Re: Gaara and Magnet Release

I am very against the removal of Magnet Release. However, I was provided (no matter how stupid I think it is) evidence that favored "erring on the side of caution". I think it's BS and the wiki fails a little more because of it, but I cannot fault the logic.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol (talk) 20:46, August 12, 2014 (UTC)

Anent Sasuke and Naruto....

It had been explicitly mentioned in the Manga that a perfect susanoo was equivalent to a bijuu. Furthermore, Sasuke only possesses one Rinnegan but it is a Rinnegan with the power of the Sharingan therefore it is supposed to be in one eye. You witnessed what Madara did to the nine tailed beasts with a single standard Rinnegan and you saw Sasuke's new Space-Time Rinnegan ability. In addition, it may evolve to a nine tomoe Rinnegan one day. You seem to be forgetting that the Sharingan can subjugate a tailed beast as well.KiritoLevel96Alicization (talk) 01:54, August 31, 2014 (UTC)KiritoLevel96Alicization Sharingan Triple

Sasuke would still obliterate Bijuu Mode Naruto. I would like to know your thoughts anent this.KiritoLevel96Alicization ([[User talk:KiritoLevel96Alicization|talk]]) 00:31, September 8, 2014 (UTC)KiritoLevel96AlicizationSharingan Triple

Pardon me, but are you certain that Sasuke has no feats that put him above Bijuu Mode Naruto?KiritoLevel96Alicization (talk) 22:26, September 9, 2014 (UTC)KiritoLevel96AlicizationSharingan Triple (talk) 00:37, September 8, 2014 (UTC)KiritoLevel96AlicizationSharingan Triple


The majority is wrong, then. Hamura doesn't show any floating orbs behind his back and I'm not about to assume a black staff is proof he knew Gudodama. It isn't added. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Rinnegan Sasuke 06:55, September 1, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Re Kakashi's Susanoo

  • I don't give a f--- about your ego. Neither does anyone else.
  • Naming a section "I was damn right" is the equivalent of dropping your trousers and just going at it as far as I am concerned.
  • It is still no where as factual as the last time you mentioned it. But at least now it's under the appropriate section instead of a new one that was, as I stated previously pants-dropping-going-to-town.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 16:42, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • If it wasn't an ego thing, "I was damn right" wouldn't have been used. Hindsight is 20x20.
  • I could have just changed the name. I also could have deleted it and pointed you to the right section. I choose to do the latter.
  • And nothing you actually say in my Talk Page will be considered for the article, so I suggest you make your argument in the Talk Page, under the right section.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 16:55, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm sure.
  • It would have been full of rehashed arguments anyway.
  • Consider it undeserved payback from a slight I believe you made against me if it makes you feel better. I am that petty.
And I am very tired of everything.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 17:16, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

Kakashi Talk Page

I reverted your edit and if you'd like to change it again then please wait until others (not just me and you) come to an agreement. I feel as though you havnt even read the chapter or else you'd know he said it to himself. Munchvtec (talk) 06:32, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Munchvtec (talk) 06:46, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

It's nice to actually meet a polite user on this wikia. I don't see you on very often though? Munchvtec (talk) 06:55, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

cool, i would say im not one of the polite users though im not like cerez or elveonora etc. Munchvtec (talk) 07:00, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Gaara and Magnet Release

To actually answer your request, as long as the articles are not locked I don't care what you do. At this point the entire argument is a analysis pissing match as far as I am concerned.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 21:41, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

Ultimate gave you the green light. You make the edits. I'll be sure they aren't undone. Just make sure you leave an edit summary. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Rinnegan Sasuke 22:10, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
Nope. You have to edit them one at a time no matter what user class you are. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Rinnegan Sasuke 22:12, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
Yes. I can do that. ~ Ten Tailed Fox Rinnegan Sasuke 22:16, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

Kakashi's Susanoo

You think I'm going in cirles? Then please explain me what is the difference between Kakashi/Obito and jinchūriki/tailed beast. Kakashi could use Susanoo only because he had Obito's chakra; the same for every Tailed Beast Skill used by jinchūriki. You keep saying that just because Obito is not a Tailed Beast, the two cases are completely different. Let's be honest: Kakashi isn't Obito's jinchūriki only because Obito is not a Tailed Beast – and as such he can't die if Obito's chakra "vanishes" or "gets extracted" – but apart from that, the way Kakashi used Obito's powers through the Uchiha's chakra – and not through body parts, like eyes – is exactly the same as a jinchūriki using Tailed Beast Skills. I think everything that had to be said about this has been said. Not to mention that the discussions on the Susanoo talkpage have been closed, with a big NO to both of our proposals--Mangekyō Sharingan Izuna JOA20 14:53, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Please explain this to me...

Not trying to start a debate, nor am I here to argue, but I want this fully explained (or rather, reminded) to me. Please give me all of the reasons why Gaara's sand manipulation is categorized as Magnet Release. Don't leave any detail out. Also, can you research for me if desert sand is magnetic? I know beach sand is, not sure about desert sand... But yeah, give me everything you said to @Tau, doesn't matter how much space it takes on my talk page (that's why we have archiving :P), for the validation of Gaara's sand manipulation being Magnet Release. Thanks in advance. --WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 02:25, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Anime images

When an editor of the wiki uploads an anime depiction of a manga scene and replaces the manga image in the articles, please do not go around reverting such edits, claiming them "pointless". The names of the files are not displayed anywhere on the article title itself and reverting these kind of edits is disruptive to the wiki's goal. --Sajuuk Talk Page | Uploads | Tabber | Contribs | Channel 14:11, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Pairing topics

You might want to consider reading this thread, it basically has a unanimous consensus to ban all pairing discussion here. I, and the other moderators and sysops, will continue to close these discussions down and give warnings in threads to stop the discussions continuing. This is not a "let's discuss everything about Naruto" forum, we must have restrictions on what topics can be posted or the site would be unmanageable and become extremely unsuitable. If you don't like these policies, make a thread to discuss them and gather a consensus. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 20:54, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

To be completely honest, shipping is for desperate virgin nerds who can't get laid for whatever reason, like being incapable to formulate a meaningful sentence in front of person of their interest or being just plain ugly, so the next best thing for them is to get excited by putting themselves in place of drawings and imagine themselves getting intimate aka. living a cartoon. It's an insult to intelligence. I had the "honor" to witness a woman in her thirties obsessing about romance and intimacy of two videogame characters, with her putting herself in shoes of the female character, most of day doing nothing but writing fiction of "herself" having sex with the male videogame character and I bet dreaming about it at night. That from an adult... in short: shipping/pairings ain't healthy, it can mess you up--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 21:07, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

@Elveonora What's ignorant is that answer you just gave. No disrespect but it is. That's like saying you shouldn't cheer a fiction character on to fight because its just a cartoon. I mean dude why do you even watch it if you aren't gonna any emotion of entertainment out of it. Just sit there emotionless. And people ship anime characters so what. Its nice to think they'd make a nice couple I mean at the end of the day we are humans with emotions so that action of shipping whether it be fiction or not can be made. I don't see the big idea.

@SuperSajuuk I realize that there has to be some restrictions but why this. Is this a reason. All you say is that its a rule by you don't say why. Tell me so I can no why. Rachin123 (talk) 22:05, September 25, 2014 (UTC)Rachin123

There are real human being to be emotionally attached to, instead of drawings, that's my point--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 22:17, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

So by your logic you shouldn't have any feelings during a show/movie/book because they're are actual humans to save it for. Why the heck do you think they were made? And just cuz someone wants to ship someone means that they are so attached. You know what I'm done with your absurb logic.Rachin123 (talk) 22:35, September 25, 2014 (UTC)Rachin123

Three-revert rule

You might want to consider reading it before you get into any more edit / revert wars on the wiki. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 14:06, October 4, 2014 (UTC)

And before you do, yang chakra isn't life force, because life force isn't chakra, manga/databook fact.--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 14:17, October 4, 2014 (UTC)

Recall back to Kabuto's inorganic reincarnation where he says that the technique goes beyond simple control with chakra, but uses life force instead. More than once was a clear distinction made between chakra and life force.--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 18:24, October 5, 2014 (UTC)


I am literally upset that TTF thinks he's big and bad because he is a sysop and is abusing his power. We were onky discussing matters of ages which like you said effects the wiki at large. TTF has somewhat gotten on my nerves before but now I lost all respect for him. Rachin123 (talk) 02:17, November 5, 2014 (UTC)Rachin123


You have been blocked for a week for your abusive and trolling messages to users of the forums. Messages like this are absolutely not permitted and are intolerable: users here should not be intimidated by people such as yourself when contributing. This is not the first time you have demonstrated extremely abusive behaviour to users when you don't get your own way, as shown in previous contributions. You will reacquaint yourself with the Forum policy in your week break or face very long blocks from the wiki for your behaviour if you persist in being abusive after your block expires. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 11:33, November 17, 2014 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.