User talk:SuperSajuuk

RE: Opinion Needed
Hmm, I've seen those types of threads on other wikis before. While personally I don't like them because they feel like spam, they are discussing content from the series (somewhat). So I don't think it's really violating any policies. Seems kind of juvenile imo, but if users have fun while discussing the series, idk if mods should intervene. AsianReaper (talk) 04:21, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * ^Something like this. Sure, it would be better off in a chat room or something, but we've had exceptions before. Just as long as it doesn't become a bad habit, such a thread happening only once doesn't hurt anything, given it's garnered a substantial amount of replies. 20:59, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. 21:04, September 12, 2016 (UTC)

RE: Edits
Sorry but, I have the PlayStation Vita, only have several PlayStation Vita games: Dragon Ball, One piece, Uncharted, Gravity Rush, God of War, Digimon, Assassin's Creed, Mortal Kombat, etc. The game is Naruto has to PlayStation Portable, it is that're just missing something is the first Naruto game for PlayStation Vita the successor of PlayStation Portable, only it does not have any Naruto game for PS Vita, it is because of the fans who are wanting. BabyKratosxZeus (talk) 13:17, September 15, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Eh?
Hi, not really. It's just the case English isn't my mother tongue, that's why I can often write "treat" or "threat" instead of the actual "thread" without realising the mistake immediately. Of course, it's not intentional, at least I try to correct it when I notice that after posting the message. Ravenlot 27 (talk) 16:27, September 15, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Minor edits
I don't think I have ever marked an edit as a minor edit. As for using a bot, that would either entail me requesting someone else running such edits with a bot, which means waiting until whoever has one seeing and running my request, or having a bot myself, and I don't think my knowledge of wiki mark-up is quite up to par for properly using a bot. Having a bot also means I'm one of the people who others request bot edits from, and that sounds very unappealing to me. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 18:57, September 19, 2016 (UTC)

WSJ Wiki
Are you available to improve on this wiki? 22:38, September 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Well there is no need to be rude about it i was asking politely and only once. 17:37, September 24, 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not asking users to join i'm asking for assistance and besides what am i supposed to do not ask at all and wait for users to come build the wiki? 17:59, September 24, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Part 1 Anime Fillers
I would have done so earlier, it's just that after Naruto and Sasuke's fight, when Jiraiya had arrived at the hospital and told Naruto that they would set off for three years once he got out (and the episode ended promptly), I went straight to Shippuden episode #1 - Homecoming. I'd love to summarise the Part 1 filler episodes, but that means I've actually got to watch them all. I may decide to watch them once I've watched Shippuden in its entirety, at which point yes, I will summarise those pages and thus eliminate the wiki tags. Sorry for the inconvenience... Murali9395 (talk) 14:43, September 22, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah sure, I'll update whatever I can when I get the chance. And thanks, cause I'd really like to have the titles on this wiki consistent with the same format (some pages have the English dub title, others the literal Japanese translations, etc.) Murali9395 (talk) 14:54, September 22, 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, but I am a little confused. How to add pictures in articles without violating the policies? Thankyou.--Aizaz Arif (talk) 12:26, September 27, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Uploads
Well, I'm not very technical and don't have the time (at the moment) to figure out how to convert a JPG to a PNG (the only option I have to download is a JPG). However, I think you will find that the image I uploaded is better than the initial one, as you can clearly see the outlines of Naruto and Sasuke's characters from previous shots. My source comes from this 1080p album (http://imgur.com/a/pgh01) if you or Sarutobii would like to upload the improved image. --KirinNOTKarin98 (talk) 20:07, September 30, 2016 (UTC)

re: Edits
well its an interesting fact im not a huge fan of his but he was spoken to by someone at pierrot if there was something he liked to include into the episode and Kishimoto knows him from youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xfo_XaMmDlA so i found that just an interesting Ragnaration (talk) 20:54, October 2, 2016 (UTC)ragnaration

did you even look at the video in it kishi stated how strange it was to meet a person that he knew from youtube so thats a fact. if you think the video is fake i found the original video from viz http://www.viz.com/blog/posts/sj-podcast-kishimoto-sensei-special and here is his video of the yotube dude https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3ZH2W6sehA and heres the older before the viz thing came around support his story https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVs_HY85wTc. fan's opinion are not subbosed to be on this wiki but facts are so in my mind it should be on there (Ragnaration (talk) 21:11, October 2, 2016 (UTC)Ragnaration)

Too much info
Recently someone has been leaving some edits on two of the Hyuga family members' pages that is not necessary, but they have yet to stop re-adding the info despite several people undoing it and telling them it is unnecessary for an intro to have all that information. I really don't know if anything can be done, but if there is something then I don't have the power to do it. User [HidanandKakazu] has left edits on Hinata's and Hanabi's Mother twice ( [one] and [two] ), and on a Hyuga Elder's page ( [one] ). The edits were corrected, but the persistence of this person is rather annoying for those of us undoing these. I'd like to hear your two cents on the on the matter since I'm a little inexperienced with this. --Souleaterevans626 (talk) 20:30, October 3, 2016 (UTC)
 * Still, I've apologized at the end of my message. --ChocolateElemental (talk) 16:09, October 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's always a good thing. It's not what I'm addressing though. Souleaterevans626 (talk) 21:04, October 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * But all in all to be honest, it's still your own decisions, I'm not going to stop you. In fact, Compression Shorts are really close to Bike Shorts in many levels, that's why I've added this info if she's either donning the other type of attire or not, even if this was additional info to begin with.
 * But again, it's still your choice if it can be accepted or not, as long as it is reasonable. Thanks for talking. --ChocolateElemental (talk) 20:13, October 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you're on about.... This is about edits someone else has been making. I have nothing to do with whatever bike shorts edit you're talking about. Souleaterevans626 (talk) 21:26, October 11, 2016 (UTC)

Jonin
In this episode they gave a time frame for how long Naruto needs to study for. They said and quote by Iruka: "Two more years of this and you will be a Jonin".

Iruka is not one to lie to his student after everything they been through.

So yeah this episode proved that in 2 years(The Last movie) Naruto becomes a Jonin.

So just update the infobox. What proof you have that Naruto is still a genin is now consider outdated information. It's like Star Trek V info when they talk about the center of the galaxy even though it is now known that in the center is a black hole.

Basically this episode confirms that Naruto becomes a Jonin in two years time and when does the events of The Last Naruto the movie take place? Two years after Naruto and Sasuke had there farewells in chapter 699.

Do or not it doesn't matter. Already all the other Naruto wikis have updated their info on Naruto since this episode aired. Stay outdated if you all want to.

--GoldLiger (talk) 13:35, October 13, 2016 (UTC)

Naruto: Uzumaki Chronicles
I saw your message. Are you sure we do not need extra details in the game? Other Naruto game articles have extra details about their plots, why can't this one? Ultimatekey (talk) 15:30, October 20, 2016 (UTC) Ultimatekey

First Naruto Game for PS Vita
Oh SuperSajuuk, many fans are thinking about First Naruto game for PlayStation Vita, is because the game called J-Stars Victory VS which was released to the PlayStation Vita it's just not the First Naruto game for PS Vita was only crossover of V-Jump the characters in Manga and Anime. Still do not know when will be the First Naruto game for PlayStation Vita? BabyKratosxZeus (talk) 15:50, October 21, 2016 (UTC)

Manga Pages
You removed a picture from Chapter 394. But Chapter 395 has a picture?--Aizaz Arif (talk) 13:12, October 30, 2016 (UTC)

Taijutsu
It has been almost half a month since I posted a topic on the Talk:Taijutsu and still there has been no response. So I request you to have a look at it and give your response. Thanks.--Aizaz Arif (talk) 13:51, October 30, 2016 (UTC)

About Lilyxflower
i noticed some recent edits Lily did on Childhood, and she is ignoring edits about the ō and ū. Will you keep an eye on Lilyxflower for me? I tried to explain about the grammar policy to, but she didn't care about the grammar... Kunoichi101 (talk) 01:32, November 4, 2016 (UTC)

re: talkpage policy
Please stop leaving untrue statements on an 'official' wikipedia. --HokageSenju (talk) 19:35, November 11, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Video abuse
No idea. I believe Wikia itself sometimes embeds videos they say are from curated sources of something. Probably something we can ask about, but other than restricting the tool to certain user groups, which I don't see them inclining to agree with, I have no idea how to curb misuse or just plain use of that functionality. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:37, November 20, 2016 (UTC)

Re: TP usage?
I leave talk page warnings when the vandalism is obvious, but small. If the vandalism is too big on a single page, or if there was no one around at the time the vandalism was made, and the vandal went through multiple articles, or multiple edits in the same article, I too block without talk page warning. I often wonder if there's any point at all in issuing warnings, since I don't recall specific instances where plain warnings deterred vandalism. At most, there are vandals who basically create an account to vandalise, and never use the account again, so the warning is essentially lost on them. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:01, November 30, 2016 (UTC)
 * Just to give my two cents: I block everyone that willingly and knowingly adds bullshit (mostly pairing shit) or removes valid information from articles. The reason for not giving these people a warning is simple: They do it on purpose. They go through the whole process of creating an account to simply make those edits. They are aware that it's wrong (or are in denial) and the wiki does not need people with that kind of mindset. If it's someone like the guy who recently added/removed video game users, I did not block him because I knew that he didn't mean any harm. But the rest comes to the wiki, shits on an article and we have to clean it up. And I'm not going to meet that with understanding and a belief in good faith. • Seelentau 愛 議 00:42, December 1, 2016 (UTC)

re: dario
Why isn't he blocked yet?--Elve Talk Page 17:56, November 30, 2016 (UTC)