69 Votes in Poll
Dofla
Doffy slams so bad
Hiruzen’s getting speedblitzed and cut to ribbons
It's verse equalization so speed blitzing and "slamming" (no diff) isn't a thing.
Verse equalization only equalizes energy types bro, that does not stop a speedblitz if the other character is faster.
I think you confused verse eualization with stats (or speed) equalization
What are you on about "energy types"?? No where does verse equalization imply anything about energy at all. Verse is clearly about setting the standards for both characters in stats to be we equal to each other because they're from two different verses hence where the word 'verse' is from. Idk how you misinterpreted it that bad, but that's clearly what is not intended here either way.
Apparently, you never bothered to read up the whole thing properly
Verse equalization is not stat equalization, it is about equalizing similar energy types.
Like In a verse equalized battle chakra from naruto can be treated the same as ki from dragon ball in a crossverse battle between a naruto and dragon ball characters,
So as to make matches fairer and allow abilities such as genjutsu etc. to work outside the verse.
But of course this does not make the naruto and dragon ball character equal in stats.
https://fictional-battle-omniverse.fandom.com/wiki/Verse_Equalization
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Standard_Battle_Assumptions
https://thecodex.wiki/Standard_Battle_Assumptions
Apparently, you were too hasty and made an incorrect (half-truth) conclusion on the subject of what "verse equalization" actually is even when they explain it. I actually did have prior knowledge on this unironically.
There is no subject for "stat" equalization which would just be equalization. Even in the same definitions for equalization and verse equalization they include the same thing with the excluded exception that verse equalization includes equalization, but add in verse mechanics (not energies) such as Haki and Chakra. Your own scans prove this.
This is the sole point of verse equalization. You have equalization already but you're adding verse mechanics to the subject so it's not solely mechanics their talking about. Not to mention your scans are talking about attacks as well which are outside mechanics such as Chakra, Haki, etc (any of the sort). Seems like cherry-picking to me but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
First off I need to address powers to you. Powers are self explanatory just the abilities of the characters here. When they're equalized as the definition is suggested, their level is equalized as well and this can go for special based powers or just general physical powers. It's defined as physical even if you want to properly interpret that but that's the point of a equalization.
Your third scan says the exact same thing.
Second, your whole point of it only being energies is contradicted as they quite literally say "or"... Powers or energies which powers was already elaborated on but your same information source states the exact same for equalization which is "having the same equal speed, energy, and or power". They're quite defined the same and the same.
Moving on to your vsbw scan, at the bottom it talks about equalization itself taking place alongside Verse Equalization. And the definitions you're using contextually and specifically talk about exactly what the USER sets in place for the definitions here as it should since it's my poll. I already set in place what the general concept of what verse equalization would be for this poll so you're essentially beating a dead horse.
By `powers` or `energies` all the sources specifically mean energy types as chakra, ki, or Reiatsu. This is made evident not only by the examples they cite in the pages, but also the threads they are used in all those communities.
Saying equalizing 'powers' can mean equalizing physical stats in this context is nothing more than arguing semantics.
But well if you want to redefine the whole term and assign your own meanings by trying to fit new conceptions into it, then by all means be my guest.
What do you think?