FANDOM

(Difference between revisions) | User:Heartlesslove93
(Welcome to Narutopedia!)
 
 
Line 24: Line 24:
   
 
There's a lot to do around here, so we hope you'll stay with us and make many more contributions. And again, welcome to {{SITENAME}}. Please leave a message on [[User talk:Dantman|my talk page]] if I can help with anything! -- [[User:Dantman|Dantman]] ([[User talk:Dantman|talk]]) 20:13, February 16, 2019 (UTC)
 
There's a lot to do around here, so we hope you'll stay with us and make many more contributions. And again, welcome to {{SITENAME}}. Please leave a message on [[User talk:Dantman|my talk page]] if I can help with anything! -- [[User:Dantman|Dantman]] ([[User talk:Dantman|talk]]) 20:13, February 16, 2019 (UTC)
  +
  +
topic was closed, so i messaged you here
  +
  +
you said"You sort of missed what they said. There is debate on this, but some argue the male pronouns as mistranslations from the original text to promote the "male' superiority of the times. I known not if this is accurate or not, but quoting a bible really isn't going to help clear that up unless its the original one."
  +
  +
the fact is, that they are not mistranslated. the pronounces are accurate.
  +
moreover the belief that the bible has many mistranslations and inaccuracies is false.
  +
Any unbiased document scholar will agree that the Bible has been remarkably well-preserved over the centuries. Copies of the Bible dating to the 14th century AD are nearly identical in content to copies from the 3rd century AD. When the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered, scholars were shocked to see how similar they were to other ancient copies of the Old Testament, even though the Dead Sea Scrolls were hundreds of years older than anything previously discovered. Even many hardened skeptics and critics of the Bible admit that the Bible has been transmitted over the centuries far more accurately than any other ancient document.
  +
  +
There is absolutely no evidence that the Bible has been revised, edited, or tampered with in any systematic manner. The sheer volume of biblical manuscripts makes it simple to recognize any attempt to distort God’s Word. There is no major doctrine of the Bible that is put in doubt as a result of the inconsequential differences among the manuscripts.
  +
  +
and while there are some level of mistranslations. the word angelos is not one of them. it is 100% a masculine word
  +
the word angelos has no feminine form. angelos meaning is messenger. and while there is a feminine form of messenger, its not angelos, the word for messenger that has both a masculine and feminine form is Aggelos"masculine" and Aggeliki "Feminine" but neither of these words ever appear in the abrahamic scriptures EVER
  +
and like i said The only named angels in the Bible—Michael, Gabriel, Lucifer are all male names. and never had a feminine form
  +
  +
[[User:Actionmanrandell|Actionmanrandell]] ([[User talk:Actionmanrandell|talk]]) 22:24, February 19, 2019 (UTC)actionmanrandell[[User:Actionmanrandell|Actionmanrandell]] ([[User talk:Actionmanrandell|talk]]) 22:24, February 19, 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:24, February 19, 2019

Welcome Edit

Wiki-wordmark

Hello Heartlesslove93, greetings and welcome to the Narutopedia! Thanks for your edit to the Outdated gender info on Orochimaru's page page.

We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!

If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.

Here are several other pages that can help you with where to begin-
Wiki Activity – A great first stop, because you can see what pages other people have been editing, and where you can help out.
Help Pages - If you're new to editing or having trouble getting something to work, the help pages are a great place to start.
Forums - The forums are used for a number of things, from proposing policy changes to general wiki discussions. Please use Naruto Answers for asking general questions.
Administrators - A list of Narutopedia's administrators. If you need additional assistance or are having troubles, feel free to contact an administrator with the details.
Special:Upload - A page that provides you a form for uploading images easily.

Always sign in before you edit – This is so that we can recognize you!

Always sign your posts - When leaving a message on someone's talk page, remember to sign it by clicking either the 'signature' button or by typing four tildes (~~~~). This is so the person knows who to reply to.

There's a lot to do around here, so we hope you'll stay with us and make many more contributions. And again, welcome to Narutopedia. Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Dantman (talk) 20:13, February 16, 2019 (UTC)

topic was closed, so i messaged you here

you said"You sort of missed what they said. There is debate on this, but some argue the male pronouns as mistranslations from the original text to promote the "male' superiority of the times. I known not if this is accurate or not, but quoting a bible really isn't going to help clear that up unless its the original one."

the fact is, that they are not mistranslated. the pronounces are accurate. moreover the belief that the bible has many mistranslations and inaccuracies is false. Any unbiased document scholar will agree that the Bible has been remarkably well-preserved over the centuries. Copies of the Bible dating to the 14th century AD are nearly identical in content to copies from the 3rd century AD. When the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered, scholars were shocked to see how similar they were to other ancient copies of the Old Testament, even though the Dead Sea Scrolls were hundreds of years older than anything previously discovered. Even many hardened skeptics and critics of the Bible admit that the Bible has been transmitted over the centuries far more accurately than any other ancient document.

There is absolutely no evidence that the Bible has been revised, edited, or tampered with in any systematic manner. The sheer volume of biblical manuscripts makes it simple to recognize any attempt to distort God’s Word. There is no major doctrine of the Bible that is put in doubt as a result of the inconsequential differences among the manuscripts.

and while there are some level of mistranslations. the word angelos is not one of them. it is 100% a masculine word the word angelos has no feminine form. angelos meaning is messenger. and while there is a feminine form of messenger, its not angelos, the word for messenger that has both a masculine and feminine form is Aggelos"masculine" and Aggeliki "Feminine" but neither of these words ever appear in the abrahamic scriptures EVER and like i said The only named angels in the Bible—Michael, Gabriel, Lucifer are all male names. and never had a feminine form

Actionmanrandell (talk) 22:24, February 19, 2019 (UTC)actionmanrandellActionmanrandell (talk) 22:24, February 19, 2019 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.