Talk:Sand Cocoon

???
"Because this and Shield of Sand are somehow different."--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 15:57, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Taijutsu is effective to that, unlike it is to this. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 16:08, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Not true. Spikes are additional: He used them against Sasuke, but didn't against Deidara. Plus, Lee could only break through the Shield of Sand after opening up the Eight Gates, which Sasuke cannot do, hence he didn't have sufficient taijutsu to break it...--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 16:09, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Chapter 82 proves you wrong.--Sarutobii2 (talk) 16:15, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * How exactly? Weakening it =/= breaking through it. O.o And Lee's speed allowed him to bypass it, which Sasuke himself stated to to have.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 16:22, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Lee punched a hole through the sand. Sasuke's punch didn't make a dent. You questioned how they are different, and now you have your answer. Also, the name is a English place holder, which is not a reason to move a article.--Sarutobii2 (talk) 17:01, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * "Lee punched a hole through the sand. Sasuke didn't make a dent." WRONG. Chidori. You know, the whole "Gaara is bleeding so we must retreat" situation... O.o--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 17:06, May 6, 2016 (UTC)

Did some research: Your, so called, "technique" has two different names provided in the set: this (which is another name for Gaara's "Shield of Sand") and this >.> An even bigger reason not to keep the article...--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 17:25, May 6, 2016 (UTC)

Kanji
Does anyone know it?--Sarutobii2 (talk) 17:01, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Stop adding the page without a source or I'll have to issue a block for adding fanon content. You can add it, then have a discussion about keeping it, when you actually have a source for it...--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 17:05, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Page was only added once, just like the amount of times you requested the source, that could be found blindfolded. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 17:34, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * A "source" means "a japanese source", since the kanji could easily be the ones of Shield of Sand and is a mistake english translations do a lot. We record the manga, not an english adaptation of it.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 17:37, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * I gave you a source, it's just not to your approval. Also we do record the English adaption, hence English anime names in the infobox. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 18:03, May 6, 2016 (UTC)

Eh, isn't the picture on that card from Gaara's use of Suna no Tate? • Seelentau 愛 議 18:15, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * There's also this. • Seelentau 愛 議 20:38, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * It is.... @Saru: While it would be true, names we use come from a Japanese source, since we don't use viz/sub translations. So if you don't have a source for it, it's best not to add it, especially from an unreliable material.--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 21:00, May 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * We don't use English names because we have the Japanese names already, in this case, we don't. Also, unless there's a policy or discussion, all that is your opinion.


 * And as the article listed, the technique uses a hand sign and was stronger than its parent technique against taijutsu. That's proof enough to warrant an article, named or unnamed. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 12:23, May 7, 2016 (UTC)