Note: This topic has been unedited for 4118 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
Whether or not a topic is notable enough to have its own article has been a problem for this wiki for several years. There have been numerous discussions about it, sometimes to determine the notability of one topic, other times to determine the notability of several unrelated but similar topics. These discussions rarely go anywhere because the wiki has no firm definition of what is and isn't notable. Without this sort of guideline people end up basing their decisions on existing articles and inconsistency reigns.
It is time the wiki set some notability criteria.
Statements
Read the following statements. Consider each statement and evaluate it on its own. Then, for each statement, indicate whether you agree or disagree by signing (~~~~) under the corresponding heading. Try not to be neutral. Try not to abstain. If you change your mind, strike (do not remove) previous !votes. Please hold comments until the end.
Exists
“
A topic is notable by virtue of its existence.
”
Agree
Disagree
Name
“
A topic is notable if it has been properly named.
”
Agree
Disagree
Title
“
A topic is notable if, although it has not been properly named, it has a unique in-universe title or description.
”
Agree
Disagree
Relation
“
A topic is notable if, although it has not been properly named, it can easily be described in terms of a named topic. Ex: "X's mother" or "Y's ability".
”
Agree
Disagree
Description
“
A topic is notable if all that is known about it cannot reasonably be conveyed in an article that is likely to link to it.
”
Agree
Disagree
Appear 2
“
A topic is automatically notable if it has appeared on at least 2 separate occasions.
”
Agree
Disagree
Appear 3
“
A topic is automatically notable if it has appeared on at least 3 separate occasions.
”
Agree
Disagree
Databook
“
A topic is NOT notable if it appeared in the manga and the databook for that portion of the series did not give it special mention.
”
Agree
Disagree
Dialogue 1
“
A character is automatically notable if they have had at least 1 line of dialogue.
”
Agree
Disagree
Dialogue 3
“
A character is automatically notable if they have had at least 3 lines of dialogue.
”
Agree
Disagree
Dialogue 5
“
A character is automatically notable if they have had at least 5 lines of dialogue.
”
Agree
Disagree
Unique
“
An ability, item, or group is notable if its uniqueness cannot reasonably be argued.
”
Agree
Disagree
Discussion
All contributors to the wiki are welcomed to weigh in with their opinions. On January 23 the discussion will be closed and a standard will be drawn from the views expressed. Once this standard is agreed upon, all existing and future articles will be expected to live up to that standard.
The results of this forum are most likely to affect the articles listed below. You may wish to examine the list to decide where exactly you draw the line with notability.
If you have anything to discuss, please do so below. Please also suggest new statements that would be useful in formulating a guideline or ways in which existing statements can be clarified/improved. ~SnapperTo 01:12, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
Post