All posts by Griffith557
Cutting off Kaguya's arm is not an attack potency feat?The kamui shuriken and the kamui raikiri both negate durability. It's a feat accomplished by the means of durability negating hax and not attack potency precisely
Probably succeed
Someone has never seen Nihilus in action.Elaborate
And where do the Shinju themselves come from, their seeds? It is rather presumptuous to assume in this case, hence my delineating from the anime and novelization...Fine. I suppose Shinjus yielding an adequate harvest in a planet devoid of life and civilization is not a presumptuous assumption at all, then.
The planet is said to be "destroyed" in that same novelization, which is what I was referring to.
As to why the 'destruction of the world' cannot refer to the annihilation of the planet in that context but rather the destruction of the all life/civilization on it is something I have already gone through multiple times over. This is the last time I am going to ask it again:-
It says the 'world' had already been destroyed and yet Momoshiki is still described as being 'ON' the very same world he had destroyed. If the planet itself was annihilated how could he be still ON it?
How could a planet even host multiple Shinju to begin with? Not all mysterious of the clan are known.Sure but we do know why Shinju are planted and based on that not a single shinju would ever yield a fruit in some previously lifeless planet, let alone yield an adequate harvest.
It is the same planet in two different iterations. In one, it was a planet destroyed. In another, an orchard.Even in the novel Iteration, The planet itself wasn't destroyed, as momo was sitting on a tree stump on the same planet and eating up the shinju he had harvested from there. Also, you yourself previously accepted that otsutsuski do not literally Destroy the planets they are harvesting from, so the meaning of 'Destroying the world' in that iteration would simply mean the destruction of all life and civilization on it.
Certainly, in the anime, Momoshiki is discussing about the fruit of one tree in the orchard (no mention of anyone else there), whilst in the novelization, there is only one tree from the destroyed civilization. Not really comparable...Shinju literally are planted for the sake of sucking chakra from all life on a planet. If there was no life or civilization on it , Why would otsutsuki even be planting Shinju on it in the first place? An 'adequate harvest' from a planet would not be possible unless it previously had at least a decently advanced civilization on it
Somehow I doubt a civilization existed on a plant belonging to the clan, and the page notes the difference therein...It's very plausible that a civilization did exist and the otsutsuki later conquered it and took over it , turning it to their orchard, Especially evidenced by the way momo was talking of getting an adequate harvest from the place while sitting on it. A planet previously devoid of life or civilization would never be reaping a harvest in the first place.
The page only notes the slight difference in depiction in the two different medias. It does not treat the two as different planets as evidenced by both the depictions being applied there to the same 'Unidentified World' only.
Yes, they do not want to literally destroy the planets because they are using them to harvest. It does not mean they are unable. Nor does it mean that claims of their ability to do so are invalid because of their tendency not to.Like I already said, I was using the whole thing as an example to make the point that any statements saying that 'Character X destroyed the world' need not automatically equate to 'character X destroyed the planet' as evidenced by how Momo was simply stated to have destroyed a world by destroying all life/civilization on it and not the planet itself. Any such statements should be backed up with further elaborations or context If one wants to treat such statements to mean planetbusting.
As far as Otsutsuki are concered though. I do Agree with them Having Planetary or above AP but in terms of DC? There's no evidence. With the scale of The DC of their feats, Even if, let's say they could destroy a planet , they could only do it overtime. Or, with some sort of Hax like kaguya's ETSO.
Can't disagree with that
How many alts do you have 😭
Kakashi blitzes
The wiki does not, at least, not the same insofar that it is not a world he had destroyedI have no idea how you came to the conclusion that the wiki does not treat the two as the same when right above the paragraph you cited is this:-
//In the novelisation, it is described as a planet with russet-coloured terrain, bathed in the synchrotron radiation of a dying red sun, which produces its brilliant auroras. Rather than an apparent orchard for God Trees, the stump of the God Tree that Momoshiki harvested is located in the heart of a ruined metropolis brimming with corpses, and it notes that Momoshiki effortlessly destroyed the world, and its entire population, for no other reason than to harvest its chakra fruit. Momoshiki describes this fruit as "adequate" for a world with such a "low civilisation level".//
https://naruto.fandom.com/wiki/Unidentified_World
One can even check the footnotes for the cited sources. It couldn't get any more apparent than that.
It's pretty apparent here that world destruction is this context simply meant the destruction of all life/civilization on on it and not the destruction of the planet itself or else he wouldn't be sitting on it.
They are not going to destroy the planets they are living on, or that they wish to harvest, but one can scale up from the likes of Toneri's Moon splitting attack, or Kaguya's solar-system dimension rending attack.I Don't have a problem with upscaling otsutsukis from toneri or Kaguya. I was only using this as an example to Argue that the Kurama databook statement need not make him a planet buster.
Btw I wasn't arguing who wins this poll anyway. My only contention the whole time was that mere world destruction statements need not mean planet busting unless backed up with further elaborations, feats or context
That was not the same planet as in the anime. In the anime it is an orchard of sorts.The wiki itself says they're the same
https://naruto.fandom.com/wiki/Unidentified_World
I suppose the anime simply took the artistic liscense to display it in a slightly different way but that does not take away the fact that everything else about the scene more or less coincides with what is shown in the novel's description (and fits with the timeline of the events as well if one compares the anime and the novel)
He destroyed the planet by possibly causing the star to go super-nova.He didn't. The planet itself was still intact and as the novel itself states he was literally sitting on a tree stump on the said planet eating the chakra fruit he had harvested on it even though the said 'world' had already been destroyed as per the novel. The scene itself has been adapted in the anime as well and there is no planet busting shown there either
Additionally, It was nowhere stated or Shown in both the novel and the anime that the supernova had anything to do with momo. It simply happened to be in the backdrop of the whole thing.
Civilization/life exists across the entire planet so to turn it all to ash would be to wipe the entire planet.You don't necessarily have to destroy a planet to destroy all life or civilization on it. Surface wiping a planet is more than enough. And If it's an Otsutsuki, they technically don't even need to do that either, All they need to do is plant a God tree and that alone would devour all life on a planet and destroy any civilization residing on it.
^Momoshiki was also stated to have 'destroyed a world' even though all he did was only surface wipe the said planet planet and destroyed all life/civilization on it for the sake of harvesting chakra without actually planetbusting.
Kurama's 'turning the world to ash' statement too can be interpreted in the same light as depicting him being a threat to all civilization/life on the planet and not necessarily as him being some sort of planet buster considering the said statement lacks any further context or elaboration to back it up.
Not the movie novelization, the novelizations of the anime.Are they available to read anywhere on the internet?
They just really weak in general. We see they die to the most inconvenient characters. Idk who other guy is, but I just know Anbu weak.Not really. Rather the Anbus are simply utilized as a benchmark to show how strong the characters capable of defeating them are
The Movie Novel?
I am not really aware of any Boruto novel other than that one
If someone votes Hashirama, I’m going to be concerned.Looks like someone did
@Arcadia warlic Where is the third scan from?
Octopops gettin rekt