Infobox image

Why are we still using the fatass Bulbasaur form? We know its true form is the "Third form", as thats what was seen in the flashbacks of Hagoromo, when Madara recreated it in a complete state, and when Kaguya reverted to it after being hit by Chibaku Tensei. --RexGodwin (talk) 22:20, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Bump.--RexGodwin (talk) 06:05, August 1, 2015 (UTC)

Agree with this, especially since the current picture screws up its trademark eye. Anyone else?--BeyondRed (talk) 22:53, August 15, 2015 (UTC)
We're using the "fatass Bulbasaur form" in the info box because we generally use an image depicting the first appearance of the character. --Sarada Uzumaki (talk) 23:00, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

Incorrect Background info

Not really sure where to post this, since I've seen this on this page, Hagoromo, and Hamura's pages. So I'll just go ahead and post it here. "In the final battle between the Ten-Tails and Kaguya's sons, Hagoromo and Hamura, they managed to defeat the beast and sealed it within Hagoromo, making him the first jinchūriki. This act, along with many other great deeds throughout his lifetime, resulted in Hagoromo becoming revered as the "Sage of the Six Paths". However, knowing that his death would unleash the Ten-Tails back into the world to continue its rampage and reclaim the chakra he had spread among humanity, Hagoromo separated the monster's chakra from its body and used his Creation of All Things ability to create the nine tailed beasts. Hagoromo then used Chibaku Tensei to seal the Ten-Tails' husk in what would become the moon.[5][6]"

They sealed her with, which is what created the Moon with the husk being used as it's core. Just like when Naruto and Sasuke used it a thousand years later to do the same exact thing. Hamura departed with the rest of the Otsutsuki Clan to the Moon after the Ten-Tails' husk was sealed into what became known as the Moon. With Hagoromo having Asura and Indra many years later, and we know what happens beyond that point. Hamura's page cites the fourth databook when it says this, and Hagoromo said that he had his sons afterwards himself.

When Hagoromo appears himself and talks about things, he never says anything about surviving the extraction of the Ten-Tails' chakra due to him having it's husk within him. As that wouldn't make sense, since it's husk is in the Moon which Hamura and the clan left to guard many years ago. Only Madara, Obito, and Kurama say that. We know Madara, Obito, and Nagato aren't reliable sources, because the tablet they read from was tampered with by Black Zetsu. While Kurama is more reliable, he was basically a newborn at the time and may have forgotten some things or Hagoromo didn't tell him everything. But based on the new version of the story, Hagoromo and Hamura sealed the Ten-Tails' body away into what became known as the Moon with Six Paths - Chibaku Tensei. While it's chakra was sealed into Hagoromo making him it's Jinchuriki, which he later extracted and created the nine Tailed Beast from, before scattering them across the world. Then he chose his son Asura as a successor to his Six Paths Senjutsu and ninshu over Indra, and then died.

So unless we're going to go based on the older version of his story told by sources less reliable than himself, which would mean there are now two bodies of the Ten-Tails' out there and Chibaku Tensei was used twice, and that Hamura would be on his deathbed too due to being the same age as his brother when he left to go to the Moon. When, in The Last, he was shown being on the Moon when young just like he was when he fought the Ten-Tails, and was stated to have gone to the Moon right after the fight with the Ten-Tails, not after his brother was about to die. Then there is only one Gedo Mazou, Chibaku Tensei was used once, and this is all going off of the new version of the story told by Hagoromo himself, The Last, the fourth databook, and common sense. So shouldn't all of the articles that keep retelling a combination of the old and new version of the story, which would mean there is two Gedo Mazous, which is clearly wrong, be changed to reflect the new version we were given at the end of the Manga, The Last, and by the fourth databook? --Legendary Super Saiya-Jin 4 (talk) 18:59, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

Well, this is a tough one. I don't think Kurama would say something like that so surely if it were untrue.--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 22:06, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, but based on what the new version of the story is. Kurama has to be wrong, because it's impossible for Hagoromo to have the Gedo Mazou in him if it's already in the Moon. Which is why Hamura and the rest of the clan left to guard it, based on what was said in the fourth databook and The Last. If Hagoromo had it in him, and used it to create the Moon. That means there would be two moons, which there clearly isn't. Kurama was just a wee little pup back then, so it's possible that he forgot or Hagoromo didn't tell him everything. It makes more sense for Kurama to be wrong than right, or else nothing makes any sense at all. Hagoromo and Hamura sealed the Gedo Mazou in the core of the Moon, which Hamura and the Otsutsuki Clan left to guard, with Hagoromo becoming the Jinchuriki via it's chakra. That is the only story that makes sense, cause if we go based on all the other versions, there is two Gedo Mazous, two Moons, and Hamura would be old and nearly dead when he went to the moon, when he was shown to be young. --Legendary Super Saiya-Jin 4 (talk) 18:35, August 18, 2015 (UTC)
New information > old information. Exceptions may happen, but that's the general rule. • Seelentau 愛 18:53, August 18, 2015 (UTC)
That's basically what I'm trying to say Seel, the new version of the story contradicts the older versions. So we should go based on what the new versions say over what the older versions say, mostly cause that's usually what happens, and if we try to combine both versions all we get is a huge illogical and contradictory mess. So don't you think the articles should be changed to reflect that? --Legendary Super Saiya-Jin 4 (talk) 19:03, August 18, 2015 (UTC)
It isn't the wiki's responsibility to decide which version of events is "true" or try to reconcile discrepancies. It reports the information that's been given, noting who said what if needed for clarity. ~SnapperTo 16:15, August 19, 2015 (UTC)
Yes, it isn't our job to correct the manga. But if old information gets updated with new information, we should abide to that, shouldn't we? • Seelentau 愛 17:03, August 19, 2015 (UTC)
You can give the new information preference, but you shouldn't exclude the old info or present the old info as if it were incorrect. ~SnapperTo 17:38, August 19, 2015 (UTC)
Alright, then I'm going to add Tobi as Madara again. • Seelentau 愛 17:47, August 19, 2015 (UTC)
Just be sure to pipe the link!
I actually don't think that's a fair comparison. The series has told us that Tobi was not really Madara. The series has not told us that Kurama's version of events was wrong. ~SnapperTo 17:53, August 19, 2015 (UTC)

Kurama was most certainly wrong/Kishi forgot/changed his mind so retcon.--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 20:39, August 19, 2015 (UTC)

@Snapper The series tells us it's wrong because all new sources tell a different version of the story, and if we follow Kurama's version, then nothing makes sense and we got two Gedo Mazous, the moon being created twice, and Hamura being old and on his deathbed when he went to the Moon. When he went to it when young, not on his deathbed. Kurama's version literally contradicts the new version completely and does nothing more than create plotholes. I'm not saying that the page shouldn't mention Kurama's version somewhere, but it shouldn't be written in such a way that his version is correct and that the two versions go together, because they don't. --Legendary Super Saiya-Jin 4 (talk) 00:29, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

It doesn't need to present Kurama's version as being correct, it just shouldn't present Kurama's version as being wrong either. So, "According to Kurama..." and leave it that. Do not introduce doubt, do not try to explain away discrepancies. ~SnapperTo 02:25, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Then perhaps it could be written like "According to Kurama..." and then "However, Hagoromo said..." or anything else that can be said that cites Hagoromo's words, The Last, and Jin no Sho? --Legendary Super Saiya-Jin 4 (talk) 05:06, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

What we know:

  • The Ten-Tails wasn't made moon and it made on his deathbed, legend wrong, rather, young Hagoromo and Hamura fought and defeated their mom, extracted her chakra and turned her into the Gedo Mazo and sealed inside the moon, where Hamura and folks went to guard her
  • The Tailed Beasts were created when Hagoromo was old though (flashback), he got inspired by Asura to do so
  • Thus he had kept Ten-Tails' chakra for many years
  • Since Hagoromo had no Gedo Mazo and he lived until after the creation of the Tailed Beasts, he was never a jinchuuriki, otherwise he would have died from the extraction, unless Kurama is right and he had Gedo Mazo to keep him alive for a while, which doesn't explain where the second Gedo Mazo went
  • There aren't 2 moons, so if there had been a second Gedo Mazo, it couldn't have been made into a moon then

--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 07:01, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Elve, you forget that Hagoromo is the ancestor of the Uzumaki Clan. Asura got his life force and physical energy from Hagoromo, and the Senju and Uzumaki Clan got it from Asura. The Uzumaki could survive extraction of the tailed beasts due to their powerful life force. So it is quite possible and logical for their almighty godlike ancestor to be able to survive for some time after the extraction. Not to mention more evidence points to him being the Jinchuriki than not being the Jinchuriki. But anyway, I think the articles should all be changed to reflect the new story. --Legendary Super Saiya-Jin 4 (talk) 18:30, September 3, 2015 (UTC)

Uzumaki descended from Senju, so you're wrong on the first sentence.--Omojuze (talk) 18:33, September 3, 2015 (UTC)

And the Senju come from Asura, who is Hagoromo's son. What are you talking about?--Legendary Super Saiya-Jin 4 (talk) 18:36, September 3, 2015 (UTC) Is anyone going to address this? I'm not a skilled enough editor to change anything myself. --Legendary Super Saiya-Jin 4 (talk) 00:11, September 19, 2015 (UTC)

Truth-Seeking Ball Again

I'm aware that Ten-Tails is listed as a user because it was influencing Obito's actions as its jinchūriki, but this just comes across as unnecessary given how its ability section doesn't really reflect that. Also, wouldn't Ten-Tails have to be listed as a user of Six Paths Senjutsu as well by that logic? And doing that would only cause confusion since it apparently controls natural energy but doesn't use senjutsu.--BeyondRed (talk) 07:06, October 1, 2015 (UTC)

If it were on me, Gedo Mazo, Ten-Tails and Kaguya articles would have long been merged already anyway.--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 11:30, October 1, 2015 (UTC)
And thankfully, it's not up to you, since that's a gross oversimplification of things. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 15:17, October 1, 2015 (UTC)
Not really, it's correction of things.--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 18:44, October 1, 2015 (UTC)


Again, it's retarded to use fatty bublasaur form, its an incomplete form. this one is good. --AskinNakkLeVaar (talk) 23:40, May 26, 2016 (UTC)

When suggesting an image, create a link for a page, not post the image itself. You can see how I fixed that. As for your proposal image, I don't really like your proposal image as it looks weird and its a jpg file. We typically want png. --Rai 水 (talk) 00:08, May 27, 2016 (UTC)
Image means nothing these days if it's a jpg one. WindStar7125 Divine Mangekyō Sharingan VolteMetalic.svg 00:10, May 27, 2016 (UTC)
oh fuck i forgot to change it to png lol ill do that real quick.--AskinNakkLeVaar (talk) 00:17, May 27, 2016 (UTC)
bump--AskinNakkLeVaar (talk) 05:14, May 28, 2016 (UTC)
Initial form image is better. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 05:20, May 28, 2016 (UTC)

thats so innacurate. we dont use Hiruko for Sasoris infobox...that fatass form was in like 2 chapters and we know its not its natural form. We really dont need to use that. besides its a terrible pic of that form anyways...--AskinNakkLeVaar (talk) 09:34, May 28, 2016 (UTC)

Insulting its form isn't going to change anything. Also, using Sasori as an example is terrible for the simple fact that Hiruko was metely as disguise and not Sasori's actual appearance. The Ten-Tails has multiple appearances, but as we usually do with all images, we only place images that depict how the character looked upon it's debut. Like you tried adding young adult Hamura to his infobox, although adult Hamura debuted first. In this case, the first form of the Ten-Tails is what we use. And FYI, you might not like the form being used, but the current image is far from terrible. --Rai 水 (talk) 17:43, May 28, 2016 (UTC)

Boruto Manga Chapter 35

Can anyone address that the Juubi was freed at somepoint from its prison and is now held captive by Kara? it was even name-dropped by Jigen personally. AnonymousAnomani (talk) 16:35, December 1, 2019 (UTC)

The Ten-Tails in Boruto is a different one as far as we can tell. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:37, December 1, 2019 (UTC)
Which evidence suggests it? Bare in mind that Ikemoto-sensei illustrates the Boruto manga differently instead of Kishimoto, so interpretation is suggestive at best. Also Sasuke never actually got to witness the Ten Tails in its first incarnation during the manga. AnonymousAnomani (talk) 18:38, December 5, 2019 (UTC)
Nothing to do with art, only logic. Check Talk:Ten-Tails (Kara), the rationale for why it's unlikely to be the same. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:24, December 5, 2019 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.