This page is an archive. Please do not edit this archive, instead try editing the page this archive originated from.

This page is an archive of requests from Project:Sysop Requests. The purpose is to keep a record of all requests, but without clogging the actual request page. Please do not edit this page.

Protection-related requests

Deletion-related requests

  • {{Sharinganwiki}}: Created without consensus, talkpage appears to be going ignored regarding the matter. It's not used on any pages and should be recreated in a better format if it is necessary and with a consensus. --Sajuuk [Mod] 19:03, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • User:SuperSajuuk: Blanking userpages violates the policy. The page cannot be tagged because it is protected. Idrinktearsforsupper (talk) 08:17, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
    • It has a long page history and does not need to be deleted. Unless you want to have thousands of redlinks all over the wiki. --SuperSajuuk (talk) 08:27, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
      • Then consider this request as obsolete, I misunderstood the policies. Idrinktearsforsupper (talk) 08:45, July 8, 2015 (UTC)

Blocking-related requests

  • RexGodwin Constantly revert warring over a minor detail in this image for no reason, when nobody else seems to care. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 13:17, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
    • Obviously people seem to care enough if a on and off revert war commenced. Not to mention had a discussion went down I would have gone with his edit as Shikamaru's head isn't really necessary. This is more of a "A discussion should be had" and not "block RexGodwin for not agreeing with someone".--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 13:23, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
      • Rex's sole contributions as of late is to edit war over the cropping of pictures. Considering he simply ignores other users and reverts without giving reasons, I would consider this vandalism and unproductive edit count boosting. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 13:29, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
        • He likes to focus on images. See no issue with that. Regardless, I would rather wait and see if he actively ignores discussions made then just block him outright. If you'd rather see what other sysops have to say or simply do it yourself (As I know you are capable of, so this little pony show confuses me.) is up to you. But my personal stance is, if he wants the image chaged or cropped or whatever he or others can bring up a discussion. Only when images are straight up changed for no reason (Like Obito's was a few months back) would images require this much hooplah.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 13:35, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
          • That is true, I will wait. And I only step in to an issue if there are no sysops around or it's blatant vandalism. Especially as this is in the file namespace, I would prefer sysops to deal with it first. (I've cleaned up the page, archived a lot of stuff and moved the header to a subpage) --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 13:38, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
  • Munchvtec - Acting like a kid every time things don't go his way, as can be seen here. His only contributions are constantly editing talkpages (despite being told by multiple users to stop doing) so he needs a timeout. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 14:21, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
    • Bumping for attention, also Munchvtec seems to have attitude issues by believing that he doesn't need to listen to editors unless all sysops tell him to stop doing whatever other editors are telling him to stop doing and also appears to be a magnet for trolls to come here and instigate reactions from him (because they know he will reply and not ignore them). There's also the issue that I reported to Snapper2 in which he seems to have an obsession with formatting every talkpage on the wiki which isn't necessary. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 14:28, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
      • SuperSajuuk has refused all of my questions as to what exactly it is im doing wrong. If he's talking about the formatting on talk pages then i also see no issue with me doing that. For the troll thing, yes i do attract ONE vandal but when he comes i kindly ask him to leave and if not then i rarely speak at all. He says that 2 users asked me to stop. those two users are him and snapper2. snapper2 asked me not to delete talk page edits to which i have not done since he asked. If all this warrants a block then wow. Munchvtec (talk) 15:35, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
        • You are going to have to give me more reasons than that. I have no seen him remove Talk Page edits, but if he was asked to stop and he did stop then fandidilytastic. In the discussion you did link, he did nothing wrong but to call one person for trying to dismiss his and Rachin123's opinion.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 15:43, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
          • I have asked him to stop going around talkpages and formatting them on a number of occasions now, because it is totally unnecessary but he believes that, unless someone other than me or Snapper2 tells him to stop as well, he can reasonably ignore the requests.
          • There's also the fact that he seems incapable of ignoring trolls and has been told quite a lot of times by people to stop doing this.
          • I don't actually see the user contributing meaningfully to the wiki, going around editing "ancient" talkpages just to format them is pointless.
          • I do believe that users have been blocked in the past (even recently) when they are showing no interest in listening to requests of other editors about their editing practices, I have told Munchvtec a lot of times to stop making pointless edits and he continues anyway, believing that it's fine to ignore editors if it's just the same ones complaining.
          • You can see some examples of the pointless edits he is currently making here: User_talk:Snapper2#request. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 15:52, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
            • Are all of my edits worthless sajuuk or are you only pointing out talk page ones. i do do other work. Munchvtec (talk) 15:54, March 18, 2015 (UTC)

(Edit!Conflict!Yay!)Further, if this is the formatting you seem to have issue with, then at least in my humble opinion, he should be commended for such. Yes it is not much and probably unnecessary, but they it is by no means a bad edit. In fact, having the section in the talk page properly titled and what not is a good thing and I would welcome him to continue if he believes it will help the wiki.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 15:55, March 18, 2015 (UTC)

  • Also Munchvtec, as you can see I am speaking in your favor. Try not to undermine that by trying to speak for yourself.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 16:00, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • Daniel Bailey. I already blocked him for being a sockpuppet and evading an existing block, I'm simply placing this here for other sysops to confirm if I am correct. His edits have included: junk trivia ("stating the obvious", which he did constantly on his main account), adding overly descriptive and sometimes unneeded appearance sections, despite being asked to stop, ignoring editor requests via his talkpage and being involved in vandalism. Oh, and there's the fact it's a sockpuppet account which he uses whenever his main one is blocked, which goes against the sockpuppet policy anyway. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 20:49, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
Seams ok to me. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:38, March 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • Javious.armani -- Ignoring the Manual of Writing Style Kunoichi101 (talk) 04:41, April 24, 2015 (UTC)
    • I'm pretty sure that sysops have told you that this does not warrant a block. Also, stop being so quick to report users to be blocked, unless they're obvious vandals. EDIT: I stand corrected. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 07:27, April 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • AngelOfDeath1395: I blocked him for being a sockpuppet for User:AngelOfDeath1295, based on the user's name. As with a previous block above, feel free to check and confirm. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 08:56, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
    • Leaving a record here that the user in question decided to harass me on my YouTube channel, demanding that I lower his block on the sockpuppet because it was apparently "harsh", despite being told several times that it would not be lowered. His messages to me simply confirmed that he made a sockpuppet account to bypass a block. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 21:49, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • RexGodwin Unnecessary and unneeded edit warring over pictures, despite several warnings to stop this behaviour. I have been told the user does this on every single wiki he visits and disrupts their communities by acting like the only pics that should be used are his own and he appears to revert war whenever people revert his unwanted changes. It has already gotten several pictures sysop locked in the past couple of months and I'm sick of dealing with him. Recommending a block of at least 3 months. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 08:38, May 22, 2015 (UTC)
  • Fairy Tail Dragon Slayer: continuously "raping" Sarada's talk page with his anger issues and ignores the warnings he is given, even by the sysops.--Omojuze (talk) 15:47, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  • OmerAGilin - Spamming duplicate files, uploaded a fanon pic and ignoring talkpage requests to stop. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 13:36, June 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • ZéACNS - Ignoring warnings and adding false information in the articles.--Omojuze (talk) 19:28, June 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • Uranerd --Cerez365Hyūga Symbol(talk) 09:25, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
  • Paladin78 - repeated fanon information in articles, like here, |here, etc... (This shouldn't been done months ago.) Also, I know that grammar mistakes aren't ban-worthy, but from someone who is claiming to be from the US, it just boggles my mind. I really hope a sysop could do something about this, and as soon as possible.--Omojuze (talk) 19:28, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
    • I blocked him for the Guy edit after he made it. This most recent batch of edits seems motivated by an over-desire to document the myriad number of things that are "unknown", which at the moment doesn't seem a blockable offense. Will reconsider if he persists. ~SnapperTo 18:30, July 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • Paladin78 - Again he is adding speculation and fanon to characters and technique articles. He's been warned following his last ban and despite it, chosen to ignore requests about his editing habits and has continued adding bizarre things to articles. Warning him doesn't accomplish anything so could he be banned and for longer this time? --Sarutobii2 (talk) 20:29, August 25, 2015 (UTC)
  • XxSakura.uzumaki For changing Hinata's introduction with false reasoning over and over again despite being warned not to do it. Norleon (talk) 12:48, August 27, 2015 (UTC)
  • Sasusakuchiha A short-term block for ignoring the wiki's rules even when being told to follow them. A Wkia contributor (talk) 12:46, September 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • Paladin78 Creates fake articles without a legitimate source, even when asked. Not the first offense, not the second, so this was honestly expected. (Well they are thought to be fake, they might end up to be truthful, but he refuses to deliver a source)--Omojuze (talk) 16:56, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
    • "Adding the name of a character from the Naruto: Mission: Protect The Hidden Waterfall Village! (novel)"
      Isn't this a source? ~SnapperTo 18:58, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
      • The novel is not translated online, he didn't share a scan of the novel where the character was mentioned either. Just because he said it's from the novel, doesn't mean it's the truth, given he's been adding fanon stuff here before. Don't want to sound pessimistic, but I'm very distrustful with him and he refuses to provide an actual valid source, Saru asked him for one.--Omojuze (talk) 19:23, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
        • Hisen
          ~SnapperTo 19:30, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
          • Ok. And the kanji he's adding are from?--Omojuze (talk) 19:40, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
            • I dunno. Viz's translation of the manga gives the Japanese for the cast, maybe they do the same for the books they translate?
              If you find something dubious and can find no supporting evidence, you are free to remove it. ~SnapperTo 20:31, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
              • Ok, at this point it's blatant vandalism, is it not? Don't know 'bout you Snapper, but I'm not willing to clean all this mess up, and I'm not the only one who's annoyed with him either. I don't know where's the reluctance to block people is coming from, but I personally don't like it...--Omojuze (talk) 21:13, October 9, 2015 (UTC)
  • Please trade me For changing this article's "artefact" to the US version nine times in total, despite being warned multiple times by multiple editors, three times even on his talkpage. The last edit indicated that he's merely trolling, hence a block would be wise in this case. A Wkia contributor (talk) 15:04, October 4, 2015 (UTC)
  • BurgerAlison or Zheng Yusuf for breaking the sockpuppet policy (refer to this message I made on BurgerAlison's talkpage). Since I don't know which account was made first, I reported both. If a sysop can track the first account, the other one can be blocked infinitely. A Wkia contributor (talk) 03:55, October 7, 2015 (UTC)
  • Ur nan For being a sockpuppet of the blocked user above "Please trade me". Given the recent "quality" of his/her edits, I would recommend a very long block. A Wkia contributor (talk) 01:04, October 13, 2015 (UTC)
  • Shayboi808 For changing a jutsu description into a low quality one with an inappropriate word included into it and then changing that into a link for his youtube channel, calling each act of vandalism "more detail".--Umishiru (talk) 03:41, October 26, 2015 (UTC)
  • Paladin78 For adding unnecessary edits and fanon translations to articles he has created. --JouXIII (talk) 21:13, November 4, 2015 (UTC)
  • Boredfan1 Keeps removing people's posts in jutsu talk pages. Don't if it is being done in an attempt to silence criticism or does know how to use talk pages properly. Regardless, was warned not to do it again, and proceeded to do so again. He has done it 3 times so far was warned twice. --Umishiru (talk) 06:26, November 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • GoldLiger Threatens other users with their position. If not a ban, then a severe warning.--Ghostrick142 (talk) 20:31, January 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • KyofuFuma For vandalising Fūma Clan page. --JouXIII (talk) 04:24, January 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • Djghostface292 For his repeated unwanted edits on the Uchiha Clan Downfall article and then insulting myself when i addressed the issue on his talk page. --Bio havik (talk) 06:25, January 10, 2016 (UTC)
  • Ghostrick142 Sockpuppet account of Omojuze. Used both accounts in an article deletion discussion to appear more users supported it staying. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 15:58, January 14, 2016 (UTC)
    • You mean the response that was left towards you? K. Anyways, if you want to have a ban, I'd rather have the old account banned, I won't be using it regardless, ban or no ban.--Ghostrick142 (talk) 17:00, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

Forum-related requests

  • Thread:176952: Blatant spam/advertising. Please delete them (More -> Remove (give no reason) -> Delete (give reason as "spam/advertising"). Based on these spam posts, the user should probably be blocked for spamming/advertising.Would have done it myself, but circumstances... --Sajuuk 16:54, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
  • requesting thread 183847#29 to be closed as threat got off topic and users are insulting other users calling them dumb or misinformed —This unsigned comment was made by Actionmanrandell (talkcontribs) .


Move requests

  • Water Release: Great Waterfall Flow to "Water Release: Great Waterfall Flow Technique" (It was incorrectly named).--Omojuze (talk) 17:29, September 12, 2015 (UTC)
  • Team 2 to Team Two Kunoichi101 (talk) 21:33, November 18, 2015 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

  • I'd like any sysop to keep an eye on User:Kunoichi101. I don't think the reasons need to be spelled out in great detail, but I'm sick of her constantly making pointless edits. She has god-knows-how-many warnings to stop, even a recent block doesn't seem to faze her whatsoever. If she continues to make these edits, I would like a sysop to step in and just block her for a very long time. She ignores editors, she continues to make useless edits and she does not contribute in any way to improving the wiki. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 22:11, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
    • Honest question. What exactly about her edits are bad? I have never actually gotten the amount of aggro her edits.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 23:59, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
      • She is not contributing. Her edits are just minor little things that don't change the page's appearance. She thinks that she's doing it in the course of the manual of style, but the thing is... that's all she does. She doesn't actually improve the content, she just keeps making edits that violate the policy of "don't make edits that don't change the page's appearances".
      • As WindStar7125 pointed out, she has been told nearly 50 times to stop and not one of the 50 warnings makes a single damn impression: she continues despite the warnings. I would encourage you (or any other sysop reading this) to start at her first archive and just read through them all and you can see that she has, over the course of 7 years, received a huge number of "stop making X edit" warnings by literally tons of people (me, Simant, UltimateSupreme, Snapper2, Fmakck, yourself, the list goes on), which she has so far demonstrated she couldn't care about.
      • Honestly, she should have been infinitely blocked a LONG time ago, she does nothing more than harm the wiki with constant edit warring (in which she always violates Revert policy, ignoring talkpage requests and overall not contributing. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 08:47, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
        • Acknowledged. Gotta love my shoddy memory. Will watch more closely, keep my posted. But be sure to not make this a witch hunt. If you see faulty edits report them to me and I'll look into it, don't get into fights in talk pages that just means I can't do much.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 10:53, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
          • Not making it a witch hunt and I don't plan on getting into talkpage fights either with her, I will report every bad edit she makes (I'll also advise WindStar7125 and other active rollbacks to do the same). Don't see why we need to put up with it any more. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 12:45, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
  • Boruto Uzumaki: The page is blocked. Please, can someone add this picture in "Appearance" with the description: "Boruto in Naruto Gaiden"? Narsha | Talk
  • Add Sarada Uchiha as a member of Team Konohamaru, her infobox is locked from editing. Thank you.--Omojuze (talk) 11:16, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • Calling on the sysops to keep an eye on an editor. Based on this edit, they're likely to create a lot of redundant articles with no care for how we do things here. If they spam pages, I request the user to be blocked from the wiki, preferably indefinitely. They're just causing hassle for us and don't seem to care. --Sajuuk 20:10, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
    • Could something be done about Paladin78? All his edits are either junk or unsourced speculation. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 22:15, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
Boruto: Naruto the Movie -- There are two Yuruis one was Yurui (anime) and the other Yurui. Kunoichi101 (talk) 08:06, November 24, 2015 (UTC)
Haven't a clue how to do that. Or why it even shows up because the second Yurui isn't even in the movie.--TheUltimate3 Akimichi Symbol (talk) 11:55, November 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • Is it possible this page could be restored? It was deleted because it was considered "fanon", but now there's a name for the technique (that's pretty much the exact same). WindStar7125 Divine Mangekyō Sharingan VolteMetalic 05:26, December 7, 2015 (UTC)
  • Can "Tools Creation at Will" be re-named to "Tool Creation Technique" per talk page discussion? --Bio havik (talk) 01:15, January 7, 2016 (UTC)
  • SierraGust - Letting the sysops know this now in regards to this user: If you look carefully at each and every contribution this user has made, you'll notice that all edits are tagged with (Mobile) on them. This means that this user is using the mobile skin to make edits, which is a problem. Wikia's mobile skin does not allow usage of Special:WikiActivity to see edits, and since it's highly unlikely that the user will come across Special:RecentChanges (due to there being no link to there on the mobile skin) this user is unable to see user requests through edit summaries telling the user to stop with the edits. Also, when you edit this user's talkpage, the mobile skin will not give the user a notice telling them his or her talkpage has been edited. To be concise, what I'm saying is that SierraGust has been editing while being blissfully unaware of what others are telling him or her due to the mobile skin not allowing them to see user requests. Just thought I'd let you know, because it's likely that this user will continue with the edits no matter what anyone says due to not knowing someone is telling him or her to stop in the first place. WindStar7125 Divine Mangekyō Sharingan VolteMetalic 06:30, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
    • If it ever becomes a problem, a temp block would have to be used with link to the talkpage in the reason--~UltimateSupreme 16:53, January 21, 2016 (UTC)
      • A temp block because he's not able to see his warnings is not justified. Bring it up in his Talk Page first. Still makes mistakes then deal with it.--TheUltimate3 Akimichi Symbol (talk) 01:19, January 22, 2016 (UTC)