All posts by GokūBlack10

GokūBlack10·7/8/2016 in Naruto Series

If you haven't seen it yet, you'll want to get over to YouTube pronto. The third original soundtrack has come out and it is amazing. All of the new songs from the latest arcs, including some from the Naruto vs Sasuke arc that is coming. Plus a ton of unreleased tracks! The composer really went out of his way to make these tracks phenomenal!

(Edited by administrators)

A reply to Mecha Naruto

GokūBlack10·6/9/2016

People always call Naruto Ninja Jesus, but this episode blatantly makes Hagoromo into Jesus. Middle-aged man in sandals wondering the land preaching love and unity and shit. And his followers (initially) are a bunch of thieves and villagers? I mean, damn TV Tokyo. They didn't even try to cover that shit up >_<

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to Sarutobii2

GokūBlack10·6/2/2016

Ignoring the previews for next week, that episode was absolutely f*cking beautiful. The animations was amazing, the soundtracks were on point, and everything was just done perfectly. I loved it..

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to Sarutobii2

GokūBlack10·5/26/2016

<div class="quote"> Elveonora wrote: Again, in the manga they didn't know about Kaguya. And in the manga BZ even says they sealed the Ten-Tails, which was Kaguya, not that they sealed Kaguya and separate Ten-Tails magically turned into 9 Tailed Beasts. </div>
The anime says it too. Right when Kaguya revived, Black Zetsu notes that even Hagoromo did not know his mother and the Ten-Tails were one-in-the-same, so they've gone and contradicted their own screwy timeline. As for how we document it, I say make triva points. "In the anime, the Ten-Tails was literally the Shinju instead of Kaguya merged with the Shinju..." or something to that effect. Putting it in the actual paragraphs with the canon information would just make it confusing, especially since the anime literally changed everything.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to Gold Duck

GokūBlack10·11/3/2015

Opening Song: "Silhouette"
Ending Song: Tie between "Rainbow" and "You Can Do It"

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to Overlord Unicorn

GokūBlack10·10/19/2015

<div class="quote"> BakumatsuWarrior wrote: @Gerisama: Thanks for reminding us about the glaring timeline issues Kishi introduced when he revealed that the masked man was Obito. I think making Obito the villain was one of the biggest mistakes Kishi made in the series (along with Kaguya the Rabbit Bitch, who was a boring-ass villain). It introduced all sorts of timeline issues, along with the fact that a 13 year-old going batshit crazy for "romantic love" sounds lame as fuck. 13 year-olds boys only have crushes and masturbate to porn; they don't go around plotting the end of the world and killing their own senseis, especially if the 13 year-old in question had a very kind heart before his "crush" died. </div>
Wow, what a horribly worded and extremely one-sided opinion that is in no way truth at all. Love has caused many wars, deaths, tragedies, etc. over the course of history. Like, seriously, pick up a history book. People will do some horrible things in the name of lost love and, you'll find, most of the people who perpetrate these crimes out of lost love tend to be younger rather than older. Secondly, really? Are you inferring that Obito is unrealistic because teenage boys don't have the capacity for anything but blind lust? Have you met a teenage boy (or been one?). I'd have a hard time believing either based on your statement alone. Love is a powerful emotion and thirteen year old anybodys (boys or otherwise) are extremely impressible and easily influenced emotionally. Now, not all of them are 'shinobi' capable of destroying the world with their crazy eye powers, but there are a reason that people go crazy and do things like commit mass murder (pick your poison on how they do this), or do something as tragic as take their own lives. Forgive the harshness of this next statement, but I hate when people who have no idea what they're talking about try to be literary critics.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to Dantman

GokūBlack10·9/5/2015

Support — If there is a level-headed, trustworthy user on this site at all, it's Cerez. I'm for it if he is.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to M4ND0N

GokūBlack10·9/2/2015

Dragon Ball did the exact same thing a few years ago. It was called the Dragon Force Project where they cramed all of the non-canon anime specials into the manga timeline. Guess what? Anime specials are still non-canon. A timeline doesn't mean jack-crap unless the author themselves writes it and says: "Here's a timeline for my work". The anime company that has given us "The Year of Filler" is certainly no authority on what is canon or not. The novels are supplementary material, like the anime and like the play. That's why they exist.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to Archangel489

GokūBlack10·9/2/2015

<div class="quote"> LegionZero wrote: Can we make note of the fact that Bee told Gyuki that they should visit Naruto.... If he had all the Tailed Beasts chakra leaving the waterfall wouldn't be an issue. </div>
This is literally the poster child of a make-something-out-of-nothing argument <div class="quote"> QuakingStar wrote: The Tailed Beasts were still there, outside of any hosts when Naruto and Sasuke ended I.T. so that can't be used as proof of anything. Naruto and Sasuke are overrated, you guys love them. I get it. I never said they were weak, but they are definitely not as strong as people like to make them out to be. They each have their own Six Paths Chakra thanks to awakening the Rinnegan and SPSM, which does not mean they are just as strong as when they fought Kaguya and each other. </div>
No, it's proof. At the end of their fight, when Naruto and Sasuke are laying there in the ruins, Sasuke specifically states that if they transfer his Rinnegan to Kakashi, Naruto's Tailed Beast Chakra and the Rinnegan would undo the IT. There is no getting around it. Naruto has the beast's chakra, end of debate. It's a crack-pot theory to suggest an alternative to what has been plainly stated at least three times in the manga, two of those instances after the fight with Sasuke. And your supposition is completely ignoring the fact that the tailed beasts got released from Chibaku Tensei after IT was undone.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to M4ND0N

GokūBlack10·9/2/2015

<div class="quote"> Legendary Super Saiya-Jin 4 wrote: @Ten-Tailed Fox How do you explain the official novel timeline chart listing them in the same timeline as chapter 699, The Last, and chapter 700? </div>
You've got it backwards. The timeline is not showing how the novels fit into the manga, rather how the manga fits into the novels. It's literally just the project's way of showing where they would be. Furthermore, Kishimoto did not write that timeline. It is my understanding that at least three manga/anime companies are working on the so-called Naruto project. They commissioned the authors, they engineered the timelines, and they are calling all the shots. The only thing Kishi is doing is drawing covers for them.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to Archangel489

GokūBlack10·9/2/2015

<div class="quote"> Elveonora wrote: @Seel: our expectations were simply too high and Kishi didn't deliver, we fans put more thought into things like the lore, timeline etc. than he did. </div>
That's true of almost any fictional series, Elve. Take Star Wars for instance. Lucas only envisioned the first three movies and later expanded to six. As far as he was concerned, and he said this publicly, those six movies was all there was to Star Wars. The Expanded Universe, however, showed that fans took those six movies and made a huge universe out of them with more lore, timelines, and locations than Lucas could ever possibly imagine. And now Disney intends to take that even further. You cannot fault an author for going as far as some fans might. The author is in it to tell their story, not the story the fans want. That's true of any literature.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to Archangel489

GokūBlack10·9/2/2015

9/10 for me. There were certain points where it lost me, but I'm fairly easy to please. Naruto was a lot of fun to read, though, regardless of what others may think of it.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to M4ND0N

GokūBlack10·9/2/2015

<div class="quote"> Shock Dragoon wrote: From what I remember the Hiden (and Shiden for that matter) were worked on by the authors with heavy involvement from Kishi. So that would make them as close to canon as possible. However, it appears that they are left up to read interpretation as well so it can go either way. Regardless, given Kishi was involved with their creation doing illustrations for them, he reviewed them and gave the seal of approval, these books are as canon as we're gonna get for a Part III since the next Gen is Part IV so I'd vote "as close to canon as we can get" </div>
By the Nine, there is No. Part. III. None. It doesn't exist. It never shall. Part IV doesn't exist either. They don't. Kishi said Boruto: Naruto the Movie was the best writing he could give to the series so that pretty much confirms he's done with it. The anime could go on for the next 10 years for all we care, and there would still never be a Part III. Part I and II were named such by Kishi. Any other names are fanon. I'd also like to point out that Kishi literally wrote the plot for Road to Ninja. He had the same involvement he had in The Last. Road to Ninja isn't canon. The Last is. Even if Kishi wrote the novels himself, unless he declares it to be part of the manga continuity like he did with The Last and Boruto, they're non-canon.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to Archangel489

GokūBlack10·9/2/2015

<div class="quote"> Legendary Super Saiya-Jin 4 wrote: At the end of the Manga, Naruto and Sasuke undid Infinite Tsukuyomi, even after Sasuke stated he ran out of their chakra. Proving it regenerated, as IT cannot be undone unless both the Rinnegan (Sasuke) and the chakra of all nine tailed beasts (Naruto) is used to do so (Hagoromo stated this himself). </div>
Bingo. Someone finally caught on. Let's review, shall we:

Sasuke never said he ran out of their chakra. In fact, the only reference that was made to chakra levels was Kurama saying that Naruto was running on empty in general.
Hagoromo stated that Naruto would serve as the meeting place for the Beasts and the catalyst of this is their chakra. The entire reason Yang Kurama agreed to be put back inside Naruto was because he was to serve as their meeting place's overseer.
Hagoromo, Sasuke, and Naruto all confirmed that the Beasts' chakras and the Rinnegan were required to undo IT, which Naruto helped with at the end of the war: confirming he still had their power then.

Case in point: He still has all of their chakra. As to the Six Paths Sage Mode, I don't think anyone can conclusively say whether he does or doesn't have it anymore. Naruto's cloak changes almost everytime we see it. You hear people say the eyes are proof of the mode because of the databook, you have people say the markings on his back are the proof because the manga showed it when Madara named the technique, and yet others claim that the presence (or lack thereof) of the TSB is the key to it all. I say no one knows what they're talking about. Here's how I view it. Naruto can still use SPSM. Why? Sasuke can still use the Rinnegan, that's why. The power Hagoromo gave them, save the Chibaku Tensei seals, did not go away. But, just like Goku can become a regular Super Saiyan despite the fact that he can go all the way up to God mode now, Naruto can also use his lesser cloaks. Just because he can use Six Paths Sage Mode doesn't mean that it is an automatic transformation and the moment he transforms he has to be in said mode. But wait! I have proof of said claim. During Naruto's battle with Momoshiki, there comes a moment where he temporarily uses a Version 1 cloak to shield himself. Why would he use that if he could just turn into Kurama's head, or go Six Paths Sage Mode and defend himself that way? Either A) because he didn't have enough chakra or B) because he didn't want to. Either way, this proves he can use lesser forms despite having more advanced forms. /rant

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to QuakingStar

GokūBlack10·8/31/2015

Could have been that when he was born, only a portion of Kurama's chakra escaped her seal and, rather than re-seal it back into her, Konoha opted for two jinchuriki and stuffed the thing in the child.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to Seelentau

GokūBlack10·8/27/2015

The point, I think, that was being made, Dantman, is that we cannot definitively say their information is false. Some people have seen the movie and some have not, but the movie is officially released and therefore does not fall under the spoiler policy. We must assume good faith that the people that saw the movie are recording the information as accurately as possible. I don't see the benefit, nor the fairness, in removing their information purely on the basis that some have not yet seen/have the ability to see the movie. If a new Star Wars movie were to come out, for instance, Wookiepedia would not wait until something was posted online for everyone to view before updating their wiki. That'd be preposterous. There is nothing that makes us so special that we have to do things any differently. The Spoiler policy states that information should not be added to the site until the source is officially released. Boruto: Naruto the Movie is out. Therefore they are not in any violation of policy and are, in fact, aiding our wiki by adding information many of us cannot yet. Any corrections, minor or otherwise, can be made when other have in fact seen the movie and can provide other edits. In the meantime, deletion of that content is counterproductive.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to Seelentau

GokūBlack10·8/27/2015

<div class="quote"> Cerez365 wrote: We should trust the information that they are adding is true but still apply the wiki standards to it: subsume the information that are being created in random unnamed articles to their main articles where possible. There's no reason to not believe that what they are adding isn't true just because some of us cannot verify what others are adding. After all, far worse has been added to the wikia and had to be changed. </div>
I believe that is called a "good faith" policy and it is how all Wikias operate. I'm with Cerez on this one, folks.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to NeedleJizo

GokūBlack10·8/16/2015

Oppose — I generally look to Star Wars Wiki in instances like this. Their policy is, we Wikia wikis aren't Wikipedia. We cover one topic, series, etc, so there is no reason why we can't have articles, however small they may be, on the topics presented in the series. Characters, techniques, anything like that. I'm very much against taking the Bleach Wiki approach and just shoving everything "minor" into a single page. There's no reason for that. It isn't like we're hurting for space.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to NewGenToneri

GokūBlack10·8/14/2015

I concur: her enemy was Frieza and the enemy never came because our friendly neighborhood Super Saiyans weren't havin' any of that.

(Edited by GokūBlack10)

A reply to Seelentau

GokūBlack10·7/18/2015

<div class="quote"> Yalocalsupahero wrote: I always thought that the "The" came from the grammatically correct usage of proper titles/nouns in English. As in both parts are proper specific titles and singular. There is only one "Sage", and only one set of "Six Paths". The fact that we don't really know what these paths are doesn't make them improper or pronouns. Sort of like "Barack Obama is The President of The United States of America". One president which is a formal title, one United States which is a proper noun. </div>
"Barack Obama is President of the United States" is also grammatically correct depending on the context. And Tau has a point; going by that rule, Hagoromo would be "the Sage of the Six Paths".

(Edited by GokūBlack10)