We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!
If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.
Re: Sakura's recent jutsu(s) missing from her infobox
I'm seeing them in her infobox. Anyway, normally, if the technique in question is a new one, it takes a while for the technique to show up in any infobox, because the metadata associated with it has yet to "recognized" by the system. Regarding the Summoning Technique, that is a bit more complicated. Until very recently, techniques which exist in both manga and anime, but that a user has only used in one of those media (like in this case), would not show up. Simant has worked some of his coding wizardry and that appears to have been fixed in some articles, though not all. For example, Flying Thunder God still doesn't show up in Tobirama's infobox. If we were to list him as a user in the anime as well, it wouldn't probably show, but he has yet to be known to use it in the anime. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:05, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Tense rule
Most articles are to be written in the past tense, yes, but for media ones, like chapters, episodes, OVA, movies, and (I think) the plot section of video games, they are to be written in the present. Those articles are to be read as if what they chronicle is happening. They say what is happening. Character articles, for example, say what has happened. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:39, June 19, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Source Editor
It is one of the few legal stream sites, but the only one that many people can access, without needing to be in the US. Even if you don't see the clips on the day they're released, they become free to watch on Crunchyroll after a week has passed (so, next week, people will be able to freely watch last week's episode), so we consider whatever happens in Crunchyroll to be the most important. Illegal stream sites take many liberties with translations and therefore, are not as reliable. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 08:04, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
re: unnecessary content
The user who added that content always seems to add unneeded details to pages. Feel free to revert, I'm no longer in the mood to deal with them and their useless edits. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 11:32, June 2, 2015 (UTC)
How you equate plot overviews to full on video game walkthroughs is just silly. But I have long lost my will to debate on this wiki at any real level so I'll let it slide and not bring this issue up to the community. Do as you please. Go ahead and wipe out the plot summaries on episode and arc pages as well since it is too much for you read. Good day.16:26, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
Re: Extremely Detailed Game Plot Overviews
Saw some of that from the side lines. While I think video game articles should have a plot overview if they have their own original plot, I do believe that some restraint should be exercised. There's a discussion on video game coverage going on somewhere, I believe you should take your issues there, as the extent to which video games are covered is the main topic being discussed. Look through the recent changes and I'm sure you'll find it. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 19:56, June 11, 2015 (UTC)