FANDOM


(Necessity)
(Necessity)
Line 30: Line 30:
 
:::::Oh lawdy... Techniques is an entirely different argument.--[[User talk:Cerez365|Cerez<sub>365</sub>™]][[File:Hyūga Symbol.svg|20px]] 00:43, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
:::::Oh lawdy... Techniques is an entirely different argument.--[[User talk:Cerez365|Cerez<sub>365</sub>™]][[File:Hyūga Symbol.svg|20px]] 00:43, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
::Should we start a talk about ''that'' then? [[User:Yatanogarasu|Yatanogarasu]] ([[User_talk:Yatanogarasu|Talk]]) 00:52, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
::Should we start a talk about ''that'' then? [[User:Yatanogarasu|Yatanogarasu]] ([[User_talk:Yatanogarasu|Talk]]) 00:52, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
  +
  +
In a way, I'm going to have to agree that articles such as this are meaningless. But that leads to questions on articles such as [[Okyō]] and [[Inaho]]. There isn't any difference concerning the amount of information between those two and this one. It basically becomes a policy decision:
  +
# Do characters without a name get an article? → No.
  +
# Do characters with a name provided by a databook get an article? → Discuss!
  +
# Do characters with a name provided within the manga or anime get an article? → Yes.
  +
Names provided by the databooks are a bit tricky. On the one hand, databooks provide useful information, on the other hand articles such as [[Okyō]] and [[Inaho]] are completely useless.--[[User:Joolushko Tunai Fenta Hovalis|Joolushko Tunai Fenta Hovalis]] ([[User talk:Joolushko Tunai Fenta Hovalis|talk]]) 13:32, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:32, February 28, 2012

Necessity

So you know, since we're cleaning up the wikia(sorta), I propose we delete this article.

  1. She says absolutely nothing in the movie not even emotive sounds
  2. She mimics Shabadaba's facial expressions and gestures most of the times
  3. Her greatest role is apparently bringing Shababdaba(lolz name) a dish of fruit.
  4. She is 'ideous.

--Cerez365Hyūga Symbol 19:31, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

On a weird question: why does she have the same infobox image as Shabadaba? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:44, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

I was just gonna ask that Omni. Maybe it's Shabadaba's shadow clone XD --speysider (talk) 19:45, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
Uhm ._. she was in the background of the first one but then I uploaded an image of him alone in the frame with the intention of grabbing one for her, then this revelation hit me...--Cerez365Hyūga Symbol 19:46, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, that's why I used Shabadaba's picture for the infobox. I didn't upload an entire picture of herself. But if we're gonna delete this one, why not, even though we do have something like Orochimaru's Previous Body and Iwagakure Bodyguard, both of whom says absolutely nothing and made only made incredibly minor appearances. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 19:57, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
I think this wiki should only have articles for main, major and characters who actually speak. Those that are just background characters or have absolutely no relevance to the outcome of the plot should be deleted (eg, like this article and those Yatanogarasu linked to --speysider (talk) 19:59, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, I have to agree that we have gone too far with these conjectural-characters. Time to smarmy up and wipe them off, right? Yatanogarasu (Talk) 20:14, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

Why does everyone always attack the Iwa bodyguard when he looks so kewl Q_Q In time it could be deleted as well but my attention was drawn to her...--Cerez365Hyūga Symbol 20:16, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

They should all be deleted. I was getting tired of characters with little importance getting articles.--Deva 27 20:32, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

I agree, along with all the jutsu and tools/weapons that go unnamed. The point is, it gets a place only if it has an official name. That reminds me, what about Shield of Black Flames and Mirage Genjutsu, they have a kanji name, but seems unofficial.
But that aside, should we move this talk to a forum? Yatanogarasu (Talk) 23:03, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

I think you guys are going a bit too overboard for something that's just for one entirely unnecessary article. There are unnamed articles that have purpose. If they should all be removed, a couple Kage for instance would be gone... Shield of Black Flames and Mirage Genjutsu are descriptive names. They're unnmaed but somewhere in the manga/whatever medium they got a description that is used for the article name.--Cerez365Hyūga Symbol 23:13, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

I agree. I'm not against all unnamed articles--Deva 27 23:23, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
Alright, how about just the ones that seem too minor, like a simple dagger or something with no significant value? But as for the characters, all unnamed ones are going, right, except the Kage , as they all have numerical prefix, like First Tsuchikage, Fourth Kazekage, or people with titles, like Aniki, Wind Daimyo? Yatanogarasu (Talk) 00:47, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
I agree, let's just get rid of articles that have too little information to go on for requiring an article. They could be mentioned in like their main article (in the case of Orochimaru's Previous Host) --speysider (talk) 08:39, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
Yes, and while we're on the subject, let's delete something like Earth Release: Earth Shaking Palm. I mean, Jirobo just slammed his fist on the ground, it wasn't particularly a technique, Lee could kick the ground and cause it to shake and shatter. Yatanogarasu (Talk) 00:38, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
Oh lawdy... Techniques is an entirely different argument.--Cerez365Hyūga Symbol 00:43, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
Should we start a talk about that then? Yatanogarasu (Talk) 00:52, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

In a way, I'm going to have to agree that articles such as this are meaningless. But that leads to questions on articles such as Okyō and Inaho. There isn't any difference concerning the amount of information between those two and this one. It basically becomes a policy decision:

  1. Do characters without a name get an article? → No.
  2. Do characters with a name provided by a databook get an article? → Discuss!
  3. Do characters with a name provided within the manga or anime get an article? → Yes.

Names provided by the databooks are a bit tricky. On the one hand, databooks provide useful information, on the other hand articles such as Okyō and Inaho are completely useless.--Joolushko Tunai Fenta Hovalis (talk) 13:32, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.