded. 15:20, October 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * or for breaking the sockpuppet policy (refer to this message I made on BurgerAlison's talkpage). Since I don't know which account was made first, I reported both. If a sysop can track the first account, the other one can be blocked infinitely. A Wkia contributor (talk) 03:55, October 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * For being a sockpuppet of the blocked user above "Please trade me". Given the recent "quality" of his/her edits, I would recommend a very long block. A Wkia contributor (talk) 01:04, October 13, 2015 (UTC)
 * For changing a jutsu description into a low quality one with an inappropriate word included into it and then changing that into a link for his youtube channel, calling each act of vandalism "more detail".--Umishiru (talk) 03:41, October 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * For adding unnecessary edits and fanon translations to articles he has created. --JouXIII (talk) 21:13, November 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * Keeps removing people's posts in jutsu talk pages. Don't if it is being done in an attempt to silence criticism or does know how to use talk pages properly. Regardless, was warned not to do it again, and proceeded to do so again. He has done it 3 times so far was warned twice. --Umishiru (talk) 06:26, November 14, 2015 (UTC)

Forum-related requests

 * Thread:176952: Blatant spam/advertising. Please delete them (More -> Remove (give no reason) -> Delete (give reason as "spam/advertising"). Based on these spam posts, the user should probably be blocked for spamming/advertising. Would have done it myself, but circumstances...  --Sajuuk 16:54, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * requesting thread 183847#29 to be closed as threat got off topic and users are insulting other users calling them dumb or misinformed

☀~actionmanrandell~


 * Thread:185929 — decision has been made regarding topic.--Cerez 365 ™Hyūga Symbol.svg(talk) 00:17, September 10, 2015 (UTC)

Move requests

 * Water Release: Great Waterfall Flow to "Water Release: Great Waterfall Flow Technique" (It was incorrectly named).--Omojuze (talk) 17:29, September 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * Team 2 to Team Two Kunoichi101 (talk) 21:33, November 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Why? It seems to follow in the trend of Team 7, Team 8, etc. ~SnapperTo 05:55, November 19, 2015 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

 * I'd like any sysop to keep an eye on User:Kunoichi101. I don't think the reasons need to be spelled out in great detail, but I'm sick of her constantly making pointless edits. She has god-knows-how-many warnings to stop, even a recent block doesn't seem to faze her whatsoever. If she continues to make these edits, I would like a sysop to step in and just block her for a very long time. She ignores editors, she continues to make useless edits and she does not contribute in any way to improving the wiki. --Sajuuk talk 22:11, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * Honest question. What exactly about her edits are bad? I have never actually gotten the amount of aggro her edits.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 23:59, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * She is not contributing. Her edits are just minor little things that don't change the page's appearance. She thinks that she's doing it in the course of the manual of style, but the thing is... that's all she does. She doesn't actually improve the content, she just keeps making edits that violate the policy of "don't make edits that don't change the page's appearances".
 * As WindStar7125 pointed out, she has been told nearly 50 times to stop and not one of the 50 warnings makes a single damn impression: she continues despite the warnings. I would encourage you (or any other sysop reading this) to start at her first archive and just read through them all and you can see that she has, over the course of 7 years, received a huge number of "stop making X edit" warnings by literally tons of people (me, Simant, UltimateSupreme, Snapper2, Fmakck, yourself, the list goes on), which she has so far demonstrated she couldn't care about.
 * Honestly, she should have been infinitely blocked a LONG time ago, she does nothing more than harm the wiki with constant edit warring (in which she always violates Revert policy, ignoring talkpage requests and overall not contributing. --Sajuuk talk 08:47, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * Acknowledged. Gotta love my shoddy memory. Will watch more closely, keep my posted. But be sure to not make this a witch hunt. If you see faulty edits report them to me and I'll look into it, don't get into fights in talk pages that just means I can't do much.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō.svg (talk) 10:53, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * Not making it a witch hunt and I don't plan on getting into talkpage fights either with her, I will report every bad edit she makes (I'll also advise WindStar7125 and other active rollbacks to do the same). Don't see why we need to put up with it any more. --Sajuuk talk 12:45, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * Boruto Uzumaki: The page is blocked. Please, can someone add this picture in "Appearance" with the description: "Boruto in Naruto Gaiden"? Narsha | Talk
 * Add Sarada Uchiha as a member of Team Konohamaru, her infobox is locked from editing. Thank you.--Omojuze (talk) 11:16, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * Calling on the sysops to keep an eye on an editor. Based on this edit, they're likely to create a lot of redundant articles with no care for how we do things here. If they spam pages, I request the user to be blocked from the wiki, preferably indefinitely. They're just causing hassle for us and don't seem to care. --Sajuuk 20:10, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * Could something be done about Paladin78? All his edits are either junk or unsourced speculation. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 22:15, July 28, 2015 (UTC)