<p>A combination attack of 2 elemental kekkei genkai sharing 1 nature was called a pseudo-kekkei tota, they could have used a triple single nature combination attack to demonstrate a pseudo kekkei tota in the context you propose, so kekkei genkai having been used for that seems intentional </p>

<p>Yes, they could've done that as well. Would've been a pseudo-kekkei tota as well, I suppose. </p>

<p>Well, combining attacks already thrown out would be sort of "3rd person", person, if you get what I'm saying. "2nd person" would be infusing elements in a rasenshuriken. "1st" person would be teaming up with two more people and having them give you their chakra to get the necessary chakra natures. and "0th" person would be combining the all your own chakra natures together and shooting them out. So, could you technically make a brand new kekkei genkai that must be replenished by forcing two separate chakra natures from two different people and forcing them into your chakra network? (Pls don't flame me) </p>

<p>I'm not exactly sure that's possible. Besides, you wouldn't create the kekkei genkai by doing so, because it wouldn't change your DNA. </p><p>I'm not flaming anyone, sorry if my posts come off as that. I'm just trying to get you all to understand the faults in your logic. The simple answer to your initial question is "There can't be a kekkei tota Sharingan because a Sharingan is a non-nature kekkei genkai, whereas a kekkei tota is a combination of three chakra natures and not a kekkei genkai. The very definitions of the words "Sharingan" and "kekkei tota" make it impossible for such a thing to exist". </p>

Ok. Then why the flip did no one except me and you realize that?

<p>I was nice enough this time to edit out your all caps message, no such thing next time, kay? </p>

<p>Oh. Sorry, I must of capped it by mistake. Sorry anyway. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>The truculent wrote: Then why the flip did no one except me and you realize that? </p> </i></div>
<p>I know I did, and I kinda answered it too. </p>

Oh. sorry

It's ok