This page is an archive. Please do not edit this archive, instead try editing the page this archive originated from.

New Images

The past 3 or 4 images I've uploaded appear as the old version even though under the image summary you can see that I've uploaded a new one. Do you think it's a cache problem, because I've went on three different browsers and the same things happen. ~ FmakckTalkContributions 00:34, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Oh ok, and one more thing, can you teach me how to make an archive, it's almost about time for me to make one. ~ FmakckTalkContributions 00:45, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Block

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:26, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 08:43, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 21:48, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:16, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 12:05, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:03, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:33, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

I warned him. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 12:15, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 14:15, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:34, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:50, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:14, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:39, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:10, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:57, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 07:25, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:10, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:31, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:56, April 7, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:26, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:42, April 11, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:36, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:52, April 13, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:30, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:28, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:28, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:17, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:33, April 18, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 16:43, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:26, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:05, April 21, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:48, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:17, April 24, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:14, April 26, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:36, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:03, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:40, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:24, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:17, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:48, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:36, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:19, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:40, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:53, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:51, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:59, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:38, May 19, 2011 (UTC)


Why are you editing Pakura page? Stop it.—This unsigned comment was made by Faust-RSI (talkcontribs) .

  • I don't get your point. In English, please. Sorry, if you're not a native-speaker.
    • Common, another dude was deleting changes only because there was no proof of the resemblance (as in Shippuuden movie case). And now you are telling me the pictures are not necessary? This web-page is sure messy.

--Faust-RSI (talk) 13:14, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

  • you're calling me noob, yet you haven't add that link to unknown Iwa kunoichi page *facepalm* I don't care about your stupid rules or "methodology", because those are not helping people to see some interesting facts, as simple pictures do. I can't care about you less, but I care about people that reading this wiki and 98% of them don't give a shit about your "methodology". Stop being a little bitch and improve you English - it sucks, really.

Vacuum Wave

I can quite easily cope with you reverting and referring to my edits as fluff, if the information can appear and be justified as unnecessary but on this occassion, would you please mind explaining what you find so unnecessary about mentioning an evident weakness in the technique in question that was even exploited by Sasuke in chapter 477. Blackstar1 (talk) 00:43, February 15, 2011 (UTC)

Firstly let me say thank you and to also apologize, as it appears you have misinterpreted what I have said, I was instead referring to the article Wind Release: Vacuum Wave, where I wrote about how the technique could be avoided. I have no issue with the reverts on other pages and had assumed that you had done so for the reasons you stated anyway, however, could you please refrain from remarking "fluff" when correcting or simplifying most of my edits, at least not in every circumstance. I understand your reasons for doing so and on most occasions I'd be the first to admit that it's justified, but I am attempting to temper my writing so it is more available yet you must be able to understand that the term can be used negatively and seeing it repeatedly attached to your edits can quickly become annoying, even if it is intended constructively. Hopefully, I don't give you the wrong impression of myself, I really don't mind criticism but I felt that this needed to be said before a larger misunderstanding occurs. Blackstar1 (talk) 01:18, February 15, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Blackstar1 (talk) 01:33, February 15, 2011 (UTC)


You may remove this if wish, but I wanted to clarify something. Regarding the edit on the Chibi page, it was an accident. I was trying to undo a previous edit by someone else and forgot to erase what they did before I published. I'm also fairly new to wiki editing so don't think of me as a vandal or something. I probably shouldn't feel this way, but I am easily intimidated by people on sites like this so I was kinda afraid to even send this.--Kohaku-chan (talk) 13:00, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

Prajñā Group Image

As for this, I uploaded the image only to see that you had already done so, so I reverted mine because I guess my cache was acting up and I saw that both of the images were the same. ~ Fmakck©TalkContributions ~ 21:26, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

About Naruto's Jinchuuriki forms

Could you please explain why Naruto's Jinchuuriki forms isn't separated as Version 1 and Version 2?? If you don't mind, please link the reasons or the talk page related to it. --N 21 (talk) 11:45, February 18, 2011 (UTC)

That doesn't really make sense to me. Both Naruto and Bee's forms are no different IMO. You say Version 2 is a humanoid Bijuu form. That's the same as 4-tails up. Even Yamato states so. I think I sort of get what you mean about him not having Version 2. It's because of the new cloak and the fact that Kyuubi's unwilling to cooperate with him so therefore he can't reach Version 2. But still, I think it should still be classified since we're looking at it's characteristics. Not the amount of control Naruto has over his forms. —This unsigned comment was made by N 21 (talkcontribs) .


Why did you switch back the Akatsuchi pictures. There isn't a difference between the anime and manga. Fishboy144 (talk) 19:30, February 19, 2011 (UTC)


Why did you delete Madara from users? The things that were said needed to be added says to add him as a user because Madara talks about his Moon Eye Plan. And it involves Tsukuomi. —This unsigned comment was made by Brian Waldbart (talkcontribs) .

Ok sorry about that and I did add him back so I just deleted him and if you need help editing pages just let me know. Brian Waldbart (talk) 04:14, February 20, 2011 (UTC) Brian Waldbart


Why did you delete the picture of Itachi's bleeding eyes? Brian Waldbart (talk) 06:03, February 20, 2011 (UTC)Brian Waldbart


Where do you watch the new episodes when they first debut? I always use Narutobase, but that quality is not so good and is why I never upload images when the episodes first comes out. ~ Fmakck©TalkContributions ~ 13:14, February 24, 2011 (UTC)

But sadly I fall in the category of people who have to wait 7 days before watching the new ep. on Crunchyroll. ~ Fmakck©TalkContributions ~ 13:34, February 24, 2011 (UTC)

Unnamed yotsuki clan member

Do you need any pictures of him? LIGHTNING HAWK (talk) 19:24, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Yotsuki Image

This time you beat me by 3 seconds... ~ Fmakck©TalkContributions ~ 19:25, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Haha, I didn't mean it as a competition, just sayin' this has happened like 2 or 3 times. ~ Fmakck©TalkContributions ~ 19:31, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Flying Thunder God Technique Yamato Announces to Killer Bee that he wasn't quite at the Forth's Level —This unsigned comment was made by Mitchie Okere (talkcontribs) .

Re: messages

Tomoegozen, sorry. --Hazel-rah (talk) 19:32, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Cleaver Sword Image

Hi i want to ask you a question? why did you delete the cleaver sword anime pic?? plz reply —This unsigned comment was made by Rush27 (talkcontribs) .

Re: Images

I see you added the fair use rationale and license for the images already. Thanks, and I'll make sure I add them next time. Gentle Moonlight (talk) 19:57, March 14, 2011 (UTC)


Ok... I'm sorry LIGHTNING HAWK (talk) 11:37, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Don't you think that Darui should have a videogame section? LIGHTNING HAWK (talk) 11:41, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Uchiwa

Madara calls it the Curse of Hatred (憎しみの呪い, Nikushimi no noroi). —ShounenSuki (talk | contribs | translations) 12:48, March 20, 2011 (UTC)


Hi I'm Morgan silve. I just need to know how to say "light release" and "prism release" in japanese.Luis Gabriel Lamborgini 21:58, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

I'm so sorry, I really didn't know!! :P. Eitherway, I'm terribly sorry for wasting your time. Thank-you for letting me know who was in charge of translations.Luis Gabriel Lamborgini 01:35, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Oh it's ok, it's just that I want to make good friends with everyone in this Wikia. Is it ok if I show you my own Wikia? Hopefully it wouldn't be advertizing..Luis Gabriel Lamborgini 01:48, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

My site is again you let me tell you it, so hopefully it wouldn't be considered vandalization!! =) Luis Gabriel Lamborgini 02:58, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

I hope it was funny, haha! Well thank-you for your help. Luis Gabriel Lamborgini 20:18, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Fix it

Thanks :D Thatll be great! —This unsigned comment was made by Raffyjack123 (talkcontribs) .

Shippuuden 204 IMages

It feel like we are having an upload race today :D --Gojita (talk) 12:41, March 24, 2011 (UTC)Gojita

Re: 530 revisited

Shikaku says "Izumo, Kotetsu, I'm leaving Kakuzu to you two and Darui. That guy uses Doton... Base the found around Darui and his Raiton." (「イズモ コテツ、角都はお前達とダルイにまかせる。そいつは土遁を使う…雷遁のダルイを軸に戦え。」, "Izumo, Kotetsu, Kakuzu wa omae-tachi to Darui ni makaseru. Soitsu wa Doton o tsukau... Raiton no Darui o jiku ni tatakae.") —ShounenSuki (talk | contribs | translations) 19:52, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Height & Weight

Ok, but out of fairness, if a character had HIV/AIDS, I do think that would constitute at least one sentence...—This unsigned comment was made by Timeel39 (talkcontribs) .

Re: 10 Tails image

I didn't upload it. Also how come we aren't using the two images from the anime in the article? Why should we only have the icon there that someone made instead of something actually from the series? It's kind of weird. And why is the infobox locked? --_-- It's like no one wants to improve the article at all. Banan14kab 00:34, April 1, 2011 (UTC)


That would be my fault. I saw that despite being deleted, it was still being listed in semantic lists, and I was told that recreating the article with no semantic content can be used to overwrite this. Apparently, it worked before in the Yu-Gi-Oh wiki. If this works, we can finally get rid of those red links that show up in semantic lists. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:09, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Tensei

I noticed that too. The additional filters show up under the new terms, but the jutsu themselves show up under the old terms. I was going to ask Simant if they didn't fix themselves after a week. ~SnapperTo 22:20, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

I don't think I can actually fix it. I'm not even certain Simant could fix it. It's one of the many semantic peculiarities that has no apparent cause. ~SnapperTo 22:48, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
It's a problem for barriers too.
Yes, that is a solution. It won't allow the results to be filtered further but it will at least make those list-links usable. ~SnapperTo 00:07, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Ao's article

How come we aren't using the other Byakugan image for Ao's article? Banan14kab 05:28, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Nobles

The other three are the Aburame clan, the Hyūga clan, and the Uchiha clan. —ShounenSuki (talk | contribs | translations) 21:20, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

First databook, page 215. —ShounenSuki (talk | contribs | translations) 21:50, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
This should probably be added to the Konohagakure article. SimAnt 22:11, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Possible issue

I'm not sure what you are seeing... SimAnt 22:11, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Whether or not there's a space doesn't make a difference. This happens every once in a while with Mangekyō Sharingan. To fix it, you just change something about the article. I usually add a link, change a word, move something, etc. ~SnapperTo 01:44, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

It may be related to some wiki image feature. The Mangekyō article was previously the only one to have this sort of problem and it's had an image gallery for a long time. And now the same problem is appearing in pages that are taking advantage of the slideshow feature. It's suspicious. ~SnapperTo 03:34, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Re: this: he's fixing the above problem. ~SnapperTo 21:10, April 17, 2011 (UTC)


maybe I should have been careful in editing images.I now edit in proper way. --{{SUBST:User:Stone Roger/sig}} 13:50, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Reporting

It is probably best. They probably won't get blocked, but I can keep an eye on them. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:53, April 9, 2011 (UTC)


Thanks Cerez. That was a great edit. Much more clearer then the previous wording (:—This unsigned comment was made by SusanooUnleashed (talkcontribs) .

Yeah, sorry about that. I was in abit of a rush and forgot. SusanooUnleashed (talk) 10:00, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Samehada Picture

How come you decided to change the new Samehada picture with the older one? In the newer one from episode 207, Kisame doesn't have Killer Bee's sword in his shoulder, and Ponta is no longer in the background, so I figured that screenshot would be better. Diamonddeath (talk) 05:18, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

I was trying to provide an updated version of the picture. I thought that was allowed to be done. I had uploaded the picture as a separate one, but I think it must have gotten deleted because I also tried to update the pictures and accidentally uploaded the picture multiple times. I'll just upload it as a separate picture, again.Diamonddeath (talk) 21:19, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Ao trapped

You included the video player in the screenshot. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:42, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

You know, you could have just uploaded the good version on top of the bad one. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:43, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

Neji page

Is that so? Mate, reverting things seems to be YOUR speciality. If I had to post on someone's Talk Page for every edit which gets reverted despite its worthiness, I'd expect others to do the same thing. It's something even Omnibender commented about. --Aldarinor (talk) 12:55, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

Well, in such a case you'd have a Talk Page packed full of complaints for edits I consider good which get constantly reverted because of trifles. You know, if a little something's wrong in what someone wrote, there's no need to annihilate his work by COMPLETELY reverting his edit... You could just delete the thing which doesn't fit in. But that must definitely seem too hard, seeing as everyone keeps reverting everyone's edits... And by the way, I'm not being petty. I'm just doing what I think is right. A bit harshly, I admit, that's not something I enjoy doing, and I'd rather speak civily. But it's not that I'm the only one. --Aldarinor (talk) 13:20, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

I don't need to revaluate anything. If you had read the post above carefully, you would have noticed that I said "I WOULD rather speak civily", something which I'm not doing right now, as evident of my latest openly aggressive attitude. An abominable thing, I admit, but, permit the expression, I'm really pissed off. --Aldarinor (talk) 14:09, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

No idea of what you just said. And that's because, ahem, I'm not really that good at abbreviated forms... What is "tl;dr" supposed to mean? --Aldarinor (talk) 14:16, April 16, 2011 (UTC)


What do you mean with the ref thing? I see it fine. ~ Fmakck© (Images | contribs) 13:57, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

It might be just a bug, the wikia's been a lot of hem lately. ~ Fmakck© (Images | contribs) 14:00, April 16, 2011 (UTC)


Hi! Are the characters' quotes are based from the manga? Thanks. --Ilnarutoanime (talk) 15:03, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

Ah, okay! Thank you! ^_^ --Ilnarutoanime (talk) 15:07, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

RE. Itachi and Susanoo

It needed to completely reform. Remember what happened with Sasuke's Susanoo, when it got damaged it needed to completely reform to repair said damage. And why wouldn't Itachi have enough time to form it in the first place? Susanoo appears instantly. Again, you're just denying it since you don't want Itachi to be weaker than you imagined.--NaruHina fan (talk) 20:19, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

Four-Tailed Monkey

why did you delete the edit on the 4-tails. it was true —This unsigned comment was made by THUNDERPANTHER (talkcontribs) .

THUNDERPANTHER (talk) 14:34, April 20, 2011 (UTC) in the manga the flame was green and was flikering like a flame. so why

have you seen the manga pic of it its a flame.THUNDERPANTHER (talk) 14:48, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

THUNDERPANTHER (talk) 14:53, April 20, 2011 (UTC) plus who made this dision

Re: Reporting

Ah Okay! Thanks again :) --Ilnarutoanime (talk) 14:48, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

THUNDERPANTHER (talk) 15:01, April 20, 2011 (UTC) but since when was lava green. unless that the4-tails is always throwing up. most of the powers the tailed best have look normal. but this might be flame with super heat. diffrent flames color have diffrent temps of heat

what do you mean like this.--THUNDERPANTHER

Re: juin

As far as I know, that only goes for technique categories not used in the databooks. —ShounenSuki (talk | contribs | translations) 16:52, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

Technically yes, but it was never used as an actual category. The only ones that were are:
  • ninjutsu,
  • taijutsu,
  • genjutsu,
  • kekkei genkai,
  • hiden,
  • juinjutsu,
  • fūinjutsu, and
  • senjutsu.
ShounenSuki (talk | contribs | translations) 16:59, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
It should be clone technique. —ShounenSuki (talk | contribs | translations) 17:04, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

Wouldn't that technically conflict with the actual Clone Technique article? Does to parenthesis listing thing work with the code used to collect jutsu type articles into the jutsu article? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:29, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

Zetsu Communication Jutsu

I'm confused about your explanation of this technique. In the manga white Zetsu said he had to tell him (obviously Madara) about Naruto and Bee's escape and sent roots underground. In the next panel white Zetsu appeared before Madara. Was one of them a clone or something? They were both split in half so your explanation does not make sense unless there were two white Zetsu to begin with and one sent the "message" to the other to tell Madara. Banan14kab 11:40, April 21, 2011 (UTC)

Ah I reread the manga page and see I misinterpreted it. That was Black Zetsu who sent the message to White Zetsu. They both have the flytrap appendages. I didn't notice before since I only paid attention to the panels after Black Zetsu talked so I only noticed the white foot and forgot about the black half that was speaking. OK no biggie. Also do you know any sites that provide episode screenshots early or on a quick basis? I use , but they are not always up to speed. Banan14kab 12:09, April 21, 2011 (UTC)

Mei and Team

Cerez, you need to reupload the image without the English text. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 17:15, April 21, 2011 (UTC)

Eight-Tails Subduing Team

In the infobox you should put on the division of "weapons": Kohaku no Jōhei and Manriki-gusari. (talk) 14:00, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

Re: minor trans help

The kanji on the left side of the book (from my point of view) is the kanji for 'deer' (鹿, shika). —ShounenSuki (talk | contribs | translations) 21:48, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

Seventh Hokage

can u do me a big favour and stop canceling my the seventh hogake because iv watched the latest episode and it says he becomes the hogake —This unsigned comment was made by Hornsey56 (talkcontribs) .

Torune Picture

Why did you remove the picture of Torune's eyes? Diamonddeath (talk) 17:32, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

Isn't the licensing status that it was in the manga? Also, I figured that it would be a nice image for the mistake, since it was indeed published. Diamonddeath (talk) 04:00, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

Sand Coffin

watch episode 165 of naruto in the anime not the manga im watching it right now the ninja says to kakashi we go from village to village copying and earning new justus her is one you will know and he says sand coffin kakashi says thats gaaras justu you watch the manga not the anime—This unsigned comment was made by Hornsey56 (talkcontribs) .

Re: Trans

Chōza says:

"Three clans that use rare hiden ninjutsu" (「希少な秘伝忍術を扱う三つの一族達」, "Kishōna hiden ninjutsu o atsukau mittsu no ichizoku-tachi").

There's no real doubt about it: the Akimichi, Nara, and Yamanaka clans all make use of hiden ninjutsu. The question is, of course, whether this means the shinten line ninjutsu are retconned into being hiden, or if Chōza was referring to some other ninjutsu. Perhaps it's only their telepathy that is ninjutsu, or their hiden ninjutsu could have somehow lost its status. —ShounenSuki (talk | contribs | translations) 20:25, April 25, 2011 (UTC)

Why edit?

Why have you edited that thing about body replacement? How do you know that body flicker is used? How can it be body flicker if the user is pinned down. It isn't logical that user can move from pinned position and that the one that pinned him doesn't even realize that the user got away. If it isn't information from databook it isn't valid as by itself it has many mistakes (stated above).

Re: Hiruko

I am watching episode 20 on crunchyroll and at around 5:55 Chiyo says, "And that puppet Hiruko... used to be a shinobi from another village." ~ Fmakck© (Images | contribs) 16:00, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

I checked on and Chiyo's saying the same thing. ~ Fmakck© (Images | contribs) 16:17, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
So do you think this was a mistranslation from both Hulu and Crunchyroll? ~ Fmakck© (Images | contribs) 20:18, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Unsigned Template

Thanks Cerez. K--KiumaruHamachi (talk) 01:17, April 28, 2011 (UTC)iumaruHamachi


Ok. I am tired of this edit warring going on. What exactly is wrong with all my edits? Who is to say the manga Izanagi images are better than the ones I put? This is all a matter of opinion, but I guess I cannot have a free say. And what do you mean wait until next week? I don't need you telling me what to do. Banan14kab 00:46, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

All right you proved your point. I guess the reason I get so mad with people on here usually is because they do not back up their points until I ask them on their pages or ask them to tell me. Also just out of curiousity what is the simple answer? I'm not being sarcastic, I really wan tot know what you meant. Banan14kab 01:44, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

-_- Thanks man. I guess the only solution for edits not to be changed is to not make them at all...basically you're saying I'm incapable of editing at all or making edits that improve. I guess discouraging users to edit is common for you. Guess your edits are the only good ones. Banan14kab 02:17, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Well the fact that your only solution to my editing problem was to simply not edit at all does sound pretty discouraging so I don't know how you expected me to take the tone of that answer. I understand that there are rules and policies, but when people change my edits most of the time they don't explain why and it ticks me off They should leave edit summaires instead of me having to chase them down on their pages all the time. Banan14kab 02:40, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Image Etiquette

Hi! I know the raws are preferred. Thanks for it. The reason I change Danzō's image is to put it in his appearance info. I only removed the white spaces. I have a question, why are raws are preferred? Thanks again Cerez365! --Ilnarutoanime (Talk-Contribs.-Images) 11:36, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

Lol! Isn't that because the white bubbles is so white? By the way, thank you again! --Ilnarutoanime (Talk-Contribs.-Images) 11:43, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

Steam-based Ninjutsu

Listen,can you add a page:Steam-based Ninjutsu.I can not do it with a form,so I am asking you to do that.That is Fighting Style used by Han.It is probably used to smokescreen territory,so Han could easly confuse and defeat opponent.Steam is produced in mushroom -like thing on Hans Steam Armour.—This unsigned comment was made by (talkcontribs) .

There's no need to do that because we don't know details of his fighting style. We're doing a speculation if we say so. --Ilnarutoanime (Talk-Contribs.-Images) 05:10, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

All right then.No problem.But,if it appear in manga or anime,we should make that page.—This unsigned comment was made by (talkcontribs) .

Yup. But I don't think Han will appear. Maybe in the next chapters. I apologize for this late reply.--Ilnarutoanime26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) 06:34, May 8, 2011 (UTC)


Hahah, what do you have against summary tags? ~ Fmakck© (Images | contribs) 11:02, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

I think so, but I put the tags in this page because the summary would automatically show up in the Chakra article. You can remove the tags if you want, but remember to add a summary in the chakra page for Gift of the Hermit Group. ~ Fmakck© (Images | contribs) 11:17, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Hebi Image

Hey there. I don't mean any disrespect in undoing your edits. The reason why I took off the other image is based on the point that everyone else has already said. Only the team's name changed not the members or overall appearance of the team itself. So the Hebi image is largely unnecessary. Do you get what I'm saying? All the other information such as their first appearance as Hebi and Taka has been deleted because it is superfluous. Banan14kab 13:14, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Yea good point man. Also I just wanted to explain myself as reasonably as possible that's all. I changed the image to a different Taka one where they are all seen wearing their black cloaks. They were only affiliated with Akatsuki for awhile. Banan14kab 13:48, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
Oh come any of edits stay or cause no controversy? The current image is the team as Hebi not Taka. There is no picture with them all like that except the one I found. Jugo is an adult in his Akatsuki cloak only. I'll go look for another image e.e Banan14kab 14:25, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
Nevermind. I give up. I just like to contribute to the wiki. There's no image that meets all criteria. Jugo remains a child from Taka's battle with Killer Bee to fighting A at the Five Kage Summit, but by then Taka is defected. All other Taka images of him are in an Akatsuki cloak. So forget it you guys win. Banan14kab 14:39, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Necklace

I can't find anything about that type of necklace, sorry. I'll keep on looking, though. —ShounenSuki (talk | contribs | translations) 21:28, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Naruto's Taijutsu section

I tried searching already for the anime screenshot... Who do we ask for one?--NaruHina fan (talk) 22:36, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

I think a Post-Timeskip is needed. Like him fending off Deva Path.--NaruHina fan (talk) 23:15, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

My Bad

Just got the message now i know it's British English.—This unsigned comment was made by Reddju (talkcontribs) .

Re: Amaterasu

Madara has never used it? I'm writing about Jiraiya sealing the fire into a scroll. Not once have I added anything about Madara. Sorry, you have the wrong person.—This unsigned comment was made by Niahn (talkcontribs) .


Thank you. I will change it :D --Ilnarutoanime26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) 25 px 04:56, May 11, 2011 (UTC)


Can you change Part 1 age to just 51? that is what the 2nd databook says and I'm not allowed to edit infoboxes without an account. (talk) 15:25, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

Where is this discussion taking place? (talk) 23:28, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Shino image

Thank you and...workin' on it.--—This unsigned comment was made by RyunnKazan (talkcontribs) .

Shall do.—This unsigned comment was made by RyunnKazan (talkcontribs) .

Having some trouble here. How do I find the table that I put the information on?—This unsigned comment was made by RyunnKazan (talkcontribs) .


If you edit Infobox:Fuki and Infobox:Kasumi, you'll see captions showing who is who. They aren't showing up in the final product though. ~SnapperTo 16:43, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

Changes To Karin Page

I made an edit recently which explained Karins history in part 1, and although she didn't appear until part 2, she still had an involvement in The Chunin Exams Saga, and although it was mentioned in the Background section, that means nothing, it can be both used as an extra reference, ad many other pages on this wiki have. And even though she wasnt introduced until part 2, Kimimaru wasnt introduced until Sasuke Retrieval, yet if you look at his bio on this wiki, it mentions his involvements with the Chunin arc. So I demand I be given permission to put that part back because there was no problem with it.

Read Cerez's remark here: [1]--NejiLoverr26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) Konohagakure Symbol 20:08, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

I HAVE SUCCEEDED-- (talk) 12:02, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

You didn't hahahaha! --NejiLoverr26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) Konohagakure Symbol 13:05, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Info Box

Hey, how do you add a picture in an info box? —This unsigned comment was made by RyunnKazan (talkcontribs) .

Danzo Shimura Episode page.

Hey there. I was wondering if you could help me out with something? I'm having some issues with this article. None of the admins have had a problem with the image I have added for the episode cover, but I'm having an edit war with some users who keep reverting it to this image. Is it possible to protect the page for awhile or block it to prevent all this edit warring? I'm tired of people reverting my edits for no reason other than them simply thinking the other is more "dramatic" when I was just trying to add variety. Banan14kab 15:54, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Never mind, Jacce already took care of it. Banan14kab 16:01, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
OK. I just wanted those users off my ass. I seriously don't think there was anything wrong with my image. People can't get the concept of variety and diversity. I mean the main image doesn't have to be the same one from the jutsu article. Am I right? Banan14kab 16:12, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
OK...I guess I see your point. Also what do you mean by more "economical"? And it's true it could serve both purposes, but I think it's more creative to find a new one. Anyway it's not your edit or image so I can see why you shouldn't care. I just really don't see why people were so hellbent on changing my edit. Banan14kab 16:25, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
Lol, you still didn't answer my question though. Banan14kab 16:40, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Image Naming

I'm sorry it was an accident. I accidentally upload it without removing it. I put on the rationale thing on it to either change the name or delete it. I'm so sorry. --NejiLoverr26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) Konohagakure Symbol 12:22, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Oh I forgot to thank you for asking it to SnapperTo. --NejiLoverr26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) Konohagakure Symbol 13:41, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Obito Image

Why did you remove Obito's image? I read your summary. It's just like in Kakashi, his image without mask in the manga. --_-_-=NejiLoverr26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) Konohagakure Symbol 11:45, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Okay I got your point. I will just find full-body-image. --_-_-=NejiLoverr26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) Konohagakure Symbol 11:53, May 16, 2011 (UTC)


What do you mean of that? Kirin is Japanese word or something right? ^_^ --_-_-=NejiLoverr26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) Konohagakure Symbol 14:07, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Oh okay...I got it. Sorry if I disturb you for this nonsense again. --_-_-=NejiLoverr26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) Konohagakure Symbol 14:14, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Translation again~

Yo! I hop you don't mind me answering your question. The Kanji simply mean 火影 Hokage :) Seelentau 愛 17:06, May 16, 2011 (UTC)


what was now the problem with Mei.png? I think, I wrote the license and did everything like you told me. (Don't say me your other picture looks better, because it has a very bad quality and it doesn't look very nice.)°Aizen°(Dissi) 17:59, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Then you should look at it again and it's hardly noticeable that she looks to the side. After all, this is not as important as quality.°Aizen°(Dissi) 18:25, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

because mine looks better. But I've got an idea how to solve the problem. This way we do it in the german wikia.°Aizen°(Dissi) 18:38, May 17, 2011 (UTC)


Hi Cerez! I saw your images were high quality. Where do you watch Naruto Shippūden Episodes? --_-_-=NejiLoverr26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) Konohagakure Symbol 13:20, May 18, 2011 (UTC)

Okay... Thank you very much! I will try to download so.--_-_-=NejiLoverr26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) Konohagakure Symbol 13:49, May 18, 2011 (UTC)

Kakashi Trivia Undo War

Okay I got it like for Kakkō, a powerful jōnin, that I think, can be considered as major enemy. My deepest apologies for undoing some of your edits which was really correct and complaining such, see I have two or three complains. ^_^ --_-_-=NejiLoverr26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) Konohagakure Symbol 14:50, May 18, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah... like a one of the best shinobi of Konoha, will of course defeat a lot of strong enemies. I'm sorry again for the undo war though mine was wrong. --_-_-=NejiLoverr26 (Talk-Contribs.-Links) Konohagakure Symbol 14:59, May 18, 2011 (UTC)


I see now...I guess that makes sense. (Parak111 (talk) 14:38, May 19, 2011 (UTC))

Neiji 539 talk page

I undid your revision to the talkpage of Neiji. The reasoning behind this is I felt it helped create a census on how to word what happened in ch. 539, the topic was discussing how to state what happened without speculating. I understand that some members got off topic but you can't wantonly delete a whole topic because a few people decided to go off topic. Please respond if you have objections, I understand this will be most likely resolved by the next release of Naruto. --Alastar 89 (talk) 20:36, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

I understand that you don't want it turning into a forum but I think it has some relevance to exist because at least a few of the posters - me included - discussed how best to convey the information from the last chapter. We didn't want the way the event was conveyed to be jumping to conclusions on whether Neiji is a traitor, being controlled or is Zetsu. We decided it would be best to have the word 'appear' or middle-ground wording be injected into the explanation since not all information has been presented, it would be equivalent to 'presumed dead' since there isn't a definitive answer. It was an effort to help put a stopper in a potential edit frenzy over the event until the next chapter can possibly explain what is going on; if an explanation is shown and a consensus among members is shown on how it is to be worded, then maybe this will prevent unnecessary changes to the article. If you are truly worried about it, you can place a post in the topic to remind members not to get off topic. I took a look at the subsequent posts after my post and can agree some of those posts were too forum-like in nature but think that some of the posts need to be heard.--Alastar 89 (talk) 21:29, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.