<div class="quote"><i> <p>KuroiToketsuHoshi wrote: @Gold Yes. @Seel Threating gold with the use of your <i>extra buttons</i> I see. </p> </i></div>
<p>That is one vote For. </p><p>Any against? </p>

<p>Why do you really think someone's "victory" in guessing Shinki's parentage plays any role at all? We have no proof, then we don't add such an information, if we have a proof, we add information. The rest of the subject is just pointless. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>GoldLiger wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>KuroiToketsuHoshi wrote: @Gold Yes. @Seel Threating gold with the use of your <i>extra buttons</i> I see. </p> </i></div>
<p>That is one vote For. </p><p>Any against? </p> </div> <p>Wikis don't go through democracy. Everything is decided through discussion and consensus. Trust me, had to learn it the hard way >.> </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Ravenlot 27 wrote: Why do you really think someone's "victory" in guessing Shinki's parentage plays any role at all? We have no proof, then we don't add such an information, if we have a proof, we add information. The rest of the subject is just pointless. </p> </i></div>
<p>I asked for a FOR or AGAINST vote. Answer yes(for) or no(against). </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>KuroiToketsuHoshi wrote: @Gold Yes. @Seel Threating gold with the use of your <i>extra buttons</i> I see. </p><p><i>If anything of what you said gets added to the articles, I'm going to remove it. kthxbai. :^)</i>-Seel </p><p>Cant deny that threat tho. </p> </i></div>
<p>LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL. My super special extra buttons to undo an edit, that only I have and no one else, LOL. My THREAT to undo wrong information, LOLOL. If that threatens you, you probably shouldn't work in a wiki, LOLOLOLOL. </p>

<p>I don't repeat the same things twise. Your voting is meaningless at all, that's the only truth you must accept. </p>

<p>And I ask for this thread to be closed. This isn't going anywhere. Once new information come up, there's always room for them to be discussed. But not while they aren't visible to the majority. </p>

<p>^and just block the guy for being a troll. a day or two won't hurt ;) That's just my advice on it, tho. </p>

Can anyone tell me why the threat was opened again?

<p>Honestly people... </p><p>@GoldLiger Wikis are NOT battlegrounds. Stop going around saying things will "end in your victory." It's trolling that no one really cares for. </p><p>Also, this is a wiki. Wikis are never 100% correct, otherwise, there would be no need for editors. And mind you, but reverting wrong information is not a "threat." If you edit and expect that others won't revert your edits, then it's needless to edit on any wiki. Reverting is the nature of a wiki. No one's edits are special to the point where they can't be reverted (not even yours Seelentau ;P). </p><p>And wikis are not democracies. Voting on things all the time will lead to nowhere. </p>