Itachi's Lover
Obito mentioned Itachi had a lover. Was it her?Cloudtheavenger (talk) 23:55, September 19, 2015 (UTC)
- Until the book is released, we don't know. --JouXIII (talk) 23:58, September 19, 2015 (UTC)
- If they were lovers, wouldn't that be incest? Itachi and Izumi were part of the same clan.Lilixflower (talk 24:02, September 19, 2015 (UTC)
- In Japan, I believe that it's only taboo if the relationship is with siblings. First cousins are already game. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:36, September 20, 2015 (UTC)
- Flower, by that definition, any breeding we do is incest. We're all from a common ancestor. Being a bio major, I don't exactly know what the cut-off is for it to not be considered incest, but in the end, once our genetic codes become distinct enough, we can have children without it being incest.Cloudtheavenger (talk) 03:44, September 20, 2015 (UTC)
- In Japan, I believe that it's only taboo if the relationship is with siblings. First cousins are already game. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:36, September 20, 2015 (UTC)
- If they were lovers, wouldn't that be incest? Itachi and Izumi were part of the same clan.Lilixflower (talk 24:02, September 19, 2015 (UTC)
I think it is said that she has feelings for him but he can't understand and/or answer them. Oh and I also think Izumi's family left the clan and they came back later or so... • Seelentau 愛 議 07:46, September 20, 2015 (UTC)
Fanmade
This isn't Masashi Kishimoto, he hasn't confirmed and a lot have said, he hasn't wrote this. It's just fanmade.—This unsigned comment was made by NinjaWarrior10 (talk • contribs) .
- Read the light novels mate. Also remember to sign your edits with the four tildes (~) (UTC)) Munchvtec (talk) 18:41, November 16, 2015 (UTC)
Novel vs Anime
Novel is canon, anime adaption is not. So why exactly are we putting the novel version of Izumi's death in Other media? --Mandon (talk) 16:46, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
- Cause novel ain't canon. • Seelentau 愛 議 18:02, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
- novels are canon lol.--AskinNakkLeVaar (talk) 20:55, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
- Not done by Kishimoto = not canon, until they are specifically said to be such (like the Boruto series.)--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 20:57, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
- But it was even said in the manga that Itachi killed her, supporting the novel version.--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 21:04, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
- ^Was it? What chapter and page? --Rai 水 (talk) 21:07, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
- I believe it was after Itachi vs. Sasuke when Obito said that Itachi killed his girlfriend. Is that what you mean, Elveonora?--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 21:10, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
- Why does everyone think that just because Kishimoto does something, it's canon? Kishimoto designed the Susanoo from the games, that doesn't make them canon.
- And no, the manga said "lover", not "girlfriend". Itachi could've been gay, for all we know. • Seelentau 愛 議 21:12, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
- Why does everyone think that just because Kishimoto does something, it's canon? Kishimoto designed the Susanoo from the games, that doesn't make them canon.
- I believe it was after Itachi vs. Sasuke when Obito said that Itachi killed his girlfriend. Is that what you mean, Elveonora?--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 21:10, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
- ^Was it? What chapter and page? --Rai 水 (talk) 21:07, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
- But it was even said in the manga that Itachi killed her, supporting the novel version.--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 21:04, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
- Not done by Kishimoto = not canon, until they are specifically said to be such (like the Boruto series.)--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 20:57, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
- novels are canon lol.--AskinNakkLeVaar (talk) 20:55, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
^ o.O Why wouldn't that just fufill people's fantasy. --Rai 水 (talk) 21:16, April 9, 2016 (UTC)
Oh for crying out loud.. this is such an oxymoron. If the wikia consensus is that the novels aren't canon, then why are they treated as such on the wiki? I'm of course referring to Naruto and Hinata's wedding in the Last being detailed by the novel's perspective, rather than the movie. In any case, this is merely an adaption of the novels. Canon or not, the adaptation shouldn't take priority over the source material on the page. --Mandon (talk) 03:03, April 10, 2016 (UTC)